Trump: The Great American Reset

[turiya]

Hypocrisy of the Left...

Senator Claire McCaskell
calls for Jeff Sessions to resign...


_________________________________

Senator Claire McCaskell claims
that she never met with a Russian Ambassador


_________________________________

2012 Claire McCaskell met with Russian
Ambassador Sergey Kislyak

Old photos of Russian Amb. Sergey Kislyak w/ senators, including Reed (D), Blunt (R), Landrieu (D), Wicker (R), McCaskill (D)


_________________________________

2015 Senator Claire McCaskell tweet boasting that she
will meet with British, Russian & German Ambassadors...



_________________________________

Brit Hume tweets the following:


_________________________________

Senator McCaskill Met w/ Russian Ambassador
(Published March 04, 2017)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=GIfyNLWtUVA

[turiya]

Stealth Sanctuary to Avoid Losing Federal Funds,
Police Chief Pens Spanish Letter Assuring Illegal Aliens

MARCH 02, 2017


Windsor’s police chief, Carlos G. Basurto

The chief of police in an upscale northern California town has issued a letter in Spanish to illegal immigrants in his city assuring them that they’re safe from deportation because his agency “will not engage in federal immigration enforcement activities.” Police in Windsor, which is situated about 60 miles north of San Francisco, will not arrest or detain any person for immigration violations or conduct “sweeps” to locate those “illegally present in the United States,” the letter states.

Windsor’s police chief, Carlos G. Basurto, reveals in the letter that he is the grandson of illegal immigrants and knows that an overwhelmingly large percentage of illegal aliens are good, decent and hard-working.

“I am committed to provide them and all other segments of our community with a safe and healthy community for all to enjoy and prosper and to have a feeling of equality,” the chief writes to illegal aliens in his municipality of about 28,000 residents.

Basurto concedes that in his 28 years in law enforcement he’s seen illegal immigrants who are violent gang members, drug dealers, murderers, rapists, human traffickers and child abusers.

“To think that this does not exist and that all immigrants are good people, is to be either naïve, uninformed or in denial,” the chief writes, confirming that “there is a segment committed to violence, drugs and domestic terrorism.”

With that said, the top law enforcement official in this California town vows to protect illegal aliens from federal authorities, even those with minor offenses. “Our community involves and includes everyone,” Chief Basurto writes. “I don’t want anyone, and I emphasize anyone, to be afraid to call upon us for assistance, information, advice or to report any crime or issue in our town.” The reassurances continue;

“If you are an undocumented immigrant in the Town of Windsor, you do not need to fear the officers of the Windsor Police Department nor assume that they have any reason to bother you, detain you or arrest you for simply being undocumented. Your immigration status is completely irrelevant to us.” He adds that his agency collaborates with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to apprehend “serious or violent criminals” under the condition that ICE refrain from arresting any person based immigration status or low-level offenses.

Deep in the three-page letter the chief acknowledges that illegal entry to the United States is against the law, but his personal convictions evidently allow him to look the other way. His grandparents came from Mexico and worked in the fields and ranches of California and when he was in junior high he and his brother worked in the prune fields to earn money for school clothes. This taught Basurto to appreciate immigrant workers.

“We also knew that most, if not all of these people, emigrated here from other countries to do this work, for little pay, in hopes of making a better life for themselves and their families,” the chief writes. “In essence, I can relate to these people, because like many of us in this town, we are these people.”

Guaranteeing illegal aliens that they’ll be shielded from federal authorities technically constitutes a sanctuary city, but Windsor officials say this could bring consequences under the new administration so they’re keeping it quiet. A local Spanish newspaper article reports that town manager Linda Kelly, a seasoned government official, has recommended that Windsor keep its sanctuary practices under the radar because President Donald Trump has threatened to cut federal funds to sanctuary cities. Instead, Windsor will adopt a resolution that omits the word sanctuary, instead declaring the town to be a united community that values diversity and the contributions of all residents.

Judicial Watch

[A Voice from the Mountains]

Hopefully enough Californian leaders will come down in scandals that they won't be organized enough to mount any kind of resistance when we actually start enforcing our laws for a change.

The United States is a sovereign nation, not a global charity.

[BMJ]

The Deep State War on Trump

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NBTMKLmdpho

Published on 3 Mar 2017

The real story behind the Russia hysteria.

[Helene West]

I have changed my position from 2 days ago on wanting Sessions to recuse himself.

At first I was so angry at him for leaving out whatever his conversations with rthe uskies was about to the panel. I believe they were innocent and business as usual but he should have known he'd be outed for the slightest thing given the environment.

But now that it's apparent that we have a criminal witch hunt going on I see I was mistaken in hoping Sessions would recuse himself thinking it would shut them up and give them some satisfaction and spare us listening to them go on and on. But I was wrong. It now appears he should have come out swinging.
From this point on everyone in the trump administration should just come out swinging.

[ThePythonicCow]

The campaign to polarize us is working well, as might be expected.

"If you can keep your head when all about you. Are losing theirs ..." -- Rudyard Kipling's poem "If".

[norman]

Posted by BMJ (here)
The Deep State War on Trump

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NBTMKLmdpho

Published on 3 Mar 2017

The real story behind the Russia hysteria.

I just tried to send a link for this video to an old friend. within seconds I got a bounce notification.

The response from the remote server was:

552 Spam Message Rejected

I've NEVER had such a notification before. Spam is Spam. It goes into someone's spam folder. It DOES NOT get bounced, as if undeliverable.

As the email account I sent it from is itself google, I even wonder if the notification is a lie and that they themselves filtered it out for rejection.

[Fellow Aspirant]

Works for me.

Fixed?

B

[Fellow Aspirant]

"But now that it's apparent that we have a criminal witch hunt going on" ...

On what basis is any of the investigation "criminal"?

And how is it a "witch hunt"?

I saw the guy lie under oath to a senate hearing.

B.

[turiya]

Posted by Fellow Aspirant (here)
I saw the guy lie under oath to a senate hearing.
B.

Oh, did you really?

What Is To Be Done?
— Paul Craig Roberts
March 3, 2017 | Categories: Articles & Columns

The question in the title is V.I. Lenin’s question. His answer was to create a revolutionary “vanguard” to spread revolutionary ideas among the workers, the economic class that Karl Marx had declared to be the class rising to the ascendency of political power. Finally, democracy, frustrated by upper class interests in its earlier manifestations, would become reality. The workers would rule.

Given the presence of evil and human failing, it did not work out in that way. But Lenin’s question remains a valid one. Americans whose economic life and prospects for their children have been destroyed by the offshoring of American manufacturing and tradable professional skills jobs, such as software engineering, answered the question by electing Donald Trump.

The Americans, dispossessed by the offshoring corporations, elected Trump, because Trump was the only American running for a political office who called attention to the problem and declared his intention to fix it.

By standing up for Americans, Trump alienated the global corporations, their executives and shareholders, all of whom benefit from stealing the economic life of Americans and producing abroad where labor and regulatory costs are lower. Neoliberal junk economists describe this labor arbitrage, which reduces the real incomes of the American labor force, as the beneficial working of free trade.

These offshoring firms not only have destroyed the economic prospects of millions of Americans, but also have destroyed the payroll tax base of Social Security and Medicare, and the tax base of local and state governments, with the consequence that numerous pension systems are on the verge of failure. The New York Teamsters Road Carriers Local 707 Pension Fund has just failed. This failure, experts predict, is the beginning of a tsunami that will spread into municipal and state pension systems.

When you add up the external costs of jobs offshoring that are imposed on Americans, the costs far exceed the value of the profits that flow to the One Percent. Clearly, this is an intolerable situation.

Dispossessed Americans rose up. They ignored the presstitute media, or perhaps were driven to support Trump by the hostility of the media. Trump was elected by dispossessed America, by the working class.

The working class is out of favor with the elite liberal/progressive/left which abhors the working class as racist, misogynist, homophobic, gun nuts who oppose transgendered toilet facilities. Thus, the working class, and their chosen representative, Donald Trump, are under full assault by the presstitutes. “Trump Must Go” is their slogan.

And well he might. Trump, in a fit of stupidity, dismissed his National Security Advisor, Gen. Flynn, because Flynn did what he should have done and spoke with the Russian ambassador in order to avoid a Russian response to Obama’s provocation of expelling Russian diplomats at Christmas.

Russians have been demonized and ascribed demonic powers. If you speak to a Russian, you fall under suspicion and become a traitor to your country. This is the story according to the CIA, the Democratic Party, the military/security complex, and the presstitute media.

Once Trump put Flynn’s blood in the water, he set the situation for the sacrifice of other of his appointees, ending with himself. At the present time, “the Russian connection” black mark is operating against Trump’s Attorney General, Jeff Sessions. If Sessions falls, Trump is next.

Let’s be clear. As a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Sessions met with the Russian ambassador, just as he met with a number of other countries’ ambassadors. There is nothing unusual or surprising about a US senator meeting with foreign diplomatic representatives.

Those who accuse Sessions of lying are misrepresenting the facts. Sessions met with ambassadors in his capacity as a US Senator, not in his capacity as a Trump representative. As a former US Senate staffer, I can attest that it is perfectly normal for US Senators to meet with diplomats. John McCain and Lindsey Graham even fly to the Middle East to meet with terrorists.

Despite the facts, the Washington Post, New York Times, CNN and all the rest of the CIA’s media whores are consciously and intentionally misrepresenting the facts. Americans do not need any more evidence that the entirety of the American media is totally devoid of integrity and respect for truth. The American media is a collection of whores who lie for a living. The presstitutes are despicable, the scum of the earth.

The real question is how has contact with Russian government officials become criminalized, grounds for removing a National Security Adviser, an Attorney General, and impeaching a President himself. President John F. Kennedy had ongoing contact with Khrushchev, the head of the Soviet government, in order to resolve the Cuban/Turkish missile crisis without nuclear war. President Nixon had ongoing contact with the Russians in order to achieve SALT I and the anti-ballistic missile treaty. President Carter had ongoing contact with Russians in order to achieve SALT II. President Reagan worked with the Russian leader in order to end the Cold War. I know. I was there.

But if President Trump wants to defuse the extremely dangerous tensions that the reckless Clinton, George W. Bush, and Obama regimes have resurrected with a powerful thermo-nuclear state that only wants peace with the US, President Trump and any of his appointees who spoke to a Russian are unfit for office! This madness is the position of the idiot liberal/progressive/left, the CIA, the Democratic Party, the right-wing morons of the Republican Party such as Lindsey Graham and John McCain, and the two-bit whores that comprise the Western media.

Dear reader, ask yourself, how did communications with Russians in the interest of peace and the reduction of tensions become a criminal act? Have laws been passed that it is forbidden for US officials to speak with Russian officials? Are you so utterly stupid that a presstitute media that has never in your entire life told you anything that was truthful can convince you that those who seek to avoid a conflict between thermo-nuclear powers are “Russian agents”?

I have no doubt that the vast bulk of Western populations are insouciant. But if there is no intelligence and awareness left anywhere in the population, and most certainly there is none whatsoever in the governments of the West or in the Western media or the Identity Politics of the liberal/progressive/left, then don’t expect to be alive much longer.

The entirety of the world has been put on the knife edge of existence by the arrogance, stupidity, and hubris of the neoconservative pursuit of American world hegemony. The neoconservative ideology is perfect cover for the material interest of the military/security Deep State that is driving the world to destruction.

Paul Craig Roberts

[Chester]

The post FA referred to -

Posted by Helene West (here)
I have changed my position from 2 days ago on wanting Sessions to recuse himself.

At first I was so angry at him for leaving out whatever his conversations with the ruskies was about to the panel. I believe they were innocent and business as usual but he should have known he'd be outed for the slightest thing given the environment.

But now that it's apparent that we have a criminal witch hunt going on I see I was mistaken in hoping Sessions would recuse himself thinking it would shut them up and give them some satisfaction and spare us listening to them go on and on. But I was wrong. It now appears he should have come out swinging.
From this point on everyone in the trump administration should just come out swinging.

and now FA's post, responded to in snippets.

Posted by Fellow Aspirant (here)
"But now that it's apparent that we have a criminal witch hunt going on" ...

On what basis is any of the investigation "criminal"?

I am surprised you are asking this question considering your last statement -

Posted by Fellow Aspirant (here)
I saw the guy lie under oath to a senate hearing.

I will deal with the question, "And how is it a "witch hunt"?" after making this first point.

If one believes this last statement ("I saw the guy lie under oath to a senate hearing"), surely one understands that if this would be true (that "the guy" lied under oath), then one would surely also know that to do so would be perjury which is a criminal offense...

...and so we have the following found here -
an On Air conversation between ABC anchor, David Muir and ABC reporter, Mary Bruce during the National News broadcast at 6PM Eastern on March 2, 2017 -

MUIR: Democrats are saying they’re not going to give up this fight, they’re going to try to pressure Sessions to resign, even calling for a criminal investigation tonight?

BRUCE: Yeah David, Democrats say this is now a question of perjury, and a group of House Democrats have sent a letter to the FBI director demanding an immediate criminal investigation. Some Democrats even want to see if Sessions will come back here to the hill to testify again.

Criminal investigations can lead to "criminal charges."

Posted by Fellow Aspirant (here)
I saw the guy lie under oath to a senate hearing.

If one "saw" a video feed of "the guy" testifying before the Senate and drew a conclusion that "the guy" lied, I would make odds very high that only one of the two following possibilities would also be correct -

One, that the viewer saw an MSM or left leaning media outlet present a brief slice of that lengthy hearing where what was provided was either "setup" by the "unbiased" news presenter and/or commented upon afterward by the "unbiased" news presenter to create the "belief" in as many viewers as possible that Sessions lied.

Two, that the viewer had actually taken the time to watch a much larger portion of that hearing (if not all)... maybe happened to watch it live, yet, due to their own bias, bolstered by reports they had later seen, decided to jump on the "he was lying" bandwagon because that is what they want to believe anyways.

From this article here -

The Washington Post reports that Attorney General Jeff Sessions had contact twice with the Russian ambassador during the campaign — once at a Heritage Foundation event and once at a meeting in Sessions’s Senate office. The Post suggests that the two meetings contradict Sessions’s testimony at his confirmation hearings that he had no contacts with the Russians, though in context (not presented by the Post) it was clear he meant in his capacity as a campaign surrogate, and that he was responding to claims in the “dossier” of ongoing contacts.

I believe myself to be a reasonably intelligent and fair minded individual. I may be wrong... but having looked carefully at the matter, especially a large segment of the testimony that led up to and included Sessions response to Franken. It is quite obvious that Sessions' response was in the context suggested in Mark Levin's article on Breitbart and in that case was honest and accurate.

Posted by Fellow Aspirant (here)
And how is it a "witch hunt"?

My question is... How is it anything but a witch hunt?

When matters such as this are so obviously meant to achieve political victories for the terminally ill "dems" or call it "the disheveled left," especially the far left [and I add the following for those who have begun to understand the actual bigger picture - the wounded 'deep state' which is in large part responsible for creating the distraction of the left/right (dems/repubs) dichotomy]... how is it possible that folks, regardless of their political leanings and regardless of what they have opened themselves up to considering is possible with regards to matters more covert, are not asking the real question...

Why are we all being so clearly manipulated?

Here is another honest review of what actually occurred which depicts honestly... yes, I have used this word twice... precisely how Sessions responses should be viewed by fair minded individuals following these matters -

In Context: What Jeff Sessions told Al Franken about meeting Russian officials

[turiya]

X22 Report News Flash....

The Deep State Is Positioning Itself,
Something Big Is About To Unfold
Episode 1218b
(Published on Mar 2, 2017)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=fjRCZ09ixOs

__________________________

Busted!!!! The Entire Deep State
Russian Propaganda Is Falling Apart
(Published on Mar 5, 2017)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=So3fq35-kok

__________________________

The Tables Were Just Turned On Obama And
The Deep State With This Simple Maneuver
Episode 1220
(Published on Mar 5, 2017)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=qax7NiYewq4

__________________________

Obama Slams "False" Trump Accusation, Says "Never Ordered" Wiretapping


"A cardinal rule of the Obama Administration was that no White House official ever interfered with any independent investigation led by the DOJ. As part of that practice, neither President Obama nor any White House official ever ordered surveillance on any U.S. citizen. Any suggestion otherwise is simply false."

• Mar 4, 2017 8:11 PM

Obama Advisor Rhodes Is Wrong: The President Can Order A Wiretap, And Why Trump May Have The Last Laugh

• Mar 4, 2017 11:35 PM

White House Demands Congressional Probe Whether Obama Ordered Wiretaps


"President Trump is requesting that as part of their investigation into Russian activity, the congressional intelligence committees exercise their oversight authority to determine whether executive branch investigative powers were abused in 2016." - Sean Spicer

• Mar 5, 2017 9:19 AM

James Clapper Denies Obama Wiretapped Trump


The former Director of National Intelligence under the Obama administration, James Clapper, denied there was a secret court order for surveillance at Trump Tower. Speaking on NBC's Meet The Press, Clapper said that in the national intelligence activity he oversaw, "there was no such wiretap activity mounted against the president, the president-elect at the time, as a candidate or against his campaign."

For the time being, it's Clapper words versus that of Trump. Should Trump persist with his demand for a Congressional probe into Obama's alleged wiretapping, it is almost certain that Clapper will once again be called in to testify. It is unknown if he will again commit perjury and lie [again] to Congress.

• Mar 5, 2017 11:14 AM

Former Bush AG Confirms "Trump Probably Right About Surveillance"


Following Obama's quasi-denial, Clapper's outright denial, Adam Schiff's "Breitbart-based wiretap conspiracy" charges, and Mark Warner's "reckless" perspective on Trump's 'wiretap' accusations, none other than former George W. Bush Attorney General Michael Mukasey has come to the president's defense, explaining that Trump is likely correct that there was surveillance on Trump Tower for intelligence purposes.

• Mar 5, 2017 12:25 PM

.

[norman]

Posted by Fellow Aspirant (here)
Works for me.

Fixed?

B

You didn't understand what I said. I didn't say the link to play it doesn't work.

[Helene West]

Apologies that I don't have time to check all the other trump threads so I don't know if today's Greg Hunter interview with Cliff High was posted. Here it is:
https://youtu.be/SXFJUAf9afA

It's good. Cliff sees Trump surviving all this crap, he calls Trump a "good surfer" who will surf over much of what's going on.

Also I just want to enter a personal note here - I think Fellow Aspirant's question above may be directed to me as I referred to what trump is being subjected to as a criminal witchhunt. I feel it is very important for those who don't want to be slaves of the Deep State to support the president. Whether you like him or not, if you have awareness of how the western world is ruled, supporting him is a pushback (Not a Solution or Cure-All), but a pushback to the Deep State. So just speaking for myself going forward I will not respond to anti-trumpers. I believe what is going on is too important for me to feed them. There's plenty of places for them to go and get their jollies.
I would also suggest if you belong to twitter or reddit, etc. just put out an occasional tweet to Support the President or counter the Witch Hunt or whatever facsimile... Let it resonate positively through cyberspace. thx

[turiya]

No need to apologize, Helene. I did happen to post it on the other thread. And, its good of you to have a link to the video here. Clif High offers some upbeat forsight moving forward, which I am glad to hear him say.

I really think these power elite are running on empty. Just hope Trump can keep his family, and himself, well protected.

Here's an RT video with an ex-CIA, Larry Johnson, who gives his view of what is going down...

‘DC insiders seek to defeat Donald Trump
ex-CIA agent'
(Published on Mar 5, 2017)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=OhkcU1Ls0fs

[Fellow Aspirant]

Hi Sam

First, about ...

and now FA's post, responded to in snippets.

Quote Posted by Fellow Aspirant (here)
"But now that it's apparent that we have a criminal witch hunt going on" ...

On what basis is any of the investigation "criminal"?

I was referring to the "witch hunt"/investigation as being characterized as "criminal". If there is illegal communication going on (or was), then an investigation of same should not be regarded as criminal. It's part of a legal process and therefore is not criminal. If one wants to regard what CNN is doing to the Trump presidency as a "witch hunt", then fair enough. The agenda of the CNN organization is to destroy Trump in any way possible, and they use some very slick spokespeople in their campaign. But while the witch hunt may be abominable, neither is it criminal.

That said, I must admit to having overstated the issue of "the guy" lieing to congress. In my deeper examination of the Sessions session with Franken (thanks to you and several other online sources), there is more than enough wiggle room for him to avoid the charge of perjury. The timing of his meetings with the Russian ambassador were far enough in advance of his becoming a "surrogate" within the Trump camp that he was, strictly speaking, telling the truth. That's why he won't be charged.

So, I stand corrected. Mea culpa.

Now, if I could find my sword somewhere around here in this terrible mess I call a home, I would do the honourable thing and promptly fall on it.
I was sure I had left it right here ...

I'll have to get back to you.

Cheers,

Brian

[turiya]

Alex advises Trump to set up 'Fireside Chats' as a way to speak to the public & by-pass the MSM...

BREAKING News! Coup Against
President Trump Now Taking Place Sunday
(Published on Mar 5, 2017)

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=lZ4KImtCfOk

[Chester]

Posted by Fellow Aspirant (here)
Hi Sam

First, about ...

and now FA's post, responded to in snippets.

Quote Posted by Fellow Aspirant (here)
"But now that it's apparent that we have a criminal witch hunt going on" ...

On what basis is any of the investigation "criminal"?

I was referring to the "witch hunt"/investigation as being characterized as "criminal". If there is illegal communication going on (or was), then an investigation of same should not be regarded as criminal. It's part of a legal process and therefore is not criminal. If one wants to regard what CNN is doing to the Trump presidency as a "witch hunt", then fair enough. The agenda of the CNN organization is to destroy Trump in any way possible, and they use some very slick spokespeople in their campaign. But while the witch hunt may be abominable, neither is it criminal.

That said, I must admit to having overstated the issue of "the guy" lieing to congress. In my deeper examination of the Sessions session with Franken (thanks to you and several other online sources), there is more than enough wiggle room for him to avoid the charge of perjury. The timing of his meetings with the Russian ambassador were far enough in advance of his becoming a "surrogate" within the Trump camp that he was, strictly speaking, telling the truth. That's why he won't be charged.

So, I stand corrected. Mea culpa.

Now, if I could find my sword somewhere around here in this terrible mess I call a home, I would do the honourable thing and promptly fall on it.
I was sure I had left it right here ...

I'll have to get back to you.

Cheers,

Brian

ahhhh... and just like my perception that Sessions answered the question honestly based on his understanding of the question with regards to its context, I also may have made the same error in interpreting what Helene West was saying with regards to "criminal witch hunt." Thanks for clarifying that and I can indeed see that your interpretation is surely understandable and in fact, now... I am wondering and thus asking Helene West to perhaps clarify which of the two may be what she wanted to convey or if perhaps there may be a third possibility.

Apologies for slight derailment, turiya, but what we are experiencing here is actually a demonstration of what folks can do when they may experience differences... work it out through honest, goal-oriented (resolution focused) peaceful discourse.

[turiya]

Posted by Sam Hunter (here)
Apologies for slight derailment, turiya, but what we are experiencing here is actually a demonstration of what folks can do when they may experience differences... work it out through honest, goal-oriented (resolution focused) peaceful discourse.

I do not have a problem with it.

Mark Levin Issues Open Letter To CNN's Brian Stetler: "You Are Thoroughly Dishonest"


"Your ad hominem attacks about "right wing" radio host and conspiracy theory stuff ... incredible... Your lack of curiosity and dishonesty about such matters and in dealing with me demean you and your profession..."

• Mar 6, 2017 1:01 PM

Trump Does Not Accept Comey's Wiretap Denial: White House


Having thrown the Justice Department under the bus yesterday, it appears the FBI Director has not managed to pass the hot potato of blame/responsibility for Trump's wiretap accusations. As The Hill reports, a White House spokeswoman on Monday said she "doesn't think" Trump accepts Comey's denial of the president's claims.

• Mar 6, 2017 9:12 AM

Schumer Demands "Immediate" Probe Of Political Interference Into Trump-Russia Investigation


In what seems like yet another desperate act by the Democrats, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is now calling for an "immediate" investigation by the Justice Department's independent watchdog into federal probes of communication between Donald Trump’s team and Russian officials during the 2016 campaign.

• Mar 6, 2017 1:20 PM

Trump Signs Revised Travel Ban, Exempts Iraq


Homeland Security's Secretary Kelly, Secretary of State Tillerson, and AG Sessions will be unveiling the Trump administration's all new and improved immigration plan to replace its previous executive order that was suspended by the courts.

• Mar 6, 2017 12:35 PM

"Russian Hackers" Reemerge, Said To Demand Bitcoin Ransoms From Liberal Groups


In the latest apparent FBI leak, Bloomberg reports that at least 12 left-leaning political organizations in the U.S. have been targeted by Russian hackers demanding "hush money" to keep their private emails confidential.

• Mar 6, 2017 9:31 AM

[norman]

Posted by norman (here)

Posted by BMJ (here)
The Deep State War on Trump

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NBTMKLmdpho

Published on 3 Mar 2017

The real story behind the Russia hysteria.

I just tried to send a link for this video to an old friend. within seconds I got a bounce notification.

The response from the remote server was:

552 Spam Message Rejected

I've NEVER had such a notification before. Spam is Spam. It goes into someone's spam folder. It DOES NOT get bounced, as if undeliverable.

As the email account I sent it from is itself google, I even wonder if the notification is a lie and that they themselves filtered it out for rejection.

Paul Watson on Infowars has just confirmed that there is a new "SPAM" categisation for articles and videos that expose the lies or tell the truth.

Alex, on the foolish side of things immediately said "so there you go listeners, share all the links with everyone you know"....

Alex, you ninkumpoop, That's the whole point !. The links are now SPAM!.

Email accounts will either dump them in the spam bin or reject them completely ( as happened to me ).