+ Reply to Thread
Page 25 of 27 FirstFirst 1 15 25 27 LastLast
Results 481 to 500 of 524

Thread: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

  1. Link to Post #481
    Scotland Avalon Member greybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Inverness-----Scotland
    Language
    English
    Age
    78
    Posts
    13,356
    Thanks
    32,618
    Thanked 68,863 times in 11,839 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Gwin Ru -- you sure post some interesting information
    Thank you
    Chris
    Be kind to all life, including your own, no matter what!!

  2. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to greybeard For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (10th June 2020), Franny (15th June 2020), Gwin Ru (22nd May 2020), palehorse (18th June 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020)

  3. Link to Post #482
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,261
    Thanks
    47,750
    Thanked 116,541 times in 20,693 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Autism Numbers Increase by 10 Percent in U.S.
    by TVR Staff
    Published May 24, 2020
    https://thevaccinereaction.org/2020/...ercent-in-u-s/

    "According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the number of children diagnosed with autism in the United States continues to increase. In a report published on Mar. 27, 2020, the CDC estimated the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in the country is now one in 54 children—up from one in 59 reported by the agency in April 2018, for an increase of nearly 10 percent.1 2 3

    The new rate is based on a 2016 survey of eight-year-old children across 11 residential communities in the U.S. that are part of an active ASD surveillance program known as the Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring (ADDM) network in the states of Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, Missouri, New Jersey, North Carolina, Tennessee and Wisconsin.1

    The old rate was based on a similar survey done in 2014.4

    Autism Prevalence in U.S. Could be Higher Than One Child in 54
    The one in 54 rate does not account for the number of eight year old children with an ASD diagnosis in 2017, 2018 and 2019, so the actual rate may be higher. In 2017, the National Health Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), which is the U.S. government’s principal health statistics agency, published health data for 2014-2016, which estimated autism prevalence for children aged 3-17 years at 1 in 36 in 2016, compared to 1 in 43 in 2015 and 1 in 45 in 2014.4

    The newly published CDC report said that boys were four times more likely to be diagnosed with autism than girls—the same ratio as in previous reports. It also found that ASD rates varied across the ADDM communities, with the highest registered in New Jersey (one in 32) and the lowest in Colorado (one in 76). It also found no difference in ASD rates for black and white children.1 2 3

    According to Stuart Shapira, MD of the CDC, “Some of the increase in autism prevalence might be due to the way children are identified, diagnosed and receiving services in their communities. The increase may also reflect reductions in racial differences in identification of autism.”3

    In the 1990s, One Child in 2,500 Had Autism in the U.S.

    In a 2018 article in The Vaccine Reaction, Rishma Parpia and Barbara Loe Fisher noted that autism was once a rare brain and immune system disorder but now has become common among children. They wrote: “In the 1990s, autism prevalence estimates ranged from one in 2,500 to one in 1,000 children. By 2000, the CDC estimated ASD prevalence was one in 150 children and, by 2006, it had increased to one in 110 children.”5 "

    References:

    ADDM, ASD, autism, Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring, autism spectrum disorder, Barbara Loe Fisher, CDC, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Colorado, Marco Cáceres, National Health Center for Health Statistics, National Vaccine Information Center, NCHS, New Jersey, NVIC, Rishma Parpia, Stuart Shapira, The Vaccine Reaction
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  4. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (10th June 2020), Chester (6th October 2020), Franny (15th June 2020), Gwin Ru (10th June 2020), Hym (17th June 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020)

  5. Link to Post #483
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,394
    Thanks
    40,387
    Thanked 33,771 times in 4,375 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    The Truth About Vaccines - All Nine Episodes.

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 1 | Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Interview (1:57:24)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/anVJq5mffggl

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 2 | What's In A Vaccines? Are Vaccines Effective? (1:32:55)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/WslPQ9HCCkAf

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 3 | Vaccinating For The Greater Good? (1:26:23)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/jmHynqlAMKYG

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 4 | HIB And Pneumococcal Vaccines And Herd Immunity (1:27:14)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/fEuuobohEjc9

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 5 | HPV And Hepatitis B Vaccines (1:23:21)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/69szcoASWtN8

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 6 | CDC, Chicken Pox, Rotavirus Vaccines (1:28:39)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/qsWrRHQGexCT

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 7 | Natural Immunization, Homeoprophylaxis, Freedom Of Choice (1:49:45)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/f01N41Hobfuo

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 8 | Censorship And Suppression (1:08:40)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/CIpSOtpr8UUF

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 9 | W.H.O.'s Not Telling the Truth? (1:19:09)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/vTtPxkszNeWe

  6. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (10th June 2020), Chester (6th October 2020), Franny (15th June 2020), greybeard (10th June 2020), Hym (17th June 2020), onawah (18th June 2020), palehorse (18th June 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020)

  7. Link to Post #484
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    7th August 2015
    Age
    48
    Posts
    209
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 216 times in 68 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    I haven't read the whole thread so there might be some repeated stuff here.


    This is some of the info I've found on this subject.

    Controversy Over Vaccine Research
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTh97pANTxc

    Review Of Critical Vaccine Studies: 400 Important Scientific Papers Summarized
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoT10nxZrVo

    https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/...7/364/b3a.jpeg

    Vaxxed From Cover Up to Catastrophe 2016
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nGxr...ture=emb_title

    VAXXED2
    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...76F8A88F074947

    Nurse Knows The Truth About Vaccines
    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...1&&FORM=VDRVRV


    https://www.projectcensored.org/us-m...caused-autism/
    (excerpt)
    ---------------------------------------------------------
    US Media Blackout: Italian Courts Rule Vaccines Caused Autism
    April 1, 2015
    Like the U.S., Italy has a national vaccine injury compensation program, giving financial support to those people injured by vaccinations. On September 23, 2014, an Italian court in Milan awarded compensation to a previously healthy boy for vaccine-induced autism after receiving three doses of GlaxoSmithKline’s Infanrix Hexa, a hexavalent vaccine administered in the first year of life to protect children from polio, diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis B, pertussis and Haemophilus influenza type B. In addition to these antigens, however, the vaccine also contained thimerosal, the mercury-containing preservative, aluminum, an adjuvant, as well as other toxic ingredients. The child regressed into autism shortly after receiving the three doses.

    Based on expert medical testimony, the court concluded that the child more than likely suffered autism and brain damage because of the neurotoxic mercury and aluminum in the vaccine as well as his particular susceptibility from a genetic mutation. Presiding Judge Nicola Di Leo considered another piece of damning evidence, a 1271-pageconfidential GlaxoSmithKline report. This industry document provided ample evidence of adverse events from the vaccine, including five known cases of autism resulting from the vaccine’s administration during its clinical trials.

    Two years earlier, an Italian court found that a Measles-Mumps-Rubella vaccine (MMR) had caused autism in a 15-month-old boy. Taken together, the court found that both the MMR and the hexavalent thimerosal and aluminum-containing vaccine could trigger autism. These court decisions flatly contradict the decisions from the U.S. vaccine court based on similar claims. The Italian press has devoted considerable attention to this decision and its public health implications, while the U.S. press has been silent.

    ------------------------------------------------


    It's really hard to find something objective on YouTube now. Here are some good alternatives.

    https://altcensored.com/search?q=vaccines
    https://search.bitchute.com/renderer...accines+Autism
    https://archive.org/search.php?query=vaccines%20autism


    This is a must-see.

    Doctors Who Discovered Cancer Enzymes In Vaccines All Found Murdered
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/6wudTuFr35ZP/

  8. Link to Post #485
    Avalon Member Delight's Avatar
    Join Date
    12th January 2012
    Posts
    6,090
    Thanks
    8,706
    Thanked 39,382 times in 5,726 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Poison poison poison equals catastrophe.


  9. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Delight For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (12th September 2020), Constance (11th July 2020), greybeard (17th June 2020), Hym (17th June 2020), onawah (17th June 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020)

  10. Link to Post #486
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    7th August 2015
    Age
    48
    Posts
    209
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 216 times in 68 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    The video at the bottom of post #485 only works some of the time so here are some other links to it.

    Doctors are Being Killed for Saving Your Children ~ Most Urgent!!!
    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...6FORM%3DHDRSC3

    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...5&&FORM=VDRVRV

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XYvLPCze_So


    It has a part 2.

    Doctors are Being Killed for Saving Your Children part 2
    https://www.bing.com/videos/search?q...B&&FORM=VDRVRV


    Part 2 seems a little far-fetched. Should this be taken seriously? What does everybody think?


    I googled the title of the video and got some articles.

    https://freedomoutpost.com/doctors-w...mHp3J-AhS3uHY8
    (excerpt)
    -----------------------------------------------------
    Nagalese prevents vitamin D being produced In the body
    Not long ago, Neon Nettle reported on the epidemic of doctors being murdered, most of which were in Florida, U.S. The scientists all shared a common trait, they had all discovered that nagalase enzyme protein was being added to vaccines which were then administrated to humans.(SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO)

    Nagalese is what prevents vitamin D from being produced in the body, which is the body’s main defence to naturally kill cancer cells.
    According to Thebigriddle.com: Nagalase is a protein that’s also created by all cancer cells. This protein is also found in very high concentrations in autistic children. And they’re PUTTING it in our vaccines!!
    Trending: CIA Whistleblower Kevin Shipp: ‘Hillary Clinton Was And Is Running A Global Financial Criminal Syndicate’
    This prevents the body from utilizing the Vitamin D necessary to fight cancer and prevent autism. Nagalese disables the immune system. It’s also known to cause Type 2 Diabetes. So basically…they weren’t killing these doctors because they had found the cure to cancer or were successfully treating autism… they’re killing them because these Dr’s had been researching and had the evidence that the vaccines they’re injecting our precious children with are CAUSING our current cancer and autism crisis!!

