WADE FRAZIER : A Healed Planet

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Social animals are social because it enhances their ability to survive. Monkey societies are organized around a defensible food source and females and their offspring, with males patrolling the perimeter. African great apes changed that, as males became the center of social organization, and what a violent mess that is. There is no evidence of male-centric societies in the human line since then, until women’s economic contribution in horticultural societies resulted in matrilocal societies, which broke up the male gangs. Those were the most peaceful societies until the Industrial Revolution. Chimps also accomplished it, when an isolated population had its food supply double when gorillas left the region, so ending violent male rule is not the sole province of humans.

Women’s status has risen, fallen, and risen again in the journey of Homo sapiens, and each Epoch of the human journey had radically different social organization from the previous Epoch, and there is no reason to think that it will be different in the Fifth Epoch. Hunter-gatherers had enforced egalitarianism in the Second Epoch. In the Third, from peaceful beginnings it eventually turned violent, and the appearance of cities, professions, elites, and slaves characterized the Third Epoch, along with many other traits still with us.

The Fourth Epoch, which began as Europe raped humanity, saw more great changes in social organization. Slavery became economically obsolete and disappeared, a new breed of elite thief appeared, called “capitalist” today, and the agrarian masses were severed from the land and became cogs in the industrial system. But the rising standards of living that industrialization afforded allowed for more radical changes in social organization. Women’s status rose once again in the demographic transition, and being broodmares for agrarian economies became obsolete, and nearly all children lived to become adults. Industrial societies are radically different from agrarian ones.

However, the primary social unit, at least since the beginnings of the Domestication Revolution, and arguably since humans became behaviorally modern and maybe going all the way back to Homo erectus or even Ardi’s species, has been a mother and her offspring. Gorillas have a patriarch-harem social organization, with unrequited males constantly vying to become the new patriarch by violently unseating the current one. Chimps have a gang-style social organization, and if human societies had their style, it would be described as psychopathic. Bonobos ended psychopathic rule when their food supply doubled.

There is little reason to believe that social organization is not going to radically change in the Fifth Epoch, with probably the most radical changes of all. Elites will quickly become economically obsolete and will go the way of slaves. All exchange-related professions will largely, if not completely, disappear. Money will become meaningless and capitalism will go the way of all scarcity-based ideologies, in the Super-Epoch of Abundance.

What will very likely come to pass will be the end of the nuclear family, and what replaces it will be far superior. Modern women will no longer be trying to juggle five tasks at once, to run a household with children in them, while the man “does battle” in society to bring home the daily bread (if the mother is “lucky” and he is still in the household). Motherhood will no longer be a life of drudgery, and women will no longer be driven by economic desperation to make the decisions that they do, to keep a roof over the head of their children. Men will still obviously be in the picture, but they will no longer need to play the hero, to go out and bring home the daily bread. Men will be liberated from that constraining role.

Raising healthy children – physically, mentally, and emotionally – is the greatest task that humanity can undertake, and with the unprecedented riches of the Fifth Epoch, nobody is going to grow up in privation. Dealing with physical, mental, and emotional scars will no longer drive adult humans, and they will no longer inflict them on their offspring. That vicious cycle will end. Nobody in this world had to deal with childhood traumas, and in this world, their life was filled with trauma, from beginning to end. Which one do you want to live in?

There is much more to come, with this series of posts.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I have written that organized religion as we know it will end in the Fifth Epoch. What will also end is the religion of the Fourth Epoch: materialism. Of all the scarcity-based ideologies that dominate human thought today, the most sophisticated and subtle is materialism. I have also wedded it to rationalism in my writings, calling it the rational-materialist paradigm. I have written that I am not sure that a mystical awakening is required to be able to pursue FE, at least with my approach, but everybody that I most respected in the FE milieu had a mystical awakening, and they were almost all scientists or scientists-in-training, and some had global stature.

I was raised to be a scientist almost from infancy. I had my mystical awakening at age 16, which was in the age range for most of us, who had it in our late teens or early 20s. Brian O was an “old man” of 39, sipping his sherry in his soft berth in the Princeton physics department, when he had his mystical awakening while performing the same exercise that I did when I had mine. It is called a “remote viewing” today. Many scientific careers were ruined by mystical awakenings, as the awakened could no longer drink the sterile Kool-Aid of materialism. Materialism is just another religion, with its dogmas, popes, inquisitions, etc.

The giants of physics had worldviews that verged on the mystical, and were decidedly unimpressed with scientists who pretended that science was something other than what it was. The “skeptics” recently got a relatively tame challenge to materialism banned from TED, for instance, with their lies and irrationalities, which is very ironic for a movement that claims to advocate honest, rational inquiry. As far as I have seen, organized skepticism is a criminal enterprise.

When you have direct personal experience, which is dramatically irrefutable, you know that the materialistic models of consciousness are false. Once you know that, the entire edifice of the rationalist-materialist paradigm begins crumbling. The scientific process is great thing, as are many of its findings. Materialism is a philosophical stance, not a scientific one, and when materialism and science get confused, it is often purposeful, as the scientific enterprise gets turned into a religion, similar to how professional priesthoods created the first religious rackets.

While White Science has adopted a materialist stance on many issues, Black Science knows better. Black Science has also verged into what might be called “Black Magic” at times, as it has been used for evil ends.

If and when FE and related technologies come into public view from the dark recesses where they have been sequestered, today’s physics textbooks are going to make great doorstops. What may well come with that event is open acknowledgement of the ET presence, as at least some of those technologies were developed from reverse-engineering ET technologies. If those ETs are humanoid, as has been reported, the story of the evolutionary journey that led to humans is going to be radically overhauled. Those would be big days of revelation. I doubt that much, if any, materialistic thought would survive those events. Much else will fly out the window, too, but the end of materialism is going to be a great breath of fresh air.

The greatest physicists thought that dogma was the enemy, in science or religion, and when the Fifth Epoch begins, there will be great opportunity for the pursuit of enlightenment, greater than humanity has yet seen, and the spiritual practices of the Fifth Epoch will look nothing like today’s organized religion. What is called the New Age today is but a faint and distorted hint of what that can look like.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

This post will wrap up this series on what the Fifth Epoch can be like. The end of economic desperation will change many aspects of human societies and the human animal. Today, people drug themselves to enjoy a brief escape from their misery, from the poorest to richest nations. That practice will largely, if not completely, end. The medical establishment as we know it today will disappear, just like all the other rackets. Being healthy will be the goal, not diagnosing and treating disease. Almost all diseases will disappear and true prevention will be practiced, not the lucrative and violent interventions that masquerade as it, which we see today.

