Strongest Hurricane Ever recorded! (Patricia, 23 Oct 2015, Mexico)

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by RunningDeer (here)
Thank you. Thank you, you silly ones. You kicked-up my resolve another notch. I thought I was at optimal level. And I see. I see much broader than I could’ve fathomed just minutes ago.

So ... is all this evidence of the success of the Avalonian weather modification team, or the dastardly deceptions of the bastards in power ?

I don't know how to find the answer to that question ...

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by RunningDeer (here)
Thank you. Thank you, you silly ones. You kicked-up my resolve another notch. I thought I was at optimal level. And I see. I see much broader than I could’ve fathomed just minutes ago.

So ... is all this evidence of the success of the Avalonian weather modification team, or the dastardly deceptions of the bastards in power ?

I don't know how to find the answer to that question ...

Both, cuz that's what we, the Avalonian weather modification team, do. You see, we're a multi-level team.

Silly bastards are getting stupider and we're shinning brighter. It really is all pretend. They're being to believe it's real and we're waking up to the fact that it's not.



PS quick answer... running out the door to family gathering...

[jake gittes]

I should have clarified in my last post that I was commenting on the photos in the two Facebook links.

I have done google image searches for Patricia and other storms and there are hardly any damage photos from Patricia. Real storms show real damage. Patricia does not. Had there been any, it would be plastered all over the media to show how horrible we all are for thoughtlessly exhaling carbon dioxide so many times a day!

[idiit]

I have done google image searches for Patricia and other storms and there are hardly any damage photos from Patricia. Real storms show real damage. Patricia does not.

exactly. interesting to follow this one.

[ulli]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by RunningDeer (here)
Thank you. Thank you, you silly ones. You kicked-up my resolve another notch. I thought I was at optimal level. And I see. I see much broader than I could’ve fathomed just minutes ago.

So ... is all this evidence of the success of the Avalonian weather modification team, or the dastardly deceptions of the bastards in power ?

I don't know how to find the answer to that question ...

My take is this: there was a Cat 1, or maybe 2.
The media exaggerated and hyped it to a Cat 5.
For whatever reason; maybe the usual data mining they have become so good at.
Being a tad gullible the AWMT still decided to give it their attention.
(AWMT= Avalon Weather Modification Team)

[araucaria]

The first part of this post offers some thoughts on advances in weather forecasting: they should only be possible if weather patterns are becoming more, not less, normal. In other words, freak events should not be predictable at all. There is scientific evidence to suggest that such phenomena as earthquakes, forest fires, or stock exchange collapses never “know” in advance how big they are going to be (see Mark Buchanan, Ubiquity, The Science of History… or Why the World is Simpler Than We Think). It may be that greater effort on one side (weather control) is simply cancelled out by greater effort on the other side (the AWMT), and the result is weather within normal limits in the normal way. Maybe no one has quite as much power as they think.

Whatever lessons historians may be able to draw from all this, the meaning for the individual is more ambiguous. For if the world is organized into a critical state, or something much like it, then even the smallest forces can have tremendous effects. In our social and cultural networks, there can be no isolated act, for our world is designed – not by us, but by forces of nature – so that even the tiniest of acts will be amplified and registered by the larger world. The individual, then, has power, and yet the nature of that power reflects a kind of irreducible existential predicament. If every individual act may ultimately have great consequences, those consequences are almost entirely unforeseeable. Out there right now on some red square in the field of history a grain may be about to fall. Someone trying to bring warring parties to terms may succeed, or may instead spark a conflagration. Someone trying to stir up conflict may usher in a lengthy term of peace. In our world, beginnings bear little relationship to endings, and Albert Camus was right: “All great thoughts have ridiculous beginnings”.

[Operator]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by RunningDeer (here)
Thank you. Thank you, you silly ones. You kicked-up my resolve another notch. I thought I was at optimal level. And I see. I see much broader than I could’ve fathomed just minutes ago.

So ... is all this evidence of the success of the Avalonian weather modification team, or the dastardly deceptions of the bastards in power ?

I don't know how to find the answer to that question ...

Double whammy, both are true Paul ... Their spells and magic simply stopped working because it requires an audience believing it ...

[jake gittes]

Posted by ulli (here)

My take is this: there was a Cat 1, or maybe 2.
The media exaggerated and hyped it to a Cat 5.
For whatever reason; maybe the usual data mining they have become so good at.
Being a tad gullible the AWMT still decided to give it their attention.
(AWMT= Avalon Weather Modification Team)

The problem -- the very big problem -- is that it was said to be a CAT 5 and backed up with satellite imagery by the National Weather Service and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, two entities which are supposed to report accurately about such systems. It's their job! The media will always hype it, but if it's reported to be a CAT 5 by the NWS and NOAA, who provide the satellite imagery supporting a CAT 5 system, then it needs to be hyped for those in harm's way.

There's also the very troubling aspect of their issuing of gag orders two days prior. This strongly suggests a case of deliberately misleading the public that something far more severe was occurring. This is looking like it was the Sandy Hook of storms.

[Patrikas]

I thought i would add these links also from Jimstones website to show how this has been happening for some time & to perhaps add a few more dots to the picture i think its relevent to this thread i hope the Op and the mods think so too ...
Remember cyclone Sandy that came ashore near New York almost 3 years ago to the day .....

Full report from Jimstone here
http://jimstonefreelance.com/sandyhaarp.html

And this report originally from early 2012 but extensively updated in 2014 regarding his views about HAARP and also a good technical explanation of how it works with regards to weather modification and also facts about how NASA knew there were "electrical" anomalies with the big cyclones of 2005 EMILY RITA AND KATRINA

full report from Jimstone here;
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/haarp.html

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Operator (here)
Double whammy, both are true Paul ... Their spells and magic simply stopped working because it requires an audience believing it ...

But we did believe it, until the day after, when the reports of modest damage and no deaths told us otherwise.

Posted by jake gittes (here)
The problem -- the very big problem -- is that it was said to be a CAT 5 and backed up with satellite imagery by the National Weather Service and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, two entities which are supposed to report accurately about such systems. It's their job! The media will always hype it, but if it's reported to be a CAT 5 by the NWS and NOAA, who provide the satellite imagery supporting a CAT 5 system, then it needs to be hyped for those in harm's way.

There's also the very troubling aspect of their issuing of gag orders two days prior. This strongly suggests a case of deliberately misleading the public that something far more severe was occurring. This is looking like it was the Sandy Hook of storms.

Yeah .

At present, the evidence tells us that they spent a couple of days having NWS and NOAA falsely hype this storm, with wildly false images and data, and with an internal gag order to prevent anyone leaking this lie.

Then, unlike Sandy Hook, where the official story (and hence most of the sleeping majority) still support the mass shooting story years later, instead, in the case of Patricia, what I suppose is the reality of minimal damage, no deaths, and modest winds a day later, was allowed in the "news".

This is weird ... two days of totally fabricated hype ... then back to some approximation of what is I presume a far more mundane reality.

... and it will still work for the bastards ... years from now, if you ask someone to list major hurricanes, one percent will recall Patricia as a Cat V that hit Mexico, another ten percent will be able to find that answer after searching Google and Wikipedia, and the remaining eighty-nine percent will, as usual, not have a coherent answer. If one of us tin-foil-hat, conspiracy theory nutcases protests that "NOAA lied; no-one died; Patricia was no Cat V", our friends, family, neighbors and co-workers will shake their heads "There he/she goes again ... sad".

To the bastards in power:

[ThePythonicCow]

So ... what, likely several, motivations might the bastards in power have had for yet another false event:

• Probing our reactions and awareness, both in bulk and individually, as part of a "continuous learning" process for their psyops, AI, propaganda, mass population control.
• A test specifically of certain NOAA, Weather Service and associated employees, to know who they can count on.
• A feint to the jaw of the Mexican leaders: "This is what we can do ... and you know it ... stay in line" (better in some ways than actually killing tens of thousands, as that energizes opposition.)
• Our daily dose of fear porn theater.
• A distraction from something else, elsewhere on or near the planet.
• Temporarily vacate that portion of the Mexican coastline to conceal some other operation.

[jake gittes]

Good stuff, Paul. Excellent theories, too.

[Octavusprime]

This video shows the storm from the International Space Station. No way to verify if it is truly from a few days ago but figured I'd place it here for those to ponder.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Gnc89GFg61k

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by RunningDeer (here)
Thank you. Thank you, you silly ones. You kicked-up my resolve another notch. I thought I was at optimal level. And I see. I see much broader than I could’ve fathomed just minutes ago.

So ... is all this evidence of the success of the Avalonian weather modification team, or the dastardly deceptions of the bastards in power ?

I don't know how to find the answer to that question ...

Warning lots of mixed metaphors.
I blame it on the wine and two pieces of pumpkin-spice cake. Burp.

My first impression about the hurricane was ‘low level urgency’. Pressed for time this morning, I skimmed the posts and the above AWMT(Avalonian weather modification team) photo came to mind. In hindsight, it can also be seen as ‘there is no storm’. My ah-ha was confirmation AGAIN there is ‘no spoon’. Busted. I withdraw my consent to shine light on their shenanigans. They point over there and it makes me DO even more over here.

To stay current, I skim the threads. But my ‘vision’ keeps circling back: 1) help with the frequency glitches to our spirit-vehicles 2) join with humanity to transmute and rediscover our brilliance.

Those silly ones are like the kid pulling a tantrum. We’re no longer attached to the silliness. It’s gotten so old that we don’t even hear it and keep on walking. Meanwhile, the kid catches up, grabs our hand and we keep on walking. What’s for dinner? French fries, clam cakes and pizza with extra cheese.

So ... is all this evidence of the success of the Avalonian weather modification team, or the dastardly deceptions of the bastards in power ?

I don't know how to find the answer to that question ...

My guess it’s not an answer to your question. Here’s one. Some experience a hurricane and some don’t. Where I live it’s hurricane proof. That’s a scary statement to put out there but it’s what I live most minutes. It's not fool proof but it sharpens my courage and resolve. If for nothing else, I'm one of those that's got ya back. [insert red face smilie]

Or do we even need to find the answer to the question? It’s kinda like they’re leading us by a leash, round and round in circles. F-the question. If you had the answer would you believe it 100%? It’s a rigged game. I stepped off.

In the first video, trick question: Guess which one I’m not? Answer: Both

Dog chasing Traxxas Stampede

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=4GQC6YcxGaY

If You Build It, He Will Come - Field of Dreams

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5Ay5GqJwHF8

Paula ♡

[Inmortal719]

Here's some real footage of Hurricane Patricia when it hit ground..

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=npPjs-wvbYM

https://www.facebook.com/adcolima/vi...6444143749608/
https://www.facebook.com/mtmonroy1/v...3336929879023/

I mean it does looks strong however, I haven't seen any mexican media reporting massive damage anywhere....

[Darla Ken Pearce]

Thought this was worth considering:


Final answer at the end of the day: There WAS NO HURRICANE

UPDATE from Jim Stone: https://jhaines6a.wordpress.com/2015...-warming-hoax/

This was a lie from start to finish. It made landfall nowhere. It dissipated into a tropical depression 100 miles out at sea after barely becoming a tropical storm. This fake cane was just a load of bunk to support the climate scam. Only a little rain in Guadalajara, only a little rain in Guanajuato, only rain even in Puerto Vallarta, which the eye passed over. Many witnesses are wondering WTF happened to this storm, which never existed. It is OFF THE TV. It is NOT ON DRUDGE, and out of the news TOTALLY. It is not even in news flashes.

OFFICIAL TALLY: Zero deaths, zero property damage. The entire coast is populated from start to finish. There is no way for any real hurricane to have a tally of ZERO.

Even if, as the prevailing damage control lie goes: “the hurricane was extremely compact and had only category 1 winds 15 miles away from the eye wall,” we have the leading edge, at 30 miles wide, full cat 5, and the sides for another 30, for a cat 5 to category 1 total distance 60 miles. WHERE IS THE DEVASTATION? There is not one downed house, not one washed out road, not one flipped over car when cars should have been missiles and the ENTIRE coast is populated. Who is pushing this crap about a record hurricane?

ANSWER: Climate scammers who want a “world record hurricane” on the books for the climate change/carbon tax agenda, that is who. This is not even in the Mexican news flashes anymore, it just evaporated like a ghost into nowhere. But it is now on the books as the big BAAAAD climate change cane, just wait and see! You will see the geriatric climate change lie get up and dance with this “cane!”...

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Paul (here)
So ... what, likely several, motivations might the bastards in power have had for yet another false event:

• Probing our reactions and awareness, both in bulk and individually, as part of a "continuous learning" process for their psyops, AI, propaganda, mass population control.
• A test specifically of certain NOAA, Weather Service and associated employees, to know who they can count on.
• A feint to the jaw of the Mexican leaders: "This is what we can do ... and you know it ... stay in line" (better in some ways than actually killing tens of thousands, as that energizes opposition.)
• Our daily dose of fear porn theater.
• A distraction from something else, elsewhere on or near the planet.
• Temporarily vacate that portion of the Mexican coastline to conceal some other operation.

I left off perhaps the most likely - as suggested by Jim Stone (see my own Post #54, above):

• This was a fake hurricane that will hit the books as real, to provide fodder for the climate change scam.

[RunningDeer]

Posted by RunningDeer (here)

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by RunningDeer (here)
Thank you. Thank you, you silly ones. You kicked-up my resolve another notch. I thought I was at optimal level. And I see. I see much broader than I could’ve fathomed just minutes ago.

So ... is all this evidence of the success of the Avalonian weather modification team, or the dastardly deceptions of the bastards in power ?

I don't know how to find the answer to that question ...

Or do we even need to find the answer to the question? It’s kinda like they’re leading us by a leash, round and round in circles. F-the question. If you had the answer would you believe it 100%? It’s a rigged game. I stepped off.

In the first video, trick question: Guess which one I’m not? Answer: Both

Dog chasing Traxxas Stampede

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=4GQC6YcxGaY

If You Build It, He Will Come - Field of Dreams

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5Ay5GqJwHF8

Paula ♡

UPDATE:

Trick question: Guess which one I’m not?

Answer: both - the bitten and the bitter
Answer: three - the bitten, the bitter, the remote controller
Answer: four - the bitten, the bitter, remote controller, the sucked in audience
Answer: five - the bitten, the bitter, remote controller, the sucked in audience, the creator of the game
Answer: six - the bitten, the bitter, remote controller, the sucked in audience, the creator of the game, a co-creator's buddy who laid down to win it all, odds of 50-1
Answer: seven - I’m all of them [Source]

Remember? I said it was a trick question.
And…I get change the rules any damn time I want.

Dog chasing Traxxas Stampede

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=4GQC6YcxGaY

[idiit]

So ... what, likely several, motivations might the bastards in power have had for yet another false event

climate change fear porn and a distraction; Benghazi hearing? something else happened while the magicians attracted our attention elsewhere.

imo the other possibility mexico getting ready to do something that tptb disapproves of.

jim willie lives in costa rica. he often talks of how the panama government was getting ready to do something ( I forget what) and the usa used space based lasers and melted a bunch of ppl in broad daylight. this is jim willies only woo woo tale. he's been posting prolifically for over 10 years. he has a phd from the #2 university in his field; quantitative analysis. most of us know about the japan tsunami being manmade theories.

(1) THE PANAMA DECEPTION (NEVER FORGET HISTORY)

The Panama Deception is a 1992 documentary film that won the Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature. The film is critical of the actions of the US military during the 1989 invasion of Panama by the United States, covering the conflicting reasons for the invasion and the depicting of the US media as biased. It was directed by Barbara Trent of the Empowerment Project and was narrated by actress Elizabeth Montgomery.



The film asserts that the U.S. government invaded Panama primarily to renegotiate the Torrijos--Carter Treaties. Another allegation made by the film is that the United States tested some form of laser or energy weapon during the invasion. The film also includes footage of mass graves uncovered after the US troops had withdrawn, carpet-bombed civilian neighborhoods, as well as the depiction of some of the 20,000 refugees who fled the invasion.



http://youtu.be/-zMmITXwSts

http://m.delphiforums.com/da_vinci/messages/2311/1

[jake gittes]

Yeah, Noriega was one of their early, "Oh-my-god-this-is-the-worstest-most-evilish-person-in-the-whole-world-guy-type" guys whose pursuit was the official reason given to invade some country. It's usually someone most had never heard of -- Gaddafi, Hussein, Bin Laden, etc, etc, etc. -- but are suddenly hyped as the "Oh-my-god-this-is-the-worstest-most-evilish-person-in-the-whole-world-guy!"

We now join this manhunt, already in progress..