Charge radius of the Proton, Nassim Haramein

[Sunny-side-up]

Maybe not the newest news but, I haven't seen much mention of Mr Haramein for some time so:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bn35qoCjLYA

Sauce:
http://resonance.is/explore/quantum-...press-release/

[wnlight]

Sorry, but I cannot understand why a new "theory of everything" requires a movie trailer. Is this just a money making scheme?

[Ernie Nemeth]

I don't understand the concept of the trailer, in general. I don't like to be teased, just give me the details! Course, I don't like strip clubs for the same reason. When the movie or doc is ready, let me know. My interest is not peeked by teasers.

Having said that, what's up with this big new theory of his - not ready yet?

Imagine Einstein with a teaser for his famous equation: "E = ...",

"Stay tuned for the rest - coming soon."

Nissan's problem is he cannot be accepted by his peers, and so he is on a PR program to appeal to the masses. His theories make sense in a non-classical way and that irks other scientists.

His style seems to be working, mostly with lay people. Maybe he can persuade, through numbers, some prestigious institution to publish his work. Trouble is, such institutions require peer review and acceptance, which he doesn't have.

Same story, isn't it? The old guard protecting the established dogma, whether right or wrong, against newcomers with revolutionary ideas and concepts.

[greybeard]

Think the trailer was done quite some time ago.
I agree with Ernie.
He has some "qualified" scientists working with him as I understand.

Chris

[Fanna]

MOST of the stuff that's going to be in the film he's still trying to make look good is in this video:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=t2GI8EnZ4Cg

I really like his work as well. He also recently was part of the Global Unification Summit. So was Desmond Tutu. I mean I know a lot of people are calling him a disinformist for many reasons, but I find his explanations and expansions on modern physics to be a breath of fresh air TOWARDS a reality where spirituality and scientuality (not a real word) don't have to be antonyms.

[Sunny-side-up]

I think he the real thing but he has many Mainstream-old-guard-establishment barriers to calculate his way through.

If your not on the pay roll you have to work hard on your own production!

He has a minds view of reality that is the way forwards IMO
He is starting to prove and rewrite many "Known MS science cover ups"

I wish him safe passage through the mine-field he is digging up.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Sunny-side-up (here)
Maybe not the newest news but, I haven't seen much mention of Mr Haramein for some time so:

As you realize, that's a couple of years old.

What Nassim claimed, back then, is presented in a little more detail in my post of the time: New "connected universe" theory offers alternative explanation of gravity and the source of mass (Nassim Haramein) -- Post #7.

My dissent is presented in my post of the time: New "connected universe" theory offers alternative explanation of gravity and the source of mass (Nassim Haramein) -- Post #15, which concludes by stating:

========

Nothing in Haramein's paper predicts or anticipates anything in PSI's 2013 refinement that wasn't already published in their 2010 result! This is so even though PSI's 2013 result had been published for a month before Haramein first submitted his paper to SDI (and PSI's result was accepted for publication two months prior to that.)

Here is a table of the various estimates of the charge radius in femtometers (fm) of a proton relevant to the above scenario:

0.8768 fm -- generally accepted radius using electron hydrogen
0.8418 fm -- PSI 2010 radius using muon hydrogen
0.8408 fm -- PSI Jan 2013 radius, refining their 2010 result
0.8412 fm -- Haramein's Feb 2013 radius estimate from proton mass

The implication that Nassim Haramein's paper successfully made this important prediction is false and misleading.

========

Nothing I've seen since has changed my view of Nassim Haramein's work.

[ThePythonicCow]

Here's an interview of Nassim Haramein from earlier this year, April 2015:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=y8GpAyD93ZA

It's a bit sad ... he's starting to slur his words ... perhaps a bit too much whacky weed ?

In the last couple of years, Jamie Janove has taken up the job of emissary / ambassador for Nassim Haramein's work. I can't find any further significant developments in this "work" in the last two years:

Jamie has been trained by Nassim personally to present his Unified Field Theory as one of his official “emissaries”, having presented the theory over 100 times in the past 3 years alone. He is also the creator and admin for both The Resonance Project & Nassim Haramein facebook pages, making original posts every day, 365 days a year.

In a word, my view: gibberish.

[Meggings]

Paul wrote: The implication that Nassim Haramein's paper successfully made this important prediction is false and misleading.
This appears to be what Nassim does in his enthusiasms.
I know of one leading-edge thinker Nassim got close to, who chose to distance himself from Nassim.
Perhaps his usefulness is presenting a "face" to the world for a conglomeration of findings?
I have a personal quiet aversion to anything with his moniker on it. Others may find merit in his "work".

[Sunny-side-up]

Thx for reply's all

One of the main things about Mr Haramein that i like and find refreshing is, he try to combine material/scientific and spiritual parts of human existence.

I still like many of his views about the universe, obviously I'm not highly versed in science but what he says resonates with me.

Good to read an up to date members view of him

[sunshaker]

I have not watched or heard much about Nassim Haramein, but I also have searched for "geometry" within the proton using fractals of the periodic table. I will have to have a read up on his ideas.

[wnlight]

Don't forget that the proton has an internal structure. The structure is composed of three quarks. However, do not consider this 'structure' to be a solid construction like a bridge or an office building.