Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours

The voice of One · 12-01-2008, 11:06 AM

Please tell me what you make of this...

http://educate-yourself.org/zsl/arct...s18nov08.shtml

And the Seismic activity going on at the moment...

http://www.iris.edu/seismon/

elsinorelore · 12-01-2008, 11:47 AM

Hey, I find this extremely interesting! If you find out any more, please post it!!!
Thanks!!!

12-01-2008, 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by elsinorelore

Hey, I find this extremely interesting! If you find out any more, please post it!!!
Thanks!!!

I'll second that - and thanks for the link.

I wonder what the end game there is . . .

Dantheman62 · 12-01-2008, 04:08 PM

Nine H-bombs wouldn't be enough to shift the north magnetic pole, it would take alot more than that! If oil was involved than they surely wouldn't let all that money just float away. I would like to see more evidence of the explosions.

Myra · 12-01-2008, 04:55 PM

Great. More Radiation floating around.

I don't know. Are they trying to circumvent the Magnetic Pole Shift? Whatever they're doing setting off a bunch of Nukes can't be good.

GoingToFast · 12-01-2008, 05:14 PM

This page is on my Favorit's list now.

http://www.iris.edu/seismon/

Antaletriangle · 12-01-2008, 05:19 PM

Interesting info.Thanks for sharing.

oldpaganfreak · 12-01-2008, 05:30 PM

i'm afraid that i just don't believe this. this report claims that the nukes were expolded on canadian territory. there are inuit settlements near there, as well as conventional oil exploration. just because something is 'claimed to be true' on the net does not make it so. this is certainly an example of that. i have many family and friends employed in oil exploration. blowing 9 nukes could hardly be hidden from us.
i would have to see a lot more compelling evidence before i would believe it.
canadians have very strong feelings about nuclear testing. the inuit would cewrtainly be raising sh*t about it and we have heard nothing in even the off beat news sources about this.
sorry....ain't true.

Antaletriangle · 12-01-2008, 05:40 PM

Hey,don't be sorry if it's not true surely it's good news!

davefla73 · 12-04-2008, 01:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oldpaganfreak

i'm afraid that i just don't believe this. this report claims that the nukes were expolded on canadian territory. there are inuit settlements near there, as well as conventional oil exploration. just because something is 'claimed to be true' on the net does not make it so. this is certainly an example of that. i have many family and friends employed in oil exploration. blowing 9 nukes could hardly be hidden from us.
i would have to see a lot more compelling evidence before i would believe it.
canadians have very strong feelings about nuclear testing. the inuit would cewrtainly be raising sh*t about it and we have heard nothing in even the off beat news sources about this.
sorry....ain't true.

They have blown up hundreds of nukes all around the world that YOU would never have known about there is a good movie called the nuke cafe about all the testing they did in space and out in the oceans not to mention the ones in russia you never hear of them.

oldpaganfreak · 12-04-2008, 04:50 AM

whether or not i am aware of all nuclear tests is not the issue. the area in question is in canada. canada is a non-nuclear country. our laws prohibit nukes on canadian soil. that is the issue. we are not talking about the u.s. ot russia and their nuclear programs. we are discussing canada.
the ecidence that supports these nuclear detonations is flimsy at best. there is far more reason to believe that they DID NOT occur that that they did. nine nuke blast in eighteen hours would not go undetected by ALL canadian monitors. this is an area where there is canadian oil exploration. if they DID occur, there would be some canadian confirmation, and hell to pay in parliment.
nukes are illegal on canadian soil. there has never been a nuclear blast in canada. full stop.
from you position in florida, you are hardly in a position to dispute that.

gatestar · 12-01-2008, 05:39 PM

I find the timing interesting...we had two meteorites hit Canada around that time and they seem to come from north going south...also...there has been alot of buzz about major disasters on the west coast..could this be an attempt to trigger a major earthquake?

I remember on the 18th there was a large square at the north pole on the USGS map. I thought this was odd, I live on Vancouver Island so I watch USGS daily.

Connecting with Sauce · 12-01-2008, 05:55 PM

Not sure what they are up to.

I have two possible reasons... the obvious oil one mentioned in the link

or...

If as a recent link here suggested (can't find it now) the planet is actually cooling slightly if red hot magma were to be released underneath the ice it would possibly melt it and keep the global warming / pole caps melting theme going well.

Either way I'm sure it isn't for a good cause... Also I would suggest with the nuclear boring / tunnelling machines they've had since 1995 would have made getting them placed would not take long, as the post above suggests otherwise.

Phil Schneider 1995:
http://educate-yourself.org/products...edescrip.shtml
http://video.google.co.uk/videosearc...b=0&aq=-1&oq=#

RubyTuesday · 12-01-2008, 06:59 PM

HAARP looks VERY interesting on Nov 18th.

http://137.229.36.30/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi

karelia · 12-01-2008, 07:06 PM

There is still no second source confirming it, so I'm leaning towards believing it's not true. See here: http://www.thehollowearthinsider.com/news/index.php

RubyTuesday · 12-01-2008, 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by karelia

There is still no second source confirming it, so I'm leaning towards believing it's not true. See here: http://www.thehollowearthinsider.com/news/index.php

Nice site!

I can't see how it is true, either. Surely we'd see some immediate, major repercussions, no? I lean towards possibly something DID happen (check out HAARP) but not 9 nukes! I just can't imagine not knowing that?

EYES WIDE OPEN · 12-01-2008, 08:13 PM

very pleased to see sceptism here. It was missing when this board first started. very healthy!

KathyT · 12-01-2008, 08:52 PM

What part of "is it true" do you want confirmation on?

That there was something recorded on seismographs? Or that they were nucleur bombs?

The first part IS CONFIRMED.
They are on the USGeological Survey maps here: http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/qed/

Just scroll down to the dates of 11/18 and 11/17 and you'll see ALL nine recorded events. Exact same times, but the magnitude readings are just a wee different, which could be an aspect of coming from different seismographs

I don't know how Zuerrnnovahh-Starr Livingstone would know they were nuclear bombs. I don't know how that can be verified.

It's not uncommon to have a group of smaller earthquakes in the 2.0 and 3. magnitude along fault lines... I know, I live on top of one... but the 4.0+ and 5.0+ magnitudes all at once, that is NOT common. Nor is that area in the Artic a fault line, to my knowledge.

Do I suspect they were inititiated by mankind? Because it's not a normal fault line, and those magnitudes in a pattern are not normal, I kind of think so, YES. Helllloooo!

Now, to a "reason". I suppose it could be going after oil. Another theory is that it could be connected to the entrance at the north pole to a hollow earth. It could be a "inner-earth" vs. a "outer-earth" war event. I've been searching for months to find good aerial photos of both poles, and I think our governments don't want us to know what is at the poles. Those nucleur blasts could be an attempt to "close off" the pole openings... to seal them inside. Well... that's one theory.

joe2288 · 12-01-2008, 08:56 PM

just checked the usgs if there were nukes being blown up than it would show

on the rictor wait nm wrong gragh

Christo888 · 12-01-2008, 08:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KathyT

What part of "is it true" do you want confirmation on?

That there was something recorded on seismographs? Or that they were nucleur bombs?

The first part IS CONFIRMED.
They are on the USGeological Survey maps here: http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/qed/

Just scroll down to the dates of 11/18 and 11/17 and you'll see ALL nine recorded events. Exact same times, but the magnitude readings are just a wee different, which could be an aspect of coming from different seismographs

I don't know how Zuerrnnovahh-Starr Livingstone would know they were nuclear bombs. I don't know how that can be verified.

It's not uncommon to have a group of smaller earthquakes in the 2.0 and 3. magnitude along fault lines... I know, I live on top of one... but the 4.0+ and 5.0+ magnitudes all at once, that is NOT common. Nor is that area in the Artic a fault line, to my knowledge.

Do I suspect they were inititiated by mankind? Because it's not a normal fault line, and those magnitudes in a pattern are not normal, I kind of think so, YES.

Now, to a "reason". I suppose it could be going after oil. Another theory is that it could be connected to the entrance at the north pole to a hollow earth. It could be a "inner-earth" vs. a "outer-earth" war event. I've been searching for months to find good aerial photos of both poles, and I think our governments don't want us to know what is at the poles. Those nucleur blasts could be an attempt to "close off" the pole openings... to seal them inside. Well... that's one theory.

Kathy T ... I like how you think, I have been looking for pics of the poles for 20 years and the only ones I ever found came from one of 'Norval's post! Someone surely doesn't like posting pics of the poles and when they do post are they 'smudged'?

Dantheman62 · 12-01-2008, 09:13 PM

Here's links to pics of poles....http://www.motherplanet.com/satellite-map.htm#POLE http://amazingbeauty.org/a-1-fortune...nature-08.html

Christo888 · 12-01-2008, 09:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dantheman62

Here's a link to pics of poles....http://www.motherplanet.com/satellite-map.htm#POLE

Excuse me... I guess I should have been more specific. I mean real pics of the poles un touched.

Dantheman62 · 12-01-2008, 09:19 PM

oops, sorry, I'm trying!

Christo888 · 12-01-2008, 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dantheman62

oops, sorry, I'm trying!

No worries... it'

s all good.

777 The Great Work · 12-01-2008, 09:59 PM

This is the same hoax as the african pi rates

.(9 in 18 hours is 666. what the hell is an Artic Nuke?

but if we articulate nuke, we get 666 again. Mirrors

The nuke info was released on nov 17 the day of the full moon when human emotions are high and kundalini can be raised. They really hate Lucy.

Those daurn old nukes,i mean dukes causing hazzard again.

12-01-2008, 11:06 AM	#1
The voice of One Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: melbourne, Australia Posts: 29	Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours Please tell me what you make of this... http://educate-yourself.org/zsl/arct...s18nov08.shtml And the Seismic activity going on at the moment... http://www.iris.edu/seismon/ Last edited by Colin; 12-01-2008 at 12:59 PM. Reason: moved smiley to fix link

12-01-2008, 11:47 AM	#2
elsinorelore Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Switzerland Posts: 209	Re: Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours Hey, I find this extremely interesting! If you find out any more, please post it!!! Thanks!!!

12-01-2008, 04:08 PM	#4
Dantheman62 Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: So. Cal. U.S. Posts: 4,205	Re: Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours Nine H-bombs wouldn't be enough to shift the north magnetic pole, it would take alot more than that! If oil was involved than they surely wouldn't let all that money just float away. I would like to see more evidence of the explosions.

12-01-2008, 04:55 PM	#5
Myra Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: So Cal Coast USA Posts: 340	Re: Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours Great. More Radiation floating around. I don't know. Are they trying to circumvent the Magnetic Pole Shift? Whatever they're doing setting off a bunch of Nukes can't be good.

12-01-2008, 05:14 PM	#6
GoingToFast Banned Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Avesta, Sweden. Posts: 303	Re: Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours This page is on my Favorit's list now. http://www.iris.edu/seismon/

12-01-2008, 05:19 PM	#7
Antaletriangle Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: U.K. Posts: 3,380	Re: Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours Interesting info.Thanks for sharing.

12-01-2008, 05:30 PM	#8
oldpaganfreak Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: great northern boreal forest Posts: 440	Re: Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours i'm afraid that i just don't believe this. this report claims that the nukes were expolded on canadian territory. there are inuit settlements near there, as well as conventional oil exploration. just because something is 'claimed to be true' on the net does not make it so. this is certainly an example of that. i have many family and friends employed in oil exploration. blowing 9 nukes could hardly be hidden from us. i would have to see a lot more compelling evidence before i would believe it. canadians have very strong feelings about nuclear testing. the inuit would cewrtainly be raising sh*t about it and we have heard nothing in even the off beat news sources about this. sorry....ain't true.

12-01-2008, 05:40 PM	#9
Antaletriangle Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: U.K. Posts: 3,380	Re: Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours Hey,don't be sorry if it's not true surely it's good news!

12-04-2008, 04:50 AM	#11
oldpaganfreak Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: great northern boreal forest Posts: 440	Re: Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours whether or not i am aware of all nuclear tests is not the issue. the area in question is in canada. canada is a non-nuclear country. our laws prohibit nukes on canadian soil. that is the issue. we are not talking about the u.s. ot russia and their nuclear programs. we are discussing canada. the ecidence that supports these nuclear detonations is flimsy at best. there is far more reason to believe that they DID NOT occur that that they did. nine nuke blast in eighteen hours would not go undetected by ALL canadian monitors. this is an area where there is canadian oil exploration. if they DID occur, there would be some canadian confirmation, and hell to pay in parliment. nukes are illegal on canadian soil. there has never been a nuclear blast in canada. full stop. from you position in florida, you are hardly in a position to dispute that.

12-01-2008, 05:39 PM	#12
gatestar Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Victoria, BC, Canada Posts: 64	Re: Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours I find the timing interesting...we had two meteorites hit Canada around that time and they seem to come from north going south...also...there has been alot of buzz about major disasters on the west coast..could this be an attempt to trigger a major earthquake? I remember on the 18th there was a large square at the north pole on the USGS map. I thought this was odd, I live on Vancouver Island so I watch USGS daily.

12-01-2008, 05:55 PM	#13
Connecting with Sauce Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Chelmsford, Essex Posts: 650	Re: Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours Not sure what they are up to. I have two possible reasons... the obvious oil one mentioned in the link or... If as a recent link here suggested (can't find it now) the planet is actually cooling slightly if red hot magma were to be released underneath the ice it would possibly melt it and keep the global warming / pole caps melting theme going well. Either way I'm sure it isn't for a good cause... Also I would suggest with the nuclear boring / tunnelling machines they've had since 1995 would have made getting them placed would not take long, as the post above suggests otherwise. Phil Schneider 1995: http://educate-yourself.org/products...edescrip.shtml http://video.google.co.uk/videosearc...b=0&aq=-1&oq=#

12-01-2008, 06:59 PM	#14
RubyTuesday Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 224	Re: Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours HAARP looks VERY interesting on Nov 18th. http://137.229.36.30/cgi-bin/magnetometer/gak-mag.cgi

12-01-2008, 07:06 PM	#15
karelia Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Mid-South Posts: 27	Likely a hoax There is still no second source confirming it, so I'm leaning towards believing it's not true. See here: http://www.thehollowearthinsider.com/news/index.php

12-01-2008, 08:13 PM	#17
EYES WIDE OPEN Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Hastings, UK Posts: 424	Re: Likely a hoax very pleased to see sceptism here. It was missing when this board first started. very healthy!

12-01-2008, 08:52 PM	#18
KathyT Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: America Posts: 427	Re: Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours What part of "is it true" do you want confirmation on? That there was something recorded on seismographs? Or that they were nucleur bombs? The first part IS CONFIRMED. They are on the USGeological Survey maps here: http://neic.usgs.gov/neis/qed/ Just scroll down to the dates of 11/18 and 11/17 and you'll see ALL nine recorded events. Exact same times, but the magnitude readings are just a wee different, which could be an aspect of coming from different seismographs I don't know how Zuerrnnovahh-Starr Livingstone would know they were nuclear bombs. I don't know how that can be verified. It's not uncommon to have a group of smaller earthquakes in the 2.0 and 3. magnitude along fault lines... I know, I live on top of one... but the 4.0+ and 5.0+ magnitudes all at once, that is NOT common. Nor is that area in the Artic a fault line, to my knowledge. Do I suspect they were inititiated by mankind? Because it's not a normal fault line, and those magnitudes in a pattern are not normal, I kind of think so, YES. Helllloooo! Now, to a "reason". I suppose it could be going after oil. Another theory is that it could be connected to the entrance at the north pole to a hollow earth. It could be a "inner-earth" vs. a "outer-earth" war event. I've been searching for months to find good aerial photos of both poles, and I think our governments don't want us to know what is at the poles. Those nucleur blasts could be an attempt to "close off" the pole openings... to seal them inside. Well... that's one theory. Last edited by KathyT; 12-01-2008 at 09:49 PM.

12-01-2008, 08:56 PM	#19
joe2288 Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Illinois USA Posts: 652	Re: Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours just checked the usgs if there were nukes being blown up than it would show on the rictor wait nm wrong gragh Last edited by joe2288; 12-01-2008 at 08:59 PM.

12-01-2008, 09:13 PM	#21
Dantheman62 Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: So. Cal. U.S. Posts: 4,205	Re: Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours Here's links to pics of poles....http://www.motherplanet.com/satellite-map.htm#POLE http://amazingbeauty.org/a-1-fortune...nature-08.html Last edited by Dantheman62; 12-01-2008 at 09:17 PM.

12-01-2008, 09:19 PM	#23
Dantheman62 Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: So. Cal. U.S. Posts: 4,205	Re: Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours oops, sorry, I'm trying!

12-01-2008, 09:59 PM	#25
777 The Great Work Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: At the doors of perception Posts: 2,135	Re: Nine Arctic Nukes Exploded in Eighteen Hours This is the same hoax as the african pi rates .(9 in 18 hours is 666. what the hell is an Artic Nuke?but if we articulate nuke, we get 666 again. Mirrors The nuke info was released on nov 17 the day of the full moon when human emotions are high and kundalini can be raised. They really hate Lucy. Those daurn old nukes,i mean dukes causing hazzard again. Last edited by 777 The Great Work; 12-02-2008 at 12:46 AM.