+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 1 4 5 LastLast
Results 61 to 80 of 90

Thread: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

  1. Link to Post #61
    Administrator Mark (Star Mariner)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    15th November 2011
    Language
    English
    Posts
    6,704
    Thanks
    42,991
    Thanked 56,536 times in 6,616 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    Yes a possibility that it's some sort of legend imprinted on the side of the globe, like this still from another clip:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	maplegend11.jpg
Views:	104
Size:	37.6 KB
ID:	34801
    "When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace."
    ~ Jimi Hendrix

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Mark (Star Mariner) For This Post:

    BMJ (12th January 2017), Hervé (12th January 2017), raregem (18th April 2017), RunningDeer (12th January 2017)

  3. Link to Post #62
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    38,620
    Thanks
    275,330
    Thanked 514,534 times in 37,159 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence


  4. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    avid (19th April 2017), BMJ (18th April 2017), Bob (19th April 2017), Mike (19th April 2017), raregem (18th April 2017), RunningDeer (18th April 2017), Shannon (19th April 2017), sunwings (18th April 2017)

  5. Link to Post #63
    Scotland Avalon Member Ewan's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th February 2015
    Location
    Ireland
    Age
    63
    Posts
    2,623
    Thanks
    77,481
    Thanked 21,161 times in 2,577 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence


    Sorry, I don't understand. I'm looking at spelling mistakes*, or is this an example of how one word can replace another and forty years from now people will be saying I remember it was Looney Tunes?

    A search on same website for "looney tunes" returns 11 results.

    *assumes said authors never saw a Looney Tunes cartoon in their life and are just guessing based on a more modern parlance of 'toons

    I'm missing something here aren't I?
    Last edited by Ewan; 19th April 2017 at 13:58. Reason: Spelling, ironically

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Ewan For This Post:

    Bob (19th April 2017), meat suit (19th April 2017), Mike (19th April 2017), RunningDeer (19th April 2017)

  7. Link to Post #64
    UK Avalon Founder Bill Ryan's Avatar
    Join Date
    7th February 2010
    Location
    Ecuador
    Posts
    38,620
    Thanks
    275,330
    Thanked 514,534 times in 37,159 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    Quote Posted by Ewan (here)
    Sorry, I don't understand. I'm looking at spelling mistakes*, or is this an example of how one word can replace another and forty years from now people will be saying I remember it was Looney Tunes?

    A search on same website for "looney tunes" returns 11 results.

    *assumes said authors never saw a Looney Tunes cartoon in their life and are just guessing based on a more modern parlance of 'toons

    I'm missing something here aren't I?
    Yes. It used to be Looney Toons. (As in cartoons.) Now, it's changed.

  8. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Bill Ryan For This Post:

    7alon (20th April 2017), avid (19th April 2017), BMJ (19th April 2017), Ewan (19th April 2017), Innocent Warrior (19th April 2017), kanishk (20th April 2017), Shannon (19th April 2017)

  9. Link to Post #65
    Administrator Mark (Star Mariner)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    15th November 2011
    Language
    English
    Posts
    6,704
    Thanks
    42,991
    Thanked 56,536 times in 6,616 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    It could be that people mis-remember this sort of thing, and replace the actual name with a construct of their own that, though it may logically fit, is not accurate. At least it's possible. Personally I remember 'Looney Tunes', not toons.

    Last edited by Mark (Star Mariner); 19th April 2017 at 15:17.
    "When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace."
    ~ Jimi Hendrix

  10. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Mark (Star Mariner) For This Post:

    avid (20th April 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), Bob (19th April 2017), Bruno (19th April 2017), Innocent Warrior (19th April 2017), Isserley (20th April 2017), Mike (19th April 2017), RunningDeer (19th April 2017)

  11. Link to Post #66
    United States Avalon Member RunningDeer's Avatar
    Join Date
    6th February 2012
    Location
    Forest Dweller
    Language
    English
    Age
    75
    Posts
    19,635
    Thanks
    135,609
    Thanked 180,960 times in 19,444 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    Quote Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
    Yes. It used to be Looney Toons. (As in cartoons.) Now, it's changed.
    Looney Tunes
    "Looney Tunes is an American animated series of comedy short films produced by Warner Bros. from 1930 to 1969 during the golden age of American animation, alongside its sister series Merrie Melodies.[2] It was known for introducing such famous cartoon characters as Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, Porky Pig, Elmer Fudd, Tweety Bird, Sylvester the Cat, Yosemite Sam, Foghorn Leghorn, Marvin the Martian, Pepé Le Pew, Speedy Gonzales, Wile E. Coyote and the Road Runner, the Tasmanian Devil, and many others. These characters themselves are commonly referred to as the "Looney Tunes”."




    The Looney Tunes Show
    "The Looney Tunes Show premiered in the United States on May 3, 2011, through August 31, 2014, on Cartoon Network. In Australia, the first two seasons of the series began airing on 9Go!. And Foxtel channel on Cartoon Network."

    "The Looney Tunes Show is an American animated sitcom that ran from May 3, 2011, through August 31, 2014, on Cartoon Network. The show features characters from the Looney Tunes and Merrie Melodies theatrical cartoons updated for the 21st century. It is produced by Warner Bros. Animation. On July 29, 2014, producer Tony Cervone confirmed that the series would not be renewed for a third season in light of Wabbit.[1] Looney Tunes: Rabbits Run is an animated direct-to-video spin-off film released on August 4, 2015.[2]"
    Warner's cartoons
    "Warner's cartoon unit had its roots in the independent Harman and Ising studio. From 1930 to 1933, Disney alumni Hugh Harman and Rudolf Ising produced musical cartoons for Leon Schlesinger, who sold them to Warner. Harman and Ising introduced their character Bosko in the first Looney Tunes cartoon, Sinkin' in the Bathtub, and created a sister series, Merrie Melodies, in 1931.[110]"

    "In 1935, Avery directed cartoons starring Porky Pig, which established the character as the studio's first animated star.[111] In addition to Porky, Warner Bros. cartoon characters Daffy Duck (who debuted in the 1937 short Porky's Duck Hunt), Elmer Fudd (who debuted in the 1940 short Elmer's Candid Camera), Bugs Bunny (who debuted in the 1940 short A Wild Hare), and Tweety (who debuted in the 1942 short A Tale of Two Kitties) achieved star power.[112] By 1942, the Schlesinger studio had surpassed Walt Disney Studios as the most successful producer of animated shorts.[113]"

    "Warner Bros. eventually bought Schlesinger's cartoon unit in 1944 and renamed it Warner Bros. Cartoons. Unfortunately, the unit was indifferently treated by senior management, beginning with the installation of Edward Selzer as senior producer, whom the creative staff considered an interfering incompetent. Jack had little regard for the company's short film product and reputedly was so ignorant about the animation division of the studio that he was mistakenly convinced that the unit produced cartoons of Mickey Mouse, Walt Disney Productions' flagship character.[114] He sold off the unit's pre-August 1948 library for $3,000 each, which proved a shortsighted transaction in light of its eventual value.[114]"

    "Warner Bros. Cartoons continued, with intermittent interruptions, until 1969 when it was dissolved as the parent company ceased film shorts entirely. Characters such as Bugs Bunny, Daffy Duck, Tweety Bird, Sylvester, and Porky Pig became central to the company's image in subsequent decades…"

  12. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to RunningDeer For This Post:

    avid (20th April 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), Bob (19th April 2017), Ewan (20th April 2017), Innocent Warrior (19th April 2017), Mike (19th April 2017)

  13. Link to Post #67
    UK Avalon Member sunwings's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd May 2016
    Location
    Barcelona
    Age
    42
    Posts
    689
    Thanks
    3,385
    Thanked 4,936 times in 669 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    Looney Toons is a poplular Mandela effect. I certainly remember Toons not Tunes.

    As Bill pointed out the Name is a play on cartoons , while Tunes just doesn´t make sense and never will.

    In 1990 Warner Brothers and Spielberg created Tiny Toons. A Spin off from Looney Toons using baby versions of the famous Looney toons characters.

    Why didn't they call it Tiny Tunes?


