Internet Censorship: So it continues...

[ExomatrixTV]

• In 9 days FREE SPEECH could change FOREVER:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=n59C_m1Kv8o

This might be the biggest threat to free speech in our lifetime! An appeals court decided that the Biden administration still cannot censor speech on social media but they gave the government 9 days to appeal to the Supreme Court. The case revolves around the lawsuit brought by Missouri and Louisiana’s Attorneys General. In July, a judge ruled that they had proven that the Biden administration had violated First Amendment rights by working directly with social media to censor speech about Covid and other topics. He ruled that they cannot do it any more. The government appealed and the court agreed that the government had “ran afoul of the First Amendment” and still cannot do it. So what do you think? Should the Supreme Court take up this case?

[shaberon]

Posted by onawah (here)
According to a citizen journalist, X (formerly Twitter) and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) are working together to censor people on the platform.
The ADL has also been influencing crowdfunding platforms like GoFundMe to deplatform certain users
The ADL is using artificial intelligence software to comb through podcasts and video-game streams for “extremist” keywords.
This suggests ADL is surveilling the online activities of private citizens even if those activities have nothing to do with the ADL’s political and social causes

It may be worth taking a moment to chew on this and spit it out really hard.

To go back through censorship it must have gained an upper hand via the Holocaust or Shoah Business.

That is the ADL exactly. In its patchy existence one can find:


Louis Mortimer Bloomfield, co-founder of Permindex.



You don't want to do that, but, you look, and there really is such a thing.

But who cares? Well, we will take our censorship and step into a time capsule where this Permindex is alleged as the organization that assassinated President Kennedy.

Rolling right along, they were alleged to have plots to kill Reagan, the Pope, and no less than Lyndon Larouche himself. So we find he does what he can to expose it in EIR 1981:




Most obvious is the danger of a new war in the
Middle East, triggered by collaboration between the
"Islamic Fundamentalists" and the present, fascist government of Begin, Sharon and Shamir in Israel.

Becoming obvious is an effort to launch waves of
internal destabilizations of the Soviet Union itself. The
targets include the Ukraine, parts of the Caucasus, and
the Islamic populations in Soviet Asia.

Meanwhile, British and other circles are attempting
to use the Polish debt-crisis as the detonator of a general
financial panic in the world...


Then he describes a four-level plot:


On the first level, the plot involves a news-media and
related defamation campaign against LaRouche. This
has already begun, including a recent headlined libel in
the British intelligence-controlled New York Post of
December 1, 1981. This is being coordinated by Irwin
Suall of the drug-lobby organization known as the
Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and by a former FBI
operative self-alleged to be on the payroll of organized
crime figure Max Fisher, Milton Ellerin of New York
City.

The second level, is the attempt to organize a
diversionary riot in the vicinity of the location at which
a December 30-January 3 New York City conference of
the ICLC is scheduled to occur. This effort, being
coordinated through ADL-directed operative Dennis
King, is currently seeking to rally about 1,000 demonstrators from pro-marijuana and leftist groups as a
cover for "kamikaze" assaults by smaller groups on the
conference itself.

The U.S.A. and Israeli-linked forces which are being used in visible,
known efforts are essentially "expendables," deployed
in a manner to screen British agencies from visible
responsibility of authorship.


The higher levels are kill shots.

That is from a PDF before a quite long article on Permindex and Mr. Bloomfield. Without really quoting it, yes, it is probably worth a few minutes of poring over.

So yes, of course, they are trying to tell you how to talk.

[onawah]

NEWS Host Faces Jail For Reporting the NEWS
GREG REESE
SEP 12, 2023
https://gregreese.substack.com/p/new...t&r=p7227#play
(Podcast at the link)

"The criminals who have highjacked our government are letting us know that America is over and we are now their slaves

Elections have been rigged for centuries because government is a form of slavery. Which is why what the founding fathers of these United States gave us is so revered. They drafted a form of government unlike any other in history. A revolutionary form of governance based upon the foundation that all men are created equal and independent, and that all are born with the inherent and inalienable right to the preservation of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

George Washington wrote:

“If men are to be precluded from offering their sentiments on a matter, which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences that can invite the consideration of mankind, reason is of no use to us; the freedom of speech may be taken away, and dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the slaughter.”

