Posted by Bill Ryan
(here)
Posted by mojo
(here)
My point is that if being placed in the situation that Corey claims he was I'm sure that I could find some way to prove my testimony.
Yes. Visiting a competent, qualified regression therapist would be a good start, with sessions recorded and transcribed.
That'd be
really easy to do (and would make for a compelling TV episode!), but he's never once done that.
(Many contactees and abductees have, of course. That very greatly supports their credibility.)
Back in September/October 2014, when his conversations with Christine at his house were first recorded (and contrary to what Corey claims, there was absolutely no pressure on him to go public, just encouragement and support), Corey had very limited memory of just about everything. He had just enough personal information to share for no more than a couple of hours of edited audio.
Now, he presents literally
dozens of hours of detailed information about stuff he never once mentioned, or seemed to know about, back when he first went on record.
Where did all that come from? Corey's not saying. That's pretty important for any researcher to know, as part of the due diligence.
No serious researchers are giving this any time at all apart from Wilcock and Michael Salla. Not one other. On the contrary, many are politely but privately scathing.
I consider Michael Salla a friend (I met him a few times, and he's a good man who always means well), and I wrote to him offering more background information about Corey. I told him, privately, I was concerned he was compromising his own good reputation.
Although Michael is a trained academic, and should be collecting data of every kind as routine, he did NOT want to know more about anything I was offering to share.
Coming from a researcher, that was a little hard to understand. He replied [my paraphrase] that he was committed to Corey's story, and wasn't going to turn back. That sounded to me more like an emotional stance than a cautious, research-based, professional one.
In my personal opinion, that may not have been very wise, and I do think he may come to regret that later when the entire thing implodes, as it well might. It may be impossible to disprove, but just as impossible to verify — and as such it has the same kind of provenance as any of the many contactee books published in the 1950s.
They're interesting and entertaining, but they're almost all 100% unverifiable — and taken together
en masse, contain a lot of contradictions... meaning, they just can't all be correct, as they often state or claim very different things.
What that means is that this entire tangle of personal, subjective reports is of little use to any serious researchers... and the CIA (or whichever agency owns the remit to confuse the amateur UFO community) is no doubt delighted.
They don't even have to confuse us themselves (and that's assuming none of the bad information is planted)... we're doing a perfectly fine job unaided.
Re: David Wilcock/Corey Goode Interview- Jan 2016 - Secret Space Program, ET Disclosure, Inner Earth
its corrective clarity.. 
Bookmarks