    And that it’s obviously being done knowingly and on purpose! The Dr’s they killed in FL had been collaborating and were getting ready to go public with the information.
    Depopulation 101..add poison to vaccines…make it law that all children must be injected to attend school. Slow kill methods. They think they’re being fair w/ their “survival of the fittest” type mentality. Only the best genes survive? These people have no souls.
    Dr Ted Broer broke it on The Hagmann & Hagmann Report and it took them a whole hour just to get him on air b/c their 3 hour show was brought down and every line they tried to use kept disconnecting…and then their servers were brought down.

    They asked a bunch of ppl to pray against the attack and then finally got him on a secured line..and so a full hour into the show they were finally back on the air and connected to Dr Broer and the first thing he said was “I am in no way suicidal.” He was super nervous holding onto this info…afraid he’d be taken out Hastings style before he got a chance to say it publicly. So listen to this short clip of him breaking the story.
    It’s a 19 min clip but the most important info is heard within the first 10 min. It is def some of the most important news I've ever heard. And it needs to go viral.

  11. Link to Post #487
    Avalon Member palehorse's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th April 2020
    Location
    Gaia
    Language
    English
    Age
    46
    Posts
    1,650
    Thanks
    12,222
    Thanked 11,563 times in 1,590 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Quote Posted by Gwin Ru (here)
    The Truth About Vaccines - All Nine Episodes.

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 1 | Robert F. Kennedy Jr. Interview (1:57:24)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/anVJq5mffggl

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 2 | What's In A Vaccines? Are Vaccines Effective? (1:32:55)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/WslPQ9HCCkAf

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 3 | Vaccinating For The Greater Good? (1:26:23)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/jmHynqlAMKYG

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 4 | HIB And Pneumococcal Vaccines And Herd Immunity (1:27:14)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/fEuuobohEjc9

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 5 | HPV And Hepatitis B Vaccines (1:23:21)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/69szcoASWtN8

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 6 | CDC, Chicken Pox, Rotavirus Vaccines (1:28:39)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/qsWrRHQGexCT

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 7 | Natural Immunization, Homeoprophylaxis, Freedom Of Choice (1:49:45)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/f01N41Hobfuo

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 8 | Censorship And Suppression (1:08:40)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/CIpSOtpr8UUF

    The Truth About Vaccines Episode 9 | W.H.O.'s Not Telling the Truth? (1:19:09)
    https://www.bitchute.com/video/vTtPxkszNeWe
    Wow, thanks. I was looking for it a week ago and they deleted from youtube. Downloading now.
    --
    A chaos to the sense, a Kosmos to the reason.

  12. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to palehorse For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (12th September 2020), greybeard (18th June 2020), Gwin Ru (18th June 2020), onawah (18th June 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020)

  13. Link to Post #488
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,261
    Thanks
    47,750
    Thanked 116,541 times in 20,693 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    TRUTH with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Episode 7
    7/9/20
    https://childrenshealthdefense.org/n...d-e952f4666aec

    "In Episode 7 of our weekly “TRUTH” series, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. talks with J.B. Handley, Author of “How to End the Autism Epidemic” about two of his recently CHD published articles “Lockdown Lunacy” and “Lockdown Lunacy 2.0”. The discussion tackles the herd immunity threshold of COVID and many other subjects of the day."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  14. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (12th September 2020), Chester (6th October 2020), Constance (11th July 2020), Gwin Ru (12th September 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020)

  15. Link to Post #489
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,394
    Thanks
    40,387
    Thanked 33,771 times in 4,375 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Growing Fear of Vaccines is Justified

    by Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz
    (henrymakow.com)
    September 11, 2020


    Vaccine hesitancy has gone mainstream. Less than 25% of Americans polled near the time of this writing stated they would get the approved vaccinations.

    "No vaccine containing genetic materials are safe, even if they were cleansed of poisonous heavy metals and toxic chemicals. VACCINES CAN NEVER BE MADE 'SAFE' BY REASON OF THEIR TOXIC INGREDIENTS. The evasion of this fact makes one complicit in genocide (besides demonstrating boundless stupidity)."

    Hijacked by the pharmaceutical industry, the field of medicine is now in the business of poisoning us. The mass media and government are accessories to this crime. Everyone concerned will make a bundle.

    Vaccine Hesitancy Goes Mainstream: Politicians and Drug Companies Go Bonkers!

    by Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz
    (henrymakow.com)

    As a world-leading 'anti-vaccinationist'-an honorable distinction denied me by vaccination proponents who prefer to evade and conceal my decades-long influence, and the vast majority of "anti-vaxxers" too who lamely proclaim "we're not opposed to vaccines, we just want to make them safer"-I declare victory over pandemic insanity and political hypocrisy.

    The absurdity that "fast-tracked" COVID-19 vaccines might be proved "safe" before, or soon after, the 2020 presidential election exceeds credulity. My allies' efforts to expose the delinquency in this delusion, and the 'unconscious' politicians promoting COVID-19 vaccines, are obviously succeeding 'against all odds.'

    The 'politicization' of COVID-19 vaccinationsdramatically exposes endemic stupidity and lethal fraud characterizing this entire industry and its political influence.

    For example, the vice-presidential candidate, Kamala Harris, classically demonstrated such unconscionable ignorance and official malfeasance on CNN when asked whether she would get a vaccine that was approved and distributed before the election. Harris replied,
    "Well, I think that's going to be an issue for all of us."

    "I will say that I would not trust Donald Trump and it would have to be a credible source of information that talks about the efficacy and the reliability of whatever he's talking about," she continued.

    "I will not take his word for it."
    Notice the word "safety" was not part of her vocabulary. Notice too that Harris omitted even the word vaccine from her diatribe smearing Trump, as though he was administering the injection.

    Harris deceptively evaded the most critical issue. The hypocrisy of considering "efficacy" and "reliability" without safety is absurd.

    But that's what's happening across the political spectrum. Pure deadly madness.

    REALITY CHECK
    NO VACCINE containing genetic materials are safe, even if they were cleansed of poisonous heavy metals and toxic chemicals. VACCINES CAN NEVER BE MADE 'SAFE' BY REASON OF THEIR TOXIC INGREDIENTS. The evasion of this fact makes one complicit in genocide (besides demonstrating boundless stupidity).

    But the wholesale undermining of intelligence in this field is clear and convincing of mass mind control. Politicizing red herrings, diversions that evade poisonous realities, generates campaign financing especially from Big Pharma and Big Biotech companies.

    Notice that synchronous with this stupidity and insanity spreading mainstream, 'damage control' was issued in a joint statement assuring COVID-19 vaccines will be safe and effective. Leading industrialists banking on genocide, the companies given billions of dollars in government grants, making trillions from vaccine injuries, genetic damage, and cancers-the world's leading moneymakers and population controllers-assured us by stating an impossibility!

    Their "vaccine safety and efficacy" is an oxymoron.

    DEADLY DESPICABLE PHARMA

    The group of nine leading companies that pledged to approve only "safe and effective" COVID-19 vaccines are full of the same monkey feces AstraZenca, Oxford, and Johnson & Johnson uses to make their false promises.

    Their obvious propaganda responds to unprecedented public distrust. Vaccine hesitancy has gone mainstream. Less than 25% of Americans polled near the time of this writing stated they would get the approved vaccinations.

    This new, monumental, life-saving victory for yours truly and my extended family of activists derives from the now widely held view that "the Covid-19 vaccine development process is politically tainted," press reports heralded.

    "Politically tainted?" Is this really news?

    Leading vaccine industrialists and propagandists have always been "politically tainted. The entire vaccine industry sources from the same political financiers that brought you all the world's wars. If you don't believe that, study political science and banking history to reprogram your brain.

    According to the industry's press release, the PhRMA giants pledged to "make the safety and well-being of vaccinated individuals our top priority."

    THIS PROMISE IS STUPID and DECEPTIVE beyond belief.

    Would any reasonably informed and intelligent person believe top executives at Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Johnson & Johnson, Sanofi, Novavax, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Pfizer and BioNTech would actually prioritize consumer health and safety above corporate profits?

    OF COURSE NOT!

    ASSURING SAFETY
    The PhRMA cartel assured civilization that the new vaccine developers would "continue to impose high ethical and scientific standards on the vaccine-testing process." They would apply for government authorizations only "after demonstrating safety and efficacy through a Phase 3 clinical study."



    The word "continue" is curious. The prospective pledge is dubious. Especially because network television already shows (in September 2020) mass production of COVID-19 labeled vials full of the not-yet-proven "safe and effective" vaccine that is being stockpiled and distributed to satisfy the "authorized" billion-dollar grants for "fast-tracked" orders.

    What's wrong with that picture?

    These "high ethical" concerns and "scientific standards" are reminiscent of previous disasters and scandals.

    Recall that AstraZeneca's "FluMist" nasal spray was similarly touted "safe and effective" before it was pulled from the market in 2016 for killing more people than it supposedly helped.

    Recall the FluMist vaccine's three percent efficacy. That did not surpass the double-digit percentage of people sickened and killed by this "injection-free" H1N1 Swine Flu remedy.

    Remember medical history. Merck's highly publicized polio vaccines produced masses of paralyzed polio victims, and their subsequent 'attenuated' virus caused pandemic cancers. If that's not bad enough Merck's hepatitis B vaccine given to gay volunteersin Greenwich Village, blacks in Central Africa, and Willowbrook State School mentally retarded children on Staten Island, delivered HIV/AIDS to the world.

    Was this "ethical" and "safe"? Was this "authorized"?

    --

  16. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (12th September 2020), Chester (6th October 2020), onawah (17th September 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020)

  17. Link to Post #490
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    34,395
    Thanks
    211,055
    Thanked 459,399 times in 32,916 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    In this post of a few hours ago, Wade Frazier highly recommended (and reviewed) this book:



    Here it is:
    Here's a copy of his excellent post:

    ~~~
    Hi:

    I have read many books over the years that challenge vaccination, and I just finished what may be the best I have read so far, by an MD in general practice, titled Vaccination: A Reappraisal. Like that women’s death camp book that I recently read, it is hard to know where to start. One day, I will update my medical racket essay again, and the vaccination section will get a little more work. The book did not tell me much that I was not already aware of, to one degree or another, but it was a tour de force in summarizing the issues, and it got pretty deeply into the details.

    The bottom line is that vaccination can’t take credit for vanquishing any disease, just like fluoridation’s promoters can’t make any credible claims as to its safety and efficacy. The author, Richard Moskowitz, made the standard observation that the childhood diseases that children are vaccinated against today - measles, mumps, chickenpox – have denied children’s immune systems the chance to use those diseases to develop. People who had those mild childhood diseases, like I did, got a lifetime benefit of a healthy immune system. Those who got vaccinated for them were doomed to a lifetime of chronic diseases. The reactions of the body to the real disease, versus the ersatz versions from vaccination, are completely different. With the real disease, the body reacts “acutely,” with fever and rashes, and when it is over, the body’s immune response ends, but it will never get those illnesses again. It learned from the experience. With vaccination, the body continues to put out antibodies as if it still has the illness, the immune system is tricked and overworked and, eventually, it begins to attack normal cells, which leads to autoimmune disorders. There is a great deal of evidence for that.

    Vaccination: A Reappraisal is essentially a more professional version of my medical racket essay, written by an MD. He cited a lot of the same authors and evidence that I do. Moskowitz wrote at length on the corruption of the CDC, and how Big Pharma is a pure racket anymore.

    Anybody who denies the link between vaccination and autism is ignorant, gullible, or lying. Autism is only one of many neurological disorders linked to vaccination. Of the many incredible statistics in Vaccination: A Reappraisal, the most shocking may have been that more than 25% of all American adolescents and young adults have some form of brain damage, per the CDC’s own statistics. Autism incidence has increased 40-fold in the past 40 years, and the largely unvaccinated Amish have less than 2% the rate of autism that the general American population does. There have been several studies of unvaccinated populations, and they have greatly reduced chronic conditions, of anywhere from half to 10% of the vaccinated population or less, such as in a study in New Zealand, while 5% of the vaccinated surveyed had their tonsils removed, none of the unvaccinated did.

    In the end, Moskowitz said that the issue was largely one of capitalism run amuck, with this kind of religious faith among the proponents of vaccination, when they did not have awesome conflicts of interest. As with alternative cancer treatment, the racket is alive and well, and witch hunts are mounted on doctors and scientists who dissent from the dogma, some of which Moskowitz chronicled. Since the medical racket is one of the global cartels, the “capitalism on steroids” aspect of it is very familiar.

    I won’t be lining up to get my COVID-19 vaccine.

    Best,

    Wade

  18. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    7alon (22nd September 2020), Alan (22nd September 2020), Anka (7th October 2020), Chester (6th October 2020), ClearWater (22nd September 2020), Elainie (22nd September 2020), Gwin Ru (22nd September 2020), Harmony (22nd September 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), Yoda (22nd September 2020)

  19. Link to Post #491
    Croatia Administrator Franny's Avatar
    Join Date
    3rd January 2011
    Location
    Island Time
    Posts
    3,151
    Thanks
    53,285
    Thanked 14,320 times in 2,100 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Very interesting they have a major mainstream study. It will be interesting to see if the information goes mainstream news as well.


    Large study concludes mercury can now be listed “as a cause of autism”

    In Brief

    The Facts: A new study published in Pediatric Health Medicine and Therapeutics concludes that there is "as significant relationship between mercury and autism." Enough for it to be listed as a cause of autism.

    Reflect On: Why is our environment so polluted with mercury and other toxic substances and heavy metals? Why do we use mercury in some of our health products and services?

    What Happened: A new study published in Pediatric Health Medicine and Therapeutics has concluded that there is “as significant relationship between mercury concentration and autism. Thus, the concentration of mercury can be listed as a pathogenic cause (disease-causing) for autism. The study also found significant amounts of lead exist within the brains of people with autism.

    As the study explains: In this study, searching Scopus, PubMed, and Science Direct databases, 18 articles conducted in different countries from 1982 to 2019 were collected. Studies’ heterogeneity was investigated using the I2 index. The data were analyzed using R and STATA software.

    In these 18 studies, 1797 patients (981 cases and 816 controls) aged 2 to 16 years were examined. Concentration of the samples (blood, hair, and nails) for both case and control groups was evaluated. There was no significant relationship between copper concentration and autism (SMD (95% CI): 0.02 (− 1.16,1.20); I2=97.7%; P=0.972); there was a significant relationship between mercury concentration and autism (SMD (95% CI): 1.96 (0.56,3.35); I2=98.6%; P=0.006); there was also a significant relationship between lead concentration and autism (SMD (95% CI): 2.81 (1.64,3.98); I2=97.8%; P=0.000).

    This is quite a significant finding, and complements other large studies. For example, a 2013 Meta-Analysis published in the Journal Bio Med Research International found that:

    “The studies upon which the CDC relies and over which it exerted some level of control report that there is no increased risk of autism from exposure to organic Hg in vaccines, and some of these studies even reported that exposure to Thimerosal appeared to decrease the risk of autism. These six studies are in sharp contrast to research conducted by independent researchers over the past 75+ years that have consistently found Thimerosal to be harmful. As mentioned in the Introduction section, many studies conducted by independent investigators have found Thimerosal to be associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Considering that there are many studies conducted by independent researchers which show a relationship between Thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders, the results of the six studies examined in this review, particularly those showing the protective effects of Thimerosal, should bring into question the validity of the methodology used in the studies.”

    Here’s a video from the University of Calgary showing how mercury damages the brain.

    In nature, toxic metals generally are bound with other elements rather than being present in their pure form. However, with the advent of large-scale industrial processes to extract metals from naturally occurring compounds, humans let the genie out of the bottle, contributing significantly to the distribution of mercury, aluminum and other heavy metals in the environment. When released from nature’s semi-protective hold, these “invariably toxic” metals wreak havoc on living systems, including humans, animals and plants alike.

    Modern-day scientists have been amassing evidence of mercury’s toxicity for decades, with a growing focus in recent years on the metal’s association with neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A new review article in the multidisciplinary journal Environmental Research pulls together a wide body of literature with the aim of summing up current research and emerging trends in mercury toxicology. Geir Bjørklund, the study’s lead author, is the founder of Norway’s non-profit Council for Nutritional and Environmental Medicine and has published prolifically on topics related to heavy metals, autoimmune disorders and ASD. – Robert F Kennedy Jr.

    Mercury is not the only issue.

    A paper published in 2018 discovered high amounts of aluminum in the brain tissue of people with autism. That particular paper has now been downloaded more than 1 million times. The study was conducted by Dr. Christopher Exley, considered to be one of the world’s leading experts in aluminum toxicology. He has looked at more than 100 brains, and the aluminum content in those with autism doesn’t compare at all to “normal” brains.

    He and a team of scientists from multiple countries recently published a paper in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology titled “The role of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines raises issues that deserve independent, rigorous and honest science.” In their publication, they provide evidence for their position that “the safety of aluminium-based vaccine adjuvants, like that of any environmental factor presenting a risk of neurotoxicity and to which the young child is exposed, must be seriously evaluated without further delay, particularly at a time when the CDC is announcing a still increasing prevalence of autism spectrum disorders, of 1 child in 54 in the USA.”

    Why This Is Important: Some people diagnosed with autism may be gifted, it’s a wide spectrum, and others may have suffered actual brain damage and other changes due to environmental factors. Autism has longed thought to be due to predominately genetic factors, but science and the growing prevalence of autism has show that heavy metals, herbicides, pesticides and more and should be strongly considered and looked into further.

    The Takeaway: Why does humanity live in a way that severely pollutes our environment? Is healthcare really bout healthcare, or does profit come first? What time of influence does the pharmaceutical industry have on medical policy and medical education? Why do we obey instructions handed down from something that has been exposed as extremely corrupt? Why do rely on others to solve our health problems instead of ourselves? How much of what we use as ‘medicine’ is actually necessary? Why do we live the way we live on our planet?

    By Arjun Walia / Collective Evolution Reporter
    A million galaxies are a little foam on that shoreless sea. ~ Rumi

  20. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Franny For This Post:

    Anka (7th October 2020), Bill Ryan (4th October 2020), Chester (6th October 2020), Constance (12th December 2020), Harmony (14th October 2020)

  21. Link to Post #492
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    34,395
    Thanks
    211,055
    Thanked 459,399 times in 32,916 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Quote Posted by Franny (here)
    Very interesting they have a major mainstream study. It will be interesting to see if the information goes mainstream news as well.


    Large study concludes mercury can now be listed “as a cause of autism”

    In Brief

    The Facts: A new study published in Pediatric Health Medicine and Therapeutics concludes that there is "as significant relationship between mercury and autism." Enough for it to be listed as a cause of autism.

    Reflect On: Why is our environment so polluted with mercury and other toxic substances and heavy metals? Why do we use mercury in some of our health products and services?

    What Happened: A new study published in Pediatric Health Medicine and Therapeutics has concluded that there is “as significant relationship between mercury concentration and autism. Thus, the concentration of mercury can be listed as a pathogenic cause (disease-causing) for autism. The study also found significant amounts of lead exist within the brains of people with autism.

    As the study explains: In this study, searching Scopus, PubMed, and Science Direct databases, 18 articles conducted in different countries from 1982 to 2019 were collected. Studies’ heterogeneity was investigated using the I2 index. The data were analyzed using R and STATA software.

    In these 18 studies, 1797 patients (981 cases and 816 controls) aged 2 to 16 years were examined. Concentration of the samples (blood, hair, and nails) for both case and control groups was evaluated. There was no significant relationship between copper concentration and autism (SMD (95% CI): 0.02 (− 1.16,1.20); I2=97.7%; P=0.972); there was a significant relationship between mercury concentration and autism (SMD (95% CI): 1.96 (0.56,3.35); I2=98.6%; P=0.006); there was also a significant relationship between lead concentration and autism (SMD (95% CI): 2.81 (1.64,3.98); I2=97.8%; P=0.000).

    This is quite a significant finding, and complements other large studies. For example, a 2013 Meta-Analysis published in the Journal Bio Med Research International found that:

    “The studies upon which the CDC relies and over which it exerted some level of control report that there is no increased risk of autism from exposure to organic Hg in vaccines, and some of these studies even reported that exposure to Thimerosal appeared to decrease the risk of autism. These six studies are in sharp contrast to research conducted by independent researchers over the past 75+ years that have consistently found Thimerosal to be harmful. As mentioned in the Introduction section, many studies conducted by independent investigators have found Thimerosal to be associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Considering that there are many studies conducted by independent researchers which show a relationship between Thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders, the results of the six studies examined in this review, particularly those showing the protective effects of Thimerosal, should bring into question the validity of the methodology used in the studies.”

    Here’s a video from the University of Calgary showing how mercury damages the brain.

    In nature, toxic metals generally are bound with other elements rather than being present in their pure form. However, with the advent of large-scale industrial processes to extract metals from naturally occurring compounds, humans let the genie out of the bottle, contributing significantly to the distribution of mercury, aluminum and other heavy metals in the environment. When released from nature’s semi-protective hold, these “invariably toxic” metals wreak havoc on living systems, including humans, animals and plants alike.

    Modern-day scientists have been amassing evidence of mercury’s toxicity for decades, with a growing focus in recent years on the metal’s association with neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A new review article in the multidisciplinary journal Environmental Research pulls together a wide body of literature with the aim of summing up current research and emerging trends in mercury toxicology. Geir Bjørklund, the study’s lead author, is the founder of Norway’s non-profit Council for Nutritional and Environmental Medicine and has published prolifically on topics related to heavy metals, autoimmune disorders and ASD. – Robert F Kennedy Jr.

    Mercury is not the only issue.

    A paper published in 2018 discovered high amounts of aluminum in the brain tissue of people with autism. That particular paper has now been downloaded more than 1 million times. The study was conducted by Dr. Christopher Exley, considered to be one of the world’s leading experts in aluminum toxicology. He has looked at more than 100 brains, and the aluminum content in those with autism doesn’t compare at all to “normal” brains.

    He and a team of scientists from multiple countries recently published a paper in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology titled “The role of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines raises issues that deserve independent, rigorous and honest science.” In their publication, they provide evidence for their position that “the safety of aluminium-based vaccine adjuvants, like that of any environmental factor presenting a risk of neurotoxicity and to which the young child is exposed, must be seriously evaluated without further delay, particularly at a time when the CDC is announcing a still increasing prevalence of autism spectrum disorders, of 1 child in 54 in the USA.”

    Why This Is Important: Some people diagnosed with autism may be gifted, it’s a wide spectrum, and others may have suffered actual brain damage and other changes due to environmental factors. Autism has longed thought to be due to predominately genetic factors, but science and the growing prevalence of autism has show that heavy metals, herbicides, pesticides and more and should be strongly considered and looked into further.

    The Takeaway: Why does humanity live in a way that severely pollutes our environment? Is healthcare really bout healthcare, or does profit come first? What time of influence does the pharmaceutical industry have on medical policy and medical education? Why do we obey instructions handed down from something that has been exposed as extremely corrupt? Why do rely on others to solve our health problems instead of ourselves? How much of what we use as ‘medicine’ is actually necessary? Why do we live the way we live on our planet?

    By Arjun Walia / Collective Evolution Reporter
    In support of Franny's post above. Go to 10:20 in this new interview with Catherine Austin Fitts:
    1. 70% of American children have chronic disease.
    2. Children's IQ has dropped 7 points since mass vaccination started.
    She doesn't cite a study‚ but I'd suggest Fitts is to believed.


  22. The Following 10 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    Alan (7th October 2020), Anka (7th October 2020), Constance (12th December 2020), Franny (11th October 2020), gord (7th October 2020), Harmony (14th October 2020), onawah (8th October 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), Sue (Ayt) (7th October 2020), Yoda (8th October 2020)

  23. Link to Post #493
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,261
    Thanks
    47,750
    Thanked 116,541 times in 20,693 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    "Truth About Vaccines" three new episodes will be playing free online along with the whole series from Oct.13-23
    New episodes entitled:
    "Censorship & Suppression"
    "W.H.O.'s Not Telling the Truth?"
    "Vaccines 101 (Vanquishing the 'Vaccinati' with Veracity)"
    Register here: https://go.thetruthaboutvaccines.com/ttav/#registernow
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  24. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Constance (12th December 2020), Franny (11th October 2020), Harmony (14th October 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020)

  25. Link to Post #494
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    34,395
    Thanks
    211,055
    Thanked 459,399 times in 32,916 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Quote Posted by Franny (here)
    Very interesting they have a major mainstream study. It will be interesting to see if the information goes mainstream news as well.


    Large study concludes mercury can now be listed “as a cause of autism”

    In Brief

    The Facts: A new study published in Pediatric Health Medicine and Therapeutics concludes that there is "as significant relationship between mercury and autism." Enough for it to be listed as a cause of autism.

    Reflect On: Why is our environment so polluted with mercury and other toxic substances and heavy metals? Why do we use mercury in some of our health products and services?

    What Happened: A new study published in Pediatric Health Medicine and Therapeutics has concluded that there is “as significant relationship between mercury concentration and autism. Thus, the concentration of mercury can be listed as a pathogenic cause (disease-causing) for autism. The study also found significant amounts of lead exist within the brains of people with autism.

    As the study explains: In this study, searching Scopus, PubMed, and Science Direct databases, 18 articles conducted in different countries from 1982 to 2019 were collected. Studies’ heterogeneity was investigated using the I2 index. The data were analyzed using R and STATA software.

    In these 18 studies, 1797 patients (981 cases and 816 controls) aged 2 to 16 years were examined. Concentration of the samples (blood, hair, and nails) for both case and control groups was evaluated. There was no significant relationship between copper concentration and autism (SMD (95% CI): 0.02 (− 1.16,1.20); I2=97.7%; P=0.972); there was a significant relationship between mercury concentration and autism (SMD (95% CI): 1.96 (0.56,3.35); I2=98.6%; P=0.006); there was also a significant relationship between lead concentration and autism (SMD (95% CI): 2.81 (1.64,3.98); I2=97.8%; P=0.000).

    This is quite a significant finding, and complements other large studies. For example, a 2013 Meta-Analysis published in the Journal Bio Med Research International found that:

    “The studies upon which the CDC relies and over which it exerted some level of control report that there is no increased risk of autism from exposure to organic Hg in vaccines, and some of these studies even reported that exposure to Thimerosal appeared to decrease the risk of autism. These six studies are in sharp contrast to research conducted by independent researchers over the past 75+ years that have consistently found Thimerosal to be harmful. As mentioned in the Introduction section, many studies conducted by independent investigators have found Thimerosal to be associated with neurodevelopmental disorders. Considering that there are many studies conducted by independent researchers which show a relationship between Thimerosal and neurodevelopmental disorders, the results of the six studies examined in this review, particularly those showing the protective effects of Thimerosal, should bring into question the validity of the methodology used in the studies.”

    Here’s a video from the University of Calgary showing how mercury damages the brain.

    In nature, toxic metals generally are bound with other elements rather than being present in their pure form. However, with the advent of large-scale industrial processes to extract metals from naturally occurring compounds, humans let the genie out of the bottle, contributing significantly to the distribution of mercury, aluminum and other heavy metals in the environment. When released from nature’s semi-protective hold, these “invariably toxic” metals wreak havoc on living systems, including humans, animals and plants alike.

    Modern-day scientists have been amassing evidence of mercury’s toxicity for decades, with a growing focus in recent years on the metal’s association with neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). A new review article in the multidisciplinary journal Environmental Research pulls together a wide body of literature with the aim of summing up current research and emerging trends in mercury toxicology. Geir Bjørklund, the study’s lead author, is the founder of Norway’s non-profit Council for Nutritional and Environmental Medicine and has published prolifically on topics related to heavy metals, autoimmune disorders and ASD. – Robert F Kennedy Jr.

    Mercury is not the only issue.

    A paper published in 2018 discovered high amounts of aluminum in the brain tissue of people with autism. That particular paper has now been downloaded more than 1 million times. The study was conducted by Dr. Christopher Exley, considered to be one of the world’s leading experts in aluminum toxicology. He has looked at more than 100 brains, and the aluminum content in those with autism doesn’t compare at all to “normal” brains.

    He and a team of scientists from multiple countries recently published a paper in the Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology titled “The role of aluminum adjuvants in vaccines raises issues that deserve independent, rigorous and honest science.” In their publication, they provide evidence for their position that “the safety of aluminium-based vaccine adjuvants, like that of any environmental factor presenting a risk of neurotoxicity and to which the young child is exposed, must be seriously evaluated without further delay, particularly at a time when the CDC is announcing a still increasing prevalence of autism spectrum disorders, of 1 child in 54 in the USA.”

    Why This Is Important: Some people diagnosed with autism may be gifted, it’s a wide spectrum, and others may have suffered actual brain damage and other changes due to environmental factors. Autism has longed thought to be due to predominately genetic factors, but science and the growing prevalence of autism has show that heavy metals, herbicides, pesticides and more and should be strongly considered and looked into further.

    The Takeaway: Why does humanity live in a way that severely pollutes our environment? Is healthcare really bout healthcare, or does profit come first? What time of influence does the pharmaceutical industry have on medical policy and medical education? Why do we obey instructions handed down from something that has been exposed as extremely corrupt? Why do rely on others to solve our health problems instead of ourselves? How much of what we use as ‘medicine’ is actually necessary? Why do we live the way we live on our planet?

    By Arjun Walia / Collective Evolution Reporter
    ~~~

    Dr Mercola has now added his weight to this significant new research.
    Study Shows Significant Link Between Mercury and Autism

    Story at-a-glance
    • A September 2020 meta-analysis concludes there is a significant relationship between autism and concentrations of lead and mercury in the body.
    • According to the researchers, mercury concentration is a pathogenic cause for autism, meaning it’s a causative factor.
    • According to a 2014 review, there is evidence of malfeasance and conflicts of interest in studies claiming that thimerosal in vaccines is safe.
    • Serious flaws and errors also plague studies that claim aluminum in vaccines is safe. A mathematical error found in a key FDA study has reignited concerns about the safety of aluminum in vaccines.
    • Glutathione is the dominant agent that binds to and helps move mercury and other heavy metals out of your tissues. Part of effective detox involves upregulating your biochemistry to facilitate the mobilization and elimination of metals.

    (article continues here)

  26. The Following 11 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    Alan (14th October 2020), Constance (12th December 2020), Harmony (14th October 2020), Kryztian (14th October 2020), kudzy (15th October 2020), onawah (16th October 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020), Samson (14th October 2020), Sue (Ayt) (14th October 2020), Tintin (14th October 2020), Yoda (14th October 2020)

  27. Link to Post #495
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,261
    Thanks
    47,750
    Thanked 116,541 times in 20,693 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    There was no autism in Vietnam before Bill Gates brought his vaccines
    Dr Anthony Phan, MD
    300,281 views•Apr 18, 2020
    3.8KAndré Levy


    (It doesn't make mathematical sense that "there was no autism before, and now there's a 300% rise", but that there is autism now and there wasn't before the vaccines certainly does. No doubt the real numbers will be shared at some point.
    Last edited by onawah; 12th December 2020 at 18:05.
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  28. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (25th March 2022), Constance (12th December 2020), Reinhard (25th December 2020)

  29. Link to Post #496
    United States Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    7th August 2015
    Age
    48
    Posts
    209
    Thanks
    6
    Thanked 216 times in 68 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    I found some good info.
    https://vaccinetruth.org/index.html


    edit
    --------------------------

    I just came across this.
    http://www.chiropractic.org/wp-conte...-Prevail-3.pdf

    I've only scanned it but I'm posting it anyway. It looks promising.
    Last edited by Cosmored; 1st January 2021 at 19:17.

  30. Link to Post #497
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,394
    Thanks
    40,387
    Thanked 33,771 times in 4,375 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Blockbuster: CDC quietly removes website headline that claimed "Vaccines do not cause autism"

    Sharyl Attkisson
    sharylattkisson.com
    Fri, 22 Jan 2021 08:18 UTC


    After a court challenge questioning the scientific support behind the claim that "vaccines do not cause autism," the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) has removed that headline from its website.

    The blockbuster change was made quietly last August, and went largely unnoticed, with no public announcement.

    The CDC Vaccine-Autism page goes on to state in many different ways that parents should not be concerned about vaccines and autism, and "there is no link," while at the same time acknowledging a link cannot be ruled out.

    In a Question and Answer post, CDC says "more research is needed" on the question as to whether vaccines can trigger autism in children with "mitochondrial disorders." Scientists say many people have mitochondrial disorders but do not know it.
    More research is needed to determine if there are rare cases where underlying mitochondrial disorders are triggered by anything related to vaccines.
    According to CDC, mitochondria are like tiny power houses of almost all cells in the body, turning sugar and oxygen into energy needed to function.

    Read CDC vaccine safety information here.

    CDC Immunization Safety Official Acknowledged Possible Vaccine-Autism Link
    In an interview with me in 2014, CDC's head of immunization safety, Dr. Frank DeStefano, acknowledged it's possible that vaccines rarely trigger autism in some children, and said "somebody" should do research to identify why that might be. However, there is no easily-found record of CDC encouraging or funding any such research.

    Listen to Dr. DeStefano's interview here, and read a transcript.

    CDC and The Department of Justice Secretly Settled and Paid a Landmark Vaccine-Autism Claim
    In 2008, CDC secretly settled and paid a landmark vaccine-autism claim, acknowledging that vaccines triggered autism in a child named Hannah Poling, while publicly telling parents and the rest of the public there was no link. Poling's father is a pediatric neurologist. In paying the claim, CDC demanded the case be sealed. But the news leaked out.

    Hannah developed autism quickly after a doctor's visit where she received five shots-- - nine doses of vaccines. She quickly came down with a fever, seizures and severe health problems.

    Read more about Poling's story here

    The Government's Own Expert At The Time says Vaccines Can Cause Autism, After All

    We only learned recently that the government's own one-time lead expert in defending vaccine-autism claims in court, the world renowned pediatric neurologist Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, changed his expert opinion based on new science and concluded vaccines can-- and do -- cause autism, after all, in "exceptional" cases.

    In a sworn affidavit, Dr. Zimmerman says that when he informed the government (through Department of Justice attorneys who defend vaccine companies in court) that vaccines can cause autism, the government fired him as an expert witness and misrepresented his opinion in court to use against cases alleging vaccine-autism injuries.

    Dr. Zimmerman had treated Hannah Poling, the daughter of his colleague Dr. Jon Poling, and said the science he learned, in that case, was part of how he came to understand that vaccines can cause autism.

    Read Dr. Zimmerman's affidavit here.

    CDC Senior Scientist Gave a Sworn Statement saying He and His Colleagues Committed Scientific Fraud to Coverup Vaccine-Autism Link

    In 2014, a senior CDC scientist, Dr. William Thompson, blew the whistle and said he and his colleagues covered up a vaccine-autism association, particularly among African-American boys, identified in a study published in Pediatrics.

    Thompson testified in a sworn statement that he was present when his CDC colleagues and coauthors met and literally threw some of the data into a trash can. He says he saved original copies and put them in a safe, believing they had committed a crime by destroying the material. Others at CDC deny it.
    At the bottom of Table 7 it also shows that for the non-birth certificate sample, the adjusted race effect statistical significance was huge. All the authors and I met and decided sometime between August and September '02 not to report any race effects for the paper. Sometime soon after the meeting, we decided to exclude reporting any race effects, the co-authors scheduled a meeting to destroy documents related to the study. The remaining four co-authors all met and brought a big garbage can into the meeting room and reviewed and went through all the hard copy documents that we had thought we should discard and put them in a huge garbage can. However, because I assumed it was illegal and would violate both FOIA and DOJ requests, I kept hard copies of all documents in my office and I retained all associated computer files. I believe we intentionally withheld controversial findings from the final draft of the Pediatrics paper.

    From sworn statement by CDC's Dr. William Thompson
    After the controversy, CDC insiders say the agency quickly sought reanalyses to try to counter Dr. Thompson.

    At the same time, propagandists who write on point with the vaccine industry, such as Seth Mnookin, Dr. Gorski of Scienceblogs.com ("Respectful Insolence"), and authors at Snopes, Vox, Wikipedia and even The Washington Post attacked and controversialized Dr. Thompson, implying the well-regarded CDC scientist was actually an anti-vaccine nut.

    Read more reporting on vaccine safety and other medical issues here.

    Dr. Thompson and the controversy, along with secretly recorded audiotapes, are the subject of the documentary VAXXED.

    VAXXED has largely been censored from the Internet, and controversialized by propaganda groups such as Media Matters, which is aligned with the interests of the vaccine industry, and smears scientists and journalists who are off the narrative.

    VAXXED was also widely attacked by authors and publications on point with the vaccine industry, such as Michael Hiltzik of the LA Times, and Deadline.com.

    Though Dr. Thompson, one of the study's authors, admitted or claimed he and his colleagues had committed scientific fraud, the journal Pediatrics declined to retract the questioned study, or even note the fraud what one of the authors was claiming.

    A Pediatrics spokesman told me, when I asked, that since Dr. Thompson's CDC co-authors had denied committing scientific fraud, there was no need to retract the article.

    The journal said it did not contact or interview Dr. Thompson about his claims.

    A CDC post about the controversy acknowledges the study's findings that found an association between vaccines and autism, without addressing Dr. Thompson's data and claims. But the official CDC position theorizes that the apparent association was just coincidental.
    The findings revealed that vaccination between 24 and 36 months was slightly more common among children with autism, and that association was strongest among children 3-5 years of age. The authors reported this finding was most likely a result of immunization requirements for preschool special education program attendance in children with autism.

    CDC on 2004 study controversy in which a co-author admitted fraud
    Read more on the study from CDC and the controversy at the link below:
    • CDC Statement: 2004 MMR and Autism Study
    • Read the correction of a story regarding government vaccine expert and vaccine inventor Dr. Paul Offit, who made false claims about a CBS report exposing industry ties to Every Child By Two and other groups.
    • Read the CBS story Dr. Offit made false claims about.
    Watch the video here.
    Read the account below of "Informed Consent Action Network" (ICAN) regarding its lawsuit to stop CDC from claiming "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism."
    ICAN, through its attorneys led by Aaron Siri, has been relentless in its legal demands and actions to compel the CDC to remove its blanket claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism" from its website.

    We are excited to report that the CDC has finally capitulated to those demands! It has removed this claim from its website! CDC's Autism-Vaccine Page


    Old Version vs. New Version

    The more than three-year journey for how ICAN, and its legal team, achieved this result is a story of determined persistence. Here are the highlights.

    ICAN's Opening Salvo (Oct. 12, 2017 - Dec. 31, 2018)
    The journey began with a letter sent to the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS) on October 12, 2017. That letter explained why the CDC cannot scientifically claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism" on its website. ICAN then ended with the following demand:
    "Please confirm that HHS shall forthwith remove the claim that 'Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism' from the CDC website, or alternatively, please identify the specific studies on which HHS bases its blanket claim that no vaccines cause autism?"
    To put HHS and the CDC (an agency within HHS) on their heels, mere days after sending this letter, ICAN also sent a FOIA request on November 1, 2017, demanding: All reports, scientific studies, and any other documents the CDC relied upon to support the assertion "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism" located on its website

    The CDC quickly called ICAN's counsel, Aaron Siri, regarding this request. After some negotiations, the CDC formally responded on November 7, 2017, stating that "A search of our records failed to reveal any documents beyond the records hyperlinked in the specific web site" to support the claim that vaccines do not cause autism.

    The CDC had thus revealed a truth, one that HHS could not run from in its response to ICAN's letter. On January 18, 2018, HHS responded to ICAN's October 12th letter. In that letter, HHS provided a list of studies it said supported the conclusion on its website that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism." All of the studies cited related either to a single vaccine, MMR, or to a single vaccine ingredient, thimerosal. None of these studies support the claim that vaccines given during the first six months of life do not cause autism. Given that HHS failed to support its claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism," ICAN responded by letter dated December 31, 2018 wherein ICAN asserted that "HHS cannot scientifically claim that 'Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism'" and "must therefore remove this claim from the CDC website until it can produce the studies to support the claim."

    ICAN's Pincer Maneuver (Jan. 1, 2019 to June 18, 2019)
    In order to keep the pressure on to force the CDC to be honest with the public, during the first six months of 2019, ICAN submitted numerous requests for communications among key personnel within the CDC relating to autism. Some of these requests sought emails going back decades. The key players within the CDC with regard to vaccines and autism now knew we were watching, and that we would have their unvarnished, internal emails related to autism.

    ICAN Drops the Gauntlet (June 19, 2019 to Dec. 30, 2019)
    Now that ICAN had gathered the proof in the form of evidence and admissions it needed to hold the CDC's feet to the fire, on June 19, 2019, ICAN demanded that the CDC produce copies of the studies it relies upon to claim that all the vaccines given during the first six months of life "Do Not Cause Autism." These vaccines include DTaP, HepB, Hib, PCV13, and IPV. ICAN also demanded that the CDC produce studies to support that the cumulative exposure to these vaccines during the first six months of life "Do Not Cause Autism."

    ICAN, of course, already had the CDC's admissions on these points from its prior FOIA request in November 2017, the HHS letter exchange, and the CDC's internal emails. The CDC had nowhere to hide and no way to dissemble. As expected, it responded to ICAN's request with the same list of studies involving MMR or thimerosal. Not a single study supported that DTaP, HepB, Hib, PCV13, and IPV do not cause autism.

    ICAN Battles the CDC in Court (Dec. 31, 2019 to March 5, 2020)
    ICAN then put the pressure directly on the CDC. Instead of walking away after the CDC effectively admitted it did not have the studies ICAN sought, ICAN sued the CDC in federal court. The suit focused on the CDC's claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism" on the basis that the CDC had not specifically listed the precise studies that it asserts support that claim.

    This lawsuit also quoted from the deposition of Dr. Stanley Plotkin, the godfather of vaccinology, who admitted under oath that he was
    "okay with telling the parent that DTaP/Tdap does not cause autism even though the science isn't there yet to support that claim."
    After a lot of wrangling between ICAN's counsel Aaron Siri, and the Department of Justice, which was representing the CDC, the CDC finally capitulated and signed a stipulation that was entered as an order of the court on March 2, 2020in which the CDC identified 20 studies as the universe of support it relies upon to claim that DTaP, HepB, Hib, PCV13, and IPV do not cause autism.

    Here is a summary of the vaccines these studies cover:
    1 relating to MMR (not a vaccine ICAN asked about);· 13 relating to thimerosal (not an ingredient in any vaccine ICAN asked about);· 4 relating to both MMR and thimerosal;· 1 relating to antigen (not a vaccine) exposure; and· 1 relating to MMR, thimerosal, and DTaP. Incredibly, the one study relating to DTaP on the CDC's list was a recent review by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), paid for by the CDC, which conducted a comprehensive review looking specifically for studies relating to whether DTaP does or does not cause autism. The IOM concluded that it could not identify a single study to support that DTaP does not cause autism.

    Instead, the only relevant study the IOM could identify found an association between DTaP and autism. In other words, the only study the CDC listed that actually looked at any of the vaccines given to babies during the first six months of life concluded that there are no studies to support that DTaP does not cause autism.

    Yet, the CDC chose that study as one of the few that supports its claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism"! This reality is truly incredible because, when it comes to autism, vaccines are the one suspected culprit that the CDC claims to have exhaustively investigated but, yet, the CDC could not provide a single study to support its conclusion that the vaccines given during the first six months of life do not cause autism. The CDC regularly complains that those raising concerns about vaccine safety are unscientific and misinformed. It is therefore truly stunning that when we asked the CDC for studies to support its claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism," the March 2, 2020 stipulation and order made it abundantly clear that it was the CDC's own claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism" that was unscientific.

    ICAN's Coup de Grâce (Mar. 6, 2020 to Aug. 26, 2020)
    And now for the coup de grâce. ICAN's demands at the end of 2019 and over which it took the CDC to court in early 2020 were for the studies the CDC "relied upon" to claim that Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism. ICAN now had a court ordered stipulation that specifically listed the twenty studies the CDC "relied upon" to support this claim - none of which supported that the vaccines given during the first six months of life do not cause autism.

    To assure that the CDC understood ICAN was never, ever, ever, letting this issue go, on March 6, 2020 (days after concluding the federal lawsuit) ICAN submitted the following FOIA demand to the CDC: "All studies supporting the claim that DTaP does not cause autism" and days later requested "Studies created or retained by CDC to support the claim that DTaP does not cause autism." The difference between this and ICAN's prior requests is subtle but powerful.

    Instead of asking for the studies, the CDC "relied upon" to support that DTaP does not cause autism (as it did previously), ICAN was now seeking the studies that in fact support that DTaP does not cause autism. In response to this request, the CDC could not list its MMR or thimerosal studies - its hands were tied. It understood there was nowhere left to hide its unsupported claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism." And it knew that ICAN would again take it to court, and this time the outcome could be even harsher.

    The CDC Capitulates
    On the heels of the foregoing, and dozens of related demands regarding autism that ICAN continued to press, in the dead of the night, and without any fanfare or announcement, on August 27, 2020, the CDC website removed the claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism" from its website!

    The CDC had finally capitulated to the truth! Compare for yourself the CDC's autism-vaccine webpage on August 26, 2020 versus August 27, 2020. You may be wondering why we waited until now to announce this amazing news. Well, ICAN and its legal team have been so busy fighting on dozens of vaccine related fronts (mandatory MMR vaccines, flu shot requirements, improper COVID vaccine trials, etc.) that we only realized the CDC's vaccine-autism claim had been removed when we recently turned back to that front! Like a Mayan temple hidden in plain sight for hundreds of years, ICAN only recently discovered the CDC's silent capitulation.

    The Future
    The most recent data from CDC shows that 1 in 36 children born this year in the United States will develop autism. This is a true epidemic. If the CDC had spent the same resources studying vaccines and autism as it did waging a media campaign against parents that claim vaccines caused their child's autism, the world would be a better place for everyone.

    To their credit, parents with autistic children have never backed down. In the face of incessant brow beatings by public health authorities, studies have found between 40% and 70% of parents with an autistic child continue to blame vaccines for their child's autism, typically pointing to vaccines given during the first six months of life. These parents know what they experienced, what their parental instincts tell them, and no amount of shaming can change that truth. With the removal of the claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism," it is ICAN's sincere hope that our public health authorities have turned or will soon be turning the corner on this issue.

    That they will fund independent scientists to conduct the desperately needed studies of autism and the cumulative impact of the vaccines given during the first six months of life. The cries of parents who know that vaccines caused their child's autism should no longer be ignored. The science must be done. And ICAN will continue to fight to make sure that that it is done.

    Epilogue
    The CDC's website does continue to claim that "Vaccine ingredients do not cause autism" and so ICAN's fight continues! Our next step will be to force the CDC to admit whether or not they are also making this claim for aluminum adjuvants used in vaccines. And if so, to produce the studies to support this claim. (See ICAN's white paper on aluminum adjuvants and autism here.)

    Of course, whether one or more ingredients, like water used in vaccines, does not cause autism is not really the issue. The question is whether the vaccine, the product itself as formulated, causes autism. And we now know that the CDC finally understands that it can no longer claim that "Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism."

    Related:

  31. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (25th March 2022), Constance (16th February 2021), Delight (25th January 2021)

  32. Link to Post #498
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    3rd July 2018
    Posts
    4,394
    Thanks
    40,387
    Thanked 33,771 times in 4,375 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    CDC admits 98 million Americans were given cancer virus via the polio shot

    Author Q
    Posted on February 10, 2021
    The CDC has admitted that between 1955–1963 over 98 million Americans received one or more doses of a polio shot which was contaminated with a cancer-causing virus called Simian vacuolating virus 40 (SV40). The CDC quickly took down the page, along with Google, but the site was luckily cached and saved to symbolize this grand admission.


    To further confirm this unbelievable admission, Assistant Professor of Pathology at Loyola University in Chicago Dr. Michele Carbone has been able to independently verify the presence of the SV40 virus in tissue and bone samples from patients who died during that era.

    He found that 33% of the samples with osteosarcoma bone cancers, 40% of other bone cancers, and 60% of the mesothelioma’s lung cancers all contained this obscure virus.

    This leaves the postulation that upwards of 10–30 million actually contracted and were adversely affected by this virus, to be deadly accurate.

  33. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Gwin Ru For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (25th March 2022), Constance (16th February 2021), onawah (23rd February 2021), Tintin (16th February 2021)

  34. Link to Post #499
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,261
    Thanks
    47,750
    Thanked 116,541 times in 20,693 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Nonprofit to File Lawsuit Against CDC Over Statement That Vaccines Do Not Cause Autism
    BY MEILING LEE
    February 21, 2021
    https://www.theepochtimes.com/nonpro...g-2021-02-21-2

    Del Bigtree, founder of ICAN, says the nonprofit will file a lawsuit against the CDC regarding the claim that vaccines do not cause autism. (Courtesy of icandecide.org)

    "Del Bigtree, founder of the Informed Consent Action Network (ICAN) said his organization will file a lawsuit against the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to request the federal agency take down its statement that claims vaccines do not cause autism from its webpage on autism and vaccines.

    “There is no science to back up the statement as far as what the CDC’s provided to say that vaccines, plural, do not cause autism,” Bigtree told The Epoch Times. “This is a false statement.”

