WW III? China Tells Citizens to Prepare for “A People’s War at Sea”

[Fellow Aspirant]

From "The Free Thought Project"

Here's an article that recently caught my attention. It's a disturbing update concerning what appear to be preparations by China to enforce - militarily if necessary, its claims to the South China Sea. These have been ongoing for some time now, but the latest moves are a response geared toward defying an international court ruling that went against China. Besides the military preparations, the government's propaganda is now aimed at its own populace, conditioning their minds for war. This could cascade into an apocalypse, a word I almost never use. We need to keep our eyes on this part of the world.

It's very well written, so I've posted the beginning verbatim. I'll provide a link, below, to the source and the rest of this very thought-provoking piece:


"In continued rejection of last month’s ruling by a Hague-based tribunal invalidating China’s territorial claims to a vast swath of the South China Sea, on Tuesday, the Chinese defense minister urged for “substantial preparation for a people’s war at sea.”

Chinese Defense Minister Chang Wanquan also warned of “offshore security threats” and the need to acknowledge the gravity of risk to China’s national security; and advised the military, police, and populace to ready for mobilization to defend national sovereignty and territorial integrity, according to state news agency, Xinhua.

None of this bellicose rhetoric and escalation is occurring in a vacuum, of course, and while Americans seem content to analyze whether Donald Trump has experienced a psychological break or bemoan the fact Hillary Clinton hasn’t landed in federal custody, the United States meanwhile barrels toward war with China and its ally, Russia.

China’s assertions of provocation by the U.S. — backed by the deployment of an armada of ships to the South China Sea, as well as nuclear bombers to the Pacific — its rejection of the tribunal’s ruling, and promises to aggressively defend its interests at sea all point toward impending military conflict.

Claiming it wishes to ensure freedom of navigation in the geostrategically important region, the U.S. has conducted a number of military drills in the hotly-contested waters — but its premise of defense against Chinese aggression halfway around the world hardly masks what would be rightly called outright instigation.

“China doesn’t want wars, a war with the U.S. in particular,” the Global China Times wrote in an op-ed response to a Rand Corporation report showing China would suffer heavy losses should the two nations engage in military conflict. “The only possible scenario for a Sino-US war is that the U.S. corners China on its doorstep with unacceptable provocations and China has to fight back.”

It added darkly, “We will be very prudent about going to war, but if a war is triggered, we will have greater determination than the U.S. to fight it to the end and we can endure more losses than the U.S.”

On Tuesday, China’s top court ruled there exists a “clear legal basis for China to safeguard maritime order, marine safety and interests, and to exercise integrated management over the country’s jurisdictional seas.”

Though observers weren’t in complete agreement on precisely what the court intended by ‘jurisdictional seas,’ most felt the country is attempting to establish the basis for a ‘defensive’ military response against ‘trespassers’ in the disputed waters.

“It appears that China is establishing the legal basis to enforce violations of Chinese domestic law in the South China Sea,” Bonnie Glaser, director of the China Power Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, explained to Business Insider."

Read more at http://thefreethoughtproject.com/chi...6Wk1AulJkAS.99


Brian

[syrwong]

Propaganda has always been an important part of war. Have you ever heard of a country at war saying that its soldiers bombed needlessly and killed many innocent people, or wrongly raped some women? China's propaganda is mainly internal to its people. Doubtlessly the preparation for war is defensive. China does not even know how to defend herself in speech in the international arena. The spokesperson can only utter a few cliche and dare not even name directly the us. While this is so, the empire is very strong in international propaganda. An obvious infringement of territorial rights is portraited as freedom of navigation, and many people buy it. What is the Hague tribunal? Is it not just a us controlled "international" body? Why has the South China Sea been so quiet for centuries and suddenly it is in flames, coinciding with tensions in around Russia? Keep in mind that China has repeatedly said it wanted dialogue between the disputing countries for peaceful settlement, where is the dialogue instead of the "international tribunal"?

[Atlas]

Narayanman Bijukchhe, the party chairman of Nepal Workers and Peasants Party, said that the South China Sea has been unnecessarily dragged in dispute by Western countries, primarily the U.S., to maintain its hegemonic exploitation over Asian countries.

Bijukchhe called on countries in Asia to be on alert for conspiracies being hatched to arouse fight among the Asian countries.

Prem Suwal, head of the foreign relations department of the party, said Nepal should be concerned about the ongoing world politics and conspiracies hatched by some Western countries.

Surendra Raj Gosai, a member of the foreign relations department of the party, said: "Asians need to be united to foil the conspiracies of external forces".

wikipedia.org/Philippines_v._China

[StandingWave]

Could this 'blue hole' in the South China sea have anything to do with the area being contested for control?

https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1085984