+ Reply to Thread
Page 85 of 168 FirstFirst 1 35 75 85 95 135 168 LastLast
Results 1,681 to 1,700 of 3346

Thread: The Continuing Search For The Truth

  1. Link to Post #1681
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    Corporate Media Silence Deafening as Former Clinton Aide Confirms Ties to Jeffrey Epstein

    The bombshell that Clinton’s closest confidant confirmed the former president’s many trips aboard the “lolita express” has been totally ignored by the New York Times, Washington Post, NBC News, MSNBC, CBS News, and CNN.

    December 07th, 2020
    by Alan Macleod

    Source: mintpressnews.com


    A top Clinton insider has revealed that the former president visited the Caribbean home of notorious sex predator Jeffrey Epstein. In a long interview last week with Vanity Fair, longtime aide to Bill Clinton, Doug Band, noted that, contrary to the official line, his boss did indeed spend time on Little Saint James, the private island that the billionaire pedophile used as a base to traffick and rape women and children.

    Neither Band nor his interviewer appeared to realize the gravity of what he was revealing, the subject being touched upon only briefly towards the end of a wide-ranging 7,000-word conversation in which he noted that in January 2003, Clinton flew on Epstein’s notorious “Lolita Express” private jet to the island. Band appeared to bring the incident up only as a way of distancing himself from the disgraced pedophile, who died under mysterious circumstances in a Manhattan prison in July last year. Band insisted that he knew nothing of Epstein’s misdeeds, but “got enough bad vibes that he advised Clinton to end the relationship,” refusing to travel aboard Epstein’s jet with his employer. Flight logs show Clinton made around two dozen trips on the infamous airplane.

    Band is certainly a source in the know. For years he served as Clinton’s most trusted aide and confidant, traveling by his side and arranging his appointments for him. The former president famously did not carry even a cellphone, meaning that everyone from journalists to even Hillary and Chelsea Clinton would have had to go through Band to speak to him.

    Band’s testimony adds weight to others who have already said they saw him on the island. Epstein victim Virginia Giuffre previously stated that Clinton “strolled into” Epstein’s private villa with “two lovely girls” in his arms. “There was no modesty between any of them,” she said. “I remember asking Jeffrey what’s Bill Clinton doing here,” Giuffre said in an interview earlier this year, “and he laughed it off and said ‘well he owes me a favor.’” Epstein’s former IT and maintenance contractor also said he saw the former president on the island, an assertion that Clinton has denied. The former president was also photographed receiving a massage from Epstein victim Chauntae Davies while at an airport, on route via the Lolita Express.

    While the press might be forgiven for focussing more on the pandemic and the election, the virtual silence from corporate media has been deafening. The bombshell that Clinton’s closest confidant — whom friends describe as being like a “son” to him — has been totally ignored by the New York Times, Washington Post, NBC News, MSNBC, CBS News, and CNN, with no relevant results appearing in searches on their websites. ABC News, which for three years sat on information that could have resulted in an arrest, also did not cover the story.

    It was therefore left to more Republican-aligned, anti-Democrat media to play it up, the news appearing in conservative outlets like the Daily Wire, Fox News, and the New York Post. Unfortunately, this reinforces a partisan understanding of the Epstein case. Earlier this year, a MintPress study of one year of Epstein coverage on MSNBC and Fox News found intensely partisan coverage of the predator’s ties to Presidents Trump and Clinton. While MSNBC stressed his connections to the Republicans and downplayed his links to their preferred president, Fox News did the opposite, overwhelmingly focusing on the Clinton connections while failing to inform viewers about his relationship with the sitting president.

    Clinton has a long history of accusations of sexual misconduct against him. Arkansas nursing home administrator Juanita Broaddrick claimed that he raped her in 1978 while he was Attorney General of the state. Paula Jones accused Clinton of sexual assault and exposing himself to her in 1991, while Kathleen Willey accused Clinton of groping her without her consent in 1993. On the last charge, he reportedly proclaimed his innocence by arguing that Wiley’s breasts were not big enough for him to be interested. He was also infamously impeached for lying about his affair with 22-year-old White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Trump, meanwhile, also has his own history of sexual misconduct, the Wikipedia page on the subject is nearly 10,000 words long.

    Epstein was a convicted sex offender who was accused by dozens of women of trafficking, rape, or sexual assault, his crimes also involving a host of wealthy and well-connected individuals. His own enormous wealth appears to have come from his suspicious connection to Victoria’s Secret tycoon Leslie Wexner. For years, his links to the most influential figures and organizations seem to have kept him from justice, and, after his death, put the spotlight on them. Over the years, he built up a vast portfolio of connections to the rich and powerful all over the world, which included business magnates, heads of state, university professors, and some of the nation’s top journalists. Perhaps this explains why so few in the media are willing to touch the latest twist in this neverending story.


    Alan MacLeod is a Staff Writer for MintPress News. After completing his PhD in 2017 he published two books: Bad News From Venezuela: Twenty Years of Fake News and Misreporting and Propaganda in the Information Age: Still Manufacturing Consent. He has also contributed to Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting, The Guardian, Salon, The Grayzone, Jacobin Magazine, Common Dreams the American Herald Tribune and The Canary.
    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    avid (9th December 2020), Bill Ryan (15th December 2020), ClearWater (9th December 2020), fifi (9th December 2020), RunningDeer (9th December 2020)

  3. Link to Post #1682
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,091 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    Former FBI Agent Sues The FBI & Bill Clinton For $1.4 Million and Wins
    24,717 views•Dec 9, 2020
    Valuetainment
    2.71M subscribers

    "Patrick Bet-David has a virtual sit-down with FBI whistlelower Dr. Frederic Whitehurst.

    About the Guest: Frederic "Fred" Whitehurst is an American chemist and attorney who served as a Supervisory Special Agent in the Federal Bureau of Investigation Laboratory from 1986 to 1998. Concerned about problems he saw among agents, he went public as a whistleblower to bring attention to procedural errors and misconduct by agents."

    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  4. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (9th December 2020), Bill Ryan (15th December 2020), ClearWater (9th December 2020), fifi (9th December 2020), RunningDeer (9th December 2020)

  5. Link to Post #1683
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    Shocking report on COVID vaccine adverse effects: the roll-out continues anyway


    Millions of people can experience life-threatening effects from the vaccine

    by Jon Rappoport

    December 14, 2020

    (To join our email list, click here.)

    From the UK, The Guardian has the story [1]: “People with a history of significant allergic reactions should not receive the Covid vaccine, the medicines regulator has said, after two NHS workers experienced symptoms on Wednesday.”

    They just figured this out? Now?

    The Guardian is referring to the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine, which has just been approved in the US.

    Two people experiencing significant adverse effects may not sound important, particularly since they already a history of allergic reactions, but the following quote in the Guardian article raises major red flags a mile high:

    “The MHRA [UK Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency] advice states: ‘Any person with a history of a significant allergic reaction to a vaccine, medicine or food (such as previous history of anaphylactoid reaction or those who have been advised to carry an adrenaline autoinjector) should not receive the Pfizer/BioNtech vaccine. Resuscitation facilities should be available at all times for all vaccinations. Vaccination should only be carried out in facilities where resuscitation measures are available’.”

    First of all, a very large number of people have a history of allergic reactions to a vaccine or medicine or food. Automatically, these people should not take the vaccine. But how many people in the general public are aware of this restriction?

    Second, with the operation to vaccinate hundreds of millions of people running at top speed, who actually believes that many locations where shots are given will have the necessary resuscitation equipment on hand? Sheer insanity.

    Then, on top of all this, we have a bombshell statement from the Denver Post [2]: “Documents published by the two [vaccine] companies [Pfizer and BioNTech] showed that people with a history of severe allergic reactions were excluded from the [clinical vaccine] trials, and doctors were advised to look out for such reactions in trial participants who weren’t previously known to have severe allergies.”

    In other words, the clinical trials were already biased, because they excluded people with a history of allergic reactions. Therefore, the performance of the vaccine looked safer. Therefore, no one would find out that allergic reactions to the vaccine are a MAJOR danger.

    And NOW, as if it’s nothing more than an afterthought, we get—“Oh, by the way, if people have allergies, they shouldn’t take the vaccine.”

    Why don’t regulators simply admit, “This vaccine is as disastrous as possible, but we can’t let that cat out of the bag.”

    I have written about the inherent dangers of the new experimental RNA technology deployed with this COVOD vaccine. The world population is a vast group of guinea pigs. Past efforts to introduce RNA tech have failed because serious autoimmune reactions have occurred. [3] The body basically attacks itself.

    What rational person would line up to take this shot?

    You have to ask yourself why some Pittsburgh and Chicago medical centers aren’t making the new COVID vaccine mandatory for their own healthcare workers. [4] [5]

    They’ve issued that announcement on the basis of wait-and-see. They know the vaccine carries major risks, and the clinical trials were far from convincing.

