WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Five years ago today, Ed died. I let Sam Husseini know that this morning, and he Tweeted it. How we miss Ed.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

On more lives of the saints ( ), I regularly go to this NDE repository (I have read all off the accounts there), and the latest one is very similar to Brian’s car-accident NDE.

Best,

wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

On Wednesday, I got the below from Greer’s organization. This is the highest-profile free energy effort since Dennis’s in 1996.


“We have 3 goals for this film.

• To create a global movement to bring out New Energy immediately to heal the environment and end global poverty;

• To identify an inventor with an existing device who has learned the lessons of past failed strategies and is willing to work with us on effective open-source strategies to quickly disclose the technology globally;

• To identify funding partners in the range of $50-100 million to build a lab that can develop these technologies, livestream the R and D and open source all discoveries without intellectual property restrictions. Humanity and the Earth are out of time for any other solution!”

I have written about Greer’s efforts for many years (1, 2), and have written on his latest effort, which has inspired me to start a new thread on what my ideal free energy effort would look like, and how Greer’s effort stacks up against it. As I have written, he gets some important issues right, while other aspects make me leery. Some of it is understandable, but may turn into the Achilles’ heels of his effort. I have seen too many lives wrecked and shortened in this pursuit. This is far from new territory for me, on what my ideal effort would look like, but I’ll write on it in coming days.

Best,

Wade

[wegge]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
Hi:

On Wednesday, I got the below from Greer’s organization. This is the highest-profile free energy effort since Dennis’s in 1996.


“We have 3 goals for this film.

• To create a global movement to bring out New Energy immediately to heal the environment and end global poverty;

• To identify an inventor with an existing device who has learned the lessons of past failed strategies and is willing to work with us on effective open-source strategies to quickly disclose the technology globally;

• To identify funding partners in the range of $50-100 million to build a lab that can develop these technologies, livestream the R and D and open source all discoveries without intellectual property restrictions. Humanity and the Earth are out of time for any other solution!”

I have written about Greer’s efforts for many years (1, 2), and have written on his latest effort, which has inspired me to start a new thread on what my ideal free energy effort would look like, and how Greer’s effort stacks up against it. As I have written, he gets some important issues right, while other aspects make me leery. Some of it is understandable, but may turn into the Achilles’ heels of his effort. I have seen too many lives wrecked and shortened in this pursuit. This is far from new territory for me, on what my ideal effort would look like, but I’ll write on it in coming days.

Best,

Wade

Hi Wade, I just wanted to offer this snippet from a Jon Rappoport writing (from his Substack blog) on "controlled opposition." I'm not saying you claim any of that here, but I think it's a valueable POV to keep in mind, basically for the whole forum I'd say and maybe the mods find even another good place for it.

"For the past 30 years, I’ve heard these terms thrown around. “Controlled opposition, gate keeper, infiltrator…”

In many cases, there wasn’t a shred of evidence on board. Not even a reasonable circumstantial case.

But people would direct these charges at someone AS IF they had the evidence in the bag.

“Did you read that ridiculous piece Fred wrote? It’s absurd. He’s controlled opposition. Someone higher up put him in an influential position to distract us from the truth, to block us from getting to the bottom of the rabbit hole. He’s an agent. He’s a plant.”

However, Fred actually has:

A blind spot on an issue.

He does good work in other areas, but on issue X he got it wrong.

Fred’s accuser has tried to reach Fred and convince him another issue must be covered, but the accuser couldn’t reach Fred. Therefore, Fred is a deceiver.

Fred isn’t perfect, and his accuser takes that as a sign that Fred must be controlled opposition.

Fred gets it wrong on issue X and then paints himself into a corner and refuses to admit he made a mistake. Instead, he doubles down. He looks ridiculous — so he must be an agent provocateur, a gate keeper, controlled opposition.

Because Fred got it wrong on issue X, everything else he talks about must be some kind of deception and an intentional limited hangout.

