David Icke Debunked (Full Movie)

[Transdimensional Bean Pod]

Posted by Banshee (here)
Look, everyone is entitled to their opinion. It is no secret that the ADL has been targeting Mr. Icke for years.

I have no issues with the Jews. I do have issue with Zionism, as do most when educated on the subject.

You are more than entitled to disagree with anything I have to say, however, I don't have the time or the patience to argue minutia. If it is your intent to drag out old posts and start asking for retractions from everyone here, you are going be one busy little bean.

Have a nice day!

Of course to YOU it's minutia. That's kind of the point. You don't care.

Loverly!

It's always good to be insulated from the results of your scapegoating. Wouldn't be nearly as much fun otherwise.

[Orobo]

Hey this does not sound good at all.
Either use a quote, so everyone can follow you ( if one cares to, with such a tone) or PM and keep the thread clean from these attitudes, please.

love-O

[Lord Sidious]

I am not a fan of David Icke. That being said, I don't usually agree with anyone 100% and I don't expect too, but the thing I do credit him with is igniting or uncovering that spark in people that changes their way of thinking and they then go out and start to see, rather than just look.
So, if nothing else, he is helping to start people on their own journey and he should be credited for that at least.

[Transdimensional Bean Pod]

Posted by Orobo (here)
Hey this does not sound good at all.
Either use a quote, so everyone can follow you ( if one cares to, with such a tone) or PM and keep the thread clean from these attitudes, please.

love-O

You could have PM'd me that.

I'm not interested in your opinion of how I 'sound'.

And the fact you care more about quote functions (how ever did we message boarders survive before the function!) than the point I was making, tells me all I need to know about you.

bye.

[Carmody]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)
This is correct. Some of you reading this may not have heard the dinner-table conversation (captured impromptu with a dictaphone I had in my pocket) between David Icke and Jordan Maxwell exchanging stories about reptilian encounters they had been told by others. This really needs to be heard.

http://projectavalon.net/David_Icke_...n_May_2010.mp3

I was also recently told (second hand) an account from a CIA agent who used to work directly in the White House with George Bush senior.

This man described how he had twice personally seen Bush Snr change into reptilian form, and that he needed human blood transfusions to keep his human form when on television. (When meeting him in person, this was not so necessary as there was a kind of mind control/hypnosis involved which convinced those meeting him that this was a human body.)

This sounds incredible, outlandish, and easily dismissed. But the agent in question was very freaked out and talked to my friend for many hours about this experience, and others.

My friend, in turn, had never heard of the whole reptilian issue... until later.

No proof: but more circumstantial evidence, that (God help us) just might be true.

And now folks, please read the direct DNA transference data now appearing on this website. (completely disconnected DNA taking on the energies and condition of adjacent DNA, no contact whatsoever.)

A study where a coherent laser light was shone through the egg of a frog onto the egg of a salamander and the salamander egg was born as the same genetically perfect frog that was of the first egg

Add in the idea of consensus reality, and how non-believers attending a 'test' of psychic ability can corrupt the test with the intrusion of their beliefs and desires (damaging the outcome),

Add in the understanding of Lamarckism, the idea that we carry the genetic imprint of our forefathers more directly (you will find information on this forum) than considered possible.

My bits about when in the 'clear state' becoming very sensitive to what I eat (and sensitives in general having this issue), and taking on those vibrations, and living a flash in my mind of the death of the given animal that I'm eating (I just had a strong episode of that the other day), see the monatomic silver thread started by me in the alternative health section, of what happened to me those few days back.

Why cannibals eat the flesh of others, to gain their energies and also their memories, and so on. (A recent article on a reformed cannibal warrior from Africa covers this to some degree),

Th Chinese beating dogs to death before they eat them in order to maximize the chemical transference of fear, so they are energized when they eat the flesh,

Thus the idea of how reptilians who are dimensionally only 'half here', need to consume the DNA of humans in order to maintain the physicality or vibration of our state and be perceived by us as being human. The line just above that, about the dogs in china. Tie it to the line below, this one you are reading....and if that does not make your blood run cold, I don't know what will.

If you add in the understanding that came out of a 'US Naval Academy Of research' (Yes, the united states NAVY) Study about the DNA being superconductive and hyper-dimensional --as in: out of time effects, and out of time and distance communications with one another....well..

Add in the point about superconductors being used in this world for the most sensitive measurements possible as they respond to the most sensitive signals,

Then the idea of alchemy (covered a bit my me on this site) being all about superdeformed atomic structures of the platinum metals group metals, superdeformed (superdeformed electron orbitals) so they span two dimensions and allow for dimensional transference and the human body actually being chock full of them (research the work of David Hudson and others), as they are the true engine of life, this backed up by research now appearing of many many deformed orbital states of H20 (water) alone. Gold atoms being used now in cancer research as it bonds to DNA..so...dang..perfectly.. which alchemists have known and utilized (on record) for at least 5000-6000 years.

Then the supporting works on this done by Joseph P. Farrell on the hyper-dimensional aspects of matter as pursued by the Nazi's in ww2, and how that was integrated into the US space program and black ops underground projects,

Regarding 'fooling the camera' and needing human blood transfusions for that.... but not when viewing in person, I can cover that on a personal level..in that I saw some chemtrail 'dumbbell' sprayers and I was taking photos of the chemtrails when I saw the sprayer. I snapped photos of the sprayer. The photo and the eyeball image DID NOT AGREE with one another. It is the psychic sensitives that are likely a main the target for culling (most to all of us have it to some degree), as they can 'see' through the illusion, to some degree... and have a chance of figuring this stuff out.

And much, MUCH more.....

I could go on in the world of facts and scientific studies almost forever, here. You can't view the bits of data in isolation, they need to be connected into a coherent 'meta study'.

Another point is that the compartmentalization of science was seemingly done to kill the idea of "meta-studies" (aka 'the Renaissance man') and keep people's minds tuned to tiny isolated grindstones. Even Einstein complained of this point. to keep overviews and connected data streams out of man's grasp, so no total pictures of what is really going on could emerge. News, nationalization, compartmentalization, politics, religion, finance systems ---all very very old techniques for controlling people. So old and core function.... that parents do it to their children every day.

If you look at all that, in the proper context....you start to see something taking shape. You see all the data required to make it exist, all the data that can make it all too possible and all too great a potential to be real. The believability factor jumps tremendously, frighteningly so, as all the data indicates that...it can actually exist.

Something that could be very, very, --- ugly.

If this does not convince one of the potential, recall I said: much much more data. This is the tip of the iceberg.

[majapahit]

Posted by Carmody (here)
.. direct DNA transference data now appearing on this website. (completely disconnected DNA taking on the energies and condition of adjacent DNA, no contact whatsoever.)

just heard an interview about this, great stuff

Something that could be very, very, --- ugly.

what we should tell mr. very, very ugly is this

eh, tss

in a calm & assertive manner
to set the boundaries of the pack
& to own the couch
(the dog whisperer), mt

[RUSirius]

It seems pretty obvious to me that they are trying to Debunk him, to illegitmize him. I'd say minimum 80% of what David Icke says is true, and that which is not true is probably pretty darn close to true but not right on. Definitely read his book, pretty mind blowing material that just fits in with everything most of us know.

[Hawkwind]

Well, the first thing that struck me about this video was that it is very, very well done, which makes me very, very suspicious as to its origin and veracity. This does not strike me as the work of a single individual, as it presents itself to be. That said, I still found it valuable food for thought.

I first ran across David Icke's work almost twelve years ago. At the time my impression was fairly similar to that depicted in this film, ie- that he was a shill actually working for the elites. Having followed his work since that time, however, it has become increasingly difficult to maintain that view. It is a common tactic of the elites to create and thereby control the opposition to their own programs. David has done so much to expose their goings on and has been so instrumental in bringing this information to the public, however, it's extremely difficult to see any possible benefit the elites might be deriving from this. As such, it has become equally difficult to believe that he is acting in accord with their plans.

As with everything in this area of investigation, deception is piled upon deception and the lie is different at every level. So, as always, it's wise to look at the evidence presented by both sides, do your own research and decide for yourself who and what to believe.

[Lord Sidious]

Posted by Transdimensional Bean Pod (here)
You could have PM'd me that.

I'm not interested in your opinion of how I 'sound'.

And the fact you care more about quote functions (how ever did we message boarders survive before the function!) than the point I was making, tells me all I need to know about you.

bye.

I find your response to be unworthy of the type of discussions on this board.
You pull me up on how I come across AFTER you post this.
Makes you sound double minded, not that you care how you sound, of course.

[Transdimensional Bean Pod]

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
I find your response to be unworthy of the type of discussions on this board.
You pull me up on how I come across AFTER you post this.
Makes you sound double minded, not that you care how you sound, of course.

Why are you injecting yourself into my dispute with another poster?

And who are you to judge what is 'worthy'?

Gimmie a break.

[Lord Sidious]

Posted by Transdimensional Bean Pod (here)
Why are you injecting yourself into my dispute with another poster?

And who are you to judge what is 'worthy'?

Gimmie a break.

Just putting my opinion up. Much like you have the same right to do.
I notice you can't take people criticising you or your opinion.
Why is that?

[Transdimensional Bean Pod]

Posted by Lord Sidious (here)
Just putting my opinion up. Much like you have the same right to do.
I notice you can't take people criticising you or your opinion.
Why is that?

Dude. A person who follows another poster around a forum to interject themselves into other disputes, is known as a troll. You aren't even engaging the topic - just opining on my 'worthiness'.

Why are you now trolling me and expecting a 'nice' response?

Troll here often?

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Icecold (here)
If this was your husband would you cover up his face while he was vomiting?

Barbara's covering of George's face is a strange gesture indeed. Nor can it be explained as the act of someone who is acting in irrational panic. Barbara seems quite aware of what she is doing. She is making sure that the room and cameras cannot see George's lower face.

Perhaps it was just an act of discretion, not wanting an image of George vomiting to go public. She would certainly be well aware how a single frame of camera video of such an incident can be quite harmful. So perhaps the gesture is not so strange, given Barbara's decades of experience beside a man in the public eye, and her usual "can do" level headed, cold hearted, spirit.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Transdimensional Bean Pod (here)
Why are you injecting yourself into my dispute with another poster?

And who are you to judge what is 'worthy'?

Gimmie a break.

[Mod Hat On]

Dear Friend, here are two quotes from your own fair hand:

Posted by Transdimensional Bean Pod (here)
I'm working hard to break my habit of being too mouthy too fast.

Posted by Transdimensional Bean Pod (here)
Maybe I just got tired of being a reactionary loudmouth somewhere along the way.

Keep on working on yourself. This is a good school. There are some smart people here (self included) who will not allow you to get away with things you could in earlier situations. This place is special - as you have observed.

All best wishes, Bill

[ThePythonicCow]

This cow is enjoying fantasies of Lord Sidious and Transdimensional Bean Pod taking their little discussion somewhere else.

P.S. -- Above written before I saw Bill's more helpful response. Nevermind.

[Transdimensional Bean Pod]

Bill-

Duly noted. I'm well aware of what I posted, and I've exercised considerable restraint. Thanks for throwing those in my face though. Extremely classy.

Don't worry. I'll unsubscribe myself. This place sickens me by now.

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Transdimensional Bean Pod (here)
Bill-

Duly noted. I'm well aware of what I posted, and I've exercised considerable restraint. Thanks for throwing those in my face though. Extremely classy.

Don't worry. I'll unsubscribe myself. This place sickens me by now.

Unsubscribed per your request.

[Lord Sidious]

Sorry if I have been a contributor in Bean Pod parting ways.
I didn't appreciate his narky posts at me and Orobo.
I try to remember that text doesn't display all the other things we can pick up on in a face to face and post in a way that what I say is understandable.
That isn't always possible and I realise the same for others.
But there is no mistake when it is blatant like I saw with Bead Pod.

[Celine]

This breaks my heart...so sad..

not what we stand for is it?

[Fred Steeves]

Posted by baggywrinkle (here)
I "met" George Herbert Walker Bush during his first unsuccessful bid for the presidency. It was in a fairly intimate lecture ampitheater (as in the movie paper chase) which had a capacity
of perhaps 75-125 people. Three rows back, front and center, about fifteen feet away at about his eye level where I could make direct eye contact with him. What I saw in those eyes
was ice cold. The impression I came away with at the time in spring of 1980 was of a snake looking at a sparrow. He is not a man I would ever bare my throat to.

That reminds me of Icke's observation of Jimmy Carter's eyes when he by "chance" was seated next to him at a River Dance show.


Cheers,
Fred s.