Internet Censorship: So it continues...

[ExomatrixTV]

• source

[ExomatrixTV]

• Facebook Censoring Real People Accused Of Being Bots:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=8Aysgx-pSVM

[ExomatrixTV]

1000s of people said: "Fck.U. Trump" multiple times and being promoted as "100% okay" during Trump Presidency ... Now they are "outraged" when a Pilot says: "Let's Go Brandon" which is a "code phrase" for "Fck.U. Biden" ... This "outrage" of those hypocrites is obvious utterly pathetic.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=XkL-KzaYxuw

[ExomatrixTV]

• FBI and Southern District of New York Raid Project Veritas Journalists’ Homes

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=nNpbvsS7K0g

[onawah]

...Except the jabs HAVE been linked to AIDs. See the Stew Peters show.

Posted by meat suit (here)
Brazilian senators ask high court to BAN President Bolsonaro from social media after bogus claims Covid shots are linked to AIDS

https://www.rt.com/news/538513-brazi...media-vaccine/

Senators in Brazil have filed a request with the country’s Supreme Court, asking justices to issue an order suspending President Jair Bolsonaro from social media after he claimed Covid-19 jabs were linked to AIDS.

On Tuesday, the Covid Parliamentary Inquiry Commission (CPI) approved a request from opposition parliamentarians to sanction the president’s use of social media after Bolsonaro claimed in a video shared on Facebook and YouTube that Britons who had been given two Covid-19 shots were developing Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (AIDS) faster than expected.

The request to raise the matter to the high court was approved by the CPI on Tuesday morning. The CPI, which was charged with investigating the Brazilian government’s handling of the Covid-19 pandemic, has accused Bolsonaro of “crimes against humanity” as well as eight other crimes.

According to local media, the Socialism and Liberty Party (PSOL) raised the criminal complaint against the president for “violations of the Penal Code, infraction of a preventive sanitary measure and danger to the life or health of third parties.”

[ThePythonicCow]

.
Vernon Coleman has been heavily censored since he started speaking out about the covid fraud, in early 2020.

He had been publishing books and videos for years, criticizing conventional medicine. I listen to almost every video he posts on BrandNewTube - he's great.

But as soon as he started exposing covid, he was attacked, removed and discredited by all means available to the establishment.

Now it's just gotten worse - with an Interview that not even BrandNewTube will play.

He has been able to post videos on BrandNewTube, until a few days ago, when his latest BrandNewTube, audio only interview with Steve Pollard does not to play there either. The webpage for this interview on BrandNewTube is still there, but the mp4 video files that Vernon supposedly uploaded with this interview have been removed from BrandNewTube.

The non-working post of this interview on BrandNewTube:

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/audio...V77pRnQ9C.html

The still playable interview on Vernon's own website:

Explosive Interview

Vernon is pissed, not just at the censorship, at the lies and the mass harm and murder.

[ExomatrixTV]

• How ‘fact-checking’ can be used as censorship

What can be a powerful tool in the fight against online falsehoods is often abused
Jemima Kelly


When Donald Trump said last May he was “confident” that a vaccine would be ready by the end of 2020, the US president was upbraided by NBC with what has become in recent years a popular journalistic and political device: the “fact check”. “Experts say he needs a ‘miracle’ to be right,” the broadcaster declared. Facebook used the same device last week on a piece from UnHerd that criticised the World Health Organization’s Covid-19 investigation for dismissing the possibility the virus leaked from a Wuhan laboratory as “extremely unlikely”. The social media platform labelled the article with a “false information” tag, though the virus’s origins have not been established. Facebook alleged the article contained “information . . . that independent fact-checkers say is false”. After UnHerd objected, Facebook apologised; three days later the White House expressed “deep concerns” about the WHO probe. I find these examples troubling. In both cases it wasn’t facts that were being checked. Perhaps Trump had no evidence to justify his confidence. But to “fact-check” his views feels to me like the politicisation of a device meant to support objectivity. Fact-checking can be a powerful tool in the fight against online falsehood. But it can be used as a means of censorship if not only facts but also opinions and narratives are checked. Facebook’s intervention is particularly concerning, especially in light of the company’s decision to block postings from legitimate news organisations in Australia. It did not remove UnHerd’s article entirely but its algorithms are programmed so that anything with a “false information” tag appears lower on users’ newsfeeds. Facebook has partnerships with independent fact-checkers such as Full Fact and PolitiFact, which are part of the International Fact-Checking Network and abide by a common set of principles. But in the UnHerd case, the decision was made by the company’s internal fact-checking team, which provides little transparency about how it operates. “When an internet company comes in and makes its own content moderation decisions, under the label of fact-checking, that's not fact-checking,” says Will Moy, chief executive of Full Fact. What gets called fact-checking too often feels like political point-scoring, but with the veneer of impartiality. In the run-up to last year’s US election, a number of outlets ran fact-checks on a video of Joe Biden seeming to get confused about Trump’s name and referring to someone called George. “No, Biden did not confuse George W Bush and Donald Trump,” the Washington Post wrote, arguing that he must have been talking directly to the interviewer George Lopez. The paper gave the claim that Biden had been confused “four Pinocchios” — its rating for the most mendacious claims. I’ve watched the video and find it implausible that Biden was addressing Lopez, but neither I nor the Post can be sure either way. I think “fact-checking” such a claim makes a mockery of the whole concept. And scoring systems like the number of “Pinocchios” or PolitiFact’s “Truth-O-Meter” make it even harder to reach nuanced conclusions. Stephen Ceci, a Cornell psychology professor, suggests one solution might be to institute “adversarial fact-checking”: have fact-checkers from different ends of the political spectrum examine a claim and present the competing evidence to the public. This seems sensible to me: where ambiguity exists, it should be communicated. Still, I wouldn’t want to live in a postmodernist world in which no objective reality is acknowledged — facts matter and are needed for a functional democracy. Fact-checking helps, but over-reach must be avoided. Last week, a Poynter Institute newsletter complained that the social media app Clubhouse, which allows users to listen to and take part in audio discussions, “produces barriers for fact-checkers” because it doesn’t keep its audio files or allow recordings. Used correctly, fact-checking contests falsehoods in ways that complement free speech. But free speech is about letting people be wrong as well as right. We must limit the checking to facts, which is tricky enough, and not opinions that the checkers don’t happen to like.

• source

[Richter]

European Parliament’s Plans Of A Digital Services Act Threaten Internet Freedoms
November 11, 2021
By Christoph Schmon

The EU’s Digital Services Act is a chance to preserve what works and to fix what is broken. EFF and other civil society groups have advocated for new rules that protect fundamental rights online, while formulating a bold vision to address today’s most pressing challenges. However, while the initial proposal by the EU Commission got several things right, the EU Parliament is toying with the idea of introducing a new filternet, made in Europe. Some politicians believe that any active platform should potentially be held liable for the communications of its users and they trust that algorithmic filters can do the trick to swiftly remove illegal content.

In an opinion piece published on “heise online” on 8 November 2021 under a CC BY 4.0 license, Julia Reda, head of the control © project at the civil rights NGO Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte (GFF) and former Member of the EU Parliament has analyzed the current proposals and explained what is at stake for internet users. We have translated this text below.
Edit Policy: Digital Services Act derailed in the European Parliament

It’s a familiar pattern in net politics – the EU Commission makes a proposal that threatens fundamental digital rights. Civil society then mobilizes for protests and relies on the directly elected European Parliament to prevent the worst. However, in the case of the EU’s most important legislative project for regulating online platforms – the Digital Services Act – the most dangerous proposals are now coming from the European Parliament itself, after the draft law of the EU Commission had turned out to be surprisingly friendly to fundamental rights.

Apparently, the European Parliament has learned nothing from the debacle surrounding Article 17 of the Copyright Directive. It threatens a dystopian set of rules that promotes the widespread use of error-prone upload filters, allows the entertainment industry to block content at the push of a button, and encourages disinformation by tabloid media on social media.

CONTINUE: https://www.activistpost.com/2021/11...-freedoms.html

[ExomatrixTV]

• The Real Reason YouTube Is Hiding Dislikes:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=f1Izh3-c88Y

[ExomatrixTV]

• Kim Iversen: Secret Big Tech Contracts With NSA, DOD Should SCARE You:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=y1izdS2-ds8

Kim Iversen explains why a collaboration between the U.S. government and big tech is concerning.

[ExomatrixTV]

• Project Veritas, Assange, and the Authoritarian Decree of Who Is a "Real Journalist":

• source

[ExomatrixTV]

• 'This Is Now Becoming A Pattern': Jordan Slams YouTube Covid-19 'Censorship':

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=frn3WT15Dy8

[ExomatrixTV]

• ICYMI: Jordan Criticizes YouTube For 'Censorship' Of Removed Video About Children And Masks:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=P_MYE2jkIWk

[Matthew]

Censorship in real-time

ЯΞD PILL LΞD Right-pointing magnifying glass
@Red_Pill_Led
German police barge into the house of anti-lockdown activist Dr Andreas Noack, arrest him during YouTube livestream: Watch video
<video shows guy presenting a video livestream then German armed police come in and arrest him>

[lake]

Posted by Matthew (here)
Censorship in real-time

Just to confirm .... that is from around the 19th Nov 2020, so over a year ago .... and he is now dead a few days. (after his last video release)
I downloaded that full video and the video he made before it .... but both are in German and I do not speak such.

[mountain_jim]

ThreeSevens
@threesevens


A liberal tells author Larry Correia that they aren't his enemy and that he paints them in too broad a brush, and Larry responds with an epic rant. https://monsterhunternation.com/2021...a-broad-brush/

Sample...

[ExomatrixTV]

• FREE FALL! It's ALL Coming Apart Now…

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=VNlpzOWc0s4

[ExomatrixTV]

• Free Speech - The Time to Stand Up is Now!

• source

[ExomatrixTV]

• James O'Keefe Responds to New Twitter Policy:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NAuHL5CIqWw

[onawah]

U.N. Taking Down Private Websites - Domain Level Censorship
78,790 views Premiered Dec 2, 2021
9K
Ice Age Farmer
278K subscribers

"The U.N. Counter Terrorism Executive Directorate (CTED) is now responsible for taking entire privately hosted websites offline, as they seek to take total control of the flow of information and establish their "Great Narrative." CTED notifies domain registrars of "extremist" sites -- i.e., those that promote narratives they don't approve of -- and the sites can no longer be found. This reflects a new level of internet censorship, but it is not just publishers who are in the crosshairs...it is all of us. Christian breaks it down in this Ice Age Farmer broadcast."

FULL SHOW NOTES:https://www.iceagefarmer.com/2021/12...el-censorship/

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=qFFEI60SThU