The New Pope A High Jesuit NWO Exposed

[Referee]

An interesting take on the appointment of a high Jesuit into the Papacy.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=0FbjWU08kdo

Jesuit Oath:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=yx84BToEdNM

[WyoSeeker]

Wow, that's a crazy oath!

In fact it sounded so crazy I figured it had to be an urban legend kind of deal. You know, easily debunked with a google or snopes search. So I poked around a bit and here's what I found...

This text does actually exist in the congressional record and the library of congress.

The only debunking seemed aimed at discrediting the ease with which one can get material into these records. There seemed to be no actual debunking of the material itself.

The congressional records are from 1913 but books (listed in the library of congress) citing this text date back to 1677.

Guess it has to be true. I knew the catholic church was vile and evil. I recognized them as the largest sex and slavery ring in history, but this glimpse behind the curtain took me by surprise.

My soul shudders at the thought of taking such a vow. Crazy is still all I can say.

For your reference:
http://www.ianpaisley.org/article.asp?ArtKey=jesuit

[Yvonne]

Gee, that's Godly.

[westhill]

What do you see here??
or
What do they want you to see?



This March 11, 2013 file picture made available by the Vatican newspaper L'Osservatore Romano
shows the urns where each cardinal will place his folded ballot after voting inside the Sistine Chapel
during the conclave at the Vatican. While the voting for the pope is billed as secret, with each
cardinal guided only by his faith in God, the process is ultimately a closed-door exercise in
consensus-building that cements fidelity to the Church's new leader among the inner circle.
(AP Photo/L'Osservatore Romano, ho, file)

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

this reminds me of the black abbot of westminster abbey.
back when england and the catholic church were really at war,
some of the jesuits fled to england and set up private practice at the behest of the royalty.

this is when the english monarchies got into black magic and alchemy, if my research proves accurate.
those jesuits really knew their science and were very far ahead of the norm.
if anything things used to be more closed and compartmentalized in the past than they are now.
i think it's because of feudalism and monarchies, they knew that knowledge was power and they kept better secrets than modern politicians.

in fact i would imagine that the modern jesuit order is a bit more tame because their position is no longer in peril as it once was.
you should really read up on the Vatican partnership with CERN that was announced a while back.

CERN is working on the Blue Brain Project, which I call the World Brain Project. it's ugly, it's sin, it's evil as the pit,
and it's coming to a vatican near you.

[humanalien]

What worries me about this new pope, is the
way that he has people eating out of his hand
already.

If we are to heed the words spoken about the
last pope being the anti-christ and in the beginning,
he will be loved by everyone, well it looks like
he is very much liked already.

I'm not saying that he is the anti-christ. I was just
making a comparison i guess, between the pope and
what we hear about the anti-christ.

[Flash]

Posted by Referee (here)
An interesting take on the appointment of a high Jesuit into the Papacy.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=0FbjWU08kdo

Jesuit Oath:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=yx84BToEdNM

I can't take it, the guy is eating and drinking while taping his video. Not only does he drag his topic, he eats and we have to listen to his swallowing. For me this is the aposteosis of lack of savoir vivre. You don't even do that to your life partner, why would you to a public audience? Not listening to this.

[Hervé]

Yep, here comes "their" new pope:



The “Dirty War” Pope

16 March 2013

For over a week, the media has subjected the public to a tidal wave of euphoric banality on the Roman Catholic Church’s selection of a new pope.

This non-stop celebration of the dogma and ritual of an institution that for centuries has been identified with oppression and backwardness is stamped with a deeply undemocratic character. It is reflective of the rightward turn of the entire political establishment and its repudiation of the principles enshrined in the US Constitution, including the wall of separation between church and state.

What a far cry from the political ideals that animated those who drafted that document. It was Thomas Jefferson’s well-founded opinion that “In every country and in every age, the priest has been hostile to liberty. He is always in alliance with the despot, abetting his abuses in return for protection to his own.”

Jefferson’s view—and the reactionary character of the media’s sycophantic coverage—finds no more powerful conformation than in the identity of the new pope, officially celebrated as a paragon of “humility” and “renewal.”

Placed on the papal throne is not only another hard-line opponent of Marxism, the Enlightenment and all manner of human progress, but a man who is deeply and directly implicated in one of the greatest crimes of the post-World War II era—Argentina’s “Dirty War.”

Amid the pomp and ceremony Friday, the Vatican spokesman was compelled to address the past of the new Pope Francis—the former Archbishop of Buenos Aires, Jorge Bergoglio. He dismissed the accusations against him as the work of “anti-clerical left-wing elements.”

That “left-wing elements” would denounce the complicity of the Church’s leaders in the “Dirty War” waged by the military junta that ruled Argentina between 1976 and 1983 is scarcely surprising. They accounted for many of the estimated 30,000 workers, students, intellectuals and others who were “disappeared” and murdered, and the tens of thousands more who were imprisoned and tortured.

But some of Bergoglio’s harshest critics come from within the Catholic Church itself, including priests and lay workers who say he handed them over to the torturers as part of a collaborative effort to “cleanse” the Church of “leftists.” One of them, a Jesuit priest, Orlando Yorio, was abducted along with another priest after ignoring a warning from Bergoglio, then head of the Jesuit order in Argentina, to stop their work in a Buenos Aires slum district.

During the first trial of leaders of the military junta in 1985, Yorio declared, “I am sure that he himself gave over the list with our names to the Navy.” The two were taken to the notorious Navy School of Mechanics (ESMA) torture center and held for over five months before being drugged and dumped in a town outside the city.

Bergoglio was ideologically predisposed to backing the mass political killings unleashed by the junta. In the early 1970s, he was associated with the right-wing Peronist Guardia de Hierro (Iron Guard), whose cadre—together with elements of the Peronist trade union bureaucracy—were employed in the death squads known as the Triple A (Argentine Anti-Communist Alliance), which carried out a campaign of extermination against left-wing opponents of the military before the junta even took power. Adm. Emilio Massera, the chief of the Navy and the leading ideologue of the junta, also employed these elements, particularly in the disposal of the personal property of the “disappeared.”

Yorio, who died in 2000, charged that Bergoglio “had communications with Admiral Massera, and had informed him that I was the chief of the guerrillas.”

The junta viewed the most minimal expression of opposition to the existing social order or sympathy for the oppressed as “terrorism.” The other priest who was abducted, Francisco Jalics, recounted in a book that Bergoglio had promised them he would tell the military that they were not terrorists. He wrote, “From subsequent statements by an official and 30 documents that I was able to access later, we were able to prove, without any room for doubt, that this man did not keep his promise, but that, on the contrary, he presented a false denunciation to the military.”

Bergoglio declined to appear at the first trial of the junta as well as at subsequent proceedings to which he was summoned. In 2010, when he finally did submit to questioning, lawyers for the victims found him to be “evasive” and “lying.”

Bergoglio claimed that he learned only after the end of the dictatorship of the junta’s practice of stealing the babies of disappeared mothers, who were abducted, held until giving birth and then executed, with their children given to military or police families. This lie was exposed by people who had gone to him for help in finding missing relatives.

The collaboration with the junta was not a mere personal failing of Bergoglio, but rather the policy of the Church hierarchy, which backed the military’s aims and methods. The Argentine journalist Horacio Verbitsky exposed Bergoglio’s attempted cover-up for this systemic complicity in a book that Bergoglio authored, which edited out compromising sentences from a memorandum recording a meeting between the Church leadership and the junta in November 1976, eight months after the military coup.

The excised statement included the pledge that the Church “in no way intends to take a critical position toward the action of the government,” as its “failure would lead, with great probability, to Marxism.” It declared the Catholic Church’s “understanding, adherence and acceptance” in relation to the so-called “Proceso” that unleashed a reign of terror against Argentine working people.

This support was by no means platonic. The junta’s detention and torture centers were assigned priests, whose job it was, not to minister to those suffering torture and death, but to help the torturers and killers overcome any pangs of conscience. Using such biblical parables as “separating the wheat from the chafe,” they assured those operating the so-called “death flights,” in which political prisoners were drugged, stripped naked, bundled onto airplanes and thrown into the sea, that they were doing “God’s work.” Others participated in the torture sessions and tried to use the rite of confession to extract information of use to the torturers.

This collaboration was supported from the Vatican on down. In 1981, on the eve of Argentina’s war with Britain over the Malvinas (Falkland) Islands, Pope John Paul II flew to Buenos Aires, appearing with the junta and kissing its then-chief, Gen. Leopoldo Galtieri, while saying not a word about the tens of thousands who had been kidnapped, tortured and murdered.

As Jefferson noted, the Church is “always in alliance with the despot,” as it was in backing Franco’s fascists in Spain, its collaboration with the Nazis as they carried out the Holocaust in Europe, and its support of the US war in Vietnam.

Nonetheless, the naming of a figure like Bergoglio as pope—and its celebration within the media and ruling circles—must serve as a stark warning. Not only are the horrific crimes carried out in Argentina 30 years ago embraced, those in power are contemplating the use of similar methods once again to defend capitalism from intensifying class struggle and the threat of social revolution.
Bill Van Auken
From: http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2013.../pers-m16.html

[Referee]

Here is some more for those interested>>>

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=oRRYj7R14gM

[Referee]

a Bit More Here the Pope's Coat of Arms broken down..

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=k7LNBNowT1s