WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Quickly, before I go to work. One of the principles of speciation, which is still poorly understood, is that geographical isolation is what causes species to branch off. Members of a species become isolated, they evolve to adapt to their environment, and they become a different species than their parent species, and continue along their branch of evolution.

On land, species become isolated in two ways: they move, or the land moves. Since mammals evolved from reptiles, the earliest mammals laid eggs:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monotreme

and there are still egg-laying mammals in the Southern Hemisphere, although there are not many of them. Again, reproducing via live birth or by egg-laying seems to have been a cost-benefit “decision.” Most mammals alive today are called placental mammals.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placental

The first marsupial fossils have been found in China, where the first placental mammal fossils have been found. At this time, placental mammals seem to have appeared some 30-40 million years before marsupials.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marsupial#Evolution

What happened many times is that animals either migrated from their place of origin, or the land moved, and the “homeland” animals died out, and the “migrants” survived. The fossil history provides many examples of those radiations, speciations, and extinctions. Today, it is thought that all of today’s marsupials once called South America home. Marsupials came to dominate in Antarctica, Australia and South America, while placental mammals dominated the Northern Hemisphere.

Marsupial reproduction had advantages over placental reproduction in that there was less risk to the mother. There was still a live birth, but the offspring was far from viable, and being raised in its mother’s pouch, with a ready milk supply, was the marsupial way. Placental mammals had different brains, which we humans probably have to thank for our “intelligence.”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_callosum

Today, the leading theory on evolution of the great apes is that the collision of India into Asia ended up severing orangutans from the other evolving great apes, which is why orangs are so far from their African cousins.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orangut...y_and_genetics

I cannot overemphasize that even where evolutionary theory seems to be well-founded, there is still plenty of controversy in orthodoxy, such as the notion that orangs are more closely-related to humans than chimpanzees are:

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0618084304.htm

It is a very minority position, and when it comes to the ancestry of humanity, the battles can become fiercer than in any other area of evolutionary theory.

But, the principle of geographical isolation leading to speciation is not very controversial in evolutionary circles. That “hobbit” human species discovered recently:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_floresiensis

is a product of geographical isolation on islands, which has been called island dwarfing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insular_dwarfism

But I get ahead of myself. Long before protohumans appeared on the scene, marsupials thrived in the Southern Hemisphere for many millions of years. As I wrote earlier, New Zealand was dominated by birds, as they were about the only animals that could repopulate those islands after the Cretaceous impact event.

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...and#post531531

About forty million years ago, as Antarctica kept moving southward and the Earth cooled, likely due to falling carbon dioxide levels, it began forming its icecap.

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post532053

That trend eventually wiped out all virtually life on Antarctica, ground out of existence by the ice. Australia was dominated by marsupials, and as with the Northern Hemisphere’s placental mammals, they grew some pretty huge ones.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Austral...una#Marsupials

while South America’s marsupials were smaller, as placental mammals dominated the ecological niches. That world’s largest bird that I previously mentioned lived in South America:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argentavis

Large animals have many advantages over small ones, mainly energy-efficiency, in the end, and larger animals dominating the ecosystems goes all the way back to the earliest days of life invading land from the oceans.

South America had a marvelous diversity of life, which largely ended about three million years ago, when the land bridge formed between North and South America. That event led to what is called the Great American Interchange:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_American_Interchange

The North American mammals dominated that mixing, and most of the South American marsupials went extinct. It is thought that the North American mammals were the product of more vigorous evolutionary competition, and the placental brain gave them an advantage over their marsupial cousins. In a word, they were smarter. The only marsupial that really thrived in North America is the opossum, due to its omnivorous diet. Omnivores, such as monkeys and bears, can survive lean times that kill off more specialized eaters.

The Great American interchange allowed one highly successful animal to migrate to new land: elephants. The stegomastodon and the cuvieronius

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stegomastodon

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuvieronius

thrived in South America for millions of years, until humans arrived, and they quickly went extinct. Those who deny the human agency in the megafaunal extinctions, as humans conquered all of Earth’s ecosystems, have tended to focus obsessively on the elephants that lived near the ice sheets of North America and northern Eurasia, while the elephants of South America are virtually ignored. The South American elephants did not have to contend with advancing and retreating ice sheets, and had survived literally dozens of ice age episodes in fine shape (and some of the episodes more extreme than our recent interglacial interval), to only go extinct soon after humans arrived, and archeologists have found plenty of evidence that humans killed those elephants:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuvieronius#South_America

and all the other megafauna went extinct, too:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quatern...#South_America

The climate change hypothesis for all of those South American megafaunal extinctions I consider to be a strained bit of theorizing.

Even the Northern Hemisphere’s mammoths survived on isolated islands, thousands of years after their continental cousins went extinct:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wrangel...auna_and_flora

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saint_P...atural_history

at least until humans arrived.

Of course, the human collective ego has great resistance to admitting that humans were responsible for the extinction of the world’s megafauna.

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/upcoming.htm#_edn5

The only big megafauna that survived were in Africa and Asia, where they evolved alongside humans and learned to fear and avoid them.

But I need to back up again, and upcoming is the evolution of humans. Again, this is probably the most controversial area of evolutionary theory, not the least of which has been the Bible-bangers and their agenda, but humans tend to be reluctant to admit that we are apes:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...zee#post528110

We want to be special, whether we are the flower of evolution or the apple of God’s eye. In that regard, the egocentrism of the religionists and the scientists are close allies, and their worldviews have justified endless evils against our fellow species:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/conun.htm#_edn6

The racism that Europeans used to justify their depredations is merely a variation of the theme. There has been a healthy trend in evolutionary circles that calls humans “Just another species.” That is a very helpful perspective that can help deflate the endemic arrogance of our species.

Off to work.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I would likely to briefly recap a little, energy-wise. Chemical energy is stored in electron shells. The further the electron is from the nucleus, the more energy is stored. It has been likened to a waterfall. The higher the waterfall, the more energy is released by the fall of the water. When photosynthesis captures light, the photon knocks an electron further from its nucleus, thereby storing energy. That stored energy is used to run the chemical reactions of life, in waterfall-like fashion. Sunlight provides the energy to raise the water to the top of the waterfall.

The earliest life on Earth was not photosynthetic, but used the energy stored in the elements in Earth’s interior. Before complex life existed, and all that lived on Earth were single-celled bacteria and archaea, biochemistry was quite diverse. Although all life on Earth is DNA-based and carbon-based, that early life figured out many ways to wring chemical energy from its environment.

The sulfur eaters are what Peter Ward thinks may have led to several mass extinction events:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sulfate-reducing_bacteria

there are hydrogen eaters:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydroge...izing_bacteria

iron eaters:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acidoph..._mine_drainage

ammonia eaters:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microbi...bolism#Anammox

even manganese eaters:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chemotr...izing_bacteria

Without those tiny organisms, life as we know it would not exist, because only bacteria can take nitrogen from the atmosphere and incorporate it into life processes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nitrogen_fixation

The cyanobacteria made the oxygen that made complex life possible:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Oxygenation_Event

and it is thought that the resulting ozone layer prevented the oceans (more specifically, hydrogen) from being lost to space. There are other hypothesized chemical bases for life in the universe:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hypothe...f_biochemistry

but carbon-based life, with water as the solvent and DNA as the transmitter of information, is the only kind of life on Earth.

And when complex cells developed, by single-cell organisms enveloping each other, the diversity of life chemistry ended, and complex life used only one primary energy-generation system: oxygenic respiration, because it generated the levels of energy necessary to sustain the complexity of multicellular organisms. From a biochemist’s perspective, life got rather boring when complex life took over. Those single-celled organisms did not go extinct, but they largely could only survive where there was no oxygen. Those organisms are called anaerobic, and as Peter Ward and others have made the case, the mass extinction events might be called the revenge of the microbes, as the conditions were ripe for them to thrive again, and the sulfur-eaters in particular made life hard on everything else:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medea_hypothesis

when scientists study mass extinctions, evolution, and why one life form came to dominate over another one, it was almost always an energy story. The life form that excelled in acquiring, preserving and more efficiently using its energy would “win.” Flowering plants are an example. The gymnosperms were the first on the scene. Their reproductive strategy was for the male pollen to get scattered in the air, seeking the female seeds. It is not a very efficient way to “mate.” Flowering plants came along and provided nectar-buckets that insects in particular ate, and they would inadvertently pick up pollen as they fed, and bring the pollen to another flower, and thereby help the plants mate much faster than gymnosperms. The fertilized seed would grow, surrounded by fruit, which also attracted animals, and as they made off with the fruit, they helped spread the seeds. All of the warm, wet climates on Earth are dominated by flowering plants, with the gymnosperms, conifers in particular, relegated to the cooler or dryer climates. The conifer forests that I delight in hiking in are actually relatively rare on Earth. I am attaching two photos from my hike last weekend. See that bee with the pollen wrapped around its legs? It is doin’ plant work. The symbiosis between plants and animals has not gotten any better than the “deal” that flowering plants made with animals attracted to the nectar, pollen, seeds, and fruit.

After the dinosaurs got wiped out by that bolide impact, the mammals quickly evolved from their rat-like state, huddled in their burrows, and many ended up in the trees, in a pollen-and-fruit-based ecosystem. The first primate appeared then a little less than sixty million years ago, living in the trees:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plesiadapis

and importantly for the eventual appearance of humans, many primates developed opposable thumbs that allowed them to navigate in the trees, procure food, groom themselves, and so on. Hands became pretty handy!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Primate...shing_features

Fruit became the basis for those arboreal ecosystems, and primates also ate the insects that came for the flowering plant bounty, too. The arboreal environment also demanded three-dimensional navigation, so their eyes began to move forward in their heads to provide binocular vision. Their brains also became larger, for reasons that are still controversial, but are thought to be adaptations to the arboreal environment. Navigating in the trees is also thought to have produced a more upright posture.

As we will see, those attributes of primates led to the eventual appearance of apes that left the trees. But it is off to work for now.

Best,

Wade

[sandy]

Thank you The Wandering Pondering,

What a great post and I couldn't agree more. Just had the most fantastic weekend with my Granddaughters who I haven't spent time with in over 3 years>>>>>>>>>>>>it was like we were never apart and Love just carried us through to the next moment of being together.

LOVE is everything and when LOVE is the agenda and intent in our communications and behavior, the world will come together in ways we on this thread at least dream and visualize. Thank you for the wonderful pictures I created while reading your post.

Posted by A Wandering Ponderer (here)

Posted by mariposafe (here)
..I can see why lots of people argue that free energy will be the precursor to a paradigm shift, but I can't help thinking that surely it's the other way round. We (as a species) won't embrace free energy and abundance until we've realised that scarcity is not a done deal and that a state of competition is not necessarily the only way for us to exist together. Are we biologically/physically able to do this ?

Thank you for commenting Mariposafe. What I want to say isn't in direct response to your comment, but you words inspired some thoughts. I can't claim to be saying anything new, but I'm grateful to have a place to share what comes to mind.

There seem to be many cases where technology enters into the mainstream that seems to influence how many of us perceive, function and communicate dramatically. The printing press, television, the internet. The changes are tangible. Despite the fact that technology advancements have not given us the ideal world they could have (we still have war, disease and people work even longer hours), we have still moved forward. I know it can seem like the more things change the more they merely stay the same, but even though its saddening to look at a technology that should have taken us ten steps forward and think how it only took us one or two steps (and even did some damage), the fact is... those one or two steps still took us forward and they still count.

Of course, unlike free-energy, all these inventions (which are tiny in comparison) had the benefit of having powerful entities allow and even encourage them because they felt (or soon realised) they could engineer the use of the inventions to support the status quo that kept them powerful. Perhaps the internet is the exception because of the revolutionary, possibly unexpected, way it has freed up the exchange of information between individuals on such a vast scale. If it has been more of an asset to our growth than was predicted, then perhaps that is a sign that a shift in our collective consciousness is indeed occurring for the better. If that's true, it would be proof that we can change. I feel like many people are trapped in accepting our destructive/competitive scarcity-based thinking as an unchangeable aspect of life because they do not see an alternative. For many of us it is painful to acknowledge a problem exists if we cannot see the solution straight away, or can just about see it but fear we lack the strength to implement it. So if enough of us can see it, and support each other in seeing it, if we can hold the vision and share the vision, then we can help bring it forward so that gradually others will have the courage to lift their heads and see what is possible. On my better days I don't resent them for being unaware, I look forward to the day when they feel free to let go of the old illusions - so they can remember who they really are.

Often I look at people who act aggressively due to a rigid, scarcity-based mind-set and my first thought is how different they might have been if they had grown up and been nurtured in a world where there was enough for everyone; in a world where they had not had to fight so hard. I look at them and see their body transformed, their scars dissolve, their muscles relax. I imagine all the good memories of wonderful times replacing all the imprints of hard, bitter difficulties, and the light returning to their eyes. I believe, deep down, that healed world is what we all want for ourselves and others, even though we get caught up in our fear of what we've become and how we fear we may not have the strength to change ourselves. I'm often frustrated by how my own scarcity-based fears surface in my thoughts or behaviour when I thought I knew better. When I remember how many of those fears have been compounded by the culture around me it just makes me want a global solution even more. Even if its too late for me to heal some of the damage done from growing in this environment, it is not too late for many people, especially the children; and it is not too late to physically clean-up this beautiful planet and show our gratitude. That's why I'm grateful for this thread, and for all you for being here, and sharing this vision. As someone once said, where focus goes, energy flows. This small seed can grow in to an awe-inspiring, life-giving Oak, ringed with time and patience and strength. We are not the only ones believing in and examining these solutions, and the numbers are growing ever-larger, every day. We are changing, simply because we want to, and because we want to enough.

[sandy]

Hi Wade,

It sure becomes more and more apparent that the world is truly ONE with your writings of our intrigue history as energy connects us all. The need to attain it starts right from the first forms of life on earth and depicts one species delineating another to have it. And so it continues to this day.

This is what makes me believe their is a greater agenda to the story of earth and that the process and journey is what we are all about in many ways. As much as I would like to believe that on mass we can make the change without the advent of the implementation of Free Energy it is not possible. We do not have the luxury of time on our side and it seems to me that "Mother Earth" will soon be calling the shots for us all (including the Globalists) if something is not changed in the near future.

Hi Mariposafe As someone who grew up in poverty and an alcoholic dysfunctional home, then emulating what I learned and having to change it all around I hear what you are saying about what Humans in survival mode are capable of. The good, if there is any, quickly goes out the window and one operates on the bad and ugly to stay alive!

We have many operating from this mode in life here on earth and the mindset is deep and the belief systems are all encompassing. Many don't even know, let alone envision another road as survival is the name of the game. This is why IMHO we need Free Energy implemented to make any change in this world.

I also think there is no other alternative as without taking the stress off of people enough that they can dream a little or think there could be something better, the masses are not going to change. Most can't get out of the box they are in, never mind think there might be more than one box!

Free Energy will be a paradigm changer for sure and it will be a process just as life is today. However changing to the advent of abundance on earth is a process that is just as real as the process we are in today, only today's process is taking us to the ultimate end of extinction. I prefer to take my chances in the Abundance Paradigm and some of the challenges that will go along with it. I want a future for my grandchildren and their children, etc. to possibly experience 'Heaven or Paradise' right here on earth rather than what YOU or I and many others have had to experience.

