Project Camelot Interviews Simon Parkes | Changing Our World

[onawah]

“The only man I know who behaves sensibly is my tailor; he takes my measurements anew each time he sees me. The rest go on with their old measurements and expect me to fit them.”
― George Bernard Shaw, Man and Superman

[AutumnW]

Posted by bettye198 (here)
I think the whole Simon being rejected had to happen before I logged onto Avalon again. I just do not remember anything about remote viewing the Vatican. It may have happened in the distant past.
My husband and I are prolific in studying various speakers in professional interviews and we enjoyed this last interview with Simon with Kerry. I do not judge I just glean and observe and listen and analyze privately. For us, he presented very good information of which we are interested in. Of which we already resonated with and had a belief in. I care not that there is a group here at Avalon that casts a NO vote. There are a lot of members here and we all have different tastes. Would hope that those of us who agree with something discredited by some,are not made to feel intimidated by our choices. I would love to see more of letting others like/dislike and grow in their own learning. That is what makes a great forum. I left a forum that chastised with discredit and cynicism. I suspect others here may have had that experience.

Personally, I listen for my own wealth of info and discern at my own level of wisdom and understanding regardless what others may think. I encourage people to post to engage in discussion, discourse, not judgment.
Just saying.

Honest discussion isn't possible with people who 'want to believe,' regardless of where the evidence leads. Simon Parkes is a typical blame deflecting conman, who's nasty to truth seekers who go to him for help.

[Shannon]

Posted by AutumnW (here)

Posted by bettye198 (here)
I think the whole Simon being rejected had to happen before I logged onto Avalon again. I just do not remember anything about remote viewing the Vatican. It may have happened in the distant past.
My husband and I are prolific in studying various speakers in professional interviews and we enjoyed this last interview with Simon with Kerry. I do not judge I just glean and observe and listen and analyze privately. For us, he presented very good information of which we are interested in. Of which we already resonated with and had a belief in. I care not that there is a group here at Avalon that casts a NO vote. There are a lot of members here and we all have different tastes. Would hope that those of us who agree with something discredited by some,are not made to feel intimidated by our choices. I would love to see more of letting others like/dislike and grow in their own learning. That is what makes a great forum. I left a forum that chastised with discredit and cynicism. I suspect others here may have had that experience.

Personally, I listen for my own wealth of info and discern at my own level of wisdom and understanding regardless what others may think. I encourage people to post to engage in discussion, discourse, not judgment.
Just saying.

Honest discussion isn't possible with people who 'want to believe,' regardless of where the evidence leads. Simon Parkes is a typical blame deflecting conman, who's nasty to truth seekers who go to him for help.

Bette said "I care not that there is a group here at Avalon that casts a NO vote. There are a lot of members here and we all have different tastes. Would hope that those of us who agree with something discredited by some,are not made to feel intimidated by our choices. "

It's not a "group" that is casting a no vote. Project Avalon which is owned by Bill Ryan does not support Simon parkes. This has nothing to do with votes, and yes, no one should be made to felt intimidated but being willfully ignorant to the behavior of this man will do no one any favors.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Shannon (here)
Project Avalon which is owned by Bill Ryan does not support Simon Parkes. This has nothing to do with votes, and yes, no one should be made to felt intimidated but being willfully ignorant to the behavior of this man will do no one any favors.

That might need a bit of clarification! It could easily be assumed from Shan's reply that this is somehow a policy determined by myself.

Absolutely not. I've never told anyone what to think, least of all anyone in the mods team. They'll all confirm that.

I'd like to think that all members of the forum are data-driven rather than belief-driven. But to be data-driven, one has to know the data.

Here's data:

• Our experience with Simon Parkes as a counselor

• Simon Parkes: Questions of integrity and credibility

None of that is about Simon's information. That's for individuals to evaluate and decide.

It's about the way Simon interacts with others, privately. We had a duty to inform and protect those who consulted him for counseling. To understand more, please read the two threads.