Fred’s accuser has spent years researching one particular issue, and Fred doesn’t talk about that issue, so Fred must be intentionally covering up the truth about the issue.

Fred hasn’t been attacked from all sides over the years. Therefore, he’s being protected by higher-ups. He’s controlled opposition.

Fred’s accuser thinks, “Since I know all about issues X, Y, and Z, Fred must know all about them, too, and yet he doesn’t talk about those issues, or he covers them superficially by my elevated standards. Therefore, Fred is a gate keeper, he’s a secret agent, he’s an infiltrator.”

Fred’s accuser has actually been through a very difficult meat grinder — a situation where he was wrongly and heavily attacked for doing a good and righteous thing. And so the accuser tends to be, shall we say, a bit oversensitive. Understandably so.

But then some superficial accusers go down this alley: Since there ARE actual persons who ARE put in place to deceive, confuse, and stir up trouble…Fred must be one of them. (The logic of that argument is stunning.)

People who have a habit of throwing around “controlled opposition” and similar terms, like hot burgers off the grill at a picnic…those people tend to have a paranoid world view (which is justified), but the world view gets out of hand. The world view becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

Right next door to “he’s a gate keeper and controlled opposition,” we have: “He’s distracting us by covering the wrong issues. We should be focused on Q, R, S, not X, Y, Z.”

And it may be true that we should be focused on Q, R, S, but Fred isn’t trying to distract anybody. He thinks X, Y, and Z are important, and they are. Perhaps they’re not as important as Q, R, S, but so what?"


cheers

Christoph

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Christoph:

You are describing the paranoid conspiracist mindset, and it is rampant in cyberspace, as you know. I have seen myself described as somebody else’s sock puppet, I have been plagiarized and impersonated on the Internet, and the trolls swarm wherever I appear. Noam gets called a “Left Gatekeeper,” “Controlled Opposition,” etc. I have watched the media lie about Dennis since the day I met him, and so do the “allies” in the field. Yesterday, I was reading what I wrote more than a decade ago, and it holds up well. Greer is mistrusted by many in the ET/UFO and free energy fields. Oh, the stories I have heard about Greer, but I give him the benefit of the doubt. But this effort should not ride on any individual’s shoulders. We don’t need any more heroic/messianic approaches to this. It is time for something different, but the people with the right stuff need to stop hiding in the shadows and do the work. It is time to step into the light of day, which is why I never allow anonymity in what I am doing.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

As I mentioned in my previous post, yesterday I was reading my work from more than a decade ago, for the first time in years, and it holds up well (or my delusions have not changed ). In this coming string, I plan to take it a little further than I have in the past. As I have written before, any such summary needs to be more about the operating principles than a procedure manual, because everything is in motion, and will be, when the Fifth Epoch arrives, and what is most important is to not lose sight of the stars to steer by. I don’t know of an instance in which we see human ugliness in all of its glory when it is not rooted in scarcity and fear. When love and abundance reign, those human behaviors will disappear.

As I have long stated, any successful effort needs to be rooted in love and enlightenment, not scarcity and fear. The only people that will be of any use for my effort will care, be awake, have a little mental horsepower, be willing and able to do the work to develop a comprehensive perspective, largely so that they keep their eye on the ball and do not get lost in the weeds, and they will learn to sing. There are a million ways to fail to develop the necessary perspective, and only a few to achieve it, in my experience. Adopting conspiracism as a worldview is a very common way to fail, and QAnon was a great recent example of that diseased mindset, which epitomizes the victim’s view of the world. They pinned their hopes on a demagogue like Trump, as if he was Santa coming down the chimney. It is a childish perspective that has no discernment. Keen discernment is required for the task that I have in mind.

So, I am going to start this thread by summarizing my writings from a decade ago. It informed my big essay. I have written plenty on what has not worked and is likely not to, but I really want to write on what might. Some of those pitfalls Greer is trying to avoid, while he wallows in others, but that will come later. For now, what does my ideal effort look like?