Benjamin Franklin wrote:

“Freedom of speech is a principal pillar of a free government: When this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved, and tyranny is erected on its ruins”

And this is where we are at today. Our first amendment states that:

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”

And it has been stripped away from us by tyrants.

NEWS host, Owen Shroyer, is being charged with the crime of questioning the results of the 2020 presidential elections, the most blatant election fraud in US history. And he did so peacefully which is his god-given right under the US Constitution. But America has already been defeated. And while many haven’t noticed, others don’t seem to care.

Shroyer isn’t being charged with conspiracy, incitement, or any actual crime at all. He is being charged for exercising his freedom of speech. The sentencing document goes on for pages quoting him for saying what Americans on both sides of the crippling two-party system have been saying for over a century. In short, that the government is tyrannical and criminal. Which should be obvious to just about everyone at this point. And this is not a crime. It is the first line of defense against tyranny, our freedom to call it out.

The document mentions a simple misdemeanor that involves Shroyer being on capitol grounds. This was a violation of a court order that resulted from a 2019 arrest when Shroyer stood and protested a House Judiciary Committee meeting. But this is not the crime he is being charged with.

The 30-page sentencing document is nothing but hot air being blown by a legal team held on the leash by tyrants who occupy the halls of our government. What Shroyer is actually being charged with is best summarized on page 20 where it states:

“his statements and actions after January 6 illustrate his complete lack of remorse. To date, despite a number of opportunities he has taken to speak about the election and January 6, he has yet to sincerely demonstrate genuine remorse for his conduct.”

In other words, he won’t shut up about the stolen 2020 election. This is his god-given right. But the criminals who have highjacked we the people’s government are letting the rest of us know that those days are over, and we are now their slaves to be experimented on, thrown in jail, and murdered."

[ExomatrixTV]

• Biden’s Covid Censorship Struck Down In Court: Dr. Jay Bhattacharya Interview

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=M1CjQjLYdsA

Professor of medicine at Stanford University and co-founder of, 'Illusion of Consensus,' Substack Dr. Jay Bhattacharya talks about the Missouri v. Biden case.

[gini]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=EYg0BOmT08M

- ------6 min--
756,579 views Sep 13, 2023
At today's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) railed against the Biden Administration for working with social media companies to censor posts it didn't like.

[onawah]

Court Win: Biden Used Lies to Illegally Deplatform Mercola
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
September 20, 2023
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1916459490

https://media.mercola.com/ImageServe...ercola-pdf.pdf

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
In May 2022, the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, Eric Schmitt and Jeff Landry, along with the New Civil Liberties Alliance and a few individual plaintiffs, filed a lawsuit against Biden, arguing the White House is engaged in illegal suppression of protected speech
Discovery documents show at least 67 federal employees across more than a dozen agencies have been engaged in illegal censorship activities
In early July 2023, Judge Terry Doughty granted the plaintiffs’ injunction, prohibiting federal agencies and Biden administration officials from working with social media companies to limit protected speech
September 8, 2023, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld part of the lower court’s injunction, banning the White House, surgeon general, CDC and FBI from influencing social media companies to remove “disinformation.”
This is a major win, but amendments to the injunction may leave loopholes
Most disturbingly, the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is excluded from the appellate court’s injunction.
CISA appears to have played a major role in the government’s censorship of Americans, so by excluding CISA, government censorship may continue via third party partners

Between the documentation obtained through a recent lawsuit against the White House and the Twitter files1 released by Elon Musk, we now know that every facet of the U.S. government, including its intelligence agencies, has been involved in illegal and unconstitutional censorship.

In May 2022, the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, Eric Schmitt and Jeff Landry, along with the New Civil Liberties Alliance and a few individual plaintiffs, filed a lawsuit against President Joe Biden (Missouri v. Biden2), arguing the White House is engaged in illegal suppression of protected speech.

