Foundations, Family Trusts and NGOs... The not so hidden hands

[Cara]

There seem to be a lot of paths leading to Family Trusts, "Philanthropic" Foundations and Non-Governmental Organisations (NGOs) as the instruments through which many world events are manipulated.

These show up all over the news stories and are often referenced in threads here on Avalon.

Examples:

The George Soros linked NGOs - through the Open Society Foundation - manipulating events and the narrative. Most recently discussed here:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...tion-of-Europe

The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation linked to vaccination programmes, as discussed here:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...es#post1103491

The Rockefeller Foundation and its manipulation of a wide range of areas, but most recently education as mentioned here:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...es#post1103767

The Clinton Foundation and its Pay-for-Play links to Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State as well as its alleged dirty dealings in Haiti, discussed in many threads at the moment, but here are a couple:
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...on#post1111941
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...l-about-drugs-
and many more...

The purpose of this thread is to try to act as a "catch-all" for Family Foundation, Trust and NGO information.

Please share and contribute any and all information about these "not so hidden hands" and their influence on the world today.

Thank you

[Cara]

To begin, here is a link to the extensive research done by the Institute for the Study of Covert Politics and Globalization

This site has a vast amount of research and documentation on corporation structures and holdings, NGOs, key figures, etc. (It also explores child sex trafficking / pedophilia rings.)

Here is the introductory information to the site's research on NGOs.

https://isgp-studies.com/ngo-list-fo...anks-worldwide

Supranational society: Masterlist of 1,300 NGOs and the top 400 people in them

By: Joël van der Reijden | First version: August 9, 2005 | Last update: August 17, 2016 | NGO Study Center

The friendship Nancy and I shared with Kay Graham is one of the legacies of my government service that we cherish most. ... The Kay of the permanent establishment never lost sight of the fact that societies thrive not by the victories of their factions but by their ultimate reconciliations. Kay and I met in 1969 at the home of Joe Alsop, another member of Washington's permanent establishment.

July 23, 2001, Henry Kissinger, Eulogy for Katharine Graham of the Washington Post.

...

[Think tanks] exert definite and even considerable influence on the process of elaborating and making political decisions. It is connected with the fact that ... leaders of such centers have as a rule personal close links with the [government]. Second, the centers are created in order to prepare and adopt the major political decisions in the shade, far from public. Third, such analytical and expert centers really accumulate the best intellectual forces of the country and fourth, not always but rather often, the centers were founded simply to provide jobs to [retired] politicians.

1999, Yuri Pivovarov, 'Power Institutions in Post-Communist Russia: Official Forms and Hidden Transcrips,' p. 18 (NATO library). The influence of Russian think tanks on the executive body seems to be many times less than is the case in the United States, but the reasons for their existence seem to be the same.

Introduction

Note: The names of institutes and individuals on this page have been gathered over the course of hundreds of hours from books, newspapers, official websites (don't forget Webarchive), regular websites (names were always double checked), a number of membership lists, and the Who's Who. ISGP's membership/biography lists related to the Pilgrims, the 1001, the American Security Council, Le Cercle and other groups were used as a starting point to find all these private groups. Many sources can be found in those lists or in various articles on this website, but certainly not all - and unfortunately there's no time to include all the sources here. This page has primarily been put together to make cross referencing a hundred times easier than before.

People studying political science should have a good idea of the non-government organizations listed on this page. They vary considerable in purpose and influence, but are an integral part of the globalization process, as well as intelligence and covert operations. For an explanation of the establishments termed "Liberal", "Conservative", "Zionist" and "Vatican-Paneuropa", in which these groups are largely divided, the reader can visit the introduction page.

The names of these groups/NGOs have been collected by the author of this site over the course of eight to nine years. All really low level institutes have been left out - there are probably over a 1000 more filled with names nobody knows and which really have no influence.

What keeps this entire network afloat are funds from corporations, foundations, membership fees, fund raisers and occasional government grants is. Ban the foundations, curb corporate contributions, and the whole network will start to fall apart. I'm not necessarily saying that this is a solution.

Interestingly, back in early 2004 this author was unable to find more than six or seven of the more important organizations below on one website or in one book, even after looking for it all over the place. Often groups like the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission were mixed in with the "Illuminati", the "Freemasons" and the "New World Order". Tiny bits of information on such groups as the Pilgrims, Le Cercle, the 1001 Club, the JASON Group, the Sun Valley Meetings and others were scattered all over the place and often not freely accessible. Information on mainland Europe with regard to these kind of groups was especially scarce. And in all cases no one had a clue how various groups related to each other. As the reader can see, things have changed. A lot!

...
//

From: https://isgp-studies.com/ngo-list-fo...anks-worldwide

[Cara]

And here is something I saw this weekend signalling current relationships in the Family Foundation and Philanthropy world.

In the British newspaper, the Financial Times (FT) this weekend, there was a full page advert for the FT Philanthropy & Global Impact Summit. It is to be held at Rhodes House, Oxford University.



Here is information on the event: https://www.eiseverywhere.com/ehome/...ventid=203858&

So here is an interesting chain of relationships and links:
Family trusts <->
Global Impact <->
Rhodes House (and scholarships and some of the previous holders, e.g. Bill Clinton) <->
Oxford University <->
Financial Times (FT)

What an interesting nexus of relationships!

[Cara]

Here - DEA Official Spills the Beans on the Clinton Foundation (not just sexual abuse: maybe all about drugs) - @Bob posted about the Gates Foundation and their support for vaccines as well as the Clinton Foundation "disbursement" of funds.

Bold, coloured text highlights are my emphasis.

Posted by Bob (here)
Kinda fascinating that Bill and Melinda Gate's foundation and the Clinton Foundation are bosom buddies. http://www.thedailybell.com/news-ana...ng-bill-gates/

As we know Gates pushes worldwide mandatory vaccination using mercury laden vaccines, which are known to create immune damage (auto-immune response maladies for instance), where the dumbing down of those vaccinated is the end result (as well as some anti-body response). What is the primary goal? Dumbing down or immunity. My guess is with the mercury compounds it is to make those inoculated with the mercury to be compromised mentally.. With an idea that those compromised no longer would pose a threat, being able to 'connect the dots'.. I don't have any issue with vaccines which don't contain mercury, I do have immense issue with those that do. The discernment comes from understanding the molecular makeup of the vaccine. Proper anti-body production is fine... adding "adjunctives" as they like to call it, such as shark tissue extracts cause awful auto-immune responses.. And mercury, that is horrendous as a toxin to the damage done to the mitochondria (see my thread in Alt Med, Magnesium Bicarbonate to understand this more from a personal experience...

The Clinton Foundation is a sham. Putting 6% into programs where the rest goes to overhead, such as personal salaries to the owners, those working on the project, and other overhead such as going to the areas to make 'speeches'.. etc.

One can make the argument that the Clinton Foundation is a kind of organized crime racket.

The Clintons have ties to officials at the most important multinationals, banks and governments.

That includes Gates. None of these people can easily afford to antagonize her.

Bill and Hillary have surely used their power and influence to secretly steer US government relationships and resources to those who donated to the Foundation.

She has been accused of being especially active in soliciting donations during her time as Secretary of State.

Any donor can become a money laundering suspect if charges are leveled at Hillary Clinton and then, inevitably, at the Foundation itself.

It would seem the world’s most powerful people have a stake in ensuring that Hillary walks.

Paul, predicting that the 'chaos' would increase is certainly an understatement..

Still seems to me, What is needed is for Folks to connect the dots, the voters to connect the dots, the rest of the World to connect the dots. When the people wake up, the tyrants do get very edgy.. Reactive even..

[Cara]

Here is an organisation in the USA called SourceWatch:

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/SourceWatch

Their objective seems to be to keep track of organisations and individuals who have influence on the policy and activities of government. From the site:

The Center for Media and Democracy (CMD) publishes SourceWatch, this collaborative, specialized encyclopedia of the people, organizations, and issues shaping the public agenda. SourceWatch profiles the activities of front groups, PR spinners, industry-friendly experts, industry-funded organizations, and think tanks trying to manipulate public opinion on behalf of corporations or government. We also highlight key public policies they are trying to affect and provide ways to get involved. In addition, SourceWatch contains information about others who help document information about PR spin, such as reporters, academics, and watchdog groups.

To get started, there's a link to your left on the basics of how you can help write history. We also have guides, such as how to research front groups and uncover propaganda tactics, such as the use of the "third party technique," as well as great insider tips for web researching.

Launched in 2003, SourceWatch now has 72,327 articles, as of today, thanks to interested contributors like you, and over six million new visitors to its pages a year and many returning visitors who rely on our articles regularly.

Welcome to the SourceWatch community! Lisa Graves, Executive Director of the Center for Media and Democracy, publisher of SourceWatch, PRWatch, and BanksterUSA

The site is in the form of a Wiki, and it appears that anyone can sign up to become a contributor.

There are relatively detailed entries on:

• George Soros - http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/George_Soros
• The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation - http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php...tes_Foundation
  
  but not much on
• The Clinton Foundation - http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php...on&redirect=no - not sure if this infers a bias to the Wiki or not.

In spite of this oversight, overall I think this is a good source of information for NGOs and Foundations with lots of links and citations to further information

[Cara]

And here is another source for information on the power players, called Muckety:

http://news.muckety.com/

From the site:

Welcome to Muckety, where interactive maps enable you to explore relationships of the rich, powerful and connected.

We list top government and political figures, as well as board members of Fortune 1000 companies, major nonprofits and influential colleges.

We show lobbyists, political contributors, Hollywood celebs and pop culture icons. Occasionally, we even map fictional characters such as Harry Potter.

Included are many maps of various rich and powerful individuals and their relationships to others. Here is an example one of George Soros:


These maps are interactive and you can navigate through the relationships (you need Flash installed for this).

Each map also includes an information outline of the person:

George Soros
Hedge funder
Gender: Male
Age in 2016: 86

Address: Lives and/or works in
New York, NY

Wealth class: Billionaire

Susan Weber Soros map

Areas of interest:

• nonprofits
• education
• business
• media
• politics & government

Politics: Soros is a contributor to Democratic committees and campaigns.
He also has affiliations with center-left think tanks.

Personal social network: Much of Soros's Muckety comes from political connections.
He is listed in the Muckety 400.

Philanthropy: Soros pledged $100 million to Human Rights Watch in 2010. He pledged $60 million the following year to Bard College.