If we can't affect this change our life including the bad and ugly is going to look like a piece of cake for what is to come to our youth without FREE ENERGY.

And as Wade says, "it starts in the heart" and taking stress away softens the heart therefore FE can be the catalyst to moving the masses to a safer more cooperative civilization rather than the highly competitive one we now experience.

[Wade Frazier]

Sandy, my sister, do you ever get it. So happy you are here.

Love,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

OK, back to life. One of the earliest hints that there might be a phenomenon such as plate tectonics was the way that Africa and South America seemed to fit together like pieces of a jigsaw puzzle.

http://www.msnucleus.org/membership/.../ptpt1_3a.html

The current theory is that they split about 120 million years ago.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platyrrhini#Origin

But there is evidence that dinosaurs were able to migrate between the split continents:

http://www.redorbit.com/news/science...gether_longer/

There is similar evidence that the New World monkeys came from Africa in similar fashion:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_World_monkey#Origin

about forty million years ago. The leading theory is that there was a land bridge in the newly forming Atlantic Ocean, but maybe the ETs moved them! (or they migrated across Atlantis)

Once the New World monkeys were established, they had a distinctly different evolutionary path than Old World monkeys. With only a few exceptions, New World monkeys do not have opposable thumbs. They are the only monkeys with prehensile tails, however.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehens...ehensile_tails

Other animals have different prehensile body parts:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prehensile

Being able to grab something has great advantages. That ability likely helped monkey brains grow. The only New World monkey family with opposable thumbs also has the New World monkey with the largest brain, and the smartest New World monkey, that uses tools and can even make stone tools:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_C...nd_manufacture

A key aspect of primate tool-making seems to be if they are on the ground and their hands are freed. This would have epochal importance for proto-humans. Free the hands, set them to work, and there is a positive feedback on brain development.

http://www.nytimes.com/books/first/w/wilson-hand.html

It is thought today that increasing tool use and enlarging brains co-evolved.

Animals have developed different ways to create synergies by acting in groups:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collective_animal_behavior

It usually had an energy reason. I want to make it clear that if an animal successfully avoids being preyed upon, that is an energy victory. It enabled the animal to preserve its own energy, and prevent it from becoming an energy source for the predator. To avoid becoming prey is the ultimate energy-preservation activity.

Insects engage in group behaviors, some highly specialized, such as with ants, termites and bees. Scientists do not credit those insects with much intelligence, and theorize that their complex societies evolved without much intelligence guiding the operation. The mystic is not so sure. That gets into species consciousness, devas, and other areas that materialistic White Science is currently unable to explore. I will certainly give a nod to those ideas, as hard as they can be to study in the White Science way. As I have stated before, Black Science is not as materialistic as White Science is. They use psychotronic technology, often in evil fashion:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/journey.htm#adamiak

and have reverse-engineered “captured” ET craft, and engaged in other activities that leave the materialistic framework of White Science far behind. As I have stated plenty, Black Science is so far ahead of White Science:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/camelot.htm#underground

that the physical principles of Black Science render the White Science textbooks something akin to cave drawings at times. I already did a bunch of posts on White Science, Fringe Science and Black Science:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post504316

and I won’t belabor it here, but I just want to make the point that White Science is far from figuring it all out, or even having the tools and approach to do so. It has nothing to say these days on group consciousness, souls, and so on, and its practitioners generally prefer to believe that such things do not exist. More than 90% of White Scientists are functional atheists.

The mystic will say that bee hives and ant colonies participate in hive awareness. All members are part of the hive awareness. That certainly does not mean that they are all automatons. White Scientists have found ants that shirk their duties, fake being productive, getting a free ride from the system. A**holery is not the sole province of humans.

But scientists who study monkeys see much in them that can be eerily reminiscent of human behavior. Monkeys are generally highly social animals, living in groups of up to a couple hundred members. They have hierarchies and can have Machiavellian plotting. Chimpanzees can, too, but on a level that can be painfully primitive to human observers. The so-called herd instinct is part of the human heritage, and I call it pre-sentient behavior. When people are in fear, they often retreat to pre-sentient behaviors, as they are focused on survival. That is why America abdicated its collective sentience after 9/11, mindlessly waving their flags and cheering the invasion of a nation that had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/america.htm#wtc

add in the well-founded suspicion that 9/11 likely had help from high places:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/cover-up.htm#sept11

and it is easy to get the impression that the American people are a big herd that is stampeded this way and that, whichever way the social managers want them to stampede. We may be about to stampede off the cliff:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/conun.htm#question

It brings up the issue whether humanity is really a sentient species. Some of the greatest people I have known asked that question:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/brianmem.htm#sentience

IMO, sentience is something that humans are still learning, and it has more to do than having clever hands and being able to plot like Machiavelli, but true sentience I believe begins in the heart. This human society is as fully sentient as I have heard of:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/visions.htm#roads1

while this one:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/visions.htm#roadsblade

is completely oblivious to the herd management that it is being subjected to. They are still working on becoming sentient, IMO.

I am wandering a little in this narrative. It is off to work, and I’ll return to the evolution of monkeys, apes and humans in the coming posts.

Best,

Wade

[CdnSirian]

Thanks Sandy, love to read your reflections here.

Wade, a wee snippet I just came across and you may already know this: "Wade is of Old English and Scandinavian origin, and the meaning of Wade is "able to go; river ford," and/or "advancer."

Thanks again for your diligent and voluminous posts!

[Ilie Pandia]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
I am wandering a little in this narrative. It is off to work, and I’ll return to the evolution of monkeys, apes and humans in the coming posts.

Best,

Wade

Ok Wade,

But you'd better not conclude that we are apes, or I may have to close your account

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Ilie:

I have been thrown out of better joints than this!

Seriously, and I have stated it plenty, I’ll always be grateful to have a quasi-public platform where I am not constantly being attacked by trolls, some of whom are likely professionals. Bill’s forum is about the only one that I would trust to join, and the existence of Avalon was quite a pleasant surprise. If my work ever really goes anywhere, the Avalon days will be part of its history, and the affiliation may last a long, long time (until I get kicked out ).

Hi CdnSirian:

Ah, the name game. There has been plenty of mystical speculation about my name, both within my family and outside of it. Beats me. The Welsh “wanderer” root of Wade is one that I have been aware of for many years, but most meanings are around water.

http://www.meaning-of-baby-boy-names...ng-of-wade.htm

http://wiki.name.com/en/Wade

http://www.thinkbabynames.com/meaning/1/Wade

http://www.namesbay.org/wade

My college roommates called me a wanderer before they heard of that name root. When I read about wanderers in the Ra Material, I wondered:

http://lawofone.info/results.php?c=Wanderers

http://www.llresearch.org/wanderer.aspx

My writings can be seen as wandering.

But that guy who just mowed down several people was named Wade:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Oak_Creek_shooting

I don’t know about that name stuff. Good ol’ Chris Columbus sure lived up to his name:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/columbus.htm#name

and is probably roasting in hell for it.

My surname has also led to interesting situations. The most famous Frazier in my family is my cousin who brutally murdered his infant son a few years ago. The first prominent Fraziers in the USA were in the slave trade (for instance John Frazier, in Charleston, in the 1600s), which is why the most famous Fraziers are black, such as Joe and Walt:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joe_Frazier

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Walt_Frazier

I have a racist, redneck side of my family, and that the most famous Fraziers are black has surely caused a little ironic consternation in my family. People regularly called me "Walt" by accident when I was young.

An alleged archangel once told me that I am from a “gardener” soul group that helped design Earth school. The same one told me that I helped melt down Atlantis. The source had a lot of credibility with me (astounding predictions that came true will do that), so I don’t dismiss it, but there can sure be ego hazards with all of that.

I pretty much try to ignore it all and just get my work done. Nobody is letting me in the joke, so I keep doing what can, staying faithful to my vision, and letting the cards fall where they may.

Probably not until after I am dead will anybody really give me a clue about what this trip was for. Until then, all I can do is keep on trying.

In the next post I will try to get back on track with those monkeys and apes, at least one of which became at least semi-sentient.

Best,

Wade

[WhiteFeather]

Hey Wade: I am now seriously considering utilizing HHO cells in my 97 Sonata. Seems like there going to start hitting us pretty hard at the pump soon. Ive Been doing some research on this device that says it could boost your mileage 35 percent. Gonna give it a shot very soon. Your thoughts on this?

PS....... Wade Have you seen this news hitting mainstream in India recently?

ISLAMABAD: A Pakistani engineer has successfully developed a unique technology that uses water as fuel in vehicles instead of petrol or CNG, a feat once considered a farfetched dream. Waqar Ahmad drove his car using water as fuel on Thursday during a demonstration for Pakistani parliamentarians, scientists and students.

He claimed that on one litre of water a 1000 CC car can cover a distance of 40 km and a motorbike can run up to 150 km using this technology.

http://articles.timesofindia.indiati...gen-cng-cc-car


Peace
W.f.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi WhiteFeather:

Hydrocarbons are only going to get more expensive, as we start running out of them. There is a post over here:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post530295

and on that thread that you began:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...am-in-Pakistan

I really don’t have much to add, other than that there are many variations on stuff like that, from Brown’s Gas:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/energy.htm#yull

to Mills and his hydrinos, to good old simple hydrogen. If it is farming the ZPF, then look out. Godzilla does not take kindly to that. If it is just hydrogen from water, it is like the rest of them, and no big deal – it takes more energy to make the hydrogen than burning it produces, like biofuels. We are starting to see more Asians try to do this kind of thing, but Godzilla has a global reach. It is ZPE or bust, IMO, and tinkerers do not have a prayer, even if they are in Pakistan, India, Japan, or Iran.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Back to those monkeys and apes. Sexual dimorphism is thought to be a product of sexual selection – i.e., how animals mate:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_...hism#Evolution

The roots of the differences between men and women are millions of years old. Evolution in these matters is highly controversial. There is a branch of evolution called sociobiology:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sociobiology

which has generated heated debates. Genetics are also in the mix, and the area of gene expression is a large one:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gene_expression

As with other areas of evolution, gene expression is a tale of process and history, not intent. The great sociobiologist, E.O. Wilson, is a kind of deist, which is unusual in these realms. For a materialist critique of sociobiology, see Richard Francis’s Why Men Won’t Ask for Directions. In these scientific controversies, there can be a great deal of intelligence brought to bear, and it can take quite a while to immerse yourself deeply enough into the subject to understand the gist of the arguments and evidence, but there has been a great deal of writing by first-tier scientists with an eye to bringing the public into the arena. White scientists have been slowly learning that playing in a cloistered priesthood is not really good for the process of science. It is nice to see Peter Ward’s books, for instance, refer to popular science books written by people like Jared Diamond, Nick Lane, and William Ruddiman. And Ward’s fellow evolutionary scientists such as David Beerling and Andrew Knoll write popular science books. Understanding the gist of the situations takes some work, but you don’t need a degree in physics to understand them. In a way, I am trying to do something similar.

One thing is for sure; White Science is a long, long way from figuring it all out, and I don’t only mean that they have largely ignored consciousness so far, but in most areas of research, the scientists themselves have admitted that they have barely scratched the surface with their investigations. Over the years, I have constantly run into works where scientists propose hypotheses, or run into unexpected results and call for more research, and openly admit that they have barely begun to explore the issue.

However, their tools are logic, technology, sweat, a code of ethics, and their goal is usually a theory that can generate predictions that can be tested. That is the ideal, anyway. White Science regularly falls far short of that ideal. The scientific method is like free markets, democracy, and a free press – ideals that have never really been seen in the real world. White Science gropes toward it, however, and as long as it does not step on the toes of Black Science and goes after something highly meaningful such as FE or cancer cures, White Science is left alone to its devices. Vying for Nobel Prizes, prestigious positions in academia, and research grants are activities that corrupt the profession; so it is, in a world of scarcity.

So, back to monkeys and apes. I mentioned earlier that primates appeared a few million years after the bolide impact wiped out the dinosaurs:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post534214

and New World and Old World monkeys split about forty million years ago:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post534910

and around thirty million years ago, what we call apes today diverged from Old World Monkeys:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ape#Cla..._and_evolution

In general, apes lost their tails, and they are larger than monkeys, and their brains are more highly developed. Like all evolutionary radiations, the apes branched off, with lines rising and falling; new species appeared and old species went extinct. Scientists have estimated that the average species life expectancy is about a million years. But there is wide variation, with some living fossils surviving for far longer:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...sil#post526024

and many have far shorter spans. Many primate species have come and gone in the past sixty million years, and the branches that led to humans are almost all extinct. Apes did their own diverging, and what we call Great Apes diverged from what are known as lesser apes (gibbons) around 15-20 million years ago:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_apes

They all lived in the rainforests that ran from central Africa along southern Asia. As I stated earlier, the crashing of the Indian subcontinent into Asia is likely the main reason why what became orangutans became separated from the other great apes:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...dia#post533612

Orangs grew large brains, too. Large brains are not unique to apes. Some dolphins have proportionally larger brains than humans do, and in my circles, dolphins are considered water people:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...ins#post511613

Whales have far larger brains, and I consider it highly likely that we cannot even begin to fathom how whales think. They provided energy however, so we hunted them to the brink of extinction:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/simon.htm#whaling

I have to run to work now, but the ape narrative is now beginning, which is what Ilie has been waiting for.

Best,

Wade

[Ilie Pandia]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
Whales have far larger brains, and I consider it highly likely that we cannot even begin to fathom how whales think. They provided energy however, so we hunted them to the brink of extinction.

A short detour. This is something that I struggle with. If whales are smarter than us, how come they have allowed them to be hunted down to the brink of extinction? Why didn't they imagine ways of staying out of our reach. Do you have any thoughts on this? (Other than perhaps some mystical reasons that my human mind cannot fathom I don't understand why wouldn't they keep way from such a savage species).

[ulli]

The Osa Peninsula of Costa Rica has become a haven for whales, where they come annually to give birth to their babies.
It is already called Sala de Maternidad, or The Whale Maternity Ward.
As if they had figured it out, that Costa Rica is a country that would never hurt them.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Ilie and Ulli (I have not been able to make a greeting like that for awhile https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post188452 ):

Big subject, which I don’t have time to do justice to right now, but in short, they don’t think like we do, and they are not as attached to their bodies as we are. They know that death is anything but the end. All other animals have that grace that we forgot.

One of the great things about fantasy and science fiction is the opportunity to at least imagine how life might be under very different political economies, different ecosystems, different biologies, and different ways of being. I have read plenty of the close encounters that accomplished psychonauts have had with whales and dolphins, and I hung out with a dolphin community for a couple of days. Dolphins and whales are telepathic. A dolphin pod may have twelve dolphins and twelve souls, but the souls bounce around between the bodies. There is lots of stuff like that in the mystical and dolphin communities. How much is real, I cannot say, but I think that plenty is. Dolphins seem to be into FE:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...ins#post511613

Any creature that shares the planet with “slaughter anything that moves” humans, and especially a sentient one, has taken on a difficult task, perhaps at the Creator’s behest.

There is evidence that whales have avoided humans:

http://www.ahealedplanet.net/simon.htm#spitsbergen

But if you think about it, there was really nowhere to run and hide, not in the long run. Whale food is only in a relative few places. Most of the world’s oceans are the equivalent of deserts. Humans just staked out the “water hole,” so to speak. But like the Indians that could not escape the predatory Europeans, the whale really had no escape.

Whales may not be smarter than us, but maybe they are. But the human standard of “intelligence,” is highly biased. I think that they think very differently than humans do. One of the snippets that I once read is that a whale can make a great white shark, for instance, a pet, via telepathic control, and like a faithful dog, the shark can be found within a few miles of its whale master. Maybe they play “fetch.”

Going to bed now.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Back to those apes. As I stated earlier, the Antarctic icecap has been growing for about forty million years:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...ica#post533612

which consequently lowered the ocean levels. Carbon dioxide had far higher atmospheric concentrations in the distant past, such as twenty times today’s levels:

http://earthguide.ucsd.edu/virtualmu...ge2/07_1.shtml

but for the past 200 million years, carbon dioxide levels have been falling, and this has been gradually cooling Earth’s surface. The global tropical conditions of the early Paleogene:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paleogene

continually cooled. There have been no major extinction events since the dinosaurs’ demise in the bolide extinction events (other than the recent and ongoing human-induced mass extinctions), but about 34 million years ago, there was a significant extinction event that mainly affected sea life:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eocene%...tinction_event

and it marked the beginning of pronounced cooling of Earth. Around 14 million years ago there was another extinction event:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Middle_Miocene_disruption

and the last of the relatively warm times is called the Pliocene, which ended about 2.5 million years ago:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pliocene

During those times, the mammals began to become more familiar to today’s humans, with ducks, horses, crows, and deer all recognizable:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miocene#Fauna

There is plenty of controversy about what brought on our ice age, but a leading contender is when the Isthmus of Panama formed three million years ago. That event not only led to the Great American Interchange that wiped out a great deal of South American fauna:

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post533612

but closing the Isthmus of Panama and the gradual land-locking of the ocean surrounding the North Pole are leading candidates for bringing on the ice age that we are in the middle of today:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quatern...ocean_currents

The beginning of this ice age is called the Quaternary Period:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quaternary

and ice sheets have been advancing and retreating over the Northern Hemisphere ever since. Because an ice sheet wipes out everything in its way, piecing together the episodes has been a challenge, but it is now generally accepted that ice sheets have been advancing and retreating at fairly precise 100K-year intervals during the past million years:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_glaciation

which corresponds to a cycle of changes in the eccentricity of Earth’s orbit:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milanko...0-year_problem

The past 2.5 million years of advancing and retreating ice sheets is called the Pleistocene:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pleistocene

and this past interglacial interval has been rather arbitrarily called the Holocene:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holocene

because it is the time of humanity’s day in the sun. All of human history resides in the Holocene, all of civilization, all of what makes us so great. We may be artificially extending the Holocene with our venting of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases to the atmosphere, but I get ahead of myself.

Grasses are relatively recent arrivals on the evolutionary scene, perhaps appearing during the age of dinosaurs:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poaceae#Evolution

The lowering carbon dioxide levels led to C4 plants making their appearance

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evoluti...tionary_record

around thirty million years ago, some grasses “invented” a more efficient way to take carbon from the air. Those C4 grasses can live in hotter, dryer, and relatively carbon- and nitrogen-starved environments than C3 plants:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C4_carb...the_C4_pathway

C4 plants did not become significant until about 6-7 million years ago. When it gets dry, forests cannot maintain themselves, and grass takes over, especially those C4 grasses. As the current ice age began, it was not just the grinding havoc wreaked by ice sheets that shaped Earth’s ecosystems, but when Earth cooled during the advancing ice sheets, the sea levels fell and Earth also became dryer. In the tropics, the rain forests retreated and savannas appeared. Deserts also formed, expanding and contracting in apposition with the expanding and contracting rain forests. When the forests contracted, grazing animals expanded their ranges, and the savanna ecosystem is very different than a rainforest or desert ecosystem. And now we come to what Ilie has been waiting for, the appearance of apes that walked upright.

Because those apes began to look recognizably human, this area of research has long had a disproportionate share of resources devoted to it, and more effort has gone into finding humanoid fossils than any other area of fossil hunting. People have spent their lives walking around in Africa, especially Olduvai Gorge:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Olduvai_Gorge

looking for fossils of protohumans. What used to be called the missing link is more on the scale of missing linklets as more fossils have been discovered.

As of today, the earliest candidate for the branching of the human line from the chimpanzee line is about seven million years old:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sahelanthropus_tchadensis

It may be what is called the last common ancestor of chimpanzee and humans, but the issue is by no means settled. The earliest specimen that is definitely down the human line is more than 4 million year old:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ardi

Its big toe seems to have been opposable, so it probably had not entirely left the trees yet.

About a million years later, the celebrity Lucy walked the Earth:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lucy_(Australopithecus)

She is the earliest example currently known of a protohuman that normally walked upright. In the evolution of humans, there are many changes in anatomy that signify a change in habitat and behavior, and one is the arms. As protohumans gradually left the trees, their arms became less suited to hanging from branches. Ardi would have had a more difficult time navigating in trees than a chimpanzee would have:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ardi#Anatomy

about a million years after Lucy, the first member of the genus homo appeared:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo

evidence of stone tools used by our ancestors currently goes back 2.6 million years.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oldowan_Industry

The theory goes all the way back to Darwin, and it states that when humans left the trees, their hands were freed up for tool-making, and the positive feedback grew the brains of our ancestors. The old saw of correlation is not causation is invoked here, but the greatest evolutionary change ever measured has been the rapid increase in the brain of the homo genus in the past few million years. I lean toward thinking that the positive-feedback effect has merit. About a half million years after Homo habilis appeared on the scene, big daddy Homo erectus appeared:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_erectus

There is spirited debate whether Homo erectus is a direct ancestor of humans, but it seems likely. What is not debated is that Homo erectus first appeared in Africa, but then migrated out of Africa to Eurasia.

As with other evolutionary radiations, there appears to be quite a few branches of protohumans, with lines going extinct. Until more fossils are found to fill the gaps, there will likely be debate on how the branches really lie, but for now, the general theory is that it looks something like this over the past two million years:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hu...utionchart.jpg

with quite a few species identified so far:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homo_(genus)#Species

the full arsenal of the tools available to White Science has been devoted to the question of human evolution, and we are nowhere near the end of that field of study:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_evolution

It is off to work now, but I will get to Homo erectus (or ergaster) and the changes that moved them out of Africa. They were likely the first hunter-gatherers, and the first that we would call recognizably human in how they lived.

Best,

Wade

[WhiteFeather]

Hey Wade you posted this back to me as a response prior......

" Hydrocarbons are only going to get more expensive, as we start running out of them".

What i was referring to was that HHO cells produce their own hydrogen gas by combining Low Voltage 12 Volts, Water and Baking soda. So im not understanding your response. Please elaborate more so kindly. *This video below shows how hydrogen gas is produced free. The electrical current is 12 volts which is alocated from the windshield wiper circuit of a car. The electric current 12 volts combined with water and baking soda produce free hydrogen gas when engine is running only.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5kdaUyJQ1IQ

[sandy]

Hi WhiteFeather,

I'm so pleased you are involved in this thread too as I do respect your posts and points of view.

One thing though that I have noticed is that Wade prefers to stay on target with his mission to build a Free Energy Choir and not be distracted by discussions of other alternative energy devices. Although we all know he is the expert here in the Avalon Community, Ilie and Paul have created Threads to discuss these types of invention to assist Wade and his focus.

He is a very busy man with a full time job, family and his life's mission regarding bringing Free Energy to our world. His writings are well researched and very comprehensive and a valuable education for all who read as I'm sure you are aware. I can't fault him for having little time or interest to discuss other alternative devices, seeing his history is full of this information, promising inventions and destroyed dreams over and over again. In most cases he has been there and done that and probably has T shirts too

In supporting Wade's mission here at Avalon, I hope you are not offended by my post but wanted to keep it public so that all who wish to engage Wade in other alternative energy discussions can understand that this thread is not for that purpose.

In saying that I also love your participation here as I know your heart is one of the biggest I have ever seen in many places in the Alternative Community and your wisdom and love is very appreciated and valued by me. You help me to keep envisioning a world of Abundance with your kindness and positive energy

[CdnSirian]

WhiteFeather. I too greatly appreciate your posts and the way you acknowledge others on the forum.

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post530295 This may be the right place, also a thread by Wade to do with FE inventions....

[WhiteFeather]

Posted by sandy (here)
Hi WhiteFeather,

I'm so pleased you are involved in this thread too as I do respect your posts and points of view.

One thing though that I have noticed is that Wade prefers to stay on target with his mission to build a Free Energy Choir and not be distracted by discussions of other alternative energy devices. Although we all know he is the expert here in the Avalon Community, Ilie and Paul have created Threads to discuss these types of invention to assist Wade and his focus.

He is a very busy man with a full time job, family and his life's mission regarding bringing Free Energy to our world. His writings are well researched and very comprehensive and a valuable education for all who read as I'm sure you are aware. I can't fault him for having little time or interest to discuss other alternative devices, seeing his history is full of this information, promising inventions and destroyed dreams over and over again. In most cases he has been there and done that and probably has T shirts too

In supporting Wade's mission here at Avalon, I hope you are not offended by my post but wanted to keep it public so that all who wish to engage Wade in other alternative energy discussions can understand that this thread is not for that purpose.

In saying that I also love your participation here as I know your heart is one of the biggest I have ever seen in many places in the Alternative Community and your wisdom and love is very appreciated and valued by me. You help me to keep envisioning a world of Abundance with your kindness and positive energy

My gratitude to you Sandy for that warm and kind response. : )
I was originally going to post this info on the Free Energy Inventors thread but after reading post #11, link inserted below, Wade had stated he would answer them on this thread. Thats the impression I got from his response there, I could be wrong. Let me know please. Wanishi


https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l=1#post372108