The Third Secret of Fatima

[Isserley]

Today is Assumption of Mary - a Catholic holiday that is quite significant. I'm currently watching the movie Fatima from 2020 on TV. I recommend it, it's not a bad adaptation

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=d1f_9_TGlpI

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Isserley (here)
Today is Assumption of Mary - a Catholic holiday that is quite significant. I'm currently watching the movie Fatima from 2020 on TV. I recommend it, it's not a bad adaptation

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=d1f_9_TGlpI

Thanks — I didn't know this film had been made. I found it, and here's a download link valid for 7 days. I've not watched it yet, but the audience appreciation scores on Rotten Tomatoes are 96%. And I'll trust Isserley's recommendation!

• https://we.tl/t-kKwQpeP2jz (1.4Gb mp4)

[Bill Ryan]

Here's a new interview with Xavier Reyes-Ayral, which is all about Fatima, Akita, Garabandal, and more, with much about the 19th century French stigmatist Marie-Julie Jahenny (her extremely interesting Wiki page here). Xavier is very articulate and pleasant (with his strong French accent), and I do find him most easy to listen to.

Prophecy, War, and the Secrets of Fatima

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cJoTYsvijuY

[Bill Ryan]

The prophesied apostasy* in the Catholic Church seems to be in full accelerating swing. The significance here is not the story itself, but that most, if not all, Marian Apparitions have clearly stated this to be one of the principal harbingers of the devastating 'End Times'.

* apostasy: 1. an act of refusing to continue to follow, obey, or recognize a religious faith. 2. abandonment of a previous loyalty.

The article headline refers to 'Conservative Catholics', but of course Catholicism is almost by definition a Conservative Faith, and always has been. That's the point.

https://zerohedge.com/political/cons...izing-same-sex

Conservative Catholics Outraged, Confused After Pope Francis Letter On 'Blessing' Same-Sex Unions

Pope Francis has once again sparked immense controversy with his widely perceived liberalizing policies and ambiguity related to hotly contested moral issues, this time angering conservative Catholics by appearing to soften the Vatican's longtime ban on blessing gay couples, as a Wall Street Journal headline revealed this week.

The shift has unleashed a significant degree of confusion within the Roman Catholic world, with some leading conservative clerics and pundits accusing Francis of paving the way for eventual full 'recognition' of same-sex unions.



(...the article continues)

[Harmony]

There is this video also, Archbishop Vigano- An Unprecedented Apostacy, which sounds very serious and taking a stance against the current pope.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=K98-fjc4qcE

[Ravenlocke]

https://x.com/RadioGenoa/status/1709606151782875546

[Ravenlocke]

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/br...source=twitter

Five cardinals write Dubia to Pope Francis on concerns about Synod, Catholic doctrine

VATICAN CITY (LifeSiteNews) — Five prominent cardinals have submitted dubia to Pope Francis about the Synod on Synodality, asking five urgent questions about possible attacks on the Church’s doctrines, including the possibility of homosexual blessings, the weight of teaching afforded to the synod, female ordination, and the necessity of repentance in sacramental Confession.

Broken to the Catholic public on October 2, news of previously private correspondence between five cardinals and Pope Francis, expressing grave concerns about the upcoming Synod on Synodality, was revealed. They highlighted the urgency of the synod as a catalyst for the intervention, noting the synod as an event “which many want to use to deny Catholic doctrine on the very issues which our dubia concern.”

The Dubia have been written and submitted by Cardinals Walter Brandmüller, former prefect of the Pontifical Committee for Historical Sciences; Raymond Leo Burke, former prefect of the Apostolic Signatura; Juan Sandoval Íñiguez, former Archbishop of Guadalajara; Robert Sarah, the former prefect of the Dicastery for Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments; and Joseph Zen, the former bishop of Hong Kong. Both Brandmüller and Burke were signatories of the previous Dubia submitted to the Pope in 2016 about Amoris Laetitia.

Veteran Vatican journalist Sandro Magister wrote that the five cardinals recognized the late Cardinal George Pell “shared these ‘dubia’ and would have been the first to endorse them.”

READ: Vatican and Cardinal Fernández fire back at cardinals’ new dubia about the Synod on Synodality

Background

Magister provided a copy of the letters and a history of the events which led to the correspondence emerging now. (The correspondence is also found on Messa in Latino, on the site of America TFP, and is produced below.)

The five cardinals first wrote to the Pope on July 10, presenting him with five Dubia. This, according to Magister, Pope Francis responded to in writing on July 11, which was received by the cardinals on July 13.