    According to WebMD [6], “more than 50 million Americans suffer from allergies each year.” 200,000 people come to the ER with food allergies. 4-5% of the population have food allergies. Who can say, with certainty, how many Americans would experience, say, life- threatening anaphylactic shock from the COVID vaccine?

    And when it comes to medicines, consider just one type of allergic reaction—to penicillin or antibiotics. Is the outbreak of a rash serious enough to warrant automatic exemption from the COVID vaccine? Should shortness of breath be the standard? No one knows.

    Finally, as I’ve reported in these pages several times, the 3 major clinical trials of COVID vaccines (Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca) were designed to prevent nothing more than a “mild case of COVID-19.” That means a cough, or chills and fever. [7]

    Serious cases of illness? Hospitalization? Death? These were not on the radar of the clinical trials.

    Cough, or chills and fever, cure themselves naturally. No need for a vaccine.

    So again, what rational person would line up to take the COVID shot?

    What rational person would imagine the celebratory media coverage of the vaccine rollout, or the carnival barking of Trump, amounts to more than a typical sales job and a hustle and a con? [8]

    Of course, you’re not supposed to know about the information in this article, even though it’s readily available in open source literature and in mainstream news. Social media censor the ANALYSIS OF THE MEANING OF THIS INFORMATION.

    That’s called a clue.

    That’s called medical tyranny.

    A dictatorship wants you to take the COVID shot.

    That’s another clue.

    SOURCES:

    [1] https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...ators-reaction

    [2] https://www.denverpost.com/2020/12/09...gic-reactions/

    [3] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/01/26/vaccine-for-the-china-virus-the-planet-is-the-guinea-pig-for-a-vast-experiment/

    [4] https://chicago.suntimes.com/2020/12...-care-hospital

    [5] https://www.bizjournals.com/pittsbur...ory-staff.html

    [6] https://www.webmd.com/allergies/allergy-statistics

    [7] https://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020...l-design-flaw/

    [8] http://blog.nomorefakenews.com/2020/...id-you-expect/
    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  6. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (15th December 2020), ByTheNorthernSea (15th December 2020), onevoice (15th December 2020), pueblo (15th December 2020), RunningDeer (15th December 2020)

  7. Link to Post #1684
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    Big Brother in Disguise: The Rise of a New, Technological World Order

    By John W. Whitehead
    Global Research, December 16, 2020


    “You had to live—did live, from habit that became instinct—in the assumption that every sound you made was overheard, and, except in darkness, every movement scrutinized.”—George Orwell, 1984

    It had the potential for disaster.

    Early in the morning of Monday, December 15, 2020, Google suffered a major worldwide outage in which all of its internet-connected services crashed, including Nest, Google Calendar, Gmail, Docs, Hangouts, Maps, Meet and YouTube.

    The outage only lasted an hour, but it was a chilling reminder of how reliant the world has become on internet-connected technologies to do everything from unlocking doors and turning up the heat to accessing work files, sending emails and making phone calls.

    A year earlier, a Google outage resulted in Nest users being unable to access their Nest thermostats, Nest smart locks, and Nest cameras. As Fast Company reports, “This essentially meant that because of a cloud storage outage, people were prevented from getting inside their homes, using their AC, and monitoring their babies.

    Welcome to the Matrix.

    Twenty-some years after the Wachowskis’ iconic film, The Matrix, introduced us to a futuristic world in which humans exist in a computer-simulated non-reality powered by authoritarian machines—a world where the choice between existing in a denial-ridden virtual dream-state or facing up to the harsh, difficult realities of life comes down to a blue pill or a red pill—we stand at the precipice of a technologically-dominated matrix of our own making.

    We are living the prequel to The Matrix with each passing day, falling further under the spell of technologically-driven virtual communities, virtual realities and virtual conveniences managed by artificially intelligent machines that are on a fast track to replacing human beings and eventually dominating every aspect of our lives.

    Science fiction has become fact.

    In The Matrix, computer programmer Thomas Anderson a.k.a. hacker Neo is wakened from a virtual slumber by Morpheus, a freedom fighter seeking to liberate humanity from a lifelong hibernation state imposed by hyper-advanced artificial intelligence machines that rely on humans as an organic power source. With their minds plugged into a perfectly crafted virtual reality, few humans ever realize they are living in an artificial dream world.

    Neo is given a choice: to take the red pill, wake up and join the resistance, or take the blue pill, remain asleep and serve as fodder for the powers-that-be.

    Most people opt for the blue pill.

    In our case, the blue pill—a one-way ticket to a life sentence in an electronic concentration camp—has been honey-coated to hide the bitter aftertaste, sold to us in the name of expediency and delivered by way of blazingly fast Internet, cell phone signals that never drop a call, thermostats that keep us at the perfect temperature without our having to raise a finger, and entertainment that can be simultaneously streamed to our TVs, tablets and cell phones.

    Yet we are not merely in thrall with these technologies that were intended to make our lives easier. We have become enslaved by them.

    Look around you. Everywhere you turn, people are so addicted to their internet-connected screen devices—smart phones, tablets, computers, televisions—that they can go for hours at a time submerged in a virtual world where human interaction is filtered through the medium of technology.

    This is not freedom.

    This is not even progress.

    This is technological tyranny and iron-fisted control delivered by way of the surveillance state, corporate giants such as Google and Facebook, and government spy agencies such as the National Security Agency.

    So consumed are we with availing ourselves of all the latest technologies that we have spared barely a thought for the ramifications of our heedless, headlong stumble towards a world in which our abject reliance on internet-connected gadgets and gizmos is grooming us for a future in which freedom is an illusion.

    Yet it’s not just freedom that hangs in the balance. Humanity itself is on the line.

    If ever Americans find themselves in bondage to technological tyrants, we will have only ourselves to blame for having forged the chains through our own lassitude, laziness and abject reliance on internet-connected gadgets and gizmos that render us wholly irrelevant.

    Indeed, we’re fast approaching Philip K. Dick’s vision of the future as depicted in the film Minority Report. There, police agencies apprehend criminals before they can commit a crime, driverless cars populate the highways, and a person’s biometrics are constantly scanned and used to track their movements, target them for advertising, and keep them under perpetual surveillance.

    Cue the dawning of the Age of the Internet of Things (IoT), in which internet-connected “things” monitor your home, your health and your habits in order to keep your pantry stocked, your utilities regulated and your life under control and relatively worry-free.

    The key word here, however, is control.

    In the not-too-distant future, “just about every device you have — and even products like chairs, that you don’t normally expect to see technology in — will be connected and talking to each other.

    By the end of 2018, “there were an estimated 22 billion internet of things connected devices in use around the world… Forecasts suggest that by 2030 around 50 billion of these IoT devices will be in use around the world, creating a massive web of interconnected devices spanning everything from smartphones to kitchen appliances.”

    As the technologies powering these devices have become increasingly sophisticated, they have also become increasingly widespread, encompassing everything from toothbrushes and lightbulbs to cars, smart meters and medical equipment.

    Read More: “Technotyranny”: The Iron-Fisted Authoritarianism of the Surveillance State

    It is estimated that 127 new IoT devices are connected to the web every second.

    This “connected” industry has become the next big societal transformation, right up there with the Industrial Revolution, a watershed moment in technology and culture.

    Between driverless cars that completely lacking a steering wheel, accelerator, or brake pedal, and smart pills embedded with computer chips, sensors, cameras and robots, we are poised to outpace the imaginations of science fiction writers such as Philip K. Dick and Isaac Asimov. (By the way, there is no such thing as a driverless car. Someone or something will be driving, but it won’t be you.)

    These Internet-connected techno gadgets include smart light bulbs that discourage burglars by making your house look occupied, smart thermostats that regulate the temperature of your home based on your activities, and smart doorbells that let you see who is at your front door without leaving the comfort of your couch.

    Nest, Google’s suite of smart home products, has been at the forefront of the “connected” industry, with such technologically savvy conveniences as a smart lock that tells your thermostat who is home, what temperatures they like, and when your home is unoccupied; a home phone service system that interacts with your connected devices to “learn when you come and go” and alert you if your kids don’t come home; and a sleep system that will monitor when you fall asleep, when you wake up, and keep the house noises and temperature in a sleep-conducive state.

    The aim of these internet-connected devices, as Nest proclaims, is to make “your house a more thoughtful and conscious home.” For example, your car can signal ahead that you’re on your way home, while Hue lights can flash on and off to get your attention if Nest Protect senses something’s wrong. Your coffeemaker, relying on data from fitness and sleep sensors, will brew a stronger pot of coffee for you if you’ve had a restless night.

    Yet given the speed and trajectory at which these technologies are developing, it won’t be long before these devices are operating entirely independent of their human creators, which poses a whole new set of worries. As technology expert Nicholas Carr notes, “As soon as you allow robots, or software programs, to act freely in the world, they’re going to run up against ethically fraught situations and face hard choices that can’t be resolved through statistical models. That will be true of self-driving cars, self-flying drones, and battlefield robots, just as it’s already true, on a lesser scale, with automated vacuum cleaners and lawnmowers.”

    For instance, just as the robotic vacuum, Roomba, “makes no distinction between a dust bunny and an insect,” weaponized drones—poised to take to the skies en masse this year—will be incapable of distinguishing between a fleeing criminal and someone merely jogging down a street. For that matter, how do you defend yourself against a robotic cop—such as the Atlas android being developed by the Pentagon—that has been programmed to respond to any perceived threat with violence?

    Moreover, it’s not just our homes and personal devices that are being reordered and reimagined in this connected age: it’s our workplaces, our health systems, our government, our bodies and our innermost thoughts that are being plugged into a matrix over which we have no real control.

    Indeed, it is expected that by 2030, we will all experience The Internet of Senses (IoS), enabled by Artificial Intelligence (AI), Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), 5G, and automation. The Internet of Senses relies on connected technology interacting with our senses of sight, sound, taste, smell, and touch by way of the brain as the user interface. As journalist Susan Fourtane explains:
    Many predict that by 2030, the lines between thinking and doing will blur. Fifty-nine percent of consumers believe that we will be able to see map routes on VR glasses by simply thinking of a destination… By 2030, technology is set to respond to our thoughts, and even share them with others… Using the brain as an interface could mean the end of keyboards, mice, game controllers, and ultimately user interfaces for any digital device. The user needs to only think about the commands, and they will just happen. Smartphones could even function without touch screens.
    In other words, the IoS will rely on technology being able to access and act on your thoughts.

    Fourtane outlines several trends related to the IoS that are expected to become a reality by 2030:
    1: Thoughts become action: using the brain as the interface, for example, users will be able to see map routes on VR glasses by simply thinking of a destination.

    2: Sounds will become an extension of the devised virtual reality: users could mimic anyone’s voice realistically enough to fool even family members.

    3: Real food will become secondary to imagined tastes. A sensory device for your mouth could digitally enhance anything you eat, so that any food can taste like your favorite treat.

    4: Smells will become a projection of this virtual reality so that virtual visits, to forests or the countryside for instance, would include experiencing all the natural smells of those places.

    5: Total touch: Smartphones with screens will convey the shape and texture of the digital icons and buttons they are pressing.

    6: Merged reality: VR game worlds will become indistinguishable from physical reality by 2030.
    Unfortunately, in our race to the future, we have failed to consider what such dependence on technology might mean for our humanity, not to mention our freedoms.

    Ingestible or implantable chips are a good example of how unprepared we are, morally and otherwise, to navigate this uncharted terrain. Hailed as revolutionary for their ability to access, analyze and manipulate your body from the inside, these smart pills can remind you to take your medication, search for cancer, and even send an alert to your doctor warning of an impending heart attack.

    Sure, the technology could save lives, but is that all we need to know?

    Have we done our due diligence in asking all the questions that need to be asked before unleashing such awesome technology on an unsuspecting populace?

    For example, asks Washington Post reporter Ariana Eunjung Cha:
    What kind of warnings should users receive about the risks of implanting chip technology inside a body, for instance? How will patients be assured that the technology won’t be used to compel them to take medications they don’t really want to take? Could law enforcement obtain data that would reveal which individuals abuse drugs or sell them on the black market? Could what started as a voluntary experiment be turned into a compulsory government identification program that could erode civil liberties?
    Let me put it another way.

    If you were shocked by Edward Snowden’s revelations about how NSA agents have used surveillance to spy on Americans’ phone calls, emails and text messages, can you imagine what unscrupulous government agents could do with access to your internet-connected car, home and medications? Imagine what a SWAT team could do with the ability to access, monitor and control your internet-connected home—locking you in, turning off the lights, activating alarms, etc.

    While President Trump signed the Internet of Things Cybersecurity Improvement Act into law on Dec. 4, 2020, in order to establish a baseline for security protection for the billions of IoT devices flooding homes and businesses, the law does little to protect the American people against corporate and governmental surveillance.

    In fact, the public response to concerns about government surveillance has amounted to a collective shrug.

    After all, who cares if the government can track your whereabouts on your GPS-enabled device so long as it helps you find the fastest route from Point A to Point B? Who cares if the NSA is listening in on your phone calls and downloading your emails so long as you can get your phone calls and emails on the go and get lightning fast Internet on the fly? Who cares if the government can monitor your activities in your home by tapping into your internet-connected devices—thermostat, water, lights—so long as you can control those things with the flick of a finger, whether you’re across the house or across the country?

    Control is the key here.

    As I make clear in my book Battlefield America: The War on the American People, total control over every aspect of our lives, right down to our inner thoughts, is the objective of any totalitarian regime.

    George Orwell understood this.

    Orwell’s masterpiece, 1984, portrays a global society of total control in which people are not allowed to have thoughts that in any way disagree with the corporate state. There is no personal freedom, and advanced technology has become the driving force behind a surveillance-driven society. Snitches and cameras are everywhere. And people are subject to the Thought Police, who deal with anyone guilty of thought crimes. The government, or “Party,” is headed by Big Brother, who appears on posters everywhere with the words: “Big Brother is watching you.”

    Make no mistake: the Internet of Things and its twin, the Internet of Senses, is just Big Brother in disguise.

    *

    This article was originally published on The Rutherford Institute.

    Constitutional attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of The Rutherford Institute. His new book Battlefield America: The War on the American People is available at www.amazon.com. Whitehead can be contacted at johnw@rutherford.org.
    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  8. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    Harmony (17th December 2020), onawah (19th December 2020), onevoice (18th January 2021), RunningDeer (17th December 2020), sunflower (17th December 2020)

  9. Link to Post #1685
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    Thruthstream Media | The Characteristics of Cults | Dec. 19, 2020

    Source: TruthstreamMedia.com

    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    RunningDeer (21st December 2020)

  11. Link to Post #1686
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    Why you shouldn’t believe the COVID vaccine is effective

    Source: blog.nomorefakenews.com

    by Jon Rappoport
    December 21, 2020

    I’ve covered the dangers of the vaccine. Now I want to show why it’s ineffective, even assuming the basic theory of vaccination is valid.

    Peter Doshi, associate editor of the medical journal BMJ, and Eric Topol, Scripps Research professor of molecular medicine, wrote a devastating NY Times opinion piece about the COVID vaccine clinical trials.

    They exposed the fatal flaw in the large Pfizer, AstraZeneca, and Moderna trials.

    September 22, the Times: “These Coronavirus Trials Don’t Answer the One Question We Need to Know”:

    “If you were to approve a coronavirus vaccine, would you approve one that you only knew protected people only from the most mild form of Covid-19, or one that would prevent its serious complications?”

    “The answer is obvious. You would want to protect against the worst cases.”

    “But that’s not how the companies testing three of the leading coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose U.S. trial is on hold, are approaching the problem.”

    “According to the protocols for their studies, which they released late last week, a vaccine could meet the companies’ benchmark for success if it lowered the risk of mild Covid-19, but was never shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease, or the risk of hospitalization, admissions to the intensive care unit or death.”

    “To say a vaccine works should mean that most people no longer run the risk of getting seriously sick. That’s not what these trials will determine.”

    This means these clinical trials were dead in the water.

    The trials were designed to show effectiveness in preventing mild cases of COVID—a cough, or chills and fever—which nobody should care about, because mild cases naturally run their course and cause no harm. THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES.

    Now I’ll explain WHY the clinical trials were only designed to show the vaccine could prevent mild cases.

    The vaccine makers assume the SARS-CoV-2 virus is everywhere. Therefore, during the course of a clinical trial, the virus will descend from the clouds and infect a certain number of volunteers in the trial.

    All those volunteers are healthy. They’re not old and frail. They’ve already been screened and eliminated, if they have a history of serious allergies.

    So, when the SARS-CoV-2 virus attacks a few of these healthy volunteers, what are the odds it will cause serious cases of pneumonia, requiring hospitalization?

    The odds are VERY long against.

    How long do you think the vaccine makers would have to wait before, say, 150 of the healthy volunteers came down with serious pneumonia?

    Five years? Ten? Forever?

    Pfizer isn’t going to stand around and wait and wait and wait. Are you kidding?

    No, they’re only going to wait until 150 volunteers (the preordained magic number) come down with a cough, or simple chills and fever—a mild COVID case.

    Then they’re going to stop the clinical trial.

    Then they’re going see how many of those 150 mild cases occurred in the people who got the vaccine, and how many cases occurred in the people who got the saltwater placebo shot.

    This is how they find out how effective the vaccine is.

    And indeed—according to Pfizer—most of the cases occurred in volunteers who got the saltwater placebo shot.

    Therefore, Pfizer could claim the vaccine was effective in protecting against cough, or chills and fever. Mild cases of COVID.

    That’s ALL Pfizer could say.

    And THAT’S why the clinical trials were a failure. Because the trials were only set up to show prevention of mild cases—which nobody should care about.

    I could go on and explain how the vaccine makers could fake even that useless claim, but I’ll leave it there.

    The COVID vaccine is designed to prevent nothing important or significant.

    All the rave reviews of the vaccine, the babbling about a historic breakthrough, the celebrations—complete and utter nonsense.
    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    avid (22nd December 2020), RunningDeer (22nd December 2020)

  13. Link to Post #1687
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    Michel Chossudovsky | Bankrupting the US Economy Is No Solution | Guns & Butter


    Source: gunsandbutter.org, globalresearch.ca



    The neoliberal agenda; the decision making process leading to the closure of economic activity; the crisis and the lockdown; the new normal; the destruction of humanity; hegemony of finance capital over the real economy; the green economy; countries funding their own indebtedness; assets picked up at negative prices;

    colonialism; speculative financial instruments; global debt operation; mechanisms of deceit and manipulation; public heath concern used as a pretext and a justification; media disinformation and the fear campaign; the World Economic Forum plan for the great re-set of the global economy; global governance.
    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    avid (23rd December 2020)

  15. Link to Post #1688
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down Society

    It is time for everyone to come out of this negative trance, this collective hysteria, because famine, poverty, massive unemployment will kill, mow down many more people than SARS-CoV-2!

    Source: globalresearch.ca

    By Dr. Pascal Sacré
    Global Research, December 22, 2020


    Introduction: using a technique to lock down society

    All current propaganda on the COVID-19 pandemic is based on an assumption that is considered obvious, true and no longer questioned:

    Positive RT-PCR test means being sick with COVID. This assumption is misleading.

    Very few people, including doctors, understand how a PCR test works.

    RT-PCR means Real Time-Polymerase Chain Reaction.

    In French, it means: Réaction de Polymérisation en Chaîne en Temps Réel.

    In medicine, we use this tool mainly to diagnose a viral infection.

    Starting from a clinical situation with the presence or absence of particular symptoms in a patient, we consider different diagnoses based on tests.

    In the case of certain infections, particularly viral infections, we use the RT-PCR technique to confirm a diagnostic hypothesis suggested by a clinical picture.

    We do not routinely perform RT-PCR on any patient who is overheated, coughing or has an inflammatory syndrome!

    It is a laboratory, molecular biology technique of gene amplification because it looks for gene traces (DNA or RNA) by amplifying them.

    In addition to medicine, other fields of application are genetics, research, industry and forensics.

    The technique is carried out in a specialized laboratory, it cannot be done in any laboratory, even a hospital. This entails a certain cost, and a delay sometimes of several days between the sample and the result.

    Today, since the emergence of the new disease called COVID-19 (COrona VIrus Disease-2019), the RT-PCR diagnostic technique is used to define positive cases, confirmed as SARS-CoV-2 (coronavirus responsible for the new acute respiratory distress syndrome called COVID-19).

    These positive cases are assimilated to COVID-19 cases, some of whom are hospitalized or even admitted to intensive care units.

    Official postulate of our managers: positive RT-PCR cases = COVID-19 patients. [1]

    This is the starting postulate, the premise of all official propaganda, which justifies all restrictive government measures: isolation, confinement, quarantine, mandatory masks, color codes by country and travel bans, tracking, social distances in companies, stores and even, even more importantly, in schools [2].

    This misuse of RT-PCR technique is used as a relentless and intentional strategy by some governments, supported by scientific safety councils and by the dominant media, to justify excessive measures such as the violation of a large number of constitutional rights, the destruction of the economy with the bankruptcy of entire active sectors of society, the degradation of living conditions for a large number of ordinary citizens, under the pretext of a pandemic based on a number of positive RT-PCR tests, and not on a real number of patients.

    Technical aspects: to better understand and not be manipulated

    The PCR technique was developed by chemist Kary B. Mullis in 1986. Kary Mullis was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993.

    Although this is disputed [3], Kary Mullis himself is said to have criticized the interest of PCR as a diagnostic tool for an infection, especially a viral one.

    He stated that if PCR was a good tool for research, it was a very bad tool in medicine, in the clinic [4].

    Mullis was referring to the AIDS virus (HIV retrovirus or HIV) [5], before the COVID-19 pandemic, but this opinion on the limitation of the technique in viral infections [6], by its creator, cannot be dismissed out of hand; it must be taken into account!

    PCR was perfected in 1992.

    As the analysis can be performed in real time, continuously, it becomes RT (Real-Time) – PCR, even more efficient.

    It can be done from any molecule, including those of the living, the nucleic acids that make up the genes:
    DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid)
    RNA (Ribonucleic Acid)
    Viruses are not considered as “living” beings, they are packets of information (DNA or RNA) forming a genome.

    It is by an amplification technique (multiplication) that the molecule sought is highlighted and this point is very important.

    RT-PCR is an amplification technique [7].

    If there is DNA or RNA of the desired element in a sample, it is not identifiable as such.

    This DNA or RNA must be amplified (multiplied) a certain number of times, sometimes a very large number of times, before it can be detected. From a minute trace, up to billions of copies of a specific sample can be obtained, but this does not mean that there is all that amount in the organism being tested.

    In the case of COVID-19, the element sought by RT-PCR is SARS-CoV-2, an RNA virus [8].

    There are DNA viruses such as Herpes and Varicella viruses.

    The most well known RNA viruses, in addition to coronaviruses, are Influenza, Measles, EBOLA, ZIKA viruses.

    In the case of SARS-CoV-2, RNA virus, an additional specific step is required, a transcription of RNA into DNA by means of an enzyme, Reverse Transcriptase.

    This step precedes the amplification phase.

    It is not the whole virus that is identified, but sequences of its viral genome.

    This does not mean that this gene sequence, a fragment of the virus, is not specific to the virus being sought, but it is an important nuance nonetheless:

    RT-PCR does not reveal any virus, but only parts, specific gene sequences of the virus.

    At the beginning of the year, the SARS-CoV-2 genome was sequenced.

    It consists of about 30,000 base pairs. The nucleic acid (DNA-RNA), the component of the genes, is a sequence of bases. In comparison, the human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs.

    Teams are continuously monitoring the evolution of the SARS-CoV-2 viral genome as it evolves [9-10-11], through the mutations it undergoes. Today, there are many variants [12].

    By taking a few specific genes from the SARS-CoV-2 genome, it is possible to initiate RT-PCR on a sample from the respiratory tract.

    For COVID-19 disease, which has a nasopharyngeal (nose) and oropharyngeal (mouth) entry point, the sample should be taken from the upper respiratory tract as deeply as possible in order to avoid contamination by saliva in particular.

    All the people tested said that it is very painful [13].

    The Gold Standard (preferred site for sampling) is the nasopharyngeal (nasal) approach, the most painful route.

    If there is a contraindication to the nasal approach, or preferably to the individual being tested, depending on the official organs, the oropharyngeal approach (through the mouth) is also acceptable. The test may trigger a nausea/vomiting reflex in the individual being tested.

    Normally, for the result of an RT-PCR test to be considered reliable, amplification from 3 different genes (primers) of the virus under investigation is required.
    “The primers are single-stranded DNA sequences specific to the virus. They guarantee the specificity of the amplification reaction. » [14]

    “The first test developed at La Charité in Berlin by Dr. Victor Corman and his associates in January 2020 allows to highlight the RNA sequences present in 3 genes of the virus called E, RdRp and N. To know if the sequences of these genes are present in the RNA samples collected, it is necessary to amplify the sequences of these 3 genes in order to obtain a signal sufficient for their detection and quantification. »[15].
    The essential notion of Cycle Time or Cycle Threshold or Ct positivity threshold [16].

    An RT-PCR test is negative (no traces of the desired element) or positive (presence of traces of the desired element).

    However, even if the desired element is present in a minute, negligible quantity, the principle of RT-PCR is to be able to finally highlight it by continuing the amplification cycles as much as necessary.

    RT-PCR can push up to 60 amplification cycles, or even more!

    Here is how it works:

    Cycle 1: target x 2 (2 copies)

    Cycle 2: target x 4 (4 copies)

    Cycle 3: target x 8 (8 copies)

    Cycle 4: target x 16 (16 copies)

    Cycle 5; target x 32 (32 copies)

    Etc exponentially up to 40 to 60 cycles!

    When we say that the Ct (Cycle Time or Cycle Threshold or RT-PCR positivity threshold) is equal to 40, it means that the laboratory has used 40 amplification cycles, i.e. obtained 2⁴⁰ copies.

    This is what underlies the sensitivity of the RT-PCR assay.

    While it is true that in medicine we like to have high specificity and sensitivity of the tests to avoid false positives and false negatives, in the case of COVID-19 disease, this hypersensitivity of the RT-PCR test caused by the number of amplification cycles used has backfired.

    This over-sensitivity of the RT-PCR test is deleterious and misleading!