Two months earlier, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. had also filed a class action lawsuit (Kennedy v. Biden et.al.3), but due to their similarities and overlap, Kennedy’s case has since been consolidated into Missouri v. Biden.4

Initially, the White House did not cooperate with discovery and fought to keep communications secret, claiming all White House communications as "privileged," but September 7, 2022, Judge Terry Doughty rejected the government’s claim and ordered the White House to hand over any and all relevant records.5

Government Has Been Weaponized Against the People
Discovery documents from a lawsuit against the White House6 show at least 677,8 federal employees across more than a dozen agencies have been engaged in illegal censorship activities, including officials from:

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency’s (CISA) Election Security and Resilience team

Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Office of Intelligence and Analysis

The FBI’s foreign influence taskforce

The Justice Department’s (DOJ) national security division

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence

White House staff

Health and Human Services (HHS)

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)

The Office of the Surgeon General

The Census Bureau

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

The State Department

The U.S. Treasury Department

The U.S. Election Assistance Commission

The evidence show that government agencies and Big Tech companies held monthly Unified Strategies Group (USG) meetings at which topics to be censored and suppressed were discussed.

Censored topics included stories involving COVID jab refusal, especially those involving military refusals and consequences thereof, criticism against COVID restrictions and their effects on mental health, posts talking about testing positive for COVID after getting the jab, personal stories of COVID jab side effects, including menstrual irregularities, and worries about vaccine passports becoming mandatory.9 On the private industry side, notable tech participants in the censorship meetings have included:

Google

Facebook

Twitter

YouTube

Reddit

Microsoft

Verizon Media

Pinterest

LinkedIn

Wikimedia Foundation

A Win for Our Constitutional Rights
But there’s good news for a change. In early July 2023, Judge Doughty granted the plaintiffs’ injunction, prohibiting federal agencies and Biden administration officials from working with social media companies to limit protected speech.

The defendants appealed, but September 8, 2023, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the lower court’s injunction banning the White House, surgeon general, CDC and FBI from influencing social media companies to remove so-called "disinformation."10

According to the judge’s decision,11 the White House and the surgeon general "coerced the platforms to make their moderation decisions by way of intimidating messages and threats of adverse consequences" and "significantly encouraged the platforms' decisions by commandeering their decision-making processes."

The appellate court also found that the FBI had illegally coerced social media companies to remove content. "Given the record before us, we cannot say that the FBI’s messages were plainly threatening in tone or manner," the judges wrote. But "we do find the FBI’s requests came with the backing of clear authority over the platforms."

As for the CDC, the judges opined that "CDC officials provided direct guidance to the platforms on the application of the platforms’ internal policies and moderation activities" by telling them what was, and was not, misinformation, asking for changes to platforms’ moderation policies and directing platforms to take specific actions.

"Ultimately, the CDC’s guidance informed, if not directly affected, the platforms’ moderation decisions," the judges said, so, "although not plainly coercive, the CDC officials likely significantly encouraged the platforms’ moderation decisions, meaning they violated the First Amendment."

Appellate Court Left Door Open for Government Censorship
Unfortunately, the appellate court also reversed, vacated and modified other parts of the original injunction,12 which leaves the door open for certain federal agencies to continue their censorship activities.

Importantly, the court excluded all federal officials and agencies from the original injunction with the exception of the White House, surgeon general’s office, the CDC and FBI.

Most disturbingly, officials from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) are excluded from the injunction,13 and as discussed in previous articles, CISA appears to have played a major, if not central, role in the government’s censorship of Americans.

CISA appears to have played a major role in the government’s censorship of Americans, so by excluding CISA, government censorship may continue via third party partners.
CISA is partnered with the Election Integrity Partnership (EIP), later renamed the Virality Project,14 and in an Atlantic Council interview, EIP head Alex Stamos openly admitted that the partnership was set up to outsource censorship that the government could not do due to "lack of legal authorization."15

They’ve been coordinating the take-down of undesirable content using a real-time chat app that the DHS, EIP and social media companies all share.

The reason for the court’s decision to vacate the injunction against CISA is that "although CISA flagged content for social media platforms as part of its switchboarding operations ... it’s conduct falls on the ‘attempts to convince,’ not ‘attempts to coerce,’ side of the line ... There is not sufficient evidence that CISA made threats of adverse consequences ... to the platforms for refusing to act on the content it flagged."

