|
|
What Does It Mean ? What does this all mean for the Ground Crew ? |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,098
|
![]()
I do enjoy your inputs, seeing a different point of view brings up new questions that make me look for answers.
Remember the first day when the Pakistan Military leader Stated flat out there is no Al Queda or Terrorist in Pakistan's tribal region as the US Military had drones in the air, bombing and killing their Operations Leader... Made the Pakistan Military leader look clueless... Next thing we knew, the head of NATO flew out for the meeting. Right after that, the government announced that NATO will be pursuing them into the country... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Eastern U.S.
Posts: 429
|
![]() Quote:
Therefore, if even a miniscule amount of skepticism is applied to our "war on terror", then the "mainstream"/ Bush justification for violating the borders of any nation is in jeopardy, much less the border of a nation that up until very recently we have called "friends", "allies", "compatriots", et cetera. One might ask, "How can this issue of a border dispute with Pakistan EVEN exist?", "Are we not brothers in the fight against the Taliban?", "Do we not oppose an undemocratic Ahfganistan together?", etc... etc... In other words, once the "Al Qaeda as the ultimate enemy of mankind" or "if the Taliban is not destroyed, freedom will die" arguments fail to hold up, then the excuses for crossing the Pakistan border similarly fail. If that is the case, then the Pakistani cries for "sovereignty of their OWN border" can be seen in a different light than the Mullen/Rice/Bush viewpoint of "Hey, we're just getting the bad guys, like we talked about." I think that neither the Pakistani government, no matter how involved with the West they committed themselves, nor the Pakistani people, will ultimately see things the Bush way. Let's see where it goes, and keep the info coming ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,098
|
![]()
several threats towards Iran has come out in recent weeks from Al Queda...
They are accusing them of being allies of the US against Afghanistan and Iraq... Kind of a twisted view, but I know you understand the two edged sword mentioned in your last post. If they directed the same towards the leadership of Pakistan, the whole country would explode into violence. I did get out of the government from Pakistan what I was hoping to see... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Eastern U.S.
Posts: 429
|
![]()
Understood, Rocky, and it goes towards the theory of "the taking of sides" I have outlined in other posts. Let's see what happens.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | ||
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,098
|
![]()
a little bird laid this before me, all I can do is smile...
Story Link Quote:
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Eastern U.S.
Posts: 429
|
![]()
US defies Pakistan with new air raid
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au...-25837,00.html Pakistani president tells foreign troops to keep out http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapc...n.sovereignty/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,098
|
![]() Quote:
They can't handle it which is why there is going to be coordination starting, but al queda's enemy is the US, for us to open a base there is going to give them a "target" What do you think is going to happen the first time al queda makes an attack on the US base? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | ||
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 1,098
|
![]()
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7651249.stm
Quote:
Quote:
![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|