+ Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 16 FirstFirst 1 4 14 16 LastLast
Results 261 to 280 of 319

Thread: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

  1. Link to Post #261
    United States On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    The Seat of Corruption
    Age
    46
    Posts
    9,177
    Thanks
    25,610
    Thanked 53,746 times in 8,696 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Quote Posted by Bruno (here)
    That was some AMAZING cherry picking of data, like. wow! notice how they changed the definition of violence and only focused on "in the home".. well yeah, cuz men die "out of the home" 90% of the time... haha that's just a cluster **** of disinformation and extremely biased.

    ------
    I thought this was a discussion of domestic violence and sexism in Muslim and nonmuslim populations? Not whether men or women get murdered more! Cherry picking? That's rich since you just shared data based on 63 participants opinions?
    "A survey of 63 Muslim leaders showed that 10% of Muslims experienced physical abuse in their homes." (Is the quote I found from your linked article.)
    Quote Posted by Bruno (here)
    Women in North America are still twice as likely to be killed by their husband or intimate partner as they are by a stranger.
    I didn't see anything about domestic violence in there, sorry didn't know you wanted to focus soley on that.

    And the one I linked was 23 family's not 63 (but there was that 63 one in there as well, it wasn't clearly from the US so I didn't include it).

    It's very hard to gather statistics on 1% of 350,000,000 people when they are a fairly recent (in large numbers) addition to the region. That doesn't mean the statistics we do have should be tossed out.

    Quote Posted by Bruno (here)
    Please compare apples to apples. If you can find me a stat that shows that Mosque attending Muslims batter their family members more than Church attending Christians I will be all ears.
    I did, 23 families that moved from Bangladesh to Texas... you don't directly migrate from Bangladesh and NOT attend the mosque..

    Quote Posted by Bruno (here)
    My original point is that if you are worried about immigrants coming here that treat women poorly than you should be worried about the people who have lived here for generations that treat women poorly. It is so hypocritical to be worried about immigrants influencing westerners in this regard.
    Why wouldn't I be worried about both?? that's just not the topic of this thread, and I think I've shown that the "Muslim" issues are more pressing than "woman's rights" at this time.

    I'm not at all worried about islam or muslims influencing the western world.. I am worried about people driving trucks through crowds, shooting randomly in night clubs, or schools etc... I don't see how this isn't a very clear distinction. There is no comparison here.

    Quote Posted by Bruno (here)
    Especially since you (TargeT) don't believe that women have a hard time to begin with.
    I never said that, everyone has a hard time..
    Men are killed 400% more than women. Men represent 92% of on the job fatalities.. Men represent 99.999% of combat deaths. Men are: 76% of homicides – DOJ
    80% of Suicides – CDC
    There are estimated to be over 300,000 male rapes per year in American prisons and jails.
    Meanwhile A United Nations statistical report compiled from government sources showed that more than 250,000 cases of male-female rape or attempted rape were recorded by police annually. The reported data covered 65 countries.

    Or does dying VASTLY MORE (and being raped vastly more) than women not constitute "a hard time"?


    Maybe you see why your anecdotal stories of "my father wouldn't let my mother leave the house" as cute, but not comparable.



    You champion what you feel is an important issue, I get that... I do not focus on any one issue, I prefer the larger picture; and it includes ALL of that, but you have to start somewhere and some things are more pressing than others.



    What I'm concerned about is the Quran, I've read a good portion of it... What I'm concerned about is the historical examples, and by history, I mean like 2 days ago...

    2017.05.14

    Afghanistan, Mehtralam

    Six children between the ages of 6 and 12 are dismembered by Sunni shrapnel.
    Last edited by TargeT; 16th May 2017 at 17:18.
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  2. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    AutumnW (16th May 2017), DNA (17th May 2017), marique3652 (19th May 2017), turiya (16th May 2017)

  3. Link to Post #262
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    4th November 2012
    Posts
    3,270
    Thanks
    6,560
    Thanked 14,521 times in 2,921 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Many of the sites frequented by people who are (perhaps justifiably islamophobic) are agenda driven and emotionally manipulative. There is a problem, granted, but perspective is lost when you immerse yourself in online tabloid style drek. The old, "if it bleeds, it leads," is worth reflecting on.

    Your perspective is best served by remaining calm and assessing threat from a slightly detached perspective. That way propaganda can't get it's hooks into you. Propagandists and manipulators of all types, rely on emotional knee jerk reactions, where threat becomes exaggerated and our reasoning brains take a back seat.

    Propaganda often leverages off of our own life experiences too. Flash, you would be understandably primed to accept questionable information about Islamic threat as true, because it would jive with your own negative experience.

    Propagandists follow the line of least resistance, based on the belief structures and reliable emotional triggers of their Target audience. They ratchet up the storyline from there, in increments. They eventually have you believing EXACTLY what they want.

    My personal take on the Islamic threat is that it is relatively small, relative to other risks. Are their beliefs annoying? For sure? I hate the crapola they believe. I hate that any Muslim mother has ever allowed her daughter to be genitally mutilated. It's repulsive. But...they are no threat to me. And I really do think that the greater society should work on improving itself so it can provide an alternative example that all radicalized individuals can more easily follow.

    We need to be more dignified. We shouldn't be sexually promiscuous, as it ends up in a "hooking up" culture, which commodifies other human beings. We have to live and love in a way that others will want to be more like us. Right now we are no screaming Hell. And if I was an immigrant mother, I would be very worried my child would adopt the mainstream values of the dominant culture, in the U.S and Canada.
    Last edited by AutumnW; 16th May 2017 at 19:05.

