+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst 1 8
Results 141 to 148 of 148

Thread: 'Skyfish' of NASA tether incident Don Juan's 'mudshadows'?

  1. Link to Post #141
    United States Avalon Member DNA's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th May 2011
    Location
    S.W. Missouri
    Language
    English
    Age
    53
    Posts
    4,846
    Thanks
    36,403
    Thanked 30,446 times in 4,558 posts

    Default Re: 'Skyfish' of NASA tether incident Don Juan's 'mudshadows'?

    Quote Posted by shaberon (here)
    I've never been able to persuade myself that the tether swarm was some dust particles. It does seem likely that things like those and Mr. Constable's "critters" are simply some weird bio-forms. Slightly different than any astral "parasites" of humans, which I agree with the posts that the best defense is discipline.

    There are some amazing contributions on this thread, it really is worth the read. Feel free to ask questions I'll jump in and help where I can.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M8_ozoDNOBw

    Crrow777 has filmed these with his telescope in my opinion.


    Here is a picture taken by a professional photographer working with Wilheim Riech, it is quite amazing if real.
    There is a story that goes with it, apparently this being was seen by all who were in attendance. Reich was using an orgone contraption of some kind designed to attract the entity, and was so convinced it would show up that he had hired the well known professional photographer to take a picture if the thing should show up. It apparently did.
    I would love for an experiment like this to be performed at say Skinwalker Ranch, just imagine the sh!t that would show up...
    Especially if you had photographers using various specialized photography methods.







    Quote Willheim Reich suspected invisible creatures lived in the sky. In 1953 Reich enlisted the help of a photographer named Norman Leisting. Reich had Leisting's assistant raise an orgone charged rod into the air in hopes of attracting one of the invisible beings he believed existed. Within 5 seconds, a huge jelly fist like being attached itself to the rod. Becoming visible long enough for Leisting to capture it in a photograph. The screams and panic from Leisting's now running assistant are said to have caused the jelly fist to dissapear. Supposedly 12 additional people witnessed the spectacle. Reich & Leisting were so unnerved by the experiment they were said to have refused to discuss it. Leisting referred to Reich as "The devil himself" later in life.

  2. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DNA For This Post:

    Foxie Loxie (10th January 2017), shaberon (11th January 2017), Unicorn (10th January 2017)

  3. Link to Post #142
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2016
    Posts
    6,399
    Thanks
    32,622
    Thanked 36,022 times in 6,049 posts

    Default Re: 'Skyfish' of NASA tether incident Don Juan's 'mudshadows'?

    Hrm. Are you aware that if you google this photographer, that this forum is the only place he exists? As "Leistig", he is on a few other blog type things, but otherwise...a missing professional. I remember those pictures, and they do seem, an awful lot like jellyfish. So I am not sure if this is something Reich, himself actually said, or if it's been tacked onto him.

    The "tether", however, was twelve miles long. It is pretty hard for an untrained person to estimate depth of field, focal point, and that kind of stuff; I wouldn't be much good at it. Also, cameras based on electronic sensors do have a tendency to not react quickly when a moving object passes something else, so what's in front could appear behind, or vice-versa. Despite those points, it still seems that the "disks" seen with the tether were at various distances and trajectories, making it harder to dismiss as aberrations or dust.

    As I mentioned about the Brown Mountain Lights, those have been found to appear in the infra-red a few seconds before and after them being visible. I don't know if those are "bio" or "geo" or what they really could be. But as with *most* observations of things that blink into visibility, they're luminous. Almost nothing else resembles the "jelllyfish" description of something being totally invisible, and then manifesting an ordinary appearance and blinking out again. The "tether disks" were always ordinarily visible.

    So I'm not sure if I really have questions, as much as I'm panning for updates or verification. Maybe those things zipping by the moon could be taken as "tether disks part 2".

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to shaberon For This Post:

    DNA (11th January 2017)

  5. Link to Post #143
    United States Avalon Member DNA's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th May 2011
    Location
    S.W. Missouri
    Language
    English
    Age
    53
    Posts
    4,846
    Thanks
    36,403
    Thanked 30,446 times in 4,558 posts

    Default Re: 'Skyfish' of NASA tether incident Don Juan's 'mudshadows'?

    Quote Posted by shaberon (here)
    Hrm. Are you aware that if you google this photographer, that this forum is the only place he exists?
    Here is a little something found here. https://www.pinterest.com/pin/453104412482156093/


    And this was found here. https://maeclair.net/2014/12/22/myth...-by-mae-clair/
    Quote What interests me is an experiment he supposedly conducted in 1953 with the help of photographer Norman Leistig. Reich had Leistig’s assistant raise an “orgone-charged” rod into the air in the hopes of attracting one of the invisible beings he believed existed. Within five seconds a huge jellyfish-like creature attached itself to the rod, becoming visible long enough for Leistig to capture it in a photograph. But the terrified screams of Leistig’s assistant so repulsed the manifestation it faded from sight.
    Supposedly, twelve additional people witnessed the spectacle.
    Well I'm probably the person who put it on this forum, and I can assure you I didn't make his name up there has to be more info out there on him.
    As such it has to be out there somewhere, but as a sidenote while looking I found some more rather intriguing jellyfish ufo pics on pentirist I just put UFO Jellyfish into the search parameter.

    Quote Jellyfish UFO Over Mexico With Long Tentacles On March 2013"



    The Viborg Jellyfish





    This rainbow like jellyfish below is pretty crazy.
    Quote There’s not often a moment when we’re left utterly stumped but this is one of them.

    Dutch photographer Harry Perton was out wandering around sundown taking pictures when he suddenly noticed a flash through his eyepiece.

    Advertisement
    At first thinking it might have been a bolt of lightning the photographer went back home and checked the files on his camera.

    What he found truly shocked him. Unsure as to whether it was a UFO or something more meteorological the stunning image is actually not the first instance of a shape like this being seen.










    Here is a crop circle jellyfish for what it is worth





    The caption for this picture simply reads "Ghostly Jellyfish type UFO scares Chicago residents".







    Quote mountaintop yoga session has yielded a highly bizarre UFO photo, and the weird object looks more like an underwater creature than an iconic saucer.The odd image was captured on July 14th by a group of hikers who trekked to the top of Steven’s Trail in Auburn, California for a mid-day yoga session. After snapping a few images of poses on the rock face, a hiker noticed a strange anomaly hovering in the background of the photo, and the big flying jellyfish doesn’t look like any UFO we’ve ever seen reported before.
    Last edited by DNA; 11th January 2017 at 17:01.

  6. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to DNA For This Post:

    Mike (13th January 2017), shaberon (13th January 2017), sunwings (11th January 2017)

  7. Link to Post #144
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2016
    Posts
    6,399
    Thanks
    32,622
    Thanked 36,022 times in 6,049 posts

    Default Re: 'Skyfish' of NASA tether incident Don Juan's 'mudshadows'?

    No, I didn't think you made up the photographer--perhaps the "blogosphere" did.

    The Viborg one looks neat but could be a smoke ring:

    http://www.caelestia.be/viborg.html





    Reich's estate maintains a site http://www.wilhelmreichtrust.org/home.html which is very clear about the "book burning" that happened to him. Leisting or Leistig is nowhere on there, and the only jellyfish is in one of the (probably many) sections about orgasms. Nothing about either one in the 141 page archive of all of his personal property.

    Given the nature of "Cloudbusters", maybe it is a real picture of a smoke ring. Could still be in one of his books.

    Constable's "Critters" seem to be a little bit better documented although their appearance isn't as spectacular. If I remember rightly, he thought their actual body was something like twenty calcium ions. Those and the ones from the NASA video seem to be some kind of material body that responds in a voluntary manner to electricity or plasma.

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to shaberon For This Post:

    DNA (13th January 2017)

  9. Link to Post #145
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2016
    Posts
    6,399
    Thanks
    32,622
    Thanked 36,022 times in 6,049 posts

    Default Re: 'Skyfish' of NASA tether incident Don Juan's 'mudshadows'?

    I was going from ten year old memories on this so I freshened up a bit.

    I was not aware that Constable lived to a ripe old age and passed away just last year. He was against the "carcass in a tin can" type of ufo, and against psychic channeling. He was quite interested in the tether incident, and said the camera they used was sensitive to ultraviolet. I don't know if this is true. It would imply that "critters" and "disks" are two different kinds of things.

    He worked a lot with what he called ether, carrying the cloudbuster to a commercial level. In his observation, ether is the opposite of electricity: instead of flowing from high to low, it flows from low to high. Tornadoes and typhoons being high concentrations. He gave one example of mobile homes exploding when a tornado is near; the "metal box" was a low concentration, and flowed towards the tornado. Also the example of radar transformers on ships--high electric potential around 30,000 volts. The high concentration of ether in the typhoon would strike out and break the transformer. Similarly with ones on power poles when a thunderstorm is nearby, but no lightning hits it and it explodes.

    He also said it interferes with radioactivity and reasoned that the young earth was more "alive"--had an overall higher concentration of ether--it messed with radioactive decay. Hence carbon dating and other similar methods became less accurate looking back over longer periods of time into the past.

    So perhaps if critters are attracted to electricity, they are repelled by ether, which is why he looked for them in the desert.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to shaberon For This Post:

    DNA (15th January 2017), ThePythonicCow (20th January 2017)

  11. Link to Post #146
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2016
    Posts
    6,399
    Thanks
    32,622
    Thanked 36,022 times in 6,049 posts

    Default Re: 'Skyfish' of NASA tether incident Don Juan's 'mudshadows'?

    On a quick look, I can't tell why Mr. Constable would say NASA was using ultraviolet photography. On that mission they say they used a "low light level television camera", which does not do ultraviolet, but it does capture near-infrared up to about 1.1 microns wavelength. By comparison, most "strictly" infrared photography would start at 3 microns, which is a considerable difference. I might be missing something, but this suggests the "disks" were either plainly visible, or if not, they were very cold. Presumably, the same thing that would be warm in the Mojave Desert would be rather chilly at the top of the atmosphere, if the "critters" and "disks" are the same or similar.

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to shaberon For This Post:

    DNA (20th January 2017)

  13. Link to Post #147
    United States Avalon Member DNA's Avatar
    Join Date
    8th May 2011
    Location
    S.W. Missouri
    Language
    English
    Age
    53
    Posts
    4,846
    Thanks
    36,403
    Thanked 30,446 times in 4,558 posts

    Default Re: 'Skyfish' of NASA tether incident Don Juan's 'mudshadows'?

    Quote Posted by shaberon (here)
    On a quick look, I can't tell why Mr. Constable would say NASA was using ultraviolet photography. On that mission they say they used a "low light level television camera", which does not do ultraviolet, but it does capture near-infrared up to about 1.1 microns wavelength. By comparison, most "strictly" infrared photography would start at 3 microns, which is a considerable difference. I might be missing something, but this suggests the "disks" were either plainly visible, or if not, they were very cold. Presumably, the same thing that would be warm in the Mojave Desert would be rather chilly at the top of the atmosphere, if the "critters" and "disks" are the same or similar.

    From memory I remember Mr. Constable stating that he used a infra-red filter/lens on his 35mm to capture photos of the sky critters. The video below I can't vouch for but they state they are using infra-red on a digital video camera and they seem to be capturing some pretty amazing stuff.


    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7TONwh_A94



  14. The Following User Says Thank You to DNA For This Post:

    shaberon (20th January 2017)

  15. Link to Post #148
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    1st April 2016
    Posts
    6,399
    Thanks
    32,622
    Thanked 36,022 times in 6,049 posts

    Default Re: 'Skyfish' of NASA tether incident Don Juan's 'mudshadows'?

    Yes, that's so. In general, infrared and near ultraviolet photography is not hard to do. Compared along with what was found at Brown Mountain, I'm pretty sure there's infrared will o wisps, how much of it could be geoform versus a bioform, is kind of hard to say. I'm prone to say the visible will o wisps, foo fighters, etc., are simply the plasma frenzy stage of these things, similarly to how the visible part of a lightning bolt is plasma. Ball lightning, St. Elmo's fire; maybe just temporarily visible bodies of things that keep going. Or maybe it has a very brief lifespan and goes out like a flame and that's it. Lifespan from almost instant to a million years perhaps.

    That leaves me wondering if there could really be anything ultraviolet that wouldn't be found by other means. I mean, we know the sun is there, I hope, and UV can make certain things glow, but in the most extreme case, it's things we could find in a microscope. However vacuum ultraviolet and the higher energy waves x and gamma cannot pass the atmosphere--sources for this light are very dim anyway, considering this spectrum scale of the Crab Nebula:



    On that, a gamma ray would be one pixel. There simply are almost no gamma rays.

    However, this was recently found at the core of the galaxy like so:



    My only guess is that the vacuum frequencies might be able to illuminate a Bose-Einstein Condensate. Not something I can see any reason to go flittering around the earth.

    If I had that kind of camera set-up, I'd probably try to see how the stuff responded to spark plugs and a plasma ball, lasers and radio sources.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to shaberon For This Post:

    DNA (20th January 2017)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst 1 8

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts