Zacharia Sitchin is wrong

Brinty · 04-12-2009, 09:34 PM

Egg, all I can say in support of your post is :

With a few,

And

thrown in in addition to your comments.

Ashatav · 04-12-2009, 11:11 PM

I comented to a scholar familiar about sichin and that familiar looked at me, like condescending, and told me that him and the other famous guy (don't remember his name) are like the guys who have less credibility and less scientific prooves in the scientific community.

Like: Trash them, are just a bunch of misplaced inventions contradicting years of studies based in fact and with Enormeous holes in their "discoveries/inventions".

And actually Zagami says that Sitchin is an illuminist.

so.......

Im doing an "article" about the alien agenda, will be very interesting!

Cheers!

04-13-2009, 01:57 AM

First off, everyone is entitled to their opinion, no matter what! Its a bunch of hogwash this guy is trying to ask! Does the dude have any answers to some of the questions he asks? Its like asking, why did the chicken cross the road? etc. He is basically trying to make a name for himself at the expense of another! What can he gain by it?

Sitchin brought an unprecedented awarenes to the whole Sumerian account of the Annunaki etc. Nobody said he is 100% right, some of his theories i don't agree with, but The facts are there. From our dna to the cuneiform tablets, ruins and relics in iraq and other places, to the whole solar system. The ptb's know this and don't want us to piece the whole story together! or it will crumble to pieces the whole illusionary infrastructure the've put in place! from religion to politics, basically our whole reality of things!

Lorien · 04-13-2009, 02:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brinty

Egg, all I can say in support of your post is :

With a few,

And

thrown in in addition to your comments.

Wow, that's real mature. How old are we Brinty?

Brinty · 04-13-2009, 03:52 AM

I don't know your age Lorien, but I'm a happy-go-lucky 72 year old who can (and does) laugh at people who get up tight about theories different from their own.

As has been pointed out on this and other threads, Sitchin can not, and is not, right with every one of his theories. Nobody is that perfect - even God cocked things up when he created man. Oh, I forgot, that was the Anunnaki wasn't it?

Supposing that Sitchin was wrong and all his theories are just so much BS, there are an awful lot of people now taking an interest in ancient history. Maybe the truth of humanity's origins are somewhere between the Biblical account, and Sitchins.

But for myself, Sitchin has made the Biblical story believable to me as he opened my eyes and mind to a different way of thinking. If his writings can achieve that for thousands of folk, then it has to be an improvement on just blind acceptance of the impossible sounding story in Genesis.

Lorien · 04-13-2009, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Brinty

I don't know your age Lorien, but I'm a happy-go-lucky 72 year old who can (and does) laugh at people who get up tight about theories different from their own.

As has been pointed out on this and other threads, Sitchin can not, and is not, right with every one of his theories. Nobody is that perfect - even God cocked things up when he created man. Oh, I forgot, that was the Anunnaki wasn't it?

Supposing that Sitchin was wrong and all his theories are just so much BS, there are an awful lot of people now taking an interest in ancient history. Maybe the truth of humanity's origins are somewhere between the Biblical account, and Sitchins.

But for myself, Sitchin has made the Biblical story believable to me as he opened my eyes and mind to a different way of thinking. If his writings can achieve that for thousands of folk, then it has to be an improvement on just blind acceptance of the impossible sounding story in Genesis.

I wasn't getting uptight. Egg was the one who decided to attack my point of view for no reason. I just thought it was a bit immature to say "add in" your little faces basically making fun of me like a 5 year old would. It's just immature and unwarranted. But I digress.....

firefly · 04-13-2009, 05:09 AM

Frankly, I found the sight 'Zecharia Sitchin is Wrong' to be quite interesting. And Dr.Mike Heiser is offering some challenging material. Sorry folks. but I could never really get around Sitchin's theories. But of course everyone to their own.

Love and friendship
firefly

04-12-2009, 09:34 PM	#1
Brinty Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Blackbutt, Queensland, Australia Posts: 1,004	Re: Zacharia Sitchin is wrong Egg, all I can say in support of your post is : With a few, And thrown in in addition to your comments.

04-12-2009, 11:11 PM	#2
Ashatav Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Posts: 603	Re: Zacharia Sitchin is wrong I comented to a scholar familiar about sichin and that familiar looked at me, like condescending, and told me that him and the other famous guy (don't remember his name) are like the guys who have less credibility and less scientific prooves in the scientific community. Like: Trash them, are just a bunch of misplaced inventions contradicting years of studies based in fact and with Enormeous holes in their "discoveries/inventions". And actually Zagami says that Sitchin is an illuminist. so....... Im doing an "article" about the alien agenda, will be very interesting! Cheers!

04-13-2009, 01:57 AM	#3
Nebula Guest Posts: n/a	Re: Zacharia Sitchin is wrong First off, everyone is entitled to their opinion, no matter what! Its a bunch of hogwash this guy is trying to ask! Does the dude have any answers to some of the questions he asks? Its like asking, why did the chicken cross the road? etc. He is basically trying to make a name for himself at the expense of another! What can he gain by it? Sitchin brought an unprecedented awarenes to the whole Sumerian account of the Annunaki etc. Nobody said he is 100% right, some of his theories i don't agree with, but The facts are there. From our dna to the cuneiform tablets, ruins and relics in iraq and other places, to the whole solar system. The ptb's know this and don't want us to piece the whole story together! or it will crumble to pieces the whole illusionary infrastructure the've put in place! from religion to politics, basically our whole reality of things! Last edited by Nebula; 04-13-2009 at 02:23 AM.

04-13-2009, 03:52 AM	#5
Brinty Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Blackbutt, Queensland, Australia Posts: 1,004	Re: Zacharia Sitchin is wrong I don't know your age Lorien, but I'm a happy-go-lucky 72 year old who can (and does) laugh at people who get up tight about theories different from their own. As has been pointed out on this and other threads, Sitchin can not, and is not, right with every one of his theories. Nobody is that perfect - even God cocked things up when he created man. Oh, I forgot, that was the Anunnaki wasn't it? Supposing that Sitchin was wrong and all his theories are just so much BS, there are an awful lot of people now taking an interest in ancient history. Maybe the truth of humanity's origins are somewhere between the Biblical account, and Sitchins. But for myself, Sitchin has made the Biblical story believable to me as he opened my eyes and mind to a different way of thinking. If his writings can achieve that for thousands of folk, then it has to be an improvement on just blind acceptance of the impossible sounding story in Genesis.

04-13-2009, 05:09 AM	#7
firefly Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Byron Bay Australia Posts: 79	Re: Zacharia Sitchin is wrong Frankly, I found the sight 'Zecharia Sitchin is Wrong' to be quite interesting. And Dr.Mike Heiser is offering some challenging material. Sorry folks. but I could never really get around Sitchin's theories. But of course everyone to their own. Love and friendship firefly