Jay Weidner: How Stanley Kubrick filmed the Moon Landings for NASA

[Cidersomerset]

The hoax doc could be to raise awareness with those on the web that are not fully
awake but will pick up on certain conspiracies like JFK and moon landings etc, so if
they could do the same as the alien autopsy footage and movie to dampen down
public expectations , that were raised in the 1990's by the X files and many docs
and sci - fi shows.

The alien autopsy documentary was based on possible real footage,but doctored to
make it watchable , according to Ray Santilli. So these thing are put out to muddy
the waters, it happens in other fields with 'gate keeper' hoaxers and trolls , the UFO
field have plenty and their are British intel sponsored crop circle making groups like
team 'satan' , and probably plenty more in all aspects of the alternate media.

Bart Sibrel points out several errors , the most blatant being that the Buzz Aldrin
incident mentioned in the hoax, happened several years after Stanley Kubriks
death, see below.

=========================================

Buzz Aldrin punches Bart Sibrel after being harassed by him

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=SMjD7M8v26o

Published on 8 Sep 2012

Like this video? Please Flattr it here: https://flattr.com/t/1192689

On September 9, 2002 moon landing denier Bart Sibrel followed Apollo 11
astronaut Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin out of a Hollywood hotel and relentlessly
harassed him about whether he actually landed on the moon. Buzz reacted.
Many have seen the short clip of the actual punch, but note how much verbal
confrontation preceded it. Sibrel has pulled similar stunts with many other
Apollo astronauts.

[Cidersomerset]

Article on BIN (and elsewhere) about Mars rovers being on Earth, plus videos - Devon Island in Canada (Not Greenland as one YT video mistakenly says...)

http://beforeitsnews.com/paranormal/...a-2501120.html

Thanks Kiwi

"Mars" pics are from SAME NASA STUDIO project on Devon Island

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=C9U9MrViICE

Published on 1 Oct 2015

It's a big studio on Devon Island next to Greenland. The Devon Island Research
Project is the same "MARS" SURFACE they claim are taken from Curiousity. No two
planets can have the same terrain. So how can the identical footage from the
project here on Devon Island, be the same as the ALLEGED MARS pics that they
show us! NASA busted again! "Mars" pics are from SAME project on Devon Island!

[earthdreamer]

2 books we got 5 yrs ago :


"Dark Moon: Apollo and the Whistle-Blowers Paperback" – April 2, 2001 by
Mary Bennett and David Percy

http://www.amazon.com/Dark-Moon-Whis...nett+and+Percy



You can read the beginning of the book on the amazon book image from the "Look Inside" link. This book, which helped inform the "What Happened on the Moon" video (which we look frwd to watching on the u-tube link as Netflix never had it available) convinced me that the moon landings were faked. This book is very thorough, photos, facts, science. We ordered a used copy in great condition.

Also the book "Who Built the Moon" by Christopher Knight and Alan Butler is very interesting for amazing facts about the moon.

http://www.amazon.com/Who-Built-Moon...38VH3QF8BBP8VP



Used to be that I thought only kooks questioned the moon landings. Guess I'm a kook now too.

(I was freaked out when I first heard of weird theories about the moon, looking at the moon with some distrust. But eventually, ideas get compartmentalized and whatever origins the moon may have, its force of nature is ultimately a divine source of life to be honored like air water and sunlight.)

[Cidersomerset]

"Dark Moon: Apollo and the Whistle-Blowers Paperback" – April 2, 2001 by
Mary Bennett and David Percy

David Percy & Mary Bennett, take part in this discussion from 1997 aired on UK
mainstream TV , it is a interesting discussion and they make it clear its their belief
the public front of the moon landings were hoaxed, the episodes should follow
consecutively if not click the u'tube link.

Lunar Conspiracy - Part 1 of 5

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bNrsx-7nxKI

Uploaded on 22 Jun 2008


PART TWO: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3jDqRq... David Percy & Mary Bennett,
makers of the documentary "What Happened On the Moon" with Marcus Allen & Andy
Thomas discuss the Apollo claim with Jon Ronson in 1997, in their first TV appearance.

[Cidersomerset]

The host keeps focusing on how did they keep it quite with so many people
working on it. The answer is relatively easy with compartmentalisation,
secrecy was then and even now part of our 'psyche' , 'whistleblowers'
are rare overall and in many industries and family business's , there are
plenty of practices that are not discussed in public for all sorts of reason.

Recently we have Jimmy Saville , thousands of people worked at the BBC
over his career , but not that many would of come in contact with him directly.
There were rumours for decades of what he was getting up to and many
did hear these rumours and a few may have witnessed things. Then at
various times people must have either ignored or covered up the rumours.
The point is it did not get into the media until much later after his death and
we still we do not know the extent of his crimes and who he may have been
involved with higher up in the social order and did he supply young victims for
sacrificial rituals and other disturbing allegations after it was disclosed in the
mainstreammedia he had access to mortuaries and practiced necrophilia.

So the fact 100,000's of people worked for NASA and contractors only a few
would of been involved with any hoax , and many may of indirectly helped
without being any the wiser.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Marcus Allen - moon hoax

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=6Lg7M34rnZw

Published on 23 Feb 2012

Our facebook account is http://www.facebook.com/TheMooreShow

[mojo]

NASA mentions getting through the VanAllen belt on the new Orion spacecraft so how did Apollo do it?

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=51DED8dcNkA

[Cidersomerset]

Thanks mojo...

NASA mentions getting through the VanAllen belt on the new Orion spacecraft so how did Apollo do it?

I did a thread earlier in the year...

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...542#post943542

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NASA’s Orion Engineer Admits They Can’t Get Past Van Allen Radiation Belts // " What Happened on the Moon "

He does not flat out say they cannot get past Van Allen Belts as article suggests.
But if we have been through them in the Apollo programme you would of thought
it should not be the problem he suggests. Anyway interesting subject as always...

====================================================

NASA’s Orion Engineer Admits They Can’t Get Past Van Allen Radiation Belts

Monday 16th March 2015 at 09:18 By David Icke



(VIDEO) NASA’s Orion Engineer Admits They Can’t Get Past Van Allen Radiation Belts

March 14, 2015 By 21wire 58 Comments

21st Century Wire says…



‘If this does not get the skeptics going wild on the moon debate, we don’t know what will.

In the video presentation above, NASA engineer Kelly Smith explains about many of the
risks and pitfalls surrounding the new Orion Deep Space Mission to the planet Mars.

Surprisingly, chief among Kelly’s concerns is whether or not his spacecraft can
successfully pass through the perilous Van Allen Radiation Belts. Such is the prospective
danger in fact, that NASA will have to send a dumbie craft first in order to ‘test out’
what the potential radiation effects will be on future human crews, as well as on the
ship’s delicate sensors and equipment.’

Hold on. Why the guessing game by NASA? Why don’t they just use the same 1969
technology they are said to have used on the first Apollo moon missions?

SuperPerformance72 explains, “This video released by NASA about the upcoming Orion
space exploration craft, shows a NASA scientist admitting that they still haven’t worked
out how to properly shield the spacecraft from the radiation emitted from the Van Allen belts.”

Watch:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=4O5dPsu66Kw

Read more: NASA’s Orion Engineer Admits They Can’t Get Past Van Allen Radiation Belts

http://21stcenturywire.com/2015/03/1...diation-belts/

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...542#post943542

[Atlas]

Posted by mojo (here)
NASA mentions getting through the VanAllen belt on the new Orion spacecraft so how did Apollo do it?

Dr. James Van Allen: "The recent Fox TV show, which I saw, is an ingenious and entertaining assemblage of nonsense. The claim that radiation exposure during the Apollo missions would have been fatal to the astronauts is only one example of such nonsense."

Apollo and the Van Allen Belts: an estimate of the radiation dose received
by Robert A. Braeunig

[...] Most of Apollo's radiation protection activity was directed towards providing protection against major solar flare particle events that might occur while astronauts were in the lunar module or on the lunar surface. The events, which start at the sun, were detected by ground-based instrumentation and were measured at the spacecraft by dosimeters and particle spectrometers. A prognosis of the radiation dose was prepared and continually updated by radiation environment specialists using a console in the Mission Control Center (MCC). Dose estimates were then provided for the use of the medical officer, who advised the Flight Director of the radiation effects to be expected.

[Curious77]

Haven't looked at the other thread yet, but Stanley Kubrick certainly was hanging out with interesting people.

Meanwhile, I very much agree with you that it seems to me, before the end of WWII they decided that the CIA/
deception would rule.

Cord Meyer -- two years before the end of WWII -- was drafting "Operation Mockingbird" to undermine free press
around the globe and in the US -- looks like the first concerns may have been UFO sightings which were being
seen by military pilots -- and later over Washington, DC --

but certainly, to protect the JFK coup -- and ridicule was the primary tool.

[Rex]

Posted by Cidersomerset (here)
What Happened On the Moon? - Analysis of the Lunar Photography...

I just happened to re-watch the beginning of the movie 'Interstellar' last night, and was reminded of the reference to the "faked" Apollo missions. In the story, history has been rewritten to say that the Apollo missions hadn't gone to moon, but were staged in order to force the Soviet's hand in the space race. With the goal that they would bankrupt themselves in the process - ultimately claimed as a complete success. I'm not convinced this was necessary to build the movie's main story.

[Curious77]

Thank you -- will be back soon to try to explore some of these links.

That is not to say there may be a secret space programme
using something other than rockets which has travelled much further.
And, anti-gravity, of course.

It would seem that at least Russia tried -- off the record -- to get astronauts to the moon.
Volunteers who would have faced death and evidently did.
That has come in some suggestions from their Cosmonauts who would like to see the story of those
sacrifices made known.
Possibly US also tried this method?

[Curious77]

I've never heard of "Interstellar" but very interesting comments on the story.

Nice alibi if it ever becomes necessary to admit the fake moon landing.

I have the feeling that the Soviets knew the US Moon landing never happened.

More likely, US was so far behind Russia that they needed to lie to the American public.

There was another movie which mocked the "moon landing" -- I think it was Capricorn -- Elliot Gould and a few others I don't recall -- from 1977.

Plays on YouTube now.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gJkVwyOQ5Mg

Btw, LBJ was making speeches about the moon "as the highest hill" -- of course a MIC way of thinking about things -- this was late 1950's, I think.
Long range planning to control the stage that we don't often consider.

[mojo]

That is not to say there may be a secret space programme
using something other than rockets which has travelled much further.
And, anti-gravity, of course

right on!...There is great evidence to this. If the UFO can move form a stationary to thousands of MPH they must be able to overcome G force if that is so perhaps the same method protects the craft from water pressure when submersing ie, USOs and radiation like the Van Allen belt. Ill never forget watching "fact or faked" when they visited Area 51 from a high vantage point and catching the runway lights coming on and a streak of light coming down to the runway. IMO this was proof of a secret space program not to mention all the research by Richard Dolan and others about the program. There was also some evidence on Mars especially of a supposed photo of a person cleaning the rovers solar panel.

[Cidersomerset]

Ep. 371 FADE to BLACK Jimmy Church w/ Bart Sibrel: The Apollo Hoax, LIVE on air

Interview starts aprox 30mins in...

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Xzhvtn21H9U

Published on 30 Jan 2016


Bart Sibrel, the director of 'A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon and Astronauts Gone Wild
is our guest again on F2B. First, we cover the alleged 1999 Stanley Kubrick interview that was released
last week on Dec 10th, 2015 and why it wasn't Stanley in the video...and then we fully cover the Apollo
moon landing hoax and if Bart would make 'Astronauts Gone Wild' differently...

[Jules]

This is interesting. I have been researching Jay Weidner and Stanley Kubrick just last night. I feel there is some information that is very important that I am missing. Unfortunately I am not a genius like Kubrick I humbly admit. Netflix has Eyes wide shut and the shining so I am redundantly watching hoping to get a breadcrumb from the Overlook... Jay also has good discussions on the archons and the war on the divine feminine, there also appears to be a war on the native American indians.

[Cidersomerset]

May ’15 – The Moon Landing Mysteries

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=Z8N9Mm64xC0

Published on 14 Jun 2015


A 20 minute excerpt from a New Horizons presentation with Steve Mera. We hope you enjoy it!

The fake photographs and how NASA could have pulled off the hoax of the millennium.

Over 40 years on, and the debate continues with regards NASA’s Luna landings...

Did they really land on the Luna surface the way they said they did? Why would NASA lie to the world?

Opinions are divided in regards that monumental task:
1. NASA successfully landed on the Moon and safely returned their astronauts home.
2. NASA completed their mission and were monitored by UFOs during and whilst they were on the Moon.
3. NASA have never sent man to the Moon.

But could there simply be another option...?

Could NASA have sent man to the Moon, but not using the technology they said they used, and not
at the time they said they went? Could NASA have pulled off the greatest hoax ever and if so, what
evidence is there to suggest they had the means to do so?

Steve Mera has been an investigative researcher of all things unusual for over 32 years. He presents
theories in regards how NASA could have pulled this off and leaves you to decide for yourself. We
could trust that the U.S. Government is telling the truth or... well... going off their past record...
what you thought was real, could in fact be ‘A SMOKE SCREEN’.

You decide!

Video Copyright 2015 © New Horizons, St Anne’s

For more information about this and other New Horizons presentations, please visit:

http://www.NewHorizonsStAnnes.com – and look out for the button, “DVDs of our Presentations”.

[Cidersomerset]

Surely there must be photos of the Lunar landing sites taken by Lunar orbiters
or telescopes ? I have posted some on other threads , but they could have been
placed there ? Its so annoying that this question has been let simmer for decades
as if it was all part of the plan .......




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LRO Revisits Apollo Landing Sites

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=PTeM4ZqEKR4

Published on 6 Sep 2011....NASA
NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter, LRO, has captured the sharpest images ever
taken from space of where three Apollo missions were conducted on the moon's
surface. The pictures of the Apollo 17, Apollo 14, and Apollo 12 landing sites were
taken while LRO was in what's referred to as a "dipping orbit," where the spacecraft
was roughly 15 miles above the surface. They reveal the twists and turns of the
paths made when the missions' six astronauts explored these areas.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Gorgeous Moon photos from the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter

1 March 2016 Last updated at 22:52 GMT

short vid on link....
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/magazin...ssance-orbiter

It's tempting to think we know pretty much everything about the
Moon - after all it's our nearest galactic neighbour and we landed
on it nearly half a century ago. But for the past seven years, the
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has been sending back a stream of
stunning images that have transformed our knowledge.


A selection of the million or so photographs are on display at the
National Air and Space Museum in Washington. Jane O'Brien went
to see them.

Filmed by Ian Druce. Edited by Bill McKenna.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-35702576

[Cidersomerset]

The BBC did do an article I just found in 2011




Probe pictures Moon landing sites

By Jonathan Amos
Science correspondent, BBC News
6 September 2011 From the section Science & Environment

Apollo 17 landing site

Apollo 17: The wheels of the Lunar Roving Vehicle ("Moon buggy") left parallel lines in the "soil"

Remarkable new images of the Apollo landing sites on the Moon have been released by Nasa.

The pictures clearly show the hardware left on the lunar surface by American astronauts in the
1960s and 70s, including Apollo 17's "Moon buggy". The images were acquired by the robotic
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO), which has been circling Earth's satellite since 2009.

Such shots have been returned before, but these are the best yet.

LRO has recently lowered its orbit from 50km above the Moon's surface to just 25km.
This makes it easier to see equipment, such as the descent stages that put the astronauts
on the surface. Some of the science experiments are visible, also - as are the trails of
bootmarks left in the dirt as the crews positioned these science packages.


LRV Apollo 17

Harrison Schmitt sits in the LRV

The Apollo 17, 14 and 12 sites are the focus of the latest release.

They were viewed by the narrow-angle imaging system on LRO's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter
Camera (LROC) instrument.At the lower altitude, this instrument sees objects at a resolution of
25cm by 25cm per pixel.In an extreme blow-up of the Apollo 17 Lunar Roving Vehicle (LRV), it
is just possible to discern the condition in which the astronauts Eugene Cernan and Harrison
Schmitt parked the buggy - with its wheels turned to the left.LRO has been a highly productive
mission. It has now returned several hundred thousands pictures of the lunar surface.

The probe was originally conceived as a robotic precursor to future manned missions. However,
when Nasa might return to the lunar body with astronauts is not clear. Last year, US politicians
cancelled the project, known as Constellation, that was intended to achieve this feat.

"We all like to obsess and look at the Apollo landing site images because it's fun," said Mark Robinson,
the LROC principal investigator from Arizona State University, Tempe.


LRO artist's impression

LRO was launched in 2009

"People actually used to be able to go to the Moon; people used to explore the Moon - and hopefully
sometime in the future that will continue again. But LROC is looking at the whole Moon and we've
taken about 1,500 of these high-resolution images distributed all around the Moon… and this is just
a huge resource for anybody studying the Moon, doing science; and engineers planning to go back
to the Moon in general and to specific sites."

Erosion processes on the Moon work much slower than on an active planet like Earth. Eventually,
though, all traces of the Moon landings will be erased. The lunar body is constantly bombarded
by micrometeorites that will, in time, mix up the boottracks and break down the equipment. It
has been estimated that rock at the surface erodes at a rate of about 1mm per million years.

"In human years, it may seem like forever, but in geologic terms probably there will be no traces
of the Apollo exploration in let's say 10 to 100 million years," said Dr Robinson.

On Thursday, Nasa will launch its latest Moon mission - the Gravity Recovery and Interior Laboratory (Grail).

This is a pair of satellites that will survey the Moon's gravity in unprecedented detail. The data will
reveal its internal structure, helping to explain how the lunar body formed and why its nearside now
looks so different from its farside.

Jonathan.Amos-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14813043

[Cidersomerset]

Some interesting photo and other anomalies analysed , mainly from Apollo 16 and
17 but others as well including sound.....

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Jet Wintzer, MOON HOAX NOW

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5KsH2M4m4zM

Published on 14 Jun 2015


MOON HOAX NOW a documentary film by Jet Wintzer (55 minutes)
©2015 Filminco Productions
Award winning feature and documentary filmmaker Jet Wintzer launches into the Apollo moon hoax
conspiracy with new research mined from an exhaustive exploration of the official NASA broadcasts
and public record. MOON HOAX NOW drops multiple bombshell smoking guns that forcefully prove
aspects of the record to be a fraudulent charade. The film features esoteric clips from the live TV
footage, gorgeous 16mm film reels, stunning hi def photographs and technical manuals soundtracked
to an original spaced out trancey score. The film is narrated by Jet who painstakingly dissects the
running dialogue between the astronauts and mission control paying close attention to shocking
mistakes, stressed out reactions and on the fly attempted coverups.
More than just an attack on the official story, MOON HOAX NOW is also an exciting reverent new
appraisal of the mission as one of the greatest works of conceptual art ever made. Using rare
footage, vintage Nasa promotional films and dazzling analysis, MOON HOAX NOW takes the
viewer on a voyeuristic voyage behind the vast dazzling lunar curtain.
Jet Wintzer’s awards page at IMDB http://www.imdb.com/name/nm4569683/aw...

[Cidersomerset]

The REAL confession of Stanley Kubrick

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=EAs8DK7AvHU

Published on 23 Nov 2013
Part of the documentary "Room 237" (2012) where Jay Weidner explains his theory
of the movie "The Shining" (1980) being Stanley Kubrick's confession about faking
the footage of the Apollo 11 Moon landing.