[bettye198]

Thank you for clarifying what needed to be said Bill. The No vote was a phrase of reference, not an actual vote. I would hope the readers understood that.
Information from Simon was strictly about what he knows behind the scenes. Not at all about what he chooses to do to remedy programmed individuals or how he counsels. It appears that his info seen by members is colored by what he does to deprogram, exorcise cultish mind controlled behavior. That is not my interest nor do I advocate that. My hope is that we do not throw the baby out with the bath water every time we see or hear a piece of what does not resonate with us. Anyway, it is apparent he left a stigma on the forum that cannot be erased. So be it. But there are others who also have apparently left a stain and those interviewees have also been discredited. So what is the list? Be nice to know. Not that it determines who or what I wish to learn from. But it may keep the written disreputes at bay from what I may post.

[TrumanCash]

As I indicated in a previous post it is not my intention to comment on Simon Parkes personally, but to expose the Mantids and their co-conspirators, the Annunaki, Grays and Reptilians. That is my focus due to my own extensive experience with Mantids, Grays and the Annunaki.

At 19:42 in the first video Simon says: "Anything that's got any ounce of spirituality to it wishes to evolve. And the Mantids certainly wish to evolve....But the Mantids have aligned themselves as an independent group who wish to see mankind evolve."

First of all, it has been suggested that my Mantids are not the same as Simon's Mantids. That assumption does not hold water because Simon has indicated that his knowledge of Mantids comes only from the Mantids he is associated with and not other groups of Mantids.

Simon has already revealed that his Mantids are directly involved with abducting Earth humans. Kidnapping is not just considered unethical on Earth; it violates free will and the universal law of consent which I discussed in my Matrix Revealed thread. The act of abduction does not indicate "spirituality". Also, many other abductees report seeing Mantids working along side of Grays during abductions.

Also, in abducting humans they intentionally create amnesia by blocking the conscious memory of the abduction. This not only indicates unethical behavior but also indicates they have something to hide. And I can say from my own experiences with Mantids that they do indeed have a lot to hide. And one of the activities they hide is the programming/brainwashing that they inculcate in NDEs and in-between lives, out of body abductions in their implanting ships, which I described in the EYE OF RA two decades before Simon went public with his "information".

Simon has indicated that he learned about these in-between lives implanting ships, which he called "processing" ships, from his Mantids. He even has stated that we should not go to the light. He was correct about that!

So it is very clear to me that his Mantids are no different than the Mantids who have been abducting me and countless others for thousands of years.

If these Mantids truly want to evolve, I say that would be great!

So let me address these Mantids directly right now with these questions:

If you truly want to evolve, why don't you stop abducting us?

If you truly want to evolve, why don't you stop wiping our memories?

If you truly want to evolve, why don't you stop inculcating us with your mind control programming?

If you truly want to evolve, why don't you stop pulling us out of our bodies and into your implanting ships?

If you truly want to evolve, why don't you stop working with the Annunaki to create opposing religions, secret societies, satanic ritual sacrifices, wars and chaos in order to keep Earth inhabitants in spiritual darkness?

If you truly want to evolve, why don't you stop hiding "behind the curtain" like cowards and sociopaths and come forward into the public venue and sincerely APOLOGIZE for all the wars and chaos and false programming and pain and suffering that you have caused for thousands, if not millions, of years?

If you truly want to evolve, why don't you stop being our prison guards, CONFESS the truth about your nefarious activities and open the gates to this prison planet to finally free all the good spiritual beings on this planet?

If you truly want to evolve, why don't you help rehabilitate all the sociopaths on Earth that you, the Annunaki and Reptilians have supported and placed into powerful positions on this planet?

If you truly want to evolve, why don't you educate us on clean, non-polluting energy so we can take better care of this planet and live in peace and harmony?

If you truly want to evolve, why don't you also educate us on the technologies of non-polluting transportation so we no longer have to be dependent on the pollution of the petroleum industries?

If you truly want to evolve, why don't you stop and listen to us more evolved beings on this planet that you have abused for so long so that we can help you evolve?

If you truly want to evolve, why don't you give us all the technologies you possess including weapons so we can blast your asses into another dimension if you choose not to evolve and continue your spiritually oppressive activities?

And may the truth set you free as well,

Truman L. Cash

[bettye198]

Since I do not have a Mantid connection Truman nor do I have validation you do, I cannot speak on this but you do bring up valid points for other people who feel connections to ET's. I personally choose not to engage with any ET's for one big reason. ET's in lower densities have an agenda and they think about serving in a much different way than we humans do. This brings up the issue of Trust. I would not jump onto a craft or allow an ET to channel thru me or control any portion of my life existence. I am my own Divine being and I do not serve two masters so to speak.
We have no idea if people we know on this planet, who do connect with ET's intimately, are who they are. They may be them and just here to observe or spread the good word or manipulate. Its a wild crapshoot. How do we discern that?

[onawah]

As far as I can see, we can only discern that by examining the evidence with as much detachment and neutrality as possible.
Our emotions and preconceptions often get in the way, while intuition can be a useful tool, but as with discernment, intuition must be exercised in order to grow in clarity and usefulness.
It's a learning process, and it takes time and patience and an unprejudiced mind.

[Litenites]

Brilliant discussion.

[Litenites]

Posted by JChombre (here)

Posted by ahamkara (here)
An interesting repeat of the pattern, which occurs here on the forum (and also in our elections!). A controversial character is presented with a strong polarizing effect. People feel righteous indignation that any of the characters views be examined due to the morals of the figure. Much energy expended attacking/defending said character. People become strongly activated emotionally. Just an observation.

Hi Ahamkara, I am so glad that you have made this observation too.

Since I came back, I have been puzzled by the fact that more people have not come to the realization that thru the use of fear generated by the elections, controversial people and topics... we have been set up to be divided and hate each other. This is not happening by chance, it is done by design. In fact, we are walking through a dangerous field full of emotional field mines designed and ready to explode and spew negativity all over the world.

This program has achieved its goal very successfully, especially with these elections because the emotional and spiritual make-up of the planet has changed as planned. It used to be that "we are our brothers keepers"; now it is "your brother is a pestilence and your worst enemy. You have to get rid of him." Very interesting!

Many blessings to you

JC

Exactly, Divide and Conquer, keep the people fighting each other, polarised and not connected, distracted by material gain, competition from birth to death, control of the human is paramount, the deeper we allow ourselves to enmesh with the control system, the more irretrievably lost we become until we no longer have any will to regain what we could be if we rejected the masters manipulations en masse.

[Mike]

the most intriguing (and DISTURBING) part of the interview begins around the 40 minute mark, and has nothing to do with Simon. here Kerry is discussing "predatory sexuality" and is sort of blithely and obnoxiously dismissive of anyone who isnt fully aware of the situation..all while she's exploiting it as a reason to bring up her dubious "career" in hollywood (if she fetched david hasselhoff's lunch even once, i would be genuinely shocked..)

but here's the kicker: to my astonishment, she optimistically connects satanism and pedophilia with kundalini activation/awakening, and concludes "so there is a positive side to these things.."

WHAT THE F#CK???

when considered next to her disquieting defense of Simon's sexual improprieties in one of those earlier simon threads (the intellectually, emotionally and spiritually egregious and indefensible excuse that since its been going on for centuries, it is therefore okay..and we're all overreacting (and here i'm talking about so called spiritual authorities taking sexual advantage of their followers)
..it is particularly disturbing

was anyone else as disturbed by that as i was?????

...and then she proceeds to ask about how he was "attacked" here on avalon. if someone here hit him over the head with a hammer, i might have said he was attacked. i said it earlier and i'll say it again: people who overuse this word are generally people who live sheltered, insular lives and have forgotten what a real attack is. OR, they are using it as a shield or a table-turning technique to avoid answering hard but fair questions....

..and thats what simon does. he tries to turn the tables. he tries to go on the offensive and put the forum on the defensive....and to do this he manufactures this absurd scenario about the vatican and remote viewing and some other silly bullsh!t i was forced to tune out for fear that i'd lapse into an apoplectic fit

..earlier he blamed his sexual improprieties on an invisible reptile; this time he blames the vaticans psychic assassins.

this guy is shameless. he and kerry make a good pair.

p.s. I CHALLENGE KERRY CASSIDY TO COME ON THIS FORUM AND ADDRESS THAT COMMENT SHE MADE. PLEASE BE CLEAR AND CONCISE AND EXPLAIN EXACTLY WHAT YOU MEANT BY THAT.

[Chester]

Very good post, Mike.

What baffles me is that anyone would promote someone knowing they are aiding and abetting that someone's mining of the vulnerable - simply unconscionable.

[Chester]

Posted by Lancelot (here)
Simon was very much attacked by certain members of this forum which is why he left.

If you call what folks posted on this forum "attacked" how do you characterize Simon's admitted behavior?

[Chester]

Posted by onawah (here)
Simon's recent prediction of bloodshed on New Year's Day did occur.

Loss Of Life Event New Year's Day
Friday 30th December 2016
Information given to me from remote viewers - potential loss of life event tomorrow - I normally only post when info verified by two independent sources - I don't have time as the activity period is too short - and it would be irresponsible of me not to post this alert.
Monday 2nd January 2017
I take no pleasure in noting that our warning of loss of life for New Year's Day was right on target and I was right to go public with it.
My lasting regret was that I had no further info as to the location.
Our thoughts with all in Turkey

From:
https://www.simonparkes.org/

so that makes him what??? one for nine hundred and thirty seven?

even a broken clock is right twice a day

[Chester]

Posted by ahamkara (here)
Hmm, just went back and read some of the backstory on Mr. Parkes. (Missed it the first time around).

Certainly, there seems to be strong reason to warn people of his ethics and the dangers of direct communication with the man. But my question is, would that automatically call into question all of his information? Surely the people he discusses are not known for their ethics or their morality. And while one should always consider the source, is it possible he puts out some real info with the BS? He mentions that many sources are used for destabilization (with or without their consent). I know that lies and truth are often intermingled to obscure and redirect attention. It's hard to know, but an important question, since some of what he says still seems to on target....

When someone promotes themselves as some form of "helper" of people... and that someone does so, creates a track record for doing so and along the way and there is never any indication that that someone's interests are anything other than to help folks, and this someone shares their "other worldly" experiences in the process, I make odds higher that these shared experiences are truthful as opposed to someone who...

... who on the other hand that same someone embarks upon 'timeline two' as it were, a time line where the "what" you have read such as in the links provided by Herve demonstrates serial behaviors that clearly are not helpful and could be characterized as harmful, then one has case building that perhaps a lack of integrity may exist. When a lack of integrity exists, you can raise the odds that perhaps the experiences shared by this someone may be nothing more than attention grabbers meant all and only for the purpose of mining for the vulnerable.

You make your own calls there... I just made the case for why perhaps his stories may be utter BS.

Yet regardless of the degree of truth to any of his stories, this still provides no license to behave as those threads have demonstrated and as he admitted (an admission which is documented despite his quick removal of his admission).

Now, I hope he's sought counseling. I hope that he has or at least will arrest these behaviors. If indeed he does, then I am his biggest fan though I would still be concerned the whole persona creation was all and only meant to get attention which raised the likely success rate in ensnaring several vulnerables.

[Chester]

Posted by bluegalacticmonkey (here)

Posted by JChombre (here)

Posted by bluegalacticmonkey (here)
I don't believe we should be subjected to GROUP THINK in this forum. Simon Parkes resonates with many of us who have watched his interviews and actually know his history. I have no doubt about his sincerity and personally have thanked him many times for the insight and inspiration he has given to me and many others. Please allow others to use their own judgement and to trust their own feelings. I hope you take this in the spirit in which it is meant, we are all growing and testing out our new paradigm. Let's be open to letting each other decide.

Thank you Bluegaclacticmonkey. Thank you for this excellent, powerful, and highly considerate post.

It is quite obvious that Simon Parkes' information highly resonates with you. So, please be true to yourself and use it at your discretion. Every person has his/her own path, and no one has the monopoly on truth. So if I were you I would not worry about those who disagree with Simon Parkes. They are entitled to their opinions.

Sincere regards and many blessings to you

JC

Dear JC the user who posted these vıdeos was advısed to speak to the moderator and get hıs opınıon on the truth about Sımon. Do you see what I mean about groupthınk? We need sovereign beıngs strong ın theır own truth and not feelıng ın any way ıntımıdated to conform. Its the only way we can truly create somethıng new where no one persons opınıon ranks as truth. We are on the same page whıch I hope you can see'?

I think you are right... GroupThink - horrific.

Yet also, I once saw a blind person about to step right into traffic and then I saw a group of people who all thought she was endangering herself. Folks in a group thought. It so happened they all shared the same thought and... fortunately for her, folks in that group stopped her (acted upon their shared thought).

[Chester]

Posted by JChombre (here)
It used to be that "we are our brothers keepers"; now it is "your brother is a pestilence and your worst enemy. You have to get rid of him." Very interesting!

And then there's what has been left out... that which many folks align with but gets zero air time.

Help... help your brother, help him until you see that you may have crossed that magic line where you are not helping but enabling... and that in fact, your enabling is actually harmful too... and in fact your form of harm is the worst kind as you are removing his freedom to experience his own personal responsibility and his freedom of choice in how to act upon it.

[Chester]

Posted by JChombre (here)

Posted by Sam Hunter (here)

Posted by JChombre (here)
It used to be that "we are our brothers keepers"; now it is "your brother is a pestilence and your worst enemy. You have to get rid of him." Very interesting!

Glad to see that you found this post, but you are completely missing the point that I was making…. But let’s move on!

If the most important thing in your opinion is to figure out the magic line beyond which the help and support provided is detrimental to the receiving person, then I would suggest that you bring your concern to the attention of the medical staff or counselors involved with your specific situation.

IMHO, that is the only way that you are going to get some air time with them.

Hi JC, I would be happy to have an honest conversation with you but... it would need to be honest.

If you are willing to commit to such, then I am happy to enter into conversation with you... please, let me know.

[Chester]

Posted by JChombre (here)

Posted by Sam Hunter (here)

Posted by JChombre (here)

Posted by Sam Hunter (here)

Posted by JChombre (here)
It used to be that "we are our brothers keepers"; now it is "your brother is a pestilence and your worst enemy. You have to get rid of him." Very interesting!

Glad to see that you found this post, but you are completely missing the point that I was making…. But let’s move on!

If the most important thing in your opinion is to figure out the magic line beyond which the help and support provided is detrimental to the receiving person, then I would suggest that you bring your concern to the attention of the medical staff or counselors involved with your specific situation.

IMHO, that is the only way that you are going to get some air time with them.

Hi JC, I would be happy to have an honest conversation with you but... it would need to be honest.

If you are willing to commit to such, then I am happy to enter into conversation with you... please, let me know.

Hello Sam,

I am struggling to understand your message! And I must say that I am baffled, bewildered by it!

Are you asking me to commit to something, to a situation that I know absolutely nothing about? Why would I do something like that?

What leverage do you have that would force me to subjugate myself to your will? For instance, do you pay me a salary or a consultant fee that I will lose if I don't accept your conditions?

Then you say: "it would need to be honest." Well, do I strike you as someone who is dishonest?

Please, allow me to suggest this: avoid setting conditions on people or situations that you don't control.

Be well,

JC

Hi JC,

Thanks for responding. It is clear that you have declined my invitation for a discussion.

Just a suggestion... don't waste folks time with discussions or opinions on quality forums such as this unless you also intend to be honest. Don't make implications on what you wish readers to think that others have written that are not founded in an fact or evidence as that is dishonest. In other words, don't reinterpret what others write into something you wish other readers to think was written when it wasn't... and where your interpretation cannot be shared by any other sovereign minded reader because it is ludicrous.

And another tip... don't point fingers at others when the other three are pointing right back at you.

Ohhhh and one more recommendation. Don't insist others not set parameters for conversations when it is clear you are trying every way you know how to control the conversation.

[Flash]

BLESSED AM I AMONG MEN FOR I HAVE FOUND THE GOD INSIDE

cool off, both of you Sam and JChombre, you both are god inside. Have you forgotten?