Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

Yes a possibility that it's some sort of legend imprinted on the side of the globe, like this still from another clip:

[Bill Ryan]

Look at this

• http://christianitytoday.com/ct/search/?x=0&y=0&query="Looney+Toons"

[Ewan]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Look at this

• http://christianitytoday.com/ct/search/?x=0&y=0&query="Looney+Toons"

Sorry, I don't understand. I'm looking at spelling mistakes*, or is this an example of how one word can replace another and forty years from now people will be saying I remember it was Looney Tunes?

A search on same website for "looney tunes" returns 11 results.

*assumes said authors never saw a Looney Tunes cartoon in their life and are just guessing based on a more modern parlance of 'toons

I'm missing something here aren't I?

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Ewan (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Look at this

• http://christianitytoday.com/ct/search/?x=0&y=0&query="Looney+Toons"

Sorry, I don't understand. I'm looking at spelling mistakes*, or is this an example of how one word can replace another and forty years from now people will be saying I remember it was Looney Tunes?

A search on same website for "looney tunes" returns 11 results.

*assumes said authors never saw a Looney Tunes cartoon in their life and are just guessing based on a more modern parlance of 'toons

I'm missing something here aren't I?

Yes. It used to be Looney Toons. (As in cartoons.) Now, it's changed.

[Mark (Star Mariner)]

It could be that people mis-remember this sort of thing, and replace the actual name with a construct of their own that, though it may logically fit, is not accurate. At least it's possible. Personally I remember 'Looney Tunes', not toons.

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Yes. It used to be Looney Toons. (As in cartoons.) Now, it's changed.

Looney Tunes

"Looney Tunes is an American animated series of comedy short films produced by Warner Bros. from 1930 to 1969 during the golden age of American animation, alongside its sister series Merrie Melodies.[2] It was known for introducing such famous cartoon characters as Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, Porky Pig, Elmer Fudd, Tweety Bird, Sylvester the Cat, Yosemite Sam, Foghorn Leghorn, Marvin the Martian, Pepé Le Pew, Speedy Gonzales, Wile E. Coyote and the Road Runner, the Tasmanian Devil, and many others. These characters themselves are commonly referred to as the "Looney Tunes”."

The Looney Tunes Show

"The Looney Tunes Show premiered in the United States on May 3, 2011, through August 31, 2014, on Cartoon Network. In Australia, the first two seasons of the series began airing on 9Go!. And Foxtel channel on Cartoon Network."

"The Looney Tunes Show is an American animated sitcom that ran from May 3, 2011, through August 31, 2014, on Cartoon Network. The show features characters from the Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies theatrical cartoons updated for the 21st century. It is produced by Warner Bros. Animation. On July 29, 2014, producer Tony Cervone confirmed that the series would not be renewed for a third season in light of Wabbit.[1] Looney Tunes: Rabbits Run is an animated direct-to-video spin-off film released on August 4, 2015.[2]"

Warner's cartoons

"Warner's cartoon unit had its roots in the independent Harman and Ising studio. From 1930 to 1933, Disney alumni Hugh Harman and Rudolf Ising produced musical cartoons for Leon Schlesinger, who sold them to Warner. Harman and Ising introduced their character Bosko in the first Looney Tunes cartoon, Sinkin' in the Bathtub, and created a sister series, Merrie Melodies, in 1931.[110]"

"In 1935, Avery directed cartoons starring Porky Pig, which established the character as the studio's first animated star.[111] In addition to Porky, Warner Bros. cartoon characters Daffy Duck (who debuted in the 1937 short Porky's Duck Hunt), Elmer Fudd (who debuted in the 1940 short Elmer's Candid Camera), Bugs Bunny (who debuted in the 1940 short A Wild Hare), and Tweety (who debuted in the 1942 short A Tale of Two Kitties) achieved star power.[112] By 1942, the Schlesinger studio had surpassed Walt Disney Studios as the most successful producer of animated shorts.[113]"

"Warner Bros. eventually bought Schlesinger's cartoon unit in 1944 and renamed it Warner Bros. Cartoons. Unfortunately, the unit was indifferently treated by senior management, beginning with the installation of Edward Selzer as senior producer, whom the creative staff considered an interfering incompetent. Jack had little regard for the company's short film product and reputedly was so ignorant about the animation division of the studio that he was mistakenly convinced that the unit produced cartoons of Mickey Mouse, Walt Disney Productions' flagship character.[114] He sold off the unit's pre-August 1948 library for $3,000 each, which proved a shortsighted transaction in light of its eventual value.[114]"

"Warner Bros. Cartoons continued, with intermittent interruptions, until 1969 when it was dissolved as the parent company ceased film shorts entirely. Characters such as Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, Tweety Bird, Sylvester, and Porky Pig became central to the company's image in subsequent decades…"

[sunwings]

Looney Toons is a poplular Mandela effect. I certainly remember Toons not Tunes.

As Bill pointed out the Name is a play on cartoons , while Tunes just doesn´t make sense and never will.

In 1990 Warner Brothers and Spielberg created Tiny Toons. A Spin off from Looney Toons using baby versions of the famous Looney toons characters.

Why didn't they call it Tiny Tunes?

[Innocent Warrior]

An interesting resource to use when seeing whether a presented Mandela effect is a construct of their own mind, as Star Mariner suggests, or a legit Mandela effect is eBay. The items will show the changed version, while the seller lists it as per their memory of it, and if a search returns a significant number of results, it's reasonable to suggest it's a legit ME. In that case, the differing memories between individuals may suggest they remember different timelines. Looney Toons returns 3,013 results (that includes some Tiny Toons listings) - http://www.ebay.ca/sch/i.html?isRefi...rs=spell_check

[Satori]

My last name is Looney. Two of my brothers and I played guitar most of our lives, for ****s and giggles mostly. We used to joke that if we ever performed together we would call ourselves "Looney Tunes" because we remembered what is now "Looney Tunes" as "Looney Toons" and by using the name "Looney Tunes", a play of words on music, that we would not be sued for trade name or copyright infringement. I guess we were wrong and we would have been sued if we had followed up on that and if we didn't suck as musicians.

[Bob]

For what it's worth - as the logo/trademark for Warner Bros. was legally registered with the trademark/patent office (see below), doing a search for historical reference there provides this:
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfi...h=Submit+Query

from a 1940's era trademark



and



(title: House Hunting Mouse")

I recall "tunes", not toons, as also apparently so does the patent/trademark database..

trademark database with original picture:
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfi...05:tmt1dr.2.31

[sunwings]

Posted by Rachel (here)
An interesting resource to use when seeing whether a presented Mandela effect is a construct of their own mind, as Star Mariner suggests, or a legit Mandela effect is eBay. The items will show the changed version, while the seller lists it as per their memory of it, and if a search returns a significant number of results, it's reasonable to suggest it's a legit ME. In that case, the differing memories between individuals may suggest they remember different timelines. Looney Toons returns 3,013 results (that includes some Tiny Toons listings) - http://www.ebay.ca/sch/i.html?isRefi...rs=spell_check

The Sex in the city Ebay page is another great example of peoples memories not matching up with reality.

http://www.ebay.ca/sch/i.html?_odkw=...+city&_sacat=0

[Innocent Warrior]

I recall "tunes", not toons, as also apparently so does the patent/trademark database..

trademark database with original picture:
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfi...05:tmt1dr.2.31

Very cool because I vividly remember Looney Toons, I can still see the image of it in my mind and Looney Tunes looks wrong. The next thought you typically have is, well maybe they changed it, but evidently not.

I've noticed two ways the ME is experienced that's convincing. One being the old version is a vivid memory and the change can't be dismissed. The other being I notice it first, before it's on the internet as a ME, and I think to myself something like, "how odd, I'm sure it was such and such, they must have changed it" and then you see it online and all the others who remember it exactly the same as you did. Some you can dismiss by thinking, well maybe we all sang the lyrics wrong, that happens a lot, but there are all sorts of different changes, so after a few that reasoning doesn't stick so well. Looney Toons is a good one, because we saw it so many times, so I imagine it's quite vivid for a lot of people.

[Ewan]

Of course it was Toons, I don't know what happened to me yesterday. For some reason I thought Tunes was right, nothing odd about it, hence my query to Bill's post. But once I saw the image(s) posted by RunningDeer I knew it was 'wrong'.

The film with Bob Hoskins as the private-eye, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, it was all about Toon Town, it has always been Toons. Looney Toons makes sense, tunes does not really.

It is as though these changes are being done by an AI that doesn't have a full grasp of the language. Interview with the Vampire made a degree of sense, but Interview with A Vampire made more in connection with the actual film. Sex and the City never made much kind of sense, Sex in the City does.

Has the matrix got a virus?

[meat suit]

Posted by Ewan (here)
Of course it was Toons, I don't know what happened to me yesterday. For some reason I thought Tunes was right, nothing odd about it, hence my query to Bill's post. But once I saw the image(s) posted by RunningDeer I knew it was 'wrong'.

The film with Bob Hoskins as the private-eye, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, it was all about Toon Town, it has always been Toons. Looney Toons makes sense, tunes does not really.

It is as though these changes are being done by an AI that doesn't have a full grasp of the language. Interview with the Vampire made a degree of sense, but Interview with A Vampire made more in connection with the actual film. Sex and the City never made much kind of sense, Sex in the City does.

Has the matrix got a virus?

maybe we are on a dodgy 'backup'

[Flash]

I remember looney toons as well, the cartoon title was in English (not translated), but the cartoon itself was translated into French and I did listen to it when little.

However, curiously, I still fail to find any Mandela Effect in French itself and I find it very odd. Why wouldn't the Mandela effect be in every language?

And it is as often found in pictures (like the warlike robot sometimes with a silver leg and sometimes with a gold leg)?

Posted by Rachel (here)

I recall "tunes", not toons, as also apparently so does the patent/trademark database..

trademark database with original picture:
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfi...05:tmt1dr.2.31

Very cool because I vividly remember Looney Toons, I can still see the image of it in my mind and Looney Tunes looks wrong. The next thought you typically have is, well maybe they changed it, but evidently not.

I've noticed two ways the ME is experienced that's convincing. One being the old version is a vivid memory and the change can't be dismissed. The other being I notice it first, before it's on the internet as a ME, and I think to myself something like, "how odd, I'm sure it was such and such, they must have changed it" and then you see it online and all the others who remember it exactly the same as you did. Some you can dismiss by thinking, well maybe we all sang the lyrics wrong, that happens a lot, but there are all sorts of different changes, so after a few that reasoning doesn't stick so well. Looney Toons is a good one, because we saw it so many times, so I imagine it's quite vivid for a lot of people.

[AuCo]

I my memory serves me right. I once was watching "Looney Toons" and thought they could have played with words and named it "Looney Tunes" because the sound track was so "funky".

The focal point is how is a product called reality defined?

[7alon]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Ewan (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
Look at this

• http://christianitytoday.com/ct/search/?x=0&y=0&query="Looney+Toons"

Sorry, I don't understand. I'm looking at spelling mistakes*, or is this an example of how one word can replace another and forty years from now people will be saying I remember it was Looney Tunes?

A search on same website for "looney tunes" returns 11 results.

*assumes said authors never saw a Looney Tunes cartoon in their life and are just guessing based on a more modern parlance of 'toons

I'm missing something here aren't I?

Yes. It used to be Looney Toons. (As in cartoons.) Now, it's changed.

Wait.. it is Looney Tunes now?

This is gonna sound a little weird btw, but I noticed a moderator here called 'Rachel'. Before I start to forget, in case I do; until today there was no Rachel for me. She isn't the only one either. Marianne was never there either for me.

Just wanted to say that because I've never experienced something like this just appear to me before (no offense to the people I named, just really shocked). I've had visions of other timelines recently, and somehow I knew what they were and started feeling really sad. I was going to post about it sooner, but it just seemed odd to me and I didn't feel ready to share it, until the above happened today.

Mod comment from Bill: Rachel used to be Innocent Warrior... see her Avatar, which still shows her old name, to avoid confusion (if possible!). We changed it when she rejoined the mods team a short while ago. It's a core part of the Avalon tradition that all mods have 'real' names, to present a human face to the community at all times.

[Bob]

Searched the patent/trademark database again today, searched on "Looney Toons" - this was the database reply

No TESS records were found to match the criteria of your query.

Then searched the patent/trademark database for "Looney Tunes" - this was the database reply

32 Records(s) found (This page: 1 ~ 32)

The records are as follows (no change from yesterday's search)



Another "Looney Tunes" image frequently used


In 1953 this was registered with the US trademark/patent office



I am familiar with the concept of "quantum track slide". My belief is there is not enough quantum alteration happening atm to induce such slides. I do believe an event horizon matrix opening (not a virus) can appear only during hydrogen bomb explosions, or supernova events. I don't believe we have been near by any supernova events. For what its worth.

[Flash]

Posted by Flash (here)
I remember looney toons as well, the cartoon title was in English (not translated), but the cartoon itself was translated into French and I did listen to it when little.

However, curiously, I still fail to find any Mandela Effect in French itself and I find it very odd. Why wouldn't the Mandela effect be in every language?

And it is as often found in pictures (like the warlike robot sometimes with a silver leg and sometimes with a gold leg)?

Posted by Rachel (here)

I recall "tunes", not toons, as also apparently so does the patent/trademark database..

trademark database with original picture:
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfi...05:tmt1dr.2.31

Very cool because I vividly remember Looney Toons, I can still see the image of it in my mind and Looney Tunes looks wrong. The next thought you typically have is, well maybe they changed it, but evidently not.

I've noticed two ways the ME is experienced that's convincing. One being the old version is a vivid memory and the change can't be dismissed. The other being I notice it first, before it's on the internet as a ME, and I think to myself something like, "how odd, I'm sure it was such and such, they must have changed it" and then you see it online and all the others who remember it exactly the same as you did. Some you can dismiss by thinking, well maybe we all sang the lyrics wrong, that happens a lot, but there are all sorts of different changes, so after a few that reasoning doesn't stick so well. Looney Toons is a good one, because we saw it so many times, so I imagine it's quite vivid for a lot of people.

I must add something else to this post of mine above.

This morning , i decided to search for Looney toones but in the French google search, and felt on a site for the most likes cartoons. I punch in 50's and 60's and got l
Looney toones in it. I thought "wow, just got it, with the original wording, I will post it on avalon, since the French side has not Mandela effect". I came, wrote the post, went back to get the 50's and 60's add for Looney toones and it had become Looney tunes. I truly thought I had crossed eyes, or something, in fact I thought it was the unconscious infuence of this thread that made me see it as Looney Toons at first. I thought "am I going nuts?". I did not dare writing up what I had seen at first, because I really thought I had been influenced and that the actual French add was for Looney Tunes all along, but wishing to see Toons, i had seen it, instead of the real stuff.

But thinking it over, maybe we are actually creating reality as we go along, changing stuff, therefore the Mandela effect, which is now becoming transparent and fast how creative/reality creating we are.

To tell the truth, I am confused about this since this morning.

[Bob]

An original audio track plus the video track, how it opened. It hasn't change for me for as long as I can remember, Tunes, not Toons.. is what continues to come up. I just can't get into the "slide" and experience it as "toons", sorry.. maybe the audio will re-que the original track. The idea of sliding onto the "other track" is intriguing, I will say that.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=0jTHNBKjMBU