• First and most importantly, it must be rooted in love. Everything else is a distant second. The obsession with elite machinations (classic conspiracism), for instance, is not a loving approach, but a fearful one, making elites into one more out-group that needs to be vanquished. In the Fifth Epoch, they will no longer run the show, but they have played a valuable role for a humanity in which people refuse to take responsibility for their lives. My goal is to rehabilitate those elites after they are dethroned, not punish them, which goes for all people. The Fifth Epoch will be about all people’s getting what they need to reach their potential.

• Second, it can’t be money-hungry. This is an issue that almost nobody understands. When any money changes hands, the game changes dramatically and puts the effort at great risk. I don’t need any money to build the choir. I did that purposefully.

• Third, it has to be enlightened, or at least aspire to it. For instance, the most enlightened statement ever given to humanity was to love the enemy, which is another way of saying that we are all one, which is the godhead’s primary message.

• Fourth, at the early stages, the effort cannot afford to dance with the devil. When it gets strong in love and the light, then it can withstand the attacks from the dark pathers and the great herd of humanity in their thrall. Whenever I joined forums where I saw my work being discussed, the trolls swarmed and allied with the admins to chase or kick me out. Avalon is the sole exception of any significance.

• Fifth, each person that gets involved needs to find his/her own personal power and stop seeking it from others. That will only be accomplished by going within and finding love, which likely means that only older souls are fit for this Epochal task.

Dennis, like Greer, tried the commerce route, and going the commerce route jeopardizes those above principles. Dennis is the best there ever was in trying that route, and that was where I did more than 90% of my learning on these issues. I am well aware that I seek rare people, but those are the only people who can assist the effort that I have in mind.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

My previous post dealt with the initial qualities that an ideal free energy effort will have. If it does not have those qualities, it almost certainly will not be successful with the next stage:

• Developing the technology;
• Giving it away, or as close to that ideal as possible;
• Educating the public.

In my envisioning, the first phase needs to attract enough people with the right stuff that form the nucleus that will attract enough “do something” people, to fund and protect the effort to develop the technology. No effort has survived the developing-the-technology phase, at least beyond a working prototype. Greer’s statement that thousands of such efforts have been wiped/bought out by the GCs and friends aligns perfectly with our experiences and those of our fellow travelers. Greer mentioned Sparky in his interview, we had dealings with him, and he had a front-row seat to what happened to us in Ventura. Mark is one of the relative few who have told their stories.

As I have long stated, the capitalist approach will not work for this. Any inventor who tries that route is doomed, and the only hope is to develop it with donor money and essentially give it away to humanity.

Along with giving it away will be educating the public (my primary job ), and not the propaganda that the media produces. But the general public will continue to be oblivious until the technology is delivered into their lives. But once they can experience free energy technology for themselves (and a globally recognized and undeniable demonstration, which I will discuss later, could be sufficient), then they will begin to pay attention. It will be regulated, either by the world’s governments or what replaces them, as they have all been derelict in their duty of serving the public’s wellbeing, to ensure a harmless implementation (not used to further ravage the environment or become weaponized).

If the effort survives the early and intermediate stages, then it will be time to finally get cracking on manifesting the Fifth Epoch. Godzilla’s Golden Hoard is a big one, and antigravity is only one of many mind-blowing technologies that are older than I am. Greer is understandably going for version 1.0 of free energy technology, but what my friend saw a generation ago was version 25.0 or so, and today it is likely 35^th generation technology. Even first generation technology can do this:

• Replace all of today’s energy sources, which will eliminate almost all air pollution;
• We could easily reverse global warming, if we wanted to;
• Even without antigravity, we could mine asteroids for all of humanity’s metal needs, and stop mining Earth;
• All humans would easily have access to pure water, fresh and abundant food, and all of the amenities that Westerners enjoy, and far more; poverty would soon end globally;
• There will be no more ravaging of Earth’s ecosystems for human benefit.

Those would just be starters, as what will quickly come up for reconsidering and likely jettisoning will be:

• Nations;
• Cities as we know them;
• Warfare;
• Exchange professions;
• And much, much more.

The arrival of the Fifth Epoch will mean the end of the world as we know it. Greer knows it, the GCs know it, as does anybody who ponders the situation much.

So, how does Greer’s latest effort stack up against my ideal effort? That will be the subject of coming posts. Maybe he hits enough of the marks to make it over the finish line, and I sure hope so, but a lot of what he does makes me doubtful. Nobody would be happier than me to see his effort succeed.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Briefly, I just read this, by an American journalist, on the USA’s use of Nazis, including in Ukraine. Heck, I could have written it. Very tellingly, it was published at RT, not in the USA, and when I looked to see if it was first published in the USA, I saw that Reddit almost immediately deleted the link to the article. I think that it is safe to say that that article will never appear in the American media.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I emailed a pal in the UK about my Nazi post today and the UK has completely blocked RT, so that my pal in London can’t get to the site. You can’t make this up!

Best,

Wade

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
Hi:

I emailed a pal in the UK about my Nazi post today and the UK has completely blocked RT, so that my pal in London can’t get to the site. You can’t make this up!

Best,

Wade

Wade, I've copied the entire article in full detail to two public Avalon threads here and here. If you reference either of those links anywhere, anyone can now read it all easily.

[Wade Frazier]

Thanks Bill!

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

The last article that Ed posted to the Internet in his lifetime was about how the American media had lied about Russia/Soviet Union for a century. The West’s demonization of Russia was one of Ed’s primary themes in his last years. At the end of that RT article, it quoted Christopher Simpson’s Blowback, which was the first book that I read that was devoted to the USA’s use of Nazis. I read it in the 1990s. I have written about Karl Wolff and Allen Dulles plenty, and the USA’s eager hiring of Nazis. It is very dark material, of course, Dulles likely had a hand in the JFK hit, and covered it up at minimum (which may have been his role). Unfortunately, I am familiar with nearly all of the situations covered in that article, but that grim subject matter is essential for those who want to awaken to the reality of our world.

I was thinking of reproducing that RT article, as RT has been blocked in the UK and elsewhere, and Bill provided a great service by reproducing it at Avalon.

Lately, I have been reading a great deal on Russia/Soviet Union, including books that deal with the Chernobyl disaster (1, 2, 3), and interviews with Soviet children in World War II and those who experienced the collapse of the Soviet Union. The Fifth Epoch can come none too soon.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Back to my ideal free energy effort and Greer’s effort. I got my clock cleaned in the free energy field long before I ever heard of Greer, and my pal got his exotic technology demonstration before I ever heard of Greer. Several years later, I saw Greer’s Disclosure Project witnesses describe what my friend saw, which began to give Greer credibility with me. I bankrolled a conference where Greer spoke, and took a break from running the registration table to hear him speak. When he stated that the GCs had paid out $100 billion in quiet money, it made complete sense to me. That number has likely at least doubled in the 30 years since he was told that.

This week, I got the below in an email from Greer’s organization. In parentheses, I added links to our own experiences of what Greer talks about.

“Methods of suppression:

• "Black-Shelving" – Buyouts (one attempt in Boston, one in Ventura, and Ron Waugh told me a classic story on that subject);
• National Security Orders (not sure how this is different from patent seizures, but maybe it preempts the patent process);
• Patent Seizures for National Security Reasons (it did not happen to us, but we heard about in Ventura from participants)
• Financial Entanglements with Investors (it happened in Seattle, and the theft of our Ventura company was similar);
• Legal Entanglements (Seattle and Ventura, most spectacularly, and it was being tried in Boston, but we left before they could strike);
• Credible Threats to Individuals and/or Their Families (Mr. Researcher, for instance, and Sparky);
• Scientific Fraud (Mallove and MIT);
• Media Corruption (Amen! Ever since the day I met Dennis 1, 2, 3, 4);
• Wetworks (Dennis had a bodyguard the day that I met him, because of all of the death threats, Dennis should not have survived the Ventura experience, and we heard many stories of dead and wounded inventors over the years 1, 2, 3).

“Dr. Greer explains all of these in his presentation from October 25th.
And he will explain them in more detail in "The Lost Century" film. Planned for 2023 release.”


In that email, Greer provided a link to this interview, which is a standard inventor story. That interviewee was also a UFO investigator, and the technical aspects of his way to get high MPG and low pollution were like what Mr. Mentor did, and his troubles with the FTC were familiar. Suppressing stuff like that is just a day at the office for those people. Dennis made the most recent run at high-MPG technology that I know of, then David Rockefeller showed up and it was over.

So, what Greer described is very well known to us, as we lived through it repeatedly. That makes Greer more credible. But, how does Greer’s effort stack up against my ideal effort? That will be the subject of this and coming posts. For starters, Greer was mentored by David Rockefeller’s brother, and that alone makes for raised eyebrows on what Greer is doing. In short, Greer’s effort is:

• Elite-centric;
• Washington, D.C.- centric;
• Hollywood-centric;
• ET-centric;
• Money-hungry;
• Greer-centric;
• Populist;
• Inventor-centric.

Some of that is understandable, some is alarming, and none of that aligns with my ideal free energy effort. The ET-centric aspect is arguably the most benign of the above, and I understand why (most of what my friend saw likely came from reverse-engineered ET technology), but I would not recommend that people seek their mystical awakenings by trying to contact ETs.

Much more is coming.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I’ll address those aspects of Greer’s effort that do not align with my ideal effort. There is potential risk/reward with those aspects of what Greer does, and I’ll address each of them, not necessarily in the order of that list, but I’ll get them all covered. He might get “lucky” and get over the finish line, or it can crash and burn with wrecked and shortened lives. My involvement in the free energy field began in the 1980s, and I really have not kept up much on the state of the field for nearly the past 20 years, although with a quasi-public presence, I can’t help but be aware of a lot of it. I have seen nothing that indicates that the field will move past its arrested development anytime soon, and the behaviors of high-profile people in the milieu are regularly scandalous and even criminal (1, 2, 3).

In short, there won’t be an ideal free energy effort. That would take a gathering of saints who do not exist on Earth. But, can an effort do enough of the right things, without doing too many of the wrong things? Greer is throwing in his line. The odds are long against an effort that could work, but I understand Greer’s sense of urgency. I am used to long odds. When I sacrificed my life to give Dennis a snowball’s chance, I figured that it would be a futile gesture, but then the biggest miracle that I ever witnessed happened.

I am going to start with the last item on that list, first. I’ll buy Greer’s statement that thousands of energy technologies have been suppressed. That alone should make it very clear that an inventor with a gizmo is meaningless in this milieu – they are a dime a dozen. Inventors are really a small piece of the puzzle, and the arrested development in the free energy field is largely because of the focus on inventors, but also scientists and promoters. Those will not be the focus of the effort that I have in mind.

While Greer eventually came to understand that the standard inventor predilections – patents, keeping it proprietary, chasing after investors – are dead ends, his effort is still highly inventor-centric. He has chased after inventors for 30 years or so, and gradually became less naïve over the years, or at least it seems that way. I never met an inventor who was not trying to get rich and famous, and those are the worst allies for an effort like this. They easily sell out to the highest bidder, and nobody’s pockets are as deep as the GCs’. I grew up in an inventor’s workshop. Inventors are not the answer.

Best,

Wade

[wegge]

Wade, when you researched the other "Epochs of Energy," could you find clues as to how the years leading up to the breakthrough looked?

Were there mini-breakthroughs, incremental steps, overnight successes, lonely inventors, groups or "choirs"?

Was there awareness of what the next step could be, as in our case?

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Christoph:

Great questions. My upcoming essay will answer them better than I have done so far. Nobody ever saw the previous Epochs coming. They could not even imagine them. If we make it into the Fifth Epoch, this will be the first one that had people like me writing about it before it happened. The human journey has always been predicated on energy, intelligence, and tools.

There was actually resistance to the previous two Epochal transitions. Hunter-gatherers often fought against the agriculturalists who invaded their lands (and held them off for centuries sometimes), but they always lost in the end. Many times, they adopted domestic crops themselves and settled down. Those who didn’t got pushed into marginal lands where agriculture would not work, or they went extinct, especially the men. When the Industrial Revolution began, you had Luddites and others who actually mobbed factories and tore the machines apart. They saw their jobs going away and acted accordingly.

So, the fear and denial that have been the standard reactions to the idea of free energy, and the organized suppression from the elite, are actually fairly typical reactions.

In previous Epochs, the way that they unfolded has been a fascinating study and replete with controversy. Heck, the transition to the Fourth Epoch happened only a few centuries ago and was well documented, and that one is still highly controversial, as far as what happened and why, so imagine the controversies for those transitions that happened before recorded history. Those are the province of scientists to study, and it has been quite a ride to study them.

To your questions, of little “victories,” lone wolf inventors, groups, and the like, I’ll write about those to the extent I am able. Again, there were not really any visionaries who saw them coming, partly because they could not imagine what was coming (the science of energy is less than two centuries old, and energy is still denigrated in economics and biology, incredibly). Early in our Epoch, there were some people who imagined what our Epoch could lead to, such as Jules Verne and H.G. Wells. But they could not have imagined their books before the rise of machines.

For the past two Epochal transitions, I’ll write plenty on those. For the domestication transition, there were a few likely factors:

• The megafauna had been largely hunted to extinction, so hunting declined;
• Population increases and dwindling food (and climate variation) led to experiments with domestication; they often took centuries and even millennia to develop today’s crops, and were likely not very conscious efforts, such as, “Let’s all domesticate wheat.”
• The relative warmth and increasing carbon dioxide levels of the interglacial period that we live in made plant domestication feasible.

For this Epoch, in hindsight, it is relatively easy to see it coming in Europe, and it really began in the Medieval Warm Period, with the explosion of watermills in Northwestern Europe, in what has been called the Medieval Industrial Revolution. Also, Europe benefited from other Eurasian innovations (the horse collar, printing press, gunpowder, and the compass came from China, for instance, and Islamic culture preserved the Greek writings that had been destroyed in Christian Europe as “pagan”), but the watershed moments were when Europe turned the world’s ocean into a low-energy transportation lane, and thus conquered humanity, and when a deforested England turned to coal. They were all related, and the Scientific Revolution, which was dependent on the printing press, happened in the middle of that, which was a cognitive revolution. The interdependencies of those are hotly debated to this day. Big subjects.

If a tiny fraction of humanity can muster sufficient integrity and sentience to overcome humanity’s inertia and the organized suppression, the Fifth Epoch will arrive, and that will be the biggest event in the human journey, by far, and humanity will live in something resembling a Star Trek future.

I hope that that addresses your questions, at least somewhat. My upcoming writings will address those subjects in depth.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Back to those aspects of Greer’s effort. It is OK to be leery of anybody, particularly in this milieu, who was mentored by David Rockefeller’s brother. Our encounters with the Rockefellers were not pleasant. The Rockefellers epitomize the retail elite, and are not at the top of the world’s power structure, conspiracist rumor-mongering aside. Because of his Rockefeller affiliations, and many others, many people wonder just how genuine Greer’s effort is, and I don’t blame them.

He may not do it as much as he used to, but in his UFO/ET gatherings a generation ago, he could not stop talking about all of his elite connections, which really turned off people who came to his events, to the extent that they would leave in the middle of them, and some had crossed the globe to be there. I know for a fact that aspects of his public persona are a sham. Some is understandable, as I saw Dennis play the image-management game, too.