Financial information:
As an officer, director and/or owner of publicly traded securities, Soros has filed documents with the Securities and Exchange Commission. >> See filings

George Soros personal relations:

• Tamiko Bolton - spouse
• Michael Douglas - friend
• Alexander Soros - son
• Andrea Soros - daughter
• Daisy M. Soros - sister-in-law
• Gregory Soros - son
• Jeffrey Soros - nephew
• Jonathan Soros - son
• Paul Soros (deceased) - brother
• Robert Soros - son
• Michael Vachon - political director

Other current George Soros relationships:

• Brain Trauma Foundation - director
• Breakthrough Energy Coalition - member
• Bretton Woods Committee - member
• Council on Foreign Relations - member
• Drug Policy Alliance - director
• Earth Institute - advisory board member
• Geosor Corp. - owner
• Institute for New Economic Thinking - co-founder
• International Crisis Group - board member
• Most Influential New Yorkers - listed
• Open Society Foundations - founder & chairman
• Quantum Fund - founder
• Ready PAC - co-chair, national finance council
• Refugees International - director emeritus
• Soros Charitable Foundation - trustee
• Soros Economic Development Fund - founder
• Soros Fund Charitable Foundation - director
• Soros Fund Management - founder
• Soros Humanitarian Foundation - chair
• Soros Strategic Partners - founder

George Soros past relationships:

• 2009 Barack Obama inaugural committee - major contributor
• America Coming Together - supporter
• American Bridge 21st Century - contributor
• Marcy Blum - 2013 wedding coordinator
• Bono - attended 2013 wedding reception
• Catalist - investor
• Center for American Progress - supporter
• Michael Crichton (deceased) - bought Bedford (NY) estate from
• Democracy Alliance - member
• Foundation to Promote Open Society - chairman
• Harlem Children's Zone - benefactor
• Human Rights Watch - benefactor
• Toomas Ilves - guest at 2013 wedding
• Immigrant Voters Win - contributor
• Joint Victory Campaign - contributor
• Joint Victory Campaign 2004 - supporter
• Jim Yong Kim - guest at 2013 wedding
• Christine Lagarde - attended 2013 wedding reception
• Laureate Education Inc. - investor
• Majority PAC - contributor
• Media Fund - contributor
• MoveOn.org - contributor
• Gavin Newsom - invited to 2013 wedding reception
• NPR - benefactor
• OneWest Bank Group LLC - investor
• Nancy Pelosi - invited to 2013 wedding reception
• Priorities USA Action - contributor
• Julian H. Robertson Jr. - invited to 2013 wedding reception
• Safety & Justice - contributor
• Mark Schwartz - senior adviser
• Ellen Johnson Sirleaf - guest at 2013 wedding
• Annaliese Witschak Soros - spouse
• Susan Weber Soros - spouse
• White House visits (2009) - visitor
• Kimba M. Wood - officiated at 2013 wedding
• World Economic Forum 2008 - attendee
• World Economic Forum 2009 - attendee
• William D. Zabel - divorce lawyer

Additional Muckety map information sources:

• Alpha Magazine
• Bloomberg
• Daily Beast
• Federal Election Commission
• Forbes
• Guidestar
• New York Times
• Securities and Exchange Commission
• Syracuse Post-Standard

Muckety draws information from thousands of sources. For a list of primary government and news sites, see our Sources page.

Contributor on Dem-Rep spectrum

George Soros campaign contributions:
Listed below are federal donations of $3,000+ reported to the FEC.

