The Qanon posts, and associated US political analysis

[Helene West]

Thanks for the drops, Paul.

Say a little prayer, visualization, or whatever is your choice - for protection of the Pres. at las vegas rally tonite. wee nervous after the last rally with those weirdos sitting behind him

[Ba-ba-Ra]

This from the Health Ranger:

Bombshell: Kavanaugh accuser works for abortion pill Big Pharma corporation.

The female accuser who claims - without any evidence - that U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh groped her in high school turns out to be closely tied to an abortion pill Big Pharma company that stands to lose revenues if abortion rights are curtailed.

Now the full details behind the false accusations are coming out. It's yet another organized smear to push Big Pharma agendas.

See the full, shocking story here.
https://www.naturalnews.com/2018-09-...ill-maker.html

[Noelle]

We have a tweet from Q tonight on Valiant Thor.

I am Valiant.
I am here.
Like the son of "Odin".
The fall of the cabal.
90-784-98UPZ67
Are you scared yet?
6:58 PM - 20 Sep 2018
https://twitter.com/mG7VJxZNCI/statu...11011982852096

The attached image was tweeted separately. https://twitter.com/mG7VJxZNCI/statu...11011982852096

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by Noelle (here)
We have a tweet from Q tonight on Valiant Thor.

I am Valiant.
...

I've not been following that "REDACTED" twitter account that is apparently thought to be or claiming to Q's.

How reliable is the identification of that twitter account with Q? Is someone (Valiant himself ?!?) pulling our chain ?

Currently, I only trust 8 chan as a source of Q's comms.

[crosby]

Posted by mgray (here)
It appears yours truly may have gotten a nod from Q?

Right on mgray. As 'Q' would say, "The more you know"......... Thanks so much for bringing so much to this thread!
warmest,
crosby

[Noelle]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by Noelle (here)
We have a tweet from Q tonight on Valiant Thor.

I am Valiant.
...

I've not been following that "REDACTED" twitter account that is apparently thought to be or claiming to Q's.

How reliable is the identification of that twitter account with Q? Is someone (Valiant himself ?!?) pulling our chain ?

Currently, I only trust 8 chan as a source of Q's comms.

MGray had asked about that too on Sept. 13. I addressed it as best as I could here.

[crosby]

Here's an excellent SGTreport video posted on the 20th. This video is an interview with author Donald Jeffries. Their discussion hits on the fact that as time goes by, people may change within the government but the agencies do not change and organized corruption continues to grow and expand. They also discuss how badly the population is brainwashed as to how they will accept the evils of the corrupt such as Hillary over Trump because they have been so brainwashed to believe that POTUS is the bad guy. It's very interesting. They also talk about 'we don't speak his name'......

And for the record, I do not believe Kasich misspoke when he stated " 'no name' was put to death"........

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=eX6WHASNZN4

Enjoy!!!!!!
crosby

[crosby]

Posted by Noelle (here)

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by Noelle (here)
We have a tweet from Q tonight on Valiant Thor.

I am Valiant.
...

I've not been following that "REDACTED" twitter account that is apparently thought to be or claiming to Q's.

How reliable is the identification of that twitter account with Q? Is someone (Valiant himself ?!?) pulling our chain ?

Currently, I only trust 8 chan as a source of Q's comms.

MGray had asked about that too on Sept. 13. I addressed it as best as I could here.

I see some similarities but also some differences in elocution, and I'm glad that you are posting these here. It's offering us a little more depth - - I'm totally on board with the fact that 'Q' is more than one person...big Q little q - if you will..... one may only post on 8chan but....... there may be another who is offering a little more on twitter. Thank you for bringing these to us.
warmest,
crosby

[ThePythonicCow]

.

Five more Q drops for Sept 20, 2018

From https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#273

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 09/20/18 (Thu) 21:12:37 No.273

https://twitter.com/michaelbeatty3/s...59024235266048
Good catch, Patriot.
Q

From https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#274

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 09/20/18 (Thu) 21:28:12 No.274>>275

https://twitter.com/ColinSkow/status...53008017956864
POTUS provided you w/ a VERY special greeting.
Did you catch it?
Q

From https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#275

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 09/20/18 (Thu) 21:42:12 No.275

>>274
https://twitter.com/306Deplorables/s...65260544733186
Q

From https://8ch.net/patriotsfight/res/62.html#276

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 09/20/18 (Thu) 23:06:09 No.276

File (hide): 5b5f0405c70ebd2⋯.png (499.76 KB, 295x640, 59:128, 2165.png) (h) (u)

From https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/3115181.html#3115380

Q !!mG7VJxZNCI 09/20/18 (Thu) 21:36:51 7de555 (1) No.3115380

>>3115286 .. [[ Link to Youtube video of Trump's MAGA rally in Las Vegas. - Paul. ]]
[-10:34]
VIP Patriot
Front Row.
Q

[ThePythonicCow]

One of my favorites, Dave Janda, interviewed by a stalwart journalist Greg Hunter, about the topics we're discussing here, such as which high level officials from the Obama administration have flipped and are telling Horowitz and Huber the truth about the corruption, the efforts to steal the 2016 US Presidential election, and the efforts to frame and take down Trump, after he won anyway.

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=NNm17FUY7Qk

Greg, as usual, interrupts a little more often than I'd like, but he's a bull dog, and Janda seems to have some well connected sources.

Janda figures that Trump is setting up to take down much of this corruption, high up the power structure.

Janda figures that Trump will then become more transparent about the difficult financial situation the US is in, and do as good a job as can be done to manage the US through what is essentially a bankruptcy, as the US Dollar collapses, losing at least its role as the world's reserve currency.

[ThePythonicCow]

Here's another one of Praying Medic's regular Q analyses:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=U5Vdb76eq8k

===

P.S. -- No, Praying Medic ... at 5:34 you say that DDOS is "disseminated denial of service". DDOS is distributed denial of service. Finally, I found a tiny detail about which I know more than Praying Medic <grin>.

[crosby]

Posted by Paul (here)
Here's another one of Praying Medic's regular Q analyses:

Source: https://youtube.com/watch?v=U5Vdb76eq8k

===

P.S. -- No, Praying Medic ... at 5:34 you say that DDOS is "disseminated denial of service". DDOS is distributed denial of service. Finally, I found a tiny detail about which I know more than Praying Medic <grin>.

I am just not a fan of Prayingmedic. There are too many issues within his posts that do not ring true or are actually not true.
cros.
+++++++++++++
To relate to a previous Paul post: ' Lisa Page is the equivalent of deep throat to the current administrative debacle.' BWAHAHAHHHAHAHAH.

This response is not from the Prayingmedic video....... it is from the Greg Hunter video..... my bad. So Sorry!



When does a bird sing???? Apparently when they want to save their own ass.....

[crosby]

Thank you so much for fixing my last post. Apparently, my mind and fingers are working on different levels.
warmest,
crosby

[ThePythonicCow]

Posted by crosby (here)
I am just not a fan of Prayingmedic. There are too many issues within his posts that do not ring true or are actually not true.

Yes - each of us will have our own preferences in which sources, commentators, etc we trust or prefer listening to.

That's as it should be.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by crosby (here)
Thank you so much for fixing my last post. Apparently, my mind and fingers are working on different levels.
warmest,
crosby

I fixed nothing ... your fingers have more power than you realize .

[crosby]

Posted by Paul (here)

Posted by crosby (here)
I am just not a fan of Prayingmedic. There are too many issues within his posts that do not ring true or are actually not true.

Yes - each of us will have our own preferences in which sources, commentators, etc we trust or prefer listening to.

That's as it should be.

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Posted by crosby (here)
Thank you so much for fixing my last post. Apparently, my mind and fingers are working on different levels.
warmest,
crosby

I fixed nothing ... your fingers have more power than you realize .

You are the best!!!!! Thank you so very much.
warmest,
crosby

[ThePythonicCow]

I'm responding on this "pro-Q" thread to this post made by Daozen on the primary "anti-Q" thread, so as to not over stay my welcome over there.

Posted by Daozen (here)
We're now in the downswing phase. Obvious cracks appearing. Watching hardcore followers jump through mental hoops trying to defend their loosh investment is like watching a cartoon baddie falling down a well, clawing at the sides as he falls to his inevitable demise.

I've learned a lot this last year, thanks to the drops of Q and the work of many of us figuring them out.

Q could turn out tomorrow to be the bastard child of Putin, operating out of his mother's basement, just having some fun, and I'd still be grateful (as well as totally amazed.)

Unlike the other "heros" that you refer to, the real value of Q has not been what he told us, but what many of us learned, shared, and figured out while working together trying to make sense of it all, including in many cases independently researching and verifying the incomplete, ambiguous but tantalizing clues dropped by Q.

Some of us will recall that Robert David Steele has been advocating "Open Source Intelligence." Well, to some considerable extent, that's what Q is helping to make happen.

Also, given the dominance of the main stream and major alt-media news media, most of which are to some extent controlled outlets, either of the "main stream story" or of some limited hangout or controlled opposition, Trump needed something like Q. Steele has repeatedly recommended that Trump have his own news channel; to some extent (not that Steele says such) Q is that channel.

... as for the "downswing" phase ... from what I can tell, Q's reach is still growing quickly. There have been doubters and people who just made the perfectly reasonable choice that Q is not their cup of tea, all along.

[mgray]

Perhaps I can help PrayingMedic (my mistake I meant NeonRevolt) with his organizational chart malaise here. NSA IG Storch is big news.

[crosby]

Posted by Paul (here)
I'm responding on this "pro-Q" thread to this post made by Daozen on the primary "anti-Q" thread, so as to not over stay my welcome over there.

Posted by Daozen (here)
We're now in the downswing phase. Obvious cracks appearing. Watching hardcore followers jump through mental hoops trying to defend their loosh investment is like watching a cartoon baddie falling down a well, clawing at the sides as he falls to his inevitable demise.

I've learned a lot this last year, thanks to the drops of Q and the work of many of us figuring them out.

Q could turn out tomorrow to be the bastard child of Putin, operating out of his mother's basement, just having some fun, and I'd still be grateful (as well as totally amazed.)

Unlike the other "heros" that you refer to, the real value of Q has not been what he told us, but what many of us learned, shared, and figured out while working together trying to make sense of it all, including in many cases independently researching and verifying the incomplete, ambiguous but tantalizing clues dropped by Q.

Some of us will recall that Robert David Steele has been advocating "Open Source Intelligence." Well, to some considerable extent, that's what Q is helping to make happen.

Also, given the dominance of the main stream and major alt-media news media, most of which are to some extent controlled outlets, either of the "main stream story" or of some limited hangout or controlled opposition, Trump needed something like Q. Steele has repeatedly recommended that Trump have his own news channel; to some extent (not that Steele says such) Q is that channel.

... as for the "downswing" phase ... from what I can tell, Q's reach is still growing quickly. There have been doubters and people who just made the perfectly reasonable choice that Q is not their cup of tea, all along.

You bet your ass it's growing. Just look at the volume of the 'Q' channels on the you . tube that are taking off and growing like mad. that in itself is a quick reference to what is happening. Look at the volume on 8 chan and twitter..I don't even know about the underground channels that may actually be divulging more.... even the anti/Q crap is growing. That alone says it all. Stop, stop, stop, for just a minute, and think that something good might actually be happening here, please......... this is divisiveness at it's finest hour. Do not let it continue.
crosby

copied and pasted to anti Q thread

[crosby]

Posted by Paul (here)
I'm responding on this "pro-Q" thread to this post made by Daozen on the primary "anti-Q" thread, so as to not over stay my welcome over there.

Posted by Daozen (here)
We're now in the downswing phase. Obvious cracks appearing. Watching hardcore followers jump through mental hoops trying to defend their loosh investment is like watching a cartoon baddie falling down a well, clawing at the sides as he falls to his inevitable demise.

I've learned a lot this last year, thanks to the drops of Q and the work of many of us figuring them out.

Q could turn out tomorrow to be the bastard child of Putin, operating out of his mother's basement, just having some fun, and I'd still be grateful (as well as totally amazed.)

Unlike the other "heros" that you refer to, the real value of Q has not been what he told us, but what many of us learned, shared, and figured out while working together trying to make sense of it all, including in many cases independently researching and verifying the incomplete, ambiguous but tantalizing clues dropped by Q.

Some of us will recall that Robert David Steele has been advocating "Open Source Intelligence." Well, to some considerable extent, that's what Q is helping to make happen.

Also, given the dominance of the main stream and major alt-media news media, most of which are to some extent controlled outlets, either of the "main stream story" or of some limited hangout or controlled opposition, Trump needed something like Q. Steele has repeatedly recommended that Trump have his own news channel; to some extent (not that Steele says such) Q is that channel.

... as for the "downswing" phase ... from what I can tell, Q's reach is still growing quickly. There have been doubters and people who just made the perfectly reasonable choice that Q is not their cup of tea, all along.

You said it nicer than I did, so sorry....... it is so easy to get defensive and want something to be true. Just like wanting to love the bastard child. It's all there. We all know it. We all want to accept a fate better than a painful suffering death. That is what humanity is facing.
crosby

[mountain_jim]

Posted both threads..

Well even NeonRevolt, whose detailed coverage of Q posts I have often linked to, is not giving Q much support today.

A critical thinker, not a follower, he appears to me.

https://www.neonrevolt.com/2018/09/2...edition-qanon/

That said, I’m… really disappointed with this next batch of drops. Possibly the most disappointed I’ve ever been. I’m just not seeing anything tremendous in these, and I’ve never said this in an article before, but I wouldn’t mind if you just skipped this article. (I know! I know!) I express my frustration at more than one turn, and it’s not pretty.

Some people don’t like that. They think I’m getting pissy, and complain that it’s not my job and Q knows better, and yadda yadda yadda, cue the boring, trite, dead-horse boomer-logic.

Too bad. It’s my site; I do what I want. I say what I want, And I’m not a sheep.

I’m also not some QAnon cheerleader, endlessly trying to think up new cheer patterns in preparation for the “big game.” Frankly, I think these drops suck, and they really don’t say much at all. In fact, for the first time, they give me MORE reason to doubt Q, after last night.

So, literally for no other reason than completeness, here’s the most underwhelming #NewQ post I’ve ever written:

...
I’m up to my ears in [0] deltas, guys. I never found them particularly convincing anyway – and I don’t think normies are really gonna care, either.

We just went another week kicking the DECLAS can down the road. Kavanaugh still isn’t confirmed. FEMA can’t even send out a simple text.

I know it’s all gonna happen at some point, but when you combine it with posts of such a boring and relatively-useless caliber, well… you shouldn’t be surprised I don’t have anything positive to say.

If you’re angry that I’m reacting this way to the drops, you shouldn’t be.

Frankly, you should be asking the same questions I’m asking, and voicing your own concerns.

Anything less isn’t thinking critically.

It’s just being a different kind of sheep.

..

Sorry guys. That’s just where I’m at with these posts. I know you want the in-depth digs. I know you want the serious analysis. There was just… nothing, literally nothing here that I could work with tonight. I kept holding off on the article, hoping Q would post something substantial, but no, it was not to be.

No ad today. I’m too disappointed in the drops, not just from this day, but from the past few days.