Galactic Connection Show 19th July 2016 - Simon Parkes Responds To The Community

[The Royal Wizard]

I am not discussing his excuses, I am asking about the proof for very serious allegations; "sexual predator". If thats kidding someone....

All the best

TRW

[marique3652]

Posted by Andre (here)

Posted by marique3652 (here)
I tend to pay attention to contradictions, even if small ones. I raised 11 sons and it was most important to notice "contradictions" in what they told me, because it was those contradictions (usually because my son could not keep his "story" straight) that alerted me to look into things further.................................................................

As you would probably agree in your experience with your sons, let's wait and see if these minor contradictions lead to something? Personally, I doubt there is enough there to lead to anything. But until someone puts something a bit more substantial on the table than accusations that revolve around when Simon lost confidence in this forum, I would suggest that this thread is turning into a witch hunt by people who seem to be claiming some kind of moral high ground.

If someone doesn't believe what Simon has to offer, fine, but why do so many feel the need to go out of their way to put him down and judge him so readily? Remember that Christian saying "let he who is without sin caste the first stone"?

Simon is not perfect and I don't get that he tries to pretend to be. He has done amazing work and continues to do so.

Just to clarify because I think you misinterpreted what I was trying to say, I was not finding fault with Simon, was simply pointing out that inconsistencies can sometimes indicate there is a problem so they are worth questioning in general. I was not trying to discredit anything that Simon might have shared here, just saying that one should always be aware of inconsistencies and not ignore them. I am not advocating throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Just saying that it is good to "check the temperature of the water before one submerges oneself, lest one might get burned, which applies to life and well as just bathwater."

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Sam Hunter (here)
This is why I am one step away from giving up on this community.

Sam, if you mean this community as in Avalon, know that I am one of many. Speaking for myself, please don’t compare me to those few that for whatever reason post to: charge-up, be noticed, incite, or fill in the blank(s) _________.

As for myself? If and when that day comes, I'll leave because it's time.

Thanks,
RunningDeer

Mods, you are welcome to remove.

[greybeard]

Posted by RunningDeer (here)

Posted by Sam Hunter (here)
This is why I am one step away from giving up on this community.

Sam, if you mean this community as in Avalon, know that I am one of many. Speaking for myself, please don’t compare me to those few that for whatever reason post to: charge-up, be noticed, incite, or fill in the blank(s) _________.

As for myself? If and when that day comes, I'll leave because it's time.

Thanks,
RunningDeer

Mods, you are welcome to remove.

Paula--I agree --the main body of Avalon would not even entertain this thread far less be contentious.
Its a good place to be.

Chris

[Sierra]

Posted by The Royal Wizard (here)
I am not discussing his excuses, I am asking about the proof for very serious allegations; "sexual predator". If thats kidding someone....

All the best

TRW

Right. Ask the sixty women Mr. Cosby says he did not drug and rape. Ask the ten women who stepped forward after Gretchen Carlsen, and Megyn Kelly came forward about Ailes.

I suspect, gosh I just don't know why honey, but I suspect there would never be enough "proof".

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by The Royal Wizard (here)
I am not discussing his excuses, I am asking about the proof for very serious allegations; "sexual predator". If thats kidding someone....

All the best

TRW

You've got to be kidding me. I can only conclude that it is patently obvious to you that such proof, to the standards you apparently would accept, will not be forthcoming here, for dang good reasons, and that your real intention in persisting in your "asking" is likely not an intention that most of the rest of us would support.

[Bluegreen]

... (deleted) ...

[Alberto e Daniela]

We came to know about the accusations of sexual "visits" received by women after consulting with Simon, when we were part of the Connecting Consciousness Facebook group (*).

One day a member of the group revealed he had heard the same story over and over from several women of the C.C. group, and he could no longer believe this was a coincidence. Despite formerly being, like most of us there, a supporter of Simon's, this person clearly stated his opinion that there was a sexual abuse scheme going on. Simon rejected such allegations and showed being offended.

Back then, he did not even mention the possibility of being used by some entity
[ NOTE - how can we trust his ability to see inside us, if he clearly could not see inside himself ? ]

When visiting personally this member of the group, we met his partner, who is one of those women, and confirmed receiving the unwanted visit after a skype session with Simon.

Graybeard reminded us that Simon regularly receives a "Health Check" from his Mantid family or group. This adds another inconsistency, because such a (supposedly) advanced race (technologically and psychically) never told him he had a huge reptile attached, who was using him as a puppet.


(*) Note: Connecting Consciousness was a private fb group set up by Simon, where he invited those who had had skype sessions with him. Lately this group was disbanded by Simon, but most members have been invited to a similar group, run by his aide Fran.

[Chester]

Posted by RunningDeer (here)

Posted by Sam Hunter (here)
This is why I am one step away from giving up on this community.

Sam, if you mean this community as in Avalon, know that I am one of many. Speaking for myself, please don’t compare me to those few that for whatever reason post to: charge-up, be noticed, incite, or fill in the blank(s) _________.

As for myself? If and when that day comes, I'll leave because it's time.

Thanks,
RunningDeer

Mods, you are welcome to remove.

Thanks for the direct question, Running Deer -

No - not Avalon... the alternative community is what I referenced and I should have been better about what I meant and specific. I have noticed an uncomfortable trend across much of the alternative community where they "love/light" over clearly unacceptable behavior. Where anyone who raises concerns (so that some among the vulnerable might avoid what they would prefer to avoid) is attacked when that information comes from multiple, credible sources who have track records of reason and sound mindedness. Where those with fantastical stories too often are raised to rock star status where those who have had real experiences and most importantly very sound and well considered reflections on those experiences are largely ignored. Don't think I am not also pointing the finger at myself albeit earlier in my experiences in this community. I just wish the community as a whole would mature such that real, truthful information might be featured and where thoughtful and well balanced considerations about other worldly experiences are expressed and discussed and where the vulnerable are less exploited. Sadly probably just wishful thinking on my part.

The asking for proof at this point is best responded to by suggesting the individual do their own research and then make acquaintances with those they can discern have reasonably sound mind and judgment and then they will probably get up to speed.

If anything, that Avalon is allowing careful discussion of the matter (me being probably one of the riskier ones and so I am doing my best not to go to far) says a great deal about Avalon (and I mean that in a positive way).

In fact, I will soon be making a post on my blog which I am certain will not be liked by many folks out there but I predict none of those who will take exception to my upcoming post will be members of Avalon.

[Alberto e Daniela]

After watching the interview where Simon addresses this "Anu" or "Dad" issue with Alexandra Meadors, some interesting comments are in order:

- Whan Fran tells him about receiving a visit of someone posing as Simon, he says that in order to do that, someone should have an energetic connection, or his DNA, and this triggered his Eureka moment; but when several people reported being visited by him at night, he dismissed that as "someone posing as him". Such incoherence certainly deserves being pondered.

- Alexandra does not ask the necessary questions, which most victims of "Anu's mischiefs" would like to see asked and answered.

First of all we wonder how anyone could accept Simon's very vague description of what was done to the people who trusted him for a session.
His mild words to describe what the "attacks" perpetrated by his Dad actually did to the victims, are like "upset, disturbed or something else".

Hey, a powerful negative entity has been acting through him for years on his "patients", and neither Simon nor Alexandra take a minute to inquire about:

1) which techniques his "Dad" has used onto the subjects that Simon was counseling
2) which consequences this has left inside of them
3) why did he never do a full scan of himself before working on others?

There is plenty of praise for Simon, but nobody defends the interests of the weak, who have been abused.

Is this to be considered a fair interview?

Another question is a must, since both Alexandra and Simon mention a raising in consciousness happening on Earth: what level of self awareness Simon believes he has, which let him act under a massive and harmful alien control, while claiming to be able to help others get rid of that same problem he would not see in himself?

After all the manipulations that he has suffered since childhood, and we feel for him, the list of such tragic discoveries could go on and on.

[Sean]

Posted by Alberto e Daniela (here)
We came to know about the accusations of sexual "visits" received by women after consulting with Simon, when we were part of the Connecting Consciousness Facebook group (*).

One day a member of the group revealed he had heard the same story over and over from several women of the C.C. group, and he could no longer believe this was a coincidence. Despite formerly being, like most of us there, a supporter of Simon's, this person clearly stated his opinion that there was a sexual abuse scheme going on. Simon rejected such allegations and showed being offended.

Back then, he did not even mention the possibility of being used by some entity
[ NOTE - how can we trust his ability to see inside us, if he clearly could not see inside himself ? ]

When visiting personally this member of the group, we met his partner, who is one of those women, and confirmed receiving the unwanted visit after a skype session with Simon.

Graybeard reminded us that Simon regularly receives a "Health Check" from his Mantid family or group. This adds another inconsistency, because such a (supposedly) advanced race (technologically and psychically) never told him he had a huge reptile attached, who was using him as a puppet.


(*) Note: Connecting Consciousness was a private fb group set up by Simon, where he invited those who had had skype sessions with him. Lately this group was disbanded by Simon, but most members have been invited to a similar group, run by his aide Fran.

The bolded bit blows Simon out of the water.

I'm fairly certain "being controlled by a hostile alien intelligence who wants to make his "host" sexually assault people qualifies as a "health issue" to the Mantids

C'mon guys. This is just another "Shane"-type deal. I've said it before: We are ALL capable of the things Simon "claims" he can do. Stop looking for Superman. Save yourself.

[greybeard]

In the interest of accuracy I did not say that "Graybeard reminded us that Simon regularly receives a "Health Check" from his Mantid family or group."

It is is in the newspaper article that I posted which reminded Alberto and his partner as per the bit highlighted in Working actors post

Link to what I posted here

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1083685

[Andre]

Posted by Agape (here)

Workingactor, would you be so kind as to provide the source of your information that Simon is a sexual predator who exploited gullible women by his own admission, etc. I'm not sure that anyone has provided these links. Many thanks.

Andre: it's not been discussed in explicit manner but it's been responded to .. Bills reply to you on previous page and quote from Simons website ... and Simon himself explains his idea about what's really happened in the interview with Alexandra (OP). There's ( fortunately ) no 'source material' of that kind in existence , so far it's 'stories' ( aka private testimonies of several experiencers who happened to be mistreated - in their own words - through consulting with him ).

Thanks for you reply Agape as I am trying to find-out if this thread was anything more than a witch hunt.

You refer me to Bill's reply but that makes no reference to Simon being a sexual predator and nor does Simon's website.

If, as you say, the subject of Simon's so-called "sexual predator" behavior has not been "discussed in an explicit manner" and there is "no source material" then where have these toxic accusations come from?????

You refer to "private testimonies of several experiencers who have been mistreated". May I inquire where are these "private testimonies" that you have read other than Alberta and Daniela who make no mention of sexual behavior?

Many thanks.

[Andre]

Posted by greybeard (here)
I have not investigated except his [Simon's] advice not to go into the light after the death of the body--that is totally "alien" to all that I have read--studied for over thirty years. Chris

Hi again Chris. I also recall Simon talking about this but my interpretation of what Simon is trying to say is a bit different to your's. I believe he is suggesting not to follow the light in the tunnel that so many encounter in near death experiences (the ones that are sent back to complete unfinished business). There are many different forms of Light in higher dimensions, and I think Simon is merely suggesting that we try to discern which Light we gravitate towards and which Light we follow. It makes sense to me that 4th dimensional/astral entities with ulterior motives would endeavor to trap human souls when they leave their bodies, so I have taken Simon's warning in that context.

[greybeard]

Not wishing to labor a point but the soul can not be captured according to all that I have learned over many years single minded study of the path tp enlightenment.

Best wishes
Chris

[Agape]

Posted by greybeard (here)
Not wishing to labor a point but the soul can not be captured according to all that I have learned over many years single minded study of the path tp enlightenment.

Best wishes
Chris

Chris ( good morning to you ), neither I wish to .. but with respect to you and the advaita ( non-duality ) teachings ,
there's also 'nothing to be discussed here' . I know you understand.

But those most precious teachings are intended for people capable of such mighty understanding beyond-understanding ,
they can not withstand any argument in debate .

Soul 'can not be captured' but it can becomes seriously deluded . It's merely a matter of terms .

Not all are set on the path to knowledge as their main task and direction , they don't make such awareness the measure of their own path .

Non-duality is deep and mysterious and beyond everything .

But it can't stand the argument people pose and live as 'human life'.

You know

[Andre]

Posted by greybeard (here)
Not wishing to labor a point but the soul cannot be captured according to all that I have learned over many years single minded study of the path to enlightenment. Best wishes, Chris

Sorry. Bad use of the word "soul" in my post. I agree. The soul cannot be captured. I should have been more accurate and used the word "dis-incarnate human" or perhaps the "astral body".

[Agape]

Posted by Andre (here)
If, as you say, the subject of Simon's so-called "sexual predator" behavior has not been "discussed in an explicit manner" and there is "no source material" then where have these toxic accusations come from?????

You refer to "private testimonies of several experiencers who have been mistreated". May I inquire where are these "private testimonies" that you have read other than Alberta and Daniela who make no mention of sexual behavior?

Many thanks.

I've seen few and read few over the years, there are snippets of them in some peoples private 'experiencer' type videos on youtube ,

Daniella and Alberto are merely two people who rose the alarms - naturally - and came to complain to Bill Ryan.

I strongly disagree with much what's been going on in past decade around this subject in broad terms and for me personally ,

I chose the path of truth and love and learning in life . And I happened to be so privileged to have quite few ET contact experiences during my life ,
my testimony was also recorded for the PA/PC Project .
Though , I feel like total odd ball not only here , just anywhere I go , for not willing to step down to the level where other 'experiencers' go and start 'telling fancy stories' .

From my side of overview and larger perspective that is based both on many worthy philosophical teachings and years of practice AND personal experience of 'communion' , communication through the ET contact,
ET contact is rare , it's completely distinguishable from everything else - the whole array of human psychic experiences , 99,99% of what people attribute to ET contact 'experiences' are in fact psychic /spiritual experiences
that fall under one or another category but are all 'mighty human'.

Like Chris said , I'm not going to earn another brownie point for saying so repeatedly and I have warned people about this since 10 years ago when I came out with my data and on to internet .


From social and spiritual point of view , telling people worldwide that you consider yourself someone very special is very risky avenue and literally selling your 'soul' to the mass trends , is what Simon did.

As workingactor said well, we all are capable of the same thing , good and bad. Each person have their depths they seldom share , they could create their own religion if they wanted to , they could claim themselves the only child of God ( their name ) and the descended Master . Because this is who human kind is and well meant to be.
Simon is but one Being on his path , living his story .

Right from the days back when this forum was still supporting his claims and the discussion went on .. I found very difficult to comment.

For me the debate about ETs is fine with people who are genuine enough, subtle and gentle enough , intelligent enough to be able to hold the energy levels ,
there 'talking or not' , all has some albeit limited meaning .

Give the information to 3D humans and they'll drag the energy down to their level of gross experiences, desire , anger , ignorance.
They'll get nightmares of monsters and sex with aliens .

I have said so repeatedly and in previous thread as well though couple of my posts happened to be deleted that I disagree with turning ET contact to gnostic teachings and vice versa.


.

If I did not explain myself explicitly enough : I don't think/see/agree that any ET entity ( Simons ET Dad ) are responsible for peoples psychic experiences .
It may be or may not be but from what I know, those Beings are too subtle to go this low . They're not around 'in scout ships' ( though some 'contactees' seem to allude to it ) to visit your clients and friends frequently .

Anyone can do this, predator spirit who are member of his group or even distantly related . It's not easy to find out and 'source' the energy/entity and get rid of them but ultimately, you probably could - if you worked together and had that knowledge.

It would be easier to invite unbiased 'shaman' from another unrelated spiritual circle working through other methods , someone who is strictly speaking , not biased towards or against Simon or anyone in the group ,
so it can't be Bill Ryan or me or anyone even distantly related to this collective because we all have had our 'share' here ,
and help to get rid of the trouble.

If you can't do that and trying to resolve issues from 'within the group' it's as Andre said , not more than witch hunt and claims of experience against claims.


The best I could come up with on Sunday ,

[Andre]

Posted by Sierra (here)

Posted by The Royal Wizard (here)
I am not discussing his excuses, I am asking about the proof for very serious allegations; "sexual predator". If that's kidding someone....All the bestTRW

Right. Ask the sixty women Mr. Cosby says he did not drug and rape. Ask the ten women who stepped forward after Gretchen Carlsen, and Megyn Kelly came forward about Ailes. I suspect, gosh I just don't know why honey, but I suspect there would never be enough "proof".

I'm with The Royal Wizard, I have studied this thread over and over and the level of the toxic accusations against Simon are totally disproportionate to the facts that have so far been presented. I'm not saying Simon is innocent, but you and several others have found him guilty based on very little hard core evidence. And does this Ailes have anything to do with Simon? It is very unclear to me why they are relevant?

[araucaria]

The term ‘witch-hunt’ describes one negative way in which the community deals with its psychiatric and/or criminal fringe of ‘deviant’ individuals. It is negative because instead of restricting the fringe, it helps it to become mainstream, by producing many false positives notably among the creative fringe, who are exploring some advanced area ahead of the rest. If there is any type of witch-hunt going on, then some of the hunted would appear to be... among the hunters.

Disclaimer: the following are the comment of a concerned but unqualified poster. The issue here indeed is whether anyone at all is qualified to speak on certain matters. There are two sorts of somewhat qualified professions who would need consulting, in mental health and the legal system. But they are never involved until a mental health case or crime is reported to them. And when this does happen, they are not fully qualified to handle certain cases. Since both professions are called upon to respond to the causes of disruption to social harmony, the current state of human society is indication enough that they are underperforming, both through too many undetected cases and underqualification to deal with what comes to them – which are basically two ways of saying the same thing: too much is passing under the radar.

One area of underqualification is the ET picture of old souls having an experience as (initially) young humans. The soul contract is in contradiction with the mainstream view of a child having an immature brain/mind. For the first time Simon Parkes has admitted that from the age of 3 something started happening to him to which he did not consent. From a human mental health and legal standpoint, at barely half the age of reason, he could not consent to anything; in fact he could not do so until much later when he reached the legal age of consent. Sometimes, a 15-year-old girl will seem to run off consentingly with an older man. Her consent counts for nothing, and there is a legal case to be answered. The soul contract is one very handy way for getting round the law undetected.

However, it is even easier to cause trouble by bypassing even more stringent mental health recommendations. It is not illegal for a parent to walk out on their family, even though broken families do not provide the ideal start in life for any child. Note how Simon was fatherless, and practically motherless as well even before his mother was murdered. Worse still, the male presence in the household was provided by secret service agents. These may be government personnel, but they don’t even need to ‘get round the law’: they are above the law. I am sure a psychiatrist (but none has been consulted) would have plenty to say about a young child’s unusual experiences of ‘Mummy’ and Daddy’, filling the blanks with entities from elsewhere, and would take a very dim view of the associated soul contract fine print. He would also very much categorize this person as a patient, and definitely not a colleague. As it happens, psychiatry has its own category of whistle-blowers, dissatisfied ‘service users’, ‘consumers’, ‘survivors’ – they have several names for themselves – who organize themselves in advocacy groups that are an extremely helpful part of the mental health care system. But they do not claim to supplant the professional or copy the professional’s relationship with a client/patient. That would make no sense, for if, instead of alleviating a problem, psychiatry is just another process that has to be survived, you cannot change that by continuing with provenly inadequate techniques. We are groping for fresh approaches, and these groups offer more evidence that group interaction with fellow-sufferers empathizing can often do more good than an asymmetrical one-on-one sufferer-curer relationship.

Since a forum such as Avalon operates on the lines of an advocacy group, another handy way these days to disrupt social harmony is irresponsible (or simply careless or insufficiently informed) talk on the Internet, especially when aimed at such sites. So Agape’s remark may very well be true:

It's especially done through forums who collect people like those 'moth flying to light' ( as Carmody said another place ). https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1083596

However, in the case of Simon it comes fifty years too late to explain how we arrived at this point. The irresponsible talk back then was coming from those secret service agents, both through their presence and in particular by allowing a small boy to explore secret German UFO documents, which has got to be child abuse by any standards. The end result is the same whether it was just opportunistic or careless (pointless) child abuse (MI5/6 careless??), or grooming with an eye to later exploitation, i.e. now, when Simon, a third-generation asset at least, has come out as an ET whistle-blower. In such circumstances, how this material has been processed is far too doubtful to serve as evidence of anything.

The fact that needs to be taken into account in the two sides to Simon Parkes is that there are two kinds of mental health sufferers: on the one hand you have the bona fide type (hopefully the vast majority) accepting they have a problem and in order to overcome it and relieve their symptoms cooperating with carers, which includes possibly objecting to their cruder methods. But on the other hand, that reaction is already a form of mental healthiness; others may be beyond this and actually actively undermining the process. Full-blown mental illness would respond to treatment in this negative way, making it virtually incurable. The same situation is clearer in regard to crime: most crime is done by people straying outside of the law somewhat inadvertently, but you also find hardened criminals who know very well what they are about – and may even join the police to divert attention.

Again, we basically have two ways of saying the same thing: crime and mental illness both cause social disharmony; in their extreme forms, both try to keep one step ahead in being undetectable, if detected unreportable, and if reported downplayable, i.e. guilty but not responsible; e.g. bona fide – just doing one’s best; or mental illness as an excuse for crime; or victimhood – having been abused as a mitigating circumstance of abuse – X made me do it, ISIS made me do it. With no claim to originality, I would suggest that the ET phenomenon is today an important part of that arsenal of escaping personal responsibility. It is not of course the only part of that arsenal, and I hasten to add, nor is it the only part of the ET phenomenon. I am not saying that benevolent ETs do not exist. However, they would have no part in the issue of non-humanity as the ultimate excuse for inhumanity; on the contrary, they would be on the side of humanity, and very possibly greater humanity than we generally find on this planet. To find such benevolent ET presence, the best place to look is not the testimony of Simon Parkes, mostly recounting the nightmares/ravings of a mentally abused immature mind. My point is that you don’t need to go off-planet to find this type of cultural clash: it can be found within a single terrestrial human individual. See this post describing the case of a woman in Europe of African descent where both a court of law and its psychiatric reports are seen to be floundering to explain how she came to kill her child.