Charlie Kirk assassinated, 10 Sept 2025

• Sniper Spotted On Video At Charlie Kirk Tragedy!:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Ot0HY3Gq4Aw

Jimmy Dore and Kurt Metzger react to reports of Charlie Kirk’s assassination at Utah Valley University, with speculation about a rooftop sniper and questions over whether this was a political hit. Utah Governor Spencer Cox called it a “political assassination,” while President Donald Trump issued condolences and MSNBC drew backlash for suggesting the shooting might be exploited politically.

Jimmy highlights how the media downplays or reframes political violence, comparing it to past shootings where motives were obscured, and suggests U.S. intelligence agencies manipulate events and narratives. Both Jimmy and Kurt frame the killing as symptomatic of a “depraved society,” possibly linked to deep state or CIA interference, while condemning those celebrating the violence.

This is a dark day in the history of our country.

You don’t have to believe in what Charlie Kirk stood for to mourn his death and recognize that political assassination is abhorrent. At the end of the day, Charlie was a husband and father. My heart breaks for his family. No one deserves to be executed for their politics.

And for the record—one’s compassion for their fellow human should not be conditional. My empathy for the Kirk family is not contingent on whether Charlie shared my views, or even grieved for the same victims of violence I did. In matters of life and death we must show mercy and humanity.

May Charlie rest in peace.

https://x.com/anyaparampil/status/1965883952327209131

Governor Spenser Cox (R-Utah) formally declares: "This is a political assassination," and poses profound questions for all Americans.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=pDF-mooTzs4

Quote:

---

Posted by rgray222

To truly understand why to Charlie Kirk had to die, it is essential to recognize who he genuinely was. Many perceive him simply as a Republican or conservative media personality, often equating him with figures like Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, or Jesse Watters—individuals who are easily replaceable and primarily serve as talking heads on television.

Charlie Kirk represented much more than that. He was a movement—a catalyst challenging the indoctrination prevalent in American and Worldwide higher education. He was effectively breaking the grip of progressive and Democratic ideological influence on students, persuading millions to reconsider the brainwashing they had been exposed to. He was showing students that there was another way, a better way. He was showing students that the negative media narrative about Republicans and Conservatives was not correct, and an increasing number of students were eager to embrace it. The expanding attendance at his events and the surge in students reflected his wildly growing and successful influence.

His success posed a significant threat to the established political power structure. The Democratic Party, and particularly the Progressives (Globalist), had invested substantial time, money, and effort into making college campuses ideological indoctrination centers. Charlie Kirk’s rising prominence and ability to inspire a new generation challenged their strategic objectives. As his influence continued to grow, it became clear that he could no longer be allowed to stand in their way.

There is little doubt in my mind that they will catch the assassin, and what I have written here will not match up to the motive that I have described. That will be intentional.

---

I think you're spot on. Not to mention, casus belli for militarizing the whole government.
US is truly lost.

Quote:

---

Posted by dim

"Gun Deaths ‘Unfortunately’ Worth it to Keep 2nd Amendment - Charlie Kirk"

Live by the sword...

---

Charlie understood that personal liberties need constant defending, both intellectually and against potentially violent and authoritarian governments. He understood that an armed populace was necessary to maintain these freedoms (and the respect of it's government) even though he knew there would be some needless violence as a result. Without guns, the citizens have no leverage and are at the total mercy of their governments (like China and to a lesser degree the UK). This is unacceptable to Americans, and we're willing to pay the price to avoid it.

Kirk wasn't "living by the sword". That's a preposterous thing to say. He just understood that authorities shouldn't be the only ones with swords.

Quote:

---

Posted by rgray222

i was going to put this on the great quotes thread but i think it is more appropriate here on this day

Quote:

---

hate can not drive out hate, only love can do that.
Martin luther king.

---

---

bs .......................................... Rrr

Quote:

---

Posted by s7e6e

Quote:

---

Posted by rgray222

To truly understand why to Charlie Kirk had to die, it is essential to recognize who he genuinely was. Many perceive him simply as a Republican or conservative media personality, often equating him with figures like Sean Hannity, Tucker Carlson, or Jesse Watters—individuals who are easily replaceable and primarily serve as talking heads on television.

