The 'Great Reset'

[Eva2]

'ER PHYSICIAN WARNS THE PUBLIC THAT THE BAIT & SWITCH IS COMING.'

https://www.bitchute.com/video/274m0...l5rgYvL_hIGR6Y

[ExomatrixTV]

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• Great Reset? Putin Says, “Not So Fast”

• Dutch 🇳🇱 people can also read this

Did you happen to catch the most important political speech of the last six years?

It would have been easy to miss given everything going on. In fact, I almost did, and this speech sits at the intersection of nearly all of my areas of intense study.

The annual World Economic Forum took place last week via teleconference, what I’m calling Virtual Davos, and at this year’s event, of course, the signature topic was their project called the Great Reset.

But if the WEF was so intent on presenting the best face for the Great Reset to the world it wouldn’t have invited either Chinese Premier Xi Jinping or, more importantly, Russian President Vladimir Putin.

And it was Putin’s speech that brought down the house of cards that is the agenda of the WEF.

The last time someone walked into a major international forum and issued such a scathing critique of the current geopolitical landscape was Putin’s speech to the United Nations on September 29th, 2015, two days before he sent a small contingency of Russian air support to Syria.

There he excoriated not only the U.N. by name but most importantly the U.S. and its NATO allies by inference asking the most salient question, “Do you understand what you have done?” having unleashed chaos in an already chaotic part of the world?
As important as that speech was it was Putin’s actions after that which defined the current era of geopolitical chess across the Eurasian continent. Syria became the nexus around which the resistance to the “ISIS is invincible” narrative unraveled
And the mystery of who was behind ISIS, namely the Obama administration, was revealed to anyone paying attention.

President Trump may have taken credit for beating ISIS, but it was mostly Putin and Russia’s forces retaking the Western part of Syria which allowed that to happen, while our globalist generals, like James Mattis, did as much damage to Syria itself and as little to ISIS as possible, hoping to use them again another day.

And regardless of whether you agree or disagree with the U.S.’s policy in Syria, which I most definitely do not, it is hard to argue that Russia’s intervention there fundamentally changed the regional politics and conflicts for the foreseeable future.
It was the beginning of the voluntary disconnection of China, Russia and Iran from the West.

For standing athwart U.S. and European designs on consolidating power in the Middle East, Russia has been vilified in the West in ways that make the indoctrination I received as a kid growing up in the Cold War look like vacation advertisements for spending the summer in Crimea.

But it is that strength of purpose and character that has defined Putin’s two decades in power. He’s done wonders in rebuilding Russia.

He’s made many mistakes, mostly by first trusting American Presidents and second by underestimating just how arrogant and rapacious the leadership in Europe is.
That said, he’s now reached his limit, especially with Europe, and he’s set a firmly independent path for Russia regardless of the short-term costs.

And that’s why his speech at the World Economic Forum was so important.
Putin hadn’t spoken there for nearly a decade. In a time when WEF-controlled puppets dominate positions of power in Europe, the U.K., Canada and now the U.S., Putin walked into Virtual Davos and dumped his coffee on the carpet.

In terms I can only describe as unfailingly polite, Putin told Klaus Schwab and the WEF that their entire idea of the Great Reset is not only doomed to failure but runs counter to everything modern leadership should be pursuing.

• Putin literally laughed at the idea of the "Fourth Industrial Revolution" – Schwab’s idea of a planned society through A.I., robots and the merging of man and machine.

He flat-out told them their policies driving the middle class to the brink of extinction over the COVID-19 pandemic will further increase social and political unrest while also ensuring wealth inequality gets worse.

Putin’s no flower-throwing libertarian or anything, but his critique of the hyper-financialized post-Soviet era is accurate.

The era dominated by central banking and the continued merging of state and corporate powers has increased wealth inequality across the U.S. and Europe, benefiting millions while extracting the wealth of billions.

• Listening to Putin was like listening to a cross between Pat Buchanan and the late Walter Williams.

According to him the neoliberal ideal of “invite the world/invade the world” has destroyed the cultural ties within countries while hollowing out their economic prospects. Putin criticized zero-bound interest rates, QE, tariffs and sanctions as political weapons.

But the targets of those weapons, while nominally pointed at his Russia, were really the West’s own engines of vitality, as the middle classes have seen their wages stagnate, and access to education, medical care, and the courts to redress grievances fall dramatically.

Russia is a country on the rise, so is China. Once their ties are embedded deeply enough to stabilize its economy, so too will Iran rise.

Together they will lead the central Asian landmass out of the nineteenth-century quagmire that exists thanks to British and American intervention in the region. Putin’s speech made it clear that Russia is committed to the process of finding solutions to all people benefiting from the future, not just a few thousand holier-than-thou oligarchs in Europe.

In a less confrontational address, Chairman Xi said the same thing. He gave lip service, like Putin, to climate change and carbon neutrality, focusing instead on pollution and sustainability.

Together they basically told the WEF to stuff the Great Reset back into the hole in which it was conceived.

I’ve followed Putin closely for nearly a decade now. I got the feeling that if he was speaking to a college-level political science class and not a convocation of some of the most powerful people in the world he would have laughed in their faces.
But, unfortunately, he understands better than any of us having been the object of their aggression for so long, he had to treat them seriously as their grasp of reality and connectedness to the people they ruled was nearly severed.

At the end of his planned remarks, Klaus Schwab asked Putin about Russia’s troubled relationship with Europe and could it be fixed. Putin pulled no punches.

If we can rise above these problems of the past and get rid of these phobias, then we will certainly enjoy a positive stage in our relations.
We are ready for this, we want this, and we will strive to make this happen. But love is impossible if it is declared only by one side. It must be mutual.

I don’t get the sense from anything I’ve seen from the Biden Administration or the European Commission in Brussels that anyone heard a word he said.

This piece is original for Daily Liberty News…and is reprinted with permission
Join My Patreon if you don’t want to be forcibly Reset

• Dutch 🇳🇱 people can also read this

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• The UN wants THESE 6 policies from The Great Reset executed ASAP:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Pvvv_rxLL-Y

[onawah]

Rare Video of 'Brave New World'
Aldous Huxley From 63 Years Ago
by Dr. Joseph Mercola
February 20, 2021
https://articles.mercola.com/sites/a...rid=1088745401

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=alasBxZsb40

"STORY AT-A-GLANCE
Aldous Huxley wrote “Brave New World,” a nightmarish vision of a future society known as the “World State,” ruled by science and efficiency, where emotions and individuality have been eradicated and personal relationships are few
When Huxley wrote the book, optimism about technological advancements were high and there was widespread belief that technology would solve many of the world’s problems. “Brave New World” demonstrates the naiveté of such hopes by showing what can happen when technology is taken to its extreme
Huxley predicted the technological capability to bypass reason and manipulate behavior through subliminal means. Today, social media platforms and search engines use sophisticated artificial intelligence algorithms to push certain kinds of information in front of us
Huxley’s ideas appear to have influenced the technocracy’s planning. The World Economic Forum’s 2030 agenda includes the strangely ominous dictum that “you will own nothing and be happy”
Huxley argues that in order to create the dystopian future presented in his book, you have to centralize wealth, power and control. Hence, the way to protect against it is to insist on decentralization
The video above features a 1958 interview of Aldous Huxley with Mike Wallace. It really is a great glimpse from the past. Wallace was smoking on the set, but that was natural back then, and Rod Serling, who produced the “Twilight Zone,” did the same. Interestingly, they both developed lung cancer.