According to Magister, the seven-page letter in Spanish bore Francis’ signature but “the letter displayed the writing style of his trusted theologian, the Argentine Victor Manuel Fernández,” who was made cardinal on September 30 and assumed control of the Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith on September 11.

Since this reply was “vague and elusive” and did not answer the Dubia, the five cardinals wrote again to the Pope on August 21. They rewrote the Dubia so that it could be answered in simple terms of “yes” or “no.”

This time, Pope Francis reportedly made no answer, which led to the five cardinals issuing the Dubia to the Catholic faithful, along with a note addressed to the faithful explaining their actions.

Writing to the Catholic faithful about the Dubia, the cardinals state:

Given the gravity of the matter of the “dubia,” especially in view of the imminent session of the Synod of Bishops, we judge it our duty to inform you, the faithful (can. 212 § 3), so that you may not be subject to confusion, error, and discouragement but rather may pray for the universal Church and, in particular, the Roman Pontiff, that the Gospel may be taught ever more clearly and followed ever more faithfully.

The five, clear questions of the rewritten Dubia pertain to issues which have surrounded the synodal process and which have also been expanded on by Pope Francis in recent weeks.

The cardinals ask (full text produced below):

Is it possible for the Church today to teach doctrines contrary to those she has previously taught in matters of faith and morals, whether by the Pope ex cathedra, or in the definitions of an Ecumenical Council, or in the ordinary universal magisterium of the Bishops dispersed throughout the world (cf. Lumen Gentium 25)?
Is it possible that in some circumstances a pastor could bless unions between homosexual persons, thus suggesting that homosexual behavior as such would not be contrary to God’s law and the person’s journey toward God? Linked to this dubium is the need to raise another: does the teaching upheld by the universal ordinary magisterium, that every sexual act outside of marriage, and in particular homosexual acts, constitutes an objectively grave sin against God’s law, regardless of the circumstances in which it takes place and the intention with which it is carried out, continue to be valid?
Will the Synod of Bishops to be held in Rome, and which includes only a chosen representation of pastors and faithful, exercise, in the doctrinal or pastoral matters on which it will be called to express itself, the Supreme Authority of the Church, which belongs exclusively to the Roman Pontiff and, una cum capite suo, to the College of Bishops (cf. can. 336 C.I.C.)?
Could the Church in the future have the faculty to confer priestly ordination on women, thus contradicting that the exclusive reservation of this sacrament to baptized males belongs to the very substance of the Sacrament of Orders, which the Church cannot change?
Can a penitent who, while admitting a sin, refuses to make, in any way, the intention not to commit it again, validly receive sacramental absolution?
Original version of the Dubia, as submitted to the Pope July 10

1. Dubium about the claim that we should reinterpret Divine Revelation according to the cultural and anthropological changes in vogue.

After the statements of some Bishops, which have been neither corrected nor retracted, it is asked whether in the Church Divine Revelation should be reinterpreted according to the cultural changes of our time and according to the new anthropological vision that these changes promote; or whether Divine Revelation is binding forever, immutable and therefore not to be contradicted, according to the dictum of the Second Vatican Council, that to God who reveals is due “the obedience of faith” (Dei Verbum 5); that what is revealed for the salvation of all must remain “in their entirety, throughout the ages” and alive, and be “transmitted to all generations” (7); and that the progress of understanding does not imply any change in the truth of things and words, because faith has been “handed on…once and for all” (8), and the Magisterium is not superior to the Word of God, but teaches only what has been handed on (10).

2. Dubium about the claim that the widespread practice of the blessing of same-sex unions would be in accord with Revelation and the Magisterium (CCC 2357).

According to Divine Revelation, confirmed in Sacred Scripture, which the Church “at the divine command with the help of the Holy Spirit,…listens to devotedly, guards it with dedication and expounds it faithfully” (Dei Verbum 10): “In the beginning” God created man in his own image, male and female he created them and blessed them, that they might be fruitful (cf. Gen. 1, 27-28), whereby the Apostle Paul teaches that to deny sexual difference is the consequence of the denial of the Creator (Rom 1, 24-32). It is asked: Can the Church derogate from this “principle,” considering it, contrary to what Veritatis Splendor 103 taught, as a mere ideal, and accepting as a “possible good” objectively sinful situations, such as same-sex unions, without betraying revealed doctrine?

3. Dubium about the assertion that synodality is a “constitutive element of the Church” (Apostolic Constitution Episcopalis Communio 6), so that the Church would, by its very nature, be synodal.