However, CDC officials were also found to have used noncoercive methods, and made no threats of adverse consequences, yet they are still part of the injunction and were expressly found to have violated the First Amendment.

The CDC was deemed to have "encouraged" platforms’ decision-making processes. So, what’s the difference between "encouraging" and "attempting to convince" platforms to censor? Isn’t "attempting to convince" closer to coercion than merely encouraging censorship?

Unfortunately, by excluding CISA, government censorship could potentially continue via third parties like the EIP/Virality project and other nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), provided they don’t use threats of punishment or get directly involved in platform moderation of content.

Injunction Is Still a Major Win
All of that said, the injunction against the White House, surgeon general, CDC and FBI is still a considerable win. As noted by attorney Jeff Childers (who is not part of the case):16

"It’s not an exaggeration to say this case is probably the most important civil rights case in our lifetimes. This ruling is terrific news. To give you some inside baseball about how good it was, I’ll explain some injunction law.

There are four main elements that a party must prove to get an injunction. Three of them are tough. One of the tough ones is that the party must show a ‘substantial likelihood of prevailing on the merits.’ In simpler words, that means the party seeking the injunction has to convince the court it will probably win the whole case.

So when a court grants an injunction, it must also find that, at this point, it looks like the party is probably going to win. It’s like an early trial, a preview of the court’s final decision, a trial-before-the-trial. The party that wins the injunction then has a huge, permanent advantage in the case.

So the fact that in Missouri v. Biden, the trial court and now the appellate court have both agreed on the injunction, things are looking very bad for the government and its censorship machine."

White House Relied on Foreign Disinfo to Censor Americans
In related news, House Judiciary chairman Jim Jordan is exposing how the federal government relied on foreign disinformation to censor Americans. As reported by Townhall17 September 5, 2023, Jordan’s "Facebook Files" reveal the White House and federal officials relied on false and fabricated information from the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH).

Jordan launched an investigation into the CCDH’s potential role in the Biden administration’s censorship regime August 3, 2023. The group was ordered to hand over records to the Judiciary Committee detailing its interactions with the U.S. government and the executive branch by August 17.18

CCDH refused to comply, so now the group has been subpoenaed, and must respond by September 29.19 Jordan is already starting to connect the dots, though. In a series of September 5 tweets, Jordan wrote:20

"The UK-based Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) claimed that Robert Kennedy Jr. & 11 others were responsible for 65% of anti-vaccine content circulating on social media. But CCDH’s absurd claim about the so-called ‘Disinformation Dozen’ was itself disinformation.

First, that 65% stat? CCDH was off by quite a bit. Facebook knew the actual number was closer to 0.05%. Second, despite attacking Robert Kennedy Jr. and the others as the co-called ‘Disinformation Dozen,’ a lot of their accounts were ‘completely benign’ according to Facebook.

As Facebook admitted internally, a lot of these accounts were just Americans expressing ‘vaccine hesitancy,’ which is often ‘not misinfo,’ even under Facebook’s policies.

But that didn’t stop the Biden White House from repeating the fake stat every chance they got. Jen Psaki repeated the CCDH’s disinformation almost verbatim ... The CCDH published its report on March 24, 2021.

By April 2021, Facebook employees were preparing a draft memo to Mark Zuckerberg about ‘pressure from ... the White House’ to remove the Disinfo Dozen even though they did ‘not believe we currently have a clear path for removal’ ...

Facebook was stunned that the Biden White House seemed to actually believe the CCDH’s obviously false stat and was relying on these foreign activists’ ‘data’ to ‘guide major governmental policy decisions.’

To be clear, the Biden White House didn’t just want Facebook to censor the Disinformation Dozen’s Facebook posts. They wanted EVERYTHING censored — across all social media platforms. Remember when Jen Psaki said this: ‘If you’re banned on one social media platform, you should be banned on the other social media platforms.’

Facebook understood what that meant. If Twitter or YouTube censored you, the Biden White House wanted Facebook to censor you too ... The Biden White House’s censorship demands didn’t stop there. They also wanted Facebook to remove all URL links to off-platform websites, which would ‘remove significant amounts of benign content posted by regular users, such as ... person experiences or government criticism’ ...

And that’s how the censorship regime works: Foreign activists at the CCDH feed false info to the Biden White House. The Biden admin then uses the full weight of the federal govt to coerce Facebook to censor Americans, Biden’s critics and political opponents, and the truth."

Support Legislation to Penalize Government Censorship
The Protecting Speech from Government Interference Act21 (HR. 8752), introduced by three Republican House Representatives on the House Oversight and Reform, Judiciary, and Commerce committees, including Jordan, is specifically aimed at preventing federal employees from using their positions to influence censorship decisions by tech platforms.

The bill would create restrictions to prevent federal employees from asking or encouraging private entities to censor private speech or otherwise discourage free speech, and impose penalties, including civil fines and disciplinary actions for government employees who facilitate social media censorship.

While the U.S. Constitution clearly forbids government censoring and restricting free speech, HR. 8752 could be a helpful enforcement tool — and we clearly need enforcement, so call your representatives and urge them to support this bill. People might tend to think twice, though, when they know there’s a personal price to pay."

Sources and References
1 MSN January 3, 2023
2, 6 State of Missouri and State of Louisiana Against President Joseph Biden, Civil Action No. 22-cv-1213
3 Kennedy v. Biden et al March 24, 2023
4 CHD July 25, 2023
5 Washington Times September 7, 2022
7 WAFB.com October 10, 2022
8 State of Missouri and State of Louisiana Against President Joseph Biden, Civil Action No. 22-cv-1213-TAD-KDM
9 Post Millennial September 1, 2022
10 Yahoo! News September 8, 2023
11, 12 US Court of Appeals for Fifth Circuit Case 23-30445 September 8, 2023
13 US Court of Appeals for Fifth Circuit Case 23-30445 September 8, 2023, page 72
14, 15 Foundation for Freedom Online November 9, 2022
16 Coffee & Covid 2023 September 9, 2023
17, 20 Townhall September 5, 2023
18 Greenmedinfo.com August 3, 2023
19 Townhall August 30, 2023
21 HR 8752 — Protecting Speech from Government Interference Act

[Matthew]

"real-time voice chat moderation at-scale"

The video game producer Activision are in partnership with A.I. company Modulate. The partnership aims to provide 'real-time voice chat moderation at-scale'. This is to stamp out toxic behaviour.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=FZVTcs4CHfk

[gini]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=nLfAVKgarLI

--Russell Brand’s CENSORSHIP Campaign Should Frighten You: Max Blumenthal

Sep 25, 2023 WASHINGTON
The Grayzone's Max Blumenthal discusses a recent conversation between him and Russell Brand. #RussellBrand #1A Originally aired September 20, 2023;

• Russell Brand’s CANCELATION By Big Te...

[ExomatrixTV]

• Harvard Is Ranked Last In Free Speech Rankings:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Z0arVcWofXk

[Miller]

George Galloway : Dr Epstein: Internet content is CONTROLLED by TWO Big Brothers | MOATS

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=CMTnkIOVix4

(19.14 minutes)
INTERVIEW: If they, and the other tech monopolies, aren’t stopped, the 2024 US election will be decided by Google, warns tech guru Dr Robert Epstein.

The two big tech monopolies are of course Google and Facebook who control all the content and decide what people around the world can see and cannot see. The power they have for shaping the narrative is inestimable and great cause for concern.

[Matthew]

Internet censorship... so it escalates.

New Law DESTROYS Youtube, Podcasts, Netflix & More & NOBODY Noticed Until It Was Too Late!
TheQuartering

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3T9CM4oo43w

[ExomatrixTV]

• Canada 🇨🇦 SILENCING Podcasts & Streamers? Censorship IS HERE:

Well, it's official: 2024 is GOING TO BE 1984 instead of a "progressive" future.

The Canadian government has officially announced new regulations on streaming and podcasting services to operate within their borders in an attempt to “ensure online streaming services make meaningful contributions to Canadian and Indigenous content”.

These new regulations are announced alongside the United Kingdom passing the "Online Safety Bill" awaiting approval by the King, and the United States debating the RESTRICT Act in Congress to provide sweeping jurisdiction over internet activities by unelected bureaucrats in Washington, D.C.

What are these governments so afraid of, exactly? ... Starts 7 min 21 sec in to the video.

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v3k51my/?pub=1hi16y

[Miller]

In 29 Days The Internet Will Change FOREVER

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=mwsrgNkg20A

(22:09 mins)
Russell Brand talking about the worldwide Online Safety Bill and suggests that we should resist, and for tips on how to do this, he recommends watching his interview with Robert Epstein, appended below.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Gqpati7CIDg

(44:17 mins)

[Miller]

Bumping the above video with Robert Epstein, who also said much the same thing when he was interviewed by Joe Rogan a year ago. This is an important video insofar as proof of what Google, and similar companies, are doing without anyone's knowledge. It's a bit like Edward Snowden, who confirmed what we all suspected all along . . .

For those with Spotify, The Joe Rogan podcast with Robert Epstein is is #1768

[ExomatrixTV]

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZliRGLVXrYI

Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” talks to Carl Benjamin (also known as Sargon of Akkad) about the escalating challenges to free expression online; his experience of being removed from Patreon; the government's involvement in pressuring tech companies to attack Russell Brand; how a global network of power with left-wing ideologies is attempting to control various aspects of society; if platforms like Rumble can succeed in preserving free expression on the internet; and much more.

[Matthew]

Posted by ExomatrixTV (here)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=ZliRGLVXrYI

Dave Rubin of “The Rubin Report” talks to Carl Benjamin (also known as Sargon of Akkad) about the escalating challenges to free expression online; his experience of being removed from Patreon; the government's involvement in pressuring tech companies to attack Russell Brand; how a global network of power with left-wing ideologies is attempting to control various aspects of society; if platforms like Rumble can succeed in preserving free expression on the internet; and much more.

Letters from MPs to cancel him but no charges. It doesn't make sense, except that it distracted from the online safety bill being passed. Brand called the bill out too late. He's always late to the party when you look at it. The end result is increased trust in Brand, which doesn't make sense. Except, sadly imho it does.

[ExomatrixTV]

I just saw many different Big YouTube Channels (most with over 100K subs, some over 1 million subs) that uploaded highlights of recent David Icke interviews with wonderful added illustrations that are EMBEDDED here on many different Project Avalon Forum Threads being taken down by ScrwTube because of "Violating Youtube Terms of Service".

• David must have said something right, I guess.

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

• Here at London Real we have consistently championed those who, like us, found themselves on the margins of the mainstream, in particular during 2020 and for much of the time since. We firmly believe in everybody’s right to Freedom of Speech. Not to antagonise or cajole but as part of our overall growth, to expand and challenge our own personal, long-held beliefs. You need a dissenting opinion as a prerequisite to any rigorous debate that can help us all build a stronger, healthier society.

• The big questions must be asked and answered as part of any discussions that lead to far-reaching consequences. Throughout the pandemic we hosted nearly 50 guests on our Digital Freedom Platform (and continue to do so) ranging from scientists, authors, politicians, philosophers and just about everybody else who had found themselves on the wrong side of the government and big tech coordinated crackdown that led an almost daily deplatforming of anyone who happened to query the mainstream narrative.

• One of those guests who completely changed my perspective on vaccines and the surrounding science was Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Robert of course is the nephew of former U.S. President John F. Kennedy and an environmental activist, attorney, author and freedom fighter who has spent his working life challenging those in power and the purpose and practices of some of the biggest organisations on the planet.

Robert was educated at Harvard and the London School of Economics, graduating in 1976 with a Bachelor of Arts in American History and Literature. He also received a doctorate and master’s degrees in law from the University of Virginia and Pace University before beginning his career firstly as assistant to the District Attorney of New York in 1983 and then settling into a position that would form a new direction in his life, as Chief Attorney for the non-profit organisation, Riverkeeper.

Riverkeeper’s sole aim was the preservation of the Hudson River and Robert really found his calling as he helped initiate environmental actions and litigate those companies responsible for polluting and contaminating the waterways.