You might recall that Huxley wrote the classic novel “Brave New World,” in which he presents a dystopian vision of a future society known as the “World State,” a society ruled by science and efficiency, where emotions and individuality have been eradicated and personal relationships are few.

Children are cloned and bred in “hatcheries,” where they are conditioned for their role in society from an early age. There are no mothers and fathers as natural procreation is outlawed. There are no family units.

Embryos are sorted and given hormonal treatments based on their destined societal classification, which from highest to lowest are Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta and Epsilon. The Alphas are bred and conditioned to be leaders while the Epsilons are designed for menial labor, free of higher intellectual capacities.

At the time Huxley wrote the book in 1931 (it was published the year after), optimism about technological advancements were high and there was widespread belief that technology would solve many of the world’s problems. “Brave New World” demonstrates the naiveté of such hopes by showing what can happen when technocracy is taken to its extreme.

Huxley believed his world of horror was right around the corner and, today, just shy of 60 years later, we’re starting to see Huxley’s “World State” closing in around us in the form of the Fourth Industrial Revolution’s transhumanist agenda and the Great Reset, designed to trap us inside a net of constant surveillance and external control.

Enemies of Freedom
Huxley also penned a series of essays called “Enemies of Freedom,” which he discusses in the featured interview. The series outlines “impersonal forces” that are “pushing in the direction of progressively less freedom,” and “technological devices” that can be used to accelerate the process by imposing ever greater control of the population.

Huxley points out that as technology becomes more complex and complicated, it becomes increasingly necessary to form more elaborate hierarchal organizations to manage it all. Technology also allows for more effective propaganda machines that can be managed through those same control hierarchies.

Huxley cites the success of Hitler, noting that aside from Hitler’s effective use of terror and brute force, “he also used a very efficient form of propaganda. He had the radio, which he used to the fullest extent, and was able to impose his will on an immense mass of people.”

With the advent of television, Huxley foresaw how an authoritarian leadership could become a source of “a one-pointed drumming” of a single idea, effectively brainwashing the public.

Beyond that, Huxley predicted the technological capability to “bypass the rational side of man” and manipulate behavior by influencing people on a subconscious level. This is precisely what we’re faced with today.

Google, but also to a large extent Facebook, has been collecting data on you for nearly two decades. They have created massive server farms that are capable of analyzing this data with deep learning and artificial intelligence software to mine information and generate incredibly precise details on just what type of propaganda and narrative is required to surreptitiously manipulate you into the behavior they are seeking.

Huxley also points out the dangers inherent in advertising, especially as it pertains to marketing of political ideas and ideologies:

“Democracy depends on the individual voter making an intelligent and rational choice for what he regards as his enlightened self-interest in any given circumstance but …

There are particular purposes for selling goods, and [what] the dictatorial propagandists are doing is to try to bypass the rational side of men and to appeal directly to these unconscious forces below the surface so that you are in a way making nonsense of the whole democratic procedure, which is based on conscious choice or on rational ground …

Children are quite clearly much more suggestible than the average grownup and, again, suppose that for one reason or another all the propaganda was in the hands of one or very few agencies, you would have an extraordinarily powerful force playing on these children who are going to grow up and be adults …

You can read in the trade journal the most critical accounts of how necessary it is to get hold of the children, because then they will be loyal brand buyers later on. Translate this into political terms, the dictator says they will be loyal ideology buyers when they’re grown up.”Decentralization Protects Freedom; Centralization Robs It
Huxley argues that in order to create the dystopian future presented in his book, you have to centralize wealth, power and control. Hence, the way to protect against it is to insist on decentralization. It’s surprising that even 60 years ago Huxley was wise enough to understand this profoundly important principle.

I believe that it is the decentralization of the internet that is required to prevent censorship and manipulation in the future. This means that websites and platforms are not stored in one central place that can easily be controlled and manipulated but, rather, widely distributed to thousands, if not millions, of computers all over the world. It would work because if there is no central storage it can’t be removed.

Decentralized platforms allow the majority of power to reside with the individual. Technologies that can be easily misused to control the public narrative must also remain largely decentralized, so that no one person or agency ends up with too much power to manipulate and influence the public. Our modern-day social media monopolies are a perfect example of what Huxley warned us about.

The same goes for economic institutions too. Today, we can see how the role of the central bank (in the U.S. known as the Federal Reserve) — a privately-owned entity with the power to break entire countries apart for profit — is forcing us toward a new global economic system that will impoverish and quite literally enslave everyone, with the exception of the technocratic social bankers themselves and their globalist allies.

Our Orwellian Present
A contemporary and student of Huxley was George Orwell (real name Eric Blair1), who wrote another dystopian classic — “1984” — published in 1949. The two books — “1984” and “Brave New World” — share the commonality that they both depict a future devoid of the very things that we associate with having a healthy, free, creative, purposeful and enjoyable life.

In “1984,” the context is a society where an all-knowing, all-seeing “Big Brother” rules with an iron fist. Citizens are under constant watch. Privacy is nonexistent, and language is twisted to justify and glorify oppression.

Some of the spectacles of 2020 could have easily been ripped straight out of the pages of “1984,” as riots were described by cheery news anchors as “mostly peaceful protests,” even as city blocks were engulfed in flames behind them and people were bleeding to death in the streets. For those familiar with the book, such scenes were difficult to watch without being reminded of 1984s “double-think.”

Orwell Versus Huxley
There are differences between the two works, however. While Orwell foresees people being forcefully enslaved by an external agency, and kept in that state by the same, Huxley’s vision is one in which people have been so thoroughly conditioned that they come to love their servitude. At that point, no external authoritarian ruler is actually required.

If you think about it, I’m sure you will agree that this is clearly the most efficient strategy to take control of the population. Moore’s law and the exponential improvement in computer processing capacity has exponentially accelerated the global elites’ ability to precisely identify how to implement peaceful control that will have the majority virtually begging for tyranny.

In Huxley’s “Brave New World,” people have fallen in love with the very technologies that prevent them from thinking and acting of their free will, so the enslaved maintain their own control structure.

As noted by Neil Postman in his book, “Amusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the Age of Show Business,” in which he compares and contrasts the futures presented by Huxley and Orwell:

“What Orwell feared were those who would ban books. What Huxley feared was that there would be no reason to ban a book, for there would be no one who wanted to read one. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism.

Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy.

As Huxley remarked in ‘Brave New World Revisited,’ the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny ‘failed to take into account man’s almost infinite appetite for distractions.’

In ‘1984,’ Huxley added, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In ‘Brave New World,’ they are controlled by inflicting pleasure. In short, Orwell feared that what we hate will ruin us. Huxley feared that what we love will ruin us.”

The Promise of the Great Reset


Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/ByoitFsTgnVI


One can argue about who predicted the future best, Orwell or Huxley, but in the final analysis, I think we’re looking at a mixture of both, although it seems obvious to me that Huxley was more prescient and he was actually Orwell’s mentor. Huxley’s concerns are far more serious as the programming is essentially silent, and it is patently evident that the technocrats have been highly successful in implementing this strategy in the past year.2

That said, we’re facing both the threat of externally imposed authoritarianism and control predicted by Orwell, and the subversive, subliminal programming through mindless entertainment and the lure of convenience proposed by Huxley.

Undoubtedly, the combination is a powerful one, and likely far more effective than either control strategy by itself. I’ve already touched on how Orwell’s work is playing out in the real world through the “double-think” mental gymnastics we get from the controlled, tightly centralized mainstream media these days.

For an example of how Huxley’s ideas have influenced the technocracy’s planning, look no further than the globalists’ call to “build back better” (video above) and the World Economic Forum’s 2030 agenda (below), which includes the strangely ominous dictum that you will own nothing and be happy.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lBBxWtKKQiA

The unstated implication is that the world’s resources will be owned and controlled by the technocratic elite, and you’ll have to pay for the temporary use of absolutely everything. Nothing will actually belong to you. All items and resources are to be used by the collective, while actual ownership is restricted to an upper stratum of social class.

Just how will this imposed serfdom make you happy? Again, the unstated implication is that lack of ownership is a marvelous convenience. Rent a pot and then return it. You don’t need storage space! Imagine the freedom! They even promise the convenience of automatic drone delivery straight to your door.

Artificial intelligence — which is siphoning your data about every aspect of your existence through nearly every piece of technology and appliance you own — will run your life, predicting your every mood and desire, catering to your every whim. Ah, the luxury of not having to make any decisions!

Life of man is ultimately impossible without a considerable measure of individual freedom. ~ Aldous Huxley
This is the mindset they’re trying to program into you, and for most, it appears to be working. For others who can see the propaganda for what it is, these promises look and feel like proverbial mouse traps. Once you bite the cheese, you’ll be stuck, robbed of your freedom forevermore. And, as Huxley told Wallace, individual freedom is really a prerequisite for a genuinely productive society:

“Life of man is ultimately impossible without a considerable measure of individual freedom. Initiative and creativity — all these things that we value, and I think value properly, are impossible without a large measure of freedom.”

When Wallace challenges Huxley on this by pointing out that the Soviet Union was successfully developing both militarily and artistically, despite being a tightly controlled regime, Huxley counters by saying that those doing that creative work, especially scientists, were also granted far greater personal freedom and prosperity than everyone else.

As long as they kept their noses out of politics, they were brought into the upper echelon and given a great deal of freedom, and without this freedom, they would not have been able to be as creative and inventive, Huxley says.

The Threat of the New Normal
This anti-human “new normal” that world leaders are now urging us to accept and embrace is the trap of all traps. Unless your most cherished dream is to lie in bed for the rest of your life, your body atrophying away, with a pair of VR goggles permanently strapped to your face, you must resist and oppose the “new normal” every day going forward.

As noted by Spiked editor Brendan O’Neill in his February 5, 2021, article,3 while the first lockdown was marked by a sense of camaraderie and the promise of it being a temporary measure that we can get through if we just address the problem together, by the third round, all forms of social connection have vanished, as has the anticipation of a return to normality.

“In the first lockdown, the dream of normality was what kept people going; it was actively encouraged by some politicians and even some in the doom-laden media. This time, dreams of normality are treated as ‘dysfunction’, as a species of ‘denial,’” O’Neill writes.

Make no mistake. The media’s rebuke of a return to normalcy as a nonsensical piped ream is dangerous propaganda territory. The reality is we could easily open everything back up and go back to business as usual, and nothing out of the ordinary, in terms of sickness and death, would occur.

People die every year. It’s an inevitable reality of life and, up until the last two weeks of 2020, there actually were no greater number of deaths recorded than the year prior, and the year prior to that, and the one before that.4

While new numbers released by the CDC indicate that 2020’s final two weeks may have pushed the total deaths beyond 2019’s (final data won’t be available for months),5 COVID-19 simply isn’t as lethal as initially suspected. It primarily kills the elderly and the chronically ill — what’s most interesting is that suicide deaths among teens went up dramatically as lockdowns and school closings dragged on.6,7

What’s more, we now have effective prophylactics and treatments that ensure the loss of life due to COVID-19 can be radically minimized. Yet, our leaders don’t want you to think in those terms. They want you to remain fearful because they have a deep appreciation of the value of fear in catalyzing the precise type of capitulation and surrender they need in order to implement the Great Reset.

Tragically, many citizens have so embraced the fear culture, they don’t even need an authoritarian figure to tell them to comply with rules that have no medical benefit anymore. They’ll happily act as the designated COVID police, making sure everyone around them complies.

Hell hath no fury like one caught in the unsound belief that they will die if you don’t wear a mask. This is no way to live. It’s not sane and it’s not healthy, and the prophetic works of Huxley and Orwell illustrate where it will all end if we don’t push back.

Never Surrender to the New Normal
In closing, I’d like you to ponder some portions from O’Neill’s article, in which he warns us about the threat posed by the culture of fear itself, which is just as dangerous and damaging as any virus:8

“[Spiked] argued that Covid-19 … would be refracted through the culture of fear, potentially harming our ability to understand and deal with this novel danger. This has come to pass. The shift from paying lip service to social solidarity to encouraging the populace to think of itself as diseased represents a victory for the degraded view of humanity gifted to us by the culture of fear.

The government’s early move from encouraging people to take responsibility for limiting their social interactions to using older methods of terror to ensure compliance with lockdown measures confirmed the culture of fear’s reduction of people from citizens to be engaged with to problems to be managed.

The failure to sustain the education of the next generation spoke to the exhaustion of bourgeois confidence, of the state itself, that underpins the culture of fear.

And the current threat of a New Normal — of a forever post-pandemic dystopia of distanced, masked pseudo-interaction — demonstrates that our future will be shaped at least in part by the ideologies and forces of the culture of fear …

Yes, the New Normal being talked up by the political and cultural elites will partially be informed by the experience of Covid-19 and the necessity of being prepared for a future virus. But it will also be shaped by … the culture of fear and its attendant anti-human, anti-progress ideologies ...

Soon the practical task of minimizing and managing the impact of Covid-19 will have been largely completed, leaving us with the far larger humanist task of combating this culture and making the case for a freer, more dynamic, dazzling future of growth, knowledge and engagement.

Those who underestimate the culture of fear will be ill-prepared for these future battles. They will have a tendency to surrender to the New Normal. The rest of us should stand firm, even in the face of smears and willful misrepresentations, and continue to recognize and confront the real and debilitating consequences that fear has on everyday life and on humanity’s future.”
Sources and References
1 History George Orwell
2 Think Theology May 4, 2012
3, 8 Spiked February 5, 2021
4 CDC December 22, 2020
5 USA Today January 8, 2021
6 WHIO 7 February 10, 2021
7 The Washington Post November 23, 2020

[kfm27917]

Here are some interesting Davos items by President Putin:

https://www.sott.net/article/449063-...he-Davos-elite
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/presiden...scripts/page/2

[ExomatrixTV]

• India Rejects Bill Gates The Great Reset

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=RLN0w9eaqYg

[Matthew]

"Lockdowns are quietly improving cities around the world" - Klaus Schwab

Disclose.tv
@disclosetv
NEW - Klaus Schwab's World Economic Forum (WEF) tweeted yesterday that "Lockdowns are quietly improving cities around the world," accompanied by a video showing deserted streets, empty factories, and grounded planes. After backlash, they deleted it. Copy:

[ExomatrixTV]

DAVOS Group Takes Credit For Lockdowns/Global Collapse

• Klaus Schwab Caught In Secret Sith Lord Initiation Ceremony:

[ExomatrixTV]

Sky News Australia, February 28, 2021

• Rowan Dean says there is no “Secret Agenda” about World Economic Forum’s Great Reset - they are shouting it from the rafters.
• “This is the plan by the World Economic Forum to encourage government…

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/vHE1C4MWN5Ck

source

• "New Normal" for "The Great Reset"

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/IVPJZfPV9GZH

source

[ExomatrixTV]

• screen-snap-shot from here

• Globalist Technocrats Poised to Press the Great Reset Button

• Episode 387 – Your Guide to The Great Reset

[ExomatrixTV]

• 8 Predictions For 2030-World Economic Forum. The Future Isn’t Looking Good:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=MLb3eRdd4OU

[ExomatrixTV]

A skeptical look at the ‘great reset’: a technocratic agenda that waited years for a global crisis to exploit

How the ‘great reset’ ideology of un-elected bureaucrats would steer society towards massive surveillance & control: perspective

• Klaus Schwab, Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum

In the face of a global pandemic, an un-elected body of global bureaucrats based in Davos, Switzerland has asked the world to trust its vision of a technocratic “great reset,” knowing full well the public would never go for such a request had it not been for the golden opportunity they’d all been waiting for.

When the head of the World Economic Forum (WEF), Klaus Schwab, announced in June that “Now is the time for a great reset,” it wasn’t the first time he called for it.
In fact, he called on the WEF to start the great reset over five years ago (see video below), but this year he’s saying that COVID-19 is the most urgent reason to restructure all of society and the global economy.

The great reset agenda was already in place long before the coronavirus pandemic, and the WEF was just waiting for a crisis to exploit it.

Prior to this year, implementing worldwide lockdowns that destroy businesses, wreck the economy, and leave people destitute and stripped of their constitutional rights while trying to enact invasive contact tracing, immunity passports, and otherwise massive bio-electronic surveillance apparatuses would never have been accepted by the citizens of a free society

The so-called great reset is an old ideology touted for decades by globalists like Henry Kissinger, who opined in 2014, “Never before has a new world order had to be assembled from so many different perceptions, or on so global a scale.”
The great reset is the proposed mechanism for setting in motion a new global order, but it wouldn’t be possible to bring forth such a bold plan without a global crisis, be it manufactured or of unfortunate happenstance, that shocks society to its core.

“The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world to create a healthier, more equitable, and more prosperous future” — Klaus Schwab, WEF

In this story, I will attempt to dissect:

• What types of invasive surveillance technologies will be required by the great reset
• Why the great reset is being re-branded and pushed in 2020
• How the Davos crowd is trying to sell the great reset Utopia
• Who will be asked to give up their privacy for the "common good"
• When humans become hackable
• Where you have the power to choose

With the arrival of the coronavirus pandemic, the WEF has the perfect excuse to quickly enact its vision for steering society towards a more invasive and intrusive, technocratic future in the name of serving the "common good".

The un-elected architects of the great reset envision a Utopian world of inclusivity, equality, and sustainability that will require trust in emerging technologies like A.I., 5G, Blockchain, and robotics, in order to usher in their golden dawn.



WEF Great Reset Agenda Great Reset Will Require Trust in Invasive Surveillance Tech: WEF Promotes Health Passports & Contact Tracing

In order to bring about the great reset, it will require trust in the technology, and to be more specific, the WEF would like to have greater trust in “crisis-relevant tech,” which includes developing digital health passports and contact tracing, under a new form of internet governance.

“The use of digital technology during the COVID-19 crisis offers clear lessons […] Target mistrust broadly to enable specific crisis-relevant tech” — Daniel Dobrygowski, WEF

“The Great Reset will require new institutions and business models, and new digital technologies to build them,” wrote the WEF Head of Corporate Governance and Trust, Daniel Dobrygowski, in a blog post. “The necessary collaboration, however, is only possible if we solve the digital trust problem,” he added.

According to the Dobrygowski, “The use of digital technology during the COVID-19 crisis offers clear lessons,” one of those being, “Target mistrust broadly to enable specific crisis-relevant tech.”

The WEF openly supports the development of so-called “crisis-relevant tech” as evidenced by its backing the development of health passports, which act as digital records of your health status to determine whether or not you are free to travel or even go outside.

Earlier this year the WEF announced it was supporting the development and launch of CommonPass — a platform whose mission is “to develop and launch a standard global model to enable people to securely document and present their COVID-19 status (either as test results or an eventual vaccination status) to facilitate international travel and border crossing while keeping their health information private.”

“Contact tracing apps can be powerful weapons against the virus – but they can also be tools for state surveillance” — WEF report

The WEF also lent its support to another health passport initiative called CovidPass, which was built by one of the WEF’s own “Young Global Leaders,” Mustapha Mokass, who used to be an advisor at the World Bank.


CovidPass “uses blockchain technology to store encrypted data from individual blood tests, allowing users to prove that they have tested negative for COVID-19.”
In supporting both CommonPass and CovidPass, the Davos elite have made it clear they want “crisis-relevant tech” like health passports to be part of the great reset solution.

Ask yourself, would the idea of being forced to electronically prove your current health status in order to travel or even leave your own home have been acceptable 10 months ago?

• Why is this all happening now?

The die was cast years ago, but only now do the Davos elite see a shrinking, yet golden opportunity, to create a new world order out of the coronavirus chaos.

• COVID Presents a ‘Shrinking, Golden Opportunity’, Great Reset Is Not a Response to the Coronavirus

In June Prince Charles praised the great reset agenda for its potential to “make people more receptive to big visions of change” after having suffered through “unprecedented schockwaves.”
“We have a golden opportunity to seize something good from this crisis — its unprecedented shockwaves may well make people more receptive to big visions of change,” the prince told the WEF.

Would the idea of being forced to electronically prove your current health status in order to travel or even leave your own home have been acceptable 10 months ago?

Prince Charles may have let on more than he cared to share, or thought you would notice. Again, he’s telling you that the great reset was always the plan. COVID-19 is the excuse.
In other words, the coronavirus crisis presents a golden opportunity for the global establishment to further its agenda upon a frightful and angry population that has been so beaten down by the pandemic and subsequent lockdowns that they will have become more susceptible to giving over their freedoms to the idea of greater centralized power and control.
Prince Charles went on, “As we move from rescue to recovery, we have a unique but rapidly shrinking window of opportunity to learn lessons and reset ourselves on a more sustainable path. It is an opportunity we have never had before and may never have again.”

“We have a golden opportunity to seize something good from this crisis — its unprecedented shockwaves may well make people more receptive to big visions of change” — Prince Charles

The British royal’s words echo those of WEF Director Schwab, who said, “The pandemic represents a rare but narrow window of opportunity to reflect, reimagine, and reset our world to create a healthier, more equitable, and more prosperous future.”
Again, why is the window of opportunity so narrow? Could the seeds of their grand strategy only flower while the world was distracted and divided amidst the chaos?

• The Lure of Utopia Has Many Hooks: Giving Up Privacy & Freedom for the "Common Good"

Prior to this year, implementing worldwide lockdowns that destroy businesses, wreck the economy, and leave people destitute and stripped of their constitutional rights while trying to enact invasive contact tracing, immunity passports, and otherwise massive bio-electronic surveillance apparatuses would never have been accepted by the citizens of a free society.
But the coronavirus pandemic has opened a “narrow window” for a “golden opportunity,” and once this crisis is over, the Davos club fears that the window may be shut forever.
The WEF admits in its own contact tracing governance framework that “Contact tracing apps can be powerful weapons against the virus – but they can also be tools for state surveillance.”
Yet, the WEF believes that people should balance certain freedoms to serve the "common good". It is a global vision without a clear end, and it is one that flies in the face of constitutional republics that protect certain unalienable rights.

“This new mindset would balance concerns over privacy and other issues with the potential to create value and improve lives” — WEF report

According to the WEF framework, enacting contact tracing technology would “not be easy and will require a new social consensus that embraces the use of technology to resolve problems for the good of all.”
Additionally, “This new mindset would balance concerns over privacy and other issues with the potential to create value and improve lives.”
In order to enact invasive technologies upon the population, citizens of the world will have to realize that it’s for the greater good and that they should change their mindsets to be less concerned about “privacy and other issues” and more excited about “the potential to create value and improve lives.”

The great reset “will require stronger and more effective governments […] and it will demand private-sector engagement every step of the way” — Klaus Schwab, WEF

Just about every proponent of contact tracing and health passports, including the WEF, all declare that technology should be used and governed ethically, but you hardly see any mention of winning the consent of the people.
Instead, they lobby stakeholders and policymakers to carry the torch in imparting the global vision from the top of the capstone and on-down.

“As we move from rescue to recovery, we have a unique but rapidly shrinking window of opportunity to learn lessons and reset ourselves on a more sustainable path. It is an opportunity we have never had before and may never have again” — Prince Charles

If the coronavirus were to disappear from the earth today, would the WEF have to wait for a new global crisis, or would it push-on with the same reset agenda, regardless?
According to the WEF director, the great reset “will require stronger and more effective governments […] and it will demand private-sector engagement every step of the way.”
“The world must act jointly and swiftly to revamp all aspects of our societies and economies, from education to social contracts and working conditions,” he added. “We must build entirely new foundations for our economic and social systems.”
In creating order out of the coronavirus chaos, the great reset promises to bring about “a more secure, more equal, and more stable world.”
Is that how they plan to win our trust? By promising us a Utopia if we just go along with it?

• Bio-Electronic Surveillance and Hackable Humans

We haven’t even gotten into how the great reset would affect the world’s money system and the role of blockchain and digital payments, but when you look at digital health passports and contact tracing apps, you are looking at sophisticated form of bio-electronic surveillance that the world has never been seen before.

“We are no longer mysterious souls; we are now hackable animals” — Yuval Harari, WEF

When you combine biological data with advanced computing power, what you get is the ability to hack humans.
Speaking in Davos over the past few years, historian Yuval Harari has stated that “organisms are algorithms” and that “new technologies will soon give some corporations and governments the ability to hack human beings.”

• source

[ExomatrixTV]

• The Great Dystopian Reset in 5 minutes

Source: https://www.bitchute.com/video/BYImznU6S0CL

source

... for Full HD 1920x1080p click on me

<iframe src="https://brandnewtube.com/embed/HKlcwr8P9ZRJW3J" frameborder="0" width="700" height="400" allowfullscreen></iframe>

• source

[Bluegreen]

* Sheila Aliens *

World Economic Forum seeks World Domination in "Great Reset" Video

"The wealthiest & most powerful people on the planet want Earth to be nice & tidy and rid of the majority of us lowly plebs. They want the place for themselves and they dictate their demands from on high in the Swiss Alps in Davos, Switzerland. So tone deaf. They also think if they jump out ahead of the creepy stuff, like by putting an ironic amount of illuminati/NWO symbolism and acknowledgement in their videos, that they will be seen as "with it" and definitely not Evil."

Published 2nd February 2021 (18:56) – includes WEF video

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=G3KAl9g6l5w

[ExomatrixTV]

• You’ll Own Nothing and Be Happy!? - The Great Reset

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bEQcyIGH_vQ

[onawah]

Rosa Koire, The GREATER Reset, Transcript & Video
3/1/21
https://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/the...ra-rosa-koire/

From Alexandra Bruce of Forbidden Knowledge:

"I've been getting some pushback whenever I publish stories about China, so I want to make my position very clear. I am certainly not referring to the Chinese people and I am not even referring to just the Chinese Communist Party, as the latter would NEVER have been able to accomplish what they have without the long term planning and rigging of the world by the Globalists and their treasonous American agents, who sold out their country for personal gain.

Lee Smith calls this elite that forms the nexus of public and private sector interests the "China Class", in the best article I've ever read on this topic of topics:

"And because it was true that China was the source of the China Class’ power, the novel coronavirus coming out of Wuhan became the platform for its coup de grace.

So Americans became prey to an anti-democratic elite that used the coronavirus to demoralize them; lay waste to small businesses; leave them vulnerable to rioters who are free to steal, burn, and kill; keep their children from school and the dying from the last embrace of their loved ones; and desecrate American history, culture, and society; and defame the country as systemically racist in order to furnish the predicate for why ordinary Americans in fact deserved the hell that the elite’s private and public sector proxies had already prepared for them.

For nearly a year, American officials have purposefully laid waste to our economy and society for the sole purpose of arrogating more power to themselves while the Chinese economy has gained on America’s. China’s lockdowns had nothing to do with the difference in outcomes. Lockdowns are not public health measures to reduce the spread of a virus.

They are political instruments...

That Democratic officials intentionally destroyed lives and ended thousands of them by sending the ill to infect the elderly in nursing homes is irrelevant to [them]. The job was to boost coronavirus casualties in order to defeat Trump and they succeeded.

I have said numerous times, "Communist China is a cut-out of the Globalist cabal" but Martin Geddes articulated it better than I in an email he sent to his followers the other day:
"The Chinese Communist Party is the front through which the globalist totalitarian banking aristocracy has been operating its plan to gain complete control of this planet."

Get it? Think about that and think about the Unconstitutional mass-surveillance being implemented, the Internet of Things, the Smart Grid and Smart Cities that have been in development for the past 20 years and think of the world of vaccine passports and social credit that the banksters are getting ready to deploy. All of this is really Agenda 21, which Rosa Koire describes thus:

"UN Agenda 21 Sustainable Development is the comprehensive blueprint. It's the "action plan", as the UN calls it, to inventory and control all land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, energy, education, transportation, information and all human beings in the world. It's an inventory and control plan."

The Internet of Things seeks to create a complete digital facsimile of everything on the planet; to create a digital shadow of you, me, everyone and everything. Already, there is a digital strawman of you and allegedly, the algorithms "know" you better than you know yourself and can predict your next steps.

To fully execute their plan, the Globalists must end the US Constitutional Republic and impose the China model worldwide. Given the complete disintegration of the rule of law that we've witnessed in recent months and how all levels of our government are in thrall to blackmail and bribery – as exemplified by our Cadaver-in-Chief – it appears that they've already won.

Our government and the institutions we were supposed to trust have been corrupted so completely by the Globalists that they've devolved from mere kleptocracies into ministries of mass-genocide.

People like Andrew Cuomo and Gretchen Whitmer, whose illegal lockdowns have normalized autocracy have also served to discredit the American system, in the eyes of its citizens. This is exactly what the Globalists wanted and these governors are useful idiots.

The debt, the Endless Wars, the managed decline that we've seen for decades was always about taking out the US and moving the center of power to China.

The horrendous rolling coup and information warfare that we've lived with since the beginning of Trump presidency was all about how he was awakening us to them."

***

THE GREATER RESET ACTIVATION: THE AGORA – ROSA KOIRE
TRANSCRIPT
2/28/21

"In this time of stress and anger and fear and separation and limitation, we need to break out of the paralysis and the panic that's imposed on us and break into a set of positive workable solutions that could bring us closer together, in respect and love.

So, I know that's what we're all excited to be participating in today it's the declaration of taking back control of our life's direction...

My role today is to set the stage for the Greater Reset, by looking at the World Economic Forum's Great Reset, the Fourth Industrial Revolution, the UN Agenda 2030 and of course, the larger plan, within which all of this revolves, which is United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development, where we can agree that we're witnessing the great purge.

It's the great concentration of wealth and power; the great reveal of willing dictators; the great reallocation of resources; the great digital revolution of the surveillance state. This is the agenda for the 21st century and beyond. It's the great rehash of the old plan, so I'm going to start there.

UN Agenda 21 Sustainable Development is the comprehensive blueprint. It's the "action plan", as the UN calls it, to inventory and control all land, water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, energy, education, transportation, information and all human beings in the world. It's an inventory and control plan.

This is the agenda for the 21st century. It's a blueprint for 100 years and there are milestones at 2020, 2030, 2035 and 2050. Agenda 2030 is just a milestone within the main 100-year plan.

So Agenda 21 Sustainable Development is the global plan for inventory and control it encompasses every aspect of your life and it's intended to be a wrenching transformation of your life.

That's what senator Al Gore called it when he took the United States group to the largest gathering of heads-of-state and national representatives that had ever been convened up to that time. That was in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992 for the Agenda 21 Conference. Representatives of 178 nations plus the Vatican agreed to this "action plan".

I know you're going to see on Wikipedia that it says it's a "non-binding voluntary agreement," except Agenda 21 is binding on you.

It's been written into the laws of your countries all the way from China, all Western and Middle Eastern nations, all over the world, through a collaboration of governments, corporations and organizations and foundations.

It's a global plan but it's not an international plan. "International" means "between nations" but this plan erases nations. It's global. It's a global plan that's implemented locally, so it has a different name everywhere but it's the same plan. Every aspect of your life is affected, so it's in your school curricula, it's in your planning and building department it's in your court system, in your health care system.

It's everywhere but they never call it "Agenda 21". You're going to see it as regional plans. Often that are called "Plan Bay Area" or "Four States, One Vision" or "Mexico 2030" or "Hanoi 2030" or "Horizon 2050" in Canada, for example.

They're all the same plan. They elevate major economic power centers to a supra-governmental status that is outside of and above the traditional representative government model. These are the mega-regions. They drive the economy and they overpower the nation-state. They combine parts of cities, of states they even combine pieces of nations together.

They destroy boundaries and they ignore legal jurisdictions by creating new economic princedoms. These are new fiefdoms. It's not government. It's governance.

Governance: it's a system made up of public sector agencies, nonprofits, business organizations, advocacy groups, foundations and corporations. What do they have in common? You don't vote for any of that. The larger the entity, the further away it is from you, the less power you have. You get literally taken out of the picture.

This is the new Global State, in which you are a Global Citizen, OK? So, the new state is the means by which you have to serve others for the "common good" and that's defined by the state. It's supposedly from the bottom up. It's something you want but really it's an end-run against you, around your sovereignty. Your sovereignty is eroded, piece by piece.

The question is, "What is the Agenda 21 plan?" When you see it in the public, it's primarily a land use plan. It's the rallying cry for "sustainable development". What do they say? That we're "killing the planet" with our CO₂ emissions. The plan is designed to corral populations into what the UN calls "Islands of human habitation". Human settlements.

Of course., once you're in that concentrated "island of human habitation" formerly called a "city", you're more easily-managed, controlled and surveilled. It might be a city, like the one that Sidewalk Labs, a subsidiary of Google's parent company, Alphabet, a city like they had planned for an area of Toronto. That city was to have had sensors embedded everywhere, literally. And the residents would have their services restricted, unless they exposed every aspect of their lives digitally

If, for example as a resident, you refused to have your data linked to your identity, you would have less rights than others. This is a Smart City. It's a city where I believe Virtual- and Augmented Reality will replace real life and actually be more more appealing. Ultimately, people may spend their entire lives living virtually and those lives are going to be short.

So, what's the justification for this dystopia? The story is that your Greenhouse Gas emissions will be reduced by consolidating populations into these dense city centers, where energy and water usage can be limited. This is going to get you out of the rural areas, where you can basically do what you want, raise your livestock, grow food with water from your well, drive your farm truck and own a firearm.

But in order to implement Agenda 21, your country, state, county, parish, canton, city – whatever – is imposing this land use plan locally, because think about this: where you live has a lot to do with how you live and what your life will be.

So your old life has to be transformed. "Transform". That's code for "destroyed and rebuilt". That's the New Normal. This includes both what they call the "built environment" and the way that you use that physical space. Your beliefs and your expectations have to be transformed and rebuilt, as well your energy use, water use, food consumption, social structure, work, health and your life expectancy views – all of that has to be transformed. And much of that is determined in that regional plan that you've got, right there where you live. I suggest you check it out.

So, how do they destroy your rights? You don't vote for it. You DO pay for it though. That regional plan gets paid for with federal and state grants that pay for consultants, who basically contract to push this through the community. And the few concerned citizens who show up to the "visioning meetings" and the "charettes", as they call them to object, the consultants are there to block opposition. They're basically there to indoctrinate the public. The consultants are trained "change agents" and organizational managers. They're there to give the impression that they've listened to the public and the public approves the plan.

It's all an act. I think you're going to agree that this is a real big deal. It's a tough sell and a huge management problem, even with the deception and the collusion of the corporate media. I should say the partnership, the ownership. It's not easy to destroy nearly 500 years of the nation-state, so it has to be done incrementally, using all of the power and influence of government corporations and organizations, including all tech, entertainment, media and education.

This is a totally mega-corporate plan. It's a joint partnership. It's a public-private partnership between government, the world's largest corporations, banking conglomerates, the big money foundations, like the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, groups like the World Wildlife Fund and the National Religious Partnership for the Environment. It's a closed circle. It only includes you when you agree with their plan.

Of course that's what's meant by getting the approval of "the community". "The community" is anyone who agrees with the plan. If you don't agree, you're not "the community". Dissent is not permitted. These major foundations, they give grants to thousands of startup organizations. They train and they fund spin-off groups that look like benevolent non-profits and neighborhood associations.

This whole system, it acts as the lower bureaucracy for the new system and this is basically the ultimate enemy of the individual. So to make Agenda 21 happen, it requires the full integration of systems in order to control them centrally. That's the standardization of all systems and the new currency is information and energy.

In order to have centralized control, full globalization, it's necessary to standardize all law, all education, all culture, all finance. In order to merge, it has to be standardized. This was impossible until the advent of the Computer Age. Now, it's inevitable. This is why every schoolchild is given a computer and the internet is now in tiny villages in every nation.

Your educational system is used to manipulate you into thinking of yourself as a "global citizen". I hope you don't, because a global citizen is not a citizen, at all and has no rights. Under UN Agenda 21 Sustainable Development. What's termed a "right" is really a "privilege" and it can be taken away or granted at any time.

Of course conversely, punishment can be imposed without redress. So, this explains how the UN can call universal internet connectivity a "human right". During COVID, Unicef the UN Children's Educational Fund, they created a project called GIGA and the goal is to get every school in the world to do online classes and the term for this is "direct instruction". Nothing comes between the child and the computer. It makes standardized indoctrination really easy.

And of course, you all know that as a startup, Google was funded by the intelligence community, in order to spy on people who searched specific topics on the internet. So then, they could identify those people. Basically turns the tables on us and exposes us to surveillance. Now, billions of people voluntarily carry a surveillance device at all times.

When you hear the term "Smart", whether it's a smartphone or smartcar or smarthome or whatever – this is an acronym: S-M-A-R-T: Sustainability, Monitoring, Assessing, Rating and Tracking. You.

GIGA, the Children's Universal Connectivity Project has digitalized more during 10 weeks of covet than in the last 10 years. For this they need 5G and for that they need decentralized energy production that enables digitalized experimentation and spying on large populations without their consent or knowledge. Sort of a digital colonization.

Mega-corporations are out there, they're searching for people who add value, who are innovators. Corporations want to own innovation. Not everybody has value in this system, this new system. Most of you don't. Most likely, you're worth less than your student loan. Your value, your social credit score is based on whether you produce more than you consume and whether you serve or obstruct the state.

Government has overcome our Constitutional rights by merging with private corporations who can operate without restraint in secret, punishing, purging and disappearing dissidents, like Facebook and Google and Twitter and Amazon have done virtually; this is globalization.

Globalization erases the boundaries, going from the city all the way up to the nation. It's the end of representative government.

Now, I know you might think that government is an obstacle, it's a danger and it doesn't represent you, anyway, so who cares, right? Well, I do know who I'm speaking to, here and actually, I agree. But at least in the United States, government was originally conceived as representative. It was like you were a busy farmer or a merchant and you elected a representative who agreed to give up a few years of their life to handling that stuff, so you didn't have to.

These positions were never intended to be lifelong gigs. Now, people like Pelosi and McConnell are in government for 50 years. Well, why is that? It's because they keep getting voted in. The money that elects them keeps them there. At the top, power has no party.

So what do the Globalist controllers want? Agenda 21 is designed for management efficiency. mega-corporations want to have harmonized, integrated laws and regulations and as few as possible, so they don't have to change their business or retool to sell in different markets. They want no borders and open markets. They want to kill competition, no matter how small and engineer demand. They want to deal with as few decision-makers as possible, ideally, just one.

They want to merge with government. They want workers suited for the work needed and easily discarded. They want to own innovation, so they want direct connection with universities. They want to control all resources, human and natural, because you know, humans are a resource – or more likely, you're a hindrance.

Mega-corporations need full control and total information. This is the digital revolution. It's the Fourth Industrial Revolution. It is the Great Reset. The previous three industrial revolutions mainly focused on energy and hardware. Whether it was steam or gas or electronics, these new energies radically restructured society, all the way from the family, to work, to cities to government – everything, completely restructured.

This is the Fourth Industrial Revolution now, the Digital Revolution. It's the explosion of technology moving faster than the speed of ethics and oversight and it eclipses all previous three revolutions. From Artificial Intelligence having the potential to change the nature of the human being, to robotics being used for policing, to smartbuildings and sensors that monitor us continuously.

This revolution enables an uncertain future. The Fourth Industrial Revolution, in the context of the first three represents a phenomenal acceleration, in terms of time and the ability to control the masses, transform and disrupt, "Build Back Better". When you hear that, know that you can't rebuild it unless you break it, first.

They call it the "New Social Contract" – the one you didn't agree to! The Great Reset concept, that "You won't own anything", you'll rent anything you need, you've got to look at that through the lens of private property. *You* are your most important private property. To lose ownership of your Freedom of Speech, of -Movement – basically, of your Free Will – that means you lose what is most important to you. It reduces your expectations for a full life and forces you into a new era of austerity, of scarcity.

That ain't easy. It's not easy to do this. The loss of freedom in the most vital of ways, the independence and privacy of the body and mind that demands what they call the "New Normal", you don't come to that place without a major crisis.

The self-styled Globalist controllers who intended to totally disrupt the future, they considered what kind of a crisis would be necessary to make one world governance a reality? One that expands beyond the corporations into our homes and our bodies? The way I look at it, global crisis requires a global response – and that justifies global governance.

It really takes a major crisis – a global crisis – to break the identification with your nation and your culture – something like Climate Change, right? It creates an existential terror that "we're destroying the planet" and our entire way of life is a threat to its continued existence. Hey, that ain't science! Science is made to fit the desired result, in this situation, it is the Green Mask. So behind that mask of environmental concern, you find the lust for global, centralized, totalitarian control.

The Climate Change threat is a stage, it's a phase. It's designed to prepare us for more restrictions and limitations and now we're experiencing, of course a much more pervasive and restrictive threat. They brought out the Big Gun, the new existential threat is COVID 19.

In fact, the World Wildlife Fund says that COVID is, quote "Nature's response to man's abuse of the environment" unquote. Are they serious? Nature is a terrorist. So, invisible, colorless, odorless, scarcely-detectable, COVID is the new mask for the New Normal.

9/11 was the justification for the Security State. COVID enables the surveillance state. COVID justifies global enforcement. Truly tailor-made for the New World Order, COVID has issued in house arrest purges of truth-tellers, economic collapse, the full empowerment of these mega-corporations.

And of course, how could I forget? The lineup of the willing dictators, from Macron in France, to Ardern in New Zealand, to Trudeau in Canada to Harris in the US, to Cuomo, Newsom, Whitmer, Garcetti, Lightfoot and dozens of others, all across the world.

In the competition for the rule of the mega-regions, the willing collaborators are stepping up locally, as well, of course and this is really what the last four years have been about: separate the wheat from the chaff, the loyal from the dissidents. That's how it's done. Mao Zedong did this in China, with his "Let 100 Flowers Bloom" campaign. He encouraged his loyal followers to critique his programs, so that he could make them better, but really he did it to identify and purge his critics – which he did.

So what I'm talking about here is power. Those with power want to keep it. Those without it want it. There have always been people who wanted to control the world. What's changed is the capacity for control has expanded in velocity and scope, in a way that has never before been possible.

So now, as I conclude, I want to encourage you. I want to encourage you to be brave; to find the joy in simply being alive. Ask yourself: "What do I value?" Recognize you, yourself are part of the reason that we're in this situation. Have you preferred convenience to liberty? The Free World requires liberty with responsibility and that takes work.

The work we do can be full of pitfalls, full of controlled opposition, which appears to be the answer but instead is a sort of a green-washed, candy-coated twisted circle of propaganda that goes back to the Green Mask. So you gotta stop and think.

Never go along to get along. Know that there will be no Switzerland in this New World, no place to hide. So the time to resist is now. Refuse to collaborate. Don't carry a smartphone. Don't volunteer to give your biometrics or DNA. Don't cooperate. Opt out, while you can and please, prepare to work to stay free. It takes all of us working to make this happen.

Above all, my friends, remember who you are, laugh, dance and love and join us in creating the Greater Reset.

Thank you so much."

[Eva2]

LIBRTI SOCIAL NETWORK PRESENTS
WITH THE FORUM FOR CANADIAN SOVEREIGNTY
https://www.librti.com/summit/


MARCH 2 - 10
5PM PST / 8PM EST
Discover the Truth Behind “The Great Reset” and How the Wealthy & Powerful Use Crisis, Technology, Cultural Trends, and the Economy to Create a New and Frightening Future for Your Children

… And how You Can Prepare Yourself & Your Family, Strategize and Collaborate with a Network of Like-Minded People Standing Up, Taking Action & Creating a Better Life For Our Communities.


We’ve interviewed 14 incredible experts and leaders in a variety of fields to give you a better understanding of what “The Great Reset” is all about, how “they” will implement their plan, and what each of us can actually do about it.
SIGN Up To Be Notified When Interviews Go Live, to watch the LIVE Broadcasts, and access all the recordings.
OPTION 1:
Create Your Free Account on Librti.com to be notified after Videos are Released.
OPTION 2:
Enter your email below to Receive Email Notifications before Every LIVE Broadcast.



We respect your email privacy

Join Your Hosts...

Odessa Orlewicz
"Liberty Talk Canada"

Mark Friesen
"The Grizzly Patriot"
...As they sit down and discuss the economy, politics, climate change, cryptocurrencies, the medical industry, vaccinations, global lockdowns, covid-19 and so much more with...
Our Panel of Experts:
Marc Morano
Alex Newman
Rosa Koire
Denis Rancourt
Salim Mansur
Tom Deweese
Curtis Stone
Dr. Judy Mikovits
Dr. Carrie Medaj
Mark Moss
Dan Dicks
Brad Johnson
Maxine Bernier
Shawn Taylor
https://www.librti.com/summit/

[Tintin]

Following Jill's post immediately above, here's the video of Carrie Madej:

[Eva2]

Building blocks for the grand finale:
'Canada's immigration minister defends outsourcing visa office to company run by Beijing police'

'OTTAWA – Immigration Minister Marco Mendicino said he is confident a contract with a company owned by the Beijing police adequately protects personal information of people applying to Canada for visas.

Canada has since 2008 contracted the Beijing Shuangxiong Foreign Service Company, to run visa processing services for people seeking to visit Canada. The company is run by the Beijing Municipal Public Security Bureau.

Mendicino insisted the government is closely monitoring the company with regular audits and security screening of all employees who work there.

“We are eyes wide open on this issue and we will continue to manage these risks going forward,” he said.

At the House of Commons immigration committee on Wednesday, Conservative MP Jasraj Singh Hallan asked Mendicino if the government was even considering the massive risk of espionage.

He said simply screening staff isn’t sufficient in a country like China.

“The Chinese Communist Party develops a fake identity with an attempt to infiltrate our overseas visa office, via espionage and collect visa applications and then runs them through the hiring process for the subcontractor. How would we even know about it?” Hallan asked. “Even one Chinese spy could destroy the entire functioning of the office and cause a significant security threat.”

NDP immigration critic Jenny Kwan said she doesn’t understand why the government can’t see the problem.

“The truth is the entire structure stinks and this is a huge conflict of interest for the safety of applicants,” she said.

The minister also took several questions on the situation in Hong Kong and whether Canada would do more to ensure people could leave Hong Kong, as the former British colony is facing an erosion of democratic rights and a new national security law.

Later this week, it is expected China will further tighten its grip on Hong Kong with changes to the electoral system that will further restrict the area’s independence.

Mendicino said the government is working with allies to monitor the situation.

“At this difficult moment. Canada stands shoulder to shoulder with the people of Hong Kong and shares the grave concerns of the international community.”

Late last year, the government opened up more opportunities for people from Hong Kong to immigrate to Canada, including allowing students to apply for work permits, but the government has not been clear about whether more widespread resettlement for refugees could be possible.

Mendicino did commit that no one arrested in any of the large scale protests Hong Kong has seen would be banned from coming to Canada.

“No Hong Kongers will be prevented from coming to Canada or claiming asylum, because they have participated in peaceful protests.” '