|
![]() |
#1 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 319
|
![]()
ive talked about this in other threads but id like to ask the community what they think. i mean NO disrespect to st clair, burisch, wilcock and others with these questions. they might be 100% absolutley spot on regarding these matters. ok here we go.
(first off let me state im going off of dr steven greer's statements that grey's and reptillians are 'programmed life forms" used covertly with psy op tech to perform abductions and perform genetic research as well as create a xenophopic and scared reaction to ET's) 1. if greys are extremely evolved and technologically advanced, why go to all the trouble to abduct someone when they could easily snag a few million hair samples take them back to the ship/or planet and have an army of humans to experiment on to their hearts content. they could come here get it and we'd never see them again, most likely without much fuss. if greys are from the future and came back to find a cure for their race and work with our scientists in exchange for their technology- 2. why would they need to work with our scientists if theyre 45,000 years ahead of us? thats like us going back in time to build a nuclear fusion reactor with a neanderthal. 3.if we have a treaty with them for technology, why are we shooting down UFO's with scalar technology to back engineer them? why are we grilling the live ET captures for info as clifford stone says? 4. if they're from the future why would they bother to come to the 20th century when we'd be more technologically a threat than say 10,000 bc or 300 AD? why bother with treaties at all? 5. why are the "good guys" the "Nordics", aka our future selves blonde haired and blue eyed? is that the best of the best genetic stock? is chinese, african, latino inferior? after 52,000 years did we decide to eliminate them? does that sound like a "good" future, or does it sound like Hitler's master race? doesnt that sound like something Nazi's brought here in the 40's and 50's and in the service of the shadow gov/black ops might like us to think? 6. assuming the "greys" are not our military's genetic creations, that means they are ET's interfering with our development. why would other ET's watching us allow them to do so? it would be like us watching and observing animals in a zoo and some crazy guy goes into the monkey cage and starts grabbing the chimps and screwing with them-why would the zookeepers allow this? they wouldnt. 7.assume for a moment that very very highly technologically and spiritually evolved beings watch many planets such as ours and many others (as i believe), and we have most likely been quarratined here until we can act peacfully, isnt it safe to assume other races have been watched and put under these same guidlines? in other words how can hostile beings be here experimenting on us? why would they be allowed to leave their biosphere? 8. if the "nordics" kicked the "greys" out of there system or reptillians were "dumped" here as many say, wouldnt those higher beings or "nordics" be directly responsible for much of our pain and misery? to do a thing consciously and knowingly? thats a high karmic price to pay for such evolved enlightened beings. if a 6th grade teacher kicks a disruptive student out of class and into the kindergarten class next door, and that same student starts to kick the crap out of the kindergartners and manipulate them, isnt the teacher responsible dont you think the teacher would send the kid firstly to the principle's office where a more powerful person is in charge of the bad 6th grader? 9. who benefits from a paranoid "alien agenda" scenario? 10. is it a coincidence that the mass reporting of "abduction phenomena" (not contactees) has been reported after roswell (perhaps the first time the military could back engineer the technology) and that we brought nazi eugenics/ space program scientists over here and that theyve hijacked the ET phenomena to covertly continue their warped agenda? 10. isnt it possible that the shadow government/black ops have enough sophisticated tech to implement "channeled" messages to inherently psychic people, and that much can damage can be done through mind control/ psychotronics to manipulate the UFO community? 11. doesnt the lack of discussion concerning PLF"S (prgrammed life forms) among the UFO community suggest that maybe the shadow government wants it that way? anyhow i could go on and on, id like to hear what people think and if they have answers to these questions. personally my mind isnt made up, but it does make sense that real ET contact is few and far between and the bulk of it is disinfo,hoaxed, military, mind control etc. meanwhile the real ET's watch the shadow goverment's manipulation of this whole subject what do yall think? ![]() Last edited by clarkkent; 09-20-2008 at 03:41 AM. Reason: wanted more people to see title |
![]() |
![]() |
Tags |
greer, greys, nordics, plfs, ufo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|