  14. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to sunwings For This Post:

    7alon (20th April 2017), BMJ (19th April 2017), Bruno (19th April 2017), Ewan (19th April 2017), Innocent Warrior (19th April 2017), kanishk (20th April 2017)

  15. Link to Post #68
    Australia On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    30th October 2014
    Location
    Great Northern Hotel, Twin Peaks.
    Posts
    3,798
    Thanks
    27,120
    Thanked 29,634 times in 3,484 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    An interesting resource to use when seeing whether a presented Mandela effect is a construct of their own mind, as Star Mariner suggests, or a legit Mandela effect is eBay. The items will show the changed version, while the seller lists it as per their memory of it, and if a search returns a significant number of results, it's reasonable to suggest it's a legit ME. In that case, the differing memories between individuals may suggest they remember different timelines. Looney Toons returns 3,013 results (that includes some Tiny Toons listings) - http://www.ebay.ca/sch/i.html?isRefi...rs=spell_check
    Last edited by Innocent Warrior; 19th April 2017 at 16:41. Reason: added text
    Never give up on your silly, silly dreams.

    You mustn't be afraid to dream a little BIGGER, darling.

  16. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Innocent Warrior For This Post:

    avid (20th April 2017), Bill Ryan (19th April 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), Bruno (19th April 2017), Ewan (19th April 2017), kanishk (20th April 2017), meat suit (20th April 2017), RunningDeer (20th April 2017)

  17. Link to Post #69
    Avalon Member
    Join Date
    26th May 2010
    Age
    75
    Posts
    2,694
    Thanks
    31
    Thanked 20 Times in 1 Post

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    My last name is Looney. Two of my brothers and I played guitar most of our lives, for ****s and giggles mostly. We used to joke that if we ever performed together we would call ourselves "Looney Tunes" because we remembered what is now "Looney Tunes" as "Looney Toons" and by using the name "Looney Tunes", a play of words on music, that we would not be sued for trade name or copyright infringement. I guess we were wrong and we would have been sued if we had followed up on that and if we didn't suck as musicians.

  18. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to Satori For This Post:

    avid (20th April 2017), BMJ (19th April 2017), Bob (19th April 2017), Ewan (20th April 2017), gaiagirl (20th April 2017), Innocent Warrior (20th April 2017), RunningDeer (20th April 2017), sunwings (19th April 2017)

  19. Link to Post #70
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    23rd June 2013
    Location
    North America
    Age
    73
    Posts
    6,884
    Thanks
    12,723
    Thanked 29,293 times in 6,140 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    For what it's worth - as the logo/trademark for Warner Bros. was legally registered with the trademark/patent office (see below), doing a search for historical reference there provides this:
    http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfi...h=Submit+Query


    from a 1940's era trademark



    and



    (title: House Hunting Mouse")

    I recall "tunes", not toons, as also apparently so does the patent/trademark database..

    trademark database with original picture:
    http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfi...05:tmt1dr.2.31

  20. Link to Post #71
    UK Avalon Member sunwings's Avatar
    Join Date
    23rd May 2016
    Location
    Barcelona
    Age
    42
    Posts
    689
    Thanks
    3,385
    Thanked 4,936 times in 669 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    Quote Posted by Rachel (here)
    An interesting resource to use when seeing whether a presented Mandela effect is a construct of their own mind, as Star Mariner suggests, or a legit Mandela effect is eBay. The items will show the changed version, while the seller lists it as per their memory of it, and if a search returns a significant number of results, it's reasonable to suggest it's a legit ME. In that case, the differing memories between individuals may suggest they remember different timelines. Looney Toons returns 3,013 results (that includes some Tiny Toons listings) - http://www.ebay.ca/sch/i.html?isRefi...rs=spell_check
    The Sex in the city Ebay page is another great example of peoples memories not matching up with reality.

    http://www.ebay.ca/sch/i.html?_odkw=...+city&_sacat=0

  21. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to sunwings For This Post:

    avid (20th April 2017), BMJ (20th April 2017), Ewan (20th April 2017), Innocent Warrior (20th April 2017), kanishk (21st April 2017), RunningDeer (20th April 2017)

  22. Link to Post #72
    Australia On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    30th October 2014
    Location
    Great Northern Hotel, Twin Peaks.
    Posts
    3,798
    Thanks
    27,120
    Thanked 29,634 times in 3,484 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    Quote I recall "tunes", not toons, as also apparently so does the patent/trademark database..

    trademark database with original picture:
    http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfi...05:tmt1dr.2.31
    Very cool because I vividly remember Looney Toons, I can still see the image of it in my mind and Looney Tunes looks wrong. The next thought you typically have is, well maybe they changed it, but evidently not.

    I've noticed two ways the ME is experienced that's convincing. One being the old version is a vivid memory and the change can't be dismissed. The other being I notice it first, before it's on the internet as a ME, and I think to myself something like, "how odd, I'm sure it was such and such, they must have changed it" and then you see it online and all the others who remember it exactly the same as you did. Some you can dismiss by thinking, well maybe we all sang the lyrics wrong, that happens a lot, but there are all sorts of different changes, so after a few that reasoning doesn't stick so well. Looney Toons is a good one, because we saw it so many times, so I imagine it's quite vivid for a lot of people.
    Never give up on your silly, silly dreams.

    You mustn't be afraid to dream a little BIGGER, darling.

  23. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Innocent Warrior For This Post:

    avid (20th April 2017), Bill Ryan (20th April 2017), BMJ (20th April 2017), Bob (20th April 2017), Ewan (20th April 2017), RunningDeer (20th April 2017), sunwings (20th April 2017)

  24. Link to Post #73
    Scotland Avalon Member Ewan's Avatar
    Join Date
    24th February 2015
    Location
    Ireland
    Age
    63
    Posts
    2,623
    Thanks
    77,481
    Thanked 21,161 times in 2,577 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    Of course it was Toons, I don't know what happened to me yesterday. For some reason I thought Tunes was right, nothing odd about it, hence my query to Bill's post. But once I saw the image(s) posted by RunningDeer I knew it was 'wrong'.

    The film with Bob Hoskins as the private-eye, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, it was all about Toon Town, it has always been Toons. Looney Toons makes sense, tunes does not really.

    It is as though these changes are being done by an AI that doesn't have a full grasp of the language. Interview with the Vampire made a degree of sense, but Interview with A Vampire made more in connection with the actual film. Sex and the City never made much kind of sense, Sex in the City does.

    Has the matrix got a virus?

  25. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Ewan For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (20th April 2017), BMJ (20th April 2017), gaiagirl (20th April 2017), Innocent Warrior (20th April 2017), meat suit (20th April 2017), muxfolder (20th April 2017), RunningDeer (20th April 2017)

  26. Link to Post #74
    Wales Avalon Member meat suit's Avatar
    Join Date
    1st January 2012
    Location
    on the coast
    Language
    German
    Age
    60
    Posts
    1,955
    Thanks
    9,442
    Thanked 11,726 times in 1,877 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    Quote Posted by Ewan (here)
    Of course it was Toons, I don't know what happened to me yesterday. For some reason I thought Tunes was right, nothing odd about it, hence my query to Bill's post. But once I saw the image(s) posted by RunningDeer I knew it was 'wrong'.

    The film with Bob Hoskins as the private-eye, Who Framed Roger Rabbit, it was all about Toon Town, it has always been Toons. Looney Toons makes sense, tunes does not really.

    It is as though these changes are being done by an AI that doesn't have a full grasp of the language. Interview with the Vampire made a degree of sense, but Interview with A Vampire made more in connection with the actual film. Sex and the City never made much kind of sense, Sex in the City does.

    Has the matrix got a virus?
    maybe we are on a dodgy 'backup'

  27. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to meat suit For This Post:

    BMJ (20th April 2017), Ewan (20th April 2017), gaiagirl (20th April 2017), Innocent Warrior (20th April 2017), RunningDeer (20th April 2017), sunwings (20th April 2017)

  28. Link to Post #75
    Avalon Member Flash's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th December 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    9,806
    Thanks
    38,351
    Thanked 55,122 times in 9,108 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    I remember looney toons as well, the cartoon title was in English (not translated), but the cartoon itself was translated into French and I did listen to it when little.

    However, curiously, I still fail to find any Mandela Effect in French itself and I find it very odd. Why wouldn't the Mandela effect be in every language?

    And it is as often found in pictures (like the warlike robot sometimes with a silver leg and sometimes with a gold leg)?


    Quote Posted by Rachel (here)
    Quote I recall "tunes", not toons, as also apparently so does the patent/trademark database..

    trademark database with original picture:
    http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfi...05:tmt1dr.2.31
    Very cool because I vividly remember Looney Toons, I can still see the image of it in my mind and Looney Tunes looks wrong. The next thought you typically have is, well maybe they changed it, but evidently not.

    I've noticed two ways the ME is experienced that's convincing. One being the old version is a vivid memory and the change can't be dismissed. The other being I notice it first, before it's on the internet as a ME, and I think to myself something like, "how odd, I'm sure it was such and such, they must have changed it" and then you see it online and all the others who remember it exactly the same as you did. Some you can dismiss by thinking, well maybe we all sang the lyrics wrong, that happens a lot, but there are all sorts of different changes, so after a few that reasoning doesn't stick so well. Looney Toons is a good one, because we saw it so many times, so I imagine it's quite vivid for a lot of people.
    How to let the desire of your mind become the desire of your heart - Gurdjieff

  29. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    BMJ (20th April 2017), Hervé (20th April 2017), Innocent Warrior (20th April 2017), RunningDeer (20th April 2017)

  30. Link to Post #76
    United States Avalon Member
    Join Date
    14th April 2011
    Age
    60
    Posts
    236
    Thanks
    737
    Thanked 910 times in 194 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    I my memory serves me right. I once was watching "Looney Toons" and thought they could have played with words and named it "Looney Tunes" because the sound track was so "funky".

    The focal point is how is a product called reality defined?

  31. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to AuCo For This Post:

    BMJ (25th April 2017), Flash (21st April 2017), Innocent Warrior (21st April 2017), RunningDeer (21st April 2017)

  32. Link to Post #77
    Australia Avalon Member 7alon's Avatar
    Join Date
    30th August 2016
    Location
    Earth
    Age
    39
    Posts
    552
    Thanks
    2,639
    Thanked 3,611 times in 528 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    Quote Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
    Quote Posted by Ewan (here)
    Sorry, I don't understand. I'm looking at spelling mistakes*, or is this an example of how one word can replace another and forty years from now people will be saying I remember it was Looney Tunes?

    A search on same website for "looney tunes" returns 11 results.

    *assumes said authors never saw a Looney Tunes cartoon in their life and are just guessing based on a more modern parlance of 'toons

    I'm missing something here aren't I?
    Yes. It used to be Looney Toons. (As in cartoons.) Now, it's changed.
    Wait.. it is Looney Tunes now?

    This is gonna sound a little weird btw, but I noticed a moderator here called 'Rachel'. Before I start to forget, in case I do; until today there was no Rachel for me. She isn't the only one either. Marianne was never there either for me.

    Just wanted to say that because I've never experienced something like this just appear to me before (no offense to the people I named, just really shocked). I've had visions of other timelines recently, and somehow I knew what they were and started feeling really sad. I was going to post about it sooner, but it just seemed odd to me and I didn't feel ready to share it, until the above happened today.

    Mod comment from Bill: Rachel used to be Innocent Warrior... see her Avatar, which still shows her old name, to avoid confusion (if possible!). We changed it when she rejoined the mods team a short while ago. It's a core part of the Avalon tradition that all mods have 'real' names, to present a human face to the community at all times.
    Last edited by 7alon; 22nd April 2017 at 02:07.

  33. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to 7alon For This Post:

    Bill Ryan (21st April 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), Chanlo23 (20th April 2017), Flash (21st April 2017), Innocent Warrior (21st April 2017), RunningDeer (21st April 2017)

  34. Link to Post #78
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    23rd June 2013
    Location
    North America
    Age
    73
    Posts
    6,884
    Thanks
    12,723
    Thanked 29,293 times in 6,140 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    Searched the patent/trademark database again today, searched on "Looney Toons" - this was the database reply
    Quote No TESS records were found to match the criteria of your query.
    Then searched the patent/trademark database for "Looney Tunes" - this was the database reply
    Quote 32 Records(s) found (This page: 1 ~ 32)
    The records are as follows (no change from yesterday's search)



    Another "Looney Tunes" image frequently used


    In 1953 this was registered with the US trademark/patent office



    I am familiar with the concept of "quantum track slide". My belief is there is not enough quantum alteration happening atm to induce such slides. I do believe an event horizon matrix opening (not a virus) can appear only during hydrogen bomb explosions, or supernova events. I don't believe we have been near by any supernova events. For what its worth.

  35. Link to Post #79
    Avalon Member Flash's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th December 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    9,806
    Thanks
    38,351
    Thanked 55,122 times in 9,108 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    Quote Posted by Flash (here)
    I remember looney toons as well, the cartoon title was in English (not translated), but the cartoon itself was translated into French and I did listen to it when little.

    However, curiously, I still fail to find any Mandela Effect in French itself and I find it very odd. Why wouldn't the Mandela effect be in every language?

    And it is as often found in pictures (like the warlike robot sometimes with a silver leg and sometimes with a gold leg)?


    Quote Posted by Rachel (here)
    Quote I recall "tunes", not toons, as also apparently so does the patent/trademark database..

    trademark database with original picture:
    http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfi...05:tmt1dr.2.31
    Very cool because I vividly remember Looney Toons, I can still see the image of it in my mind and Looney Tunes looks wrong. The next thought you typically have is, well maybe they changed it, but evidently not.

    I've noticed two ways the ME is experienced that's convincing. One being the old version is a vivid memory and the change can't be dismissed. The other being I notice it first, before it's on the internet as a ME, and I think to myself something like, "how odd, I'm sure it was such and such, they must have changed it" and then you see it online and all the others who remember it exactly the same as you did. Some you can dismiss by thinking, well maybe we all sang the lyrics wrong, that happens a lot, but there are all sorts of different changes, so after a few that reasoning doesn't stick so well. Looney Toons is a good one, because we saw it so many times, so I imagine it's quite vivid for a lot of people.
    I must add something else to this post of mine above.

    This morning , i decided to search for Looney toones but in the French google search, and felt on a site for the most likes cartoons. I punch in 50's and 60's and got l
    Looney toones in it. I thought "wow, just got it, with the original wording, I will post it on avalon, since the French side has not Mandela effect". I came, wrote the post, went back to get the 50's and 60's add for Looney toones and it had become Looney tunes. I truly thought I had crossed eyes, or something, in fact I thought it was the unconscious infuence of this thread that made me see it as Looney Toons at first. I thought "am I going nuts?". I did not dare writing up what I had seen at first, because I really thought I had been influenced and that the actual French add was for Looney Tunes all along, but wishing to see Toons, i had seen it, instead of the real stuff.

    But thinking it over, maybe we are actually creating reality as we go along, changing stuff, therefore the Mandela effect, which is now becoming transparent and fast how creative/reality creating we are.

    To tell the truth, I am confused about this since this morning.
    Last edited by Flash; 21st April 2017 at 05:42.
    How to let the desire of your mind become the desire of your heart - Gurdjieff

  36. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    7alon (21st April 2017), Bill Ryan (21st April 2017), BMJ (25th April 2017), Bob (21st April 2017), Ewan (21st April 2017), Innocent Warrior (21st April 2017), RunningDeer (21st April 2017)

  37. Link to Post #80
    Unsubscribed
    Join Date
    23rd June 2013
    Location
    North America
    Age
    73
    Posts
    6,884
    Thanks
    12,723
    Thanked 29,293 times in 6,140 posts

    Default Re: Research paper on The Mandela Effect: strong statistical evidence

    An original audio track plus the video track, how it opened. It hasn't change for me for as long as I can remember, Tunes, not Toons.. is what continues to come up. I just can't get into the "slide" and experience it as "toons", sorry.. maybe the audio will re-que the original track. The idea of sliding onto the "other track" is intriguing, I will say that.


+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst 1 4 5 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts