Cracking the Code

[Christo888]

...In the physical sense, this leads to antigravity, even though it may not be 'true' antigravity.

Maybe E=MCsq Csq; adding back in the removed nemesis to 22 physics calc's: 'G',? A world with anti-matter / anti-gravity back where it belongs?

And seeing the real world outside of hollywoods Phi phenomena and Beta movement?

[GregorArturo]

Originally Posted by Christo888

...In the physical sense, this leads to antigravity, even though it may not be 'true' antigravity.

Maybe E=MCsq Csq; adding back in the removed nemesis to 22 physics calc's: 'G',? A world with anti-matter / anti-gravity back where it belongs?

And seeing the real world outside of hollywoods Phi phenomena and Beta movement?

First, E=MC^2 is based on mass relative to gravity. Gravity is not based on mass. Gravity is based on the rotary spin of an object, specifically an atom, but also applies on the macro level say with a flying saucer or a planet. When the planet spins, it forms an axis which generates your poles and a magnetic field. If you are referring to dark matter (anti-matter), then that is your torsion fields that are generated by this rotary spin, the so called graviton those dumb ass physicists are searching for while they play god with the LHC.

BTW, I just made another major breakthrough that explains and unearths patterns in Earth's frequency structure, no pun intended. Including the Solfeggio frequencies and the pyramids. Just need to work out some equations. Stay tuned...

[Christo888]

So... if Gravity is not based on mass then we never needed fuels and propellents? And anti-matter, dark-matter... a torsion field? So does equilibrium in some form allow the revolving door to open, a change in perceptual understanding, inside out let's say?

[GregorArturo]

Originally Posted by Christo888

So... if Gravity is not based on mass then we never needed fuels and propellents? And anti-matter, dark-matter... a torsion field? So does equilibrium in some form allow the revolving door to open, a change in perceptual understanding, inside out let's say?

Exactly, fuel and propellants are essentially primitive and very soon to be outdated. The door in my best understanding is do to some sort of equilibrium which Ed seemed to of understood very well.

Here is an updated chart of frequencies with their propagating frequency at 90 degrees to it, or perpendicular. Each of the perpendicular frequencies can also be branched out into its related harmonics/overtones.

I thought I had made an interesting discovery, as the Schumann frequencies (SR0-SR5) were in perfect linear order from 1 to 6 in terms of quantum numerology. However, I seen realized I was using complimentary angles, not perpendicular, which I have since fixed. Other interesting patterns I noticed due to this seemed to of disappeared. Regardless, it is an interesting synchronicity I stumbled on by accident.



The second set below is the Solfeggio frequencies while the third set relates to supposed harmonics with the pyramids. However, I have come across major discrepancies on these frequencies and currently working with my archeology professor at my school [who is really intrigued by my work] to resolve these frequencies. I have to lean toward that the Sarcophagus is 441 Hz, while the King's Chamber (Int 1) is 16 Hz. 33Hz (Int 2) is an obscure frequency I came across that is supposedly the frequency of the entire interior. Sar 3 and King are also pretty obscure. 16 Hz is also a perfect C, and is an undertone to Quartz's resonance (and 24 Hz is G). Also, the exterior of the pyramid at 1.5 Hz (G) collaborates with SR0. At the very bottom, you'll see F#. This is supposedly what the Egyptians considered very sacred and used it in chanting. F# is rather close to the natural frequency of the Earth's spin.

So, as I already stated, if one can find the natural resonance frequency of a stone/crystal, then find the frequency perpendicular to the stone while in the presence of a large magnetic, electrical, and torsion field, the stone will then levitate. And note, those fields CAN be generated by a human being, however, it requires a tremendous amount of psychic skill. The angle in which these angles propagate from [and in how they interact] I still need to work out fully with graphing/simulation.

[Christo888]

Light outside... dark inside. Light inside... equilibrium?

[DapperDaze]

Originally Posted by GregorArturo

First, E=MC^2 is based on mass relative to gravity. Gravity is not based on mass. Gravity is based on the rotary spin of an object, specifically an atom, but also applies on the macro level say with a flying saucer or a planet. When the planet spins, it forms an axis which generates your poles and a magnetic field. If you are referring to dark matter (anti-matter), then that is your torsion fields that are generated by this rotary spin, the so called graviton those dumb ass physicists are searching for while they play god with the LHC.

BTW, I just made another major breakthrough that explains and unearths patterns in Earth's frequency structure, no pun intended. Including the Solfeggio frequencies and the pyramids. Just need to work out some equations. Stay tuned...

Gregor, check out Nassim Haramein: http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...99791256390335
He shares your "dumbass physicists" belief. I think you two are completely on the same path, but it seems your views are slightly different on dark matter and gravity. His work on the unified field theory and sacred geometry of the tetrahedron, while paired with your work could be quite significant. I have no doubt all of this mathematically ties together nicely. I think what his work lacks you make for and vice versa. The video is long but flows nicely, enjoy.