    It detaches us from the medical reality which must remain based on the real clinical state of the person: is the person ill, does he or she have symptoms?

    That is the most important thing!

    As I said at the beginning of the article, in medicine we always start from the person: we examine him/her, we collect his/her symptoms (complaints-anamnesis) and objective clinical signs (examination) and on the basis of a clinical reflection in which scientific knowledge and experience intervene, we make diagnostic hypotheses.

    Only then do we prescribe the most appropriate tests, based on this clinical reflection.

    We constantly compare the test results with the patient’s clinical condition (symptoms and signs), which takes precedence over everything else when it comes to our decisions and treatments.

    Today, our governments, supported by their scientific safety advice, are making us do the opposite and put the test first, followed by a clinical reflection necessarily influenced by this prior test, whose weaknesses we have just seen, particularly its hypersensitivity.

    None of my clinical colleagues can contradict me.

    Apart from very special cases such as genetic screening for certain categories of populations (age groups, sex) and certain cancers or family genetic diseases, we always work in this direction: from the person (symptoms, signs) to the appropriate tests, never the other way around.

    This is the conclusion of an article in the Swiss Medical Journal (RMS) published in 2007, written by doctors Katia Jaton and Gilbert Greub microbiologists from the University of Lausanne :

    PCR in microbiology: from DNA amplification to result interpretation:
    “To interpret the result of a PCR, it is essential that clinicians and microbiologists share their experiences, so that the analytical and clinical levels of interpretation can be combined.”
    It would be indefensible to give everyone an electrocardiogram to screen everyone who might have a heart attack one day.

    On the other hand, in certain clinical contexts or on the basis of specific evocative symptoms, there, yes, an electrocardiogram can be beneficial.

    Back to RT-PCR and Ct (Cycle Time or Cycle Threshold).

    In the case of an infectious disease, especially a viral one, the notion of contagiousness is another important element.

    Since some scientific circles consider that an asymptomatic person can transmit the virus, they believe it is important to test for the presence of virus, even if the person is asymptomatic, thus extending the indication of RT-PCR to everyone.

    Are RT-PCR tests good tests for contagiousness? [17]

    This question brings us back to the notion of viral load and therefore Ct.

    The relationship between contagiousness and viral load is disputed by some people [18] and no formal proof, to date, allows us to make a decision.

    However, common sense gives obvious credence to the notion that the more virus a person has inside him or her, especially in the upper airways (oropharynx and nasopharynx), with symptoms such as coughing and sneezing, the higher the risk of contagiousness, proportional to the viral load and the importance of the person’s symptoms.

    This is called common sense, and although modern medicine has benefited greatly from the contribution of science through statistics and Evidence-Based Medicine (EBM), it is still based primarily on common sense, experience and empiricism.

    Medicine is the art of healing.

    No test measures the amount of virus in the sample!

    RT-PCR is qualitative: positive (presence of the virus) or negative (absence of the virus).

    This notion of quantity, therefore of viral load, can be estimated indirectly by the number of amplification cycles (Ct) used to highlight the virus sought.

    The lower the Ct used to detect the virus fragment, the higher the viral load is considered to be (high).

    The higher the Ct used to detect the virus fragment, the lower the viral load is considered to be (low).

    Thus, the French National Reference Centre (CNR), in the acute phase of the pandemic, estimated that the peak of viral shedding occurred at the onset of symptoms, with an amount of virus corresponding to approximately 10⁸ (100 million) copies of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA on average (French COVID-19 cohort data) with a variable duration of shedding in the upper airways (from 5 days to more than 5 weeks) [19].

    This number of 108 (100 million) copies/μl corresponds to a very low Ct.

    A Ct of 32 corresponds to 10-15 copies/μl.

    A Ct of 35 corresponds to about 1 copy/μl.

    Above Ct 35, it becomes impossible to isolate a complete virus sequence and culture it!

    In France and in most countries, Ct levels above 35, even 40, are still used even today!

    The French Society of Microbiology (SFM) issued an opinion on September 25, 2020 in which it does not recommend quantitative results, and it recommends to make positive up to a Ct of 37 for a single gene [20]!

    With 1 copy/μl of a sample (Ct 35), without cough, without symptoms, one can understand why all these doctors and scientists say that a positive RT-PCR test means nothing, nothing at all in terms of medicine and clinic!

    Positive RT-PCR tests, without any mention of Ct or its relation to the presence or absence of symptoms, are used as is by our governments as the exclusive argument to apply and justify their policy of severity, austerity, isolation and aggression of our freedoms, with the impossibility to travel, to meet, to live normally!

    There is no medical justification for these decisions, for these governmental choices!

    In an article published on the website of the New York Times (NYT) on Saturday, August 29, American experts from Harvard University are surprised that RT-PCR tests as practiced can serve as tests of contagiousness, even more so as evidence of pandemic progression in the case of SARS-CoV-2 infection [21].

    Read More: The Tests: The Achilles Heel of the COVID-19 House of Cards

    According to them, the threshold (Ct) considered results in positive diagnoses in people who do not represent any risk of transmitting the virus!

    The binary “yes/no” answer is not enough, according to this epidemiologist from the Harvard University School of Public Health.

    “It’s the amount of virus that should dictate the course of action for each patient tested. »

    The amount of virus (viral load); but also and above all the clinical state, symptomatic or not of the person!

    This calls into question the use of the binary result of this RT-PCR test to determine whether a person is contagious and must follow strict isolation measures.

    These questions are being raised by many physicians around the world, not only in the United States but also in France, Belgium (Belgium Health Experts Demand Investigation Of WHO For Faking Coronavirus Pandemic), France, Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, the United States and the United Kingdom. in Germany, Spain…

    According to them: “We are going to put tens of thousands of people in confinement, in isolation, for nothing. » [22]. 22] And inflict suffering, anguish, economic and psychological dramas by the thousands!

    Most RT-PCR tests set the Ct at 40, according to the NYT. Some set it at 37.

    “Tests with such high thresholds (Ct) may not only detect live virus but also gene fragments, remnants of an old infection that do not represent any particular danger,” the experts said.

    A virologist at the University of California admits that an RT-PCR test with a Ct greater than 35 is too sensitive. “A more reasonable threshold would be between 30 and 35,” she adds.

    Almost no laboratory specifies the Ct (number of amplification cycles performed) or the number of copies of viral RNA per sample μl.

    Here is an example of a laboratory result (approved by Sciensano, the Belgian national reference center) in an RT-PCR negative patient.

    No mention of Ct.

    In the NYT, experts compiled three datasets with officials from the states of Massachusetts, New York and Nevada that mention them.

    Conclusion?

    Up to 90% of the people who tested positive did not carry a virus. »

    The Wadworth Center, a New York State laboratory, analyzed the results of its July tests at the request of the NYT: 794 positive tests with a Ct of 40.

    “With a Ct threshold of 35, approximately half of these PCR tests would no longer be considered positive,” said the NYT.

    “And about 70% would no longer be considered positive with a Ct of 30! “

    In Massachusetts, between 85 and 90% of people who tested positive in July with a Ct of 40 would have been considered negative with a Ct of 30, adds the NYT. And yet, all these people had to isolate themselves, with all the dramatic psychological and economic consequences, while they were not sick and probably not contagious at all.

    In France, the Centre National de Référence (CNR), the French Society of Microbiology (SFM) continue to push Ct to 37 and recommend to laboratories to use only one gene of the virus as a primer.

    I remind you that from Ct 32 onwards, it becomes very difficult to culture the virus or to extract a complete sequence, which shows the completely artificial nature of this positivity of the test, with such high Ct levels, above 30.

    Similar results were reported by researchers from the UK Public Health Agency in an article published on August 13 in Eurosurveillance: “The probability of culturing the virus drops to 8% in samples with Ct levels above 35.” [23]

    In addition, currently, the National Reference Center in France only evaluates the sensitivity of commercially available reagent kits, not their specificity: serious doubts persist about the possibility of cross-reactivity with viruses other than SARS-CoV-2, such as other benign cold coronaviruses. [20]

    It is potentially the same situation in other countries, including Belgium.

    Similarly, mutations in the virus may have invalidated certain primers (genes) used to detect SARS-CoV-2: the manufacturers give no guarantees on this, and if the AFP fast-checking journalists tell you otherwise, test their good faith by asking for these guarantees, these proofs.

    If they have nothing to hide and if what I say is false, this guarantee will be provided to you and will prove their good faith.
    1. We must demand that the RT-PCR results be returned mentioning the Ct used because beyond Ct 30, a positive RT-PCR test means nothing.

    2. We must listen to the scientists and doctors, specialists, virologists who recommend the use of adapted Ct, lower, at 30. An alternative is to obtain the number of copies of viral RNA/μl or /ml sample. [23]

    3. We need to go back to the patient, to the person, to his or her clinical condition (presence or absence of symptoms) and from there to judge the appropriateness of testing and the best way to interpret the result.
    Until there is a better rationale for PCR screening, with a known and appropriate Ct threshold, an asymptomatic person should not be tested in any way.

    Even a symptomatic person should not automatically be tested, as long as they can place themselves in isolation for 7 days.

    Let’s stop this debauchery of RT-PCR testing at too high Ct levels and return to clinical, quality medicine.

    Once we understand how RT-PCR testing works, it becomes impossible to let the current government routine screening strategy, inexplicably supported by the virologists in the safety councils, continue.

    My hope is that, finally, properly informed, more and more people will demand that this strategy be stopped, because it is all of us, enlightened, guided by real benevolence and common sense, who must decide our collective and individual destinies.

    No one else should do it for us, especially when we realize that those who decide are no longer reasonable or rational.

    Summary of important points :
    - The RT-PCR test is a laboratory diagnostic technique that is not well suited to clinical medicine.

    - It is a binary, qualitative diagnostic technique that confirms (positive test) or not (negative test) the presence of an element in the medium being analyzed. In the case of SARS-CoV-2, the element is a fragment of the viral genome, not the virus itself.

    - In medicine, even in an epidemic or pandemic situation, it is dangerous to place tests, examinations, techniques above clinical evaluation (symptoms, signs). It is the opposite that guarantees quality medicine.

    - The main limitation (weakness) of the RT-PCR test, in the current pandemic situation, is its extreme sensitivity (false positive) if a suitable threshold of positivity (Ct) is not chosen. Today, experts recommend using a maximum Ct threshold of 30.

    - This Ct threshold must be informed with the positive RT-PCR result so that the physician knows how to interpret this positive result, especially in an asymptomatic person, in order to avoid unnecessary isolation, quarantine, psychological trauma.

    - In addition to mentioning the Ct used, laboratories must continue to ensure the specificity of their detection kits for SARS-CoV-2, taking into account its most recent mutations, and must continue to use three genes from the viral genome being studied as primers or, if not, mention it.
    Overall Conclusion

    Is the obstinacy of governments to use the current disastrous strategy, systematic screening by RT-PCR, due to ignorance?

    Is it due to stupidity?

    To a kind of cognitive trap trapping their ego?

    In any case, we should be able to question them, and if among the readers of this article there are still honest journalists, or naive politicians, or people who have the possibility to question our rulers, then do so, using these clear and scientific arguments.

    It is all the more incomprehensible that our rulers have surrounded themselves with some of the most experienced specialists in these matters.

    If I have been able to gather this information myself, shared, I remind you, by competent people above all suspicion of conspiracy, such as Hélène Banoun, Pierre Sonigo, Jean-François Toussaint, Christophe De Brouwer, whose intelligence, intellectual honesty and legitimacy cannot be questioned, then the Belgian, French and Quebec scientific advisors, etc., know all this as well.

    So?

    What’s going on?

    Why continue in this distorted direction, obstinately making mistakes?

    It is not insignificant to reimpose confinements, curfews, quarantines, reduced social bubbles, to shake up again our shaky economies, to plunge entire families into precariousness, to sow so much fear and anxiety generating a real state of post-traumatic stress worldwide, to reduce access to care for other pathologies that nevertheless reduce life expectancy much more than COVID-19! [24]

    Is there intent to harm?

    Is there an intention to use the alibi of a pandemic to move humanity towards an outcome it would otherwise never have accepted? In any case, not like that!

    Would this hypothesis, which modern censors will hasten to label “conspiracy”, be the most valid explanation for all this?


    Indeed, if we draw a straight line from the present events, if they are maintained, we could find ourselves once again confined with hundreds, thousands of human beings forced to remain inactive, which, for the professions of catering, entertainment, sales, fairgrounds, itinerants, canvassers, risks being catastrophic with bankruptcies, unemployment, depression, suicides by the hundreds of thousands. [25-26-27-28]

    The impact on education, on our children, on teaching, on medicine with long planned care, operations, treatments to be cancelled, postponed, will be profound and destructive.

    “We risk a looming food crisis if action is not taken quickly.” [29].

    It is time for everyone to come out of this negative trance, this collective hysteria, because famine, poverty, massive unemployment will kill, mow down many more people than SARS-CoV-2!

    Does all this make sense in the face of a disease that is declining, over-diagnosed and misinterpreted by this misuse of overly sensitively calibrated PCR tests?

    For many, the continuous wearing of the mask seems to have become a new norm.

    Even if it is constantly downplayed by some health professionals and fact-checking journalists, other doctors warn of the harmful consequences, both medical and psychological, of this hygienic obsession which, maintained permanently, is in fact an abnormality!

    What a hindrance to social relations, which are the true foundation of a physically and psychologically healthy humanity!

    Some dare to find all this normal, or a lesser price to pay in the face of the pandemic of positive PCR tests.

    Isolation, distancing, masking of the face, impoverishment of emotional communication, fear of touching and kissing even within families, communities, between relatives…

    Spontaneous gestures of daily life hindered and replaced by mechanical and controlled gestures …

    Terrified children, kept in permanent fear and guilt…

    All this will have a deep, lasting and negative impact on human organisms, in their physical, mental, emotional and representation of the world and society.

    This is not normal!

    We cannot let our rulers, for whatever reason, organize our collective suicide any longer.

    Translated from French by Global Research. Original source: Mondialisation.ca

    Dr. Pascal Sacré is a physician specialized in critical care, author and renowned public health analyst, Charleroi, Belgium. He is a Research Associate of the entre for Research on Globalization (CRG)

    ****

    Professionals whose references and comments are the basis of this article in its scientific aspect (especially and mainly on RT-PCR):

    1) Hélène Banoun

    https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Helene_Banoun

    PhD, Pharmacist biologist

    Former INSERM Research Officer

    Former intern at the Paris Hospitals

    2) Pierre Sonigo

    Virologist

    Research Director INSERM, worked at the Pasteur Institute

    Heads the Virus Genetics Laboratory in Cochin, Paris.

    Participated in 1985 in the sequencing of the AIDS virus.

    3) Christophe De Brouwer

    PhD in Public Health Science

    Honorary Professor at the School of Public Health at ULB, Belgium

    4) Jean-François Toussaint

    Doctor, Professor of Physiology at the University of Paris-Descartes

    Director of IRMES, Institute for BioMedical Research and Sports Epidemiology

    Former member of the High Council of Public Health
    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  16. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    avid (23rd December 2020), Dreamer148 (7th February 2021), RunningDeer (23rd December 2020)

  17. Link to Post #1689
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    Dr. Carrie Madej with Dr. Andrew Kaufman on Vx , Hydrogel, and Secret Government Programs | Sept. 30, 2020

    Source: Dr. Carrie Madej youtube, Dr. Carrie Madej bitchute


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/L6PKzi4X2IJ9
    Last edited by Helvetic; 4th January 2021 at 14:49.
    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    RunningDeer (31st December 2020)

  19. Link to Post #1690
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    Must see:

    The Corbett Report | The Future of Vaccines

    Source, Transcript: corbettreport.com,
    Video on Bitchute


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/UQvaQFdGLn8/


    If the Gateses and the Faucis and the representatives of the international medical establishment get their way, life will not return to normal until the entire planet is vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. What many do not yet understand, however, is that the vaccines that are being developed for SARS-Cov-2 are unlike any vaccines that have ever been used on the human population before.

    And, as radically different as these vaccines appear, they represent only the very beginning of a complete transformation of vaccine technology that is currently taking place in research labs across the planet. This is a study of The Future of Vaccines.
    Last edited by Helvetic; 4th February 2021 at 14:49.
    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  20. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    onevoice (4th January 2021), RunningDeer (31st December 2020), sunflower (4th January 2021)

  21. Link to Post #1691
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    Luis Elizondo and John Greenewald, Jr. | 1 on 1 | Jan. 3, 2021

    Source: theblackvault.com



    In October of 2017, this counterintelligence officer and trained special agent by the name of Luis Elizondo, stepped out of the shadowed halls of the Pentagon and into the public spotlight. Whether he intended it or not, by doing so he would become an instant celebrity to UFO enthusiasts for saying something that would soon shake the entire world.

    Luis Elizondo: “By far the most interesting effort I was involved with was the topic of advanced aerial threats. For nearly the last decade, I ran a sensitive aerospace threat identification program focusing on unidentified aerial technologies. It was in this position I learned that the phenomena is indeed real.”

    Within minutes of speaking these words, The Black Vault used this once insider information to file numerous Freedom of Information Act requests to see what documents could be dug up. The idea was that in the eyes of the law -- if this former government agent was talking about it – the documents may just be ripe for the pickin’ if one were to ask for them. So that’s exactly what I did.

    This unfolding saga brought me hope that after more than 20 years of pushing for the truth, the veil of secrecy surrounding the UFO phenomenon might just be lifting once and for all – and things were drastically changing.

    Evidence of that change was revealed just two months after Elizondo stepped foot on that stage. That is when the mainstream media covered Elizondo, and his story, was a viral sensation all over the world.

    But as excitement exploded worldwide about this “Secret Pentagon UFO Study” known as the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program or AATIP; controversy had already begun to percolate inside The Black Vault about what was really going on.

    Just three weeks prior to the NY Times running their now world-famous headline; the Pentagon told The Black Vault they had no records on any program that Elizondo had described. Not a single piece of evidence whatsoever.

    A couple months after that; the Navy denied they gave anything to the AATIP program, despite what Elizondo had claimed.

    And then just months after that; the Pentagon issued a statement that was the most damning of all. They claimed that Elizondo “had no assigned responsibilities” on the AATIP program that he had brought to light.

    As the months, and years, passed since the initial headlines; The Black Vault became highly critical of Elizondo’s claims. That is not a popular stance to take, and as social media can easily prove, that type of stance can come with a little bit of heat!

    But it wasn’t just Elizondo on the receiving end of criticism. The Pentagon and the entire U.S. government has had a history of covering up UFO data for decades; and it appeared that’s what they may have been doing again. But to what extent?

    My guest today, is the man who started it all… Luis Elizondo himself. Despite The Black Vault’s criticism, and admittedly the nitpicking of every detail in order to find the absolute truth, Elizondo has agreed to step into the Vault and share his side of the story in a special one on one interview. -theblackvault.com
    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  22. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    bennycog (4th January 2021), onevoice (4th January 2021), RunningDeer (4th January 2021), sunflower (4th January 2021)

  23. Link to Post #1692
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    Ellen Brown | Financial System in Transition | Guns & Butter

    Source: gunsandbutter.org, ellenbrown.com



    Ellen Brown’s articles, "Meet BlackRock the New Great Vampire Squid", and "From Lockdown to Police State the Great Re-Set Rolls Out", are discussed:

    - The relationship between the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve Central Bank
    - Reserve requirement for banks eliminated
    - The repo market
    - The discount window at the Fed thrown open in March 2020
    - The Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act, or CARES Act, administered by BlackRock Financial Management on behalf of the Federal Reserve through eleven Special Purpose Vehicles
    - Blackrock’s Aladdin software data platform
    - Fed lending against riskier assets than allowed under the Federal Reserve Act
    - Exchange traded funds (ETFs) iShares bought by BlackRock;
    - Advantages of public banking
    - Liquidity crises the cause of crashes
    - Quadrillion in derivatives outstanding
    - World Economic Forum a public/private partnership
    - Great global re-set a re-characterization of the new world order
    - Global digital currency
    - Corporatocracy

    Aired: September 23, 2020
    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  24. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (17th January 2021), RunningDeer (5th January 2021)

  25. Link to Post #1693
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    Dr. Simone Gold | The truth about the CV19 vaccine


    Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/H7Vfb9Uucl2y/


    Must see! Please share.
    Last edited by Helvetic; 4th February 2021 at 14:43.
    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  26. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (17th January 2021), fifi (18th January 2021), onevoice (18th January 2021), RunningDeer (17th January 2021), Satori (11th February 2021), sunflower (18th January 2021)

  27. Link to Post #1694
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    In Memory of Kevin Smith | KSS - The Kevin Smith Show Online Archive! | Kevinsmithshow.info


    I would like to make this huge archive available to all of you. Please enjoy!

    Kevinsmithshow.info

    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  28. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (7th February 2021), RunningDeer (18th January 2021)

  29. Link to Post #1695
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    Catherine Austin Fitts | Planet Lockdown (Full Interview)

    Source: PlanetLockdownFilm.com, Solari.com


    Source: Watch on Vimeo



    Pison Planet brought to the spotlight Solaris CEO Catherine Austin Fitts, she also is a very well known Investments Advisor.

    Catherine gives her analysis and covers the spectrum in the economical war games that we are currently experiencing and have been planned in many years of advance.

    It was conducted as apart of the full-length documentary and a witness against those who prefer to remain in darkness.
    Last edited by Helvetic; 9th February 2021 at 10:25.
    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  30. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    avid (4th February 2021), Bill Ryan (7th February 2021), RunningDeer (4th February 2021), Satori (11th February 2021)

  31. Link to Post #1696
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    Prof. Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi | Full Interview | Planet Lockdown

    Source: PlanetLockdownFilm.com


    Source: Watch on Vimeo



    This sit down interview with Sucharit Bhakdi about the current situation we find ourselves in. He is the most cited microbiologist in German academic history, an authority if there ever was one Shocked by the events of this year, he is speaking out about the scientific fallacies and human rights abuses at work now.

    This interview was done as apart of the full length documentary.
    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  32. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    avid (4th February 2021), Bill Ryan (7th February 2021), Elainie (4th February 2021), RunningDeer (4th February 2021), Satori (11th February 2021)

  33. Link to Post #1697
    Scotland Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st February 2011
    Posts
    34
    Thanks
    779
    Thanked 220 times in 32 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    CATHERINE AUSTIN FITTS - THE ATTACK ON HUMAN MANKIND AND CIVILISATION GERMAN/ENGLISH #GENOCIDE21

    https://www.bitchute.com/video/d92O3lcPaQQV/

    A little long but well worth it.

  34. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Creedence For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (7th February 2021), RunningDeer (7th February 2021), Satori (11th February 2021)

  35. Link to Post #1698
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    Coronavirus Scandal Breaking in Merkel’s Germany. False Positives and the Drosten PCR Test

    By F. William Engdahl
    Global Research, February 11, 2021

    First posted by Global Research on December 11, 2020

    The widely-praised German model of the Angela Merkel regime to deal with the COVID-19 pandemic is now engulfed in a series of potentially devastating scandals going to the very heart of the testing and medical advice being used to declare draconian economic shutdowns and next, de facto mandatory vaccinations. The scandals involve a professor at the heart of Merkel’s corona advisory group. The implications go far beyond German borders to the very WHO itself and their global recommendations.

    The entire case for WHO-mandated emergency lockdown of businesses, schools, churches and other social arenas worldwide is based on a test introduced, amazingly early on, in the Wuhan, China coronavirus saga.

    On January 23, 2020, in the scientific journal Eurosurveillance, of the EU Center for Disease Prevention and Control, Dr. Christian Drosten, along with several colleagues from the Berlin Virology Institute at Charite Hospital, along with the head of a small Berlin biotech company, TIB Molbiol Syntheselabor GmbH, published a study claiming to have developed the first effective test for detecting whether someone is infected with the novel coronavirus identified first only days before in Wuhan. The Drosten article was titled, “Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR” (Eurosurveillance 25(8) 2020).

    The news was greeted with immediate endorsement by the corrupt Director General of WHO, Tedros Adhanom, the first non-medical doctor to head WHO. Since then the Drosten-backed test for the virus, called a real-time or RT-PCR test, has spread via WHO worldwide, as the most used test protocol to determine if a person might have COVID-19, the illness.

    On November 27 a highly-respected group of 23 international virologists, microbiologists and related scientists published a call for Eurosurveillance to retract the January 23, 2020 Drosten article. Their careful analysis of the original piece is damning. Theirs is a genuine “peer review.”

    They accuse Drosten and cohorts of “fatal” scientific incompetence and flaws in promoting their test.

    To begin with, as the critical scientists reveal, the paper that established the Drosten PCR test for the Wuhan strain of coronavirus that has subsequently been adopted with indecent haste by the Merkel government along with WHO for worldwide use–resulting in severe lockdowns globally and an economic and social catastrophe–was never peer-reviewed before its publication by Eurosurveillance journal. The critics point out that,

    “the Corman-Drosten paper was submitted to Eurosurveillance on January 21st 2020 and accepted for publication on January 22nd 2020. On January 23rd 2020 the paper was online.”

    Incredibly, the Drosten test protocol, which he had already sent to WHO in Geneva on 17 January, was officially recommended by WHO as the worldwide test to determine presence of Wuhan coronavirus, even before the paper had been published.

    As the critical authors point out, for a subject so complex and important to world health and security, a serious 24-hour “peer review” from at least two experts in the field is not possible. The critics point out that Drosten and his co-author Dr. Chantal Reusken, did not disclose a glaring conflict of interest. Both were also members of the editorial board of Eurosurveillance. Further, as reported by BBC and Google Statistics, on January 21 there were a world total of 6 deaths being attributed to the Wuhan virus. They ask, “Why did the authors assume a challenge for public health laboratories while there was no substantial evidence at that time to indicate that the outbreak was more widespread than initially thought?” Another co-author of the Drosten paper that gave a cover of apparent scientific credibility to the Drosten PCR procedure was head of the company who developed the test being marketed today, with the blessing of WHO, in the hundreds of millions, Olfert Landt, of Tib-Molbiol in Berlin, but Landt did not disclose that pertinent fact in the Drosten paper either.

    Certainly nothing suspicious or improper here, or? It would be relevant to know if Drosten, the Merkel chief scientific advisor for COVID-19, Germany’s de facto “Tony Fauci,” gets a percentage for each test sold by Tib-Molbiol in their global marketing agreement with Roche.

    False Positives?

    Since late January 2020, world mainstream media has inundated us all with frightening hourly updates on “the total number of coronavirus infected.” Usually they simply add each daily increase to a global total of “confirmed cases,” presently over 66 million. Alarming, but for the fact that, as Pieter Borger and his fellow scientific collaborators point out, “confirmed cases” is a nonsense number. Why?

    The Borger report identifies what they call “ten fatal problems” in the Drosten paper of last January. Here we take up the most glaring that can easily be grasped by most laypeople.

    Drosten & co. gave confusing unspecified primer and probe sequences. The critics note, “This high number of variants not only is unusual, but it also is highly confusing for laboratories. These six unspecified positions could easily result in the design of several different alternative primer sequences which do not relate to SARS-CoV-2… the confusing unspecific description in the Corman-Drosten paper is not suitable as a Standard Operational Protocol. These unspecified positions should have been designed unequivocally.” They add that

    “RT-PCR is not recommended for primary diagnostics of infection. This is why the RT-PCR Test used in clinical routine for detection of COVID-19 is not indicated for COVID-19 diagnosis on a regulatory basis.”

    Amplification Cycles

    But even more damning for Drosten is the fact that he mentioned nowhere of a test being positive or negative, or indeed what defines a positive or negative result! The Borger report notes, “These types of virological diagnostic tests must be based on a SOP (Standard Operational Protocol), including a validated and fixed number of PCR cycles (Ct value) after which a sample is deemed positive or negative. The maximum reasonably reliable Ct value is 30 cycles. Above a Ct of 35 cycles, rapidly increasing numbers of false positives must be expected… scientific studies show that only non-infectious (dead) viruses are detected with Ct values of 35.” (emphasis added).

    The WHO and Drosten recommend a Ct of 45 cycles and, reportedly, presently the German health officials do as well. Little wonder that as the number of tests is ramped up in the onset of winter flu season, PCR “positives” in Germany and elsewhere explode. As the critical authors point out, were the health authorities to specify 35 cycles maximum, the number of corona positive would be only less than 3% the present number! They note, “an analytical result with a Ct value of 45 is scientifically and diagnostically absolutely meaningless (a reasonable Ct-value should not exceed 30). All this should be communicated very clearly.

    It is a significant mistake that the Corman-Drosten paper does not mention the maximum Ct value at which a sample can be unambiguously considered as a positive or a negative test-result. This important cycle threshold limit is also not specified in any follow-up submissions to date.” The authors add,

    “The fact that these PCR products have not been validated at molecular level is another striking error of the protocol, making any test based upon it useless as a specific diagnostic tool to identify the SARS-CoV-2 virus.” (emphasis added).

    In simple English, the entire edifice of the Gates foundation, the Merkel government, the WHO and WEF as well as the case for de facto forced untested vaccines, rests on results of a PCR test for coronavirus that is not worth a hill of beans. The test of Drosten and WHO is more or less, scientific crap.

    Missing Doctor proof too?

    This devastating critique from twenty three world leading scientists, including scientists who have patents related to PCR, DNA Isolation and Sequencing, and a former Pfizer Chief Scientist, is damning, but not the only problem Professor Dr. Christian Drosten faces today. He and the officials at Frankfurt’s Goethe University, where he claims to have received his medical doctorate in 2003, are being accused of degree fraud.

    According to Dr. Markus Kühbacher, a specialist investigating scientific fraud such as dissertation plagiarism, Dr. Drosten’s doctor thesis, by law must be deposited on a certain date with academic authorities at his University, who then sign a legal form, Revisionsschein, verified with signature, stamp of the University and date, with thesis title and author, to be sent to the University archive. With it, three original copies of the thesis are filed.

    Kühbacher charges that the Goethe University is guilty of cover-up by claiming, falsely, Drosten’s Revisionsschein, was on file. The University spokesman later was forced to admit it was not filed, at least not locatable by them. Moreover, of the three mandatory file copies of his doctor thesis, highly relevant given the global importance of Drosten’s coronavirus role, two copies have “disappeared,” and the remaining single copy is water-damaged. Kühbacher says Drosten will now likely face court charges for holding a fraudulent doctoral title.

    Whether that is to pass, it is a fact that a separate legal process has been filed in Berlin against two people responsible for a German media site, Volksverpetzer.de, for slander and defamation, brought by a well-known and critical German medical doctor, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg. The court case demands of the defendants €250,000 in damages for defamation of character and material damages to Wodarg by the accused in their online site, as well as in other German media, claiming they viciously and without proof, defamed Wodarg, calling him a “covid-denier,” falsely calling him a right-extremist (he is a life-long former parliament member of the Social Democratic Party) and numerous other false and damaging charges.

    The attorney for Dr Wodarg is a well-known German-American attorney, Dr. Reiner Fuellmich. In his charges against the defendants, Fuellmich cites in full the charges against the Drosten test for coronavirus of Dr. Pieter Borger et al noted above. This is in effect forcing the defendants to refute the Borger paper. It is a major step on the way to refute the entire WHO COVID-19 PCR testing fraud. Already an appeals court in Lisbon, Portugal ruled on 11 November that the PCR test of Drosten and WHO was not valid to detect coronavirus infection and that it was no basis to order nationwide or partial lockdowns.

    If the stakes were not so deadly for mankind it would all be material for a comedy of the absurd. The world health Czar, WHO chief Tedros is no medical doctor whose WHO is financed massively by a college dropout billionaire computer manager, Gates, who also advises the Merkel government on COVID-19 measures.

    The Merkel government uses the Drosten PCR test and Drosten as an “all-wise” expert to impose the most draconian economic consequences outside wartime. Her Health Minister, Jens Spahn, is a former banker who has no medical degree, only a stint as a lobbyist for Big Pharma. The head of the German CDC, called the Robert Koch Institute, Lothar Wieler, is not a virologist but an animal doctor, Tierarzt. With this crew, Germans are seeing their lives destroyed by lockdowns and social measures never before imagined. There is science and then there is science. Not all “science” is valid however.

    *

    F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the online magazine “New Eastern Outlook” where this article was originally published. He is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization.
    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  36. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    avid (11th February 2021), Bill Ryan (8th March 2021), Bo Atkinson (11th February 2021), Creedence (14th March 2021), Icare (12th February 2021), onawah (11th February 2021), RunningDeer (11th February 2021), Satori (11th February 2021)

  37. Link to Post #1699
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,208
    Thanks
    47,680
    Thanked 116,091 times in 20,639 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  38. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (11th February 2021), Bill Ryan (8th March 2021), Icare (12th February 2021), onevoice (12th February 2021), RunningDeer (11th February 2021)

  39. Link to Post #1700
    Switzerland Avalon Member Helvetic's Avatar
    Join Date
    25th March 2010
    Posts
    3,578
    Thanks
    440
    Thanked 15,456 times in 3,208 posts

    Default Re: The Continuing Search For The Truth

    IN MEMORY OF CLIFFORD STONE | Bob Dean & Clifford Stone | Twilight of the Old Boys Network, March 5, 2012

    Source: projectcamelot.org



    IN MEMORY OF CLIFFORD STONE

    Video description:

    This is a video of several guerrilla style interviews with Bob Dean and Clifford Stone conducted over a 2 day period at the 2012 UFO Congress... Retired, Command Sergeant Major, Robert O. Dean and Retired, Sergeant Clifford Stone hadn't seen each other in some time. They are old friends and both have been given special access to the above top secret world of the military involving interaction with ETs of various races.

    In this once in a lifetime interview we get them together, at one place and time, sharing war stories and reminiscing about their encounters. I ask them the hard questions and attempt one more time to get them to reveal the true nature of the military involvement with ETs. What it means for humanity and where it is leading...as well as the fact that there are friendly and not so friendly visitors to this planet. Some who walk among us and down the halls of the Pentagon. -projectcamelot.org
    "Earth is currently restricted today for normal development of timeline progress. With us telling you everything would change everything."

    Website: Information Machine

  40. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Helvetic For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (8th March 2021), Bluegreen (12th February 2021), onawah (12th February 2021), RunningDeer (12th February 2021)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 85 of 168 FirstFirst 1 35 75 85 95 135 168 LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. the search for other worlds
    By mike1414 in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 4th February 2019, 22:31
  2. In Search of the Cabal
    By Dale in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 10th August 2010, 18:37
  3. The Secret Search for the Missing Columbus Map
    By Grizzom in forum Movies, TV, Books, and Popular Culture
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 28th June 2010, 01:04
  4. Encrypted Google search coming to a browser near you
    By giovonni in forum News and Updates
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 25th May 2010, 00:36
  5. To UK Truth Seekers "UKGC -- A Real Truth Movement"
    By TheTruth in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10th April 2010, 21:53

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts