The "New" UAP Discussion, and Clean Abundant Energy

It seems like more people are interested in UAP in recent years, which is great. But the motives around disclosure seem to focus on safety of pilots, security over military bases, and the like. Has anyone else been yearning for more mainstream interviewers or legislators to now ask about the potential energy sources that relate to technology from crash recoveries or NHI? Like "Hey wait, so, if someone testified under oath that we have craft that can defy our known human limits for inertia, then that means we could all have clean/free energy sources, right? Like, wouldn't there have to be 70 years worth of secret suppressed physics? And wouldn't it be trivial to power a city the size of Detroit from a quantum vacuum device the size of a suitcase?" I'm adding my own fictional flair of course, but it's probably not far off the mark.

Personally I think this is what the military industrial complex fears most, letting that "cat out of the bag" so to speak about clean energy. Sure, throw people gimbal videos to obsess over in congressional hearings, or even allow talk about "biologics". But I suspect when the real physical threats start is when energy companies fear losing their grip on that energy dependence.

What do you all think? I mean this isn't a new idea, and UFO researchers etc have been talking about it for 30-40 years. I just wonder how tough it will be for most people to take that next big step in reasoning. What are some ideas to help people understand why the UAP topic is so important? People can barely (or can't) afford food, medicine, housing, and water. And energy costs are baked into the pricing of all of those essentials. I recall studies by RAND or university economists regarding disclosure, how it would "upset" our economic structures. Said another way, maybe it would save lives.

Do legislators need to be clued in more about this potential aspect of the UAP story? Should I assume it's still too risky for people like Grusch or Elizondo to go on news interviews and urge people to ask more questions about it? This whole thing's just so drawn out and irritating. We all can't see huge technological changes in our lifetimes, like people who were born in 1885. And I'm way oversimplifying some things, I'll admit. But this truth/science/physics embargo is starting to get ridiculous, right?