Posted by Paul
(here)
Posted by mountain_jim
(here)
I don't usually understand a lot of the Q material, the details and research at the Neon link were helpful today.
https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/07/2...reatawakening/
So it appears from the Avenatti tweet that Q referenced this weekend from a few days before the missile firing at AF1 that Avenatti had advance knowledge? (later - no his tweet was after)
I noted in
Post #5890 above that I thought that Neon Revolt got the address (450, should have been 500) wrong of a picture of a man walking on the street, in front of Avenatti's office.
I think that Neon Revolt got this one wrong too, a bit more significantly wrong.
...
However, timezones also matter. Brennan might have been first, if his tweet time of 4:47 AM was east coast US time, which would have been only 1:47 AM west coast US time, two hours before the missile image, or Brennan might have tweeted almost an hour after the missile launch, if that tweet of his was observed using west coast US time.
The missile image at 3:56 AM is surely west coast US time, and Avenatti's tweet at 8:00 PM is likely west coast time as well, since Avenatti's tweet is in Newport, California.
Furthermore, to refine
and perhaps alter what I just wrote above, I presume that those tweet timestamps are in the timezone of the observer, who recorded that tweet image, which is not necessarily the timezone of the one writing the tweet. (
I wish those recording tweet images would note their timezone right on their saved images.)
So I cannot tell, with the evidence I see before me, whether Brennan tweeted before or after the missile image, but unless the Avenatti tweet image was recorded in some east Asia (Oriental or Aussie) timezone, Avenatti tweeted long after the failure of the missile would have been evident to all watching (if by no means more than the absence of some headline news event.)
===
Thus I come to the conclusions that Avenatti tweeted almost certainly after the missile failure would have been obvious to him, and that we cannot tell, from the available evidence, whether Brennan tweeted before or after the missile failure would have been evident to him.
My conclusions are thus quite different from Neon Revolt's conclusions, which are that both of these tweets were before the missile failure.
I don't trust Neon Revolt with numbers ... but I still read him for interesting ideas and Q coverage.
Re: The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis
Reply With Quote
Re: The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis
Bookmarks