The Maria Number Matrix of the 33-Summation-Tier

[abraxasinas]

http://tonyb.freeyellow.com/id197.html (as I have not yet figured out IF and how this browser here would print indices (exponents) some of the mathematical detail below is basically unreadable - I apologize for this A.)

The 'Perennial Philosophy' or the 'Wisdom of the Ancients' often points to what is commonly termed as 'Sacred Geometry', based on the Platonic Solids (of five regular polyhedra: Tetrahedron, Cube; Octahedron; Dodecahedron and Icosahedron) and the Tetraktys of Pythagoras (for the minimum mathematical points to define the four dimensions of 0D=1 Point; 1D=2 Points for a Line; 2D=3 Points for a Plane and 3D= 4 Points for a Space).
Also invoked is the pentagonal supersymmetry of quasiperiodicity as 'Nature's Preferred maximisation of 'packing efficiency' known as the Fibonacci Series and the 'Perfect Numbers' of Euclid and the 'Harmony of Numbers and the Spheres' of Pythagoras, Leonardo da Vinci and Kepler.

In Pythagoraen Numerology, the 'masternumbers' 11, 22 and 33 are often emphasised and this post shall introduce some relatively rigorous number theory (of the so called 'pure' mathematics) to validate the significance of the 'masternumbers' from frst principles.
The alphanumeracy of the Arabic-Hebrew semiotiks then is bounded in say 22 or 26 letters of alphabets, which can attain numerical values in the decad of three triplicities:
Round or Curved 'Mental Numbers' {3-6-9} characterised by masternumber 33;
Mixed or Discontinuous 'Emotional Numbers' {2-5-8} characterised by masternumber 22 and
Linear or Straight 'Physical Numbers' {1-4-7} characterised by masternumber 11.


The Maria-Code in the Riemann Analysis specifies the partitioning of the decimal monad around the primary Maria-Number and SEps-Constant '11'.
This generates the Prime Number Algorithm: +1+11+10+11 as 33-tiered segments, which transform the mechanics of SEps into the 64-codex of the DNA/RNA code for its eventual quadrupling as the 256-codex incorporative of dormant intron/intein codings.

The Maria-Code is based on the distribution of the Maria-Numbers (MN)given by:
M(p)+99=M(p+12); n=[√(264k+1)-1]/2 by n2+n-66k=0.
Maria Numbers are those IntegerCounts, which contain all previously counted integers as mod33.
Example: 1+2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9+10+11=66 = 2x33 → '11' is MN#1 for k=2 11love65use110love164use209love263use......Archety pe 2 (rootreductive) 21use66love120use165love219use264love......Archety pe 3 (rootreductive) 32use77love131use176love230use275love......Archety pe 5 (rootreductive) 33love87use132love186use231love285use......Archety pe 6 (rootreductive) 44love98use143love197use242love296use......Archety pe 8 (rootreductive) 54use99love153use198love252use297love......Archety pe 9 (rootreductive) 65use110love164use209love263use308love....Archetyp e 2*... ... ... ...

Archetypes 2+3+5+6+8+9=33 and Archetypes 1+4+7+0=12 then define the imaginary time-dimensions as the archetypes not in the Sequence for Eps=1/e* Coefficients used in the application of the seven fundamental principalities to define the F-Space.
We have used the (Hebrew-Isaac-encoding): 54=LOVE=12+15+22+5 with 45=USE=21+19+5; USELOVE=99 as the Maria-Code connectors.
The first 10 MN's are: 11, 21, 32, 33, 44, 54, 65, 66, 77 and 87.
One can use the Maria-Code to establish a redefinition of infinity by defining a transfinite mapping Aleph-All from 12D-Omnispace as Cantorian transform of Cardinality Aleph-Null.
Limit (T(n)) for n→Infinity = Infinity {Cantor Cardinality Aleph-Null}
Limit (T(n)) for n→X = 1 {Cantor Cardinality Aleph-All}

This maps the Riemann pole about z=1 in the Functional-Riemann-Bound (FRB=-1/2) in the gaussian universal wavefunction B(n)=(2e/hA).exp(-Alpha.T(n)), T(n)=n(n+1) as the Feynman-Path-Integral. This becomes the Riemann-Euler-Harmonic, defining the Gamma-Function geometrically in its nth Term T and nth Sum S and mapping the factotrial function onto the positive integer count: Tk(En) = nk.Tk(En-1) + [(n-1)!]k and Sk(En) = Tk(En)/(n!)k
This uses the Harmonic Series in the Zeta-Function ζ(z) with constant p.
The Sum (1 to Infinity) Σ(1/np)= 1/1p+1/2p+1/3p+...+1/np and converges for any p>1, since for even terms: 2.2-p ≥ 2-p+3-p, with geometric series 11-p+21-p+41-p+...summing to
(1-2[1-p]^n)/(1-21-p)=1/[1-21-p] in the limit for n→Infinity.

Since every Maria Number contains all numbers before it as a sum, it is given that all the prime numbers must eventually crystallise out of the Maria Count.
Define a general number count n and a 'Mersenne-Count' 8n-1=M*.
For a number to be prime this number must be born in the Maria Code.
M* is either a prime or a product of primes in the immediate neighbourhood of the count # or its mapping to M*, which in a sense 'counts' the primes it generates.
This is the finestructure as octaves derived from integer n.
To test a number for primeness, so amounts to a testing for Marianess.
If the number is a member of the Maria-Matrix, then it must be denumerable in the form of M*.

This is the meaning behind the Mersenne-Code (for n prime) M(p)=2p-1 and the Fermat-Code F(n)=22^n+1 and the 'Perfect Numbers' depicted as the Mersenne Numbers (Mp), as a subset of M*.
For the Mersenne Numbers, the exponent p is defined to be prime.
M2=22-1=3; M3=23-1=7; M5=25-1=31; M7=27-1=127; M11=211-1=2047=23x89 and so is not a Mersenne Prime - yet M13=213-1=8191; M17=217-1=131,071;
M19=219-1=524,287 are prime and M23=223-1=8,388,607=47x178,481 and
M29=229-1=536,870,911=233x1103x2089 are not and M31=231-1=2,147,483,647 is prime again in the 33-tier count.

The 'uniqueness' of the prime number 11 (and esoteric masternumber) recrystallizes in Mersenne primes as the (first) 'odd one out'.
But it gets better. First we notice that there are just five 'perfect Fermat Primes'.
F0=21+1=3; F1=22+1=5; F2=24+1=17; F3=28+1=257 and F4=216+1=65,537 are all 'perfect' Fermat Primes, but F5=232+1=4,294,967,297=641x6,700,417 and following are not. Only these five Fermat primes are known to date.


From wiki:
Euclid discovered that the first four perfect numbers are generated by the formula 2p-1(2p - 1):
for p = 2: 21(22 - 1) = 6 for p = 3: 22(23 - 1) = 28 for p = 5: 24(25 - 1) = 496 for p = 7: 26(27 - 1) = 8128. Noticing that 2p - 1 is a prime number in each instance, Euclid proved that the formula 2p-1(2p - 1) gives an even perfect number whenever 2p - 1 is prime (Euclid, Prop. IX.36).


Ancient mathematicians made many assumptions about perfect numbers based on the four they knew, but most of those assumptions would later prove to be incorrect. One of these assumptions was that since 2, 3, 5, and 7 are precisely the first four primes, the fifth perfect number would be obtained when p = 11, the fifth prime. However, 211 - 1 = 2047 = 23 × 89 is not prime and therefore p = 11 does not yield a perfect number. Two other wrong assumptions were:

• The fifth perfect number would have five digits in base 10 since the first four had 1, 2, 3, and 4 digits respectively.
• The perfect numbers' final digits would go 6, 8, 6, 8, alternately.

The fifth perfect number (33550336 = 212(213 - 1)) has 8 digits, thus refuting the first assumption. For the second assumption, the fifth perfect number indeed ends with a 6. However, the sixth (8 589 869 056) also ends in a 6. It is straightforward to show that the last digit of any even perfect number must be 6 (when p = 2 or 4k+1) or 8 (when p = 4k-1).
In order for 2p - 1 to be prime, it is necessary but not sufficient that p should be prime. Prime numbers of the form 2p - 1 are known as Mersenne primes, after the seventeenth-century monk Marin Mersenne, who studied number theory and perfect numbers."(end wiki)

The 'Perfect Numbers' relate (for prime p) as 2p-1.Mp :
P2=21.(22-1)=6=1+2+3=1x2x3;
P3=22.(23-1)=28=1+2+3+4+5+6+7=[7x8]/2=4x7=13+33=1+27;
P5=24.(25-1)=496=1+2+3+...+30+31=[31x32]/2 =16x31=13+33+53+73=1+27+125+343;
P6=26.(27-1)=8128=1+2+3+...+126+127=[127x128]/2=13+33+53+73+93+113+133+153

All 'Perfect Numbers' so are EVEN (it is hitherto unknown if any ODD 'Perfect Numbers' exist); and EXCEPT the basic 'First Perfect Number' 6=1+2+3=1x2x3, they all are the sums of the ODD NUMBERS CUBED.

Abraxasinas

[redtailhawk]

Hi,

Thanks for sharing. This is the first time I have heard about the "Maria Number Matrix..." Does this formula somehow make the name "Maria", sacred or significant? Just curious.

[abraxasinas]

Originally Posted by redtailhawk

Hi,

Thanks for sharing. This is the first time I have heard about the "Maria Number Matrix..." Does this formula somehow make the name "Maria", sacred or significant? Just curious.

Hi redtailhawk!

The name Maria is a common name as are many others, but exhibits a potent archetypical association with symbols and linguistics.
Maria or Mary or Miriam relates to the 'cosmic motherhood' and the universal womb in Maria- the ChristMother and as Mare or Meer (German) symbolising the Great Sea and in alphanumerical encoding:
MARIA=13+1+18+9+1=42.

42 then becomes 'popularised' by Douglas Adams in the 'Hitchhikers Guide to the Galaxy' as the answer to the universe, life and everything.

42 in physics becomes an important ratio between dimensionless finestructure constants Alpha (in Electromagnetism Alpha=2pike^2/hc~1/137) and in Omega (in Gravitation between 2 electrons Omega=2piGm^2/hc~2x10^-45) for Alpha/Omega~4x10^42.

The reason as to why any search for the Maria Code will not lead you to references (except myself) is just that. I discovered this code and it has not yet been incorporated in the common global database.
But the mathematics is self evident and I have not sought any 'credit for its discovery, simply because I am engaged in a 'deeper' agenda, which requires my relative anonymity.

The poem below was also composed by me and as an expression of honour for this name Maria also applicable to ANY Mother or Mother to Be as an ambassadora for the Mother of All - the Goddess of Creation called Universe.





The Wings of Maria and Solomon's Song !

A new day is breaking across the plains of the desert, Maria's golden dawn to greet;
like a lush green meadow, Bathsheba is awaiting the dewdrops, deliciously sweet.
It's Solomon's flowery nectar, growing in a valley of memories forgotten for so long;
where a beautiful song is playing, birthing a new world for our sweet Maria to belong.

Out in the dry desert, a caravan of camels paces steadily towards its vermilion oasis;
a mighty rock, telling its tales of old, when wisdom still was found in hidden places.
Baiame, the serpent's rainbow is arching across a glorious sky, shining in hues azure;
and there's Maria, a flower from the desert with her love to share so gently and demure.

Merlin, the crimson dingo has come to the great meet, with stories of a redrosy sky;
so many desertdwellers to share in adventures, hearing a majestic eagle's eerie cry.
Amidst the gathering is our queen, dancing to the mother's calling, love's own tune;
What a celebration at the edge of nowhere, this wedding betwixt the sun and the moon.

Jonathan, the emu has arrived with a message about Maria from the heavens above;
the dragon's friends are found all about, guided in the peace of the snowwhite dove.
There is Toby, the alabaster unicorn, pacing for Maria's mounting and to elope away;
into a realm of lofty mountains, where the regal eagle's loveplay always holds sway.

Excalibur, the sword of truth has broken forth to swiftly rent the veils holding asunder;
a mighty tempest sweeps across a forlorn land, a world shaken in lightning and thunder.
Maria's dreams of love and sublime desires, all have sprouted upon Pegasusian wings;
from the heights of peaky treetops and of oaken branches, where the nightingale sings.


You pretty pink flamingo, wading by across the shores of longings, bubbling all adrift;
if you'd just fathom the inner essence of your glory, your ecstacy would come so swift.
Upon the wings of Solomon, you shall find the Dragon's daughter's passage to be free;
oh sweet remembrance of the days of old, Maria of Jerusalem has found her lost key.

The name of the Mother's poem is your own; your courting troubadour so fit to see;
a dawning of love's joy in all is splendour, so devoted and wondrously in wait for thee!


{Composed by the tripartite One: Logan Antico of Arndale; Robert Sceptico of Jones and Tony WhyNot}

Abraxasinas

[redtailhawk]

Abraxasinas,

Your poem is most beautiful, thank you for sharing it.

I will confess that my name is Maria; but I have never identified with it. My great grandmother's name was Mary, and we are not Latin, but Celtic. I am not a mother either.

I checked out your (?) site that the information on the Maria Number Matrix came from and it was most interesting. I am most interested in the science and physics when it comes to better understanding the "reality" we live in.

Cheers.

[abraxasinas]

Originally Posted by redtailhawk

Abraxasinas,

Your poem is most beautiful, thank you for sharing it.

I will confess that my name is Maria; but I have never identified with it. My great grandmother's name was Mary, and we are not Latin, but Celtic. I am not a mother either.

I checked out your (?) site that the information on the Maria Number Matrix came from and it was most interesting. I am most interested in the science and physics when it comes to better understanding the "reality" we live in.

Cheers.

Hi Maria!

Just a short note. Part of the 'Grand Unification' and Metamorphosis of the Human Caterpillar into a StarHuman Butterfly of LoveJoy is the 'androgynization' of the present human DNA template.

This requires any man to MANIFEST his 'female shadow' say and vice versa requires any woman to realise her 'male shadow'.
This then will pacify 'the sexes' in that everyone so 'metamorphosed' (the new creation in scripture and scrolls of divers kinds) will become 'doubled' in a 'Natural Bisexual' SelfUnification (to do with DNA/RNA extension-coupling).

Now this journey is all to do with 'individualizations' and is intimately personal.
Suffice to say, that my progress in this regards engages a DISINCARNATE 'soul' called Maria.
Iow I am Maria in a twinsoul alignment. I have named my 'mathematical discovery' in HER honour, but this also applies to ALL woman, daughters, mothers, granddaughters and so on.
Here is another poem which accentuates this.

DE MORTUIS NIL NISI BONUM
{Speak Nothing but Good of the Dead}

Out in the graveyard;
inscriptions, words and plaques, all withering away;
like the flowers adorning them, so the dead do lay.
Waiting and waiting for someone to remember them
and not just in photoalbums or on the special days.

Memorials are built, meaningless constructions - lest we forget!
They all are forgotten, given time enough to sigh, to pass away.
The living are so busy preparing for their own demise, to die.
Little do they know, the busy ones, that the dead are still alive.

They watch over the living ones, they do, from a place so far;
yet so near they are, but why would they watch the way they do?
To understand the mystery is the noble thing to do - a gallant quest.
They wish to be remembered, to join in soul and mind , the body's zest.

A marriage betwixt the dimensions, a holy union in heaven with hell.
But can the fearful thoughts of the living see, their lovehearts tell?
The living are like snowflakes, made of water, so unique one by one.
But they melt away, to be fluid again - into the one great ocean, gone!

The dead are all one in the great seas, waiting to crystallise again in two.
To wake up to a new life again, as a snowflake-twin, asking: 'Love me too!'
Eternal life awaits the living, could they only reply to the dead's request.
But the alive ones linger and doubt, in vanity do they live their only quest.

SIC TRANSIT GLORIA MUNDI
{Thus passes away the glory of the world}

WhynoT

[redtailhawk]

WOW, Abraxasinas!

Your poem is so significant, you have no idea! I have done A LOT of work/research in the area of survival of consciousness....My mentor on the "other side" is John....check out his picture which was taken 3 months before he was killed; I uploaded it before I read your latest post... I will e-mail you privately who he is, you will know his name.

[abraxasinas]

Originally Posted by redtailhawk

WOW, Abraxasinas!

Your poem is so significant, you have no idea! I have done A LOT of work/research in the area of survival of consciousness....My mentor on the "other side" is John....check out his picture which was taken 3 months before he was killed; I uploaded it before I read your latest post... I will e-mail you privately who he is, you will know his name.

I am glad to have been able to be of assistance Maria.
I had a look at John sitting in the Sun and yes he can interact with you if you open your mental perceptions. All of the disincarnates are very potent in their consciousness, but require the RECEPTORS activated in the minds of incarnates.
So Love and Desire to BE with them is the easiest way.
It's a much more potent interaction than say cybersex - it actually is the Tantra of the Divine.

John Shadow aka Abraxasinas aka ?not


The Presence of the Mosaic implies the will of Unity=God=Starhumanity and not the will of Humanity=Man=Separation!

FUTURE SHADOWS OF THE PAST

"A most wondrous thing the Shadow is, a redeemer in all to succour;
it can go where the light cannot abide, seemingly banished, it is not.
For where the light is, the darkness flees, no longer present to endure;
so to become illuminated is its destined journey and its troubled lot.

But without the light, no Shadow can be cast, its such a splendid key;
the dimensions reduce in space from three to two and all in just the one.
Betwixt the light and the darkness it is and part of both for all to see;
the Shadow of the body, does it not merge all in its rule under the sun?

Whatsoever can cast a Shadow, must be a most wondrous thing to relay;
as nature's very own offspring, the young ones grow towards their final goal.
Enabled to bring peace to so many things appearing apart and so far away;
the reconciliation for the suffering body with its spirit and its scattered soul."

http://tonyb.freeyellow.com and http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/quantumrelativity
omniphysics@cosmosdawn.net

[redtailhawk]

Thanks, I e-mailed you privately. Indeed, I know much about the shadow...was just discussing the topic with some wise friends on Christmas. So many "New Agers" want to focus on only "Love & Light", when true integration must be balanced with the embracing of the Shadow.

[THE eXchanger]

Originally Posted by redtailhawk

Thanks, I e-mailed you privately. Indeed, I know much about the shadow...was just discussing the topic with some wise friends on Christmas. So many "New Agers" want to focus on only "Love & Light", when true integration must be balanced with the embracing of the Shadow.

you must dance with the shadow !!! that iS a truth

[THE eXchanger]

The only 'whyNOT' is a choice that rests within the choi_seer !!!

We just talked about caterpillars/and, butterflys on another thread

33 is an important number ~ very old & large diamonds were faceted to 33

esp. the oval ones

[THE eXchanger]

The energetic eXpression
of an original spark ~ contains 3 aspects
that can become split from the original source

when split the earth 'susan-74/11" becomes
male 38 / female 62
whilst the higher self/essence and monad
is direct opposite of male 62/female 38

(ratios will always add up to 100)

that is a good way to know, you are blending with the right one

also ~ the energy ratio male / and, female
does NOT mean you are more masculine / or feminine in nature

[THE eXchanger]

A good article on that, this this one by
Male/Female Energy Ratio

BY SHEPHERD HOODWIN www.summerjoy.com


Each soul has a certain percentage of male energy and female energy, regardless of the gender of the physical body.

For example, a man or a woman might have thirty-three percent male energy/sixty-seven percent female energy.

The exact complement is a partner with a ratio of sixty-seven/thirty-three. All else being equal, you have more balancing sex with someone whose male/female energy ratio complements yours. Finding balance, of course, is very satisfying, but you might still be satisfied with a partner whose ratio does not balance yours.

Male energy is directed, focused, goal-oriented, productive, and outward-thrusting or positive-charged (as in a magnet). It corresponds with linear, left-brained thinking, and with doing. Its positive pole (as I channeled it) is exertion and penetration; its negative pole is intrusion.

Female energy is creative, process-oriented, unstructured, and inward-drawing or negative-charged. It corresponds with circular, right-brained thinking, and with being. Its positive pole is expansion and generation; its negative pole is chaotic destruction. Female energy conditions the environment, whereas male energy structures it.

The male body is designed to put male energy forward, and the female body is designed to put female energy forward, so there is a masculinity just from being in a male body, even when the soul is high in female energy, and vice versa. All else being equal, a man with seventy-five percent male energy is more focused and has more “drive” (not necessarily inappropriately) than a man with forty-five percent male energy, because there is more male energy there to put forward. Of course, the reverse is true regarding female energy and women.

Our male/female energy ratio remains constant from lifetime to lifetime. Although there are those who have a very high percentage of either male or female energy, most of my clients are fairly balanced in their male/female energy ratio, having no less than about thirty percent of each, making it easier to have a fairly complete experience of both sides of the creative process on earth. However, I’ve never run into anyone having precisely fifty percent of each. This suggests that our essence almost always likes to have at least a slight emphasis one way or another. Perhaps this is because a little imbalance promotes movement; a ratio of exactly fifty/fifty could create an internal stalemate. However, the universe itself contains a balance of male and female energies.

I sense a subtle “shift” when crossing the line from forty-nine/fifty-one to fifty-one/forty-nine. In other words, it is significant which energy is dominant, even if that dominance is slight in terms of percentage. This doesn’t imply, however, that if female energy is dominant, one is a female soul, or vice versa; the soul is without gender.

Male/female energy ratio has little to do with societal concepts about masculinity and femininity. Male energy is defined as how much of the soul's energy is goal-directed (focused in outer world productivity) and how much is process-oriented (more concerned with generating inner world atmosphere and possibility). A man can be masculine, in terms of how most Americans think of it, and have higher female energy--he will likely be more laid back and less career-oriented than if he had higher male energy. Warriors and kings are action-oriented by nature, so even a high female-energy warrior or king will need to be productive. It can hard to differentiate the focus of male energy and the action orientation of warriors and kings. Higher female energy suggests that the warrior or king will be more inclined to be productive in a lot of different directions, such as in puttering around the house, whereas higher male energy suggest more focus on one project in the outer world.

Warriors and kings have more trouble with their feminine sides, although they can be just as feminine as anyone else, in the true sense of the word--it just doesn't look like our society's picture of that, and if they are trying to conform to it unsuccessfully, they will reject it.

People with very high male energy tend to be workaholics, to the exclusion of the more internal and home aspects of life.

Having high male energy doesn't necessarily look like our culture's definition of masculinity. One can be gentle and sweet and have high male energy. In general, the expression and inspiration roles look more feminine, so a higher male energy priest might look less masculine than a higher female energy warrior, according to our societal stereotypes. Imprinting also plays a part in how someone looks. The ratio specifically applies to the extent to which one's energy is directed. There is a subtle feeling about these energies that you pick up after a while that is different from our stereotypes; for me, it is like an emanation from our center that is focused to a varying extent, like a piece of pie that can be narrow (more male energy) or wide (more female energy). Theoretically, total female energy is radiant in all directions at once, and total male energy is laser beam-like, completely focused, but we are all a blend of these two to some extent. Someone not being career oriented because he wanted time to write could still be validation of higher male energy if his true career was his writing, and he was focusing himself in that one direction when he could. He might be at home but directing his energies out of the home through his writing--his actions were not home-oriented.

Priests have a paradox, in that they are very powerful and concentrated in a fluid (feminine) way, yet our culture has assigned the concept of power to the masculine.

In a male body, the male energy is usually forward--the lessons are predominantly about male energy, no matter how much there is. Also, imprinting can affect how that manifests.

(We do NOT agree with that statement marked *)

*Many people are at least somewhat bisexual, and everyone can at least receive sensual pleasure from either gender; perhaps true bisexuality might be defined as the ability to be orgasmic with either sex. One Michael channel I trust got that 100% of females and 25% of males are bisexual, although I'm not sure how that was defined there. It depends partly on the role and male/female energy ratio of the soul and its past-life frequency of being either male or female, plus imprinting.

Exchanger's comment: We believe, that between Original Spark / & The Higher Self/Essence/and, Monad
that it carrys a balanced divine male / and, divine female energetic ratio 62/38 and, 38/62, at least, for us

[abraxasinas]

Originally Posted by THE eXchanger

A good article on that, this this one by
Male/Female Energy Ratio

...
In a male body, the male energy is usually forward--the lessons are predominantly about male energy, no matter how much there is. Also, imprinting can affect how that manifests.

(We do NOT agree with that statement marked *)

*Many people are at least somewhat bisexual, and everyone can at least receive sensual pleasure from either gender; perhaps true bisexuality might be defined as the ability to be orgasmic with either sex. One Michael channel I trust got that 100% of females and 25% of males are bisexual, although I'm not sure how that was defined there. It depends partly on the role and male/female energy ratio of the soul and its past-life frequency of being either male or female, plus imprinting.

Exchanger's comment: We believe, that between Original Spark / & The Higher Self/Essence/and, Monad
that it carrys a balanced divine male / and, divine female energetic ratio 62/38 and, 38/62, at least, for us

The 'battle of the sexes' is well addressed by your reference. The shadow in a man is feminine and so can easily become sexually attracted to the masculine and vice versa for a woman.
This natural bisexuality then either becomes suppressed on moral-religious-cultural grounds Or becomes expressed in homosexuality, transdrerssing and similar PHYSICAL manifestations of what is really a MENTAL self-definition.

More scientifically, it can be shown that the XX sexchromosmatic function of a female is actually X1X2 and the males XY is really a XoY.
So the sexchromosomes of the mother are different, one of the X's being a 'disguised' Y.
This then, under appropriate analysis, can indicate that the 'true' higherD DNA/RNA derives from a perfect symmetry in YX-XY (resulting in the decoupling in the Eve out of Adam archetype of a prior 'perfect' AdamEve bisexual prototype.
But 'God' as ONE AdamEve could NOT sexually express ITSELF and so the Yin-Yang bifurcation (and with it the birth of the universe) became necessity.

ALPHA=BRIDE=38 and I so agree with your 38+62=100 percentage distribution alphanumerically.
GROOM=68=62+1+2+3 and INFINITY=106=BRIDEGROOM=Bride+GROOM in a play with words.

INFINITY=CIRCLE+6+CIRCLE, wit 6=1+2+3=1x2x3 the first Perfect Number.

Abraxasinas

[THE eXchanger]

your codes are accurate ~ even Stuart Wilde, talked about the 33 steps ~ back in the 70's or 80's

33 steps beyond the earth plane

we utilised 33 steps to Mill Mastery

as, well, as, circum ferre 360

[redtailhawk]

Originally Posted by THE eXchanger

Your codes, are accurate ~ even Stuart Wilde,
talked about the 33 steps ~ back in the 70's or 80's

33 steps beyond the earth plane

we utilised 33 steps to Mill Mastery

as, well, as, circum ferre 360

I am confused by these codes, is there a formula that you can teach us? Or do I need to be advanced in math?

[THE eXchanger]

Originally Posted by redtailhawk

I am confused by these codes, is there a formula that you can teach us? Or do I need to be advanced in math?

everything is related/and, can be eXpressed in mathematical relations
~some of which, are ancient in origin