Poll on the believability of Project Camelot whistle blowers

KathyT · 10-26-2009, 02:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chitty

I didn't see a None Of The Above Box.

Ditto.

And why aren't there others on the list?

Ross H · 10-26-2009, 03:31 AM

poor ole Dan's got no votes??

Luminari · 10-26-2009, 03:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KathyT

Ditto.

And why aren't there others on the list?

Who would you suggest?

TheObserver · 10-26-2009, 04:28 AM

I haven't seen Alex Collier or Patrick Geryl yet, but i picked Wilcock, Bob Dean and Arthur (Henry).
Something about Arthur's less than articulate nerdy shyness sets him apart from the other guys that do the lecture circuit.
(Other than his uncharacteristic "i've been to mars!" outburst at that conference of course)

Ross H · 10-26-2009, 04:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheObserver

I haven't seen Alex Collier or Patrick Geryl yet, but i picked Wilcock, Bob Dean and Arthur (Henry).
Something about Arthur's less than articulate nerdy shyness sets him apart from the other guys that do the lecture circuit.
(Other than his uncharacteristic "i've been to mars!" outburst at that conference of course)

Patrick Geryl...well what do you say??? HMMM, Most "matter of fact" pulls no punches!! TOTALLY believes what he says. He is TOTALLY science.

Worth a watch,http://www.projectcamelot.org/index.html

peace always

Luminari · 10-26-2009, 04:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jross

Patrick Geryl...well what do you say??? HMMM, Most "matter of fact" pulls no punches!! TOTALLY believes what he says. He is TOTALLY science.

Worth a watch,http://www.projectcamelot.org/index.html

peace always

If Geryl is right, we are all going to die. What are we going to do to seize our lives back from the Technosphere and truly enjoy the next couple of years incase they are our last?

Although... the fact that he is all science could be his undoing if he fails to factor in the awesome power of some of the guardian races orbiting in motherships. They could even alter the Sun I believe... but would they.

Carrie1971 · 10-26-2009, 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Luminari

If Geryl is right, we are all going to die. What are we going to do to seize our lives back from the Technosphere and truly enjoy the next couple of years incase they are our last?

Although... the fact that he is all science could be his undoing if he fails to factor in the awesome power of some of the guardian races orbiting in motherships. They could even alter the Sun I believe... but would they.

WE are NOT going to die.
WE are ALL going to die.
Both are true...

However just because our body we live in here on "earth" which my good friend calls "earthsuit" is only a host for our soul. Which is not going to die.

We are all here to learn some "thing" ..

Each person here and now on the planet at this point in "TIME" have a mission or we need to learn a lesson : OR three....

I am not voting on the poll. We each find our own truth. What I think is not what you think. We each can see the very same event in real time and we will both remember it in a way diffrent then the other. Point of view.

Keep in mind two things.

Life is a gift, and we have to keep trying.

Luminari · 10-26-2009, 06:08 AM

Lalalalala..

Anchor · 10-27-2009, 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Luminari

... we are all going to die.

Balian of Ibelin: You go with the army?
Hospitaller: My order is with the army.
Balian of Ibelin: You go to certain death.
Hospitaller: All death is certain. I shall tell your father what I've seen you become.

A..

franciejones · 10-30-2009, 05:00 PM

well....two years ago I was much more naive. I have to say that no one on the list truly inspires me to "give a click"...

Bob Dean is cool. But he has nothing new so anything else he may say...might be false. Also....all the Jesus stuff he says IMO is just ridiculous.

David Wilcock is ok.....a know-it-all money-maker....but has interesting things to say nonetheless.

Bill Deagle??? Seriously? He is a schill in my opinion.

Deacon? I cannot say enough against the guy. After that baloney on stage....ugh...I have less than zero respect OR belief of anything he says.

Dan Burisch...it makes me laugh that folks believe him. Even two years ago, I knew he was out right lying.

Pete Peterson----total body language and facial expressions of a liar. NON-starter in my opinion.

I love Marrs tho...he is an excellent source of information for certain.

Steven · 10-30-2009, 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by franciejones

...total body language and facial expressions of a liar...

I am glad to notice some of us knows the signs of the body, their is also the signs of the voice, ultimately their is reverse speech, which is easy to do on your own pc.

I suggest you try reverse speech with some parts on all of them if you are going to play the guess who said the lie game...

Namaste, Steven

TRANCOSO · 10-30-2009, 06:51 PM

Dr. Beagle & Dan Rubbish are in a fierce contest who will be the least believable whistle blower.

View Poll Results: Tick the one who has the most/best truth
George Green	15	26.79%
David Wilcock	21	37.50%
Dr Bill Deagle	3	5.36%
Henry Deacon	6	10.71%
Dan Burisch	1	1.79%
Bob Dean	24	42.86%
Pete Peterson	6	10.71%
Alex Collier	19	33.93%
Patrick Geryl	0	0%
All	1	1.79%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 56. You may not vote on this poll

10-26-2009, 03:31 AM	#2
Ross H Project Avalon Moderator Join Date: May 2009 Location: Queensland Australia Posts: 507	Re: Poll on the believability of Project Camelot whistle blowers poor ole Dan's got no votes??

10-26-2009, 04:28 AM	#4
TheObserver Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: back in Minnesota Posts: 500	Re: Poll on the believability of Project Camelot whistle blowers I haven't seen Alex Collier or Patrick Geryl yet, but i picked Wilcock, Bob Dean and Arthur (Henry). Something about Arthur's less than articulate nerdy shyness sets him apart from the other guys that do the lecture circuit. (Other than his uncharacteristic "i've been to mars!" outburst at that conference of course)

10-26-2009, 06:08 AM	#8
Luminari Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Australia Posts: 2,570	Re: Poll on the believability of Project Camelot whistle blowers Lalalalala.. Last edited by Luminari; 10-26-2009 at 10:25 AM.

10-30-2009, 05:00 PM	#10
franciejones Banned Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 307	Re: Poll on the believability of Project Camelot whistle blowers well....two years ago I was much more naive. I have to say that no one on the list truly inspires me to "give a click"... Bob Dean is cool. But he has nothing new so anything else he may say...might be false. Also....all the Jesus stuff he says IMO is just ridiculous. David Wilcock is ok.....a know-it-all money-maker....but has interesting things to say nonetheless. Bill Deagle??? Seriously? He is a schill in my opinion. Deacon? I cannot say enough against the guy. After that baloney on stage....ugh...I have less than zero respect OR belief of anything he says. Dan Burisch...it makes me laugh that folks believe him. Even two years ago, I knew he was out right lying. Pete Peterson----total body language and facial expressions of a liar. NON-starter in my opinion. I love Marrs tho...he is an excellent source of information for certain.

10-30-2009, 06:51 PM	#12
TRANCOSO Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Amsterdam Posts: 964	Re: Poll on the believability of Project Camelot whistle blowers Dr. Beagle & Dan Rubbish are in a fierce contest who will be the least believable whistle blower.