• Sos for Democracy - $250,000 on 6/19/2014
• Wake County Democratic Party Federal Campaign Committee - $10,000 on 7/17/2014
• Nunn Victory Fund - $10,000 on 8/5/2014
• Win Minnesota Federal PAC - $35,000 on 7/7/2014
• Pac for a Level Playing Field - $5,000 on 12/26/2014
• Friends of Democracy - $250,000 on 9/12/2014
• House Majority Pac - $500,000 on 7/11/2014
• Planned Parenthood Votes - $500,000 on 9/12/2014
• League of Conservation Voters Victory Fund - $500,000 on 7/16/2014
• Senate Majority PAC - $500,000 on 9/16/2014
• Peters for Michigan - $5,200 on 6/20/2014
• Peters for Michigan - $5,200 on 6/20/2014
• Connecticut Democratic State Central Committee - $10,000 on 9/22/2014
• Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee - $33,400 on 5/31/2015
• Kentucky State Democratic Central Executive Committee - $10,000 on 10/16/2014
• Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee - $32,400 on 6/27/2014
• Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee - $5,200 on 6/12/2014
• Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee - $5,200 on 6/12/2014
• Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee - $5,200 on 6/12/2014
• Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee - $20,000 on 3/31/2013
• Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee - $20,000 on 3/31/2014
• American Bridge 21st Century - $500,000 on 2/7/2014
• American Bridge 21st Century - $500,000 on 12/30/2013
• Friends of Democracy - $5,000 on 12/20/2013
• Pac for a Level Playing Field - $5,000 on 11/22/2013
• Ready for Hillary PAC - $25,000 on 9/14/2013
• Priorities USA Action - $1,000,000 on 10/4/2012
• House Majority Pac - $250,000 on 10/2/2012
• Progressive Change Campaign Committee - $5,000 on 7/16/2012
• House Majority Pac - $100,000 on 8/31/2012
• Planned Parenthood Action Fund Inc. PAC - $5,000 on 8/2/2012
• Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee - $20,000 on 6/21/2012
• Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee - $20,000 on 6/22/2012
• American Bridge 21st Century - $1,000,000 on 6/15/2012
• Leadership That Listens PAC - $5,000 on 6/13/2012
• Majority PAC - $100,000 on 12/29/2011
• Pac to the Future - $5,000 on 6/17/2011
• Campaign for Our Country - $5,000 on 2/7/2011
• House Majority Pac - $75,000 on 5/19/2011
• Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee - $25,000 on 11/18/2010
• Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee - $20,000 on 6/29/2010
• Pac to the Future - $5,000 on 3/29/2010
• Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee - $15,000 on 12/31/2009
• Democratic National Committee - $15,200 on 10/29/2009
• Planned Parenthood Action Fund Inc. PAC - $5,000 on 8/12/2009
• Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee - $5,000 on 6/25/2009
• Franken Recount Fund - $10,000 on 3/25/2009
• Franken Recount Fund - $12,300 on 12/8/2008
• Democratic Party of Virginia - $10,000 on 12/5/2008
• Democratic National Committee - $21,750 on 6/30/2007
• Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee - $21,750 on 6/29/2007
• Actblue - $6,900 on 5/11/2008
• Nebraskans for Kleeb - $4,600 on 5/13/2008
• Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee - $21,750 on 6/29/2007
• Major contributions to state-level political organizations & campaigns:
• 2006 Bill Richardson (NM) gubernatorial campaign - $25,000 on 7/24/2006
• Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation (CA) - $400,000 on 8/28/2008
• Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation (CA) - $1,000,000 on 1/25/2008
• Contributions to political organizations reporting to IRS:
• Progressive Change Campaign Committee Non-Federal - $4,000 on 7/9/2010
• Progressive Change Campaign Committee Non-Federal - $4,000 on 6/30/2010
• Secretary of State Project - $10,000 on 9/30/2008
• America Votes 2006 - $10,000 on 7/7/2006
• Progressive Kick - $15,000 on 6/5/2006
• Progressive Kick - $12,500 on 4/24/2006

Contributions to misc. political organizations:
Barack Obama inauguration - $50,000

Muckety news stories featuring George Soros
George Soros weds for third time
It was described as a "small wedding," but anyone who glimpsed even a partial guest list might mistake it for an international summit.
September 22, 2013
Beautiful women and ugly rich guys
The gossip sites are buzzing with word of Cameron Diaz's latest possible romance.
May 31, 2013
The most-connected hedge funders
Top investors are known for focusing on money networks more than social networks.
February 28, 2013
Soros increases his stake in AIG
One of the likely beneficiaries of the government-backed recovery of American International Group: billionaire George Soros.
November 18, 2012
Soros can't claim rights to 'open society'
When the pope calls on Cuba to build an "open society," he inadvertently calls George Soros to mind.
March 27, 2012
Corzine and Soros reviled for different reasons
Two of the most hated names in global finance are Jon Corzine and George Soros.
December 12, 2011
Soros returning investor money
Billionaire George Soros is ending a 40-year career of investing other people's money.
July 26, 2011
George Soros is in Glenn Beck's cross-hairs
Of the hundreds of thousands of people we profile on Muckety, George Soros is one of the most popular with our users.
November 12, 2010
So far, Mr. Potter is winning
George Bailey's desperate efforts to avoid the collapse of Bailey's Savings & Loan have a special resonance this Christmas.
December 20, 2009

Recommended reading:
Soros: The Life and Times of a Messianic Billionaire, by Michael T. Kaufman

I would recommend this site as a good source for finding information about the power players involved with various Foundations, NGOs and Trusts.

[Cara]

Browsing through the Muckety site, turned up this map - Foreign Relations Elite:



It's interesting to see the names that DON'T appear in the press...

[Cara]

Here is an interesting schematic showing links from different players and foundations to media and "thought leaders". I think it is somewhat out of date so not all information included is current.



I found it here: http://www.911conspiracy.tv/Noam_Cho...e_Zwicker.html

[Cara]

Soros shenanigans, as posted here (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1112806) by @Hervé:

Posted by Hervé (here)
MoveOn "activists" march against Trump: George Soros begins his color revolution in America

Alex Christoforou The Duran Thu, 10 Nov 2016 00:00 UTC

Anti-Trump protesters march through the streets of New York shouting 'Not my president'.

MoveOn.org is a George Soros NGO...and George Soros NGOs have nothing to do with charity or justice, and everything to do with political leverage, and in extreme cases government insurrection.

We have seen Soros begin destructive movements to remove those he deems unsuitable to govern in a variety of countries, most recently in Ukraine, with the Soros sponsored Maidan coup.

Now it looks like Soros may be setting his sights on sabotaging the forthcoming Trump presidency.

We do know, thanks to Wikileaks, that George Soros was a huge supporter of Hillary Clinton, as Hillary Clinton was always looking out of George Soros' best interests.

We are certain Trump's victory is a bitter pill for globalist Soros to swallow. Between Putin and Trump, Soros may finally be starting to feel his power on the world stage falter.

We will see if MoveOn.org's call to protest has legs, or if it will gradually fizzle and fade, in much the same way we can only hope Soros will eventually do.

[...]

Full article: http://theduran.com/george-soros-beg...s-march-trump/

[Cara]

More details of Family Trust and Foundations "playing" in the world provided here (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1112909) by @Bob - thank you.

Bold, coloured text emphases are mine.

Posted by Bob (here)
Definition of MSM - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mainstream_media

Mainstream media (MSM) is a term and abbreviation used to refer collectively to the various large mass news media that influence a large number of people, and both reflect and shape prevailing currents of thought.

Although the current belief is that MSM is JUST large organizations, such as large news conglomerates, including newspapers and broadcast media, it seems to me smaller organizations who "influence a large number of people to reflect and shape prevailing currents of thought" can become MSM-LIKE.

MSM are paid shills - when those who pay feel the advertisement produced by MSM needs to change, they will dictate the change to MSM who will duly follow the instructions by those who pay them.

In my humble OPINION these would be some examples that fit the MSM definition:

MSNBC - It is owned by the NBCUniversal News Group, a unit of the NBC-Universal Television Group division of NBCUniversal, all of which are owned by Comcast. MSNBC and msnbc.com were founded in 1996 as a partnership between Microsoft and General Electric's NBC unit, hence the network's naming.

Microsoft -> Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
General Electric -> is a funder of

• Bill, Hillary and Chelsea Clinton Foundation
• Center for American Progress
• Center for Strategic and International Studies
• Citizens for a Sound Economy
• plus a large number of lobby firms... see http://www.muckety.com/General-Elect...000769.muckety for more details

Posted by Bob (here)
FOX - Murdoch and his family own both 21st Century Fox and News Corp through the Murdoch Family Trust. Fox is also a part-owner of the streaming video service Hulu.

Rupert Murdoch -> Murdoch Family Trust
See here for more on Murdoch - http://www.muckety.com/K-Rupert-Murdoch/906.muckety

Posted by Bob (here)
CNN - The Cable News Network (CNN) is an American basic cable and satellite television channel that is owned by the Turner Broadcasting System division of Time Warner.
...

Ted Turner ->

• Turner Foundation
• Chairman of Better World Fund
• United Nations Foundation

Time Warner -> funder of

• Center for American Progress
• plus many lobby firms, more details at:

Posted by Bob (here)
ABC - The Walt Disney Company owns the ABC television network; cable networks including ESPN, the Disney Channel, SOAPnet, A&E and Lifetime; 277 radio stations, music- and book-publishing companies; film-production companies Touchstone, Miramax and Walt Disney Pictures; Pixar Animation Studios.

Disney ->

• "Disney is a "heavy hitter" lobbyist according to the Center for Responsive Politics, reporting $3.5 million spent in 2014 on lobbying related to issues including copyright, television broadcasting, taxes, international trade, tourism, advertising, insurance, and telecommunications.[9] Disney has been a major lobbyist on the Trans Pacific Partnership trade agreement.[10]
• Disney has been criticized for poor labor practices, including outsourcing and opposition to worker organizing efforts in the United States and offshoring consumer goods production to factories outside the U.S. with poor working conditions.[8]"
  More at Sourcewatch: http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Disney

Posted by Bob (here)
CBS - CBS Corporation is controlled by Sumner Redstone through National Amusements, which also controls the current Viacom.

Sumner Redstone ->

• Chairman Emeritus of CBS
• Chairman of National Amusements
• Trustee of Paley Center for Media
• Chairman Emeritus of Viacom

More on Sumner Redstone here: http://www.muckety.com/Sumner-M-Redstone/2479.muckety

Posted by Bob (here)
CBC - he Canadian Broadcasting Corporation, branded as CBC/Radio-Canada, is a Canadian crown corporation that serves as the national public radio and television broadcaster.

Canadian Crown Corporations ->

• Canadian Crown corporations are enterprises owned by the Sovereign of Canada (ie. the Crown) (from Wikipedia, here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_...ions_of_Canada)

Sovereign of Canada -> The Monarchy of Canada

• The monarchy is the foundation of the executive (Queen-in-Council), legislature (Queen-in-Parliament), and judiciary (Queen-on-the-Bench) in the federal and each provincial jurisdiction.[10]
• The Canadian sovereign is the personification of the Canadian state and,[11][12] as a matter of constitutional law, is Canada.[17]
• The current Canadian monarch, since 6 February 1952, is Queen Elizabeth II.

(from Wikipedia here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monarchy_of_Canada)

Posted by Bob (here)
BBC - owned by the Government of the United Kingdom - The British Broadcasting Corporation is a British public service broadcaster. It is headquartered at Broadcasting House in London, and is the world's oldest national broadcasting organisation.

BBC ->

• The BBC is established under a Royal Charter

Royal Charter ->

• A royal charter is a formal document issued by a monarch as letters patent, granting a right or power to an individual or a body corporate.
• They were, and are still, used to establish significant organisations such as cities (with municipal charters) or universities and learned societies. Charters should be distinguished from warrants and letters of appointment, as they have perpetual effect

(more at Wikipedia here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_...United_Kingdom)

Posted by Bob (here)
DirecTV - AT&T is new owner of DirecTV.

AT&T -> funder of / doner to

• Democratic National Convention
• Republican National Convention
• American Legislative Exchange Council
• Brookings Institution
• Center for American Progress
• and many lobby firms

More information at: http://www.muckety.com/AT-T-Inc/5000173.muckety

There are a few others (Veterans Today, RT, and DishNetwork) mentioned in @Bob's original post.

Center for American Progress shows up a several times here... here is more from SourceWatch (http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php...rican_Progress):

The Center for American Progress was begun in 2003 with funding from philanthropists Herbert M. Sandler and Marion O. Sandler[1] It is a Washington, DC-based liberal think tank created and led by President and Chief Executive Officer John D. Podesta, the head of Barack Obama's presidential transition team after the 2008 election and former Chief of Staff for President Bill Clinton.

In 2009 CAP's Progressive Media project emerged as a major communications war room on behalf of Obama's domestic and foreign policy agenda and CAP became a strong advocate for escalation in Afghanistan. Progressive Media is run through the Center for American Project Action Fund, the more political 501(c)4 arm of CAP. It coordindates closely with the Common Purpose Project, an effort to create message discipline among the pro-Obama organizations, with a direct tie to the White House.

CAP is the parent organization of Campus Progress. The Center publishes a daily emailed Progress Report, described by the National Review to be "The most aggressive, most energetic opposition research in politics."

Phew - long post, thank you to patient, persistent readers for plowing through it all!

[Cara]

Some details of George Soros and his Open Society Foundation and their links to the Comet Pizza and Spirit Cooking drama as shared by @Houman in the Horus-Ra as the Archontic Alien Parasite: A follow-up interview with Maarit thread - thank you @Houman

Posted by Houman (here)
The ball keeps rolling...

https://twitter.com/goy_orbison/stat...02308959928320
http://archive.is/afTPu

http://docquery.fec.gov/cgi-bin/fecimg/?14960793887

[Cara]

I came across this image online but cannot locate its source, or the document / article it belongs to. It shows family connections to some central body called "The Order".... not sure what this could be? Perhaps the Skull and Bones Order? The image URL links to Bibliotecapleyades but when I do a Google Image search, it cannot find the image at all, never mind on Bibliotecapleyades.

Does anyone have any ideas?

[Hervé]

Posted by Searcher (here)
I came across this image online but cannot locate its source, or the document / article it belongs to. It shows family connections to some central body called "The Order".... not sure what this could be? Perhaps the Skull and Bones Order? The image URL links to Bibliotecapleyades but when I do a Google Image search, it cannot find the image at all, never mind on Bibliotecapleyades.

Does anyone have any ideas?

Found it here: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/so...llbones11a.htm (scroll down the page almost to the bottom)


Antony Sutton

Return to Contents

[Cara]

This is not directly about Foundations, Trusts and NGOs, but rather more about secret societies. What IS related, is the family name list - families that are part of the secret society Skull and Bones at Yale.

Posted by witchy1 (here)
For over 150 years, "Bonesmen" have run the world from positions in banking, intelligence, media, law and government. Members included Presidential handler Averell Harriman, anti war leader William Sloan Coffin, Time-Life magnate Henry Luce, Truman war secretary Henry Stimson (responsible for dropping the atomic bomb), pseudo conservative William F. Buckley and many more.

...

In 1983, Dr. Sutton received a list of Skull and Bones members and immediately recognized the names of many men who controlled American policy. He published a book entitled "America's Secret Establishment: An Introduction to the Order of Skull and Bones" (1986). He updated and republished this book just before his death last June at age 77. Here are some of his conclusions.

"The Order" is " a purely American phenomenon with German origin." Dr. Sutton compares it to the Round Table, Cecil Rhodes' secret society at Oxford also known as "The Group." The American and British entities consist of 20-30 dynastic families each. Jewish banking interests connect them.

"The links between 'The Order' and Britain go through Lazard Freres and the private merchant banks... 'The Group' links to the Jewish equivalent through the Rothschilds in Britain... 'The Order' in the US links to the Guggenheim, Schiff and Warburg families." (23

As Dr. Sutton notes, the "Order" had definite anti Semitic tendencies but by the 1960's, many Jewish names started to appear among the 15 annual inductees.

See list of Skull and Bones members. (Far too many to post here)

Dr. Sutton believes the "left" versus "right" split is fraudulent and used to control the debate and condition citizens to think along certain lines. Left-wing magazines like the "The Nation" and "The New Republic" and right-wing magazines like "The National Review were "artificially set up." The former were financed by Whitney money while the latter by Buckley. Both are "The Order."
...

Dr. Sutton believes The Order has many weaknesses resulting from an inbred gene pool, a shallow power base and a limited worldview. In any future conflict between the authoritarian state and the individual, he believes opposition will take "a million forms."
..

and

Posted by Searcher (here)
...
America's Secret Establishment by Anthony C. Sutton
...

The back cover of the ebook (page 2 in the PDF link) has a list of notable Skull and Bones families included:


Just in case the small font in the inset box lower right - Notable Bones Families - is not readable, the names are:

• Aldrich
• Buckley
• Bush
• Bundy
• Cheney
• Daniels
• Davison
• Dodge
• Gates
• Goodyear
• Gould
• Harriman
• Kellogg
• Lord
• Lovett
• Luce
• Phelps
• Pillsbury
• Pinchot
• Rockefeller
• Stimson
• Taft
• Vanderbilt
• Wyerhauser
• Whitney

[Cara]

Posted by Hervé (here)
Found it here: http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/so...llbones11a.htm (scroll down the page almost to the bottom)


Antony Sutton

Return to Contents

Thank you @Hervé - you must be a Bibliotecapleyades super-user

[Cara]

Found an interesting analysis and commentary in an essay by Jasun Horsley (http://auticulture.com/) that I am busy reading. The article is a social and cultural commentary entitled Vicious Circles & Angry Squares: Pedophilia, Scapegoating, Taboo, & Social Control (Part One)

Article here: https://auticulture.wordpress.com/20...trol-part-one/

It includes a discussion of taboo, social control, political correctness, censure and shaming, divide and conquer via identity politics. You might not agree with everything Jasun Horsely writes but he explores many topics and is prepared to question official, alternative, "left", "right", etc. narratives.

Here are some extracts from the article that speak to social control by the power players - using the "scapegoating" principle:

Regardless of which minority or which kind of “prejudice” is being addressed, it is all scapegoating. It is the same social principal being applied to achieve the ends of an actual privileged minority class. What can be said about this group is very little. But they may not even be racist, homophobic, or misogynist at all; they may be something far beyond such limited and limiting terms (terms they would have created deliberately to befog the rest of us). It’s likely they view themselves as superior to all humankind, as we think of the term, regardless of type or orientation. And the worst of it is that, even by trying to identify and categorize them (the Kakistocracy), we are potentially playing into their hands.

The result of this long-term divide and conquer plan is to polarize people even more than they were before, and even as they are being mashed together into one great, happy, homogenous blob. Someone who might have been willing to accept homosexuality as a mostly harmless deviation will not be so willing to accept it as an ipso facto good thing. If they are forced to choose between ignorant intolerance and the neoliberal libertine avocation of just about every last form of sexual variation, they may well take refuge in the “homophobia” camp just to cling to some vestige of sanity (I know I have been tempted). We saw the same basic pattern played out with Trump’s election. When forced to choose between the advancing neoliberal lockstep represented by Hillary, and a reactionary revolt against all things PC in the form of the id-monster Trump, people “chose” the id. I don’t blame them, though I do blame them for being stupid enough to think Trump is an outsider or “wild card” in the oligarchical game, for not realizing that the oligarchy hold all the cards because that’s what makes them the oligarchy (they create their own rules, they decide which cards are wild, which ones trump the rest). But then, the aim of the divide and conquer game is to ensure there is no dialogue between opposing points of view, no comparing of the data, no middle ground, so everyone who plays it plays without a full deck. Divide and conquer means creating points of view that oppose and reinforce each other while being equally erroneous because devoid of true context.

From a long term view, it’s possible to see how the same social programs, values, and agendas (and even the same groups) that, for example, practiced slavery, over time adjusted it into less obviously exploitative social arrangements, how they then endorsed and pushed anti-racist ideologies while at the same time continuing to exploit people of whatever color in more or less the same ways. Like what corporations did with cigarettes: get us hooked on them and then tell us how deadly they are. Internal divide and conquer strategy means implementing racially (and sexually) exploitative social programs and ideologies (ones that have a basis in territoriality, i.e., that correspond with deep biological programs, something neoliberalism denies), then tell us racism is wrong, morally speaking. Ditto with women and misogyny, homosexuality and homophobia, and so on.

Social engineering employs taboo to control, oppress, and exploit the populace regardless of color, race, sex, age, or ideological affiliation. How it works, as far as I can figure it (I am still trying to wrap my mind around it) is by creating taboos out of the very things which the ruling classes are doing behind closed doors (in dungeons, basements, occult lodges, churches, schools, night clubs, or Pizza restaurants), as well as some of the things they are doing openly (corporate crimes etc.). Taboo-fearing people will keep to the behaviors prescribed to them in order to avoid the consequences. I am sure anyone who’s alive can relate to this, and if they can’t, they are probably among the ruling class (“psychopaths”). Ordering society by using taboo is like corralling cows with electric fences and cattle prods. You create the structures you want them to enter into, then you provide the “shocks” to ensure they do. When fear drives, the devil rides.

//

Full article at: https://auticulture.wordpress.com/20...trol-part-one/

[shaberon]

Searcher, I think this thread points at the heart of the thing pretty well.

I also recently discovered Joel v. d. Reijden's site (European sites do not figure prominently in U. S. based searches). This is better information than 90% of what's out there, and another big theme of his, points out that: if instead of addressing the NGOs and other perfectly tangible connections, someone is talking about the Masons, Illuminati, or NWO, it's a red herring (false lead). This dismisses almost the entirety of Coast to Coast guests.

I don't have much to add. It may be on Avalon, but there was a fairly recent Swiss study on interlocking directorates which was fairly telling. I'm undecided about the possibility of a "Grey Pope"--i. e. a non-office holder who, through prestige or some similar means, is in a position to advise or command the Black Pope. I tend to agree the original "family trusts" started in Venice and hold complete continuity through European history to the modern U. S.

[Flash]

Posted by Searcher (here)
To begin, here is a link to the extensive research done by the Institute for the Study of Covert Politics and Globalization

This site has a vast amount of research and documentation on corporation structures and holdings, NGOs, key figures, etc. (It also explores child sex trafficking / pedophilia rings.)

Here is the introductory information to the site's research on NGOs.

https://isgp-studies.com/ngo-list-fo...anks-worldwide

Supranational society: Masterlist of 1,300 NGOs and the top 400 people in them

By: Joël van der Reijden | First version: August 9, 2005 | Last update: August 17, 2016 | NGO Study Center

The friendship Nancy and I shared with Kay Graham is one of the legacies of my government service that we cherish most. ... The Kay of the permanent establishment never lost sight of the fact that societies thrive not by the victories of their factions but by their ultimate reconciliations. Kay and I met in 1969 at the home of Joe Alsop, another member of Washington's permanent establishment.

July 23, 2001, Henry Kissinger, Eulogy for Katharine Graham of the Washington Post.

...

[Think tanks] exert definite and even considerable influence on the process of elaborating and making political decisions. It is connected with the fact that ... leaders of such centers have as a rule personal close links with the [government]. Second, the centers are created in order to prepare and adopt the major political decisions in the shade, far from public. Third, such analytical and expert centers really accumulate the best intellectual forces of the country and fourth, not always but rather often, the centers were founded simply to provide jobs to [retired] politicians.

1999, Yuri Pivovarov, 'Power Institutions in Post-Communist Russia: Official Forms and Hidden Transcrips,' p. 18 (NATO library). The influence of Russian think tanks on the executive body seems to be many times less than is the case in the United States, but the reasons for their existence seem to be the same.

Introduction

Note: The names of institutes and individuals on this page have been gathered over the course of hundreds of hours from books, newspapers, official websites (don't forget Webarchive), regular websites (names were always double checked), a number of membership lists, and the Who's Who. ISGP's membership/biography lists related to the Pilgrims, the 1001, the American Security Council, Le Cercle and other groups were used as a starting point to find all these private groups. Many sources can be found in those lists or in various articles on this website, but certainly not all - and unfortunately there's no time to include all the sources here. This page has primarily been put together to make cross referencing a hundred times easier than before.

People studying political science should have a good idea of the non-government organizations listed on this page. They vary considerable in purpose and influence, but are an integral part of the globalization process, as well as intelligence and covert operations. For an explanation of the establishments termed "Liberal", "Conservative", "Zionist" and "Vatican-Paneuropa", in which these groups are largely divided, the reader can visit the introduction page.

The names of these groups/NGOs have been collected by the author of this site over the course of eight to nine years. All really low level institutes have been left out - there are probably over a 1000 more filled with names nobody knows and which really have no influence.

What keeps this entire network afloat are funds from corporations, foundations, membership fees, fund raisers and occasional government grants is. Ban the foundations, curb corporate contributions, and the whole network will start to fall apart. I'm not necessarily saying that this is a solution.

Interestingly, back in early 2004 this author was unable to find more than six or seven of the more important organizations below on one website or in one book, even after looking for it all over the place. Often groups like the Council on Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission were mixed in with the "Illuminati", the "Freemasons" and the "New World Order". Tiny bits of information on such groups as the Pilgrims, Le Cercle, the 1001 Club, the JASON Group, the Sun Valley Meetings and others were scattered all over the place and often not freely accessible. Information on mainland Europe with regard to these kind of groups was especially scarce. And in all cases no one had a clue how various groups related to each other. As the reader can see, things have changed. A lot!

...
//

From: https://isgp-studies.com/ngo-list-fo...anks-worldwide

What I will write may look stupid, in fact, it is stupid, but there is something strange in the picture below. The men in that picture pretty much all look alike. Except for one, they all have pointed noses, except for another one, they all are pretty much of the same stature physically, except for one, they all have similar foreheads and tight mouths (small lips). The most dissimilar one is the fourth one when starting to count from the left.

Is it what we call bloodline???

[Cara]

Posted by shaberon (here)
I don't have much to add. It may be on Avalon, but there was a fairly recent Swiss study on interlocking directorates which was fairly telling. I'm undecided about the possibility of a "Grey Pope"--i. e. a non-office holder who, through prestige or some similar means, is in a position to advise or command the Black Pope. I tend to agree the original "family trusts" started in Venice and hold complete continuity through European history to the modern U. S.

Thanks @shaberon.

Do you have any more information about the Swiss study so I can go searching for it?

Thanks for the insight on the "family trusts" line all the way back to Venice. I have not read Joseph Farrell's "Financial Vipers of Venice" yet, but I think it might go into this area a bit. Do you have any suggestions on sources for tracing things back to Venice besides this?

[Cara]

Posted by Flash (here)
What I will write may look stupid, in fact, it is stupid, but there is something strange in the picture below. The men in that picture pretty much all look alike. Except for one, they all have pointed noses, except for another one, they all are pretty much of the same stature physically, except for one, they all have similar foreheads and tight mouths (small lips). The most dissimilar one is the fourth one when starting to count from the left.

Is it what we call bloodline???

Hmmm.... very interesting eagle-eye @Flash - thanks for pointing that out.

I didn't really look at the photograph in that way but since you point it out, the facial structure certainly seems to indicate some kind of genetic linkages.

With the reports of generational abuse in certain families that is hinted at in reports of peadophilia along with the practice of marrying in the family that European nobility used to follow (and probably still do but it's less talked about now)... it would certainly seem to support this family ties and bloodline argument... and it shows up visually if you look.