+ Reply to Thread
Page 13 of 20 FirstFirst 1 3 13 20 LastLast
Results 241 to 260 of 382

Thread: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

  1. Link to Post #241
    Brazil Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th April 2013
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,453
    Thanks
    11,308
    Thanked 7,529 times in 1,350 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Video montage I made on CERN

    Cern Project
    Last edited by naste.de.lumina; 29th September 2015 at 18:41. Reason: Vídeo resolution correction

  2. Link to Post #242
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    21st March 2010
    Location
    the foothills of le Massif Central, France
    Age
    79
    Posts
    1,352
    Thanks
    7,476
    Thanked 4,829 times in 1,059 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by naste.de.lumina (here)
    Video montage I made on CERN

    Cern Project
    This video has been removed by the user.

    Sorry about that.

  3. Link to Post #243
    Brazil Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th April 2013
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,453
    Thanks
    11,308
    Thanked 7,529 times in 1,350 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by heyokah (here)

    This video has been removed by the user.

    Sorry about that.
    I removed, increasing the volume and re-sent. It's Ok now.

  4. Link to Post #244
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    20th March 2010
    Location
    Within a few kilometers of Avalon
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,702
    Thanks
    3,990
    Thanked 7,178 times in 1,466 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by naste.de.lumina (here)
    Video montage I made on CERN

    Cern Project
    Great montage, naste.

    Here's a short clip you might consider adding to the final cut....
    Last edited by observer; 29th September 2015 at 19:00.

  5. Link to Post #245
    Brazil Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th April 2013
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,453
    Thanks
    11,308
    Thanked 7,529 times in 1,350 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by observer (here)
    Great montage, naste.

    Here's a short clip you might consider adding to the final cut....
    Thank you for your kindness observer.

    I take this opportunity to say that the video resolution has been corrected.

    Cern Project

    Hugs.

    Naste.

  6. Link to Post #246
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    20th March 2010
    Location
    Within a few kilometers of Avalon
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,702
    Thanks
    3,990
    Thanked 7,178 times in 1,466 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Here's a quote from Bill Ryan's first [I believe] interview with Henry Deacon, found here.

    Quote [My emphasis]-
    [Henry]- There's a project called Shiva Nova at Livermore which uses arrays of giant lasers. These are huge lasers, huge capacitors, many terawatts of energy, in a building built on giant springs [extends his arms to show the size], all focused on a tiny tiny point. This creates a fusion reaction which replicates certain conditions for nuclear weapons testing. It’s like a nuke test in lab conditions, and there's very powerful data collection focused on that point where all the energy is focused.

    The problem is that all extremely high-energy events like this create rips in the fabric of spacetime. This was observed back in the early Hiroshima and Nagasaki events, and you can even see it in the old movies. Look for what looks like an expanding energy sphere, and I can send you a link to show you. The problem with creating rips in spacetime, whether they're big or little, is that things get in that you don’t want to be there.

    [Bill]- Things get in?

    [Henry]- Things get in. Things that we all know about that are discussed on the net a lot. Beings, and influences, and all kinds of weird stuff, and I can tell you they’ve created big problems.

    [Bill]- What kind of problems?

    [Henry]- [pause]
    The problem of their presence and then what happens next. The other problem is that if you’re creating rips in spacetime you’re messing with time itself, whether you mean to or not. There have been attempts to fix that, and it all results in a complicated overlay of time loops. Some ETs are trying to help, and others, others are not. When predicting futures, we can only talk about probable and possible futures. This is all extremely complex and very highly classified. Basically, it’s just a huge mess. We've opened Pandora’s Box, starting with the Manhattan Project, and we haven't yet found a way to deal with the consequences.

    CERN is a continuation of this "[Dance of] Shiva Nova" Project. Henry's testimony is directly related to what they are doing at CERN.

    I've heard of this high energy time distortion phenomenon being described in discussions of the "Philadelphia Experiment", where the project all began when observations of time distortions were noted during extremely high amperage welding operations experienced during battle ship repairs.

    "Things get in", and quite possibly at high enough energy levels, things get out....

    Shiva's Cosmic Dance at CERN -
    Last edited by observer; 2nd October 2015 at 14:28. Reason: add image

  7. Link to Post #247
    UK Avalon Member Nick Matkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2012
    Posts
    1,683
    Thanks
    1,616
    Thanked 5,812 times in 1,510 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Just curious to know where project Shiva Nova at Livermore gets "many terawatts" of energy from without anyone noticing, bearing in mind the whole of North America only generates 1.2 terawatts. (Data source here.)

  8. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Nick Matkin For This Post:

    betoobig (2nd October 2015), heyokah (2nd October 2015), observer (2nd October 2015)

  9. Link to Post #248
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    20th March 2010
    Location
    Within a few kilometers of Avalon
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,702
    Thanks
    3,990
    Thanked 7,178 times in 1,466 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by Nick Matkin (here)
    Just curious to know where project Shiva Nova at Livermore gets "many terawatts" of energy from without anyone noticing, bearing in mind the whole of North America only generates 1.2 terawatts. (Data source here.)
    Good question Nick,

    Perhaps Bill Ryan can answer that question for you.

    I would suspect Livermore got it's ability to generate 1.2 terawatts the same way CERN is able to generate 13 TeV (teraelectron volts) of energy for its current ongoing experiment.

    You may find an answer, here. Although, that link didn't really answer it for me, leading my suspicion to "unknown technology". The global elite are at least 50 years ahead of the general public's understanding of technological capabilities.

  10. Link to Post #249
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    38,793
    Thanks
    277,920
    Thanked 516,264 times in 37,330 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by observer (here)
    Here's a quote from Bill Ryan's first [I believe] interview with Henry Deacon, found here.

    Quote [My emphasis]-
    [Henry]- There's a project called Shiva Nova at Livermore which uses arrays of giant lasers. These are huge lasers, huge capacitors, many terawatts of energy, in a building built on giant springs [extends his arms to show the size], all focused on a tiny tiny point. This creates a fusion reaction which replicates certain conditions for nuclear weapons testing. It’s like a nuke test in lab conditions, and there's very powerful data collection focused on that point where all the energy is focused.

    The problem is that all extremely high-energy events like this create rips in the fabric of spacetime. This was observed back in the early Hiroshima and Nagasaki events, and you can even see it in the old movies. Look for what looks like an expanding energy sphere, and I can send you a link to show you. The problem with creating rips in spacetime, whether they're big or little, is that things get in that you don’t want to be there.

    [Bill]- Things get in?

    [Henry]- Things get in. Things that we all know about that are discussed on the net a lot. Beings, and influences, and all kinds of weird stuff, and I can tell you they’ve created big problems.

    [Bill]- What kind of problems?

    [Henry]- [pause]
    The problem of their presence and then what happens next. The other problem is that if you’re creating rips in spacetime you’re messing with time itself, whether you mean to or not. There have been attempts to fix that, and it all results in a complicated overlay of time loops. Some ETs are trying to help, and others, others are not. When predicting futures, we can only talk about probable and possible futures. This is all extremely complex and very highly classified. Basically, it’s just a huge mess. We've opened Pandora’s Box, starting with the Manhattan Project, and we haven't yet found a way to deal with the consequences.
    CERN is a continuation of this "[Dance of] Shiva Nova" Project. Henry's testimony is directly related to what they are doing at CERN.

    Yes. Of interest, Henry said several times that there was nothing being done in the public domain now that hadn't already been done 20 years ago behind the scenes — including huge projects like CERN.

    He always maintained that the alternative media focus on CERN was way over-hyped.

  11. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    Atlas (19th October 2015), Elainie (2nd October 2015), heyokah (2nd October 2015), Limor Wolf (2nd October 2015), LittleTree (2nd October 2015), observer (2nd October 2015), Redstar Kachina (20th October 2015)

  12. Link to Post #250
    UK Avalon Member Nick Matkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2012
    Posts
    1,683
    Thanks
    1,616
    Thanked 5,812 times in 1,510 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by observer (here)
    Quote Posted by Nick Matkin (here)
    Just curious to know where project Shiva Nova at Livermore gets "many terawatts" of energy from without anyone noticing, bearing in mind the whole of North America only generates 1.2 terawatts. (Data source here.)
    Good question Nick,

    Perhaps Bill Ryan can answer that question for you.

    I would suspect Livermore got it's ability to generate 1.2 terawatts the same way CERN is able to generate 13 TeV (teraelectron volts) of energy for its current ongoing experiment.

    You may find an answer, here. Although, that link didn't really answer it for me, leading my suspicion to "unknown technology". The global elite are at least 50 years ahead of the general public's understanding of technological capabilities.
    Electron volts are not a unit of power (note - not energy), though is often used that way to 'big-up' stories. It's a charge on individual subatomic particles.

    The following illustration is from How much is 1 electron-volt (eV)?

    Quote One TeV (a tera electron volt) is about the energy of motion of a flying mosquito. [13 tera electron volts is the power of 13 flying mosquitoes!]

    When you lift up your 2.5Kg laptop (a 15-inch apple macbook pro, for example) by a foot, you do a work of approximately 2.5Kg×10ms−2×0.3m=7.5J which is about 4.7×10^19eV. So an eV is a really low energy scale by everyday standards.
    Kinda puts things into perspective.

    (The trouble with explaining things is that the scary stuff tends to disappear!)
    Last edited by Nick Matkin; 2nd October 2015 at 17:30.

  13. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Nick Matkin For This Post:

    Cara (26th November 2015), heyokah (23rd October 2015), Humanbean (22nd October 2015), LittleTree (2nd October 2015), observer (2nd October 2015)

  14. Link to Post #251
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    20th March 2010
    Location
    Within a few kilometers of Avalon
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,702
    Thanks
    3,990
    Thanked 7,178 times in 1,466 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by Nick Matkin (here)

    [....snip]

    (The trouble with explaining things is that the scary stuff tends to disappear!)
    And yet, even at what you describe as low levels of energy, Nick, the current experiment seems to be punching holes into other dimensions - go figure.

    In my comment #246 I mentioned an observed phenomenon going back to the "Philadelphia Experiment":

    Quote Posted by observer (here)

    [....snip]

    I've heard of this high energy time distortion phenomenon being described in discussions of the "Philadelphia Experiment", where the project all began when observations of time distortions were noted during extremely high amperage welding operations experienced during battle ship repairs.
    Years ago when I read this, I took notice. Allegedly, welders were using equipment powerful enough to weld a single pass in 4" steel armor plating. I don't even know how many amps of power that would require, but allegedly at those levels, tools in the welding shop began disappearing. According to the story, this began the investigation into the Philadelphia Experiment.

    If true, one can be certain all of these events are connected.

    How Livermore attained the power levels that Henry Deacon reported? Only Henry can answer that.

    I believe Bill gave a reasonable suggestion:

    Quote "Henry said several times that there was nothing being done in the public domain now that hadn't already been done 20 years ago behind the scenes — including huge projects like CERN." - Bill Ryan
    I'm not so concerned with nit-picking details regarding reported energy levels, I'm more focused on the results of the experiments - which appear to have nothing to do with finding Higgs Bosons.
    Last edited by observer; 2nd October 2015 at 18:16. Reason: add link

  15. Link to Post #252
    Brazil Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th April 2013
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,453
    Thanks
    11,308
    Thanked 7,529 times in 1,350 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Hey observer.

    Based on your idea, it added a more dramatic ending.
    I also added the expiral moving in the middle.

    Thank you.

    Naste.


    Cern Project with Black Hole

  16. Link to Post #253
    United States Avalon Member Wide-Eyed's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th July 2015
    Posts
    330
    Thanks
    2,777
    Thanked 1,018 times in 274 posts
    Last edited by Wide-Eyed; 5th October 2015 at 02:46. Reason: mo stuff

  17. Link to Post #254
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    20th March 2010
    Location
    Within a few kilometers of Avalon
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,702
    Thanks
    3,990
    Thanked 7,178 times in 1,466 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Thanks Wide,

    My "quick reply" would be: "the data speaks for itself"!

  18. Link to Post #255
    UK Avalon Member Cidersomerset's Avatar
    Join Date
    16th May 2011
    Location
    Bridgwater somerset UK
    Age
    65
    Posts
    22,333
    Thanks
    33,460
    Thanked 79,815 times in 18,702 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    CERN Scientists Hope to Make Contact With a Parallel Universe Using the Large Hadron Collider
    By David Icke on 19th October 2015

    The Large Hadron Collider at CERN will be taken up to it’s highest energy levels next
    week in a bid to detect or even create a miniature black hole.They hope to rewrite the
    physics books and philosophy books too by contacting a parallel universe.

    Read more: CERN Scientists Hope to Make Contact With a Parallel Universe Using the Large Hadron Collider

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    CERN HOPE TO OPEN/CONTACT PARALLEL UNIVERSE THIS WEEK! AND MAKE BLACK HOLES!



    Published on 18 Oct 2015

    http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/5...

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




    Scientists at Large Hadron Collider hope to make contact with PARALLEL UNIVERSE in days

    SCIENTISTS conducting a mindbending experiment at the Large Hadron Collider next
    week hope to connect with a PARALLEL UNIVERSE outside of our own.
    By Paul Baldwin
    PUBLISHED: 00:49, Sat, Oct 17, 2015 | UPDATED: 13:26, Sat, Oct 17, 2015


    Collision course: Large Hadron Collider could discover parallel universe

    The staggeringly complex LHC ‘atom smasher’ at the CERN centre in Geneva,
    Switzerland, will be fired up to its highest energy levels ever in a bid to detect - or even
    create - miniature black holes.If successful a completely new universe will be revealed –
    rewriting not only the physics books but the philosophy books too.It is even possible
    that gravity from our own universe may ‘leak’ into this parallel universe, scientists at
    the LHC say.The experiment is sure to inflame alarmist critics of the LHC, many of
    whom initially warned the high energy particle collider would spell the end of our
    universe with the creation a black hole of its own.

    But so far Geneva remains intact and comfortably outside the event horizon.

    Indeed the LHC has been spectacularly successful. First scientists proved the existence
    of the elusive Higgs boson ‘God particle’ - a key building block of the universe - and it is
    seemingly well on the way to nailing ‘dark matter’ - a previously undetectable
    theoretical possibility that is now thought to make up the majority of matter in the
    universe.

    But next week’s experiment is considered to be a game changer.

    Mir Faizal, one of the three-strong team of physicists behind the experiment, said: “Just
    as many parallel sheets of paper, which are two dimensional objects [breadth and
    length] can exist in a third dimension [height], parallel universes can also exist in
    higher dimensions.

    “We predict that gravity can leak into extra dimensions, and if it does, then miniature
    black holes can be produced at the LHC. "Normally, when people think of the
    multiverse, they think of the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics, where
    every possibility is actualised.

    "This cannot be tested and so it is philosophy and not science.

    “This is not what we mean by parallel universes. What we mean is real universes in
    extra dimensions.


    Atom art: An image of two protons smashed together at the LHC


    “As gravity can flow out of our universe into the extra dimensions, such a model can be
    tested by the detection of mini black holes at the LHC.

    “We have calculated the energy at which we expect to detect these mini black holes
    in ‘gravity's rainbow’ [a new scientific theory].

    “If we do detect mini black holes at this energy, then we will know that both gravity's
    rainbow and extra dimensions are correct."

    When the LHC is fired up the energy is measured in Tera electron volts – a TeV is
    1,000,000,000,000, or one trillion, electron Volts

    So far, the LHC has searched for mini black holes at energy levels below 5.3 TeV.

    But the latest study says this is too low.

    Instead, the model predicts that black holes may form at energy levels of at least 9.5
    TeV in six dimensions and 11.9 TeV in 10 dimensions.

    http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/...IVERSE-in-days
    Last edited by Cidersomerset; 19th October 2015 at 09:54.

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Cidersomerset For This Post:

    naste.de.lumina (20th October 2015), observer (19th October 2015)

  20. Link to Post #256
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    20th March 2010
    Location
    Within a few kilometers of Avalon
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,702
    Thanks
    3,990
    Thanked 7,178 times in 1,466 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    ^^^^
    Just in time for Halloween, and the Taurids Meteor Shower, Cider.

    It was the Taurids, which are the remnants of the comet Encke, that Gram Hancock believes caused the last ice age, and the last mass extension of most life on the planet. Gram goes over all this in his new book, "Magicians of the Gods". Strange how the name, Comet Encke, has an eerily close resemblance to the God, Enki, the Sumerian Destroyer God.

  21. Link to Post #257
    UK Avalon Member Nick Matkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2012
    Posts
    1,683
    Thanks
    1,616
    Thanked 5,812 times in 1,510 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    There was a large solar flare that caused all this and the resulting geomagnetic storm created another display of the Aurora Borealis. Nothing to do with CERN - why does it keep getting dragged into this stuff?

    We're in the decline of Solar Cycle 24. Solar flares and CMEs tend to be a little more frequent at this point in the cycle. Ask anyone using HF radio what's going on! Things get pretty rough for a day or so, then settle down. All the observations from the world-wide network of amateur radio aficionados reveal nothing artificial. If you want to check, look up the ARRL and RSGB forums, and the Natural Radio ELF and VLF forums. Nothing there either.

    The way this stuff gets reported you'd think it has not happened before. The story in the first link is from the geomagnetic storm and aurora in September. We've already had another solar flare and aurora on 18 October. It's the sun!

    All this is much more boring than CERN (or HAARP) doing sinister stuff, but completely verifiable. Sorry to be a wet blanket!

  22. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nick Matkin For This Post:

    CD7 (19th October 2015), observer (20th October 2015)

  23. Link to Post #258
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    20th March 2010
    Location
    Within a few kilometers of Avalon
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,702
    Thanks
    3,990
    Thanked 7,178 times in 1,466 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Well Nick,

    I read the article and watched the video, found within the article, and it appears to me that there is a direct connection between the activity at CERN and the observed "distortion in the magnetosphere" mentioned in both the article, and the video.