Time Magazine heralded Robert as one of their “Heroes for the Planet” and this informed the decision to create the Waterkeeper Alliance – an umbrella organisation that helped spawn nearly 350 similar groups across the planet, all dedicated to promoting “swimmable, fishable, drinkable waterways.”

Conservationism and environmental concerns form the backbone of Robert’s service to the world, his commitment to ensuring clean air and water for all, is a truly admirable campaign. And, alongside this, he became Chairman of the Children’s Health Defense, a non-profit that looks at the spiralling epidemic of chronic health conditions and autoimmune diseases in children, reportedly a consequence of increasing exposure to certain dangerous chemicals.

His articles have appeared in a range of publications such as The New York Times, Washington Post, Los Angeles Times, The Wall Street Journal, Newsweek and Rolling Stone. He is a fierce and uncompromising advocate for healing the planet and its people and promotes the need to protect our natural resources and allow everyone access to our most fundamental and essential rights.

However, over the last 2 plus years Robert has found himself as the poster boy for the “anti-vax” movement in a manner portrayed by the mainstream media that ignores his depth of understanding and incredibly detailed scientific research. In return, Robert has been on a mission to expose the contradictory and draconian response to COVID-19 by the government and the World Health Organisation, which he sees as being spearheaded by one man, Dr Anthony Fauci.

Robert’s bestselling book ‘The Real Anthony Fauci’ that sold over 1 million copies despite extreme censorship and a near total media blackout, breaks down how Dr Fauci has enabled the big pharmaceutical companies to make enormous profits that have come at the expense of public health. It is an incredibly detailed account that leaves no stone unturned. So important is the information it reveals, that this October will see the release of a two part documentary on the topic.

Robert’s most recent book, ‘A Letter to Liberals: Censorship and COVID: An Attack on Science and American Ideals’, explores the impact of the government response to COVID-19, the data relating to the vaccine rollout, the efficacy of masks, lockdowns and everything in between, including the influence big pharma had on government mandates, while diving deep on the dwindling values of the Democratic Party, once the home of healthy scepticism and critical thinking.

“Complex scientific and moral problems are not resolved through censorship of dissenting opinions, deleting content from the Internet, or defaming scientists and authors who present information challenging to those in power. Censorship leads instead to a greater distrust of both government institutions and large corporations.”

Robert is currently writing two more books, ‘The Wuhan Cover Up – How US Health Officials Conspired with the Chinese Military to Hide the Origins of COVID-19’ and ‘Vax-Unvax – Let the Science Speak’ which go one step further in exposing the truly complex web of control and censorship at the heart of this story. This is a huge episode and I urge you not to miss it, so be sure to tune in and share it with friends and family alike.
Download clips

A number of clips from this groundbreaking conversation are now available to download, share and repost. Spread the word and defend our human rights: grab these clips today!

• It was all about the priorities of big pharma
• How Pfizer vaccine was tested
• Pfizer vaccine causing cardiac arrest
• The conflicts of interest in vaccine safety research
• Mainstream media is an extension of big pharma
• Big tech companies and censorship
• CIA’s relationship with Silicon Valley
• A letter to liberals
• This is what Anthony Fauci did to us
• The liberals lack critical thinking
• Complete obedience to authorities
• Tell me where I got it wrong
• Unvaccinated people are much healthier
• The agenda and the pandemic

Full episode download click here

• Robert F. Kennedy Jr. – Censorship, Fauci & The Truth About Big Pharma

Watch Full Episode Here


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v3l0yba/?pub=1hi16y

[Pris]

.

Posted by Pris (here)
.
.
The Canadian government wants to bring in a bill to regulate the streamers/podcasters that makes over $10 million in revenue. The streamers/podcasters would be required to register themselves to the government and hand over information about their content and the people listening. Nice little continuing worldwide effort the globalists have going on to squash humanity, eh?


Canada's New Regulations for Podcasts

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lqsUH2-AgA8

Link to post:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/sho...=1#post1580924

[ExomatrixTV]

• Jordan Peterson EXPOSES Full Panel Of Low IQ Politicians Discussing CENSORSHIP:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=tJPVNC2YIG0