    “We will bring a case against the CDC to remove that from the website because it is actually inaccurate,” he added.

    Bigtree says that the CDC has not been able to provide his organization studies that concretely show vaccines given to infants in the first six months of life do not cause autism, a neurological and developmental disorder that may be diagnosed as early as six to 12 months.

    “If vaccines contribute to the issue, certainly we can isolate it inside of the vaccines given in the first six months of life because autism is appearing at six months,” Bigtree said.

    The United States has seen an increase in children diagnosed with autism. In 2000, there were only 1 in 150 children with autism. By 2016, the CDC estimated that 1 in 45 children had autism, with 1 in 32 children diagnosed in New Jersey.A spokesperson from the CDC said the health agency has always been upfront about its position on vaccines and autism. “CDC is and has always been clear on this subject: vaccines do not cause autism,” the spokesperson told The Epoch Times in an email.

    In August 2020, the federal agency said it was doing an update to its website and temporarily took down the statement causing a misunderstanding that the CDC may have changed its stance on the issue.

    “As for the statement you reference, in the fall of 2020, as part of routine website updates to ensure consistent website formatting, CDC updated its page on vaccines and autism,” the spokesperson said. “Recently, this change has been misinterpreted on social media and among some organizations as a change in CDC’s position.”

    “The headline has been added back to our website to ensure there is no confusion around CDC’s position,” she added.

    According to Bigtree, the statement was taken down from the CDC website on Aug. 27, 2020, and added back again shortly after ICAN issued a press release about the change on Jan. 25.

    Mark Sadaka, a vaccine injury lawyer who has handled over 180 vaccination cases, said the CDC “will never” remove the statement since the health agency is making that claim based on its own research and the recommendation of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) that “meet regularly and vote on all kinds of issues, including safety concerns and recommendations on who should get vaccinated and when.”

    “The CDC is the U.S. premier public health agency, and like what the ACIP did, it can take currently available information and issue statements related to public health,” Sadaka told The Epoch Times in an email. “That is what the CDC is charged to do and that is what they did here.”

    Sadaka said that ICAN’s lawsuit should instead focus on having the CDC “add qualifying language to the information presented to the public.”

    “The best that could happen [for ICAN’s lawsuit] is the addition of qualifying language that says ‘six effects of vaccines within the first six weeks of life have not been studied’ or something like that,” Sadaka said.

    “As a lawyer for people injured by vaccines, I can say that vaccines can hurt and kill. But when it comes to autism specifically, the science is just not there right now. It may come one day,” he added.

    Lack of Studies to Support ClaimIn 2019, ICAN and the Institute for Autism Science submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the CDC requesting the health agency provide all of the studies it relied upon to determine that the five vaccines given during the first six months of an infant’s life do not cause autism.

    The vaccines: diphtheria, tetanus, and acellular pertussis (DTaP), hepatitis B, polio (IPV), Haemophilus Influenzae type B (Hib), and pneumococcal conjugate (PCV13), are each “injected into the babies three times during the first six months of life,” the complaint [pdf] filed against the CDC in December 2019 reads.

    The CDC eventually provided ICAN with 20 studies in March 2020 [pdf] after it was forced to submit to the FOIA request.

    Of the 20 trials provided by the CDC, 18 did not address any of the five vaccines that ICAN challenged.

    Instead, they were related to either the MMR (measles, mumps, and rubella), thimerosal, or both. Thimerosal is a mercury-containing preservative widely used to prevent bacterial and fungal growth in vaccines until 2001, when it was “removed from or reduced in all vaccines for children 6 years of age” except for the flu shot, according to the CDC.

    Bigtree said two of the remaining studies—the 2012 report by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) and the 2013 antigen exposure trial, both funded by the CDC—still did not answer whether vaccines given from birth until six months cause autism.

    The antigen study [pdf] published in the Journal of Pediatrics looked specifically at the number of antigens—a substance that can induce an immune response—in vaccines given in the first two years of life in children with autism spectrum disorder and those without. It did not examine the effects of other substances in the vaccines such as adjuvants and other chemicals.

    The CDC says adjuvants are ingredients in vaccines that “help create a stronger immune response” or helps “vaccines work better” but “can cause more local reactions (such as redness, swelling, and pain at the injection site) and more systemic reactions (such as fever, chills and body aches) than non-adjuvanted vaccines.” A common adjuvant used in many vaccines is aluminum.

    The authors of the study found no evidence to indicate an association between exposure to antigens in the vaccines and autism, or in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) with regression, although, “It can be argued that ASD with regression, in which children usually lose developmental skills during the second year of life, could be related to exposures in infancy, including vaccines.”

    The IOM report was the only study to address one of the vaccines, the DTaP that ICAN inquired about. The study analyzed over 12,000 peer-reviewed trials to examine whether certain vaccines caused the 158 recognized adverse effects.

    Based on the available scientific literature, the IOM found only five of the 158 adverse events were not associated with vaccinations, 18 were associated with vaccines, and for the remaining 135 adverse effects, there was inadequate evidence to “accept or reject a causal relationship.”

    For the DTaP vaccine, the report concluded that “the evidence is inadequate to accept or reject a causal relationship between diphtheria toxoid-, tetanus toxoid-, or acellular pertussis-containing vaccine and autism.”

    The only relevant study reviewed by the IOM but “was not considered in the weight of epidemiologic evidence” found an association between autism and DTaP. The study was rejected because “it provided data from a passive surveillance system and lacked an unvaccinated population.”

    To date, no study has been conducted on overall health effects between a vaccinated and a placebo or an unvaccinated group because of ethical concerns about withholding vaccines from children in the placebo group.

    But Bigtree says the CDC can still do a retrospective and comparative study on vaccinated vs unvaccinated children using data from its Vaccine Safety Datalink that monitors “safety of vaccines and conduct studies about rare and serious adverse events following immunization.”

    Bigtree alleges that the federal health agencies refuse to do this type of study, saying it was confirmed in a meeting he and Robert Kennedy Jr. had with officials from the National Institute of Health (NIH), including Director of the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Disease Anthony Fauci, to discuss vaccine safety on May 30, 2017. The meeting was set up by President Donald Trump.

    “That’s all we asked for, just do a comparative study with your database, vaccinated versus unvaccinated,” Bigtree said. “And they essentially said to us, ‘We will never do that study.’”

    The NIH did not respond to an email from The Epoch Times for comment.

    “That study could answer this question once and for all,” Bigtree said. “Which means, if they knew they were right and they knew that vaccines made people healthier, they would do that study.”

    The IOM has also suggested that a study be done between “those who receive no vaccinations and those who receive the full currently recommended immunization schedule” to address “all health outcomes and safety concerns” in its 2013 report on vaccine schedule safety.

    The CDC’s recommended vaccine schedule includes 50-54 doses of 13 vaccines when the flu shot is given annually beginning at one year of age and if the combination vaccines (DTaP and MMR) are not counted separately.

    The United States recommends the most vaccines to children and adolescents compared to other Western countries. In Sweden, vaccinations are voluntary, and the first dose is offered at six weeks instead of immediately after birth like in the United States. Sweden offers 22 doses of seven vaccines."
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  35. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    avid (23rd February 2021), Bill Ryan (25th March 2022), Constance (23rd February 2021)

  36. Link to Post #500
    United States Avalon Member onawah's Avatar
    Join Date
    28th March 2010
    Language
    English
    Posts
    22,261
    Thanks
    47,750
    Thanked 116,541 times in 20,693 posts

    Default Re: Do vaccines contribute to autism? Should we vaccinate?

    Urgent call to action! We have 26 days to convince the FDA to reject the Pfizer mRNA shot in kids under 5.
    Autism Action Network <jgilmore@autismactionnetwork.org>
    3/18/22



    TAKE ACTION--it's easy!: https://www.votervoice.net/Broadcast...s2oghQ-YM-S4LQ

    "Autism Action Network is joining Toby Rogers, Ph.D. in his call to stop the FDA from issuing an Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer mRNA shot for kids under 5. Rogers offers some of the most incisive analysis of Covid, autism, the medical products and services industry, and politics in his column uTobian on Substack which you can read and subscribe to here: https://tobyrogers.substack.com/

    On February 10, we achieved a remarkable victory — Pfizer was forced to withdraw its Emergency Use Authorization application to inject kids 6 months to four years old because the data was so terrible. But it was a temporary reprieve. Even though Pfizer’s clinical trials of the genetically modified mRNA shot have already failed twice in this age group, Pfizer is planning to submit another application for Emergency Use Authorization in early April — just under 30 days from now.

    This is one of the last battles in this phase of the war. There are 18 million children under five who are potentially impacted by this decision. But Pfizer’s real goal is to achieve permanent liability protection. Currently, Pfizer shots are authorized for emergency use and given liability protection under the PREP Act. But emergency use authorization expires, usually after a year, so Pfizer must apply for full approval — which is not difficult because they control the FDA. Once the shot has full approval, Pfizer loses the liability protection offered by the PREP Act and is potentially exposed to billions of dollars of injury claims for their faulty product. However, if Pfizer can get the mRNA shot added to the childhood vaccine schedule, then it will enjoy permanent liability protection under the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act. So that’s what this fight is all about.

    We absolutely must find a way to defeat the upcoming Pfizer EUA application in kids 6 months to 4 years old.

    So here’s the plan. A group of allies will put out a call to action once a week from now until the FDA meets to consider this application. Each week we are going to focus on a different pillar of the corrupt system. We need you to dedicate one hour a week to sending out 25 emails, making 25 calls, send 25 letters, or sending 25 faxes. It seems like a big ask until you realize that the alternative is to live under Pharma tyranny for the rest of our lives. The momentum is on our side, the data is on our side, every day more politicians come over to our side, we are the majority, this is our moment, we must embrace our responsibility to stop this insanity.

    Many of you have participated in my calls to action before. What’s new or different about this call to action? I’ve got much better talking points. There is a new FDA Commissioner, Robert Califf, who we need to educate about these matters. We are reaching deeper inside the bureaucracy to educate some of the staffers who write the reports that are part of the evaluation process. And there are several new members of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee who need to hear from us as well.

    Please click here:
    https://www.votervoice.net/Broadcast...s2oghQ-YM-S4LQ
    ...to send email messages to the key decision makers below calling for the denial of an emergency use authorization for the Covid MRNA injection for children under 5.

    If you value the information and advocacy brought to you by the Autism Action Network please support us by donating here: https://grouprev.com/AutismActionNetwork2021

    Please share the following link to this message: https://www.votervoice.net/AUTISMACT.../93159/respond

    Talking Points

    Feel free to compose your own message or share your story with the federal officials listed below.

    Subject line: please REJECT the Pfizer EUA application to inject mRNA into kids 6 months to 4 years old when it returns in April

    1. There is no Covid emergency for children under five years old.

    Children have a 99.995% recovery rate and a body of medical literature indicates that almost zero healthy children under five years old have died from Covid.

    • A large study conducted in Germany showed zero deaths for children under 5 and a case fatality rate of three out of a million in children without comorbidities.

    •A Johns Hopkins study monitoring 48,000 children diagnosed with Covid showed a zero mortality rate in children under 18 without comorbidities.

    •A study in Nature demonstrated that children under 18 with no comorbidities have virtually no risk of death.

    2. The Pfizer mRNA shot does not work very well in kids.

    The Pfizer clinical trial in kids 6 months to four years old failed in December 2021 and failed again in February 2022. Adding a third dose is not going to solve the underlying problems with this vaccine in this age group.

    The FDA and CDC claimed that the Pfizer shot was 90% effective in kids 5 to 11. Recently released data show that it was only 12% effective against the Omicron variant. So all of the FDA and CDC risk benefit calculations were wrong.

    By contrast, there are more than 1,500 studies in connection with about twenty off-the-shelf medicines that are safe and effective. Prophylaxis and early treatment with these medicines offer a better alternative than risky mRNA shots.

    3. The harms from the Pfizer mRNA shot in children are catastrophic.

    There are now 4,376 VAERS reports of adverse events in children following Covid shots. These reports likely understate harms by a factor of 41 to 100.

    There are troubling reports of fatalities in children following Covid shots:
    https://openvaers.com/covid-data/child-reports/1975356
    https://openvaers.com/covid-data/child-reports/2109625
    https://openvaers.com/covid-data/child-reports/2152560
    https://www.icandecide.org/ican_pres...rds-as-to-why/

    Everyone knows that FDA approval = CDC adding it to the childhood schedule = liability protection forever = mandates = widespread iatrogenic injury.

    You have a professional and moral obligation to reject Pfizer’s EUA application for kids 6 months to 4 years old.

    People to contact:

    Please reach out and find a way to awaken the moral core of these 24 people in key policy making positions. Please be respectful and courteous. The fate of our nation is at stake.

    Rochelle Walensky
    Director, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    Roybal Building 21, Rm 12000
    1600 Clifton Rd
    Atlanta, GA 30333
    phone: (404) 639-7000
    Aux7@cdc.gov
    https://twitter.com/CDCDirector

    Xavier Becerra
    Secretary, Health & Human Services
    200 Independence Avenue S.W.
    Washington, D.C. 20201
    c/o Sean McCluskie
    sean.mccluskie@hhs.gov
    https://twitter.com/XavierBecerra

    Robert Califf
    FDA Commissioner
    FDA Mail stop: HF-1
    Parklawn Building
    12420 Parklawn Drive
    Rockville, Maryland, 20852
    phone: (301) 796-5400
    fax: (301) 847-8752
    commissioner@fda.hhs.gov
    https://twitter.com/DrCaliff_FDA

    Peter Marks
    Director, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
    FDA, Mail stop: HFM-2
    10903 New Hampshire Ave., WO71-7232
    Silver Spring MD 20993-0002
    phone: (240) 402-8116
    fax: (301) 595-1310
    Peter.Marks@fda.hhs.gov

    Hong Yang
    Biologist, FDA/CBER/OBE
    Building WO71, Room 5338
    Mail stop: HFM-210
    Silver Spring MD 20993-0002
    phone: (240) 402-8836
    fax: (301) 595-1240
    Hong.Yang@fda.hhs.gov

    Richard Forshee
    Associate Director, FDA/CBER/OBE
    Building, WO71, Room 5342
    Silver Spring MD 20993-0002
    phone: (240) 402-8631
    fax: (301) 595-1240
    Richard.Forshee@fda.hhs.gov

    Hui-Lee Wong
    Associate Director for Innovation and Development,
    Office of Biostatistics and Epidemiology,
    Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
    White Oak Building 71, Room 5222
    Silver Spring MD 20993-0002
    phone: (240) 402-0473
    Huilee.Wong@fda.hhs.gov

    Leslie Ball
    Office of Vaccines Research and Review
    Division of Vaccines and Related Products Applications,
    Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research
    Building WO22, Room 6156
    Silver Spring MD 20993-0002
    phone: (301) 796-3399
    Leslie.Ball@fda.hhs.gov

    Doran L. Fink
    Deputy Director – Clinical,
    Division of Vaccines and Related Products Applications
    Office of Vaccines Research and Review, CBER
    Mail stop HFM-475
    Building WO71, Room 3314
    Silver Spring MD 20993-0002
    phone: (301) 796-1159
    Doran.Fink@fda.hhs.gov

    VRBPAC Members:

    Hana El Sahly, M.D., Chair VRBPAC
    Associate Professor
    Department of Molecular Virology and Microbiology
    Department of Medicine
    Section of Infectious Diseases
    Baylor College of Medicine
    Houston, TX 77030
    713-798-2058
    hanae@bcm.edu

    Paula Annunziato, M.D.
    Vice President and Therapeutic Area Head
    Vaccines Clinical Research
    Merck
    North Wales, PA 19454
    paula.annunziato@merck.com

    Adam C. Berger, Ph.D.
    Director, Division of Clinical and Healthcare Research Policy
    Office of Science Policy
    Office of the Director
    National Institutes of Health
    6705 Rockledge Drive, Suite 630
    Bethesda, MD 20892
    (301) 827-9676
    adam.berger@nih.gov

    Henry H. Bernstein, D.O.
    Professor of Pediatrics
    Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell
    Department of Pediatrics
    Cohen Children’s Medical Center
    New Hyde Park, NY 11042
    phone: (516) 838-6415 (office)
    fax: (516) 465-5399
    hbernstein@northwell.edu

    Captain Amanda Cohn
    Chief Medical Officer
    National Center for Immunizations and Respiratory Diseases
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
    1600 Clifton Rd
    Atlanta, GA 30333 MS C-09
    phone: (404) 639-6039
    fax: (404) 315-4679
    acohn@cdc.gov

    Holly Janes, Ph.D.
    Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
    Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division
    1100 Fairview Avenue North,
    M2-C200
    P.O. Box 19024
    Seattle, Washington 98109 U.S.A.
    phone: (206) 667.6353
    hjanes@fredhutch.org

    Hayley Gans, M.D.
    Professor of Pediatrics
    Department of Pediatrics
    Stanford University Medical Center
    Stanford, CA 94305
    phone: (650) 723-5682
    fax: (650) 725-8040
    hgans@stanford.edu

    David Kim, M.D.
    CAPT, U.S. Public Health Services
    Office of Infectious Disease and HIV/AIDS Policy
    Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
    330 C Street SW, Suite L600
    Washington, DC 20024
    phone: (202) 795-7636
    david.kim@hhs.gov

    Arnold Monto, M.D.
    Professor Emeritus
    Department of Epidemiology
    University of Michigan School of Public Health
    Ann Arbor, MI 48109
    phone: (734) 764-5453
    fax: (734) 764-3192
    asmonto@umich.edu

    Paul Offit, M.D.
    Professor of Pediatrics
    Division of Infectious Diseases
    Abramson Research Building
    The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia
    Philadelphia, PA 19104
    phone: (215) 590-2020
    offit@chop.edu
    https://twitter.com/DrPaulOffit

    Steven Pergam, M.D.
    Medical Director
    Infection Prevention
    Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
    Seattle, WA 98109
    phone: (206) 667-7126
    spergam@fredhutch.org
    https://twitter.com/PergamIC

    Jay Portnoy, M.D.
    Director, Division of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology
    Children’s Mercy Hospitals & Clinics
    2401 Gillham Road
    Kansas City, MO 64108
    phone: (816) 960-8885
    fax: (816) 960-8888
    Jportnoy@cmh.edu

    Eric Rubin, M.D., Ph.D.
    Editor-in-Chief
    New England Journal of Medicine
    Adjunct Professor
    Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health
    665 Huntington Ave
    Building 1, Room 811
    Boston, MA 02115
    phone: (617) 432-3335
    erubin@hsph.harvard.edu
    erubin@nejm.org

    Andrea Shane, M.D.
    Professor of Pediatrics
    Emory University School of Medicine
    2015 Uppergate Drive NE, Rm. 504A
    Atlanta, GA 30322
    phone: (404) 727-9880 (direct)
    (404) 727-5642 (main)
    fax: (404) 727-8249
    ashane@emory.edu

    Geeta K. Swamy, M.D.
    Senior Associate Dean
    Vice Chair for Research & Faculty Development
    Associate Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology
    Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine
    Duke University
    Box 3967 Med Ctr,
    Durham, NC 27710
    phone: (919) 681-5220
    swamy002@mc.duke.edu

    Please share this message with friends and family and please post on social networks while we still can.

    Click the link below to log in and send your message:
    https://www.votervoice.net/Broadcast...s2oghQ-YM-S4LQ
    Each breath a gift...
    _____________

  37. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to onawah For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (25th March 2022), ClearWater (19th March 2022), DNA (30th January 2023), Ewan (19th March 2022), Franny (19th March 2022), Gwin Ru (19th March 2022), Reinhard (19th March 2022), Stephanie (9th December 2022)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 25 of 27 FirstFirst 1 15 25 27 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts