Project Camelot interviews William Tompkins: Selected By Extraterrestrials

[norman]

If anyone wants an mp3 audio version of the Interview with Kerry Cassidy, it's available here:

Part 1:
https://app.box.com/s/fwpgw1ji2iycueng36k81gt49hl9dbv6

Part 2:
https://app.box.com/s/v3aivk40540dvffor2uyw1uggujw4mmc

[Builder]

Posted by TrumanCash (here)
As I had direct contact with the Annunaki in Egypt, I found it very interesting that he indicated that the Annunaki were Reptilians. This has always been an enigma to me because they looked very human (i.e., Ra and Ptah).

Did they have green eyes, white skin, red hair and beards?

To me the explanation that Simon Parkes gives sounds most convincing. They were genetically created by the reptilians and installed as governors to help rule the planet. They got some reptilian DNA to elevate them above the average humans and to make them feel as offspring of the reptilians to keep their loyalty. At the same time they look human enough to be accepted as human leaders without all the terror and alienation that comes with a pure reptilian face.

It is also odd that they often don masks over their bearded human-looking faces. So if they are reptilian and present a (deceptive) human form why would they also wear masks?

If their looks were somewhere between human and reptilian, then a little bit of mind projection would be sufficient to appear human. But keeping up that projection all the time could be straining.

[Cardillac]

just as an aiside: as I work in the realm of the theater and can spot a wig on sight: why is William Tomkins wearing a primitive skull-cap with hair that isn't even glued on (look at the space between his skin and the hair piece)?!-

anyone not yet noticed he's wearing an extremely primitive head cover?- if so, why NOT!?-

am I the only member of this forum who has noticed this?- obviously, sadly-

so why does Tompkins need this head-piece?- what's going on here?- there's a reason for everything...

Larry

[Foxie Loxie]

I would say at his age, let him do whatever HE is comfortable with. What matters is that he is adding to our base of knowledge.

[Builder]

Old men and their hair ... ask the future US president what's going on ;-)

[Billy]

Posted by Cardillac (here)
just as an aiside: as I work in the realm of the theater and can spot a wig on sight: why is William Tomkins wearing a primitive skull-cap with hair that isn't even glued on (look at the space between his skin and the hair piece)?!-

anyone not yet noticed he's wearing an extremely primitive head cover?- if so, why NOT!?-

am I the only member of this forum who has noticed this?- obviously, sadly-

so why does Tompkins need this head-piece?- what's going on here?- there's a reason for everything...

Larry

I would say that like myself everyone noticed the hair piece, i do agree someone could have gave him a heads up. being 93 yrs old and if it makes him feel better, it was not a topic worth discussing. Each to their own. Live and let live. What is worth discussing is the interesting information he shares.

[onawah]

I hope Tompkins will talk more about the plan which he says the Nordics are encouraging us to follow, which is to move to other planets which are safer than Earth, the Earth changes he foresees we are overdue for, if he thinks we would be safer from the Reptilians on other planets and if so, why, and leading from that question, if he thinks the Reptilians are losing ground on Earth.
And I hope that Robert Wood will come out soon with more info along the lines of pizzagate, and strike while the iron is hot.
I can understand Tompkins' feeling that it will shut down a lot of new comers to conspiracy theory with disbelief (or simply horror, which I think is even more likely), but somehow humanity has got to start dealing with this, and the information has got to get out.
My understanding about the Annunaki is that they were created by the Dracos because their humanoid/reptilian bodies are similar enough to the Draco bodies that Draco souls can easily incarnate into them, and they can live on Earth in Annunaki bodies.
I met an Annunaki several years ago who looked so human to me that the only tipoff were the eyes.
Her eyes were so distinct, like none I had ever seen before--it wasn't that they were slit or yellow or anything like that.
It was an essence that I was able to recognize because I had looked at ancient Sumerian art online a lot.
(You can really learn a lot about people by looking into their eyes!)
I wondered if she had incarnated here or arrived here in some other way, but my feeling was she had incarnated here.
She was very egocentric and obnoxious and she latched onto me right away from all the other women in the group at a women's retreat where I presented a workshop on living foods.
And she told me a story about how her boyfriend had told her that they were both Annunaki, and that he had followed her to Earth where she had come to try and escape him.
She asked me if I knew what that meant, because she didn't know what Annunaki meant.
I hadn't looked at her eyes closely before that, but I did after that, and concluded that she was making Contact with me intentionally, but masking it as something else for some reason.
I just advised her to read Sitchin's books, and she said she was just going to run away from her boyfriend (who she said was very controlling) and was going to move to NYC to become a supermodel!
I just said I thought she should go for it (rather facetiously at that point, since I think NYC would probably eat her up, like it does so many newcomers.)
Then she tried to read me and tap my energy.
But I was on to her by then, and had put up some pretty good barriers, so I don't think she got as much as she wanted.
I don't see that Annunaki essence in Obama's eyes, though perhaps it's there in the Bush's.
But they may have been incarnating here a lot longer than the woman I encountered.
Curiouser and curiouser!

edited 12/21/16 added " which he says" in the first sentence

[Satori]

The hair piece is obvious. I must confess that it did cause me to think about the character, and such, of a man, especially a man of 93, who would wear a hair piece. (I could use one, but never will. The people I know of who do are not of my mindset.) He is hiding his baldness and wants us to think he has a full head of hair when he does not. Is he hiding anything else with his words? What else does he want us to think is, but which is not? Obviously we cannot discount everything he says merely because of the rug on his head, but to many people a rug takes away from one's credibility and causes many people to think of the speaker's ego and not his message. Is that fair, or right? Maybe not. But it's human nature to do so.

[norman]

Perhaps he's just being cautious about how he's seen publicly. Most people here on this forum, myself included, hide our identities behind our avatars. We are not really doing it as comb-overs to sweeten our egos. We do it, I think, because we are wary of being too easily recognisable elsewhere. I sometimes wish I hadn't used my real name as my cyber identity. Not because I worry about the NSA knowing me, they do, and there's nothing I can do about that, even if I was using a made up name. No, it's because other people can do a bit of research and find me if they put a bit of effort into it.

Tompkins may well sit around the garden with his bald head, for I know. If he does, I'm sure he'll get quite a bit of comfort from the idea that the youtube public could walk right past him and not recognise him.

[onawah]

I don't think the rug is worthy of concern.
I wear a hat or a hoodie most of the time because my head and ears and neck get cold easily, and I know others who do the same.
Perhaps he wears a rug because his head gets cold easily or he just doesn't like the way he looks balding.
Men can be concerned about their appearance just as much as women.
And he obviously likes the ladies, so perhaps he thinks the rug makes him look more attractive.
Could we please get back to topic?

[waves]

I'll get back to topic. What is very suspicious to me is why over so many years that Mr. Tompkins has gravitated to so few interviewers with the bulk being such red flag characters - Rense, Sala, Cassidy plus Wilcock/Goode going out of their way to single him out and sidle up to him, also at top of the red flag list.

Something is not being said.

[onawah]

Kerry commented on this, saying that he had finally been given a green light to go ahead and disclose, and he seemed to concur.
I don't think he was willing to put himself or his family at risk, which is quite understandable.
Not everyone is, which is why it's so important when they are.

Posted by waves (here)
I'll get back to topic. What is very suspicious to me is why over so many years that Mr. Tompkins has gravitated to so few interviewers with the bulk being such red flag characters - Rense, Sala, Cassidy plus Wilcock/Goode going out of their way to single him out and sidle up to him, also at top of the red flag list.

Something is not being said.

[alexius]

It's obvious that there is something more to the/this story. Mr Thompkins created structures of illusion in the military and so on(if what he is sayin is true). Just to mention the Apollo program, the visit to our moon that was just a complete decoy from the real agenda. If i remember correctly, building bases on other planets was the real goal but it was stopped.

I get the feeling he is inviting me to investigate the good stuff by giving me some bread-crumbles to clean up on the way. Imho this inverview needs to be watched, watched again and rewatched after that. There are pieces missing that needs to be put together.

But hey.. That's just my thoughts. Anyone else that shares the same opinion, or nearly?

Hat on

Love and light <3

[barneythez]

Maybe if we sweet talk Bill, he could interview him as well and get all your questions answered. Ok, so I'm a dreamer.....
But when Bill and Kerry were together(ah, the good ole days), they were a great compliment to each other in as far as getting to what needed to be asked. I can't think of a better team.

[norman]

Bill Tompkins is probably only allowed to talk about old stuff that's not security critical. It would explain why they've wheeled out such an oldy for this.

[barneythez]

The older, the wiser.....

[East Sun]

I would not take him up on an offer to go to an Eden/Ideal Earth-like planet anywhere in outer space. You could end up a slave ....

But then, maybe not............

I noticed he referred to the U.S. as you when talking to others as if he was not American. Or maybe is an alien or something else. No one asked him.

BuT he is very knowledgeable, that's for sure.

I am reading his book, just started on it. Don't suppose I'll learn anything more from it than was mentioned in his interviews.

[waves]

Posted by onawah (here)
Kerry commented on this, saying that he had finally been given a green light to go ahead and disclose, and he seemed to concur.
I don't think he was willing to put himself or his family at risk, which is quite understandable.
Not everyone is, which is why it's so important when they are.

I think you missed my point. I didn't say or mean 'after' so many years, I said 'over'. I meant that since he started giving interviews which has been a few years now, he's somehow only gravitated nearly exclusively to this very suspicious handful of people. I'm saying it's not coincidence, it implies an unstated agenda, and it makes me pull back and not be to quick to give credibility.

[7alon]

Posted by onawah (here)
I don't think the rug is worthy of concern.
I wear a hat or a hoodie most of the time because my head and ears and neck get cold easily, and I know others who do the same.
Perhaps he wears a rug because his head gets cold easily or he just doesn't like the way he looks balding.
Men can be concerned about their appearance just as much as women.
And he obviously likes the ladies, so perhaps he thinks the rug makes him look more attractive.
Could we please get back to topic?

I was actually thinking exactly this ^

what would look stupider when trying to keep the heat inside your body, a 93 year old wearing a hoodie or hat everywhere?, or just popping a toupee, which he can wear no matter the situation?

Why did he seem to have so much trouble describing these reptilian beings? Any thoughts on that? I just found it odd.

[onawah]

I guess I'm still missing your point.
Please explain,if you don't mind, what gives you reason to suspect him because he has been giving interviews over a few years.
And who is the very suspicious handful of people you are referring to?

Posted by waves (here)

Posted by onawah (here)
Kerry commented on this, saying that he had finally been given a green light to go ahead and disclose, and he seemed to concur.
I don't think he was willing to put himself or his family at risk, which is quite understandable.
Not everyone is, which is why it's so important when they are.

I think you missed my point. I didn't say or mean 'after' so many years, I said 'over'. I meant that since he started giving interviews which has been a few years now, he's somehow only gravitated nearly exclusively to this very suspicious handful of people. I'm saying it's not coincidence, it implies an unstated agenda, and it makes me pull back and not be to quick to give credibility.