+ Reply to Thread
Page 15 of 20 FirstFirst 1 5 15 20 LastLast
Results 281 to 300 of 382

Thread: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

  1. Link to Post #281
    UK Avalon Member Clear Light's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th September 2015
    Age
    55
    Posts
    1,007
    Thanks
    1,816
    Thanked 5,312 times in 951 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by observer (here)
    Perhaps you like dwelling in this Living Hell. I speak to those who have grown weary of the Free-Will-Game....
    With respect : WHO is the One claiming to be "Living in Hell" ?

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Clear Light For This Post:

    betoobig (28th October 2015), greybeard (27th October 2015), observer (27th October 2015)

  3. Link to Post #282
    Scotland Avalon Member greybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Inverness-----Scotland
    Language
    English
    Age
    80
    Posts
    13,434
    Thanks
    32,737
    Thanked 69,423 times in 11,919 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Hi Observer
    I suspect that you & I and several others are on the same page as far as Cern --reincarnation etc are concerned, we perhaps just have different ways of looking at how to "get out of here". (Being here, a separate individual, in a body is the illusion)
    Im with Clear Blue Skies --no self no problem.
    Who is this enduring?

    This line of questioning comes from the late Ramana Maharshi enlightened sage.

    Depends on whether one wants to stay in duality, endure and reincarnate, or realise the Self.
    To my mind the more you try to right wrongs, fix things, the deeper you buy into duality.
    People have been trying to make wrong right since time began--has that worked?

    Every war has been fought over Im right, your wrong, I want some thing you have. I want to change things for the better, the end justifies the means-- basically rampant ego positions.

    Cern is evidence of this ego. Could say no ego no problem.

    I don't expect agreement with my take on this.

    Chris
    Be kind to all life, including your own, no matter what!!

  4. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to greybeard For This Post:

    betoobig (28th October 2015), Heart-2-Heart (28th October 2015), observer (28th October 2015), StandingWave (28th October 2015)

  5. Link to Post #283
    Avalon Member CD7's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th October 2011
    Location
    Port Saint Lucie, Fl
    Age
    57
    Posts
    1,562
    Thanks
    4,566
    Thanked 6,901 times in 1,410 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by Clear Blue Skies (here)
    Quote Posted by observer (here)
    Perhaps you like dwelling in this Living Hell. I speak to those who have grown weary of the Free-Will-Game....
    With respect : WHO is the One claiming to be "Living in Hell" ?



    HELLs resident right here!!! ....but we have found it is not evil its just run by retards...
    We X Billions want to change the world and it appears we are......
    PARADISE IS POSSIBLE EVERYWHERE 4 EVERYONE

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to CD7 For This Post:

    betoobig (28th October 2015), Clear Light (28th October 2015), naste.de.lumina (27th October 2015), observer (27th October 2015)

  7. Link to Post #284
    United States Avalon Member gripreaper's Avatar
    Join Date
    2nd January 2011
    Posts
    3,979
    Thanks
    9,625
    Thanked 29,694 times in 3,744 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote "A FORMER politician [Simon Parkes] has made the extraordinary claim that he stopped the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) opening a portal to another dimension that would have destroyed mankind"
    Wow, how exciting! Simon Parks stopped the evil psychopathic alien interlopers from releasing the Nephilim back into our earth dimension and destroying mankind! Thanks Simon!

    Quote From the mouth of an Intelligence Community Whistleblower, no alleged extra-terrestrials can be trusted. Mr. Swerdlow's background comes from the same Global Intelligence Community that has their finger-on-the-pulse of what is really happening behind all of the smoke-and-mirrors of This Particular Reality. Mr. Parks appears to be just another "Simon-Says" Extraterrestrial-Mind-Control-Program.
    Ah sh!t, I was just about to go back to drinking beer and watching football cause I thought the whole nefarious agenda was taken care of by Simon, and now we’re talking about just another mind control program?

    This reality we live in really is screwed up!
    Last edited by gripreaper; 28th October 2015 at 02:45.
    "Lay Down Your Truth and Check Your Weapons
    The Next Voice You Hear Will Be Your OWN"
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IhS69C1tr0w

  8. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to gripreaper For This Post:

    avid (29th October 2015), betoobig (28th October 2015), Calz (28th October 2015), Clear Light (28th October 2015), greybeard (28th October 2015), Heart-2-Heart (29th October 2015), observer (28th October 2015), ulli (28th October 2015)

  9. Link to Post #285
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    20th March 2010
    Location
    Within a few kilometers of Avalon
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,702
    Thanks
    3,990
    Thanked 7,178 times in 1,466 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by greybeard (here)
    [....snip]
    I don't expect agreement with my take on this.

    Chris
    How correct you are, Chris.

    Our debate goes way back to the days of ol' RedeZra and the early days of this current version of the Avalon Forum.

    The fundamental difference between how you perceive reality and the way I perceive it lies in a single fact. A fact which you never have seemed to accept. I can say that because you are forever quoting the Sages, and Wise Men in your comments and replys; to the point that I've come to ignore what you are saying. I'm certain that feeling is mutual, as well.

    The single, most significant difference in our ideologies is: "I believe EVERYTHING we've ever been told is a lie", and it appears to me, that you don't.

    It's just that simple....

    From my life-long investigation into how this reality really works; a deep investigation into what dwells behind the smoke-and-mirrors of reality; one might come to a conclusion where all prophecy, all the words of the sages, clairvoyants, seers, channelers, remote viewers, or whatever other nametag one might hang on the phenomenon - all of this is the result of advanced Artificial Telepathic Technology.

    Our reality has been manipulated since the Dawn of Man, by hyperdimensional entities who feed on humanities energies, and....

    "They are very clever at what they do".

  10. Link to Post #286
    France Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Posts
    5,403
    Thanks
    12,061
    Thanked 31,025 times in 5,009 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by observer (here)
    Quote Posted by greybeard (here)
    [....snip]
    I don't expect agreement with my take on this.

    Chris
    How correct you are, Chris.

    Our debate goes way back to the days of ol' RedeZra and the early days of this current version of the Avalon Forum.

    The fundamental difference between how you perceive reality and the way I perceive it lies in a single fact. A fact which you never have seemed to accept. I can say that because you are forever quoting the Sages, and Wise Men in your comments and replys; to the point that I've come to ignore what you are saying. I'm certain that feeling is mutual, as well.

    The single, most significant difference in our ideologies is: "I believe EVERYTHING we've ever been told is a lie", and it appears to me, that you don't.

    It's just that simple....

    From my life-long investigation into how this reality really works; a deep investigation into what dwells behind the smoke-and-mirrors of reality; one might come to a conclusion where all prophecy, all the words of the sages, clairvoyants, seers, channelers, remote viewers, or whatever other nametag one might hang on the phenomenon - all of this is the result of advanced Artificial Telepathic Technology.

    Our reality has been manipulated since the Dawn of Man, by hyperdimensional entities who feed on humanities energies, and....

    "They are very clever at what they do".
    Observer, your debate might go back all the way past the deluge, maybe it is time really to understand what Chris is saying. I am not taking sides in an argument here; simply Greybeard’s position encompasses yours, while the opposite is not the case.
    Since Chris may tire of answering for himself, it seems to me he is saying, why do you set such store by “everything we have been told” instead of listening to your inner voice? There is only me, in which case you have to internalize those hyperdimensional entities and say, “I am very clever at what I do”, namely deceiving myself. When you do this, you find you are in control, and you stop being manipulated – unless of course that is what you enjoy doing to yourself. “They” and “we” are not the terms of a lie, they are the lie. Since it is you who are very clever, you can undeceive yourself; and if you want to continue the game, then take it to a new level of knowingly deceiving yourself.

  11. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to araucaria For This Post:

    betoobig (28th October 2015), Calz (28th October 2015), greybeard (28th October 2015), observer (28th October 2015), StandingWave (28th October 2015), ulli (28th October 2015)

  12. Link to Post #287
    Costa Rica Avalon Member ulli's Avatar
    Join Date
    19th November 2010
    Posts
    13,863
    Thanks
    67,199
    Thanked 128,074 times in 13,546 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by araucaria (here)
    Quote Posted by observer (here)
    Quote Posted by greybeard (here)
    [....snip]
    I don't expect agreement with my take on this.

    Chris
    How correct you are, Chris.

    Our debate goes way back to the days of ol' RedeZra and the early days of this current version of the Avalon Forum.

    The fundamental difference between how you perceive reality and the way I perceive it lies in a single fact. A fact which you never have seemed to accept. I can say that because you are forever quoting the Sages, and Wise Men in your comments and replys; to the point that I've come to ignore what you are saying. I'm certain that feeling is mutual, as well.

    The single, most significant difference in our ideologies is: "I believe EVERYTHING we've ever been told is a lie", and it appears to me, that you don't.

    It's just that simple....

    From my life-long investigation into how this reality really works; a deep investigation into what dwells behind the smoke-and-mirrors of reality; one might come to a conclusion where all prophecy, all the words of the sages, clairvoyants, seers, channelers, remote viewers, or whatever other nametag one might hang on the phenomenon - all of this is the result of advanced Artificial Telepathic Technology.

    Our reality has been manipulated since the Dawn of Man, by hyperdimensional entities who feed on humanities energies, and....

    "They are very clever at what they do".
    Observer, your debate might go back all the way past the deluge, maybe it is time really to understand what Chris is saying. I am not taking sides in an argument here; simply Greybeard’s position encompasses yours, while the opposite is not the case.
    Since Chris may tire of answering for himself, it seems to me he is saying, why do you set such store by “everything we have been told” instead of listening to your inner voice? There is only me, in which case you have to internalize those hyperdimensional entities and say, “I am very clever at what I do”, namely deceiving myself. When you do this, you find you are in control, and you stop being manipulated – unless of course that is what you enjoy doing to yourself. “They” and “we” are not the terms of a lie, they are the lie. Since it is you who are very clever, you can undeceive yourself; and if you want to continue the game, then take it to a new level of knowingly deceiving yourself.
    Well said, araucaria. Integrating is a process. Each time a stranger becomes a friend there are less "thems" out there.

    And accepting that the universe has a few shoulders left to lean on, such as Greybeard's sages, is just as important as being alert to the fact that deception is an AI trap. The ultimate filter system is in one's own heart/head.

  13. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to ulli For This Post:

    araucaria (28th October 2015), betoobig (28th October 2015), Calz (28th October 2015), greybeard (28th October 2015), Heart-2-Heart (29th October 2015), observer (28th October 2015)

  14. Link to Post #288
    Scotland Avalon Member greybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Inverness-----Scotland
    Language
    English
    Age
    80
    Posts
    13,434
    Thanks
    32,737
    Thanked 69,423 times in 11,919 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by araucaria (here)
    Quote Posted by observer (here)
    Quote Posted by greybeard (here)
    [....snip]
    I don't expect agreement with my take on this.

    Chris
    How correct you are, Chris.

    Our debate goes way back to the days of ol' RedeZra and the early days of this current version of the Avalon Forum.

    The fundamental difference between how you perceive reality and the way I perceive it lies in a single fact. A fact which you never have seemed to accept. I can say that because you are forever quoting the Sages, and Wise Men in your comments and replys; to the point that I've come to ignore what you are saying. I'm certain that feeling is mutual, as well.

    The single, most significant difference in our ideologies is: "I believe EVERYTHING we've ever been told is a lie", and it appears to me, that you don't.

    It's just that simple....

    From my life-long investigation into how this reality really works; a deep investigation into what dwells behind the smoke-and-mirrors of reality; one might come to a conclusion where all prophecy, all the words of the sages, clairvoyants, seers, channelers, remote viewers, or whatever other nametag one might hang on the phenomenon - all of this is the result of advanced Artificial Telepathic Technology.

    Our reality has been manipulated since the Dawn of Man, by hyperdimensional entities who feed on humanities energies, and....

    "They are very clever at what they do".
    Observer, your debate might go back all the way past the deluge, maybe it is time really to understand what Chris is saying. I am not taking sides in an argument here; simply Greybeard’s position encompasses yours, while the opposite is not the case.
    Since Chris may tire of answering for himself, it seems to me he is saying, why do you set such store by “everything we have been told” instead of listening to your inner voice? There is only me, in which case you have to internalize those hyperdimensional entities and say, “I am very clever at what I do”, namely deceiving myself. When you do this, you find you are in control, and you stop being manipulated – unless of course that is what you enjoy doing to yourself. “They” and “we” are not the terms of a lie, they are the lie. Since it is you who are very clever, you can undeceive yourself; and if you want to continue the game, then take it to a new level of knowingly deceiving yourself.
    Thank you araucaria
    Yes everything arises and subsides within the ocean of consciousness---nothing is denied.
    Everyone’s views are encompassed within but seen as a level of consciousness at play.
    You are the field in which everything arises and falls ---as consciousness---beyond even consciousness is awareness which has no movement but is the presence which see everything which arises and is eternal and unaffected---there before Universes existed and will be there after they subside.

    That's as best I can explain my understanding.

    Chris
    Be kind to all life, including your own, no matter what!!

  15. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to greybeard For This Post:

    araucaria (28th October 2015), betoobig (29th October 2015), Calz (28th October 2015), Heart-2-Heart (29th October 2015), observer (28th October 2015), StandingWave (28th October 2015)

  16. Link to Post #289
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    20th March 2010
    Location
    Within a few kilometers of Avalon
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,702
    Thanks
    3,990
    Thanked 7,178 times in 1,466 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Since the earliest available recorded histories of man; whenever an ideology has failed the control agenda; at every point in history, when the appearance of a "breaking-free" was apparent; a new ideology was introduced to recapture those souls wishing a release from this prison matrix.

    Prehistorically, when all else has failed, a total restart was initiated, causing a total restart of all timelines.

    Much like a new computer program, all sorts of hypnotic mantras have been installed into the Mass Consciousness of Humanity in order to maintain a level of control, to the benefit of a certain few of the Global Elite. This process has been historically, the work of hyperdimensional entities. I'm suggesting a reoccurring template of action, obvious from a thorough study of history, i.e., history always repeats itself.

    Those "inner voices" you are all clinging-to, are the mantra of control, reverberating within your heads. It all sounds so melodiously resonant; so easy to cling-to.

    Quote Posted by araucaria (here)

    [....snip]
    "....simply Greybeard’s position encompasses yours, while the opposite is not the case."
    Your analysis couldn't possibly be any further from the mission, araucaria.

    Where all those members who regurgitate the popular mantra of whatever trendy ideology is in the pop-culture - like a fundamentalist does with dogma - I see these hypnotic mantras as an Artificial Telepathic Suggestion, i.e., "one's inner voice" - a very clever deception, wouldn't you agree?

    On the other hand, and in direct inverse to the rhetoric of these popular ideologies, my agenda is one of exposing the deception.

    My message is intended for only a few among us. Most will reject what is said, as evidenced by this current response with my reply to Chris.
    Last edited by observer; 28th October 2015 at 12:45. Reason: clarity

  17. Link to Post #290
    France Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    24th January 2011
    Posts
    5,403
    Thanks
    12,061
    Thanked 31,025 times in 5,009 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by observer (here)
    Since the earliest available recorded histories of man; whenever an ideology has failed the control agenda; at every point in history, when the appearance of a "breaking-free" was apparent; a new ideology was introduced to recapture those souls wishing a release from this prison matrix.

    Prehistorically, when all else has failed, a total restart was initiated, causing a total restart of all timelines.

    Much like a new computer program, all sorts of hypnotic mantras have been installed into the Mass Consciousness of Humanity in order to maintain a level of control, to the benefit of a certain few of the Global Elite. This process has been historically, the work of hyperdimensional entities. I'm suggesting a reoccurring template of action, obvious from a thorough study of history, i.e., history always repeats itself.

    Those "inner voices" you are all clinging-to, are the mantra of control, reverberating within your heads. It all sounds so melodiously resonant; so easy to cling-to.

    Quote Posted by araucaria (here)

    [....snip]
    "....simply Greybeard’s position encompasses yours, while the opposite is not the case."
    Your analysis couldn't possibly be any further from the mission, araucaria.

    Where all those members who regurgitate the popular mantra of whatever trendy ideology is in the pop-culture - like a fundamentalist does with dogma - I see these hypnotic mantras as an Artificial Telepathic Suggestion, i.e., "one's inner voice" - a very clever deception, wouldn't you agree?

    On the other hand, and in direct inverse to the rhetoric of these popular ideologies, my agenda is one of exposing the deception.

    My message is intended for only a few among us. Most will reject what is said, as evidenced by this current response with my reply to Chris.
    And what mission would you be referring to, Observer? Intended for what happy “few”? Your agenda of “exposing the deception”? It is no more than a slogan if it involves lashing out at everyone else as being part of the deception. The Avalon mission has no agenda as such, beyond seeking greater cohesion and happiness among all people. By divisively addressing some unidentified minority, you are failing that agenda.

    And how can you talk to me about “the earliest available recorded histories of man” being in any way reliable enough to draw any valid conclusions from them? What happened all of a sudden to “EVERYTHING we've ever been told is a lie”. I might actually be inclined to accept some of that stuff, but you should be throwing it out, all of it. Now if we are talking about deception, then self-contradiction like that would surely be a part of that “agenda”.

    ‘"One's inner voice" - a very clever deception, wouldn't you agree?’ Er, no, I emphatically disagree. I prefer any day to listen to my own voice than to your mantras: “history always repeats itself”, “they are very clever at what they do” etc. How come these “hypnotic mantras” of yours are not subject to Artificial Telepathic Suggestion while other people’s are? I object in the strongest terms to your accusation of “regurgitating” anything. Everything I say on this forum is substantiated by thousands of detailed, interlocking posts conflating extensive original thoughts of my own and the work of many others. History does not always repeat itself in any exact form: repetitive history has no place for my original thoughts and conflations. You are ignoring mountains of material that does not fit in with your pet theory.

  18. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to araucaria For This Post:

    betoobig (29th October 2015), Clear Light (28th October 2015), greybeard (28th October 2015), Heart-2-Heart (29th October 2015), ulli (28th October 2015)

  19. Link to Post #291
    Scotland Avalon Member greybeard's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2010
    Location
    Inverness-----Scotland
    Language
    English
    Age
    80
    Posts
    13,434
    Thanks
    32,737
    Thanked 69,423 times in 11,919 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Along with inner voice--which I dont really have,(as in guiding) is a quiet mind which I do have most of the time.
    "Be still and know that I am (is) God."
    We are all the "I am"

    So all the sayings of Christ and The Buddha are deception and to be thrown out?
    Dont think so.

    Something happens in the stillness--in the quietude that has no logical explanation--there is a wordless knowing that can not really be described.
    The power within is beyond understanding and compared to that CERN is what!!!!

    Chris
    Be kind to all life, including your own, no matter what!!

  20. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to greybeard For This Post:

    araucaria (28th October 2015), betoobig (29th October 2015), Calz (29th October 2015), Heart-2-Heart (29th October 2015), heretogrow (29th October 2015), StandingWave (29th October 2015), ulli (28th October 2015)

  21. Link to Post #292
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    20th March 2010
    Location
    Within a few kilometers of Avalon
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,702
    Thanks
    3,990
    Thanked 7,178 times in 1,466 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    ad hominem, araucaria?

    In whose interpretation of what I'm saying was I,
    Quote Posted by araucaria (here)
    "....lashing out at everyone else as being part of the deception."
    Only an individual whose paradigm has been challenged would characterize the message I deliver as a, "lashing-out".

    Additionally, it is you who is misconstruing the terms being used. When an observation is made regarding the untruthfulness of "everything we have learned", and discovering that constant through a thorough review of the historic record, how is this a contradiction?

    There are several members who have managed to take this CERN thread and derail it into a debate that should belong in the Spiritually Forum.

    As the OP of this Thread, I invite those members wishing to debate this issue to take it to that the appropriate forum.
    Last edited by observer; 29th October 2015 at 13:31. Reason: clarity/spelling

  22. Link to Post #293
    Brazil Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    4th April 2013
    Age
    56
    Posts
    1,453
    Thanks
    11,308
    Thanked 7,529 times in 1,350 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    This video is very crazy my friends ....

    Quote This video is called "Turbulence" and was created for an October 9, 2015 CERN TedxTalk called "Breaking the Rules." Other than CERN's Symmetry trailer, this might be the most upfront display of occult symbolism associated with CERN that I have ever seen. The trailer is very creepy...

    The original video is posted to Vimeo (https://vimeo.com/142364749) and is also used on CERN's website. I do not own this work. I am reposting the work to point out the symbolism used in it. I credit the owner of the work in the actual video as well.
    EXTREMELY CREEPY CERN New Video Released: Shows Oculus/Rise of the Phoenix


    Someone also saw the black sun?

    Naste.
    Last edited by naste.de.lumina; 29th October 2015 at 00:54. Reason: add question

  23. Link to Post #294
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    21st March 2010
    Location
    the foothills of le Massif Central, France
    Age
    79
    Posts
    1,352
    Thanks
    7,476
    Thanked 4,829 times in 1,059 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote Posted by naste.de.lumina (here)
    This video is very crazy my friends ....

    Quote This video is called "Turbulence" and was created for an October 9, 2015 CERN TedxTalk called "Breaking the Rules." Other than CERN's Symmetry trailer, this might be the most upfront display of occult symbolism associated with CERN that I have ever seen. The trailer is very creepy...

    The original video is posted to Vimeo (https://vimeo.com/142364749) and is also used on CERN's website. I do not own this work. I am reposting the work to point out the symbolism used in it. I credit the owner of the work in the actual video as well.
    EXTREMELY CREEPY CERN New Video Released: Shows Oculus/Rise of the Phoenix


    Someone also saw the black sun?

    Naste.
    From the TEDxCERN site:


    Quote Where does gold come from?

    David Lunney | 2015

    Did you know that gold is extraterrestrial? Instead of arising from our planet’s rocky crust, it was actually cooked up in space and is present on Earth because of cataclysmic stellar explosions called supernovae.
    CERN Scientist David Lunney outlines the incredible journey of gold from space to Earth.



    ADD
    Quote David Lunney


    David Lunney is the Director of Research at France’s CNRS and Head of the nuclear physics group at the CSNSM, Université de Paris-Sud.
    After slinging protons through the McGill University cyclotron for his PhD, he now hangs around CERN’s radioactive beam facility ISOLDE, transmuting lead atoms into gold.
    Always ready to discuss physics topics – especially over a beer – David believes that nuclear physicists have much to offer society and are not nearly as dangerous as most people think.
    Last edited by heyokah; 29th October 2015 at 09:49. Reason: ADD Lunney quote

  24. Link to Post #295
    UK Avalon Member Nick Matkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2012
    Posts
    1,683
    Thanks
    1,616
    Thanked 5,812 times in 1,510 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    My threshold of 'creepy' must be quite high then cos I didn't find that video creepy...

  25. Link to Post #296
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    21st March 2010
    Location
    the foothills of le Massif Central, France
    Age
    79
    Posts
    1,352
    Thanks
    7,476
    Thanked 4,829 times in 1,059 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    From the CERNTRUTH site, which I've mentioned before and didn't get much attention at that time.....
    add
    Quote Posted by heyokah (here)
    see ........
    UPDATE. APRIL 2015. CERN PREPARES COLLISIONS AT DOUBLE POTENCY…

    I. Theoretical Risks


    [.....snip]

    In the fall of 2015 CERN will begin colliding groups of 70 million lead hadrons at 287 tev, unpacking millions of quarks in each collision. Those quarks will be first accelerated at light speed, acquiring relativistic mass, becoming heavier strange quarks, the substance of a strange quark-gluon soup called a ‘strangelet‘. The strange liquid has the potential to become stable and start an ‘ice-9′ big-bang reaction. If that happens that effectively transforms the Earth into a pulsar.

    While CERN adamantly denies to the public and the press that production of Strangelets is possible, it runs a program called CASTOR for Centaruro And STrangelets Object Research, whose researchers affirm in their inner reports to the company the ‘likely’ probability of creating them. This is in accordance to the most advanced literature on the subject, but of course, it must be hidden to the public and the naive press…

    This simple fact – that CERN is just a quark cannon that deconfines and gives heavier mass to quarks, transforming them into the next ‘horizon’ of heavy mass, strange quarks, which eat up planets might seem amazing to the reader, submitted to the ‘rhetoric’ of research and the blatant lies of this institution, a left-over the cold war, ‘refurbished’ with a newspeak of research. But this is the bottom line, simple truth about CERN. CERN says its experiments are similar to cosmic rays, and this is false.

    Cosmic rays are mere single protons and gamma rays and electrons, light particles, NOT heavy lead atoms, massed in bunches, crashed to create quarks. So WE NEVER saw a deconfined quark in a cosmic ray.
    .........

    https://cerntruth.wordpress.com/


    This documentary is worth watching.




    ****

    RHIC is distillating strange liquid

    https://cerntruth.wordpress.com/2014/08/21/rhic/
    Last edited by heyokah; 29th October 2015 at 13:14. Reason: add quote

  26. Link to Post #297
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    20th March 2010
    Location
    Within a few kilometers of Avalon
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,702
    Thanks
    3,990
    Thanked 7,178 times in 1,466 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    ^^^^

    Thank you heyokah, for that "strange matters" video.

    Any member who is commenting on this thread, and doesn't believe there is a real threat from a total Ice-9 meltdown into a black hole, really needs to view that "strange matters" video before making another comment, here within this thread.

    The video begs the question, "what has happened to all the strangelets already produced at Brookhaven, and at CERN"? Are they already collecting in a liquid mass at the center of the Earth? Is the Critical Mass reaction already in progress, needing only a little more mass to begin the unstoppable chain reaction predicted by so many nuclear physicists?

    Please, to the members, do some research and most of all do some critical thinking....

    In response to comment #295: anyone who doesn't find the entire CERN phenomenon "Creepy", is dwelling in a state of willful ignore-ance.
    Last edited by observer; 29th October 2015 at 13:30. Reason: clarity

  27. Link to Post #298
    UK Avalon Member Nick Matkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2012
    Posts
    1,683
    Thanks
    1,616
    Thanked 5,812 times in 1,510 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    Quote In response to comment #295: anyone who doesn't find the entire CERN phenomenon "Creepy", is dwelling in a state of willful ignore-ance.
    I was clearly referring to the video.

    Anyway, I thought extraterrestrials (the good ones) would prevent us from doing anything really stupid. If they can close down US and USSR nuclear-missile silos at will, they probably won't sit back if they think we could turn the solar system into a black hole - will they?

  28. The Following User Says Thank You to Nick Matkin For This Post:

    observer (29th October 2015)

  29. Link to Post #299
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    20th March 2010
    Location
    Within a few kilometers of Avalon
    Age
    78
    Posts
    1,702
    Thanks
    3,990
    Thanked 7,178 times in 1,466 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    ^^^^

    Thank you Nick,

    I though, perhaps, you hadn't reviewed all the comments in this thread prior to making that one regarding naste's comment #293. That's why I only referred to your comment by its number, and I addressed my reply to "anyone".

    With regard to those, "good extraterrestrials" coming to save Humanity, please review the videos provided in comment #279, of which I've conveniently provided the full text, below:

    Quote Posted by observer (here)
    Quote Posted by Clear Blue Skies (here)
    Bill's "Project Avalon" interview with Simon Parkes mentioned in a UK "tabloid" newspaper, the "Daily Express" : 24 October EXCLUSIVE: 'I stopped Large Hadron Collider destroying human race', claims ex-politican

    Oh I have no idea if the article made it into print as well as being on their website because I never read that particular newspaper.

    Quote : "A FORMER politician [Simon Parkes] has made the extraordinary claim that he stopped the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) opening a portal to another dimension that would have destroyed mankind"
    Thank you Clear Blue,

    I'm certain there will be many members who will reject what I'm about to expose. I'm also certain this information may offend many of the members, even members of the administration. My sole intention is 'Transparency'. Everything I'm discussing is a matter of Public Record.

    Quote Posted by observer (here)
    I invite those members with any doubt to the Simon Parks Material to listen to this Stewart Swerdlow Lecture. Pay particular attention to what Stewart begins to talk about around the 20 minute mark:



    From the testimony of an Intelligence Community Insider, I would be very wary of any Mantis Agenda.
    Stewart Swerdlow comes from an ancestral linage of Intelligence Community Operatives. Stewart explains his ancestry in the first few minutes of this second video, below. Begin paying particular attention at around the 12 minute mark, and listen through what Stewart has to say about the Extraterrestrials dwelling within the Kuiper Belt.



    From the mouth of an Intelligence Community Whistleblower, no alleged extra-terrestrials can be trusted. Mr. Swerdlow's background comes from the same Global Intelligence Community that has their finger-on-the-pulse of what is really happening behind all of the smoke-and-mirrors of This Particular Reality. Mr. Parks appears to be just another "Simon-Says" Extraterrestrial-Mind-Control-Program.
    In general, I welcome all comments in this thread. I'd prefer those comments to be on topic, and informed regarding the thesis of this thread. Debate within that context is appreciated.
    Last edited by observer; 29th October 2015 at 16:19. Reason: clarity

  30. Link to Post #300
    UK Avalon Member Nick Matkin's Avatar
    Join Date
    17th March 2012
    Posts
    1,683
    Thanks
    1,616
    Thanked 5,812 times in 1,510 posts

    Default Re: Should Humanity Be Con-CERN-ed?

    If anyone's frightened of CERN, you should be terrified of this:

    China's planning to build the world's largest particle collider, twice the size of the LHC

    Seems we're all doomed!

  31. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Nick Matkin For This Post:

    Atlas (4th November 2015), heyokah (31st October 2015), observer (30th October 2015)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 15 of 20 FirstFirst 1 5 15 20 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts