|
|
|
|
|
#1 | |
|
Project Avalon Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northeastern Brazil
Posts: 1,259
|
Hi carriblu,
You make a very valid point. However, others found water on the Moon before NASA: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle6846639.ece http://planetarysocietyindia.blogspo...o%20hit%20moon I think there may have been an ulterior motive for NASA tosend an impacting rocket to the Moon, perhaps to say to the others (India / Japan) to keep away? Could it be a ruse to test another Star Wars weapon? Was this the real reason of the dissappointment of Missio Control when there wasn't a 'boom' when the missile hit? Best regards, Steve Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: england
Posts: 1,153
|
all announcements and information are carefully crafted for public consumption. nasa is just an occult ceremonial entity. they have known everything for at least 60 years prob more.
this is all to do with timing for disclosure for their benefit not ours.. disclosure woill be part of the nwo agenda or they wouldnt be doing it.. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: ∞
Posts: 654
|
Heres another article from TheRegister:
Quote:
Quote:
So in other words, as usual, I'm just gonna have to take NASA's word for it that this planet is supposedly yet another "inhospitable" environment. Isn't anyone tired of hearing that nonsense? It is highly unlikely that out of all the planets discovered so far, whether exoplanets or planets in our own solar system, it is doubtful ALL of them are "inhospitable" as such. My opinion has always been that almost every planet and moon, even in our solar system, are inhabited by some form of life, at least primitive life. So maybe these "scientists" should start pulling their head out of the jar, reevaluate their calculations, and stop trusting NASA merely at their word. Last edited by Majorion; 12-17-2009 at 01:24 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: ∞
Posts: 654
|
Quote:
Since its very inception, NASA is not and has never been a civilian science agency as commonly believed, they are a subset of the DoD, and are beholden to military decisions. Its not to say that everyone working for them is a bad guy. I genuinely believe there are some honest folks there, good people, but ultimately it all gets back to the power structures and whose really been in charge all along. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: ∞
Posts: 654
|
Quote:
Well that's another subject, but if I may interject a bit. NASA's Smoking Gun, Part II, LCROSS' (and LRO's) Secret NASA Mission to the Moon .... I suspect you'll disagree with a lot of that information there, but consider the conclusion, and note the interesting parts where Hoagland mentions all the international space agencies, which include Japan, China, Russia, etc. All these space agencies are spending hundreds of millions, for what, rock samples? No, more likely a high tech continuous surveillance (note; Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter) of ancient ruins and structures, particularly using radar to penetrate the surface and see with the newest equipment whats down there. Its also more likely that the other countries like Japan are working in conjuction with NASA, joint secrecy, not difficult in the least. Just my opinion though. Cheers, Last edited by Majorion; 12-17-2009 at 01:37 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Avalon Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 96
|
wow here is another story from CNN released today. liquid on titan
http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/1...ion/index.html they are really pushing this water in space thing. is it normal for so many space related news stories to be around? |
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|