Posted by araucaria
(here)
The term ‘witch-hunt’ describes one negative way in which the community deals with its psychiatric and/or criminal fringe of ‘deviant’ individuals. It is negative because instead of restricting the fringe, it helps it to become mainstream, by producing many false positives notably among the creative fringe, who are exploring some advanced area ahead of the rest. If there is any type of witch-hunt going on, then some of the hunted would appear to be... among the hunters.
Disclaimer: the following are the comment of a concerned but unqualified poster. The issue here indeed is whether anyone at all is qualified to speak on certain matters. There are two sorts of somewhat qualified professions who would need consulting, in mental health and the legal system. But they are never involved until a mental health case or crime is reported to them. And when this does happen, they are not fully qualified to handle certain cases. Since both professions are called upon to respond to the causes of disruption to social harmony, the current state of human society is indication enough that they are underperforming, both through too many undetected cases and underqualification to deal with what comes to them – which are basically two ways of saying the same thing: too much is passing under the radar.
One area of underqualification is the ET picture of old souls having an experience as (initially) young humans. The soul contract is in contradiction with the mainstream view of a child having an immature brain/mind. For the first time Simon Parkes has admitted that from the age of 3 something started happening to him to which he did not consent. From a human mental health and legal standpoint, at barely half the age of reason, he could not consent to anything; in fact he could not do so until much later when he reached the legal age of consent. Sometimes, a 15-year-old girl will seem to run off consentingly with an older man. Her consent counts for nothing, and there is a legal case to be answered. The soul contract is one very handy way for getting round the law undetected.
However, it is even easier to cause trouble by bypassing even more stringent mental health recommendations. It is not illegal for a parent to walk out on their family, even though broken families do not provide the ideal start in life for any child. Note how Simon was fatherless, and practically motherless as well even before his mother was murdered. Worse still, the male presence in the household was provided by secret service agents. These may be government personnel, but they don’t even need to ‘get round the law’: they are above the law. I am sure a psychiatrist (but none has been consulted) would have plenty to say about a young child’s unusual experiences of ‘Mummy’ and Daddy’, filling the blanks with entities from elsewhere, and would take a very dim view of the associated soul contract fine print. He would also very much categorize this person as a patient, and definitely not a colleague. As it happens, psychiatry has its own category of whistle-blowers, dissatisfied ‘service users’, ‘consumers’, ‘survivors’ – they have several names for themselves – who organize themselves in advocacy groups that are an extremely helpful part of the
mental health care system. But they do not claim to supplant the professional or copy the professional’s relationship with a client/patient. That would make no sense, for if, instead of alleviating a problem, psychiatry is just another process that has to be survived, you cannot change that by continuing with provenly inadequate techniques. We are groping for fresh approaches, and these groups offer more evidence that group interaction with fellow-sufferers empathizing can often do more good than an asymmetrical one-on-one sufferer-curer relationship.
Since a forum such as Avalon operates on the lines of an advocacy group, another handy way these days to disrupt social harmony is irresponsible (or simply careless or insufficiently informed) talk on the Internet, especially when aimed at such sites. So Agape’s remark may very well be true:
However, in the case of Simon it comes fifty years too late to explain how we arrived at this point. The irresponsible talk back then was coming from those secret service agents, both through their presence and in particular by allowing a small boy to explore secret German UFO documents, which has got to be child abuse by any standards. The end result is the same whether it was just opportunistic or careless (pointless) child abuse (MI5/6 careless??), or grooming with an eye to later exploitation, i.e. now, when Simon, a third-generation asset at least, has come out as an ET whistle-blower. In such circumstances, how this material has been processed is far too doubtful to serve as evidence of anything.
The fact that needs to be taken into account in the two sides to Simon Parkes is that there are two kinds of mental health sufferers: on the one hand you have the bona fide type (hopefully the vast majority) accepting they have a problem and in order to overcome it and relieve their symptoms cooperating with carers, which includes possibly objecting to their cruder methods. But on the other hand, that reaction is already a form of mental healthiness; others may be beyond this and actually actively undermining the process. Full-blown mental illness would respond to treatment in this negative way, making it virtually incurable. The same situation is clearer in regard to crime: most crime is done by people straying outside of the law somewhat inadvertently, but you also find hardened criminals who know very well what they are about – and may even join the police to divert attention.
Again, we basically have two ways of saying the same thing: crime and mental illness both cause social disharmony; in their extreme forms, both try to keep one step ahead in being undetectable, if detected unreportable, and if reported downplayable, i.e. guilty but not responsible; e.g. bona fide – just doing one’s best; or mental illness as an excuse for crime; or victimhood – having been abused as a mitigating circumstance of abuse – X made me do it, ISIS made me do it. With no claim to originality, I would suggest that the ET phenomenon is today an important part of that arsenal of escaping personal responsibility. It is not of course the only part of that arsenal, and I hasten to add, nor is it the only part of the ET phenomenon. I am not saying that benevolent ETs do not exist. However, they would have no part in the issue of non-humanity as the ultimate excuse for inhumanity; on the contrary, they would be on the side of humanity, and very possibly greater humanity than we generally find on this planet. To find such benevolent ET presence, the best place to look is not the testimony of Simon Parkes, mostly recounting the nightmares/ravings of a mentally abused immature mind. My point is that you don’t need to go off-planet to find this type of cultural clash: it can be found within a single terrestrial human individual. See
this post describing the case of a woman in Europe of African descent where both a court of law and its psychiatric reports are seen to be floundering to explain how she came to kill her child.
Re: Our experience with Simon Parkes as a counselor
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks