Active shooters in Las Vegas: 59 dead, 546 injured

[KiwiElf]

Posted by KiwiElf (here)
OK, let's take a look... Cropped, enlarged x3 & lightened (click on pic to enlarge)
- he might be wearing one of those mic/earpiece headsets (what appears to be his jawline...)?

Attachment 36245

[From Hervé: High rez picture Here (<---)]

Ahhh perfecto - thank you Hervé -always good to get hi res... and another perspective (... & I still can't see anything strange with the cop! - other than he must be darned uncomfortable!)

[Noelle]

Posted by Tintin Quarantino (here)
Oopsie daisy: looks like we have another Sandy Hook before the event article.

Search "WGOW stephen paddock" in Google and check the date.
Google never mis-date articles

Attachment 36244

Source is:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3CQCMZ43kLE

I believe it's fairly easy to modify article publication dates. Could it be a fabricated oops? Did the article's publisher intentionally change it to bait or to confuse those paying attention?

[KiwiElf]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by KiwiElf (here)
OK, let's take a look

Well, there are two things we could be looking at here. (At least! )



or

LOL America is Hollywood is America

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by KiwiElf (here)
LOL America is Hollywood is America

Yes.

My point (maybe not very well made!) is that this event just can't be seen in isolation. I'm 100.00% certain the shootings were real — but if one thinks about it for a moment, that actually doesn't matter. It's the intended effects on opinion and emotion that are the issue.

If there are more incidents like this over the next few weeks, then this is a real serious danger signal that may affect everyone in the US. (Not you and me, many thousands of miles away.) We know that Antifa radicals have warned of major events beginning 4 November. That's less than a month away now.

If they're serious, and if that all has covert Deep State backing, then there could be hell to come quite soon. Sounds scary, and hope I'm very wrong. But my attention is locked on this right now, and that for me is often a barometer of something to be taken seriously — whether planned events come to pass, or not.

Looking at individual, local photos and dissecting them microscopically is (I'd suggest, with genuine respect!) unproductive, diversionary wheel-spinning. These are specks of dust on the metaphorical screen, and may not even be anything significant or real. What about the plot of the movie?

The bigger picture may be so large that it's really hard to look at. It's far easier to focus on simple details that in the bigger picture mean very little — and maybe nothing at all.

[KiwiElf]

Yep - agreed. "They" are assessing the feedback to determine how effective it is & how to fine tune their next "incident"(s) = complete confusion & chaos

(Likewise I didn't make my point too clear with the "lookalike" scenario/video on the the previous page - you beat me to the gun before I could finish annotating it, but end result achieved )

[alexius]

Not sure if this has been posted. If not. Can someone help analyze this video. Looks like a person is crouching in, hits the flashlight and starts shooting straight into the crowd.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=hAULgl6Kja0

Maybe if someone can store it before it gets taken down from youtube. According to other sources the same video has been taken down multiple times. (not sure if it's only due to graphic images etc)

[KiwiElf]

Have downloaded it alexius - thank you! Time for a break & a Kit Kat - a new day is dawning

[Hervé]

I think "they" found out who actually did it, all by his lonesome self...

[KiwiElf]

LOL - you crack me up, Hervé! ... ahhhh isn't Photoshop wonderful!

[Omni]

Take a trip down the rabbit hole and read about the technologies they use to induce/persuade/coerce events like these: Total Individual Control Technology. The link is a very long list of bullet points and quotes taken from many aspects of my own work from the last couple years. I have paid a high price for this knowledge. This truth does not come without sacrifice...

Those who have obtained these technologies are the epitome of dirty and sick minded. I have zero doubt they are behind all manner of heinous events with these technologies worldwide. I have to look no further than my email inbox, twitter notifications, or skype for confirmation (beyond my own case).

[Cidersomerset]

The note on the table contained numbers....This may have
already posted....

Source: Las Vegas shooter's note contained calculations
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zF6IcKSSlfk
Published on 7 Oct 2017
A note in the hotel room of the Las Vegas shooter contained
calculations pertaining to the distance and trajectory from
his window to the festival crowd below, according to a law
enforcement source. CNN's Stephanie Elam reports.

====================================
====================================

More info revealed on Las Vegas shooter and his girlfriend

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BFBCGF-NnV4
Published on 8 Oct 2017
Will Carr reports on the latest known details.

====================================
====================================
Eric Shawn reports: Paddock, a blank slate?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O0CszcRM4hs
Published on 8 Oct 2017
'America's News HQ': Nevada Lt. Gov. Mark Hutchison
talks possible motivations of Las Vegas shooter.

===================================
===================================
Eric Shawn reports: The search for Steven Paddock's motive

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcj13YrOM1M
Published on 7 Oct 2017
(Ret) Lt. Randy Sutton of Las Vegas Police on the mass
murder's message.

==================================
==================================
Las Vegas massacre sparks gun control debate across
the country
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpGH9400zOA
Published on 7 Oct 2017
The ongoing gun control debate was reignited after Sunday's
deadly attack in Las Vegas. Robyn Thomas, the executive
director of the Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence, joins
CBSN with more on what states are doing in wake of
the massacre.

[Tintin]

Posted by LadyM (here)

Posted by Tintin Quarantino (here)
Oopsie daisy: looks like we have another Sandy Hook before the event article.

Search "WGOW stephen paddock" in Google and check the date.
Google never mis-date articles

Attachment 36244

Source is:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=3CQCMZ43kLE

I believe it's fairly easy to modify article publication dates. Could it be a fabricated oops? Did the article's publisher intentionally change it to bait or to confuse those paying attention?

I don't doubt that that is possible, but, the article appeared on WGOW, in fact twice, once on the AM and again on the FM pages on the same day, with the date 29 Sept. If you visit that site now the date viewable appears to have been modified to fit the official timeline. Personally think that this was a bloop as with Sandy Hook, and, back in 1963 with the LHO article appearing in a New Zealand paper, I believe, and I may not have remembered this exactly, at a time that was I think just before the assassination. The time differential may not have been factored in properly.

Who provided the story about Stephen Paddock to WGOW is as yet unknown. I am hitching my wagon to the likelihood that this was absolutely planned, as many of us suspect is seemingly abundantly clear now, and executed by another hand - the MO is just way too close to previous instances to be mere chance.

[Cidersomerset]

In this live chat The Las Vegas massacre James Fetzer is more clued up than he
was in the Rense interview in #286. Excellent overall summery of the political
situation from the Deep state, corporations and intel agencies and how this
Vegas shooting is another possible 'false flag' to continue their agenda...

The Las Vegas Massacre (Full Story)- Jim Fetzer, Dean Ryan and Marine John
Anderson Speaks out in this live chat....

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=OSvMkiPR4i8

Published on 6 Oct 2017
Professor James Fetzer Ph.D and Dean Ryan tell the full story of 'The Las Vegas
Massacre' from all different perspectives. Interview with Former Marine John

Anderson who was a on the ground witness to the massacre.

Quantum surveillance security roll out....


Jeff & Prof James Fetzer - Las Vegas…The Searing Truth CIA , Mossad and ISIS are
the same....False Flag Vegas Massacre
http://www.rense.com/Datapages/FFvegasmasscre.htm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wbUUphyZ_6s
Published on 6 Oct 2017
https://projectavalon.net/forum4/show...=1#post1184117

[KiwiElf]

Yes, you're quite correct Tintin - News of JFK's assassination/death appeared in NZ Newspapers before it had actually happened (if I recall, that fact is also mentioned in Oliver Stone's "JFK" movie)

[Satori]

Posted by alexius (here)
Not sure if this has been posted. If not. Can someone help analyze this video. Looks like a person is crouching in, hits the flashlight and starts shooting straight into the crowd.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=hAULgl6Kja0

Maybe if someone can store it before it gets taken down from youtube. According to other sources the same video has been taken down multiple times. (not sure if it's only due to graphic images etc)

I've seen this before and looked at it again 3 more times just now. I see nothing along the lines of what you are suggesting.

[alexius]

Posted by Satori (here)
I've seen this before and looked at it again 3 more times just now. I see nothing along the lines of what you are suggesting.

8 seconds in a person comes into frame from the lower left corner.

[Noelle]

Posted by Omnisense (here)
Take a trip down the rabbit hole and read about the technologies they use to induce/persuade/coerce events like these: Total Individual Control Technology. The link is a very long list of bullet points and quotes taken from many aspects of my own work from the last couple years. I have paid a high price for this knowledge. This truth does not come without sacrifice...

Those who have obtained these technologies are the epitome of dirty and sick minded. I have zero doubt they are behind all manner of heinous events with these technologies worldwide. I have to look no further than my email inbox, twitter notifications, or skype for confirmation (beyond my own case).

Do you think Paddock was manipulated by these technologies? Or was everyone involved in the event manipulated to play their parts? One more or: Was the entire event a virtual reality construct (created by AI or black project workers)? If I sound confused, it's because I am. There's so much that they can do with these technologies.

[Caliban]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by KiwiElf (here)
LOL America is Hollywood is America

Yes.

My point (maybe not very well made!) is that this event just can't be seen in isolation. I'm 100.00% certain the shootings were real — but if one thinks about it for a moment, that actually doesn't matter. It's the intended effects on opinion and emotion that are the issue.

If there are more incidents like this over the next few weeks, then this is a real serious danger signal that may affect everyone in the US. (Not you and me, many thousands of miles away.) We know that Antifa radicals have warned of major events beginning 4 November. That's less than a month away now.

If they're serious, and if that all has covert Deep State backing, then there could be hell to come quite soon. Sounds scary, and hope I'm very wrong. But my attention is locked on this right now, and that for me is often a barometer of something to be taken seriously — whether planned events come to pass, or not.

Looking at individual, local photos and dissecting them microscopically is (I'd suggest, with genuine respect!) unproductive, diversionary wheel-spinning. These are specks of dust on the metaphorical screen, and may not even be anything significant or real. What about the plot of the movie?

The bigger picture may be so large that it's really hard to look at. It's far easier to focus on simple details that in the bigger picture mean very little — and maybe nothing at all.

That's interesting Bill, in that just today you posted about 100 links to the very "simple details" that might mean "little... or nothing at all." But, okay.

However, I tend to agree, on the whole. Helene West said something on here a month or so ago that pretty much went ignored but hit me very hard. That while we go on and on speculating about this and many other similar topics... nothing changes. Things go on and seem to worsen.

You might say well, we're spreading the word, shedding light, etc. But we're really doing nothing. Or, nothing much. Or, we're doing just what THEY want us to be doing. Going round and round in endless speculation and theorizing.

Yes, we have brilliant people here, yes we have subtle analysis and yes we probably get close to the truth of things. But, one--most people "out there" don't care to hear about it, proved to me just tonight in a conversation. This is all too much for people with "busy lives" to handle, hear about, and possibly research. And two--what are we accomplishing? Is all this sharing of information, which is what we're doing--going to lead to any true changes in society? Or is this a "private" little club and we could just as well be playing five card stud?

[Satori]

Posted by alexius (here)

Posted by Satori (here)
I've seen this before and looked at it again 3 more times just now. I see nothing along the lines of what you are suggesting.

8 seconds in a person comes into frame from the lower left corner.

Thank you. I do see that. It appears that this person who crouched down then has flashes of light appear very near him and coinciding with the sound of what seems to be gunfire. Then, at about 19 seconds or so, a person appears right in front of the camera holding what seems to be a weapon. This person is in a tan shirt, with yellow stripes (like reflector material), and appears to be the same person who crouched down just before what seems like weapons fire started.

[Satori]

Posted by Satori (here)

Posted by alexius (here)

Posted by Satori (here)
I've seen this before and looked at it again 3 more times just now. I see nothing along the lines of what you are suggesting.

8 seconds in a person comes into frame from the lower left corner.

Thank you. I do see that. It appears that this person who crouched down then has flashes of light appear very near him and coinciding with the sound of what seems to be gunfire. Then, at about 19 seconds or so, a person appears right in front of the camera holding what seems to be a weapon. This person is in a tan shirt, with yellow stripes (like reflector material), and appears to be the same person who crouched down just before what seems like weapons fire started.

This person is a male and looks like he is in a law enforcement uniform. He's holding what appears to me to be a hand gun. It could be a small uzi-type automatic weapon. He looks guilty as hell of something.