Greer’s home is far from modest, but is more like an estate, with groundskeepers and the like. I have heard second-hand about his disgust with the masses, but I saw Dennis wrestle with that, too, and Brian eventually wondered if we were a sentient species. The view from the high road can be an ugly one.

Near his life’s end, Brian admitted his codependence with Washington, D.C., and Greer seems to have the same issue, as he constantly talks about his encounters with politicians and military officials in Washington. Greer regularly talks about pressuring politicians to do the right thing.

In that interview that inspired this thread, Greer’s Hollywood obsession is also evident, name-dropping Leonardo DiCaprio, interviewing with celebrities such as Demi Lovato, doing red carpet premiers, chasing after social media influencers, hobnobbing with billionaires, etc. His work has always been very elite-centric, Washington, D.C.-centric, and Hollywood-centric. Many find those aspects of Greer’s efforts alarming, and the question that I have is whether there is more downside than upside with those approaches, even if Greer was the best person for the job (for the record, the only two people that I trusted in the free energy milieu were Dennis and Brian).

Billionaires swarmed Dennis, too, when he was riding high, and I met one of them within a few months of becoming Dennis’s partner. The so-called billionaire philanthropists are as plentiful as unicorns. They are nearly all phony, as far as I know, vultures at best, and those who aren’t get horse heads in their beds to dissuade them. One activist pal said after interacting with the “philanthropists” for years: “If vegetarians eat vegetables, what do humanitarians eat?” Bill Gates is a misanthrope, but nearly all of them are. Gates literally modeled his “humanitarian” efforts after the Rockefellers. True humanitarians don’t become billionaires in our world. That is not how our world works. It is the most ruthless who rise to those heights, with maybe some partial exceptions in high-tech, but don’t count on it.

As distasteful as interacting with those milieus can be, the question is whether that approach can work. I strongly doubt it. Also, what all of that elite-obsession does is give our power away. I have called it the beseeching route, and I have not seen a free energy effort that did not do that, whether it is retail politics, NGOs, “philanthropists,” etc. What that does is give our power away to the corrupt, naïve, and the like, trying to entice or pressure them into doing the right thing. I have no interest in that route, and I strongly doubt that any of that will work. Those routes have been tried literally thousands of times.

Brian said it best, that the effort with a chance will have combined positive intention as its center-of-gravity. It will not look to elites and beseech the rich and powerful, but will ignore them and do its best to weather the attacks that inevitably ensue, as the public’s welfare is the furthest thing from the minds of those elites.

Best,

Wade

[Michi]

Hi Wade

Actually I was searching for some info about Greer's video: "BREAKING NEWS: Dr. Greer Announces Discovery of 4 New Energy Technologies That Could Save The Earth!" and found you writing about it.
Before watching an hour video, I tried to find out, what it is all about. I watched too many lengthy videos in the past only to discover to my disappointment - it was just a click-bait in order to sell something.
Thus I commented on the above Greer's YT video:

If it could save the earth - why not disclose them here. If the video get's banned, we know we hit something. Otherwise it's just click-bait.

In your above article you also don't spare on words - and I was looking for what you consider the optimum approach to get free energy out on the open. So I checked your link about "my approach" and read a bit about your Humanity’s Fifth Epochal Event: Free Energy and an Abundance-Based Political Economy

While I agree with your points you make (In summary, here are some approaches that have never come close to working and likely never will, and why:) I am yet looking for an answer to "how to get free energy technology released broadly".

My suspicion is that a perfect trick could do the trick - meaning releasing something else and -- oops, this thing delivers free energy.

So, whats your envisioned free energy release strategy - in summary

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Michi:

I think that my strategy is clear.

Best,

Wade

[Michi]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
Hi Michi:

I think that my strategy is clear.

Best,

Wade

Well - uh, I would have actually expected some discussion where you would take up some of my post content, and a summary (which I have asked for) - and then at the end perhaps a link.