Time Shifts & Time Slips

[markenty13]

Could anyone recommend any good books on the mandela affect/timeline slips, Stories, scientific facts etc.

This is fairly new to me but have been gripped by this post

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by markenty13 (here)
Could anyone recommend any good books on the Mandela effect/ timeline slips, Stories, scientific facts etc.

Good question!

Re the Mandela Effect, go to post #2 of this thread...

• Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

... for a large scale statistical study, well designed, that presents compelling evidence for something extremely odd that's clearly really happening.

[Magnus]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
.
A reference, and thinking/talking point:

• Timeline 1, variant 83: What may the future hold?
  http://projectcamelot.org/t1v83.html

This may be one of the most important whistleblower insights ever published on the net, but it's not been all that well recognized — maybe because it's simply so hard to understand or talk about.

It's about how Hillary was seen (seen), in 2007, by a classified advanced technology project group, to be elected president in 2008. That would have been a cataclysmic disaster — literally.

That was 'variant 83' of the new timeline. But that never happened.

Kerry Cassidy and I (and a very aware but utterly astonished friend, Dan Lux) listened to the entire unrecorded debrief in a noisy Las Vegas casino restaurant for 5 (five) hours. None of us were left with the slightest doubt that this was all completely real.

So —

• How come it changed?

• What 'variant' are we on now?

• And in this latest 2016 election, were the global controllers trying to get us back on that timeline — 8 years later? (My fairly strong personal guess is Yes. But that failed, too.)

The "Double-slit experiment" suggest that it would be hard if not impossible to foresee a specific solid state timeline or version thereof, as soon as the evaluating observer shift his focus, any previous prediction would dissolve. This could maybe explain why Timeline 1, variant 83 didn't come to pass as expected.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc

Listening to the C2C recording of "Paranormal investigator Jeff Belanger on Time Slips", Jeff plays with the idea that consciousness is faster than light.

The interviews with Dan Burisch is very interesting and captivating, yet there is some subtle thing about him and his information that doesn't fully pass my gut feeling. I'm tempted to guess that the gadgets Burisch and his collaborators allegedly used, would be less useful than a clairvoyant persons well honed consciousness, and still, any prediction made would be in flux.

"• And in this latest 2016 election, were the global controllers trying to get us back on that timeline — 8 years later? (My fairly strong personal guess is Yes. But that failed, too.)" - My guess is also that the controllers, very badly, want Timeline 1, variant 83 come into full effect, they likely does not have much power over controlling or predict timelines but they could still be skilled enough to be able to apply damage on an black-ops extraphysical level. The CERN scientists have found proof of "the god particle", clever guys, but they don't know what they don't know, and every action has a reaction, so did they in the process accidentally influence some unknown parameters essential to maintain the stability of the current timeline, possibly contributing to the Mandela effect?

[bluestflame]

lately seems the stitch in time sewing machine of the universe is on zigzag setting

[Enola]

I think one way they probably try to influence timelines is through popular culture. By influencing how we think and live and hoping it will take an effect. And things like the millennium/2012 shift, which was heavely promoted accross all media. There has got to be a reason for that.

[markenty13]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by markenty13 (here)
Could anyone recommend any good books on the Mandela effect/ timeline slips, Stories, scientific facts etc.

Good question!

Re the Mandela Effect, go to post #2 of this thread...

• Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

... for a large scale statistical study, well designed, that presents compelling evidence for something extremely odd that's clearly really happening.

Thanks Bill, will give this a read tonight

[Catsquotl]

What intrigues me is if it's the timeline that shifts. Or are we shifting our perception over to a different one.
The way I see it af all dimensions and timelines theroff exist NOW. Each time we maķe a choice we influence the outcome of a series of events. if all timelines need to come to their own conclusion all we can do is change the timeline we are on.

Which would mean that a part of ourselves is still on the old timeline experiencing the effect of a different choice.
Now if that is so. Does it matter at all?

[happyuk]

Fascinating thread. Whenever I think about timelines I am always reminded of the Scrooge example. It is somewhat trite, but I cant help but feel something similar is going on here.

