My review of Steven Greer's 'Unacknowledged'

[p+52]

Saw Dr. Steven Greer's new film Unacknowledged at the world premier in downtown LA last night (24th). The film packages a significant amount of documented material and eyewitnesses into a well produced, high production value documentary. This is sure to capture significant attention, already being the #1 trailer on iTunes.

The films aim takes into consideration all audience types. So it educates, brings viewers up to date, details the depth of USAPs (Unacknowledged Special Access Programs) and then forecast a likely scenario in which a mass, but false extraterrestrial invasion may be forthcoming. This would have been planned, funded, tested and ultimately rolled out without our consent, with a goal of future unification of the world. 

However his drive to make the film, as he detailed in his talk to the audience, was not to spread fear. Instead he wants to spearhead the development of a grass-roots effort to organize a citizen operated, open-source, safe harbor for the R&D community who were deep into these black programs to showcase (and demonstrate) the result of their work.  He was specific in narrowing this to anti-gravity and free energy systems (although I'm sure it could invite other research). He outlined a scenario contrary to companies like SpaceX where development is tightly guarded and proprietary. But instead (much like the popular open-source development site, Github) the world would be tuned in via live feed 24/7 to witness, for example a zero point energy system working. A lofty idea with good intentions, to ultimately create a revolution of technological advancement in plain sight.

Aside from anyones personal opinions about Dr Greer as a 'researcher', the film WILL have global appeal As many of you know. He currently carries that cache, which cannot be ignored.

But surprisingly absent from his film narrative is the future implications of another growing subject. Namely the secret space program, and the revelations being uncovered of high trafficked bases on the lunar surface and mars. As one who has researched the UFO subject for 30 years, this SSP subject, and its whistleblowers are rapidly coming to light faster than anything i've seen before! But it does not provide a puzzle piece that fits Greer’s Unacknowledged scenario.

The movie will be released on Vimeo, May 9.

Here is the link to buy the stream:
https://vimeo.com/ondemand/unacknowledged

[AutumnW]

Thank you for posting. It sounds like an interesting film. I spoke at length with someone who acted as a media consultant for the original Disclosure project. She (along with others) told Greer to drop the free energy mumbo jumbo as it served to dilute the greater message of alien contact -- at that time. He ignored her advice.

He has gotten nowhere in over 20 years blathering on about exotic energy. Nowhere. Why he persists is anybody's guess. This citizen's initiative, should it get going will put lots of money under his control and provide him with yet more narcissistic supply.

Are you aware that all of the original directors on the board of Cseti have left because they had grave concerns about him?

Fade him. He's a liar.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by AutumnW (here)
Are you aware that all of the original directors on the board of Cseti have left because they had grave concerns about him?

Yes, I can confirm this fully.

[abmqa]

Posted by brianj1400 (here)
Aside from anyones personal opinions about Dr Greer as a 'researcher', the film WILL have global appeal As many of you know. He currently carries that cache, which cannot be ignored.

I agree. This film will do well, not only because of Dr. Greer, but also because of the many credible witnesses / researchers that look to be in the film.

Although I don't agree with Dr. Greer's spin on the disclosure scenario, introducing these witnesses / researchers to an uninformed mainstream audience may offset anything negative that he brings to it.

[p+52]

Posted by AutumnW (here)
He has gotten nowhere in over 20 years blathering on about exotic energy. Nowhere. Why he persists is anybody's guess. This citizen's initiative, should it get going will put lots of money under his control and provide him with yet more narcissistic supply.

Are you aware that all of the original directors on the board of Cseti have left because they had grave concerns about.

I merely want to observe the evolution of his popularity and his message. He is undeniably popular to a mainstream curious audience. His place in UFOlogy, and the growing popularity of Tom Delong is breaking through to mainstream demographics. From my perspective, knowing that there could also be a crafted agenda behind the scenes guiding his message, it is also an important perspective to have in understanding the broader truth.

If it was just some schmo off the street telling lies I wouldn't care, but his popularity is significant and worthy of note. If for no other reason there may be a choreographed message at hand.

[Scott]

Seen the film and I gotta say its good & Bad. Good because of the information that will reach the mass's and bad for the same reason. Its basically "The Greer Show", whats missing are other well known respected UFO researchers who i'm sure wouldn't be caught dead in a Greer production. Greer's unshakable assertions that All aliens are peaceful cuddly fluffy bunnies and all cattle mutilations are a Military program to make the aliens look bad are hotly debated by other credible UFO researchers (More than likely why they are absent from the film).

Greer in the Free Energy field is a joke, he is perhaps acting as a "milkman",identifying people in the free energy field, sucking them dry and never doing anything of actual significance, I have interviewed a few of the big named free energy inventors and to a man they either wouldn't go anywhere near Greer or have outright told him to F#!@ Off

So for the average joe this film is ok but for anyone who has studied UFOs and been involved in Field work on the subject, its a operation in misdirection.

Scott

[section9]

If I may borrow a phrase from Joseph P. Farrell and engage in some "high octane speculation": if you were managing compartmentalization and security for the Secret Space Program and the entire UFO Narrative for the Breakaway crowd, and you recognized that Stephen Greer might not be catching on, you might find someone else to peddle your wares.

Someone younger. Like Tom DeLonge.

Just a cautionary note.

[Honesty]

..........

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by iAMWE (here)
He presents well but serves as a spoiler to advanced energy researchers - we know this first-hand, and Avalon forum mods know that we know.

Yes, we do.

Posted by iAMWE (here)
You would cringe if you knew where most of the funds from his activities actually went, which is one big reason all of us got as far from the Greers as possible a few years ago.

This is important. To risk a summary, to add to iAMWE's: not one thing that Greer says or does can be trusted — and, in various different ways, his claimed information (and the man himself) might be very dangerous.

[Spellbound]

I've never understood his "there are no bad ET's" stance. To me, that's disinfo.

Dave - Toronto

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Spellbound (here)
I've never understood his "there are no bad ET's" stance. To me, that's disinfo.

Yes, of course it is. Worse than disinfo: it's a flat-out lie, and it's propaganda.

Here's a teaser question. To me, the answer is obvious.

Who might that propaganda benefit, or protect?

[Whiskey_Mystic]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by iAMWE (here)
He presents well but serves as a spoiler to advanced energy researchers - we know this first-hand, and Avalon forum mods know that we know.

Yes, we do.

Posted by iAMWE (here)
You would cringe if you knew where most of the funds from his activities actually went, which is one big reason all of us got as far from the Greers as possible a few years ago.

This is important. To risk a summary, to add to iAMWE's: not one thing that Greer says or does can be trusted — and, in various different ways, his claimed information (and the man himself) might be very dangerous.

As I mentioned the last time this came up, Greer changed. He was different when he first appeared on the scene. His personality was more humble. Less brash. Less focused on monetization. His change of physique also indicates changes in lifestyle and focus. Could he be a walk in? A replacement? Tampered with? Who knows. But years ago, he seemed different than the slick con man we see today. And ...there's something unsettling in his field. Like radio static. If you feel uncomfortable just watching or listening to him, then you know what I mean. It's something creepy.

[Cognitive Dissident]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Spellbound (here)
I've never understood his "there are no bad ET's" stance. To me, that's disinfo.

Yes, of course it is. Worse than disinfo: it's a flat-out lie, and it's propaganda.

Here's a teaser question. To me, the answer is obvious.

Who might that propaganda benefit, or protect?

At the risk of sounding really stupid and obvious, it would benefit/protect the "bad ETs" and those on Earth who co-operate with them.

[7alon]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Spellbound (here)
I've never understood his "there are no bad ET's" stance. To me, that's disinfo.

Yes, of course it is. Worse than disinfo: it's a flat-out lie, and it's propaganda.

Here's a teaser question. To me, the answer is obvious.

Who might that propaganda benefit, or protect?

I would say the 'bad aliens' that are working with the elite. What confuses me is, Arthur Neumann said the ones he has seen or spoken with at work are friendly and have a sense of humour. Why would these beings want us to think there are no bad aliens.

I'm actually starting to think there is a good group of humans working with different aliens to the ones that work with the elite. Confusing.

[AutumnW]

Posted by Whiskey_Mystic (here)

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by iAMWE (here)
He presents well but serves as a spoiler to advanced energy researchers - we know this first-hand, and Avalon forum mods know that we know.

Yes, we do.

Posted by iAMWE (here)
You would cringe if you knew where most of the funds from his activities actually went, which is one big reason all of us got as far from the Greers as possible a few years ago.

This is important. To risk a summary, to add to iAMWE's: not one thing that Greer says or does can be trusted — and, in various different ways, his claimed information (and the man himself) might be very dangerous.

As I mentioned the last time this came up, Greer changed. He was different when he first appeared on the scene. His personality was more humble. Less brash. Less focused on monetization. His change of physique also indicates changes in lifestyle and focus. Could he be a walk in? A replacement? Tampered with? Who knows. But years ago, he seemed different than the slick con man we see today. And ...there's something unsettling in his field. Like radio static. If you feel uncomfortable just watching or listening to him, then you know what I mean. It's something creepy.

Greer is a victim of steroids and his own super size ego. His ego has grown in direct proportion to all the fawning and lionizing his 'supporters' throw his way.

I've spoken with the man who introduced him to Woolsey, former CIA director, when he visited my husband. From that conversation it seemed there wasn't much of a clandestine nature going on, just a lot of embarrassment after a simple dinner with friends. *but you NEVER know, in that community, right?* Human nature can also account for a lot of his Messianic histrionics.

Seeing as his encounter groups are based around "vectoring them in," or "calling them down," it makes sense that he would characterize the beings as all positive, light and love.

He's not going to have his followers read David Paulides books and then take them out for alien mind melds or direct experience. Greer may believe they are all positive or HE might be too afraid to go out there himself! So credit where credit's due. Plus he makes money by believing this. It's a coordinated effort of ego and narrow angle mental optics that help service monetary ends.

To dismiss all the negative abduction reports and cattle mutilations as Milabs is belief based and cannot even be substantiated to the degree that it makes sense as an opinion.

And he has been caught lying, big time, as in he probably should be doing jail time.

[TargeT]

Posted by brianj1400 (here)
a well produced, high production value documentary

ANNNNNDDDD I instantly doubt the film now.


If it has the finger prints of the parasites on it; do you think it's safe to consume?

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by AutumnW (here)

Greer is a victim of steroids and his own super size ego. His ego has grown in direct proportion to all the fawning and lionizing his 'supporters' throw his way.

And, I am quite certain: also a victim of something that's totally 100% taken over his body (after his excellent Disclosure Project work in 2001, when he was a tall, skinny beanpole) — and has as its agenda to convince us that there are no bad ETs. Go figure.

[AutumnW]

Absolutely nothing would surprise me. If Greer pulled off his muscle suit onstage to reveal a skinny sixty something, knobby kneed reptoid, I'd probably just yawn and go home.

[Kristin]

Posted by TargeT (here)

If it has the finger prints of the parasites on it; do you think it's safe to consume?

With discernment one may be able to focus upon the eye witness testimony and glean interesting facts there. I will watch the film at some point, but when it's free and open-sourced to the public. The idea that all extraterrestrials are kind and benevolent is plain dangerous. No, I do not trust Greer either and it reminds me of others that are currently being scrutinized (as is appropriate to researching the truth movement).

[AutumnW]

Kristin,

Maybe most ET's are just flat out boring? Not good, not bad, just hyper-cerebral inter-galactic non-entities?