Boston marathon bombings (was: Explosions at Boston marathon)

[Julian]

It's wonderful to see the continuing spirit of investigation and persistence that is helping to unravel this latest installation of False Flag America. To all of you behind the scenes, keep up the good work. If they have switched Dzhokhar Tsarnaev perhaps someone will think to get DNA testing done to compare with his parents and sib. Let's hope this monstrous deception can be exposed.

[Slorri]

A good theory on actor doubles, some were there, then left, and others replaced them.

Actor's Doubles - It's all in the planning

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=x0Vzv4cG-ak

[Cidersomerset]

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Found Guilty of Boston Marathon Bombing

new Thursday 9th April 2015 at 09:37 By David Icke





‘After deliberating for 11 hours, a jury has found Dzhokhar Tsarnaev
guilty, on all 30 counts, of the Boston Marathon bombing.

Tsarnaev has been found guilty of conspiracy to use a weapon of mass
destruction, and the deaths of the Boston Marathon bombing victims,
as well as all other counts which could potentially carry the death penalty.

Overall, the jury ruled Tsarnaev guilty on each of the 30 counts that
the prosecution brought against him. The jury will now have to decide
whether or not Tsarnaev will face the death penalty. The sentencing
phase will begin on April 13.’

Read more: Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Found Guilty of Boston Marathon Bombing

http://sputniknews.com/us/20150406/1020534335.html

================================================




http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/


==================================================================================================== ====


The Truthseeker: Boston Bombing - What You Aren't Told

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=r32ZUn5rY9s

Published on 3 May 2013


Triggers pulled on 4th, 2nd & 1st Amendments distracted by flag waving; clunky FBI
propaganda; and unleash the War on Bathtubs. Seek truth from facts with former
Marine Corps officer James Fetzer, editor of Storyleak Anthony Gucciardi, the Corbett
Report's James Corbett, Questioning the War on Terror author Kevin Barrett, Boston
eyewitnesses, and Fmr. Rep. Ron Paul.

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...835#post669835

[awakeningmom]

Does anyone know of a good article that pulls together all the evidence showing that the Boston Marathon Bombing was a false flag (I tend to think it was a FF rather than a complete hoax)? I have a family member who balked when I suggested it yesterday but who eventually agreed to read the best evidence I had to support my opinion. I don't want to overwhelm her with long videos or a fifty page thread on PA, (where thoughts on what might have happened have evolved over the last two years), but if there's a really good article or a short video that might help someone who is skeptical open her mind, please let me know. I don't want to blow this opportunity by overwhelming her with stuff she will dismiss as nonsense.

[Slorri]

Posted by awakeningmom (here)
Does anyone know of a good article that pulls together all the evidence showing that the Boston Marathon Bombing was a false flag (I tend to think it was a FF rather than a complete hoax)? I have a family member who balked when I suggested it yesterday but who eventually agreed to read the best evidence I had to support my opinion. I don't want to overwhelm her with long videos or a fifty page thread on PA, (where thoughts on what might have happened have evolved over the last two years), but if there's a really good article or a short video that might help someone who is skeptical open her mind, please let me know. I don't want to blow this opportunity by overwhelming her with stuff she will dismiss as nonsense.

Maybe this could be useful:
http://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/201...kiI/story.html

[Cidersomerset]

David Shayler: "Dzhokhar Tsarnaev Had Nothing To Do With The Boston Marathon Bombing!"

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=BLwRR5Z3CO8

Published on 9 Apr 2015


Please Support The Show – http://richieallenshow.com/donate/

http://richieallenshow.com/
https://www.facebook.com/richieallenshow
https://youtube.com/RichieAllenSho...

[Cidersomerset]

Defense of Dzhokhar: The Real Smoking Gun in Boston

new Tuesday 21st April 2015 at 09:00 By David Icke



-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



EXCLUSIVE: In Defense of Dzhokhar: The Real Smoking Gun in Boston

April 21, 2015 By 21wire 0 Comments

Kurt Haskell
Patrick Henningsen
21st Century Wire
SPECIAL REPORT


‘We’re been told that Tamerlan Tsarnaev and his younger brother Dzhokhar, are
guilty of detonating two bombs at the Boston Marathon finish line on April 15, 2013.
After such a long trial, followed by lengthy sentencing and penalty phases, are we any
closer to knowing what really happened that day?

The penalty phase of the trial begins today. The stakes could not be higher. Already,
numerous Boston bombing victims and bystanders are speaking out in public opposing
any death penalty sentence for alleged bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

As we will demonstrate, there is a strong forensic case to be made for Dzhokhar ‘s innocence.’



IMAGE: Court room illustration of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

As 21WIRE outlined previously, there are a number key points and unique anomalies that
have been overlooked in this case. None however, are as compelling as this smoking gun:

Positioned near the finish line, we can reveal what could very well be the real suspect in
this bombing – a person dressed as a black haired woman, or ‘purse lady’. Her image can
be clearly seen in multiple photographs taken on the day of the incident, and based on the
evidence we’ll present, it’s very likely that this person was responsible for the second
Boston Bombing explosion.

In the exhibit below, we will show how this person clearly dropped a purse in front of the
fence, calmly walks away, just before a device was detonated at that very spot.

It seems that neither branch of the mass media, either the mainstream or the alternate
media have yet to touch this aspect of the Boston Bombing Trial. Speaking as a former
US attorney (Kurt Haskell), this would represent much of the defense case, and should
instill some reasonable doubt.

Setting the Stage

Below, we will take readers through a series of photographic exhibits, along with commentary
and analysis of the visual forensic aspects, as well as some contextual and speculative analysis.



Exhibit #1: The Bombs

According to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the prosecutors in this case,
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev is responsible for detonating a homemade kitchen ‘Pressure
Cooker’ bomb which was classified by the DOJ as a ‘weapon of mass destruction’.

Despite the ‘open and shut’ manner in which the prosecution and the media has
characterized this case, it’s still not completely clear just how many ‘explosions’
took place at the Boston Marathon that day, but the authorities maintain there were
two explosions. In retrospect, the larger of the two explosion does not add up in
relation to the rather minimal amount of damage seen after the fact. Also, one
could speculate that if you were a terrorist who wanted to create maximum damage
at a high profile event such as this, then one might expect that the terrorist
would construct the bomb to blow outward not upward, as we saw with the
incident’s now iconic, Hollywood-like plume explosion. Watch:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=-xiXroQp8t4

If the bomb was made to inflict massive damage, and considering the very high
concentration of bystanders packed into such a small space, then one would expect
that dozens, if not hundreds would have died at that instance.


If the bomb was made to inflict massive damage, and considering the very high
concentration of bystanders packed into such a small space, then one would expect
that dozens, if not hundreds would have died at that instance.

Exhibit #2: Dzhokhar’s Backpacks Don’t Match



Dzokar1
Photo Item 1.


Note that every picture of Dzokhar shown at this trial with a backpack at the Boston
Marathon has him carrying a white backpack (above).



Boston-Jogger
Photo Item 2.


This same image is also used as the prosecution’s ‘trial exhibit #29′ showing that
the backpack Dzokhar allegedly dropped off (note that there are no clear pictures
showing him dropping off the bag or any pictures of the bag present after Dzokhar
left. There also isn’t any real video of him dropping the bag off as the media
previously indicated). The backpack appears to be black, and therefore doesn’t
match the one he had previously. In actuality, we cannot tell if this black bag had
anything to do with Dzokhar at all.

Note the proximity of the bag (alleged bomb) to the tree in the middle of the
photograph. Note that the tree was unharmed but police cut it down afterward “as
evidence”.

Boston-Bomber-Woman-Finish-line
Photo Item 3.
IMAGE ABOVE: Same image as the above Photo Item 2 (zoomed out).

Exhibit #3: The Drop


Question: Was the bomb in backpack at all? According to the prosecution, ‘a black
bag was detonated’.

Is this even true? Let’s take a closer look at the scene of the incident…

Boston-Bombing-Finish-line-Real-bomber
Photo Item 4.


Approximately one hour prior to detonation. A tall woman with black hair,
sunglasses, black coat and white shirt appears to be alone (She is 2nd person to
left of do not enter sign).


Real-Bomber-Boston-Woman-purse-2
Photo Item 5.


The woman has now moved to front row (30-45 minutes before detonation) and is
dangling her purse in front of the fence.


Lu Lingzi (one of the deceased) is immediately over the woman’s left shoulder.
Ignore the arrow in Photo Item 5 (above).

[Cidersomerset]

Continued from above......


Woman-Finish-line-Boston-Bombing-3
Photo Item 6.



NOTE: If any 21WIRE reader can provide the video of this angle at the time of the explosion, please post below in the comment section.

In the top left image of these four connected pictures, the two women to the right
of the dark-haired ‘purse lady’ appear to have placed a light-colored garbage bag
near to them, still behind the fence. In the top right picture, someone, possibly one
of these two woman, has placed the garbage bag outside the fence. In the bottom
left picture, they have moved it to the front of the fence, after which time, the
purse lady has set her purse in, or on top of, this trash bag on the front side of the fence.

Note that these women did not arrive together. Do they even know each other?
What woman would set her purse over the fence, and on top of someone else’s
garbage bag? Is this not unusual?

Exhibit #3: The Richards’ Injuries

The facts of the Richards family and their injuries appear to be inconsistent with
the forensic details of the explosion, and are absolutely not at all consistent with
the ‘official blast zone’ explanation.

1-Boston-Finish-line-Real-bomber-woman-5

Photo Item 7.

In this picture above (Photo Item 7) we clearly see the young Martin Richard (head
circled in blue) who is said to have been basically ‘blown apart’ in the blast. To his
right and dressed in green, is his sister, Jane, whose sole injury was that her left
leg was blown-off. Note how she is sticking her left leg all the way through the
fence grade and in front of it. Their father stands between the two of them, slightly
to the back. Incredibly, he was uninjured in the blast.

Note also, the proximity of Dzokhar Tsarnaev to the father, and also the tree –
both of which were unharmed.

The most likely scenario for the Richards’ injuries is that a blast came from the
front, and to the right of them, not from the back right as per the ‘official theory’.

Note also, and below, how the bomb blast appears to blow the fence backwards,
and therefore, the injuries to the Richards family are consistent with a blast from
their front, and not right behind – where Tsarnaev is said to have allegedly dropped
his backpack which contained a bomb in it. Furthermore, the mysterious brown
purse was dropped right next to a mailbox that had close contact powder burns
only to its front corner, once again, consistent with a nearby blast from the front
side of the fence – where this purse was in fact dropped.

Exhibit #4: The Blast Zone – Fact and Fiction

We can see clearly from the photographic evidence here, that the government’s
official blast location has no burn marks, but there are substantial burn marks
adjacent to mailbox. Again, this fact is consistent with the detonation happening in
front of the fence, and not behind it where the accused Dzhokhar was standing
before the moment of the explosion.

Look very closely at this picture (below), which shows the scene immediately after
the blast. First of all, the fence to the left was blown backward. The small piece of
fence remaining near the mailbox was ripped apart exactly where the garbage bag/
purse was located. The bigger piece of fence is missing but is in the road and was
likely blown straight up/ and or possible ricocheted off of the tree and into the road.
Only the front left corner of the mailbox has close contact explosive burns and not
the back left corner which is what you would expect if the blast came from the tree
area( look very closely).


Boston-Explosion-Finish-line-1.1

Photo Item 8.

Also in the above picture (Photo Item 8), note that everything is blown backwards,
and to the left. Nothing to the right is damaged which is what you would expect if
the blast occurred next to the tree. This is because the blast occurred adjacent to
the mailbox, and clearly, the mailbox shielded much of the material from exploding
to the right.

1-Boston-Finish-line-explosion-2

Photo Item 9.

Again, nobody is blown into the road (Photo Item 9), which is what you’d expect if
the explosion was behind you, and you were at the fence.

Boston-Bombing-Pavement-Markers

Photo Item 10.


This picture of ‘official’ blast spot doesn’t make sense in comparison to the blast
evidence, specifically with regards to damage and direction.


Boston-Bombing-evidence-disposal

Photo Item 11.

Notice from this image how there appears to be no evidence of detonation from
the “official” blast zone in this picture (Photo Item 11). Note also how the tree is
already cut down, so quickly after the incident. However, notice the extreme
black/burn marks where the purse/garbage bag would have been that the man
kneeling down in the white CSI jumpsuit is working on cleaning(look close).

Boston-Bombing-Clean-up-team-removing-evidence

Photo Item 12.


Above (Photo Item 12) is another image, showing the blast evidence near the mailbox, but no blast evidence near the tree.

There is no evidence these women were injured even though they should probably
have been killed, as was the case with Lingzi Lu who was killed while standing
immediately behind the ‘purse lady’ (see earlier image in Photo Item 5).

In Summary

We have demonstrated quite clearly, that this particular bomb could have easily
been inside of the trash bag or purse.

If the defense objective is to show some reasonable doubt regarding the accused
placing a live bomb at the scene of the explosion, then why weren’t these exhibits
shown here included in the defense? If nothing else, these key pieces of evidence
should have been the centerpiece of the defense’s case of accused Boston Bomber
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev.

The lead defense attorney should have at least presented this evidence to try and
prove reasonable doubt for acquittal. From this it becomes self-evident that no real
attempt was ever made by defense attorney to put on a case for the client at all.

Also, some discussion is also warranted on how it makes no sense for a woman to
drop purse in front of fence, especially on top of a garbage bag, and even more so
because she didn’t appear to arrive or be together with the woman to her right.

In addition to this, according to ABC News, investigators discovered female DNA on
the remains of one of the bombs. The FBI claims that this DNA does not match that
of Katherine Russell, the ‘common law’ wife of deceased bomb suspect Tamerlan
Tsarnaev. Russell did not testify at Dzhokhar’s trial. Regardless of the results in this
line of inquiry, it’s just one more example which should point toward reasonable
doubt in this case.

Certainly, there is some real doubt in the minds of some victims. CBS News
reports how, in a statement to The Boston Globe, victim family members Jessica
Kensky and Patrick Downes have pleaded, “If there is anyone who deserves the
ultimate punishment, it is the defendant. However, we must overcome the impulse
for vengeance.”

They believe that their position is, “intensely emotional and profoundly practical.”

Like the Richards, they are calling for life in prison without parole or appeals – so as
to ensure that Dzhokhar Tsarnaev “disappears from our collective consciousness as
soon as possible.”

As long as the evidence is ignored, public doubt can never ‘disappear.’

There are still have too many unanswered questions surrounding this case. Until
they are answered, there will be no real closure of this dramatic and tragic event.

Listen Kurt Haskell and Patrick Henningsen break down the Boston Bombing today
in a special edition broadcast at 9:30am EST-11:00am/6:30am-8:30am PST, LIVE
on www.thepowerhour.com radio show, and at:

GCN Live: www.gcnlive.com
Talk Stream Live: www.talkstreamlive.com

READ MORE BOSTON BOMBING NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Boston Bombing Files
-
facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinteresttumblr
Read more: Defense of Dzhokhar: The Real Smoking Gun in Boston

http://21stcenturywire.com/2015/04/2...gun-in-boston/

[awakeningmom]

I found this article on the Truth & Shadows blog site to be a really good comprehensive article on the absurdity of the BMB -- and the lack of any semblance of a legitimate defense by the suspect's defense attorney. There were so many holes in this story that a real defense attorney would have had Tsarnaev off in no time -- but Judy Clarke failed. It seems to have been an intentionally botched defense.

https://truthandshadows.wordpress.co...oston-bombing/

[Cidersomerset]

Another interesting report awakeningmom , that mainstream media just ignore ......
https://truthandshadows.wordpress.co...oston-bombing/

There were so many holes in this story that a real defense attorney would have had
Tsarnaev off in no time -- but Judy Clarke failed. It seems to have been an intentionally botched defense.

They want us to believe its a Watertight case .....
That's more than the poor boat can say after being
riddled with 108 bullets . Almost as many holes as
seems to be in the prosecutions submissions or
the defences omissions .....

[awakeningmom]

Thanks, Cidersomerset. I just posted my own thread on my current thoughts about the trial itself so it wouldn't get lost in this long thread. If you have any insights on that aspect, i'd love your input!

[Cidersomerset]

posting for reference....

Nathan Folks Interview starts 26 mins in.......

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=D7mmM27-fGA

The Richie Allen TV Show EP01

Published on 4 May 2015


EP01 of The Richie Allen TV Show in association with davidicke.com

This week the show has an interview with Nathan Folks who claims the Boston Bombing was a produced event.

Join the discussion: https://www.facebook.com/therichieall...
Check out the nightly Richie Allen Radio Show, for more information please visit http://richieallenshow.com/

====================================================
====================================================

Boston Bombing Hoax Nathan Folks Interview HD

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=z7t0WiEBdIs

Published on 1 May 2014

[Cidersomerset]

Boston bombing trial: Death sentence for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev


5 minutes ago
From the section US & Canada
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev





A jury has sentenced Boston bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to the death penalty.

After 14 hours of deliberation, the jury of five men and seven women came to its decision.

Three people were killed and 260 were injured when Tsarnaev, now 21, and his brother
placed bombs at the finishing line of the Boston Marathon in 2013.

Jurors made findings on 12 factors that would support the death penalty and 21 mitigating
factors his defence said supported a life in prison verdict.

Seven of 30 charges Tsarnaev was convicted of allow the possibility of the death penalty.


Victims and their family members sobbed as the sentence was read. Tsarnaev bowed his
head but otherwise did not show emotion in court.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-32757790

[Curious77]

I think they kind of low-keyed this trial, probably because it was fairly clear that the public isn't
buying all of it. Didn't work as a show trial for "terrorism" that they might have originally been
working for ...
Or, maybe because they feared some hard questions being asked about the whole scam?

At any rate, what of the two brothers?
Do we really believe that the older one was killed?
Do we really believe that this younger one will be executed?

Isn't it possible that they are being forced to play out the whole thing --?
Perhaps the Mother/parents aren't really sure of what the involvement is or what
the end result may be?

Thank you to everyone who has presented evidence of this farce.

.

Posted by Cidersomerset (here)
Boston bombing trial: Death sentence for Dzhokhar Tsarnaev


5 minutes ago
From the section US & Canada
Dzhokhar Tsarnaev





A jury has sentenced Boston bomber Dzhokhar Tsarnaev to the death penalty.

After 14 hours of deliberation, the jury of five men and seven women came to its decision.

Three people were killed and 260 were injured when Tsarnaev, now 21, and his brother
placed bombs at the finishing line of the Boston Marathon in 2013.

Jurors made findings on 12 factors that would support the death penalty and 21 mitigating
factors his defence said supported a life in prison verdict.

Seven of 30 charges Tsarnaev was convicted of allow the possibility of the death penalty.


Victims and their family members sobbed as the sentence was read. Tsarnaev bowed his
head but otherwise did not show emotion in court.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-32757790

[East Sun]

Sandy Hook...

Six fallen educators---Does anyone know their names?

This may have been gone over many times but I missed out on it.

Also are there records --- in hospitals for example of victims of Sandy Hook?

Same /?? re Boston marathon victims?????????????