The Jonathan Reed Hoax - Project Camelot impersonation on YouTube

Slerbot · 03-05-2010, 02:09 AM

Re: Jack Burns and his profile: I don't like the glowing, bronzed facebook 'interpretation' of this Crocoshyte Dundee guy one bit.

Are we supposed to be impressed by his high profile friends and his no-nonsense fake portrait?
Is he to be the CIA's next Hugh Jackman? What's up with
all of this? Something stinks.

Jealousy abounds regarding this stereotyped macho alright (least from the
crappy painting), but Bill might be onto something about this latest smooth
operator. My instinct is Kerry would be wise to get away from that one, if
only as connection to him (and this major new fracture) will surely pull down
what remains of PC's credibility.

I haven't seen a 'fair-dinkum aussie' that looks like that, who also can help
organise conferences, rope a crock in his sleep, and is knowledgable about
secret govt advanced future tech, dodging invisible scrambler beams from
black-ops satellites etc... since I last time I viewed this dodgy Paul Hogan
impersonator's facebook profile. "You call that a neutrino weapon?.."

Haha, sport! What a crock....

FTR I am australian (and living out of town), and know all about 'us' and our
few stereotypes, and this kind of 'bloke' does not ring true for a second,
as much as it appeals.

It's been there all along and I can't say I could blame either Bill or Kerry for
these major ruptures, but.. there are some suspicious people around them
now, as there were when they were under the sway of the so-called 'Dr'
Dan Burrish.

It all started to go to poop with Dr. Rubbish/Marci and their PsyOps BS. I
feel PC should have admitted some error there (about his past 'testimomy'),
not tried to save face.

And then we had 'Dr' Pete Peterson, much hyped. Doctor's of all disciplines
are very easy to come by, and half of them are also full of shyte. Peterson
gave me the creeps and provided almost nothing of real worth. I thought he
was all huff and puff, and needed some quiet time on the potty, alone with
his inventions (still waiting, Pete). I can't say I believe David Wilcock really
believed alot of Peterson's puffing either, but he has other stuff to sell in
his site, reputations were on the line, and he's a shrude small businessman
as much as a 'seer', in my opinion, though his articles and analysis are usually
very good.

At the time of the asian visit, Bill was also convinced of 'Jake Simpson's
authenticity. Now it's been suggested by some he is in fact 'Jack Burns'.
There are some very good actors out there, the pay or rewards must beat
what they could pull in tv and film right now. Why should we believe
anything he (Jake S) has said in the past, either? Are we being led again..
is that the idea? I am tired of being conned by this stuff.

If you know the truth on something, why not speak it without 16 additional
layers of BULLSHYTE and fake names, please. Please do not impersonate
others or present suspect information stolen or cobbled together from other
sources. And please Bill and Kerry, do not throw these things at the world
unless you can verify from other independent sources that the
whistleblower is genuine.

I feel we have all been fooled on PC many times. However I also believe
there is sometimes truths in some of what PC/PA/Portal/Twitter Feed
continues to present (depending on the interviewee!). I have seen many
likely scenarios and 'predictions' fail to materialise even recently, yet some
of those people were apparently trusted sources. 'Dr' Deagle has also been
SHOWN TO BE a waste of time. Why keep going back, flaggelation?

I have been critical as I have read, followed and listened, and have also
been fooled and made to realise it. Now, our BS detector's are in need of
re-tuning, they are more important than ever!

I am thankful for both Kerry and Bill for going to such lengths and troubles
and expense (thanks to donations too!) to always present their interviews,
radio shows, video's and opinions to the world GRATIS. I for now hope they
can mend their relationship in short time, as I enjoyed their joint interviews
and even occasional bickering!

All the best to you both, don't let them win.

Thank you.

PS. Barry, I read your post after I posted! About the Doc's and the 'insiders', a very good call.

03-05-2010, 02:09 AM	#7
Slerbot Avalon Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Outer Towne, Orstralia Posts: 36	Re: The Jonathan Reed Hoax - Project Camelot impersonation on YouTube Re: Jack Burns and his profile: I don't like the glowing, bronzed facebook 'interpretation' of this Crocoshyte Dundee guy one bit. Are we supposed to be impressed by his high profile friends and his no-nonsense fake portrait? Is he to be the CIA's next Hugh Jackman? What's up with all of this? Something stinks. Jealousy abounds regarding this stereotyped macho alright (least from the crappy painting), but Bill might be onto something about this latest smooth operator. My instinct is Kerry would be wise to get away from that one, if only as connection to him (and this major new fracture) will surely pull down what remains of PC's credibility. I haven't seen a 'fair-dinkum aussie' that looks like that, who also can help organise conferences, rope a crock in his sleep, and is knowledgable about secret govt advanced future tech, dodging invisible scrambler beams from black-ops satellites etc... since I last time I viewed this dodgy Paul Hogan impersonator's facebook profile. "You call that a neutrino weapon?.." Haha, sport! What a crock.... FTR I am australian (and living out of town), and know all about 'us' and our few stereotypes, and this kind of 'bloke' does not ring true for a second, as much as it appeals. It's been there all along and I can't say I could blame either Bill or Kerry for these major ruptures, but.. there are some suspicious people around them now, as there were when they were under the sway of the so-called 'Dr' Dan Burrish. It all started to go to poop with Dr. Rubbish/Marci and their PsyOps BS. I feel PC should have admitted some error there (about his past 'testimomy'), not tried to save face. And then we had 'Dr' Pete Peterson, much hyped. Doctor's of all disciplines are very easy to come by, and half of them are also full of shyte. Peterson gave me the creeps and provided almost nothing of real worth. I thought he was all huff and puff, and needed some quiet time on the potty, alone with his inventions (still waiting, Pete). I can't say I believe David Wilcock really believed alot of Peterson's puffing either, but he has other stuff to sell in his site, reputations were on the line, and he's a shrude small businessman as much as a 'seer', in my opinion, though his articles and analysis are usually very good. At the time of the asian visit, Bill was also convinced of 'Jake Simpson's authenticity. Now it's been suggested by some he is in fact 'Jack Burns'. There are some very good actors out there, the pay or rewards must beat what they could pull in tv and film right now. Why should we believe anything he (Jake S) has said in the past, either? Are we being led again.. is that the idea? I am tired of being conned by this stuff. If you know the truth on something, why not speak it without 16 additional layers of BULLSHYTE and fake names, please. Please do not impersonate others or present suspect information stolen or cobbled together from other sources. And please Bill and Kerry, do not throw these things at the world unless you can verify from other independent sources that the whistleblower is genuine. I feel we have all been fooled on PC many times. However I also believe there is sometimes truths in some of what PC/PA/Portal/Twitter Feed continues to present (depending on the interviewee!). I have seen many likely scenarios and 'predictions' fail to materialise even recently, yet some of those people were apparently trusted sources. 'Dr' Deagle has also been SHOWN TO BE a waste of time. Why keep going back, flaggelation? I have been critical as I have read, followed and listened, and have also been fooled and made to realise it. Now, our BS detector's are in need of re-tuning, they are more important than ever! I am thankful for both Kerry and Bill for going to such lengths and troubles and expense (thanks to donations too!) to always present their interviews, radio shows, video's and opinions to the world GRATIS. I for now hope they can mend their relationship in short time, as I enjoyed their joint interviews and even occasional bickering! All the best to you both, don't let them win. Thank you. PS. Barry, I read your post after I posted! About the Doc's and the 'insiders', a very good call. Last edited by Slerbot; 03-05-2010 at 02:17 AM.