The real footage of Apollo 11?

[6pounder]

i saw a video once that show's neil armstrong walking inside ruines of some infrastructure on the moon. i cant recall the name of the video. does any one have a clue about it or at leaqst where can i find this kind of video?

[Mutchie]

I have reviewed a whole lot of Moon footage but i have NEVER come across anything where Armstrong was seen beside anything relating to infrastructure because on Apollo 11 none of that type of thing was mentioned "to the public " I believe Apollo 20 was the ONLY mission that showed footage of Ruins & it looked like an ancient city of some type ... I really do wish for new evidence proving that the Moon is populated ... because i believe that it is.. William Rutledge released the footage im speaking about he claimed Apollo 20 DID happen but covertly.

ps - im not sure if it was ever debunked so dont shoot the messenger lol lol

[6pounder]

could you please share a link with me?

[Bill Ryan]

.
Might be this image... which is a composite fake.

[6pounder]

lol nothing like that bill. it was a footage of a crew (idk what espionage) walking inside ruins, pretty much like an under construction concrete infrastructure (only it was ruins)... pretty poor quality tho

[Bill Ryan]

.
Okay, how about this?

(found by searching "Neil Armstrong"+inside+ruins )

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=P0IxNkyT55k

[6pounder]

perfect thats the one!!!

¤=[Post Update]=¤

you think its fake?

[6pounder]

And thank you very much bill I think I should work on my Google/YouTube searching skills

[Cidersomerset]

I think Bill has given you the answer but it did remind me of the Apollo 20 ,
which is a hoax as far as I know ? But does represent what some researchers
say might be up there.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=mfQXssakBlw

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=pAPeydsL3wo

[6pounder]

By the look of that video there are so many things wrong with it it can't be real...

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Referring to the one I was looking for

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by 6pounder (here)
perfect thats the one!!!

¤=[Post Update]=¤

you think its fake?

From one of the YouTube comments:

It's a recreation, CGI animation made in Spain by the Dibulitoon Studio SL in 2001 as special effects for a movie by popular Spanish author J.J. Benitez. The movie was released by Televisión Española TVE telling the story of how the American astronauts found ruins of an ancient alien base on the Moon. The movie followed the model of the old British Alternative 3 movie and many people thought that the alien base ruins on the Moon were actually real and filmed by the Apollo crew.

[Foxie Loxie]

Didn't Bob Dean show a picture, supposedly taken on the moon that shows a glass like structure? It was taken inside, but showed no astronauts.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Foxie Loxie (here)

Didn't Bob Dean show a picture, supposedly taken on the moon that shows a glass like structure? It was taken inside, but showed no astronauts.

Hi there, Loxie!

Might you possibly be thinking of Richard Hoagland? In his Dec 2007 Camelot interview with Kerry and myself, he presented in some detail how he'd identified what he believed were giant glass structures on the moon, based on anomalous image artifacts that seemed to show refraction from glass, way up in the sky.

We didn't know that then (and neither did he), but what he'd REALLY found was evidence for the front screen projection technology used by Stanley Kubrick to create all the fabricated lunar landscape backdrops. The screens Kubrick used (as he did for his movie masterpiece, 2001) contained millions of tiny glass beads. It was a beautiful, accidental, confirmation.

[Atlas]

Anno 2205:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NL0uG7F6GuA

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Gl3ZGvmdlXs

[Atlas]

What's It's Like To Walk On The Moon:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=sy9R8WN2uMc

[sigma6]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
.
Might be this image... which is a composite fake.

ah... this is a perfect example of a Kubrick backlit screen... can you see where the "hidden line" would be? to demarcate the set from the (front screen projection) backdrop? Look for a "continuous line" (squiggly or otherwise) that separates the top section (backdrop) from the bottom section (set) and there should be a subtle but noticeable shift of colour and/or texture... ; ) Also the parallax effect (in moving videos) should be off, and also the focus distance aspect will not be consistent... i.e. some of his back drops look too perfect, with perfect detail of what should be more blurry and far away, etc ... can you see it?
...mind you I think this whole picture has multiple "layers"


and for what it's worth, here's another video I found that you were talking about (searching "astronauts walking amongst the ruins" on YouTube (their search engine is getting more "intelligent") I think this might be the same as Bill's... in Spanish... with 'scarier' sound effects...

A BUILDING ON THE MOON IN A VIDEO AND SOME PICS

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=9vv41yHto4U

Discrepancy Clarification....

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NL0uG7F6GuA

This was cute, but they over "literalized" the concept of the "dark side of the moon" It's considered "dark" because it is not viewable from earth hence "unknown" "hidden", etc... in the video though they show it as literally dark... but of course, in the video that was because of the angle of the sun which was behind the earth which has nothing to do with it being called the "dark side" ...LoL ...so although they did have it facing away from earth (check)... the "dark" side of the moon, although always facing away from earth, and therefore having never been seen by any earth telescope, I can assure you, depending it's relative location, gets plenty of sunlight...

Still an enjoyable video... I do love watching these types of futuristic animations...

See... even young computer programmers have difficulty with this concept... ; )