Scrooge hates Christmas, happiness, generosity; he yells at his clerk for getting Christmas off with pay, tells off his nephew for inviting him to dinner, and chases away a guy collecting for charity.

He goes home and hallucinates that his doorknocker is the head of his dead partner.

Marley's ghost shows up to tells him to to change his ways or else and warns of more ghosts - past, present and future. The ghost takes Scrooge way back to see himself as a small sad little boy all alone at boarding school at Christmas. In the present the ghost shows scenes of the Cratchit family, who make up in love what they lack in money. In the future Scrooge sees a bunch of business dudes talking lightly about him, who has died, and in whom they clearly don't give a darn about, with no mourners. Plus some servants pawn a bunch of stuff stolen from him whom no one was protecting. And he sees the Cratchits who are overwhelmed by the death of Tiny Tim and the fact that the other kids have to work some horrible jobs.

Is something similar going on here perhaps, whereby instead of Scrooge freaking out and begging for another chance to fix his life, it is us, or the world leaders representing us, giving us the chance to make alternative decisions at this point in time...

[Jules]

This is a strange topic, and one that I am not sure how to communicate. I think there is something going on with time lines. About a week ago, after not eating anything during the day I woke up famished so I went to prepare some food in the kitchen about 2 am. i was making mac and cheese, then preparing something in the toaster oven to eat after pasta. After eating pasta, I looked at the time to check on the other snack and time was forwarded to 6 am. I was freaking out a little, how did I lose a few hours so early in the morning? It didn't make sense to me, and I have no explanation. Was it a time shift that I got caught up in, was it an alien abduction that I don't remember, or was it a brain trigger that I cannot explain... I know it sounds a little crazy, but this doesn't happen to me like this. I don't even know if I should even mention this anomaly. Maybe I won't feel so nuts if it has happened to someone else... I am going through times that I don't want to eat, then I want to eat like crazy. There are times that I don't sleep, then I want to sleep as much as possible. Is there something going on? I have nothing to explain these patterns that are different lately from my normal routine.

[happyuk]

This reminds me of the Bill Brockbrader interview with Kerry Cassidy.

Though Bill supposedly had 'weaknesses' (I'm still not 100% convinced, many whistle-blowers are set up for ridicule or worse) I think it would be a mistake to disregard the things he says, particularly about Timelines 1 and 2:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkIIBnIuXHM

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by happyuk (here)
This reminds me of the Bill Brockbrader interview with Kerry Cassidy.

Though Bill supposedly had 'weaknesses' (I'm still not 100% convinced, many whistle-blowers are set up for ridicule or worse) I think it would be a mistake to disregard the things he says, particularly about Timelines 1 and 2:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkIIBnIuXHM

Brockbrader sent me a couple of abusive and threatening e-mails, to which I never replied, so that told me all I felt I personally needed to know.

But the Timeline 1 and 2 thing (this is the core of the very complicated Dan Burisch story) is I think compellingly real. For those who don't know about this, or know much about it, here's my best stab at a summary.

If this is true — and I think it is — this is some of the most important core information there is to understand.

• Dan Burisch was a black ops microbiologist (yes, a very real one) and was favored and mentored by the then MJ-1 (head of MJ-12), Mike McConnell.

• I got to know Dan personally, and Kerry Cassidy and I had many off-record lunches, coffees and dinners with him. He was smart, funny, heart-centered, value-driven, genuine, real, and became a very good friend. He was a delightful person to be with. He utterly believed every bit of information he shared with us.

• When working on classified projects, he became privy to information, in the late 1990s/early 2000s, that there was set to be a huge planetary catastrophe to occur at an unknown date, but somewhere round about 2012, give or take a year or two.

• This catastrophe was known (he said) by two groups of human descendants, 52,000 years in our future. One group, in particular (the 'P52 Orions'), was really trying to reach back in time to help us.

• In those future humans' history, it was known that the trigger for the catastrophe (some kind of pole shift) was — my clumsy paraphrase — energetic particles in space that were somehow accidentally activated to some extreme by the action/influence of the time-portal devices (kind of stargate things) called 'The Looking Glass'.

• The remedy, the black ops guys were told by the 'ETs' (who were future humans), was to decommission and totally deactivate the Looking Glasses during a safe window of time, lasting several years. This was done, as an internationally agreed, quietly co-operative intervention.

• That catastrophic timeline (the one in the future humans' history) was known and referred to as Timeline 2.

• Because the catastrophe was avoided, we're NOW on a new timeline, which is Timeline 1.

• But even that timeline has different 'variants'. It's 'non-catastrophic' — from a big-picture planetary point of view — but still, some pretty bad things can happen (like nuclear war, and/or, not a joke, a Hillary Clinton presidency). See http://projectcamelot.org/t1v83.html for more detail.

• My own understanding — or, the way I explain/frame it for myself — is that a timeline is like a multi-lane freeway/ motorway/ autobahn/ autoroute. But within that freeway, there are many different lanes of traffic. That's very crude, and of course it's NOT exact at all (because some of the 'variants' are very different, and lead to very different outcomes!), but the simplistic analogy might help just a very tiny bit.

[Eric J (Viking)]

You know what they say Bill... 'all roads lead to Rome' ..

Viking

[happyuk]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by happyuk (here)
This reminds me of the Bill Brockbrader interview with Kerry Cassidy.

Though Bill supposedly had 'weaknesses' (I'm still not 100% convinced, many whistle-blowers are set up for ridicule or worse) I think it would be a mistake to disregard the things he says, particularly about Timelines 1 and 2:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkIIBnIuXHM

Brockbrader sent me a couple of abusive and threatening e-mails, to which I never replied, so that told me all I felt I personally needed to know.

But the Timeline 1 and 2 thing (this is the core of the very complicated Dan Burisch story) is I think compellingly real. For those who don't know about this, or know much about it, here's my best stab at a summary.

If this is true — and I think it is — this is some of the most important core information there is to understand.

• Dan Burisch was a black ops microbiologist (yes, a very real one) and was favored and mentored by the then MJ-1 (head of MJ-12), Mike McConnell.

• I got to know Dan personally, and Kerry Cassidy and I had many off-record lunches, coffees and dinners with him. He was smart, funny, heart-centered, value-driven, genuine, real, and became a very good friend. He was a delightful person to be with. He utterly believed every bit of information he shared with us.

• When working on classified projects, he became privy to information, in the late 1990s/early 2000s, that there was set to be a huge planetary catastrophe to occur at an unknown date, but somewhere round about 2012, give or take a year or two.

• This catastrophe was known (he said) by two groups of human descendants, 52,000 years in our future. One group, in particular (the 'P52 Orions'), was really trying to reach back in time to help us.

• In those future humans' history, it was known that the trigger for the catastrophe (some kind of pole shift) was — my clumsy paraphrase — energetic particles in space that were somehow accidentally activated to some extreme by the action/influence of the time-portal devices (kind of stargate things) called 'The Looking Glass'.

• The remedy, the black ops guys were told by the 'ETs' (who were future humans), was to decommission and totally deactivate the Looking Glasses during a safe window of time, lasting several years. This was done, as an internationally agreed, quietly co-operative intervention.

• That catastrophic timeline (the one in the future humans' history) was known and referred to as Timeline 2.

• Because the catastrophe was avoided, we're NOW on a new timeline, which is Timeline 1.

• But even that timeline has different 'variants'. It's 'non-catastrophic' — from a big-picture planetary point of view — but still, some pretty bad things can happen (like nuclear war, and/or, not a joke, a Hillary Clinton presidency). See http://projectcamelot.org/t1v83.html for more detail.

• My own understanding — or, the way I explain/frame it for myself — is that a timeline is like a multi-lane freeway/ motorway/ autobahn/ autoroute. But within that freeway, there are many different lanes of traffic. That's very crude, and of course it's NOT exact at all (because some of the 'variants' are very different, and lead to very different outcomes!), but the simplistic analogy might help just a very tiny bit.

Ouch. That kind of sums Brockbrader up for all of us I suppose. The Dan Burisch info is a lot more detailed and utterly captivating. Particularly about Hillary Clinton -I had been left decidedly uneasy by some of her aggressive anti-Iran rhetoric in the past thankfully she is now working towards a different kind of TODO list - hopefully.

[araucaria]

Posted by markenty13 (here)
Could anyone recommend any good books on the mandela affect/timeline slips, Stories, scientific facts etc.

This is fairly new to me but have been gripped by this post

Non-fiction: Adventures in Time: Encounters with the Past, by Andrew MacKenzie. See this post.

Fiction: an SF novel called October the First is Too Late by the astronomer Fred Hoyle (who coined the phrase ‘big bang’ in derision)

Time Slip by Graham Dunstan Martin:

After Dachau, by Daniel Quinn:

Some forum posts of mine and their threads:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post736455
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post799005
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post918234
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post723902
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post708071
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post703205
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post324315

[markenty13]

Posted by araucaria (here)

Posted by markenty13 (here)
Could anyone recommend any good books on the mandela affect/timeline slips, Stories, scientific facts etc.

This is fairly new to me but have been gripped by this post

Non-fiction: Adventures in Time: Encounters with the Past, by Andrew MacKenzie. See this post.

Fiction: an SF novel called October the First is Too Late by the astronomer Fred Hoyle (who coined the phrase ‘big bang’ in derision)

Time Slip by Graham Dunstan Martin:

After Dachau, by Daniel Quinn:

Some forum posts of mine and their threads:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post736455
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post799005
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post918234
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post723902
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post708071
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post703205
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post324315
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post736455

Appreciated Araucaria, Looking forward to diving into these

[Gillian]

I think there might also be mini- or even micro- timeline shifts. I think that an individual can experience a timeline shift that is personal and a collective can experience a timeline shift with an entire group experiencing it.

Bashar talks about this and suggests using it for breaking a habit. He suggests switching oneself to the timeline where one is not involved in the undesired habit.

I have been using the suggestion, "not in my timeline," for awhile. I didn't want Hillary to become president in my timeline so said it quite a bit before the election. According to Bashar, there will be a parallel timeline where she is president and Trump isn't. I have heard rumour that there are plans afoot to ensure that Trump doesn't come to power so I may yet be on the Hillary-is-president timeline.

A friend wrote a delightful autobiographical book called "Curiosity's Reward." In this book, he reviews his life of spiritual and metaphysical searching with accompanying anecdotes. The book is interesting, even if only for the references at the back. In this, Roy tells of a trip he made to visit two women about a metaphysical matter. The trip required quite a drive with a challenging bit of road along the way. When Roy arrived at the first house, there was nobody home. He then went to the second house. Nobody there either. He returned to the first house, then back to the second house -- he'd come a long way -- and finally gave up and returned home. He then phoned these two women and learned that they had been home all along, waiting for his arrival. He asked his guides what had happened and got the message that they had switched him to a different timeline because they wanted him to get back home before a disaster occurred on the tricky bit of highway.

I think it was Bashar who gave this example: one looks on the table for one's car keys where one is certain one has left them. They are not there. One goes to look for them elsewhere. Upon returning to the area by the table, one sees that one's keys are on it. Bashar says that one switched timelines between the keys not being on the table and being on the table.

I have had two major timeline shifts, I think. Both at work. Both caused by the schedule changing part way through a week. Both times, I knew that I had worked several days that were totally different to what was on the schedule. It is impossible to work a shift one is not scheduled to do because the supervisors will not have instructions for you. On these two occasions, I worked the new schedule from mid-week which was totally different to the one I had written down. Both were at a time when I needed a little extra cash for car insurance, etc, and both times, my pay cheque was larger than it should have been had I worked the original posted schedule. Although it took me 24 hours to calm down the adrenalin and get into my stride again when both these timelines changed, I was eventually thankful for the extra pay.

I also tried to subtly ask some people about certain little events that happened while I was working shifts earlier in the week, just to test if we had been on the same timeline. They were clueless. So I guess something odd really did happen.

Angela Donovan. She is an English, I think, maybe Irish medium. She has photographs of shifting timelines and talks about them a lot.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Angela Donovan. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_MZRw5xlhx0&t=1s
Awake and Aware Conference, Malta, Summer 2016.
In her presentation are photos of shifting timelines.

[Selene]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Brockbrader sent me a couple of abusive and threatening e-mails, to which I never replied, so that told me all I felt I personally needed to know.

But the Timeline 1 and 2 thing (this is the core of the very complicated Dan Burisch story) is I think compellingly real. For those who don't know about this, or know much about it, here's my best stab at a summary.

If this is true — and I think it is — this is some of the most important core information there is to understand.

• Dan Burisch was a black ops microbiologist (yes, a very real one) and was favored and mentored by the then MJ-1 (head of MJ-12), Mike McConnell.

• I got to know Dan personally, and Kerry Cassidy and I had many off-record lunches, coffees and dinners with him. He was smart, funny, heart-centered, value-driven, genuine, real, and became a very good friend. He was a delightful person to be with. He utterly believed every bit of information he shared with us.

• When working on classified projects, he became privy to information, in the late 1990s/early 2000s, that there was set to be a huge planetary catastrophe to occur at an unknown date, but somewhere round about 2012, give or take a year or two.

• This catastrophe was known (he said) by two groups of human descendants, 52,000 years in our future. One group, in particular (the 'P52 Orions'), was really trying to reach back in time to help us.

• In those future humans' history, it was known that the trigger for the catastrophe (some kind of pole shift) was — my clumsy paraphrase — energetic particles in space that were somehow accidentally activated to some extreme by the action/influence of the time-portal devices (kind of stargate things) called 'The Looking Glass'.

• The remedy, the black ops guys were told by the 'ETs' (who were future humans), was to decommission and totally deactivate the Looking Glasses during a safe window of time, lasting several years. This was done, as an internationally agreed, quietly co-operative intervention.

• That catastrophic timeline (the one in the future humans' history) was known and referred to as Timeline 2.

• Because the catastrophe was avoided, we're NOW on a new timeline, which is Timeline 1.

• But even that timeline has different 'variants'. It's 'non-catastrophic' — from a big-picture planetary point of view — but still, some pretty bad things can happen (like nuclear war, and/or, not a joke, a Hillary Clinton presidency). See http://projectcamelot.org/t1v83.html for more detail.

• My own understanding — or, the way I explain/frame it for myself — is that a timeline is like a multi-lane freeway/ motorway/ autobahn/ autoroute. But within that freeway, there are many different lanes of traffic. That's very crude, and of course it's NOT exact at all (because some of the 'variants' are very different, and lead to very different outcomes!), but the simplistic analogy might help just a very tiny bit.

As someone who also got to know Dan Burisch a dozen years ago and who has watched the timeline issue fairly carefully since, I wanted to share my understanding – and it is only mine – of how Dan perceived the TI vs. T2 timeline issue going forward. (Dan, if you’d like to contact me to comment further, Squirrel knows where to find me. Will be happy to correct the record.)

• Hilary Clinton’s probable election was ‘seen’ by Looking Glass (T1 v83) to happen in 2008. In the original “preferred/best” outcome, she would die in office - Dan implied by assassination – and this personal sacrifice would forestall or alter some other more dire outcome going forward. Clinton was aware of her probable fate but chose to run anyway.

• Instead, the timeline began to twist. Looking Glass events have played out, but in an altered context:

• Obama received the nomination instead and he selected Clinton as his Sec’y of State so she continued to play a prominent role in world politics.

• She did undergo an assassination attempt in 2012 while flying on a secret mission to Iran, when she was shot in the head by one of her own SEAL guards but survived. The SEAL was killed in crossfire. (This is the true source of the coverup story that “she fell and injured her head…” Yeah. But there was a bullet already in it… And the injury has been the source of her neurological problems since.)


• So the key points of T1v83 did “sort of” occur, but the trajectory of the outcome was altered by other events introduced into the timeline.


• This alteration is part of the “braiding” of the timeline(s) that Brockbrader referred to. Brockbrader and others have suggested that these events are all small time streams that eventually feed into a greater – and more determined – river of destiny. I tend to agree.


Now that Clinton has lost the presidency – which was another Looking Glass keystone - a second time, I am presuming that the existing timeline or stream is widely altered from whatever was foreseen in 2000 going forward. Whether this is good or bad is unknown to me.

The tricky point is that these Looking Glass devices were to be decommissioned and sequestered until a certain energetic point in space/time had been safely passed. Dan had said this would occur around 2016-2017.

I am as certain as I can be that the moment the “all clear” is sounded, these devices are/will be back in operation.

In whose control they will be, however – the white hats or black – I have no idea. I’m sure there is an interesting war going on in the Pentagon regarding this.

My own personal sense, my own internal radar, is telling me that many established structures/concepts are slowly but irrevocably crumbling. And that while the score may be tied at the bottom of the ninth [American baseball analogy] we are still in the game. We can still win, but the game ain’t over yet, and we may even go into overtime.

Cheers,

Selene

[onawah]

If I'm not mistaken Selene, your narrative is portraying HRC in a much different light, someone willing to sacrifice herself for a better future for the planet, than the light we have been seeing her portrayed in of late, as a callous Luciferian, part a child trafficking ring, who was willing to risk the lives of countless others so that she could become POTUS.

Posted by Selene (here)

• Hilary Clinton’s probable election was ‘seen’ by Looking Glass (T1 v83) to happen in 2008. In the original “preferred/best” outcome, she would die in office - Dan implied by assassination – and this personal sacrifice would forestall or alter some other more dire outcome going forward. Clinton was aware of her probable fate but chose to run anyway.

• Instead, the timeline began to twist. Looking Glass events have played out, but in an altered context:

• Obama received the nomination instead and he selected Clinton as his Sec’y of State so she continued to play a prominent role in world politics.

• She did undergo an assassination attempt in 2012 while flying on a secret mission to Iran, when she was shot in the head by one of her own SEAL guards but survived. The SEAL was killed in crossfire. (This is the true source of the coverup story that “she fell and injured her head…” Yeah. But there was a bullet already in it… And the injury has been the source of her neurological problems since.)

[Selene]

Posted by onawah (here)
If I'm not mistaken Selene, your narrative is portraying HRC in a much different light, someone willing to sacrifice herself for a better future for the planet, than the light we have been seen her portrayed in of late, as a callous Luciferian part of a child trafficking ring, who was willing to risk the lives of countless others so that she could become POTUS.

I don’t think it’s quite that simple, Onawah, although it could indeed be. The underlying issues seem to me to be more complex:

• To begin with, timeline T1v83 was assessed (I am paraphrasing here) ‘to be the best possible outcome…’ Yes, but for whom? The elite? Or the rest of humanity? Our planet or its Draco rulership and agenda of conquest?

We simply don’t know the motives or standards by which those who controlled the Looking Glass program were operating, nor for whom they were/are working. We don’t.

My money’s on the Draco-controlled Cabal who funded them and the entire secret space program and for whom Majestic – and Admiral J. Michael McConnell, Maj1 and Dan’s mentor and protector – worked. (I know nothing of McConnell’s personal motives, but he didn’t always tell the whole truth.)

So I’ve always been a bit suspicious of the total benevolence of T1v83 for the rest of us.

• Black ops operates via “the lie is different at every level”. So HRC might have been motivated by – and believed – that the sacrifice of her life would be “for the best.” But again, for whom?


Black ops always motivates people by telling them they are the ‘good guys’, because they know most people will not willingly do harm. The CIA lies. That’s their job.


So HRC could indeed believe she was working for humanity’s best interests. Or she could be aware of her true rulers and loyal to them. I don’t know. My crystal ball is cloudy here.

Cheers,

Selene

[Omi]

Thank you Bill for this thread, and for everyone's interesting input posts on timeline shifts. I've also been putting some of my thoughts onto this topic since few weeks ago.

Jules, thank you for sharing your experience, I can relate to it very much. Last week I've had few days where I would only eat an orange, an avocado and a few wheat crackers in the morning, and not feel hungry for the rest of the day. I probably slept 3-4 hours, and would not feel tired the following day. It was such a strange feeling.. I could feel some kind of light energy flowing through me, although I couldn't say exactly what that energy was. Then few days ago one of my colleagues who also has some knowledge on these metaphysical phenomenons whispered into my ear, "The gate is opening."

I'm pretty much back to my normal daily eating and sleeping habit now, but I also sense that the gate is now open for a possible shift to happen. Where it leads to and for how long it stays open is not clear, I should investigate further.