Charlie Kirk represented much more than that. He was a movement—a catalyst challenging the indoctrination prevalent in American and Worldwide higher education. He was effectively breaking the grip of progressive and Democratic ideological influence on students, persuading millions to reconsider the brainwashing they had been exposed to. He was showing students that there was another way, a better way. He was showing students that the negative media narrative about Republicans and Conservatives was not correct, and an increasing number of students were eager to embrace it. The expanding attendance at his events and the surge in students reflected his wildly growing and successful influence.

His success posed a significant threat to the established political power structure. The Democratic Party, and particularly the Progressives (Globalist), had invested substantial time, money, and effort into making college campuses ideological indoctrination centers. Charlie Kirk’s rising prominence and ability to inspire a new generation challenged their strategic objectives. As his influence continued to grow, it became clear that he could no longer be allowed to stand in their way.

There is little doubt in my mind that they will catch the assassin, and what I have written here will not match up to the motive that I have described. That will be intentional.

---

I think you're spot on. Not to mention, casus belli for militarizing the whole government.
US is truly lost.

---

This was a bold move by the global-lice, they're desperate and showing their hand. Every move is a diversion and distraction to take attention and energy away from things being revealed they desperately don't want the public to know. Every desperate move they make, while horrible and sickening to the extreme, which IS their m.o. to traumatise the masses, only serves to awaken more and more each and every day. I'm truly saddened by yet another senseless death in a 48 hour period, but something tells me we're reaching the fulcrum, nearing closer to the hundredth monkey. Anyone else feeling the extreme highs and lows lately? I swear I'm riding a roller coaster these last few weeks, one minute riding high thinking life can't get any better while the next instant I'm plunging to the bottom and ready to end it all because it all feels so hopeless and futile. I've read much wisdom recently from many on this forum advising to pull focus away from the screen playing out before us because it's all a distraction to keep us reacting instead of proacting. In other words, find your center, strengthen that connection above all else, that, and only that, is what's real, and don't let them steer you where they're trying to steer you. We're still in Plato's cave, it's all shadowplay.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=HXWMqBoZUW4

100% behind this man

RRR

Hi, I'm currently on holiday with only a small laptop and I only just heard this news. I just read (somewhere - sorry, it's difficult to keep track) that apart from the obvious motive to kill Charlie, allegedly the secondary task involves next killing a prominent leftist in order to set left against right and to trigger a civil war. Hopefully this theory is wrong or is thwarted.

Found it: https://x.com/VigilantFox/status/1965954943551959310

More here… 🤷‍♂️

Charlie was awakening to Israel’s hypocrisy
> He used to be an Israel loyalist
> He feared ‘Israel would kill him’
> He started *mildly* criticizing Israel
> He said Epstein was Mossad
> He let anti-Zionists speak at his events
> Zionist media started attacking him
> Someone shot his jugular 200 yards away
> Netanyahu tweets within minutes
> Patsy gets arrested & acts guilty
> Assassin escapes without a trace
> Netanyahu tweets longer message

Something tells me they’re not going to tell us the truth about who killed Charlie Kirk…

____
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2...-charlie-kirk/


********

Now here’s another brave stance that Kirk assumed, which is a quite precarious one when you are a major conservative figure traveling all over the USA and ascending higher and higher public and private platforms.

Iran–Israel War

Main article: Iran-Israel War
In June 2025, Kirk opposed the involvement of the United States in the Iran–Israel War.[123]

The bottom line here is that it really does appear that Charlie Kirk may have been ever so slowly and subtly tracing out a future trajectory not too unlike the truth-talking Candace Owens. And, for that he paid the highest price a truth speaker can ever pay.

Highly Profession Hit

All of the evidence thus far points to the highly professional and complex execution plan complete with an extremely organized cover-up.

https://stateofthenation.info/?p=33087

It's all shocking enough, and awful, as with Iryna: a terrible day :rose:

I'll not share the video as I might usually but through this link is the moment poor Charlie got shot:

https://x.com/simpatico771/status/1965849389047652728

It was an op.

https://x.com/stellarman22/status/1965940172660551877

[/url]

Quote:

---

Posted by neutronstar

It was an op.

---

Most likely. Just like Trump's staged assassination attempt.

Quote:

---

Posted by s7e6e

Quote:

---

Posted by neutronstar

It was an op.

---

Most likely. Just like Trump's staged assassination attempt.

---

If it was, it was done in a rush. They had no time or resources to provide a patsy.

Quote:

---

Posted by Eric J (Viking)

More here… 🤷‍♂️

Charlie was awakening to Israel’s hypocrisy
> He used to be an Israel loyalist
> He feared ‘Israel would kill him’
> He started *mildly* criticizing Israel
> He said Epstein was Mossad
> He let anti-Zionists speak at his events
> Zionist media started attacking him
> Someone shot his jugular 200 yards away
> Netanyahu tweets within minutes
> Patsy gets arrested & acts guilty
> Assassin escapes without a trace
> Netanyahu tweets longer message

Something tells me they’re not going to tell us the truth about who killed Charlie Kirk…

____
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2...-charlie-kirk/


********

Now here’s another brave stance that Kirk assumed, which is a quite precarious one when you are a major conservative figure traveling all over the USA and ascending higher and higher public and private platforms.

Iran–Israel War

Main article: Iran-Israel War
In June 2025, Kirk opposed the involvement of the United States in the Iran–Israel War.[123]

The bottom line here is that it really does appear that Charlie Kirk may have been ever so slowly and subtly tracing out a future trajectory not too unlike the truth-talking Candace Owens. And, for that he paid the highest price a truth speaker can ever pay.

Highly Profession Hit

All of the evidence thus far points to the highly professional and complex execution plan complete with an extremely organized cover-up.

https://stateofthenation.info/?p=33087

---

Yep, I agree with the above, that there are many pointers to Israel in this matter. Other telling 'coincidences' are that this assassination was timed for the day prior to 9/11, and just a day after the Israel assassinations in Qatar. No doubt, the shooting of Charlie Kirk will now take the focus off the outrageous Israel crimes in Qatar. Is the timing a coincidence? What other motives would Israel have to taking out Charlie Kirk?

Is there more info on why exactly Charlie Kirk "feared ‘Israel would kill him’"?

Here's an interesting analysis (10 minute video) with clips of Charlie Kirk's prior comments about Epstein's blackmail operation for Israel, specifically that "members of congress are actively being blackmailed, the Epstein playbook is being used on a daily basis".

Charlie Kirk insisted that Epstein was MOSSAD
https://youtube.com/watch?v=kW_nPlXdQ8Y

There are a lot of people who are really happy he was killed. The victory cheers accidentally heard in the back-offices of TMZ are a microcosm of the cheers round the world. Here's a thread on twitter of people's celebration and relief that Charlie Kirk was murdered: horrible twitter thread compilation of people celebrating murder here. I don't want to live on this planet any more. I'm convinced most of these useful idiots don't know what they're saying. God Almighty give us strength.

Quote:

---

Posted by Matthew 24

9 Then shall they deliver you up to be afflicted, and shall kill you: and ye shall be hated of all nations for my name's sake. 10 And then shall many be offended, and shall betray one another, and shall hate one another. 11 And many false prophets shall rise, and shall deceive many. 12 And because iniquity shall abound, the love of many shall wax cold. 13 But he that shall endure unto the end, the same shall be saved.

---

Quote:

---

Posted by dim

"Gun Deaths ‘Unfortunately’ Worth it to Keep 2nd Amendment - Charlie Kirk"

Live by the sword...

---

I'll clarify that quote for you:

Don't live by the chain...

Didn't see this one coming. Sheesh.

Charlie was highly motivated to make a difference and did. As I believe most or all of our big events in life are planned or at least allowed by our higher self. Hopefully his death leads to being the biggest difference he will make. That would make his life story and legacy even more epic.

Seems like a risky shot taking out a wholesome guy like this, even if the delusional people see him as some horrible human. Any chance this just lights a fire inside millions of good people? Could bring some more bravery and supposedly there's going to be whistleblowers coming out to shake things up at some point. But also risky to allow him to continue to rally the students.

Could we see more defiance and resistance from the patriots and good people.

Say Hi to Ozzy Charlie :) Thank you for all of your hard work.

His poor little ones. Sigh.

Quote:

---

Posted by Rizotto

Quote:

---

Posted by Eric J (Viking)

More here… 🤷‍♂️

Charlie was awakening to Israel’s hypocrisy
> He used to be an Israel loyalist
> He feared ‘Israel would kill him’
> He started *mildly* criticizing Israel
> He said Epstein was Mossad
> He let anti-Zionists speak at his events
> Zionist media started attacking him
> Someone shot his jugular 200 yards away
> Netanyahu tweets within minutes
> Patsy gets arrested & acts guilty
> Assassin escapes without a trace
> Netanyahu tweets longer message

Something tells me they’re not going to tell us the truth about who killed Charlie Kirk…
____
https://www.theburningplatform.com/2...-charlie-kirk/

********

Now here’s another brave stance that Kirk assumed, which is a quite precarious one when you are a major conservative figure traveling all over the USA and ascending higher and higher public and private platforms.

Iran–Israel War

Main article: Iran-Israel War
In June 2025, Kirk opposed the involvement of the United States in the Iran–Israel War.[123]

The bottom line here is that it really does appear that Charlie Kirk may have been ever so slowly and subtly tracing out a future trajectory not too unlike the truth-talking Candace Owens. And, for that he paid the highest price a truth speaker can ever pay.

Highly Profession Hit

All of the evidence thus far points to the highly professional and complex execution plan complete with an extremely organized cover-up.

https://stateofthenation.info/?p=33087

---

Yep, I agree with the above, that there are many pointers to Israel in this matter. Other telling 'coincidences' are that this assassination was timed for the day prior to 9/11, and just a day after the Israel assassinations in Qatar. No doubt, the shooting of Charlie Kirk will now take the focus off the outrageous Israel crimes in Qatar. Is the timing a coincidence? What other motives would Israel have to taking out Charlie Kirk?

Is there more info on why exactly Charlie Kirk "feared ‘Israel would kill him’"?

Here's an interesting analysis (10 minute video) with clips of Charlie Kirk's prior comments about Epstein's blackmail operation for Israel, specifically that "members of congress are actively being blackmailed, the Epstein playbook is being used on a daily basis".

Charlie Kirk insisted that Epstein was MOSSAD
https://youtube.com/watch?v=kW_nPlXdQ8Y

---

~~~

I'm taking the liberty — or maybe the risk — of bumping this post already. And also adding this, which, for whatever it may be worth (maybe nothing) I confess leapt out at me immediately.

https://t.me/DDGeopolitics/159783

The text:

A theory making the rounds on X yesterday suggested that Charlie Kirk may have been targeted by Israel.

It all started with a resurfaced tweet from Harrison Smith, host of American Journal on InfoWars, posted about a month ago. In it, Smith claimed he’d heard that “Kirk was afraid he’d be killed if he turned on Israel.”

Since then, people have dug up examples of Israeli (or Israeli-aligned) media attacking Kirk for “giving a voice to anti-Israel voices” on his show, along with a recent segment where he and Megyn Kelly discussed Epstein being a Mossad agent.

The speculation only grew after Benjamin Netanyahu posted about Kirk immediately following the shooting — and then again after Kirk was pronounced dead.

If Charlie Kirk being KNOWN to be very outspoken critical about Epstein (openly stating possible (most likely) Israeli Mossad connections) and exposing other hypocrisies dealing with US-Israel relationships multiple times ...

Knowing how Israel-Mossad has ties with using Advanced A.I. ... I wonder if they used A.I. to predict how fast Charlie Kirk was going to be more and more influential and what his "estimated effects" are on the long run with Israel-US relationships. Could that be a factor/angle to consider? And lets, for argument’s sake, that someone leaks hard evidence Charlie Kirk is killed by a hired assassin paid by Mossad ... how would USA and Trump react?

Grok also refuse to analyze this current forum thread link, while it easily showed IT CAN fetch/extract content external links from Project Avalon Forum multiple times with precision last weeks, even all 54+ pages if need be, like UAPs/UFOs for example!

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

<<!-- edit update: -->>

September 11, 2025: Grok.com Grok 3, Grok 4 "Expert Mode" and Grok 4 "Deep Search" ALL refuse to answer, nor add a "title" of a new chat session I created being an X Premium Plus Account user! DEAD SILENT ... No rebuttal, no "debunking", no nothing. When I look at my chat sessions history tab, it does not even show up!


Source: https://www.rumble.com/video/v6wkws2/?pub=4mai79