Bellicosity has been getting culled from the human gene pool, and I expect it to largely disappear in the Fifth Epoch. There won’t be any reason for it. Our chimp days are behind us. Fear will no longer be the primary operating principle of humanity. Love will. The dark pathers (AKA “very organized crime”) have had something to say about it, but their continued reign will result in Earth’s destruction, and the saner members of their cabal know it. They can no longer sit in the driver’s seat, but we all enabled them, in our blindly egocentric pursuits. Making them into another out-group is the path of delusion. They represent aspects of all of us, and have to be lovingly dethroned. But they can’t be the effort’s focus. Their coming obsolescence will be a mere side-effect, and some will even like living in heaven on Earth.

These visions that I have presented are far from the only positive ones being presented, but with FE and economic abundance, I consider the visions that I have presented to range from quite probable to highly likely. But without FE, almost none of them are feasible. The golden ages of the human past and the journey of life on Earth all rode on relative energy abundance. Humanity’s social changes were a result of the economic changes, which depended on the energy surplus. It has always been this way and likely always will. We can’t cleverly reshuffle the deck of scarcity and achieve abundance. The world does not work that way and never has. That was the primary reason behind my big essay. We have to have some understanding of how our world works if we want to consciously change it.

For the previous Epochs, they were all stumbled into, in one way or another, with nobody, not even the inventors, having the slightest inkling what those innovations would lead to. Those days are over. The Global Controllers have a very good idea what FE means, and have been actively presenting its manifestation in the public sphere for longer than I have been alive, but there also have been many levels of that game. No need to “credit” the Big Boys with all of the organized suppression. Thousands of inventors have stumbled into FE technology, but really had no idea what they stumbled into, as they marched into the lion’s den like lambs to the slaughter. As with all Epochs, the masses react with denial and fear if FE is even mentioned, and the few who don’t quickly get carried away, announcing that they are the Messiah, plan to become the Bill Gates of FE, think that the Global Controllers don’t exist or can be snuck past, can be exposed or defeated in battle, can get run over by a populist stampede, etc. I have seen it all. What those approaches all have in common is fear. Only a loving approach has a prayer, IMO. But love is not enough; it has to be wedded with sentience and wisdom, which comes from worldliness. That is the point of my work.

The primary lesson of my harsh journey was that personal integrity is the world’s scarcest commodity (which I resisted every step of the way), as people live in fear, with their awareness rarely extending past their immediate self-interest. It is just what it is, and it does no good judge the sleeping, living their egocentric nightmares. I know that my approach will work, if I can find enough people with the right stuff. That will be the hard part, as well as building something self-sustaining before the Global Controllers decide that if they take me out, then the threat is averted. Those people are going to be needles in haystacks, but they are the only people who can give an effort like mine a chance of success.

The visions in this series of posts comprise stars to steer by, not only so that people understand what is feasible with FE and related technologies, but why. I am taking what might be called Bucky Fuller’s approach, of developing comprehensive perspectives so that people can truly understand what abundance means. In our world of scarcity and fear, comprehending abundance, much less keeping a vision of it high in our awareness, is no easy trick. If those in the choir can keep their eye on the ball and refrain from being sucked into the million distractions and dead ends that beckon, we just might be able to make a dent.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I have been in JFK land recently, am in the middle of Nick Lane’s latest (superb, as usual), and am going to be very busy over the next several days, but today was a day of play, attached. It was a winter wonderland on my favorite local mountain, and a hiking bud and I owned it all the way up. We hit the snow fairly early on, and it got two-feet deep in spots, but was generally “only” about a foot deep. It was one of those “This is why I live here” days. Hiking on snow can take it out of you, but it was trail that had been packed down by hikers, and we had traction gear, so it was delightful.

After this week, I am going to be chained to my desk until spring, so will likely have a fairly quiet winter of posting. I plan to plunk along on version 1.3 of the big essay over the winter, in my “spare” time, updating it for the places where recent reading has taken me, especially those Ward/Kirschvink/Lane books. No major revisions, just tweaks. Energy is still the name of the game, and Lane’s book gets explicit on that issue on early life on Earth. If people are not practicing scientists, I would recommend something like my big essay before tackling those works. Those scientists are writing for the popular audience, but it is not easy stuff, conceptually. It seems that Lane expects that his audience is somewhat familiar with chemistry.

Because I am a one-man show, with a little help from my friends (and sometimes more than a little ), I need to get the material as good as I can make it in these early stages, before I seek a larger audience more actively. Again, I expect that building the choir will be a long, slow process. The biggest event in the human journey will not happen overnight.

Best,

Wade

[Servant Limestone]

Meow:

I just want to say Happy New Year to everyone. May you all have a great 2016! May our planet have a great 2016! May we see something truly wonderful, and you all know what I mean. It's 11pm now here approaching the New Year so I just want to greet everybody now.

By the way, Wade, did you already saw the new Star Wars film? What do you think? I am actually not surprised at all that George Lucas ended up almost regretting the fact that he sold his rights to the franchise and everything to Disney. His interview with Charlie Rose is very revealing. He liked it but he doesn't love it. That's the way I see it. The movie is great, in a way, and I've watched it twice and I am going to watch it again. I like it... but I am also still on a hang-over on the previous Expanded Universe (EU) material that the Disney just scrapped for money making purposes in terms of not wanting to pay royalties to EU creators for their characters and concepts to be adapted for the sequels. That's the speculation why. I just love the characters there like Mara Jade, Kyle Katarn, the Solo twins, etc. The Old Republic material too. They are not going to adapt them. The old cannon is now just "Legends". It's over. And Disney didn't adopt Lucas' script for the movie. I'm not sure if it's for the better or for the worse but seems to be more of the latter since George Lucas' script seems close to the EU storylines. I don't like everything from the EU but I like parts of it, and popular parts of it from die hard fans. It's just money making. Disney is going to milk as much as it can from the franchise.

I'm not that familiar with Star Trek but I heard that Disney or JJ Abrams kind of "reset" the storyline based on the latest movie? That's kind of terrible... I don't know. Well, I'll stop and I just want to say Happy New Year to you Wade and your family. Stay safe.

Happy 2016 to everyone!

Meow Meow,

Serg.

[Wade Frazier]

To all: Happy 2016.

I am sure that it will be an “interesting” year.

Hi Serg:

As you know, I was a movie junkie when young, and saw Star Wars nine times in the theater, only exceeded by Raiders. I saw the new Star Wars the other day, only because I saw the rave reviews. I can barely remember the second trilogy, it was so unremarkable.

What Abrams got right about this one is keeping the corny cartoonish air that the original Star Wars had. That naïve earnestness is charming (“It was the right thing to do!” ). As I have written, I am a much bigger fan of Star Trek, as it is more about the human potential. You don’t see me citing Star Wars in visions of the future. So, I was never into the extended Star Wars universe, and really don’t know anything about it, but I’ll agree that when the “suits” get involved, they wreck the creative potential. That game of getting out of paying royalties is common in all entertainment. Few inventors ever make any money off of their patents (much less FE patents). It is a game that only big corporations can play.

Yes, the new Star Trek movies are more like space opera than the kind of idealistic journey of exploration in the TV shows. The Star Trek TV shows, especially TNG, were about reaching the human potential, and as such, represent about the best that ever came from Hollywood. Not many shows really ever did that.

As I have written plenty, I did not “get” fiction until my father handed me The Hobbit when I was 14. I have been a science fiction and fantasy junkie ever since, and reward hard writing on Wade’s World with fantasy, often of the epic kind. It helps keep my imagination limber. I used to read Lord of the Rings every five years, but have not read it for many years. One day, I will again. Robert Jordan’s The Wheel of Time series was extraordinary, at least for the first six books, and is what I have read the most of over the past 25 years. Those first six books have been regular bedtime companions. Arguably the best epic fantasy in the past generation has been Robin Hobb’s work, and Fitz and the Fool are some of the greatest characters of any genre. That the author is a woman is likely no accident, as she avoids the Boy’s Club stuff that plagues epic fantasy, even though her primary characters are men. Raymond Feist’s early work was exceptional, and Brandon Sanderson is the hot new kid on the block. My wife is big into Game of Thrones, so we watch the series and read the books, but like a bunch of series that I have read, I would not specifically recommend it.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

As I have written, my work hurricane begins now, and I will likely be pretty quiet until spring, with my main writing task over the winter being tweaking my big essay for my reading during the past year, especially the recent Ward, Kirschvink, and Lane books. I intended my big essay to be like a college textbook, which will be revised periodically for new findings, like all science textbooks are. I doubt that I will update the rest of my site much (that 2014 re-edit of my site, to align it with my big essay, I will likely not do again), but the big essay will be updated until I can’t do it anymore or we get to use FE in our daily lives.

The big essay covers such vast territory that there will always be material to update, but the basic theme, of the central role of energy, I don’t expect to change. In fact, what I have noticed in recent years is that science and scholarship has increasingly focused on the energy issue, as Lane’s latest book does.

The issue of civilization collapses and running out of energy has really only become a scholarly theme in the past generation, and seeing scientists and scholars focusing on energy being the basis of economics has also been wonderful to see, and way overdue. I did not entirely invent my Epochal Event framework, but I did invent the Second and Fifth Epochs (and my framework is significantly different from others I have seen, in ways), and the day that an enlightened, worldly, and comprehensive, Fuller-ish discussion of the Fifth Epoch is mounted anywhere in cyberspace, my work will be finished. I intend it to begin in my forum, as my recruits begin hitting the notes, but I don’t expect it to stop there.

Because my effort is mostly a one-man show for now, I need to get the material as good as I can get it, before I try to expand my audience much. It is far more about the notes, not the numbers, especially at this stage of the game.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

“Going quiet,” as I wrote, is relative, for me. A few themes have been rolling around in my head lately, and one is a subject of recent conversations with a pal who first heard of FE from me. I have been doing this for so many years that I only talk about my life’s work with people who already know me, and I probably have done it more in my professional life than anyplace else, as far as with “new” people, as I spend most of my waking hours there. I sure don’t walk the halls, spouting Wade’s World tales, but I am a respected professional, and the people I talk to in professional settings are already acquainted with my professional abilities, so they know that I am not crazy. But I definitely choose my spots.

If a person hears of FE and gets past denial, fear, lazy acceptance, or a feeling of hopelessness (when the obstacles are considered), they almost always talk about it with their social circles, which is normal. If they talk with their social circles, just in an inquiring way, not as an advocate, but just asking their social circles if they heard of FE, most people will not have really heard of it at all, but those who have will almost always have denial and fear reactions, and those who first hear of FE also react with denial and fear. People will rarely react positively.

If FE newcomers approach their social circles as an advocate of FE, they should be prepared to be ostracized. The reactions can be quite violent. I have watched friendships end, family relationships get strained and even end, and careers have ended when people proselytized to their social circles. The fraction of humanity that will react positively and in a somewhat enlightened manner to the idea of FE is less than one-in-a-thousand. Those are just the numbers, and it does no good to judge the situation. Since humans can only manage social circles of 250 people or so, the odds of FE advocates finding fellow travelers in their social circles are small. If such people are lucky, they will find one or two who will react productively, but they should also be prepared to lose many times more relationships if they go “fishing” in their social circles that way.

My best students always proselytize to their social circles, even after being warned, as they had to find out for themselves. I always get to hear their stories, but the best of them do not stop there and return sobered up from their initial enthusiasm. Brian O banged on the biggest doors on Earth for five years, playing the Paul Revere of FE, before I got to hear from him how it went, and he began openly wondering if humanity was a sentient species. There is no social circle, no organization not already devoted to the issue, no gathering on Earth that is going to react in anything approaching a positive and enlightened manner to the idea of FE. It took me many years to understand what we were seeing, and I eventually concluded that people were addicted to their survival mechanisms in a world of scarcity, and FE and abundance meant the end of the world as they knew it. Even the least intelligent of them began to understand that pretty quickly, and it scared them. Their niche in a world of scarcity and fear would vanish with FE and abundance, and they could never see beyond losing their niche, not what that world beyond scarcity and fear could look like.

I will end this post with an observation on the more sophisticated denial reactions, which usually come from scientists, academics, and the “smart.” The most common are the “laws of physics” objection and the denial of organized suppression as a “conspiracy theory.” They are often accompanied by an outright fear that with FE, humanity would quickly destroy Earth via warfare or strip mining it. I recently dealt with the warfare and strip mining objection, I am living evidence of the organized suppression, as are my fellow travelers – there is no theory to those “conspiracies,” as far as their existence, but who, why, and how are open to debate. I have seen and experienced way too much of it, so I know how real it is, and am decidedly unimpressed with expressions of denial of that reality. But I want to deal a little with the “laws of physics” objection in this post.

As Brian O often said, there are no “laws” of physics, only theories. When anybody says “laws of physics,” they are portraying a body of theory as some absolute fact, which is similar to religious dogma. Science is ideally about doubt, not faith, and that quasi-certitude term “law” really has no place in science, or it has a very limited application that has been greatly abused by people as a knee-jerk response to the unfamiliar. As Einstein said, every theory is killed by a fact. A cousin to the “laws of physics” objection is to try to make reports of FE fit into orthodox physics concepts, or else declare them invalid. Many of the greatest breakthroughs in science and technology had the inventions and data predate the theories that described how they worked.

The steam engine was invented more than a century before thermodynamic theory was developed to state how it worked. The Wright brothers were flying for five years while the scientific establishment ignored and ridiculed them, and even stated that heavier than air-flight was “impossible” (and Brian said that the climate in the scientific establishment is worse today than a century ago). The anomaly of the Michelson-Morley experiment predated Einstein’s special theory of relativity by a generation. Inventions and experiments have regularly gone far past the day’s prevailing theories, and the steam engine, powered flight, and relativity theory posed no immediate threat to economic empires, while FE technology will make all of them obsolete, and the global elite know it.

I have been directly involved with technologies that are still declared “impossible” by people, especially scientists and the technically trained, even when the data has been robust and decades old, and I have looked into others. When people invoke the “laws of physics” to deny FE’s possibility, they are ignorant of the history of science and technology, and when they dismiss organized suppression as a “conspiracy theory,” they are ignorant of how the world really works, and prefer their ideological stances over reality.

What my friend was shown blew his mind, but it was no big deal to Brian, or would be to my fellow travelers who traveled the high road. When the “laws of physics” objection is leveled against FE, such responses are ignorant of what one of Einstein’s protégés theorized, for instance. The “laws of physics” objection is ludicrous.

What all such objections essentially state is this: “When you can deliver an FE device into my hands, I will believe in its existence.” It is normal and Machiavelli remarked on it. Such people need to be left alone until FE can be delivered into their lives. They are not going to wake up before then, and that is normal.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

As the new year begins and I am about to get relatively quiet, I would like to reflect a little on my approach, what I hope to accomplish, and the people I seek.

I am 57 today and have been on my energy quest since I was 16, when my first professional mentor’s engine began making waves. If I am fortunate, I will have another 30 good years or so in me, to continue along this path. I was trained to be a scientist almost from the time I could walk. I had my mystical and cultural awakenings when I was 16, which led to a paranormal event when I was 19, which changed my studies from science to business. Eight mostly frustrating years later, another paranormal event landed me in the middle of the greatest effort ever made to bring alternative energy to the marketplace. I came to realize that my fellow travelers had similar preposterous events during their journeys, from voices in their heads to remote viewings to mystical awakenings that led to inventing FE prototypes, and other events that were far larger than life. Such experiences can give people a keen sense of purpose.

Very few from the public can believe that such events happened, but when you live them, you know. Even I sometimes look back on the events of my life and wonder if they really happened, so the public’s denial is quite understandable. Virtually all of my fellow travelers had such awakening events, were usually scientists or scientists in training, and we all discovered the hard way how the world really works. Those awakening events were not easy to survive, and most of my fellow travelers are either dead or “retired,” often due to the organized suppression, which was regularly fatal.

The proportion of the population that can even comprehend that milieu is vanishingly small, as people cling to their favorite ideologies, which our experiences blow out of the water. Sometimes my fellow travelers would give up and seek the nearest rocking chair, but the best of them kept going until the end of their lives.

The list of failed approaches that I compiled is not theory or rumor, but what my fellow travelers and I experienced. We have twisted that Rubik’s Cube every way that we could think of. It was from decades of trying and witnessing failed approaches, and trading notes with my fellow travelers, that I arrived at my current approach. Nobody has ever tried it before, and very few people have any comprehension of what I am attempting. With numbing regularity, people approach me, dragging the baggage of their scarcity-based frameworks, thinking that they have the key missing ingredient. Without exception, they are variants of those failed approaches. The free energy field has been in a state of arrested development for longer than I have been alive, very few in the field today have the right stuff, and I no longer have anything to do with the field, nor do I want to.

I recently made a series of posts on what those with the right stuff for this task have in common, made some posts on what has not worked and why, and why my approach just might help. If anything, it won’t hurt, as it seeks to mount a comprehensive, arguably enlightened effort, which will not be very susceptible to humanity’s inertia and the organized suppression. However, it will be a long, slow journey, even while humanity stands on the brink of the abyss. Impatience is my Achilles heel, and this approach has been teaching me patience, in the face of mounting desperation, as my great nation is on the brink of igniting World War III, if it has not already begun.

I am approached all the time by people who want to try this and that, want to drag in their pet ideologies, proclivities, and bright ideas, and when I inform them that they need to leave them at the door, they almost always disappear. Some may return, and I will be here when they do.

I wrote just yesterday that my best pupils invariably try out the idea of free energy with their social circles, even when I warn them to be cautious, but they have to go find out for themselves, and that is OK. If they were lucky, they were not ostracized, and pretty much all of them tell me how they wrecked some relationships (with family, friends, and colleagues), became pariahs in certain circles, and so on. But they came back to me, sobered up from their initial enthusiasm, were more willing to learn, and realized that I was not making it up.

Energy has always been the name of the game on Earth, and the generation of an energy surplus has always been the key measure of the viability of organisms, species, ecosystems, and civilizations. The last days of the Hydrocarbon Age are upon us, and history’s richest and most powerful nation has been declining ever since its energy consumption peaked. If we don’t transition to an abundant and harmless energy source, and soon, it may well be Game Over for humanity, and we might take most of Earth’s complex life with us.

Lockheed’s recent announcement of commercial fusion is an attempt by the Global Controllers to have their cake and eat it too, so that the new energy source will still be subjected to capitalist constraints. I can live with that, but I know that technology exists today that makes such technologies seem like a campfire. The Fifth Epoch will put an end to elites and they know it, which is why they have been so active in keeping such technologies suppressed and sequestered.

People might say that I am attempting to wreck the elite game, and they would be right, but I wish those elites no harm. Some of them will even like living in something that resembles heaven on Earth, but their days of being “in charge” are swiftly coming to an end.

Peace on Earth, goodwill to all,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Before I tackle some more chores, a brief post…

I seek to wreck the elite game, but I also seek to end the game that their slaves play, which is the mass of humanity. Both sides play the scarcity, fear, and survival game. It is baked into our paradigms, and neither side is willing to let go. But it was like this before all Epochal Events, when nobody could imagine anything different from what was familiar to them. The elites cannot be the focus of an effort like mine, and neither can the masses. Neither group has what it takes to make it happen. The global elite are committed to preventing the next Epoch from manifesting, as it means Game Over for them and they know it, and the masses oblige them, with perspectives that rarely extend beyond their immediate self-interest.

For their part, the masses are addicted to their survival mechanisms, which include their favorite ideologies, and that includes the so-called smart. The problem is primarily one of the heart, not the head. Humanity’s social changes have always been a result of their economic reality, not a cause. Slavery appeared with the Third Epoch because it made economic sense, and it ended as a hallowed institution in the Fourth Epoch, when it no longer made economic sense, not from some bout of conscience out of the blue. The social approach has never worked, and never will work, for Epochal change.

Warfare has always had an underlying economic rationale. Warfare as a way of life will end when it no longer makes any economic sense, and that will only happen when scarcity ends. I have written that humanity will become largely, if not exclusively, vegetarian in the Fifth Epoch, and will no longer rape Earth’s ecosystems, because humanity will no longer “need” to, in order to live comfortably. Eating animals will be seen as a close cousin to cannibalism, and razing forests will be seen as incredibly primitive and barbaric, in the Fifth Epoch, as ethical and aesthetic standards leap upwards by orders of magnitude.

But don’t expect the masses to even begin to raise their awareness and ethics to those levels until economic abundance makes it feasible, and don’t expect the elites to willingly give up their games of power and control. Their addiction is arguably the most entrenched on Earth, as the addictions of the masses pale in comparison.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I finished Nick Lane’s latest book today. He is always worth reading, and he is held in high regard amongst scientists (Peter Ward gave him a specific accolade in his latest). I’ll be digesting Lane’s book for some time, before I update my big essay for the past year’s reading. The book’s most trenchant statement is at the end, “Incorporating energy into evolution is long overdue…” I have found this idea in recent work on economics and the collapse of civilizations, and energy’s role has also been underplayed in biology. Energy is the ballgame, but on many fronts, even scientific, it has been underplayed, even to the point of invisibility, such as in neoclassical economic theory. I have to wonder how conspiratorial that situation has been.

I can only hope that my big essay is only slightly ahead of its time.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

This barrage of posts is coming to a screeching halt, and soon.

There are times when I sit back and wonder about what I am doing, how I got here, etc. If I look at my site as it stands today, I can see how I was groping toward what it became back when I began hitting the books in 1990, after my life was shattered and I was radicalized. But it was by no means a straightforward process. I now know that I was a comprehensivist-in-training, but I did not even know what that meant until after finishing the 2002 version of my site, which is still the site’s meat today (everything from here down was part of that 2002 version, and some above it, such as the introductory and visionary essays), and one of Bucky Fuller’s pupils had me read some of Bucky’s work, and the lightbulb finally went on. My work has been more consciously comprehensive ever since, and I can look back at those early essays and see what I was struggling toward. I did not need to revise them much during my 2014 editorial process, to get them aligned with my big essay.

What I was doing, which I could not have articulated back in 2002, was deflating all of the in-group ideologies that I had been imbued with. You don’t see me take on organized religion, mainly because I was not really raised with it, thankfully. Also, it is a Third Epoch ideology that is increasingly irrelevant in Fourth Epoch societies, and I was more concerned with deflating the Fourth Epoch ideologies. Materialism is the religion of the Fourth Epoch.

Today, I can see what I was heading toward, by deflating all of the in-group ideologies, which always justify ill treatment of the out-group. The most enlightened message to humanity was given by Jesus most famously: there is no out-group. That is what I was aiming toward, in a kind of backdoor way, by deflating all of the in-group ideologies of my culture. If we can begin to see all of humanity, all life on Earth, even all of Creation, as our in-group, we are on our way to enlightenment, IMO. Even the Global Controllers are one of us, as much as conspiracists hate to admit it, as much as structuralists continue to deny their existence.

Anthropologists have said that if there has truly been any social “progress” in humanity during the human journey, it has been a continual expansion of people’s in-groups.

A major goal of my work is for those in the choir to relinquish all in-group ideologies, or actively work on shedding them. Another key goal is for the choir to gain a comprehensive understanding of the central role that energy has always played on Earth, and especially how each energy source the humanity has tapped has formed the foundation of each of humanity’s Epochs. It takes some scientific literacy to understand. I wrote my big essay for laypeople (I am one myself), and doubt that people need to be professional scientists to understand. When that comprehensive, energy-centric perspective is developed, people can focus on what is important, and be immune from the million distractions that beckon in today’s world.

Then, the combined positive intention of people with the right stuff just might be able to make a dent. That is really what I am doing, but it took decades of trial and error for me to come up with my approach. There are plenty of other approaches, but nobody has tried mine yet that I know of, and we will see how it goes.

Best,

Wade

[ulli]

Posted by Wade Frazier (here)
Hi:

This barrage of posts is coming to a screeching halt, and soon.

There are times when I sit back and wonder about what I am doing, how I got here, etc. If I look at my site as it stands today, I can see how I was groping toward what it became back when I began hitting the books in 1990, after my life was shattered and I was radicalized. But it was by no means a straightforward process. I now know that I was a comprehensivist-in-training, but I did not even know what that meant until after finishing the 2002 version of my site, which is still the site’s meat today (everything from here down was part of that 2002 version, and some above it, such as the introductory and visionary essays), and one of Bucky Fuller’s pupils had me read some of Bucky’s work, and the lightbulb finally went on. My work has been more consciously comprehensive ever since, and I can look back at those early essays and see what I was struggling toward. I did not need to revise them much during my 2014 editorial process, to get them aligned with my big essay.

What I was doing, which I could not have articulated back in 2002, was deflating all of the in-group ideologies that I had been imbued with. You don’t see me take on organized religion, mainly because I was not really raised with it, thankfully. Also, it is a Third Epoch ideology that is increasingly irrelevant in Fourth Epoch societies, and I was more concerned with deflating the Fourth Epoch ideologies. Materialism is the religion of the Fourth Epoch.

Today, I can see what I was heading toward, by deflating all of the in-group ideologies, which always justify ill treatment of the out-group. The most enlightened message to humanity was given by Jesus most famously: there is no out-group. That is what I was aiming toward, in a kind of backdoor way, by deflating all of the in-group ideologies of my culture. If we can begin to see all of humanity, all life on Earth, even all of Creation, as our in-group, we are on our way to enlightenment, IMO. Even the Global Controllers are one of us, as much as conspiracists hate to admit it, as much as structuralists continue to deny their existence.

Anthropologists have said that if there has truly been any social “progress” in humanity during the human journey, it has been a continual expansion of people’s in-groups.

A major goal of my work is for those in the choir to relinquish all in-group ideologies, or actively work on shedding them. Another key goal is for the choir to gain a comprehensive understanding of the central role that energy has always played on Earth, and especially how each energy source the humanity has tapped has formed the foundation of each of humanity’s Epochs. It takes some scientific literacy to understand. I wrote my big essay for laypeople (I am one myself), and doubt that people need to be professional scientists to understand. When that comprehensive, energy-centric perspective is developed, people can focus on what is important, and be immune from the million distractions that beckon in today’s world.

Then, the combined positive intention of people with the right stuff just might be able to make a dent. That is really what I am doing, but it took decades of trial and error for me to come up with my approach. There are plenty of other approaches, but nobody has tried mine yet that I know of, and we will see how it goes.

Best,

Wade

I identify totally with what you say here, Wade.
Like you, I believe I have been in training for that comprehensive
viewpoint, but my obsessive type of thinking has directed me more towards communicating it in slogan form.
Or pictures.
Finding that punchy one-liner that says it all.

My fashion career came to a grinding halt when I had my awakening in 1977,
as I could no longer be a servant/slave dress maker for the elite.
My former heroes like Yves Saint Laurent and Karl Lagerfeld have been replaced by the system reformer or system designer Baha'u'llah, and later, after seeing that his efforts were derailed, by the Brian O'Learys and Wade Fraziers of this world.

[Wade Frazier]

Hi Ulli:

I think that awakening can happen in any walk of life. Some are easier than others, and working for the elite can be a very good way to come to an understanding. Playing the fashion game was like being a house slave, and there are definitely incentives to stay asleep, as the perks for playing along are many, so you did something very rare.

Mine began in an elite setting, playing auditor for the corporate elite and eventually realizing that my efforts were worthless. I was a financial dressmaker, creating a fancy but empty illusion. Dennis and Ralph served the elite in Vietnam. Dennis literally had blood on his hands, while Ralph smelled the napalm. Some, like my relative who was a CIA contract agent, never really figured it out, but drank themselves to death as part of the price. Dennis nearly did not survive his moment of awakening. Mine was gentler, although it capped a dozen years of gradual disillusionment, ever since that voice first spoke to me.

Brian was a sherry-sipping Ivy League professor when he had his mystical awakening. Late in his life, Brian said that if he knew what he was in for, he would have kept sipping his sherry.

What I found during my journey, especially my days with Dennis, is that we have to raise our games far above slogans if we are going to make a dent. Dennis constantly tried to find ways to make it easy for people. Heck, they just had to wait for Dennis to put the world’s best heating system on their homes for free. Their “skin in the game” was about zero. Dennis shouldered all the risk, and should be dead dozens of times over.

Brian also tried to whip up mass movements, drawing on his activist days, playing protestor, etc. He founded idealistic, activist organizations, and got kicked out of them. Until the end of his life, he was a man of the people, like Dennis, trying to get that stampede going. I faithfully carried their spears, but gradually realized that there was something wrong with the picture. They survived murder attempts from Godzilla and friends, and it shortened Brian’s life, but the betrayals by their allies were the big surprises. You could not have convinced me of that when I became Dennis’s partner, even after watching my boss help steal Dennis’s company. Dennis had that populist zeal, but a decade later, Dennis admitted reality, and I had long ago learned my journey’s primary lesson.

But, fool that I am, I signed up with Dennis again and helped Brian found NEM, and after the NEM experience was a disaster, with Brian once again kicked out of the organization that he founded, I said that I was done carrying anybody’s spears. When Dennis came to my home to invite me to the White House a couple of years later, I nearly kicked him out. But I still carried Brian’s spears at the end of his life, helping him approach the DOE and NASA, and becoming his biographer, and Dennis still tries to get me into the saddle with him. My wife was glad that I signed up with Dennis again in 1996 and helped found NEM in 2003, as “I got it out of my system.” That is relative, however, as I keep doing what I do, seeing a crack in the dam that might be an opportunity.

It is like that Grateful Dead song, of what a long, strange trip it has been. If you had told me what I was in for, I would have never believed it. So, when I look back at my earlier writings and see what I was groping toward, a lot comes up for me. I can see how I was burrowing toward the truth the whole time, but it was an adventure, with many detours and distractions along the way.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Not long ago, I wrote a series of posts on vaccination. I wrote of the damage caused by free radicals, industrial toxins, the garbage that Americans ingest and call food, and such drugs as cigarette smoke (the active ingredient is nicotine) and alcohol. I mentioned that I finished reading Nick Lane’s latest book yesterday. I feel compelled to make an early comment on his book, and to also comment on something that I see all the time in the mainstream media.

Anybody who questions vaccination’s safety and effectiveness is not only called crazy, but is portrayed as an active threat to public health. There is a huge illusion promoted that medical science is above the fray, simply seeking what is the highest and best for human health. Bigger lies have seldom been told. Western medicine is a huge racket, and it is not all that hard to find MDs and scientists who publicly admit it. Of course, their careers are over when they do that, but they are out there. They often challenge the dogma of heart disease, cancer, and the approved treatments. Once in a while, the establishment will embrace the work of the crucified pioneers, without giving them any credit, of course. It recently happened with heart disease.

Rife and Naessens developed optical microscopes that attained “impossible” resolutions, but you will almost never see an establishment scientist admit it, like Galileo’s contemporaries who refused to look through his telescope. Those scopes’ findings confirmed the pleomorphic reality that Pasteur’s contemporary documented, whom Pasteur seems to have plagiarized in his quest for fame and fortune. Not only did their findings threaten the very foundation of modern medicine, but they developed highly effective disease treatments based on their findings, especially cancer. They performed many experiments that achieved “believe it or not” results, and those results have been studiously ignored by Establishment science.

Rife’s microscope was the world’s most powerful when he invented it, and his lab became a scientific mecca before he was wiped out, but he is an ignored or reviled figure today. Naessens is still around, and scientists come away amazed after visiting his lab. Where is the stampede of scientists and doctors, trying to reproduce their findings? The silence is deafening, and when a man began to play the FDA’s game to have Naessens’s treatment approved in the USA, he was kangarooed into prison. That is standard procedure in the medical racket, but anybody who questions vaccination or fluoridation or provides cheap, harmless, and effective cancer treatment is portrayed as a malevolent threat to the public’s health. Orwell’s world is alive and well.

I finished my series of vaccination posts with my hypothesis on what is happening, as organisms fail. Lane’s latest book supports my view, although that was certainly not his intention. The free radical theory of aging has apparently been falsified in its initial conception, but Lane still thinks that it is valid, in a subtler way. Lane returned to the comparison of a pigeon and rat, as they are both about the same size, with the same metabolism, but a pigeon only produces 10% of the free radicals that a rat does and lives ten times as long. Lane advocates a slightly different dynamic. Programmed cell death happens when a cell has been sufficiently damaged. Free radicals and other insults cause that damage. Free radical production in the electron transport chain is the mechanism of programmed cell death, as they react with the mitochondrial membrane and sever the electron transport chain, which immediately halts ATP production, and the cell instantly starves to death, as if it ingested cyanide.

But most cell types can be replaced, so it is not that big a deal to dismantle a cell, feed its neighbors with its carcass, and grow new cells. However, there are highly specialized cells that cannot be made anew, such as brain and muscle cells. When one of those dies, it is not replaced. Lane thinks that programmed cell death in those vital and non-reproducing cells is what brings on aging, as fewer remaining cells try to do the work that more cells formerly did, and they get overworked and break down, meeting their maker through programmed cell death, so there is a positive feedback cascade effect to those cells, and that is why we age.

Birds run such a high-performance and “clean ship” that programmed cell death happens at only 10% of the rate of rat cells, and Lane thinks that free radicals must be part of the dynamic. In the end, high-performance equipment (flying is the highest level of energy performance that any animal can make) is of higher quality and does not wear out as quickly as cheaply made equipment, and that analogy seems to apply to the difference between rats and pigeons. It is an energy game, as always.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

A little synchronicity today, as I just saw this on fluoridation. I cite Bryson’s work a lot in my fluoride essay.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

Before my hurricane at my day job begins, which won’t end until spring, if then, here is a short post. One of the most sober voices on the financial scene just published his latest, and a Peak Oiler recently held forth. In the absence of a new energy source, the Peak Oiler stance is unassailable. The wars in Oil Country are likely just getting warmed up, and World War III may be the outcome, if it is not already.

I have been writing some reflective posts lately, and this will be another one. I have written plenty on what the people I seek will likely have in common and won’t belabor it, but this morning I will touch on some obstacles to my plan. It is a given that almost nobody has what I seek, but for those who do, I do not propose an easy task.

Part of the problem is that humans are social animals, and I have written plenty on the hazards of approaching one’s social circles with my material. But even if my pupils refrain from engaging their social circles, there is a constant pull from people’s social circles, to be a member of the herd, the constant draw to drink the Kool-Aid of the dominant ideologies, to not even question their tenets. People who buy into those in-group ideologies abdicate their sentience to the degree that they do. The siren song of sleep and herd conformity issues from nearly every mouth, blares from Orwell’s telescreens, dominates the Internet anymore, and anything “progressive” or “conservative” is all about slicing up humanity’s scarce and shrinking economic pie a little differently, and not even dealing with how it can be made bigger, etc.

How to avoid getting sucked into that vortex? I work in corporate America and know how hard it is. All I can say is that it is not easy, to know how it can be, while seeing what it is. In order to navigate that terrain, people need ways to be grounded and maintain their internal anchors, or else they are going to go flying off the handle, go off the deep end, become addicted to dysfunctional coping mechanisms, and so on. I have seen so many casualties on my journey. I watched people wreck their lives, lose their lives, lose their sanity, and so on. I will always be picking up the pieces of my shattered life, and am grateful that I did not permanently become a quivering pile of wrecked nerves, drink myself to death, and so on. I have had to eliminate people from my life, such as all of my immediate family, who decided to attack me, generally because they could not handle the realities that my journey encountered. My mother’s “my son the criminal” scrapbook tour was actually a benign event, compared to what others did.

What I ask of my readers is no mean feat, to shed our mind-and-soul-entrapping ideologies and conditioning while not becoming estranged from our social circles. To keep our eyes on the ball and refrain from getting entangled in the million distractions that beckon, to maintain our sanity through it all – not many have what it takes to do that, and I am here to help my pupils stay on the straight and narrow, and it is not easy, given the limitations of the Internet, as awesome a communication tool as it is.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

I am reading Steven Kinzer’s Overthrow and may read the whole thing, but he is definitely from the liberal side of the house. I have a few of his books, as he focuses on the USA’s foreign policy. Kinzer was a New York Times correspondent, with all the bias that entails, and his work is strange. It criticizes the USA’s foreign policy, but does it benignly enough that it gets glowing reviews from the New York Times and other mainstream media outlets such as the Washington Post. Kinzer acted as hagiographer for Paul Kagame, whom Uncle Ed depicted as another genocidist on behalf of American interests, picked from the small ruling class to rule the majority, in standard imperial style. I did some digging and located one of the damning documents, showing that the USA knew early on that the killings were of the majority Hutu by the Tutsis, which Ed used in his work. Uncles Noam and Ed tellingly revealed Kinzer’s reporting biases in Central America in Manufacturing Consent, and you won’t find Kinzer citing William Blum (or Uncle Noam! ), who is the dean of dissecting American foreign policy.

Over the years, I have noticed a spectrum of awareness, and it goes back to that in-group awareness. People can almost always be counted on to defend their in-group, with the most strained logic and selective use of the facts. In my experience, only saints like Uncles Noam, Ed, Howard, Mike Parenti, etc. have the personal integrity to lay aside almost all of their in-group loyalties and ascend to the ethical high ground of taking their in-group to task (e.g., Americans taking on American foreign policy). Those on the “right” are generally the most irrational defenders of their in-group, and the non-elite right also tend to make the elite into an out-group, and conspiracy theories are their stock-in-trade.

In the end, Kinzer is an opponent of American intervention, but too often seems to mix up ultimate and proximate causes, although, for instance, for the USA’s invasion of Iraq, which spurred Kinzer to write Overthrow, he mentioned that Bush the Second and Cheney were oil executives before occupying the White House, and mentioned it prominently, but then moved on to other issues. He is frank that the primary motivation for overthrowing foreign governments is corporate resource exploitation, but keeps it kind of faceless, except when he is writing hagiography for butchers such as Kagame. Kinzer writes critiques of American foreign policy for listeners of NPR and viewers of PBS.

As one example of many that I could provide, on page 208, Kinzer cited the American death toll of its invasion of Southeast Asia: 58,168, and his description of the native suffering was: “The Vietnamese toll was far heavier.” The native death toll in Southeast Asia was in the millions. Kinzer toted up the invader toll down to the individual, but did not even estimate the death toll of the invaded, when it was orders of magnitude higher. On the same page where he began the Vietnam discussion, he counted the bodies in Guatemala as at least 200,000, and right after his Vietnam section, he once again got precise and reported 2,796 murders in aftermath of the Pinochet coup in Chile. So, he’ll report our casualties to the man, and can get precise with small numbers of deaths that we were responsible for, but the slaughters in the millions he cannot bring himself to even estimate. Those kinds of emphases depict Kinzer’s imperial biases. Is it so that he could be published? In a mention of Kinzer, by Ed and Noam, they state that Kinzer was aware of the unsavory imperial facts, but is silent on the most damning of them. It is like the bias of historians that I write about.

I wonder how aware Kinzer is, or if he came to peace with his role, but he seems to be one of the shills that Noam refers to, as his views represent the extreme “left” of analysis and opinion, and anything to the left of that is “crazy,” so that people such as Noam, Ed, etc., are placed in the loony left, completely ignored when they are not being attacked, with their views misrepresented. Noam and Ed have always stood on that highest ethical ground of taking their in-group to task as it abuses the out-group. There are not many like them, and they are going to leave insanely large shoes to fill when they are gone. Ed is going to be 91 in April (and that Wikipedia article is a disgusting imperial broadside against Ed), and still produces an article a month for Z Magazine, and still churns out books. Incredible.

Best,

Wade

[Wade Frazier]

Hi:

As an Avalonian reminded me last night, today is my fifth anniversary of posting at Avalon. This is the best Internet run that I have had, by a long way.

I would like to make a post on a subject near and dear to me. My approach is a low risk one in ways, but high risk in others. Giving up our comforting delusions is not easy to do. Not only are we inculcated into them almost from our cradles, but they “work” in that if we adhere to them, material and egocentric rewards beckon, as we benefit from our in-group status. Almost nobody on Earth today possesses enough personal integrity today to even question their in-group ideologies. The most crazed attacks that I have received over the years were about people defending (or denying) the crimes and lies of their in-groups. Few were honest enough to admit it, so they found other reasons for their attacks, but they were irrational and thinly veiled, virtually without exception. As Orwell noted, finding a new orthodoxy to dogmatically adhere to is not an advance. We need to become fully sentient beings, in order to jettison that baggage, and it always begins in the heart.

As I continually stress, people need to have already had awakening moments before work like mine makes sense. Otherwise, people view it through the distorting prisms of their in-group ideologies, so that they really can’t comprehend my work, other than it seeming like an “attack” on their very existence. I have fielded particularly crazed responses from my “peers” – white, educated, American men – on this section of my site, for instance. For those who get past the denial and fear reactions when even hearing about free energy, I have yet to encounter a proposal to “do something” that is not one of the failed approaches that has been tried many times, even thousands of times, for some of them. Proposing those failed approaches reflects an unwillingness, inability, or inexperience in breaking out of in-group ideologies.

I often refer to Michael Road’s visit to a heavenly future Earth, and even I get new “aha” moments when reading it. The Shepherd stated this:

“Yes. Human life is an expression of consciousness…If you choose love, then love is your reality. If you do not choose love, then your conditioning will determine your reality.”


during Roads’s visit to the hellish future Earth. I did not truly appreciate the truth of that statement until many years after first reading it, as I studied for writing my big essay. The Shepherd was stating what I and my fellow travelers discovered the hard way during our journeys. When Brian got all of those crazed reactions of denial and fear, from many of the world’s leading minds, as he played the Paul Revere of Free Energy, he was encountering people who sold out their sentience for their in-group ideologies. In those instances, they were the more sophisticated ones, which deny free energy’s possibility, desirability, and deny that organized suppression even exists, which reflects their allegiance (if they were Americans, and most were) to American nationalism, capitalism, and materialism, which are the primary population control ideologies in the West, during our Fourth Epoch. In short, none of them really chose love, but chose their conditioning, and were then trapped by their choices, unable or unwilling to see past the bars of their cages, or even thought that those bars were there to protect them, not imprison them.

If somebody has not yet had their mystical awakening, what follows will not mean much, but our awareness is all that we take with us when we go. Evolving consciousness seems to be the very purpose of physical reality, and sentience is never wasted, and acts from the heart are the most powerful that we can aspire to while in physical reality. I have had dramatic confirmation of that in my own life, so I am not chattering a bunch of theory and bright ideas, but I used them in the real world and they worked.

My experiences on the high road to free energy, more than anything else, by orders of magnitude, led to my approach, not a received teaching, literature review, or empty theorizing, although I began my wild ride with some stars to steer by, and only had the truth of such wise statements confirmed during my journey, as I carried the spears of the best of the best.

I make no apologies for my writings being as challenging as they are. They are relatively formidable on the intellectual level, but not really all that much. The emotional challenge is the greatest, as it challenges people to relinquish the innumerable egocentric conceits that our societies run on. I often warn people against trying to turn their social circles onto my work and the idea of FE in general. I have had way too much experience with how that works, and have seen what my fellow travelers encountered. I structured my work so that those who are not ready for work like mine run away almost instantly. That is quite intentional on my part, as my work can make people go insane. I just heard at Christmas about somebody who was institutionalized because he encountered me, and now he openly disparages my work. The risks are very real, for those who are not awakened, with their feet firmly planted on the ground, as they failed to choose love and are subjects of their conditioning. Becoming truly sentient in a world of scarcity and fear is no easy trick. The masses are not going to begin to awaken until the means of abundance are delivered into their lives. It is just what it is, and does not good to judge the situation. We are all on the endless journey, and no part is really any better or worse than any other, although that is not easy to see from here.

But I am not going to apologize to anybody who studies my work, to help them gain a comprehensive perspective, and then complains that it was wasted effort, to break through the illusions of their conditioning. That kind of awareness, if it is truly achieved, is anchored with integrity (love) and is the most precious and powerful commodity on Earth, as achieving true sentience is the name of the game in physical reality. Those who complain have not gotten there yet.

Here is to another five good years at Avalon.

Best,

Wade

[Fiberglut]

Our awareness is all that we take with us with we go.......
A more powerful statement i don't believe I have never heard......as it does seem that physical reality boils down to that one simple fact.
I doff my cap, Wade; here's to five more years, and kicking off the fifth epoch, a place where humanity will have a true chance to evolve, instead of chasing its proverbial tail!!!

Your words are greatly appreciated,

Fiber