Posted by thepainterdoug
(here)
Hi all
I recently spent an afternoon listening to Christopher Bollyn present his extensive research on 9/11 .
http://www.bollyn.com Chris is a great guy and he has done an enormous amount of research in which many in the community agree with.
However, I part ways with him on the how, the mechanics of the event etc, but agree with most of his other research as to the who's, the motive, the who benefits and so on.
Many in the community have no tolerance for this and see this as partial truth and a "limited hangout" It seems you either have to be 100% correct on everything or your put into a disinfo bin.
The Dr Judy Wood view , that the buildings dustified makes sense to me when looking at seismic records,( the lack of ), the free fall speed, the fireman surviving in stairwell B looking up and seeing blue sky the hollowing out of building 6 and the lack of a rubble
pile from 2- 500thousand ton buildings. it just doesn't add up.
This is in agreement by Andrew Johnson, Rich Hall and many others.
The Richard Gage view is thermite, which Chris Bollyn agrees with among many.
Then there is the no plane idea/ Morgan Reynolds, John Lear, etc
And Gordon Duff and company on the mini nukes idea.
What I would like an opinion on is, do you feel that for research to be valid, it has to be all in agreement with a particular theory or camp ? Can you accept that one may have the answer in one area and not another? Or do you require all to be aligned with one view?
I ask this because I don't see any progress being made if all are constantly calling the others, disinfo agents and fighting. Any newly awakening person needs to get their foot in the door on this most complex and perplexing event. Isn't it enough to get a person to be willing to accept that it was not what the government has told us? Then go from there.
I believe the info isn't in yet to understand this event. Knowing what Tesla was on to 75 years ago and seeing what the Hutchinson effect shows us must be the tip of the iceberg in my view of the incredible tech being hidden from all.
Is it all or nothing at all with these schools of thought? I am taken back by the lack of tolerance on many sites when you see it in a number of ways. Thoughts?
Thanks much! D