Nassim Haramein *new interview*

[DoctorWho]

David Wilcock and Nassim have just recently met in person and have hooked up professionally. Check David's latest blog.
http://divinecosmos.com/index.php/st...assim-haramein
Bill "the Doctor"

[Seashore]

Originally Posted by DoctorWho

Check David's latest blog.
http://divinecosmos.com/index.php/st...assim-haramein

"We will be filming a full-on, Ph.D.-level discussion between Nassim and me about physics, where we speak on equal par with each other without stopping to explain terms along the way."

Can David Wilcock speak on an equal par with Nassim about physics?

[pineal-pilot-in merkabah]

http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com.../nharamein.htm


p\art 1 of 2 ofwhats going on with nassim on CMN

enjoy

[P4BL0]

[Seashore]

Originally Posted by P4BL0

Nassim Haramein is Da Man!

He has spoken in his presentations that a friend taught him how to meditate and that meditation has played a role in his research. I'm hoping that he will elaborate on this in an interview at some point. I wish Nassim would also write about his experiences in this area, as well.

He really is an extraordinary individual. I love his work.

[P4BL0]

[P4BL0]

[Luminari]

PART 2

Nassim Haramein on Conscious Media Network free interview released today.

http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com...nharamein2.htm

[Luminari]

Nassim does it again. Thank you.. and massive respect to Regina and CMN.

[Luminari]

Another *new* 1 hour interview with Nassim Haramein.
This one is;

Nassim Haramein interviewed by KnowWonder on the world puja network.

Enjoy!

http://vimeo.com/7813854

[micjer]

Thanks for the link. We are witnessing a genius at work.

[xlsander]

the other day i mailed a friend - i havent seen in 10 years - he is writing his doctor in quantum mechanics as we speak and has been at various universities - he didnt know haramein before but his reply was pretty harsh - i will translate from german:

I am sorry, i just dont understand why people seek their intellectual kicks at people such as mr. haramein instead of starting with known physics which is fantastic enough. Why don't you start by learning to understand quantum mechanics and the the relativity theory from well-established physicists which is mind blowing enough. People like haramein always seem the same - they understand the half of something or use just a quote out of the full context without having understood the full theory correctly and draw heir own conclusions/theories out of that.

for example renormalization: he speaks about how sceptic physicists in teh 60ies, in a time where al this wasnt as well understood as now - however in fact this is not just a very physical (meaning it has a direct physical interpretation) phenomenon, but also is used as selection criteria for theories. Only theories that are renormalizable are really fundamental.
renormalization itself is the process that depicts how a theory changes when the energy scale ( or lenght scale) is changed. for example if you start with a theory that describes activites on 0.1nm and you then average groups of particles - so that you dont use every single particle but every averaged group as fundamental size (=variable). and what happens when you switch from one scale to another is called renormalization. Of course the vacuume everything but empty, but we know that for 80 years already. however when you try to pull energy from the vacuum ( = particles) this is only possible when something else ( no tthe vacuum) looses energy.
for example hawking radiation of black holes is exactly that.
but to state the vacuum has infinite energy is nonsense.
This is the result of "your theory" and the reason is that in the beginning "you" assumed that the "constants" of "my theory" (for example electric charges or mass of my particles) is the same on all scales. however, this is not the case and has been measured very very accurately, that the constants change form scale to scale (=running coupling constants).

The process of this misinterpretation ( = that constants are really constant which result is infinite enrgy of the vacuum) is called renormalization, where you look exactly how the theory and coupling constants behave on a different scale.

to say the vacuum has infinite energy simply shows this haramein doesnt really understand it.

------------

hope my translation makes sense in english - i wanted to share and maybe there are some physical fit people here to take the discussion further

[Seashore]

Originally Posted by xlsander

People like haramein always seem the same - they understand the half of something or use just a quote out of the full context without having understood the full theory correctly and draw heir own conclusions/theories out of that.

From the Conscious Media Network website re. the interview with Haramein:

"This unification theory, known as the Haramein-Rauscher metric (a new solution to Einstein's Field Equations that incorporates torque and Coriolis effects) and his most recent paper The Schwarzschild Proton, lays down the foundation of what could be a fundamental change in our current understandings of physics and consciousness. This groundbreaking theory has now been delivered to the scientific community through peer-reviewed papers and presentations at international physics conferences. Further, The Schwarzschild Proton paper has recently received the prestigious 'Best Paper Award' in the field of physics, quantum mechanics, relativity, field theory, and gravitation at the University of Liège, Belgium during the 9th International Conference CASYS'09."

*********************************************

It sounds to me that he has been recognized by his peers for his understanding of the big picture.

[pineal-pilot-in merkabah]

the other day i mailed a friend - i havent seen in 10 years - he is writing his doctor in quantum mechanics as we speak and has been at various universities - he didnt know haramein before but his reply was pretty harsh - i will translate from german: quoting XL SANDER

has you friend made a free enenrgy motor that warped the spacetime of his living room floor ??? quantum physcis is just sorcerers manipulation of matter. hes obv not looking at the big picture.. spending too much time in the minutea perhaps.. quantum physics has jsut one big theory so hes no different than any other physicist..its just theories

all that stuff written above is total rubbish.. the masons have known this for a very long time. the physics your friend is learning is a rabbit hole to be sent down sowe dont learn the truth. we are the profane after all

[joe2288]

[xlsander]

that award thing is great! can anyone explain the outlining of this finding in here in lets say a gregg braden kind of way ??

[aroundthetable]

Thanks for the new links lumi

[Antonia]

Yeah thanks for the links Luminari... I could listen to Nassem Haramien for ever.. he always makes such sense...and makes physics easy to understand... I always think .."But off course!" when listening to him!

[Luminari]

Originally Posted by Luminari

PART 2

Nassim Haramein on Conscious Media Network free interview released today.

http://www.consciousmedianetwork.com...nharamein2.htm

Originally Posted by Luminari

Another *new* 1 hour interview with Nassim Haramein.
This one is;

Nassim Haramein interviewed by KnowWonder on the world puja network.

Enjoy!

http://vimeo.com/7813854

These are the most recent, regards- Lumi

[Luminari]

[ConstantChange]

The Resonance project reminds me alot of the word Renaissance considering we are getting "reborn" again these times; not to mention the fact that time is speeding up and all those things that happened between 1400-1800ish (I think?) will happen in a span of much shorter, as we percieve it now, linear time.

Source of the latter statement can be found here: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yYhveJjg8Uw) can't exactly remember where as of now, unfortunately

edit:

How is the tetrahedron placed inside the octahedron in regards to the god-geometry-symbol somebody mentioned?