    Are you suggesting this was simply a coincidence? That the obvious synchronicity of the events (that relating to the CERN activity and the magnetosphere distortion observed) are simply the activity of the sun with no connection to the activity at CERN? Or, perhaps the data being reported in the video, has somehow been cooked? Are you saying, on that day of September 9, there was a solar flare at exactly the same time CERN was active, and that is what caused the distortion in the magnetosphere, with no connection to the CERN activity, whatsoever? I'm not certain what you are implying.

    Should there have been a solar flare at exactly the same time, on the same day, as the observations from the video, could that flare also have been a result of the quantum entanglement being triggered at CERN. Is there a possibility that same entanglement is causing ramifications throughout the universe? Can anyone among the members answer these questions? Do the physicists at CERN really know what Genie they are releasing from the lamp? Any "wet blankets" notwithstanding.
    Last edited by observer; 20th October 2015 at 02:31. Reason: clarity

  24. Link to Post #259
    Spain Avalon Member betoobig's Avatar
    Join Date
    13th May 2014
    Location
    Burgos, Spain
    Age
    53
    Posts
    1,963
    Thanks
    26,089
    Thanked 11,323 times in 1,855 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    CERN's Orion Stargate

    Decoding Large Hadron Collider

    By Goro Adachi
    October 08, 2015
    (Last revised on October 19, 2015)
    Introduction

    If something is obvious, chances are it's already been discovered. That would be the case especially for the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) which has attracted so much attention not just from scientists but also from suspicious conspiracy theorists, curious alternative researchers and anyone one else interested in the biggest machine ever built by mankind. It's been several years since the LHC went operational in 2008 and you would think anything significant that can be said about it has already been said. Well, you would be wrong.
    more..
    http://www.supertorchritual.com/unde..._Stargate.html
    enjoy
    honoring White Feather: SHIFT HAPPENED

  25. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to betoobig For This Post:

    heyokah (22nd October 2015), observer (20th October 2015)

  26. Link to Post #260
    UK Avalon Member Nick Matkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2012
    Posts
    1,683
    Thanks
    1,616
    Thanked 5,812 times in 1,510 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by observer (here)
    Well Nick,

    I read the article and watched the video, found within the article, and it appears to me that there is a direct connection between the activity at CERN and the observed "distortion in the magnetosphere" mentioned in both the article, and the video.

    Are you suggesting this was simply a coincidence? That the obvious synchronicity of the events (that relating to the CERN activity and the magnetosphere distortion observed) are simply the activity of the sun with no connection to the activity at CERN? Or, perhaps the data being reported in the video, has somehow been cooked? Are you saying, on that day of September 9, there was a solar flare at exactly the same time CERN was active, and that is what caused the distortion in the magnetosphere, with no connection to the CERN activity, whatsoever? I'm not certain what you are implying.

    Should there have been a solar flare at exactly the same time, on the same day, as the observations from the video, could that flare also have been a result of the quantum entanglement being triggered at CERN. Is there a possibility that same entanglement is causing ramifications throughout the universe? Can anyone among the members answer these questions? Do the physicists at CERN really know what Genie they are releasing from the lamp? Any "wet blankets" notwithstanding.
    Our sun is a slightly variable star. It has an approximately 11-year cycle of activity. These cycles were first recognised in the 1700s - that's when we started counting them. It's during these peaks that most activity (flares, CMEs etc.) takes place.

    There has only been one non-solar effect on the ionosphere in recent times that I know of. That was a sudden ionospheric disturbance (usually caused by a solar flare) from some star in the late 1980s or early 1990s. It was noted at my place of work and caused quite a stir, not least because it happened on the night side of Earth.

    Anyway, the point is that the cause of disturbances in the ionosphere and magnetosphere is the sun. Imagine the amount of energy required to do this artificially? I dare say there can be found to be some correlation between these evens and the operation of CERN. But what caused them before CERN was even built?

    If you do find any correlations (and down to what level of disturbances will you include?) don't forget the difference between correlation and causation - something often confused by journalists, politicians and the public at large.
    Last edited by Nick Matkin; 22nd October 2015 at 11:29.

  27. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Nick Matkin For This Post:

    betoobig (22nd October 2015), heyokah (22nd October 2015), observer (22nd October 2015)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 13 of 20 FirstFirst 1 3 13 20 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts