The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis

[crosby]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by mountain_jim (here)

Posted by crosby (here)
The War Drummer:

The real reason why President Trump modified his statement about the Intelligence Community.

put Russia on the defensive and force Putin to provide evidence Trump is wrong.

I was a wee bit disappointed in the War Drummer's analysis on this one.

I'd have to imagine that it would take a lot more than that to put Putin on defensive.

I agree. I'm quite certain he isn't a man who scares easily.......perhaps it's another cue for another move to start moving forward.
warmest,
crosby

[Foxie Loxie]

Maybe this is just "hopium".....but I'm thinking Trump & Putin are together in the goal of taking down the Globalists! Hip! Hip! Hooray!

[KiwiElf]

A Week To Remember, Dark To Light - X22 Report Episode 1620b

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=_YLevMESN8A

X22Report
Published on Jul 21, 2018

Browder says the US cannot hand him over to Russia interrogators.

The Podesta brothers are receiving immunity for their testimony against Manafort.

Trump tweets interview with Clinton talking peace with Russia.

UK says they have a the person or person's who poisoned the Skripals, most likely this is propaganda.

Putin and Trump agree to referendums on Ukraine and Syria. Trump then shoots down the idea.

Behind the scenes the additional agreements are being made.

South Korea says North committed to De-nuclearization.

Syrian army now controls the southern part of Syria. Trump and Putin agree to work together in Syria.

Breaking down the week to remember and the dark to light symbolism.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Agenda Is Set, Next Phase The Central Bank - X22 Report Episode 1620a

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=5nWM7RmPniI

X22Report
Published on Jul 21, 2018

The Fed announced they are not considering digital currency, just like the Fed said back prior to the 2008 recession, they are not predicted or do not see a recession anytime soon.

The US debt is not being paid down, the payments are going to the interest and soon the tax receipts will not be enough to cover the interest.

Trump takes the next step, calls out the Fed and drops the first set of bread crumbs to create the narrative on why the economy crashed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check Out The X22 Report Spotlight YouTube Channel – https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1rn...

Join the X22 Report On Steemit: https://steemit.com/@x22report

Get economic collapse news throughout the day visit http://x22report.com
Report date: 07.21.2018

All source links to the report can be found on the x22report.com site.[COLOR="red"]

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by Foxie Loxie (here)
Maybe this is just "hopium".....but I'm thinking Trump & Putin are together in the goal of taking down the Globalists! Hip! Hip! Hooray!

Not hopium,.. they are!

[Satori]

For what it's worth:

My posts on this thread show that I am skeptical, if not cynical, regarding "Q." Even more so since the public emergence of "R." Now there is an "R" who may be JFK Jr. Really? All of this is rather QR.

We're being let around by the nose. Beta test. Whether by white hats, black hats or gray hats. Watch the circa 1975 movie Parallax View. We're Warren Beatty.

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Satori (here)
For what it's worth:

My posts on this thread show that I am skeptical, if not cynical, regarding "Q." Even more so since the public emergence of "R." Now there is an "R" who may be JFK Jr. Really? All of this is rather QR.

We're being let around by the nose. Beta test. Whether by white hats, black hats or gray hats. Watch the circa 1975 movie Parallax View. We're Warren Beatty.

The Parallax View - Trailer - (2:46 minutes)

The Parallax View, a superb drama about one man's paranoia that turns out to be total, incredible fact, ranks amount the best political thrillers. Warren Beatty is a news reporter who, along with seven others, witnesses the assassination of a political candidate. When the other seven die in "accidents," the newsman begins to doubt the official position: that a lone madman was responsible for the crime. He imagines a sophisticated network of highly trained murderers. But his nightmares pale against the bizarre truth he uncovers.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=KSMfrfpj9FQ

The Parallax View: The Brainwashing Scene (1974) - (5:51 minutes)

The greatest conspiracy thriller ever made, Pakula's masterpiece is a stark and cinematic piece of paranoia combining Cold War hysteria with Manchurian Candidate-style machinations. The underrated Warren Beatty sleuths his way through an increasingly tense series of set pieces as the invisible forces of the Parallax Corporation draw ever closer. This 'brainwashing' scene is the movie at its most subversive - how they mine such dread and emotion out of only a handful of clips and some cynically-produced music is staggering. Whether it really does turn Beatty's character into a card-carrying killer, or just a pawn in a high stakes game played out by a hidden layer of unaccountable conspirators, is up to you.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=vhztDt7-QT8

[Bill Ryan]

Posted by Satori (here)
For what it's worth:

My posts on this thread show that I am skeptical, if not cynical, regarding "Q." Even more so since the public emergence of "R." Now there is an "R" who may be JFK Jr. Really? All of this is rather QR.

We're being let around by the nose. Beta test. Whether by white hats, black hats or gray hats. Watch the circa 1975 movie Parallax View. We're Warren Beatty.

Yep......!

[crosby]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Satori (here)
For what it's worth:

My posts on this thread show that I am skeptical, if not cynical, regarding "Q." Even more so since the public emergence of "R." Now there is an "R" who may be JFK Jr. Really? All of this is rather QR.

We're being let around by the nose. Beta test. Whether by white hats, black hats or gray hats. Watch the circa 1975 movie Parallax View. We're Warren Beatty.

Yep......!

Perhaps..... But you have to admit, the 'what if' factor is quite compelling!

warmest,
crosby

[A Voice from the Mountains]

Posted by Satori (here)
My posts on this thread show that I am skeptical, if not cynical, regarding "Q." Even more so since the public emergence of "R." Now there is an "R" who may be JFK Jr. Really? All of this is rather QR.

I don't know anything about "R" but what finally convinced me that there was something legitimate to the Q posts is when I saw that some early Q posts were using self-verification methods like using unusual words and a number, which represented the number of minutes after the Q post that Trump then tweeted the same key words in a tweet. After seeing a few examples of this kind of "handshake" between the Q drops and Trump's tweets, as well as some pictures from Asia that Q dropped before the White House released them through Twitter, and just various things like that, it's too coincidental.

[crosby]

Posted by A Voice from the Mountains (here)

Posted by Satori (here)
My posts on this thread show that I am skeptical, if not cynical, regarding "Q." Even more so since the public emergence of "R." Now there is an "R" who may be JFK Jr. Really? All of this is rather QR.

I don't know anything about "R" but what finally convinced me that there was something legitimate to the Q posts is when I saw that some early Q posts were using self-verification methods like using unusual words and a number, which represented the number of minutes after the Q post that Trump then tweeted the same key words in a tweet. After seeing a few examples of this kind of "handshake" between the Q drops and Trump's tweets, as well as some pictures from Asia that Q dropped before the White House released them through Twitter, and just various things like that, it's too coincidental.

I have seen a lot of very interesting and compelling videos regarding 'Q' and 'R' anon...... I actually just watched the video below and I find it really intriguing.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bWzPH0T3nZg

crosby

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Bill Ryan (here)

Posted by Satori (here)
For what it's worth:

My posts on this thread show that I am skeptical, if not cynical, regarding "Q." Even more so since the public emergence of "R." Now there is an "R" who may be JFK Jr. Really? All of this is rather QR.

We're being let around by the nose. Beta test. Whether by white hats, black hats or gray hats. Watch the circa 1975 movie Parallax View. We're Warren Beatty.

Yep......!

Most any widely considered "affair" has elements of psyops, public relations, propaganda, emotional hooks, ... in it.

Thus are key means by which ideas are rapidly or widely advanced in the some portion of the general populace.

Truth and lies, good and evil, can be advanced by such means.

That such means are used tells us little as to the nature of the concoction being served to us.

I for one, apparently not the only one, take some amusement in the particular manner, the various puzzles and games, by which this Q phenomenon has been played, and I imagine that I am seeing some useful and helpful insights into the dark side of the Imperial American Empire and its apparent decline.

Even so, even as I take some delight in promises of the imminent decline and fall of the Bush-Clinton-Obama crime syndicate, I realize that after the old boss is gone, it may be time to "meet the new boss, same as the old boss."

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by A Voice from the Mountains (here)
After seeing a few examples of this kind of "handshake" between the Q drops and Trump's tweets, as well as some pictures from Asia that Q dropped before the White House released them through Twitter, and just various things like that, it's too coincidental.

Yes - I am quite confident by this point that Trump knows who is Q, and supports Q's work.

[Noelle]

Posted by crosby (here)

Posted by A Voice from the Mountains (here)

Posted by Satori (here)
My posts on this thread show that I am skeptical, if not cynical, regarding "Q." Even more so since the public emergence of "R." Now there is an "R" who may be JFK Jr. Really? All of this is rather QR.

I don't know anything about "R" but what finally convinced me that there was something legitimate to the Q posts is when I saw that some early Q posts were using self-verification methods like using unusual words and a number, which represented the number of minutes after the Q post that Trump then tweeted the same key words in a tweet. After seeing a few examples of this kind of "handshake" between the Q drops and Trump's tweets, as well as some pictures from Asia that Q dropped before the White House released them through Twitter, and just various things like that, it's too coincidental.

I have seen a lot of very interesting and compelling videos regarding 'Q' and 'R' anon...... I actually just watched the video below and I find it really intriguing.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=bWzPH0T3nZg

crosby

That's pretty mind-blowing. The only explanation that comes to mind is a sophisticated AI, and Q has stated that AI is part of the team.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Noelle (here)
That's pretty mind-blowing. The only explanation that comes to mind is a sophisticated AI, and Q has stated that AI is part of the team.

What would interest me more (though I cannot imagine is possible to get) would be Google search results for Q's trip codes, if the search was done a year ago, prior to Q posting.

In other words, we may be seeing a feedback loop here: the topics and books of interest to Q researchers might end up being associated with Q trip codes in Google's database.

In which case, other than as a routine validation that Google's search algorithms are working as intended, this might mean little.

[ThePythonicCow]

Here are the six trip codes that appear to have been used by Q, as taken from the web page https://qanon.pub/ by myself just now:

2jsTvXXmXs
4pRcUA0lBE
CbboFOtcZs
ITPb.qbhqo
UW.yye1fxo
xowAT4Z3VQ

When I search for any one of these trip codes in Google Books, I get lists that are, while not identical, seem to have a fair bit of overlap, from what I can tell, just glancing at the first page of these six searches.

I'd guess that these books reflect the interests of Q researchers, and so end up associated with Q's trip codes in Google's search engine, which is all about connecting dots of closely associated web activity, searches, and/or website links.

[Noelle]

Posted by Paul (here)
Here are the six trip codes that appear to have been used by Q, as taken from the web page https://qanon.pub/ by myself just now:

2jsTvXXmXs
4pRcUA0lBE
CbboFOtcZs
ITPb.qbhqo
UW.yye1fxo
xowAT4Z3VQ

When I search for any one of these trip codes in Google Books, I get lists that are, while not identical, seem to have a fair bit of overlap, from what I can tell, just glancing at the first page of these six searches.

I'd guess that these books reflect the interests of Q researchers, and so end up associated with Q's trip codes in Google's search engine, which is all about connecting dots of closely associated web activity, searches, and/or website links.

I tested a few on my own. One book that keeps showing up is The Spinning Magnet: The Electromagnetic Force That Created the Modern World--and Could Destroy It.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Noelle (here)
I tested a few on my own. One book that keeps showing up is The Spinning Magnet: The Electromagnetic Force That Created the Modern World--and Could Destroy It.

I see the same book.

My guess is that if this search had been done a year ago, before Q, then Q's trip codes would have resulted in a brief error screen saying "Your search - 4pRcUA0lxx - did not match any documents. ", as happens for me now, when I search on some altered mutation of a Q trip code.

My further guess is that these trip codes are essentially showing us what books are unusually popular with Q researchers.

<yawn> .

[RunningDeer]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by Noelle (here)
I tested a few on my own. One book that keeps showing up is The Spinning Magnet: The Electromagnetic Force That Created the Modern World--and Could Destroy It.

I see the same book.

My guess is that if this search had been done a year ago, before Q, then Q's trip codes would have resulted in a brief error screen saying "Your search - 4pRcUA0lxx - did not match any documents. ", as happens for me now, when I search on some altered mutation of a Q trip code.

My further guess is that these trip codes are essentially showing us what books are unusually popular with Q researchers.

<yawn> .

Maybe not worth a mention... in this case the copyright is 2018.

[Foxie Loxie]

I still say the Q phenomenon has been most useful in waking up some of the sleeping public....that in itself is worth something!!

Sorry some of you more highly intelligent people find it a bore! What are we supposed to do; just keep sleepwalking, allowing the Elite Bastards to continue trampling all over us?! So many brave persons have come out with their stories, even killed for telling their stories....to do nothing would be to ignore all they have sacrificed.

Personally, I could care less Who or What "Q" is, or if it is a psyop....the point is, more people are becoming aware of how we have been manipulated & controlled for eons. For that reason, I would say "Q" has been a Good Thing.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by RunningDeer (here)
Maybe not worth a mention... in this case the copyright is 2018.

So ... if that book would have shown up in Google book searches a year ago ... we'd have another rabbit hole to chase down ... something to do with timelines .

Posted by Foxie Loxie (here)
Sorry some of you more highly intelligent people find it a bore!

... Q is no bore here ... but seaching Q trip codes on Google Books was less fruitful in my view, than it was in the view of the Youtuber Cordicon that crosby and Noelle linked to, above.

Posted by Foxie Loxie (here)
Personally, I could care less Who or What "Q" is, or if it is a psyop....the point is, more people are becoming aware of how we have been manipulated & controlled for eons. For that reason, I would say "Q" has been a Good Thing.

Yes - "Q" is a good thing, not a bad thing

[Satori]

Posted by Foxie Loxie (here)
I still say the Q phenomenon has been most useful in waking up some of the sleeping public....that in itself is worth something!!

Sorry some of you more highly intelligent people find it a bore! What are we supposed to do; just keep sleepwalking, allowing the Elite Bastards to continue trampling all over us?! So many brave persons have come out with their stories, even killed for telling their stories....to do nothing would be to ignore all they have sacrificed.

Personally, I could care less Who or What "Q" is, or if it is a psyop....the point is, more people are becoming aware of how we have been manipulated & controlled for eons. For that reason, I would say "Q" has been a Good Thing.

But that's starting to hit on my point. Is Q/R a good thing? I assume Q and R are real, because if nothing else they have occupied the minds and energies of many people for quite some time, and clearly someone(s) and something(s) are behind Q/R. That alone makes them real in some sense.

But, the question I raise is not whether they are real, but whether they are what they seem to be...? What is the agenda? Is it what they say and would have us believe or is it something else? What is the color of their hat?

I'm asking, not saying--because I do not know.

I want to believe. But there needs to be a bit of Dana Scully in all of us, along with Fox Mulder. And we must always remember, they are characters in a TV show and movies, created by others. I submit that we are not unlike that too. What takes place on the silver screen and, to quote David Icke, "the hypnotist in the corner" is not limited to the big screen or the TV (or other electronic devices). Not anymore. The script and the set has moved from where it was, to where it is now--playing out in real life where we are all supporting actors in some way. (This is due in part to those other electronic devices.)

What was once a fairly clear line between TV and the big screen (and other electronic devises) on the one hand and our reality "out there" in the "real world", on the other hand, has been blurred to the point where it can be very difficult on occasion to tell the difference between the two. Cui bono?

I wonder. If Q is legitimate, why is an R required? I have more questions than answers. But there's something gnawing on me about Q that sets off my alarms. Now there are those who throw R into the mix and we are being asked by them to believe that R is JFK, Jr. That's a very big pill for me to swallow. Things are moving on that score from the strange to the bizarre.

Forgive me if I come cross as preachy or something. I do not mean to be. I'm just trying to make sense of what is so often apparent madness.

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Satori (here)
But, the question I raise is not whether they are real, but whether they are what they seem to be...? What is the agenda? Is it what they say and would have us believe or is it something else? What is the color of their hat?

There is certainly (well, certain to me at least) that Q, and if worthy of the same stage, R, are incomplete, partially fictionalized and fantasized characters, just as, perhaps, Jonathan Swift's Gulliver, or Lewis Carroll's Alice, or various characters of Tolstoi, Dickens or Shakespeare were, in their times.

Whether told as scientific fact, legal stari decisis, or the fiction of plays, novels, cinema, or 8chan ... there is ever and always the risk (the near certainty, in my jaundiced view) that some of what is told is quite wrong, and some is quite evil.

No, Mr. McLuhan, the medium is not entirely the message .