Here are three more questions I would like to explore and seek answers to:Posted by Curiosity (here)
DEW? If we are to believe such a weapon was used in 9/11 we have to ask a few questions.
Who would have access to such?
How would it work?
Where would it have been fired from?
What would it do?
We're taking the idea that it looked like dustifacation, then saying it must have been some kind of energy weapon without producing credible verifiable information to those questions.
So lets see what we can come up with.
here is what I've found on my first attempts .
http://www.space.com/1934-weapons-di...t-century.html
http://www.onr.navy.mil/en/Media-Cen...y-Weapons.aspx
I'm sure Judy Woods must have some info to back these claims, or something to verify the existence of a DEW that could produce such results.
1. How does a space based, or even terrestrial based DEW, attack four sides of a square building simultaneously to create the symmetrical collapse spectacle? (In the case of WTC2, everything below the tilted section point)
2. How does a DEW begin the attack at the damaged impact zones and not the roof?
3. What energy source is there and what amounts would be required to do all of this work?
Do you see the logistics problem here?
If it were space based it would have to be very accurate and be attacking from four compass points at once, at an angle to avoid hitting the roof first. It would have to be able to move downwards as well and be able to penetrate any debris that got in the way of "seeing" the floors not yet attacked. Can you really expect a satellite to be that accurate? After all we are talking about an extremely high energy event, not a cell phone call.
If it were ground based, it would have to be set up in surrounding buildings, with a clear view of the entire tower and require a sufficient power source..
So the candidates might look something like this, the Deutschebank (S), WTC7 (N), the Millenium Hotel (E) and the WFC (W)
But the DB was damaged by WTC2 collapse and WTC7 was damaged by WTC1. Would this DEW be able to do its work through a closed window, or would it have to be mounted on the roof?
In the case of WTC2, a significant portion of the core remained for a short time after the facade and floors fell way. It succumbed as a unit, dropping straight down, though the imagery doesn't tell us if it was top down or bottom up. Did the DEW miss hitting this portion of the core?.
Please don't hand wave all of the logistics away by saying, "Oh well, everything is possible, because we don't know anything about the weapon." That is way too convenient.