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AutumnW For This Post:

    Bruno (17th May 2017), Sierra (17th May 2017), TargeT (16th May 2017)

  5. Link to Post #263
    United States On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    The Seat of Corruption
    Age
    46
    Posts
    9,177
    Thanks
    25,610
    Thanked 53,746 times in 8,696 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Quote Posted by AutumnW (here)
    We need to be more dignified. We shouldn't be sexually promiscuous, as it ends up in a "hooking up" culture, which commodifies other human beings. We have to live and love in a way that others will want to be more like us. Right now we are no screaming Hell.
    When you look at the situation from a Islamic perspective, it's hard not to agree with them... our "culture" is pretty perverse. I'm fine with that view point, just not the actions taken because of it.

    Quote Posted by AutumnW (here)
    And if I was an immigrant mother, I would be very worried my child would adopt the mainstream values of the dominant culture, in the U.S and Canada.
    And here's another reason I cast a dubious eye on Islamic migration to western cultures... we are, to a large majority, literally agents of "Satan" or the Djinn when they view us and how we live our lives.

    Why would you ever go live with Satan if not to thwart him or try to "smite him"? (and they tell us this is the reason they "infiltrate" the infidels....)

    For example:
    Quote chapter 8, verse 12: "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them."


    chapter 9, verse 5: "Slay the idolaters wherever you find them and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush…."


    chapter 5, verse 51 warns Muslims not to befriend Jews and Christians.


    Infiltrating the Infidels
    "Muslims know very well that the best way to conquer is not by the sword anymore," Fadi said.
    "It's by infiltrating the societies, the political systems, and by basically taking their time to grow, to become a majority that at some point, they will have a voice that they can topple things basically to their advantage," he said.
    With The Qur'an Dilemma, Fadi hopes to ensure that never happens.
    http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2011/s.../?mobile=false
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    AutumnW (17th May 2017), Bruno (17th May 2017), DNA (17th May 2017), marique3652 (19th May 2017)

  7. Link to Post #264
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    4th November 2012
    Posts
    3,270
    Thanks
    6,560
    Thanked 14,521 times in 2,921 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    I don't know, Target. The whole,"we are so awful we should protect ourselves from people who are sensitive to the worst aspects of our culture" should best be addressed by changing ourselves, the way we relate to each other.

    And foreign cultures aside, we should do it because it is the right thing to do and it will help us to live better lives. Western culture is so freaking sick. I am so embarrassed by it all. Amd don't get me wrong, I find their religious practices and ,any more things about the Islamic world pretty darned grosse for different reasons.

    You provided a link to CBN, that's the Christian Broadcasting Network and evangelical in nature. Can you see that CBN might have an agenda and might not be the best source of information?

  8. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AutumnW For This Post:

    Bruno (17th May 2017), TargeT (17th May 2017)

  9. Link to Post #265
    United States On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    The Seat of Corruption
    Age
    46
    Posts
    9,177
    Thanks
    25,610
    Thanked 53,746 times in 8,696 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Quote Posted by AutumnW (here)
    I don't know, Target. The whole,"we are so awful we should protect ourselves from people who are sensitive to the worst aspects of our culture" should best be addressed by changing ourselves, the way we relate to each other.
    Yes, but we also live in reality, what you speak of, in the current Zeitgeist; would take what... decades? longer?

    The finish line is the goal, but the next step comes first.

    Quote Posted by AutumnW (here)
    And foreign cultures aside, we should do it because it is the right thing to do and it will help us to live better lives. Western culture is so freaking sick. I am so embarrassed by it all. Amd don't get me wrong, I find their religious practices and ,any more things about the Islamic world pretty darned grosse for different reasons.
    I completely agree, but mixing two ****ed up cultures together and expecting it to go well is just very NOT intelligent. If there are refugees in the middle east, they should go to the middle east, to similar cultures... I would never send a Sunni to a Shiite region (both Islamic, both in Iraq) because they would kill each other (during my first deployment I worked in the largest "detainment" facility in the world; it was in a mostly shiite region and every single prisoner was Sunni.. if they escaped they would be killed or sometimes returned to us).

    This conversation gets stuck in the weeds a lot, to restate my position on this: don't mix oil and water cultures... no judgement on oil or water being worse, they both have their own issues... but why would you take two failing system that at least one is diametrically opposed to the other? I'm much more "ok" with mass Mexican (catholic primarily) immigration, because that's not an oil and water situation.

    Quote Posted by AutumnW (here)
    You provided a link to CBN, that's the Christian Broadcasting Network and evangelical in nature. Can you see that CBN might have an agenda and might not be the best source of information?
    ... this logical fallacy....

    Please tell me how quotes from the Quran and an interview with someone is biased?

    Want other links to the Quran? (btw, my whole point here is that the Quran has an anti-non believer agenda....)

    http://corpus.quran.com/translation....ter=8&verse=12

    http://corpus.quran.com/translation....pter=9&verse=5

    https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur%27an,...th_Non-Muslims

    Skip the mental shortcut and address the data, the source is meaningless... Ignore the entire interview if you want, just read the passages from the Quran...

    The situation should stay static till we both work out our issues.
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    DNA (17th May 2017), marique3652 (19th May 2017)

  11. Link to Post #266
    Avalon Member Flash's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th December 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    9,825
    Thanks
    38,372
    Thanked 55,293 times in 9,131 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Target, again with your false stats - how do you f.. do it to find stats and skew them completely

    Quote Or does dying VASTLY MORE (and being raped vastly more) than women not constitute "a hard time"?
    THIS IS INCREDIBLE.

    Where did you take those skewed stats - how did you proceed to be sooooooooo closed minded when it comes to violence against women

    World stats, all over, show that on average 25% of women have been raped at least once in their life.

    Now 7 billions divided by 2 ( I am generous cause past 30 there is more women than men), = 3,5 billion women from which 25% (divided by 4 ) = 800 million75 that have been raped.
    So now, once and for all, tell yourself that you are completely beserk when it comes to women stats, women feeling, women lives and violence versus women and avoid a topic in which you are completely off. You would look much better

    Now, if i extrapolate, are all your information as beserk and skewed. I should never ever read you, no more than I should Corey Goodie????? This is the feeling I get.

    (not to undervalue violence against men, but definitley it is 2 weights 2 measures that you are using)
    <
    By the way, those creating wars die have their counterparts die in it, those that fills the jails get raped (moslty men in jail - but I bet that as many women get raped in women jails), etc etc.

    This is the last straw, I will never believe again anything you post.

    Quote Posted by TargeT (here)
    Quote Posted by Bruno (here)
    That was some AMAZING cherry picking of data, like. wow! notice how they changed the definition of violence and only focused on "in the home".. well yeah, cuz men die "out of the home" 90% of the time... haha that's just a cluster **** of disinformation and extremely biased.

    ------
    I thought this was a discussion of domestic violence and sexism in Muslim and nonmuslim populations? Not whether men or women get murdered more! Cherry picking? That's rich since you just shared data based on 63 participants opinions?
    "A survey of 63 Muslim leaders showed that 10% of Muslims experienced physical abuse in their homes." (Is the quote I found from your linked article.)
    Quote Posted by Bruno (here)
    Women in North America are still twice as likely to be killed by their husband or intimate partner as they are by a stranger.
    I didn't see anything about domestic violence in there, sorry didn't know you wanted to focus soley on that.

    And the one I linked was 23 family's not 63 (but there was that 63 one in there as well, it wasn't clearly from the US so I didn't include it).

    It's very hard to gather statistics on 1% of 350,000,000 people when they are a fairly recent (in large numbers) addition to the region. That doesn't mean the statistics we do have should be tossed out.

    Quote Posted by Bruno (here)
    Please compare apples to apples. If you can find me a stat that shows that Mosque attending Muslims batter their family members more than Church attending Christians I will be all ears.
    I did, 23 families that moved from Bangladesh to Texas... you don't directly migrate from Bangladesh and NOT attend the mosque..

    Quote Posted by Bruno (here)
    My original point is that if you are worried about immigrants coming here that treat women poorly than you should be worried about the people who have lived here for generations that treat women poorly. It is so hypocritical to be worried about immigrants influencing westerners in this regard.
    Why wouldn't I be worried about both?? that's just not the topic of this thread, and I think I've shown that the "Muslim" issues are more pressing than "woman's rights" at this time.

    I'm not at all worried about islam or muslims influencing the western world.. I am worried about people driving trucks through crowds, shooting randomly in night clubs, or schools etc... I don't see how this isn't a very clear distinction. There is no comparison here.

    Quote Posted by Bruno (here)
    Especially since you (TargeT) don't believe that women have a hard time to begin with.
    I never said that, everyone has a hard time..
    Men are killed 400% more than women. Men represent 92% of on the job fatalities.. Men represent 99.999% of combat deaths. Men are: 76% of homicides – DOJ
    80% of Suicides – CDC
    There are estimated to be over 300,000 male rapes per year in American prisons and jails.
    Meanwhile A United Nations statistical report compiled from government sources showed that more than 250,000 cases of male-female rape or attempted rape were recorded by police annually. The reported data covered 65 countries.

    Or does dying VASTLY MORE (and being raped vastly more) than women not constitute "a hard time"?


    Maybe you see why your anecdotal stories of "my father wouldn't let my mother leave the house" as cute, but not comparable.



    You champion what you feel is an important issue, I get that... I do not focus on any one issue, I prefer the larger picture; and it includes ALL of that, but you have to start somewhere and some things are more pressing than others.



    What I'm concerned about is the Quran, I've read a good portion of it... What I'm concerned about is the historical examples, and by history, I mean like 2 days ago...

    2017.05.14

    Afghanistan, Mehtralam

    Six children between the ages of 6 and 12 are dismembered by Sunni shrapnel.
    How to let the desire of your mind become the desire of your heart - Gurdjieff

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    Bruno (17th May 2017), Sierra (17th May 2017)

  13. Link to Post #267
    United States On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    The Seat of Corruption
    Age
    46
    Posts
    9,177
    Thanks
    25,610
    Thanked 53,746 times in 8,696 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Quote Posted by Flash (here)
    Target, again with your false stats - how do you f.. do it to find stats and skew them completely

    Quote Or does dying VASTLY MORE (and being raped vastly more) than women not constitute "a hard time"?
    THIS IS INCREDIBLE.

    Where did you take those skewed stats - how did you proceed to be sooooooooo closed minded when it comes to violence against women
    What would you say im being closed minded about exactly? I never said there is no violence against women, simply more against men (and how is that not just "common sense")?

    Where did I get those Skewed stats? DOJ (Department of Justice) CDC (Center for Disease Control) all those words that are blue in my posts are links to the sources... I very purposefully do that to avoid questions like you just asked

    Quote Posted by Flash (here)
    World stats, all over, show that on average 25% of women have been raped at least once in their life.
    Can you source that?

    Because I've read a lot of wild numbers that have been debunked over the years.. like college girls are more at risk of rape , when in reality NON-college females are 25% MORE likely to be raped

    I don't care who lies to me or about what.. I dont like it. Manipulation of others is pretty F'd up... and this is an emotional manipulation topic... clearly evidenced by the constant derailments of this thread.

    Quote Posted by Flash (here)
    So now, once and for all, tell yourself that you are completely beserk when it comes to women stats, women feeling, women lives and violence versus women and avoid a topic in which you are completely off. You would look much better
    ahhh, you mean the CDC and DOJ are completely berserk when it comes to women stats?

    I'm not making this up, I'm reading it, and absorbing it for future use. Now granted the DOJ and CDC are not "penultimate" sources in my mind, but they are fairly reliable.

    Quote Posted by Flash (here)
    Now, if i extrapolate, are all your information as beserk and skewed. I should never ever read you, no more than I should Corey Goodie????? This is the feeling I get.
    You mean the CDC and DOJ?

    Do I get lynched with those orginizations because I repeated what they did studies on?



    Quote Posted by Flash (here)
    This is the last straw, I will never believe again anything you post.
    I never asked you to.

    In fact, I would hope that NO ONE "believes" what I say ever... do your OWN research...


    but actually research, and maybe read my posts for what they are, not what you project on them.

    I re-iterate, none of those stats are mine, I sourced them in the post you quoted....


    Please start a "women are victims" thread if you choose, we can discuss this topic there; actually, don't do that. I don't think you are prepared to have a conversation on this topic unless all participants agree with you.

    Looks like one of the links above is broke.. since your being so cagey I won't edit the original post, I'll post a different link here:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...ual-abuse.html
    Last edited by TargeT; 17th May 2017 at 01:03.
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  14. Link to Post #268
    United States Avalon Member Chester's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th December 2011
    Location
    into my third life within this one
    Language
    English
    Age
    68
    Posts
    6,073
    Thanks
    34,014
    Thanked 33,314 times in 5,699 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Quote Posted by Bruno (here)
    I have seen numerous posts on Project Avalon recently about the sexist and abusive practices of Muslims and concerns about Sharia law becoming law in Western Nations. In general I think these concerns are fear mongering. While I do not want to allow Islamic extremists into my country neither do I want Christian extremists. It's not that I don't think people shouldn't be concerned about the ability of Islamic refugees to meld into society and that all people coming into my country of Canada should be willing to share our values. I just find in general that people seem quite hypocritical when they are talking about the poor treatment of Muslim women by their partners in one post and then in another talking about western feminism as a pysop meant to bring down society. You can't have it both ways. My own father who is part Native and who's European ancestors have been here for 5 generations wouldn't let my mother go back to school or work outside the home.
    I believe I have identified what seems to be a difference. In my experience, I don't condone and, personally do not know (because I wouldn't care to associate with) anyone who condones any of the behaviors you mentioned above that are done by folks who happen to not be Muslim.

    The thing that I have observed which is not at all "fear mongering" is that there seems to be far, far too many of those in various positions of power, whether they be a politician, or someone in media who has weight, or a business leader of notoriety going to great lengths to defend and protect those who do these terrible things that happen to be Muslim.

    Please read carefully what I am suggesting appears to be the case. So many of these horrors are done by all sorts of humans of all sorts of ethnic or cultural backgrounds, religious backgrounds, nationalities, colors, genders (admittedly far more males but not exclusively males), sexual orientations, gender orientations yet you do not see the massive protective mechanisms defending so much of these atrocities near like we experience nowadays if "anything Muslim" is also associated with the picture.

    Here is a great example -

    Student Journalist Fired for Tweeting Video of Muslim Panelist’s Comments on Non-Believers Under Koranic Law

    Student journalist Andy Ngo was fired from his job at the Vanguard, the student newspaper of Portland State University, after a video he posted on Twitter was included in a Breitbart News report.

    Student journalist Andy Ngo, a graduate student at Portland State University, was fired from his job at the school’s student newspaper after a video he tweeted of a campus interfaith panel was included in a report from Breitbart News.

    The video, which went viral on social media, showed a Muslim student stating that non-believers, or apostates, would either be banished or killed in countries run under Islamic law.

    “That is only considered a crime when the country is based on Koranic law,” the student said, speaking about the legality of being a non-believer in an Islamic country. “That means there is no other law than the Koran. So in that case, you are given the liberty to leave the country. You can go to a different country. I am not going to sugarcoat it. So if you go to a different country…but in a Muslim country, a country based on Koranic law, disbelieving or being an infidel, is not allowed, so you will be given the choice.”


    ...and so here we have a video of a panel where a Muslim states a fact that he knows is true (being a Muslim himself) and the journalist tweeted the video and is then fired from his position as a journalist for the Portland State University Vanguard.

    I would bet this same journalist... if he had come upon a video of testimony from a daughter of a woman whose husband (the daughter's father) was of mixed Native American and European ancestry and had oppressed his wife to the degree she would not be allowed to go back to school or work outside the home... that he certainly would not have been fired and instead he may have been applauded for his investigative journalism.

    THIS is the problem... we cannot TALK about the problem... AT ALL.

    And because of this mind blowing protection blanket wrapped around anything Muslim, you cannot even point out real horrific acts! Real horrific practices. And in addition... you cannot at all touch any single "dot connector" regarding these behaviors if in any way that touches Muslim or any national identifier where the nation is known to be predominantly Muslim.

    Its OFF limits.

    and so I wish all our children from all families, cultures, nations, religions, genders, etc. etc...

    Goooood Luck!
    Last edited by Chester; 17th May 2017 at 17:59.
    All the above is all and only my opinion - all subject to change and not meant to be true for anyone else regardless of how I phrase it.

  15. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Chester For This Post:

    Bruno (17th May 2017), Helene West (17th May 2017), JRS (17th May 2017), marique3652 (19th May 2017), TargeT (17th May 2017), turiya (17th May 2017)

  16. Link to Post #269
    Avalon Member Flash's Avatar
    Join Date
    26th December 2010
    Location
    Montreal
    Posts
    9,825
    Thanks
    38,372
    Thanked 55,293 times in 9,131 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Here the USA stats dating late 1990's

    I may have been a bit off (i do not think I am for the 2018's), but nevertheless, the difference between male and female is striking.

    17 million women raped or attempted rape, 1 in 6
    2 million men raped or attempted rape.

    What I do not like in your stats Target are not the stats themselves, but the way you use them to make false deductions and false conclusions, to win your point.

    I definitively cannot trust your conclusions, and this, on many topics. Sometimes I wonder if you do not do this on purpose te create discontent and bad vipes on the forum.

    I have seen crooked researchers doing the same with their research, they usually work at Monsanto and ini the Pharmaceutical industries.

    https://www.rainn.org/statistics/vic...exual-violence
    How to let the desire of your mind become the desire of your heart - Gurdjieff

  17. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Flash For This Post:

    Bruno (17th May 2017), marique3652 (19th May 2017), onawah (18th May 2017)

  18. Link to Post #270
    United States On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    The Seat of Corruption
    Age
    46
    Posts
    9,177
    Thanks
    25,610
    Thanked 53,746 times in 8,696 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Quote Posted by Flash (here)
    I definitively cannot trust your conclusions, and this, on many topics. Sometimes I wonder if you do not do this on purpose te create discontent and bad vipes on the forum.
    I have seen crooked researchers doing the same with their research, they usually work at Monsanto and ini the Pharmaceutical industries.
    Well I work for the military industrial complex, how is that not worse

    <-- that picture is of me in my Army uniform

    I think your clearly biased, watch the red pill, at least expose your self to "the other side" a little.. and clearly from someone other than me (haha) since your so biased against me.


    Quote Posted by Sam Hunter (here)
    THIS is the problem... we cannot TALK about the problem... AT ALL.

    And because of this mind blowing protection blanket wrapped around anything Muslim, you cannot even point out real horrific acts! Real horrific practices. And in addition... you cannot at all touch any single "dot connector" regarding these behaviors if in any way that touches Muslim or any national identifier where the nation is known to be predominantly Muslim.

    Its OFF limits.
    Same with free energy (though you wouldn't be fired, just character assassinated)

    Same with LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ

    Same with Racism

    Same with Sexism

    Same with 9/11-Kennedy-SSP-etc.... (though you wouldn't be fired, just character assassinated)

    See the pattern? Every strong divide and conquer tactic has a built in self defense mechanism, it's a mind virus that protects itself viciously (we've seen that here on this very thread!). This is what I think a lot of conspiracy or "their actions" really boil down to.. "they" don't need to do anything since these mind viruses seem to work on us so well. We will pick it up and run with it, and defend it with vigor.

    Not being able to even discuss these topics makes them unsolvable, and while there is encouragement from media / culture to up hold this status-quo; it doesn't seem like any direct effort is needed to "enforce" it (though there are direct efforts on racism, sexism and Islamophobia in the form of laws etc in various countries). We enforce it on ourselves.

    Since there is a pattern we should be able to analyze it and come up with commonalities between the "un-discussable" topics; those already deeply embedded will have to fight their own way out but perhaps preventing more from getting sucked in is possible. There's got to be an "Achilles heel" to these types of memes.
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  19. The Following User Says Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    marique3652 (19th May 2017)

  20. Link to Post #271
    Canada Avalon Member Bruno's Avatar
    Join Date
    9th December 2016
    Location
    Southern Ontario, Canada
    Age
    53
    Posts
    185
    Thanks
    10,751
    Thanked 995 times in 176 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    This thread is important Sam. There is much important discussion. In no way am I saying it's racist to point out the truth, that being that many (not all) Muslims have different values then "white" Americans. (Sharia law would only enter Canada over my dead body and the body of many Canadians.) I was trying to point out the hypocrisy of people spreading fear about Muslim immigrants bringing their sexist and violent attitudes to the West on this thread and then on others denying that there is even a need for feminism or that feminism its self is a pysop.

  21. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Bruno For This Post:

    AutumnW (17th May 2017), Chester (17th May 2017), marique3652 (19th May 2017), Sierra (17th May 2017)

  22. Link to Post #272
    United States Avalon Retired Member
    Join Date
    18th September 2016
    Posts
    1,062
    Thanks
    2,208
    Thanked 5,371 times in 1,011 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    In reading the above several posts it has me reflecting on the short time I've been on this board, particularly in regard to expressing oneself and accusations of twisting things, demanding proof and back-up, etc.

    I've come to maybe a kooky conclusion - the people who may accuse you of twisting, manipulating info or want back-up of your views - those are the people to least give them to!

    So I write something - someone says, no way, they want back-up of that. Hmmm, now i'm supposed to give my time and energy when I have a sneaky suspicion I know what will happen - you give them their proof - and they reject it! They find fault with it. LOL. and it could go on back and forth forever like that.

    This society has become so divergent that I see a need for a new specialty genre in the professions - that of some type of cultural Liaison or Negotiators, and I mean a rigorous specialty with study in the Art of Impartiality AND sworn to never run for public office as a politician.

    There is a reason it is one of the Beatitudes, blessed are the Peacemakers for they shall see God. Humans are not wired to be impartial, to do things like researching data points to support views that go against their world view and experience! We can't do it. It takes very unusual people.

    I think it was late '70s early '80s a psychologist became famous for writing a book called Games People Play. He had patients suffering from depression to cancer, etc. His conclusion after many years of practice - that many humans would rather die than change! Even when the way they think was killing them, they would resist tooth and nail suggestions that their thinking was off and not serving them.

    No one is twisting anything here, we're doing what we're wired to do, find support for our world view and experience.

    ==Edit== Games People Play about transactional analysis by Eric Berne
    Last edited by Sierra; 17th May 2017 at 18:11.

  23. The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Helene West For This Post:

    AutumnW (17th May 2017), Bruno (17th May 2017), marique3652 (19th May 2017), Sierra (17th May 2017), TargeT (17th May 2017), Whiskey_Mystic (19th May 2017)

  24. Link to Post #273
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    4th November 2012
    Posts
    3,270
    Thanks
    6,560
    Thanked 14,521 times in 2,921 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Quote Posted by TargeT (here)
    Quote Posted by AutumnW (here)
    We need to be more dignified. We shouldn't be sexually promiscuous, as it ends up in a "hooking up" culture, which commodifies other human beings. We have to live and love in a way that others will want to be more like us. Right now we are no screaming Hell.
    When you look at the situation from a Islamic perspective, it's hard not to agree with them... our "culture" is pretty perverse. I'm fine with that view point, just not the actions taken because of it.

    Quote Posted by AutumnW (here)
    And if I was an immigrant mother, I would be very worried my child would adopt the mainstream values of the dominant culture, in the U.S and Canada.
    And here's another reason I cast a dubious eye on Islamic migration to western cultures... we are, to a large majority, literally agents of "Satan" or the Djinn when they view us and how we live our lives.

    Why would you ever go live with Satan if not to thwart him or try to "smite him"? (and they tell us this is the reason they "infiltrate" the infidels....)

    For example:
    Quote chapter 8, verse 12: "I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them."


    chapter 9, verse 5: "Slay the idolaters wherever you find them and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush…."


    chapter 5, verse 51 warns Muslims not to befriend Jews and Christians.


    Infiltrating the Infidels
    "Muslims know very well that the best way to conquer is not by the sword anymore," Fadi said.
    "It's by infiltrating the societies, the political systems, and by basically taking their time to grow, to become a majority that at some point, they will have a voice that they can topple things basically to their advantage," he said.
    With The Qur'an Dilemma, Fadi hopes to ensure that never happens.
    http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/us/2011/s.../?mobile=false
    You make many good points in your post and I don't even have to read the quotes from the Quran. I know how awful they are. I know it's a bloody minded horrible book, bent on extreme exclusivity. I just don't think the majority of Muslims are radicalized to the extent they would take the whole of it that seriously. Just like Christians, even most fundamentalists, wouldn't sanction killing people because they are of another faith.

    But I DO understand your feelings about potential risk of terrorism. I just can't determine what those risks are. They seem low to me but I could be mistaken. It seems to me the U.S is pretty darned careful about who it lets into the country, particularly if they are from the Middle East.

  25. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to AutumnW For This Post:

    Bruno (18th May 2017), TargeT (17th May 2017)

  26. Link to Post #274
    United States Avalon Member Chester's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th December 2011
    Location
    into my third life within this one
    Language
    English
    Age
    68
    Posts
    6,073
    Thanks
    34,014
    Thanked 33,314 times in 5,699 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Quote Posted by Bruno (here)
    This thread is important Sam. There is much important discussion. In no way am I saying it's racist to point out the truth, that being that many (not all) Muslims have different values then "white" Americans. (Sharia law would only enter Canada over my dead body and the body of many Canadians.) I was trying to point out the hypocrisy of people spreading fear about Muslim immigrants bringing their sexist and violent attitudes to the West on this thread and then on others denying that there is even a need for feminism or that feminism its self is a pysop.
    Ahhhh... OK. And now this is clearer (your goal), yet you might not like my own take on "feminism." This is because from my own experience with and investigation into the movement of "feminism" (as it has become)... the movement which most of us experience today, "feminism" holds to tenants that have been developed over the last fifty years to do anything but what the original and quite virtuous goals of "women's lib" (as we experienced arising in the 60s) rightfully sought.

    What "feminism" today appears to be to folks like me is not only something that is harmful to women and women's rights but harmful to all human beings as a whole... whether that human was born physically female or male, who, if they enjoy any sexual activity in any way may choose the opposite "sex" (meaning gender) to participate with, may choose the same sex or may enjoy both, sometimes more than one or may simply have attractions or inclinations in any of those directions but have never acted upon these inclinations, maybe have no interest in sex and then those who decide to manipulate their own physically born gender to fit more with the gender they currently identify to be just because gender and/or sexual matters are linked to gender identity...

    ...in other words all humans fit somewhere in this description... and then there are the issues that "feminism" weaponized which may or may not have anything to do with the above breakdown of the human makeup but which often was linked to real issues whereby people's views would be hijacked through the human inclination to "identify" and thus then groupify. This creates factions and divisions where none need be. And yet this has been the result of "feminism" and its related offshoots of "radical fiminism" and results in new labels such as "feminazi" becoming further polarizing buzzwords....

    just like "radical Islam" and on and on...

    My opinion as to what I have experienced and thus concluded (for now as I always hold the right to change my mind partially or fully at any time) is that "feminism" (today's version) wishes the public to believe it acts as an "SJW" (social justice warrior) to make things better for woman (and all) but there is also quite a bit of evidence that the "feminist movement" was indeed funded by some of the infamous "elite" and their economically advantaged foundations along with friends in "deep state" / "three letter" agencies to ensure that the movement went the intended direction and enjoyed an increased probability to succeed in the form desired - which succeeded in producing today's version of "feminism."

    see -

    http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/la...-woman-young-2

    http://www.rense.com/general21/hw.htm

    http://rense.com/general75/how.htm

    https://jaysanalysis.com/2015/02/21/...roll-feminism/
    Last edited by Chester; 19th May 2017 at 01:55.
    All the above is all and only my opinion - all subject to change and not meant to be true for anyone else regardless of how I phrase it.

  27. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Chester For This Post:

    Bruno (18th May 2017), marique3652 (19th May 2017)

  28. Link to Post #275
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    4th November 2012
    Posts
    3,270
    Thanks
    6,560
    Thanked 14,521 times in 2,921 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Quote Posted by Bruno (here)
    This thread is important Sam. There is much important discussion. In no way am I saying it's racist to point out the truth, that being that many (not all) Muslims have different values then "white" Americans. (Sharia law would only enter Canada over my dead body and the body of many Canadians.) I was trying to point out the hypocrisy of people spreading fear about Muslim immigrants bringing their sexist and violent attitudes to the West on this thread and then on others denying that there is even a need for feminism or that feminism its self is a pysop.
    Thanks for your input, Bruno. I look forward to reading your posts on any and all subjects. And thanks to Sam for starting the thread!

    I want to point out something important here. It is REALLY important that those familiar with Canadian hate speech understand the subtext. The media in Canada, last time I checked was 80% Jewish owned. This has meant, historically, that you CANNOT say anything against Israel, as a reporter, or you will be fired. I know more than one individual in the media and this is their primary beef. They are not allowed to report stories with accuracy. It is not explicitly stated, upon termination, of course, but that is exactly what happens.

    Before hate speech laws were inacted, particularly where Muslims were concerned, Canada was operating in a media atmosphere where Israel could not be criticized, but everybody else was fair game. Had those laws not been put in place, you would have had a Jewish media with a strong pro Israel bias, editing out all criticism of Israel, in an atmosphere where demonizing other ethnic groups would have been legally protected under "free speech."

    So it's complicated and 'freedom' creates many paradoxes.

    The Portland Islamic student who made the statements about the killing of those who have a different religion should have had his ass flown directly back to his country of origin, IMHO.

    Bruno, under our hate speech laws, would this POS student have suffered any consequences? Would the university have come under scrutiny? This isn't freedom of speech. The student is using the American freedoms (such as they are) to endorse am extreme curtailment of freedom...to the point of endorsing murder.

  29. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AutumnW For This Post:

    Bruno (18th May 2017), marique3652 (19th May 2017), Sierra (17th May 2017)

  30. Link to Post #276
    United States Avalon Member Chester's Avatar
    Join Date
    15th December 2011
    Location
    into my third life within this one
    Language
    English
    Age
    68
    Posts
    6,073
    Thanks
    34,014
    Thanked 33,314 times in 5,699 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Quote Posted by AutumnW (here)
    Bruno, under our hate speech laws, would this POS student have suffered any consequences? Would the university have come under scrutiny? This isn't freedom of speech. The student is using the American freedoms (such as they are) to endorse am extreme curtailment of freedom...to the point of endorsing murder.
    I sense the above was a misunderstanding of what the student had actually done... and I have placed this here for clarification purposes only for readers who might be catching up through this material after the fact... [see Autumn's reply a bit further on where she clarifies the misunderstanding].

    Quote Posted by AutumnW (here)
    The Portland Islamic student who made the statements about the killing of those who have a different religion should have had his ass flown directly back to his country of origin, IMHO.
    Forgive me, Autumn, but I don't think we could have watched the same video...

    ...or, I missed something or terribly misunderstood something.

    I will now review the video again.




    OK, I am back... and note, I had watched that video four times prior to posting above and now two more times...

    - what you are suggesting this student stated is not at all what he stated.

    What he stated is actually happening right now in places like Pakistan -

    http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank...and-blasphemy/

    Quote Last December [2015], for instance, authorities in Sudan charged 25 men for apostasy – the act of abandoning one’s faith — including by converting to another religion. The men face the death penalty for following a different interpretation of Islam than the one sanctioned by the government.
    This probably brave young man stated fact and he is a Muslim... probably what others would "call" "a moderate Muslim" and if his ass was sent back to his country he may likely be facing the same fate as the twenty five men mentioned in the above quote.
    Last edited by Chester; 19th May 2017 at 01:58.
    All the above is all and only my opinion - all subject to change and not meant to be true for anyone else regardless of how I phrase it.

  31. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Chester For This Post:

    Bruno (18th May 2017), marique3652 (19th May 2017), Sierra (17th May 2017), TargeT (17th May 2017)

  32. Link to Post #277
    United States On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    The Seat of Corruption
    Age
    46
    Posts
    9,177
    Thanks
    25,610
    Thanked 53,746 times in 8,696 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Quote Posted by AutumnW (here)
    But I DO understand your feelings about potential risk of terrorism. I just can't determine what those risks are. They seem low to me but I could be mistaken. It seems to me the U.S is pretty darned careful about who it lets into the country, particularly if they are from the Middle East.
    And even as careful as we are... for example, in the last 5-7 years or so:

    we let in the underwear bomber (IMO probably a patsy.. but no proof)

    We let in the Boston marathon bombers

    We let in people from the San Bernadino school shooting

    We let the Minnesota mall stabber in

    we let in the Ohio state staber

    we let in the chattanooga shooter

    And that list doubles if you include 2nd generation Muslims or Islamic converts inside the US.

    Now I do agree this is a fairly small number of fatalities, we have much more dangerous issues to deal with with in our own boarders.. but we don't need to pull an Europe and bring in more trouble... we have our own issues already.. haha

    Quote Posted by Sam Hunter (here)
    Quote Posted by AutumnW (here)
    The Portland Islamic student who made the statements about the killing of those who have a different religion should have had his ass flown directly back to his country of origin, IMHO.
    Forgive me, Autumn, but I don't think we could have watched the same video...
    I'll assume she just read what you wrote... it could be taken that way with out reviewing the article.
    Last edited by TargeT; 17th May 2017 at 18:56.
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  33. The Following User Says Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    marique3652 (19th May 2017)

  34. Link to Post #278
    Canada Avalon Member
    Join Date
    4th November 2012
    Posts
    3,270
    Thanks
    6,560
    Thanked 14,521 times in 2,921 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Quote Posted by Sam Hunter (here)
    Quote Posted by AutumnW (here)
    The Portland Islamic student who made the statements about the killing of those who have a different religion should have had his ass flown directly back to his country of origin, IMHO.
    Forgive me, Autumn, but I don't think we could have watched the same video...

    ...or, I missed something or terribly misunderstood something.

    I will now review the video again.




    OK, I am back... and note, I had watched that video four times prior to posting above and now two more times...

    - what you are suggesting this student stated is not at all what he stated.

    What he stated is actually happening right now in places like Pakistan -

    http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank...and-blasphemy/

    Quote Last December [2015], for instance, authorities in Sudan charged 25 men for apostasy – the act of abandoning one’s faith — including by converting to another religion. The men face the death penalty for following a different interpretation of Islam than the one sanctioned by the government.
    This probably brave young man stated fact and he is a Muslim... probably what others would "call" "a moderate Muslim" and if his ass was sent back to his country he may likely be facing the same fate as the twenty five men mentioned in the above quote.
    Oh, my bad! I shouldn't speed read subjects that require me to slooooowwww down. From now on consider me the sloth in Zootopia.

  35. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AutumnW For This Post:

    Bruno (18th May 2017), Chester (17th May 2017), TargeT (17th May 2017)

  36. Link to Post #279
    United States Administrator ThePythonicCow's Avatar
    Join Date
    4th January 2011
    Location
    North Texas
    Language
    English
    Age
    78
    Posts
    30,881
    Thanks
    37,870
    Thanked 155,105 times in 23,737 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Quote Posted by Paul (here)
    Sierra and Dennis - two of the finest - it's been my pleasure and honor to serve with them.

    I wish them both the best in their renewed focus elsewhere.

    Until we meet again ...
    Well, well. Fancy meeting Sierra again so soon. She's back in the backroom with the rest of us mods and admins!
    Welcome back, Sierra !

    Now before I get in trouble with Bill for my off topic posts.
    My quite dormant website: pauljackson.us

  37. The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to ThePythonicCow For This Post:

    Atlas (19th May 2017), Bruno (18th May 2017), Chester (17th May 2017), Foxie Loxie (18th May 2017), marique3652 (19th May 2017), Mike (17th May 2017), Whiskey_Mystic (19th May 2017)

  38. Link to Post #280
    United States On Sabbatical
    Join Date
    30th June 2011
    Location
    The Seat of Corruption
    Age
    46
    Posts
    9,177
    Thanks
    25,610
    Thanked 53,746 times in 8,696 posts

    Default Re: Trump - "Illegal" immigration - Sam's view

    Quote Posted by TargeT (here)
    Quote Posted by AutumnW (here)
    But I DO understand your feelings about potential risk of terrorism. I just can't determine what those risks are. They seem low to me but I could be mistaken. It seems to me the U.S is pretty darned careful about who it lets into the country, particularly if they are from the Middle East.
    And even as careful as we are... for example, in the last 5-7 years or so:

    we let in the underwear bomber (IMO probably a patsy.. but no proof)

    We let in the Boston marathon bombers

    We let in people from the San Bernadino school shooting

    We let the Minnesota mall stabber in

    we let in the Ohio state staber

    we let in the chattanooga shooter

    And that list doubles if you include 2nd generation Muslims or Islamic converts inside the US.

    Wow, Point, set, match?

    Turkish body guards assault peaceful protestors and send several to the hospital, then claim self defense.... and these are GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS of an Islamic country...




    I never thought I would see something like this in the US.

    This enrages me... this is why I will always inform people of what can happen with this culture.
    Hard times create strong men, Strong men create good times, Good times create weak men, Weak men create hard times.
    Where are you?

  39. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TargeT For This Post:

    Atlas (19th May 2017), Chester (19th May 2017)

+ Reply to Thread
Page 14 of 16 FirstFirst 1 4 14 16 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts