Galactic Connection Show 19th July 2016 - Simon Parkes Responds To The Community

[Agape]

Excellent post Araucaria , I think that those who read your post above and are willing to give a second thought to whatever has been discussed and alluded to in past by Simon himself get a chance to realise how very complicated if not impossible cases like this turn up once 'fallen' to the diverse and dispersed continuum of human psychoanalysis.

Something I'd like to add here on side note : in my life long experience and I'm merely being honest here,
the ET contact 'experience' is easy to 'read' either with children or adults who are not mental health sufferers at the same time .

It does not mean that you may be prone to psychic discomfort or disorder in other time of your life or struggle with psychic experiences of human category the next year or 10 years later , or never , the link between the two would be too complicated to outline here but it's a human link mostly .

The reason why I say so is that while during ET contact , the very pinnacle of your intellectual, exploratory and emotional capacity is utilised which in itself requires at least 3 mental factors to work in unison ,
that is you need to be undisturbed ( mentally ) , open - whether it's called unbiased or fearless towards the experience and , able to function on your personal 'top level' at that time so that some kind of clear processing and memory retention could happen to you towards 'what' had you experienced ,

if you're experiencing serious breakdown at the same time , it's not impossible but it's quite improbable that you'd recall anything or be able to communicate to intelligences beyond human capacity etc.

It does happen of course and partial - if not full - reason for the mayhem prevalent among the ET contact 'experiencers' community that people , and older they're in our type of cultures, more worried and more conditioned they sometimes become , more cautious towards any kind of 'new contact' in general ( think of old people and how they don't want to meet new people anymore ) ,
it's almost rare that people would not experience 'mental fog' or carry few levels of their disturbed human psyche to the 'ET encounter' if such occurs and the result can be whole mixture of things,

amnesia of the event is most common, followed by many categories of mixed dream scenarios , snippets of impressions and so on.

Strangely enough, I don't think that regressions and digging to what's really happened help a lot because ad a/ most regression therapists/sessions don't or even can't go straight to the point , they instead keep accessing one or another layer of your psyche , each with different 'experiencer paradigm',
ad b/ offering more information to individuals and collective who are already bathing in breakdowns and paradigms tends to just 'add to the mess'.

Ad c/ there are no definitive answers any worldly authority is going to provide to you ,
big caveat.
For those who DO remember their ET contact or piece of clearly enough, you then knew how unique that was and knew no one in the human world will have better answers about ETs.
A biologist may claim to know 'all' about ants , it's still the ants who understand themselves best .
Moreover , advanced ET civilisation are not 'an ant' of my example and they don't wait and sit somewhere to be dissected by you , your milabs, your university departments whom some expect to have 'full data'. No, they don't.

So this is one price you are inevitably going to pay for the rest of your life for this 'boon'.
While you may meet few others with 'similar experience' , no one with 'yours' and many people with opinion on the matter including some well meant individuals and some not-so-well-meant individuals ,
there are aspects of the problematics we are bound NOT to understand for the rest of our natural human life times.

Anything beyond the research category is , in my humble opinion, going to end up in debacle or controversy at the end ..

[Agape]

Quoting Araucaria :

One area of underqualification is the ET picture of old souls having an experience as (initially) young humans. The soul contract is in contradiction with the mainstream view of a child having an immature brain/mind. For the first time Simon Parkes has admitted that from the age of 3 something started happening to him to which he did not consent. From a human mental health and legal standpoint, at barely half the age of reason, he could not consent to anything; in fact he could not do so until much later when he reached the legal age of consent. Sometimes, a 15-year-old girl will seem to run off consentingly with an older man. Her consent counts for nothing, and there is a legal case to be answered. The soul contract is one very handy way for getting round the law undetected.

This point itself is debatable , depending on circumstances of both individual and social development and maturity and there's possibly no legal or health care system that can successfully answer the question of 'how mature you were in that age to take such&such decision'.

Civilised human groups and societies tend to adopt set of laws that best fit and correspond - even approximately- to their social dynamics and psychological and physiognomical development of its members .

Practically and under circumstances , it does not exist 'the same way' .


I won't go to lengthy deliberations here as I fear people still do not respect my input a lot,
yes I fear stupid human beings -
and blame me mentally for whatever to which I'm sensitive and it's something I don't do to others so why should I deserve it from some troll sitting on the other side of the globe who know nothing about me , I don't .




Back to the topic. Under critical circumstances, wars for example , children as young as 5 or 6 years of age - that's hardly an age of 'maturity' or 'legal consent' were seen to be able to take up critical and sometimes selfless decisions,
in order to save their or others lives .
Conscience develops in children in various capacity in tiny age, some do experience themselves as 'being born with it' , others don't and experience it as something 'taught' and imposed upon them .

So whether Simon gave a 'consent' to his early age experience depends in my opinion on whether it was benevolent or malevolent type of experience /encounter .
It's all that pays with very young person usually because your body is too tiny and your human 'personality' almost non-existent and while you may have powerful brain/mind,
what really plays life role is the difference between good/bad and pleasure/pain. I'd object to disqualifying small kids automatically from the capacity of 'pure discernment' .
In many ancient cultures the elders chose small kids exactly for their pure capacity of discernment to resolve difficult questions, intuitively , not saying it's the way and probably far from your culture norm as we can get but such children do exist.

What the toddler inevitably misses - in any such parallel - is complicated thinking, critical thinking and long term vision .

Can tell you small and solid example from my own life .

My mum who was diabetic since I was 2 and half year old needed some level of supervision in case she would fall to either hypo- or hyperglycaemia ,
her and father both had backgrounds in medicine so there were no major fears but everyone had to be informed and ready to help , so was I , from when I was 4 or so .
I was also much oriented towards medicine and science ( shifted from wanting to be a veterinary towards human medicine ) , read my first anatomy book when I was 6.
After my parents divorced which was kind-of tragedy for the family I had and left mum helpless , I knew I had to look after her because the 'big guy' was selfish enough to leave. Mum suffered nervous breakdown , for couple of years that no one attended to in fact than I did ,
talking through it with her for evenings , she cried a lot .. one of her 'emotional threats' towards me was 'you are like dad , you'll get married and run away soon as you can' . It was threat, mum did turn abusive over the next couple of years, very emotional and hard to deal with .
I said 'no mum, you know I will take care of you for you till the end of your life , i will never get married' . I said that when I was 7.
Later, there were times , many times that I hoped I didn't . But I did and the point was critical enough, strong enough to make me follow the timeline .
I felt guilty and responsible for what father did and as anyone with conscience would realise, leaving a sick and vulnerable person alone to tend for themselves , with kid in care is sort-of a crime.
If I said a word , the legal services would take me away from her , put me to home or fathers care who had all the money and things that generally attract kids.
I won't tell you all the story now .. not my thread topic ( again ) but yes , we are sometimes capable of decisions that may not be fully mature decisions and change all .

[araucaria]

Thank you Agape. Just one small comment however: when you say

Posted by Agape (here)
A biologist may claim to know 'all' about ants , it's still the ants who understand themselves best .
Moreover , advanced ET civilisation are not 'an ant' of my example and they don't wait and sit somewhere to be dissected by you , your milabs, your university departments whom some expect to have 'full data'.

I think many, from a human standpoint, would say you have totally reversed the emphasis there. From their point of view, it is more germane and urgent to dispel fears of themselves being the ants under the biological microscope of ETs. Everything from sample collection, seed banks, cattle mutilation, human abduction and experiments to channelled wisdom from ET sources suggests that the balance of power through knowledge is weighted very heavily the other way. It does seem as though a tiny anthill Earth has been trodden on, whether inadvertently or otherwise, by some large ET boot, demonstrating, as you say a large dose of ignorance amid the study and partial knowledge and pseudo-superiority.

So, while I don’t think there is any danger any time soon of humans thinking they know all about ET, the opposite might not be true, or at any rate might not be perceived to be true. What needs to be established is a bit of balance between any two different species – synergy as opposed to parasitism of one sort or another. Between humans and cats, no one (except perhaps your biologist) knows or cares who’s in charge (many say it’s the cats): we happily cohabit and follow our different agendas which diverge and converge in various ways. When painful baggage is collected or released, we don’t necessarily diverge or converge any more or less, we are simply more or less comfortable together. For example, my daughter’s new cat was abandoned then kept for a year in a room with 20 other felines. When my daughter took her home, she was very scared and shy, but eventually, with an open door and the freedom of the planet, she evolved into a happy and grateful cat, doing if anything more catlike things and as well as more humanlike things such as enjoying the sights and smells of nature or a comfortable sofa.

Dogs are rather different; they only seem to thrive when they have a master able to train them. That is another form of synergy; a dog can live with a cat owner, but only if it is not treated like a cat. I guess any two species can sniff around each other for a while and come to some kind of working arrangement, if they can avoid being scary (with or without predation) and being scared. So yes, an ant knows best what it is to be an ant, but it gains that self-knowledge partly from contact with non-ants – which means it can evolve. For ant, read human; then for human, read ET.

[Agape]

I think many, from a human standpoint, would say you have totally reversed the emphasis there. From their point of view, it is more germane and urgent to dispel fears of themselves being the ants under the biological microscope of ETs. Everything from sample collection, seed banks, cattle mutilation, human abduction and experiments to channelled wisdom from ET sources suggests that the balance of power through knowledge is weighted very heavily the other way. It does seem as though a tiny anthill Earth has been trodden on, whether inadvertently or otherwise, by some large ET boot, demonstrating, as you say a large dose of ignorance amid the study and partial knowledge and pseudo-superiority.

Well, ( thank you Araucaria for the expansion of your thought here ),

I don't think I have , actually reversed an existing and frequently quoted emphasis on our human situation 'down here' which is more than obviously ,
far more similar to a situation of large anthill - tempting possible space explorer to step in and sample ( with gloves and masks , I suggest ) - than it may ever be otherwise in the humanly predictable future ,

and even then the parallel remains gross and incomplete , the one with the life of fruit flies I attempted in another thread not so long ago was far more fitting ,

Hybrid humans and their blood type

If you're human biologist and test whether some kind of immunity response develops in fruit flies or not , the way you do it is by watching few tens of generations of them carrying the same gene and whether the 'factor' you've challenged is preserved, becomes dominant or recessive and what kind of consequences does it produce , over generations.
From the drosophila view point , he/she the fruit fly have no idea or way to find out even . They live few days is 'whole life' .

If the same is true for this accelerated human evolution and with life spans we currently enjoy
while being watched by some million years old advanced space civilisations

the chances that we find out and will be able to speak-to-them in human physical bodies are low - from this particular biological perspective - unless we can perhaps, live much longer )

and that's not the end of the metaphor of course but sums it up for me somewhat better .

So of course you're right about the 'emphasis reversal' that's hardly my creation, it was produced by many peoples claims about their governments and military 'in the know' and in possession of all from EBEs to ET technologies ,

and some of their statements could allude to the idea that there's a human or a superman on the planet who knows about 'everything' ,

I see curved logic behind that timeline of statements , logic that directly or not supports conflicts, building up of strategic war arsenals , threatening the other parties with 'we have much more in our pockets than you'd dream of' ,
then the other claiming or alluding to the same so there we're again,

the beginning of 21st century and someones dirty war, political and espionage games that grew over everyones head
so they do not hesitate to use the 'disclosure movement' and people of their own country to press the government down to 'give in' the secrets they perhaps,
even do not have ;

I mean well, probably they do but really not the way people are imagining it

and they hope the other people in other countries to do the same and creating a Troy horse, a monster , to trick people into believing something that is usable ,
and misusable

and guess what ?

The amount of real and realistic information that is actually ET sourced and could be verified actually exists but is minute and due to the presence of this monster-war machine ,
people who are professionals, scientists and generally those better equipped to investigate are fearing this monster more than anything,
more than any 'E.T.' since this humanly composited monster was seen to be responsible for the worst massacres and damage done to the human culture in past ..

like a group of crickets descending on a field ( or something like that ).

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Andre (here)
I'm not saying Simon is innocent, but you and several others have found him guilty based on very little hard core evidence.

Some have found Simon guilty, based on evidence not fully presented here. Neither you nor The Royal Wizard know entirely on what evidence they based their determination. We've not been told all that evidence here, and likely we won't be.

In other words, I would suggest it would be more accurate if you had written:

I'm not saying Simon is innocent, but you and several others have found him guilty, without presenting sufficient evidence on this tread to enable me to reach the same conclusion.

Fine - it's your choice what to think of this.

If I were sitting on a jury hearing a case against Simon on these matters, and no more evidence was presented to me than what has been posted here, I'd probably vote "Not Guilty", for I would likely find that the case has not been proven, by just the evidence posted here, beyond the legal meaning of "a reasonable doubt."

We are not however a legal sitting jury. We have no such standing, authority, jurisdiction or powers. Rather, some of those posting on this thread, or whose private comments are summarized by others posting on this thread are, from what I can tell, intending to serve a socially valuable function of alerting others to a potential risk.

In part as a result of this thread, Simon has recently said of himself:

And what I worked out was that when I was between the ages of three years old and six years old, the entity that I refer to as dad, thats the white draconus Annu, put some sort of energy hook, thats the best way I can describe it, the auric field of my body. And he was using that not solely go to visit women but also men as well to either try to sexually excite them or frighten them or what ever agenda he had.

Those words reaffirm to me the value of this thread. My thanks go out to those who have come forth to raise their concerns and raise a note of caution to others.

Furthermore, I share a concern better expressed by others that just saying (my paraphrasing):

that wasn't me, rather it was an entity that I have now rejected from my life, so all is well now, and besides you really can't hold me responsible for "what ever" happened before

... just saying that doesn't cut the mustard in my book.

Both (1) Simon's responsibility for whatever might be his prior actions, and (2) the appropriate cautions to those engaging in the future with Simon in such potentially harmful endeavors, remain.

[araucaria]

Posted by Agape (here)
I said 'no mum, you know I will take care of you for you till the end of your life , i will never get married' . I said that when I was 7.
Later, there were times , many times that I hoped I didn't . But I did and the point was critical [...]
I won't tell you all the story now .. not my thread topic ( again ) but yes , we are sometimes capable of decisions that may not be fully mature decisions and change all .

If we stay on the subject of childhood, we do not stray off-topic, as Simon’s childhood is critical to who and what he has become. At the same time, we move into general territory that is hugely more important than the single case of any one individual. So, far from straying off-topic, we are exploring the topicality of Simon Parkes in the broader scheme of things.

The big issue, in my view, is that we take children as being dependent (the legal term), and adults by implication as independent. Raising children therefore involves giving them as much independence as possible as early as possible. When this process breaks down, you have dysfunctional families of dependent children becoming dependent adults and the whole thing becomes a nightmare. There has been a great deal said about the dysfunctional family, of which royalty and other elites are the most egregious example. If you are born to rule, then that is actually, and paradoxically, the ultimate straitjacket: your life is more or less set in stone before you are born; your family, the nation, the whole world depends upon you fulfilling your destiny. You are infinitely less free than the lowliest of your subjects. That’s what needs to be changed.

Basically we are raising kittens as if they were puppies. The problem is that dogs cannot raise puppies to be like dogs: they end up reverting to being like wolves. At first they will look for their master, or another master. When they find none their predatory instincts previously held in check take over again, and maybe turn on the sheep they used to guard. Man has gone through several masters, the gods, God, now ET for some; perhaps he is beginning to understand that he is on his own (but not alone).

If this change is going to happen, we need to look at the closer-to-ideal situation where independent adults raise children to be independent. Independence for a child includes the irresponsibility of living in a fantasy world where nothing is for real and any decisions are reversible. He has the time to think things through. When you arrive from a relatively timeless place you have to learn that time is on your side, it does not have to be your enemy. Here is an example to show how a child can get ahead of himself. When he was small, my son used to say at night, ‘I don’t want to go to school’, and I’d say, ‘That’s great, because there’s no school right now; it’s time for bed!’ Then he wanted to be a car mechanic, because he wouldn’t have to wash his hands. Since he ended up a surgeon, washing his hands at all hours of the day and night, I tend to think he was getting ahead of himself again; by the time he was washing his hands, it was no longer an issue, because human vehicle maintenance had the advantage of running his brain through the gears as well. So his original childish idea was not wrong; it had simply grown so much bigger. And it did so in a secret place undisturbed by any outside, especially parental influence. All in his own good time and left to his own devices: when the time came to choose a direction, he made his unexpected choice unprompted.

So independence means presence without interference. Simon Parkes’s childhood seems to have been the exact opposite: a web of dependence with minimal outside presence and maximum interference; interference notably with respect to time: not just exposure to things beyond his years, but exposure to nonhuman concepts of time. Time is planet-based, meaning that you learn to adjust to the planet in order to lead a life of harmony right here and now, or you try to impose your exotic settings and expect the planet and its inhabitants to adjust: they won’t. If Earth time is constant, the perception of it accelerates from childhood to old age; in other words we are experiencing the exact opposite of your fruit fly aspiring to become an ‘advanced’ biologist since a human life is one of devolution from near-eternal being to ephemeron. Life is slow when you have a whole lifetime ahead of you (and when paradoxically you are growing/changing fastest), but extremely fleeting by the time you only have a day more to live (and set in your ways, often to the point of total sclerosis). Hence if we are to see the human experience as a valid one – and of course it is as valid as any other – then we have to be able to reverse our logic. In other words, while aspiring to the stars and to become higher beings, we need to accept that we are also on this opposite trajectory where the higher beings who have longer to live are like children compared with the ancient may-flies they will become.

So which way are we evolving? From a non-dualistic viewpoint, we are evolving both ways. From a non-dualistic viewpoint, we are trying to evolve without devolving and discovering that the reverse is also happening. From the standpoint of eternity, it makes not the slightest difference where you find yourself since you have ‘all the time in the world’ to travel in both directions right round this circle. From the standpoint of finite time, it makes not the slightest difference how long you have left to live if you live in the present instant, as flies do naturally and certain long-lived races have great trouble trying to get their heads round. The best way forward for humans is still to study humans: ‘know thyself’ being where the information is to be found in a form comprehensible to humans.

Posted by Agape (here)
If you're human biologist and test whether some kind of immunity response develops in fruit flies or not , the way you do it is by watching few tens of generations of them carrying the same gene and whether the 'factor' you've challenged is preserved, becomes dominant or recessive and what kind of consequences does it produce , over generations.
From the drosophila view point , he/she the fruit fly have no idea or way to find out even . They live few days is 'whole life' .

If the same is true for this accelerated human evolution and with life spans we currently enjoy
while being watched by some million years old advanced space civilisations

the chances that we find out and will be able to speak-to-them in human physical bodies are low - from this particular biological perspective - unless we can perhaps, live much longer )

[greybeard]

Regarding what Paul and others on the thread and other threads have said

The bottom line for me is.
Would I consult Simon and would I feel concern for those who did or might in the future?

Truth is long before this and similar threads occurred I was wary of Simon, my view/opinion has not changed.

I dont think Simon has done anything illegal.

Chris

[Agape]

Araucaria, thanks again for your input , I can but try to offer you some of my perspective bellow though , we're coming to this problematics each from completely different conceptual environment and on either side that's not easy to fix at once .
Thinking you can ( or I can ) in brief article would be like thinking we can fix all the human paradigm as it stands and fix the 'rift' between polarities that predate evolution of modern humankind and version of evolutionary psychology as presented to us today by millions ( and millions of years ),
the gap - rift between male and female brain , gap between Eastern and Western philosophical approaches ,
generally a rift that is very real despite being overlooked and suppressed ,
rift between human civilisations and learning paths that evolved in deep past, continents apart , were isolated from each other for thousands of years before they came together again,
and it's fairly possible that there's no meaning in trying to do 'heal the gap' and that it can not be done , from purely evolutionary perspective ,
they have to coexist together and connect intuitively , like right and left hand spirals each turning in opposite direction , like left and right hemisphere of the brain .

It's hardly a first time I'm observing this phenomenon.

Using an example - a metaphor or parallel gives each of your 'brain halves' entirely separate option for interpretation.
An example offered to or by Vedic scholar is usually interpreted quite differently by Western based psychologist and philosopher , each based in their own cultural environment and logical pathways that evolved over very long time.

In short , cohesion in this case is not an option that can be forced , it can only evolve .

So which way are we evolving? From a non-dualistic viewpoint, we are evolving both ways.

This question itself troubles the brain of many evolutionary biologists some of whom feel quite firm about their presumed opinion .
The question would have to be further specified by you and whether you limit your understanding to specific human lineage who evolve supposedly, well and linearly forwards or whether you refer to mankind as a whole ,
which entails both evolution and devolution trajectory being present at all times .

Even from individual perspective , it's been observed that development of human intelligence is specific and compartmentalised in its 'selectivity' while sacrificing organic or psychological functions we don't use or need , temporarily or in our life times anymore .
There's more capacity 'stuffed' in your DNA , humanly speaking over the millions of years humans lived on Earth than we can ever discuss, explore or disclose ( =make obvious ).


Lets try not to override our competencies and psychological limitations incurred by the circumstances of this communication alone though .

If we stay on the subject of childhood, we do not stray off-topic, as Simon’s childhood is critical to who and what he has become. At the same time, we move into general territory that is hugely more important than the single case of any one individual. So, far from straying off-topic, we are exploring the topicality of Simon Parkes in the broader scheme of things.

The big issue, in my view, is that we take children as being dependent (the legal term), and adults by implication as independent. Raising children therefore involves giving them as much independence as possible as early as possible. When this process breaks down, you have dysfunctional families of dependent children becoming dependent adults and the whole thing becomes a nightmare. There has been a great deal said about the dysfunctional family, of which royalty and other elites are the most egregious example. If you are born to rule, then that is actually, and paradoxically, the ultimate straitjacket: your life is more or less set in stone before you are born; your family, the nation, the whole world depends upon you fulfilling your destiny. You are infinitely less free than the lowliest of your subjects. That’s what needs to be changed.

I fear I'd have to be blunt here ( not just with respect to your comments , generally ) to say what I see but it's proved more important over long time to maintain stability and good level of discussion among all those many people involved in the debate
than increasing our 'sharpness' .

As Lao'tze says in his last advice to the dying Empire .. ( looking from the 20th century perspectives of course ) and the book about Tao and the Way was allegedly compiled by him under coercion by border patrol when he ( the sage ) in beggars disguise tried to cross the border to Tibet , heading for more peaceful life ..

..decreasing ones own sharpness ,
dimming ones own blazing glow ,
organising own chaos
and identifying with own dust
is the only way of Heavenly Tao. ..


From any sort of psychological perspective however , I don't feel that regressing Simon Parkes to his toddler age , over and over again, either helps him to resolve issues or that it brings you /or us together closer to the source and 'true contact with ET' that would be genuinely reliable information.

From a point of view of adult psychologist and far as I'm aware of , and even from the trained Eastern oriented philosophical and practical school of thought ,
regressing yourself to toddler age can be done with certain marginal objectives and outcomes and no solid based psychoanalysis or regression should dwell on the process as sole footing of investigation and therapy or re-animate clients /patients/practitioners experiences of that age in prolonged manner and ad nauseam.

The dangers of doing so repeatedly and forcibly rest in tempering with early development of personality that is in that age - no matter what it bears - shrouded in safe cocoon of unconscious mind ,
unlike our adult mind , the shielding is there to allow healthy evolution of human personality later on without being bombarded by myriads of reflections and self-reflections any adult mind engages in and what we call 'being aware of too much',
all the information, all the parallels, all the pros and cons.

In short , I can't see how such a process would be really healthy and substantial source of information and self awareness for 50 plus year old human male or otherwise .

...

You may want to object how this is not the case here and Simon is actually connecting to his 'ET personality' through those regressions.

But what has happened to his organic human brain over the 50 years , can guess ? It's evolved and it's experiencing many developmental hiccups over years,
it's nevertheless and irreversibly a brain of human adult with systemic neuro-circuits evolved enough so they keep function as an adult, 50 year old town councillor Simon Parkes , father of family etc.

Where was his 'ET mind' all those years ?

We don't know.

But reconnecting fully developed human brain and rewiring it essentially to different pathways , of ET nature , be it a specific ET race or even several of them is not easy .

Most naturally and under circumstances the brain wave and its function gravitates towards the environment he's exposed to the most, the human environment .
The space for 'free fluctuation' of that brain wave that would be also functionally capable also decreases with its specialisation,
i.e, the brain gravitates to developing 'strong stand' rather than having the luxury of 'free think' at all times,
and proportionally - to compare child and adult brain functionality .

So going back to Simons regressions with Joanne Summerscales , it seems to me that the work remained unfinished and perhaps also,
Joanne as therapist was not able to either 'close the tear' as every regression therapist should be able to do in order to prevent damage after retriggering personal trauma and left him in 'loop' psychologically ,
or could not continue and guide him any further beyond that age .

When this happens , the part of the brain that connects to Simons ET contact is predominantly his 'children brain' , the immature residuum of that under normal circumstances is present in all of us but not used a lot
unless.. you reach an age of mental decline and retardation under which circumstances this part of brain keeps you alive and preserves your basic instincts .



The way I came to my awakening in this matter was possibly analogous but very different from Simons and I was about 28 at time of the big encounter in Bodhgaya which was very adult experience .
And although it had automatically 'rewired' me completely and connected to the circuits and experiences reaching far back to my childhood as well ,
the reason for how and why I came forwards at all was having fully mature recall at that time period that was not shrouded in the waters of subconscious mind ,
I did not get into this by meditating or regressing even if the years of meditation were complimentary to the process , I never developed or had to develop any sort of conscious effort in order to 'be the ET'.

Which all does not mean I'm not prone or sensitive to the human environment, if I lived in isolation from it or with others like me, I'd be more , being alone is the only way to settle in peace and resettle to be me at times,
when I have to function in the human world , I since also adopt the 'wave function' commonly shared among humans or , am coerced to it and I don't like it,
my brain does not like it and it protests , shuts down or anything similar.



I'll better finish this resume or pause at least but would like to ask everyone present to this debate for extreme sensitivity whatever it means to you.

Thanks forwards

[Agape]

Posted by greybeard (here)
Portraying Simon it the way that he was as an important whistle blower etc to my mind, brings the alternative comunity--conspiracy theorists into disrepute.
That is a shame.
Lets face it, believing a man who says he fathered a child with an alien beggars belief.
Its not biologically possible--i suspect.

All thanks to Albert e Daniela for starting this thread and other who fell foul of Simon's counseling --contributing here.
Also thanks to those who contacted Bill --privately.

The truth will out, I think it has beyond all reasonable doubt.

According to various ufology surveys and many independent reports including those from times long gone,
there are more than few hundreds of people , both males and females , around the globe who have experienced or claim to have experienced close contact with ETs and some who claim to have mothered or fathered hybrid babies .

I understand how intriguing that sounds to some , we can't make any good claims here of how that is 'biologically possible or not' ,
the one interesting facet of such reports is that they have surfaced from all kinds of cultures and places on the globe ,
long before the internet connected the broad public and information became so readily available .
Most participants /witnesses/ abductees are not well known individuals or pursuing name&fame with their claims .

To someone with no instance of experience of close ET Contact in their life and it may include some 'skeptical researchers' as well ,
all of the content of this board may sound ludicrous .

Unless that ever happened to you , speaking of ET contact in general, you can't make any sense of this I suppose .

But looking to ( remembering ) old fairytales and legends and I do think each of them may contain at least the proverbial golden seed of truth ,
cases like that were reported since mankind existed . Sometimes it was 'gods' marrying humans , fairies falling love with humans , dragons abducting princesses ,
sometimes either of them had children together who were 'special' and carried unique characteristics of both kinds .
Quite often the experiment failed as naturally as it started or did not have a good ending , there are many classical fairytale examples of that hailing from many different cultures too.

Once again and unless you've experienced close ET contact your self I am aware how this does not make great sense to you the reader and fairytales for you will remain in the fairytale land .

There's not much that any of us can do about it .

It's also quite hard and once you find yourself in 'magical trap' with off-worlders to 'cross the line' and seek human help , for the simple fact that 'normal humans' probably won't trust you and help you
unless they're somehow very old, wise and experienced humans .


Concerning the letter posted here, I don't see how this would be more 'intelligent , well composed or informatory' one compared to the thousands of similar letters
''Dear Sally'' receives every week.

Tell me of one person including the very founders of this project and anyone present who are free of relationship problems ,
or anyone who does not portray themselves as 'bright and honest' individual in their resume , tell me of any 'brave male or female ' who would admit guilt at divorce court or otherwise after leaving their partner in trouble or someone who did not experience 'betrayal' in their life .


This includes your teachers, doctors, parents , politicians ... , also dogs and cats .


I hope that everyone can have some laugh at what they did with their 'human life' when it's over and that the lady 'so concerned' is happier now for not entering to relationship with Simon.

The letter also contains some confounding clues about the writer and their intents which do not explain anything to anyone, at all.

[Agape]

Quite like in the great story about Urashima Taro and his journey to the Kingdom of Dragon King ..and back ..

like usually , he returned home penniless , forgot the princess and aged in 3 days and was then buried ceremonially in his native village , in a conch shell



Japanese fairytale

Here you can read the whole story and listen to the audio , depending on your choice ..

THE STORY OF URASHIMA TARO, THE FISHER LAD






There's no greater story than I'm telling you





The emphasis and the wisdom of the story is of course , in the human point of view ..


in the Kingdom of Dragon King in between time passes slowly , each grain of sand
counting the tides of our civilisations rise and fall,
silent witness to the mystery ..



Don't fall from the back of golden turtle little Urashima waves can be treacherous

[Chester]

OJ got off the criminal charges but he was successfully sued in civil court.

Yet those who went after them were strong folks and certainly not vulnerable like the folks that go to MK Ultra / Satanic Ritual Abuse "counselors."

Regardless - if this were a licensed therapist, the license would have been revoked based on the complaints received by the credible folks in this community.

We (in this community) do not have that sort of protection and the biggest reason why is because "we (at least most of us) don't trust those types of authorities." And so with this in mind, this is why this situation has been handled as it has. The folks here at Avalon stepped up.

If I were compromised as such:

1.) I would immediately stop all "counseling."

2.) I would remove myself from any further public appearances that in any way continue the promotion of my "material."

3.) I would seek both conventional and "other" therapy and work seriously upon myself.

4.) I would never be "Mr. Mantid / Daddy Drac Messenger / Savior / Whistle Blower / Insider guy" again and instead find a way to be myself as that should really be good enough.

[greybeard]

Integrity Sam---If one does not have that, what then!!!

Chris

[greybeard]

Lets assume it is possible for a "human" to father or be mother to an alien/hybrid child.
If the human is already in a marriage to another human--think of the hurt cause to spouse by going out and declaring on national TV that not only did you have intercourse with an alien but you produced a child by that union.
Letters to Dear Sally tend to be anonymous--seeking help--not an identifiable person.
Accepting that the majority of humans have had relationship problems.

Chris

[lightpotential]

To Sam and Greybeard,

Your points Sam were all good. Simon’s reputation as a psychic reader/healer lies in ruins.

In terms of his explanation that another entity somehow psychically raped/assaulted those he had sessions with, and that it was not him… I can only say, sadly, that on the face of it, this explanation is totally pathetic. I do not mean this in any crude way as such, and I hope that it is not understood in that way. I simply mean as a statement of fact, that his explanation is pathetic.

I could almost think that if he were not British, but an American Televangelist, he would have said: “I have Sinned,” Jimmy Swaggart style.

How could anyone have confidence in him now? My understanding is that he intends and has kept the appointments of the many dozens of individuals signed up to his 30 minute sessions who have paid.

His basic story as I understand it, is that he had a ‘psychic contamination’ since about 3 years old. He has just become aware of it, has done some sort of ‘deep scan,’ solved the problem, and now it is full steam ahead. He posted a brief statement about it and then took it down after only 2 hours.

This is hardly comforting.

And this brings me to your point Greybeard. Integrity. That truly is the word to consider here.

Simon knows he has done wrong, and he wants to cover this up, or cover over it. And that we can see this, means that he is exposed.

Only a few weeks ago I was seriously thinking of booking a soul reading session with Simon. And then, after not coming into the Avalon Forum for ages, even though I signed up years ago and do not post that often; that this story emerges now, I am inclined to think that this was divine providence acting to prevent me from booking a session with him.

Everything I have ever heard Simon say, I now question its veracity. And this makes me sad. I wish it were not so.


Sincerely

Keith

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Agape (here)
This includes your teachers, doctors, parents , politicians ... , also dogs and cats .

Just because my cat can never get her fur perfectly clean, doesn't mean she doesn't keep cleaning it.

Just because we are all imperfect beings, doesn't mean that we should abide by all manner of imperfections.

[Chester]

Posted by greybeard (here)
Integrity Sam---If one does not have that, what then!!!

Chris

That's it frankly... if you can't trust someone, how can you possibly trust their renditions of their other-worldy, unprovable "stories?"

How can you trust the validations (by citing testimony from others who do not also show impeccable integrity as often turns out to be the case).

How can anyone bite on the attempts not just by the experiencers but the presenters (which are obvious opportunists who know they are new age snake oil salesmen selling false hope) to validate these supposed insider's missions, conclusions, predictions and messages to humanity by using the lines like "s/he corraborates my other insider sources." These "stars" are just like the successful "reality TV actors" who "get it" and play along by joining in with the "mutual verifier's club.

And perhaps most important of all, how can anyone consider the paradigms these story tellers suggest as not just true for that experiencer (or perhaps the group [club] they belong to) but true for everyone. - As just one example - "The Light Trap" paradigm.

This is nothing but mind control via meme implantation. I fell for it for years but no more folks. I hope each individual wakes up and considers the likelihood that they won't ever have it all figured out but accepting this may be far, far better than thinking we do when we are actually living in Alice's Wonderland with risks to our dignity (imagine how some of those "counseled folk" feel today) much less to our wasted time and money.

extending from my previous post -

5.) Give back all the money held for pre-paid appointments that have not occurred.

6.) Make a plan on providing restitution for those harmed and/or defrauded.

Bottom line - Do the right thing. And this should go for everyone who has emerged in this community to become a public figure looked up to by the rest - do the right thing.

If your story is mostly (or all BS) - come clean.

If you see you have maybe fallen for an overactive imagination and/or a desire to be "heard" and/or you have a drive within you to make a difference but have compromised the truth for the sake of gaining greater attention... come clean, do the right thing.

If this happened, community wide, we could then go to the next level of community maturation where perhaps we can get back to truths instead of fantasy. We might find that much of the things we thought were "true" in the current accepted definition of "truth" (something set in 3D stone) is perhaps nothing of the sort. We might (for example) discover that though many other-worldly experiences greatly differ, especially with 3D linear thinking that seems to invalidate all sorts of competing paradigms - we just might discover something common to them all that lies beneath them all... something beyond all previous theories that may be the actual truths of what is behind much of these phenomena.