Given that the Synod of Bishops does not represent the College of Bishops but is merely a consultative organ of the Pope, since the Bishops, as witnesses of the faith, cannot delegate their confession of the truth, it is asked whether synodality can be the supreme regulative criterion of the permanent government of the Church without distorting her constitutive order willed by her Founder, whereby the supreme and full authority of the Church is exercised both by the Pope by virtue of his office and by the College of Bishops together with its head the Roman Pontiff (Lumen Gentium 22).

4. Dubium about pastors’ and theologians’ support for the theory that “the theology of the Church has changed” and therefore that priestly ordination can be conferred on women.

After the statements of some prelates, which have been neither corrected nor retracted, according to which, with Vatican II, the theology of the Church and the meaning of the Mass has changed, it is asked whether the dictum of the Second Vatican Council is still valid, that “[the common priesthood of the faithful and the ministerial or hierarchical priesthood] differ essentially and not only in degree” (Lumen Gentium 10) and that presbyters by virtue of the “sacred power of Order, that of offering sacrifice and forgiving sins” (Presbyterorum Ordinis 2), act in the name and in the person of Christ the Mediator, through Whom the spiritual sacrifice of the faithful is made perfect. It is furthermore asked whether the teaching of St. John Paul II’s Apostolic Letter Ordinatio Sacerdotalis, which teaches as a truth to be definitively held the impossibility of conferring priestly ordination on women, is still valid, so that this teaching is no longer subject to change nor to the free discussion of pastors or theologians.

5. Dubium about the statement “forgiveness is a human right” and the Holy Father’s insistence on the duty to absolve everyone and always, so that repentance would not be a necessary condition for sacramental absolution.

It is asked whether the teaching of the Council of Trent, according to which the contrition of the penitent, which consists in detesting the sin committed with the intention of sinning no more (Session XIV, Chapter IV: DH 1676), is necessary for the validity of sacramental confession, is still in force, so that the priest must postpone absolution when it is clear that this condition is not fulfilled.

Vatican City, 10 July 2023

Walter Card. Brandmüller
Raymond Leo Card. Burke
Juan Card. Sandoval Íñiguez
Robert Card. Sarah
Joseph Card. Zen Ze-Kiun, S.D.B.
Second version of the Dubia submitted August 21

The rest here,

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/br...source=twitter

[Ravenlocke]

https://x.com/ArmorofFaithRad/status...30369263083521

Text:

Here is something to consider at the #Synod #SynodonSynodality

‘75% of Gay People Find Open Marriages "Acceptable"’

The slippery slope, the nose of a camel in a tent, etc.

“In that letter we find written: ‘The final battle between the Lord and the kingdom of satan will be about Marriage and the Family.’ Don't be afraid, she added, because whoever works for the sanctity of Marriage and the Family will always be fought against and opposed in every way, because this is the decisive issue. Then she concluded: ‘nevertheless, Our Lady has already crushed his head’.” -
@cnalive
“Fatima visionary predicted 'final battle' would be over marriage, family” 10/13/2021

75% of Gay People Find Open Marriages "Acceptable" http://metroweekly.com/2023/09/75-of-… via
@metroweekly

https://x.com/NYCatholicRadio/status...14731514589645

[Ravenlocke]

Posted by Ravenlocke (here)
https://x.com/RadioGenoa/status/1709606151782875546

Ok so I found the video here and not censored yet.

https://x.com/realstewpeters/status/1709607457859813814

[Bill Ryan]

This looks potnetially significant. (Kudos to Harmony for finding this and letting me know )

• https://casorosendi.com/2023/10/06/r...ation-to-a-nun

Recent revelation to a nun

I received this early in the morning on October 6. I publish it here for your discernment. I was told the author is Lucas Gelasio from Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. We will know soon (before October 31) if this was a true revelation or not.

~~~

On the morning of August 8th, a nun from the Northeast — of whom I have already spoken on a recent occasion — received another revelation. She’s not sure if she was asleep or awake, but she remembers perfectly to have spoken with Our Lord, as it occurs in an interior locution.

— Daughter, conflicts will increase… — then there was a brief silence.
— When, Lord?
— I told you through My Mother and My prophet. It will start in October.
— But how will this come to pass?
— In the City of Sun, in Poland, a dangerous artifact will burst. This will lead other nations to enter into war. Some, because they will be hit; others to fight for their allies.
— Then will it be WW3 worldwide?
— It will be the third major war, but not all nations will enter it. Those that do not enter, they will support the others through prayer. They will be for the most part very Catholic nations.
— And when will this war end?
— It will last a few years, but it will come to an end by the mediation of Japan. This country, which had two cities devastated at the end of the WW2, will demonstrate to the world the strength of forgiveness and, through a heroic act that will put an end to WW3.

The conversation ended there. After praying over what she had experienced, the nun did some research on the city. She found a village called Söl and a town called Nowa Söl. I add that it is possible also that the word “Sun” was not said in Polish, but in Portuguese therefore, it may refer to some city like Wielka Słońca, whose translation would be “Great Sun”. We don’t know which locality the prophecy refers to exactly.

I remind everyone that these revelations are given to us to let us know that God has control over everything, and that we must pray for the punishment to be mitigated or even suppressed. Let us pray for Poland and, in particular, for that location that was here called “Sun City”.

Lucas Gelasio — Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

[Kryztian]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
— But how will this come to pass?
— In the City of Sun, in Poland, a dangerous artifact will burst. This will lead other nations to enter into war. Some, because they will be hit; others to fight for their allies.

the nun did some research on the city. She found a village called Söl and a town called Nowa Söl. I add that it is possible also that the word “Sun” was not said in Polish, but in Portuguese therefore, it may refer to some city like Wielka Słońca, whose translation would be “Great Sun”. We don’t know which locality the prophecy refers to exactly.

So why is their a graphic of "Frombork" at the bottom of the page? I don't believe the town name has anything to do with the sun.

I located the city on a map, and one interesting thing is that is is just a few miles from the Russian state of Kalingrad, which is a part of Russia, not contiguous with Russia, surrounded by Poland, Lithuania and the Baltic Sea. Kalingrad is a hotspot in the current conflict because those two surrounding countries have tried to block Russia from accessing the area via train. I think it was also an important military zone during the Soviet area.

[I am B]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Here's a new interview with Xavier Reyes-Ayral, which is all about Fatima, Akita, Garabandal, and more, with much about the 19th century French stigmatist Marie-Julie Jahenny (her extremely interesting Wiki page here). Xavier is very articulate and pleasant (with his strong French accent), and I do find him most easy to listen to.

Prophecy, War, and the Secrets of Fatima

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=cJoTYsvijuY

I've been checking on avalon way way more sporadically lately. I'm keeping my phone on a faraday bag most of the time to keep it at bay for a while. Still, 5/6 days ago, after time without being around, I just watched this video only, that somehow resonated greatly with me, it felt right. I must add that although I appreciate everything religious and spiritual, I don't consider myself a catholic per se. Something similar happened with the Anglo Saxon mission one (thats why I am here in fact)

Anyways, all this to say, that given what just seems to have started in Israel, I have a gut feeling that unfortunately it seems to have going this way, the fatima one, and the Anglo Saxon mission too.

[Bill Ryan]

More from Xavier Ayral, who I've come to greatly value and appreciate. I've NOT yet listened to this, but I strongly suspect it promises to be interesting to anyone who's been following this thread.

Israel’s Fate, Catholic Prophecy, and the Start of World War 3

https://rumble.com/v3olfva-israels-fate-catholic-prophecy-and-the-start-of-world-war-3.html

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v3m01wg

[Kryztian]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
More from Xavier Ayral, who I've come to greatly value and appreciate. I've NOT yet listened to this, but I strongly suspect it promises to be interesting to anyone who's been following this thread.

Israel’s Fate, Catholic Prophecy, and the Start of World War 3

https://rumble.com/v3olfva-israels-fate-catholic-prophecy-and-the-start-of-world-war-3.html

Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v3m01wg

One question for someone who speaks French. At 23:50 Xavier Reyes-Ayral mentions a Marian visionary who's first name is Marie but I can not make sense of the second: it is something like "Reej-Lee-Joh-Nee"? Can someone tell me the spelling of her name? Thanks.

[Gwin Ru]

Posted by Kryztian (here)
[...]

One question for someone who speaks French. At 23:50 Xavier Reyes-Ayral mentions a Marian visionary who's first name is Marie but I can not make sense of the second: it is something like "Reej-Lee-Joh-Nee"? Can someone tell me the spelling of her name? Thanks.

...

Marie Julie Jahenny


Marie-Julie Jahenny Breton pronunciation:[maˈʁiːʒyˈliːʒaɛˈniː](Coyault, Blain, 12 February 1850 – La Fraudais, 4 March 1941) was a Breton woman considered by some to be a mystic and stigmatist.

[Kryztian]

Posted by Gwin Ru (here)

Marie Julie Jahenny


Marie-Julie Jahenny Breton pronunciation:[maˈʁiːʒyˈliːʒaɛˈniː](Coyault, Blain, 12 February 1850 – La Fraudais, 4 March 1941) was a Breton woman considered by some to be a mystic and stigmatist.

Thank you Gwin Ru. Yes, I remember reading about her before. She was from the town of "La Fraudais", France and after the Bishop had her stigmata investigated, he proclaimed "There was no fraud at La Fraudais."

[Kindred]

For those that are interested, here's a good overview of the Garabandal 'story' that helps to validate prior posts regarding 'The Event' and it's connection to Garabandal... 12 min long

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=a_kiVfG5C8Q

Regarding "WW3"... just remember... YOU CREATE YOUR REALITY...what you Visualize and Believe is what your Experienced Reality Will Be...

Be Careful in what you Believe.

If you want World Peace, Visualize and BELIEVE IN IT.

In Unity, Peace and LOVE

[ozmirage]

We're all victims of the world's greatest propaganda machine / ministry. How do we know this to be true? Our unsound logic and immorality.

You hear it everyday when propaganda repeats that morality is “gray” and there is no real distinction between good and evil. It shows up in entertainment, when heroes are depicted as corrupt, and villains are glorified.

Morality is Simple
Morality is simple - it is choice based on survival - dead things have no morality - and it depends on which law you follow.

In the most basic morality, that which is contrary to survival is immoral - like killing unborn fetuses. No civilization that kills its unborn is truly civilized, no matter what lame excuse is concocted.

Beyond the basic morality of survival, there are two sets of laws:
1. Law of love, and
2. Law of the jungle.

Under the law of love, harmless activity in support of one's right to life is moral / good. Harmful action is bad. Self sacrifice for others is the highest good.

Under the law of the jungle, predators are good, and prey are good to eat. Prey who fight back are bad. Sacrificing others for one’s own gain is the rule, not the exception. Self preservation is paramount.

So when we're misled to assume that there are no real moral value systems - it's code for PREDATORS telling their PREY to stop resisting and willingly cooperate in their demise.

When you are trained to ignore civilized law - the law of love - and are trained in jungle law - you are working against your greatest good. To predators, winning is everything. However, using evil to defeat evil insures that evil is victorious.

“For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?” - - - Matthew 16:26 KJV

Freedom is not a worthy goal if it means the freedom to harm others and their property.
Those who follow the law of love, and are harmless productive people, are what we define as "moral" and "law abiding".

Those who follow the law of the jungle, and who harmfully prey on others, are what we define as "immoral" and "law breakers". But they don't believe they're law breakers. It's a waste of time to appeal to their better natures. We're just chumps to them.

Choose your law carefully...

If our environment and companions in the spiritual realm are determined by our inherent vibration or essence, it makes sense to strive to be the kind of person that one would prefer to spend eternity with.

[Mike Gorman]

Posted by Kindred (here)
For those that are interested, here's a good overview of the Garabandal 'story' that helps to validate prior posts regarding 'The Event' and it's connection to Garabandal... 12 min long

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=a_kiVfG5C8Q

Regarding "WW3"... just remember... YOU CREATE YOUR REALITY...what you Visualize and Believe is what your Experienced Reality Will Be...

Be Careful in what you Believe.

If you want World Peace, Visualize and BELIEVE IN IT.
-
In Unity, Peace and LOVE

Why do these pundits always claim that Russia's special military project was 'unprovoked'? This was massively provoked by the hostility and fear of USA/UK and of course as a result NATO- has been very active in setting up Bio-warfare labs, military projects of every stripe, let us not forget the enormous underground covert project at Mariupol with myriad western scientists and military types residing there - The use of Ukraine as a means to goad, and provoke Russia is indisputable, it is plain wrong to suggest Russia behaved badly here, the West behaved appallingly!

[Kindred]

Here's a Very interesting article on a solar system phenomena that is to take place soon. I feel that it Too is associated with the overarching 'influence' of our 'star brethren'... The coming solar eclipse.

On April 8th, The Great American Eclipse Of 2024 Will Cross Over 7 U.S. Locations Named “Ninevah”

https://citizenwatchreport.com/on-ap...named-ninevah/
From the article:

Now the second Great American Eclipse is almost here, and the path of that eclipse will cross over seven U.S. locations named “Ninevah”…

-Nineveh, Texas

-Nineveh, Missouri

-Nineveh, Indiana

-Nineveh, Ohio

-Nineveh, Pennsylvania

-Nineveh, Virginia

-Nineveh, New York

I'll note that I lived/worked in upstate NY for about 14 years... and my supervisor was a resident of Nineveh his entire life, and still resides there. I, myself, lived in the town of Vestal.... and there are aspects of my being that are directly related to that name...

The final few sentences of Thiaoouba Prophecy, chapter 13 are thus:

Michel, abductee) "Many people believe in the influence of the stars, and follow the signs of the Zodiac. What do you think of that?"
Michel's mentor, Thao: "to this, Thao didn't reply, but she smiled."

In Unity, Peace and LOVE